<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Amour Angels - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_50482</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50482</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-09-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:35pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=13074&quot;&gt;SteveO&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=13074&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- The models are amazing&lt;br /&gt;
- Site layout is ok&lt;br /&gt;
- Pretty good variety of shot layouts and pics&lt;br /&gt;
- High quality pics and videos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Download is SLOW&lt;br /&gt;
- I wish there were more videos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The models on this site are amazing and I have not seen any of the content on other sites. I only wish it didn't take so long to download the videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=50482&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=50482&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:35:11 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_39058</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39058</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-28-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:51am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 97&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4810&quot;&gt;Fingers&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4810&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Exclusive high-quality content.&lt;br /&gt;
Great quantity of photos (460 sets) and videos (131 sets).&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of amazing teen models (~300) and some of them I never saw at other websites, just at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;AmourAngels&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
Each model has only 2-3 sets (just some of top-models have more photos and videos), so base of models are very varied.&lt;br /&gt;
Resolution of photos is 3000-5000 pxl, most of videos have HD-quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Three formats of photos (low, medium, original) and 2 formats of videos (wmv, avi) are available.&lt;br /&gt;
Pretty nice new interface and user-friendly navigation after redesign.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Some photos have wrong, insufficient focus, but quantity of them isn't valuable.&lt;br /&gt;
Besides that there are some videos (from old shooting), where camera shakes and jumps, but usually models are so cool, that you don't pay attention to this defect.&lt;br /&gt;
Or it's features of new photographers.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					As for me, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;AmourAngels&lt;/a&gt; really teen models are collected. Yeah, at other websites there are a lot of beautiful models, but they are rather babes, not teens. And here, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;AmourAngels&lt;/a&gt;, exactly teen, innocent, shy models with natural beauty. There is no unnecessary make-up and other stuff. I think,&lt;br /&gt;
that it is main advantage of this website. Besides that some cool features were added after redesign. I mean slide-show, adding to favorites, Amour GFs&lt;br /&gt;
(I hope, owners will develop it in future) etc.&lt;br /&gt;
I am downloading from Europe and have no problems.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=39058&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=39058&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 03:51:46 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_30962</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30962</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-07-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:39pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2881&quot;&gt;rayone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2881&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
Gorgeous-looking models&lt;br /&gt;
Large amount of content (304 models, some with 2-3 image sets with amount 60-80 images/set)&lt;br /&gt;
Excellent image quality in the highest resolution (2000x3000 or 2600x3900 for newst sets)&lt;br /&gt;
About 108 videos in DivX and WMV format.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Images display in 3 sizes 400x600, 700x1024 and highest resolution. The lower resolutions are useless. It should be better for the members if they offered their images in 700x1024 (small), 1600x2400 (medium) and orig resolution. &lt;br /&gt;
Download speeds are very slow (&amp;lt; 100kB/s) both in east and west coast of the US. This would explain why they offer such a small size images.&lt;br /&gt;
It can take over 30-45 minutes to download one set. Downloading videos can take so long that  most of the video content of this site is practically non-viewable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The site offers a large amount of content of very good quality (image sets and videos). The navigation needs to be improved along with their download speeds in order to make this site worth the price of admission. Given that many of their photographers also have their work shown in better sites such as  met-art, metmodels, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt;, this site really has a way to go before being able to offer the same type of navigation/download experience as those sites.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=30962&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=30962&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 16:39:07 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13985</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13985</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:47am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 76&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some very pretty models...&lt;br /&gt;
- Video resolution is very solid 740 on high end...&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures are hi-res and downloadable in zips and look very nice...&lt;br /&gt;
