<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Torbe Network - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_56025</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=56025</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-20-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:38pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 74&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;235&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-About 800 videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can download most videos in 4 format which include Quicktime, ipod/psp, wmv and mpg4.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can use a download manager.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can download some of the picture sets as a complte file.&lt;br /&gt;
-The videos are all dated.&lt;br /&gt;
-There is an option to search using the models name.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Large part of the content appears to be leased and the quality is from good to poor.&lt;br /&gt;
-The camera work in many of the videos is not very good and the cameraman tends to zoom on the penetration for too long.&lt;br /&gt;
-Certain scenes have only video and no pic sets while others have only pics and no video.&lt;br /&gt;
-The language used in many of the videos is not English.&lt;br /&gt;
-Many of the videos have a strong amateurish feel to them.&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of the leased content little to no model info.&lt;br /&gt;
-Synopsis of the action in the videos is often incorrect.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I haven't been lucky with my memberhsip of late beause this is another network that has really disapointed me.  I thought that I could find some goo videos but out of about 800 or so videos. I have downloaded about 12 and all will be deleted from my computer.  There are still quite a few videos that llok good but they don't appeal to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This network might appeal more to someone who's just starting to surf for porn and likes the amateur/newbie style of porn.  I'd avise most older porn surfer to avoid because of the leased content.  You don't want to join this site only to find out you have many of the videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=56025&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=56025&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Dec 2010 19:38:23 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_54395</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54395</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-01-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:40pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;dracken&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7834&quot;&gt;213&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A fairly large network which offers 34 sites (although several only have around 20-40 videos). Overall you should get 800 scenes, most of them available in various formats (including a PSP and Ipod format which I took full advantage off)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Most scenes are decent quality (as usual older ones are lower quality and as you get newer stuff it goes up to around 1280x720) &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Some sites have zipped photos, some don't. The ones that did have images were decent quality at 1200x 800.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- The big draw of the site are the amateur models which are mostly Spanish. A lot of them are very cute and they seem to really have fun. Almost all the network has a light-hearted feel and the girls giggle and seem relaxed. Also there is very little of the classic porn modeling where the girl looks turned-on but everyone can tell she's not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloads worked flawlessly and streaming was perfect. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- I had no trouble signing up or canceling, despite what everyone else on here mentioned.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- More scenes would have been nice, especially in the bukkake site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Several sites in the network are dedicated to only one model, which is fine as long as you like that model. It can be a hit or miss.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Sometimes you get too much of the male models, their interaction with the girls is funny, but when the guys wear masks or make funny faces...it can get distracting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Some download managers have problems with this site( I recommend the firefox download them all extension. It has yet to fail me)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Overall this network was a pleasant surprise, but I am very interested in teen and amateur porn. As such I tend to easily forgive a site is they make silly mistakes or if the male models are too in your face, hell I'll even accept a somewhat funky guy introducing almost all videos as long as I get a feeling of &quot;this is unscripted, real sex with girls that are having fun.&quot; Which is what this site is all about. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like I said you have very little of that glamour, airbrushed, playboy feel to the models, they don't open their mouths slightly, looking &quot;sexy.&quot; they laugh and gag on too much semen and run to the bathroom and genuinely look cute and nervous. This feel made the site unique for me, now many people will find this boring or annoying and you have to be sure you like the models before joining. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another point you should be aware off is that there are only a few anal scenes and overall the girls are treated very politely, there is no abuse or humiliation even in a mild form. Of course this is a double edged sword and as a person who liked a little rough sex I was a bit disappointed...but you can't always have your cake and eat it too.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For me the highlights of the network were &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbecouples/&quot;&gt;TORBE COUPLES&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/freakbukkake/&quot;&gt;Freak Bukkake&lt;/a&gt; site as well as the dream teens. In all three the focus really seems to be on the girls and there are a ton of cute models who do hardcore (again, so anal or deep-throating, but we do get oral and regular sex in various positions)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The conclusion? I personally will keep an eye on this network and I hope they will continue uploading (they now have a nifty preview section so you know what's coming), but I am also a person that enjoyed Pierre Woodman tremendously and one of my top sites is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nubiles/&quot;&gt;Nubiles&lt;/a&gt;.com, because of the interview videos they have with the girls. