<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Retro Porn Archive - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/retropornarchive/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2906</guid>
		<title>Retro Porn Archive Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2906</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/retropornarchive/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/retropornarchive.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Retro Porn Archive&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/retropornarchive/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Retro Porn Archive&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:47pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1047&quot;&gt;Kittygirl&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1047&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Lots of streaming video clips&lt;br /&gt;
* Lots of black &amp;amp; white hardcore photos&lt;br /&gt;
* GENUINE vintage material&lt;br /&gt;
* Simple, good-humored site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Material is disorganized - almost impossible to determine a video's content before starting to stream it&lt;br /&gt;
* cannot download videos without a program such as Quicktime Pro&lt;br /&gt;
* Comparatively high cost of membership, given the nature of the material&lt;br /&gt;
* No trial offers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I LOOOOVE vintage.  REAL, old-time pre-1970 vintage porn that is, not just modern models play-acting in their grandma's huge underwear.&lt;br /&gt;
Unfortunately this site is a bit hit-and-miss, as although there is a reasonable archive of vids and photos, it's really disorganized and just lumped into one great big hodge-podge of hardcore and non-hardcore... That's it.  As for determining the genre of the video you are about to view, well, the site member just has to start streaming and hope for the best!&lt;br /&gt;
All in all, given that retro is a very small niche market we sort of have to take what we can get, but there are certainly better vintage sites around.  ...and I intend to review all of them until I find one that really does it for me, so stay tuned!&lt;br /&gt;
No, I wouldn't really recommend membership to this site, in fact I have already canceled mine.    As I said, there are better sites around, so have a look at this by all means, but I wouldn't waste my money on a membership if I were you...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12892&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Retro Porn Archive&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2906&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2906&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 19:47:57 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