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Either way, you should check out their tour page, because I find it's very descriptive of what you get inside (even if the view more buttons for each site doesn't work, at least you'll get a feel for the network)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54395&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=54395&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 19:40:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_47504</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47504</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-07-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:43am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4711&quot;&gt;bacardiancoke&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4711&quot;&gt;22&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Good selection of models&lt;br /&gt;
- Good amateur content&lt;br /&gt;
- Good download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Odd navigation&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates are bitty&lt;br /&gt;
- Some sites haven't seen updates in a long time
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The Torbe Network is a collection of sites that range from solo models to bukkake and the old chestnut &quot;meet a chick on a street, offer her cash and take her back to your place to fuck&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not hugely different to other network sites, Torbe has its strengths and its weaknesses.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Going for it is some originality in some of its content mixed with a great ability to get real, amateur, attractive models. Well done there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Downloading content is easy enough and fairly quick. Pic sets come in .zip form. Various vid types (wmv, mp4, mpg and mov available.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the downside, pic sets are few and far between and vidcaps and only available on some sets which is a pity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The only thing that lets it down for me is the male models. I am of the opinion that the male models (unless in a specific storyline) ought to be like spooks - unobtrusive, invisible etc. Unfortunately this isn't really the case in many of the vids here which is a great shame considering they are otherwise almost all great examples of how amateur content can look.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bottom line? If you like your european (and some argentinan) amateur models in different situations then this is certainly for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and keep a watch out for cross sales (which are an opt in though.) Though by now you should all be watching out when you sign up for sites anyway!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=47504&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=47504&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:43:26 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_46798</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=46798</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-20-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;TheSquirrel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5603&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Girls seem to be mostly genuine amateurs. &lt;br /&gt;
Girls are naturally pretty, shapely and with a refreshing lack of tattoos and fake breasts.&lt;br /&gt;
No regional price discrimination.&lt;br /&gt;
Good download facilites. No DRM or download&lt;br /&gt;
restrictions and downloads are quick.&lt;br /&gt;
Good quality on the latest videos of 1280x720&lt;br /&gt;
Genuine unusual niche network. A bit different to&lt;br /&gt;
the usual cookie cutter sites. &lt;br /&gt;
No irritating cameraman or obnoxious male who gets&lt;br /&gt;
in the way and is disrespectful to the girls. The&lt;br /&gt;
girls are the main focus.&lt;br /&gt;
Streaming is available and there is a choice of part or full downloads.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very poor for photo fans. &lt;br /&gt;
Vid caps are not downloadable. There are some photo files that are faulty and will not download. For hardcore photo fans most of the sites only have softcore photos. There are only a few hardcore photos on the entire network.&lt;br /&gt;
Camerawork and lighting is poor in places. &lt;br /&gt;
There is too much POV for my taste. In amateur videos if you like to watch the look on the model's face as she has sex on camera for the first or one of the first tines you will be disappointed when all you see is a close up of the two groins, badly lit and out of focus. This is a shame because one moment you get to see the whole girl having sex and the next you get a dark, blurred POV of two groins.&lt;br /&gt;
Quite a few of the sites are small and/or dead.&lt;br /&gt;
Not many updates even on the more recent sites.&lt;br /&gt;
Some material poor quality, especially older stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
Minor niggles are the ads at the bottom of the page in the members area, and also the layout, navigation, and model search aren't that brilliant.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is an unusual site for those who say they are jaded about porn, and is something a bit different. The sites either feature Torbe like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbeinrussia/&quot;&gt;Torbe In Russia&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbecz/&quot;&gt;Torbe Cz&lt;/a&gt;, or for instance &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jositoswill/&quot;&gt;Josito's Will&lt;/a&gt;, where a guy in a wheelchair has sex with beautiful girls. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbecouples/&quot;&gt;Torbe Couples&lt;/a&gt; features amateur couples having sex. Some sites are a bonus but the emphasis is on genuine amateur girls, and niche sites.&lt;br /&gt;
Videos come in Quick Time, Ipod, MPEG, and the top rate is WMV at 1280x270.&lt;br /&gt;
When my membership ended a couple of weeks ago they advertised 620 total scenes, 250 models, 15,000 minutes, and 900,000 mb.&lt;br /&gt;
The sites featuring Torbe have their own idiosyncracies. There is usually a short interview involving Torbe talking to the model. With &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/priestdamian/&quot;&gt;Priest Damian&lt;/a&gt; this is simply changed to an acting bit where Torbe as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/priestdamian/&quot;&gt;Priest Damian&lt;/a&gt; talks to the girl. After a few minute there is the strip followed by a few minutes of oral then down to sex about 7 to 15 minutes in. The clips are generally about 20-30 minutes. The camera work is unusual. Sometimes it is stationary at the back of the room and you get to see the whole model having sex from almost a voyeur's point of view. I like that. There are not too many quick movements or flashy camerawork. What I hate are the POV sequences. It is the POV close ups where the picture is quite often dark, blurred, out of focus, or jumping around without any purpose. That is annoying. With amateur girls it is often good to look at the whole girl and the look on their faces when they first start to have sex on camera for the first, or one of the first times.&lt;br /&gt;
With the poor POV camera view you just see two groins coming together. Not erotic. The lighting is sometimes a problem in the whole of some of the videos too. &lt;br /&gt;
Maybe surprisingly Torbe doesn't get in the way too much or become irritating. Yes he sometimes dresses up with silly false teeth and tries to look as ugly as possible, but he doesn't seem the &lt;br /&gt;
slightest bit threatening. He comes across more like Benny Hill than Max Hardcore Once the short introduction is over, and the action starts the&lt;br /&gt;
main focus is on the girls rather than Torbe.&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the sites are dead or have very few updates and are quite small. Here are some examples of the sites.&lt;br /&gt;
Doctor Schmutz 26 episodes between 5th sept 2008 to 12 december 2008.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/streetbribes/&quot;&gt;Street Bribes&lt;/a&gt; 37 episodes between 23 March 2009 to present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbecz/&quot;&gt;Torbe Cz&lt;/a&gt; 21 episodes between 15 january 2009 to present.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jositoswill/&quot;&gt;Josito's Will&lt;/a&gt; 10 episodes between 12 December 2008 to 14 May 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbeinargentina/&quot;&gt;Torbe In Argentina&lt;/a&gt; 19 episodes between 19 December 2008 to 20 July 2009.&lt;br /&gt;
Possibly the biggest disappointment for me was the lack of picture facilities. Quite a few of the zips did not download properly or not at all. The vidcaps are just one screen of many stills taken from the video but cannot be downloaded. There are very few hardcore pictures. &lt;br /&gt;
It's a real curate's egg of a site, but certainly worth checking out, because it is very rare to see so many amateurs with an amateur look having sex.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=46798&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=46798&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:22:31 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2789</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2789</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-06-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 67&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;227&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The preview of these sites looks pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
Some rare stuff with a few good looking models and this strange looking dude.&lt;br /&gt;
There is a couple or more of really sexy videos with latinas.&lt;br /&gt;
More bonus sites with solo-girls or individuals hardcore.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Most of the softcore stuff is ripped off somewhere else.&lt;br /&gt;
And one of the better looking sites with czech girls did'nt work at all - still does not, and I am about to end my term.&lt;br /&gt;
And I'm not comming back.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The positive is a very few good looking videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But after all: most of the content is either strange or boring.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Do not waste your money
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2789&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2789&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:04:45 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1548</guid>
		<title>Torbe Network Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1548</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/torbenetwork.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Torbe Network&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/torbenetwork/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:15pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=95&quot;&gt;DpornGuy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=95&quot;&gt;36&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Original content&lt;br /&gt;
-Fresh faced amateurs mostly&lt;br /&gt;
-Variety of models and site styles&lt;br /&gt;
-Fairly unique in style and concept
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Sex isn't always that great&lt;br /&gt;
-most of the sites don't have much content&lt;br /&gt;
-Last updates have all been DVD non-exclusive scenes&lt;br /&gt;
-Site has not added the new sites as promised
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I don't know what happened here. This network of sites looked like it was going to compete fairly well with the other networks and somewhere along the lines... it just hasn't happened...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site itself seems to be either having problems or soon to close down. i tried to log in today and got a 404 not found!!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Torbe hasn't added any new or exclusive content in months, just scenes from DVDs which you can pretty much find in many sites...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The torbecash webmaster program site hasn't been updated in months, so i'm guessin either the site will close down soon, or will just keep adding non exclusive content and never add the newer sites and content....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Might want to wait awhile and see what the webmasters/admin do before joining this one.. especially since there's no login page!!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12980&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Torbe Network&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1548&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1548&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 15:15:24 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