- The site makes many incredible promises...&lt;br /&gt;
- Very artsy site if that is your thing...&lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds are at least above average...&lt;br /&gt;
- Site has a little wow factor when you first join with the big pictures, the top tier models...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Some very bad looking models&lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality is nice, but the videos are few and far between (more exp in BL)&lt;br /&gt;
- While the pictures res, beautiful models and quality is high, the poses, the &amp;quot;look at me, I'm a statue&amp;quot; crap is annoying. &lt;br /&gt;
- It doesn't keep any of its promises at all&lt;br /&gt;
- The level of artsy makes me think more of painting a picture than having sex&lt;br /&gt;
- DL speeds are likely high because there really isn't much to download&lt;br /&gt;
- Site becomes very boring within a week
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This was a on the spot rushed decision to join. My wife loves this art crap posing as porn. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Let me start by saying there are plenty of really beautiful models on here. I really liked Danya, Katya, Lisa and Vikroria is a stunner. The rest that I took time to look at were of no interest to me. Several of these women have much smaller boobs than I have.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don't get me wrong, most have very pretty faces, but a big amount do not have bodies that make most men think, I would love to see her naked, instead, maybe you should just stand there and smile. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I feel bad about saying those things, but there comes a point that someone has to slow this whole art-porn movement down. Many women in porn look hotter dressed than these women look nude. The site makes the promises that others on here have noted. More videos, but there was a total of 3 uploaded to the site while I was a member. The videos are art. Girls spinning around in circles, dancing slowly and gracefully. Then, they did the perfect set, a woman in a beret. How Art is that? The picture quality is great, some up to 4,400 on the high end, but damn the poses! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You've seen the poses, I'm a statue and so sad. It is like they hired mimes to be models. The picture quality is the only positive. The few really gorgeous models are worth looking into. The videos, there are 33, and I kept zero. Total disappointment on those. Only if you like the models, is this worth joining, even then, I can't recommend it for the price!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13985&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13985&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2007 10:47:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12781</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12781</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-26-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:32am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;227&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Photo-section is the best for this site&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of exclusive easteuropean teens and a lot known easteuropean teen in exclusive photo-sets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some fine videos in fine quality, some in average/poor qiality&lt;br /&gt;
Zip for photos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Way too few videos.&lt;br /&gt;
The site has promissed more videos and updates for archives videos, but that has not been fullfilled in my period of membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site was one I had some expectations for. Since the webmaster stated to both jd1961 and myself in a mail, that the amount of videos would increase.&lt;br /&gt;
But that has not happened.&lt;br /&gt;
In almost a month three, maybe four new videos has appeared - that's a laugh.&lt;br /&gt;
Look at the price - almost the same as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/1byday/&quot;&gt;1ByDay&lt;/a&gt; - which has 2 dayly videos in very high quality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But ok, for old timers like me on the porn-hunt &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/1byday/&quot;&gt;1ByDay&lt;/a&gt; and alike might get a little boring in the long run. So the alternative COULD be a site like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
But, folks at PU - AA is not an alternative. The pickin&amp;acute;is much too slim. For a video-freak you do not want to restrict yourself with three or maybe four new videos in a month for $29.95.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The best thing about this site is the amount of exclusive photos - and thats what earns the score. But I no longer care much about photo-sets, so for other video-entusiast at PU: I cannot recommend this site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12781&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12781&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:32:35 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12567</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12567</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-21-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:58am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;ace of aces&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;179&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ 230 pic sets &lt;br /&gt;
+ pic resolution 680*1024 looks nice&lt;br /&gt;
+ high video quality (dvd)&lt;br /&gt;
+ download in one part&lt;br /&gt;
+ download up to 19 different parts&lt;br /&gt;
+ wmv and avi video format&lt;br /&gt;
+ updated regular &lt;br /&gt;
+ videos updated every 8 days&lt;br /&gt;
+ exclusive content &lt;br /&gt;
+ no drm&lt;br /&gt;
+ no dl limit
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- the dl files in one has no specific name &lt;br /&gt;
- dl manager disabled &lt;br /&gt;
- music in the videos &lt;br /&gt;
- only 21 video files &lt;br /&gt;
- to soft rather not even mastrubation&lt;br /&gt;
- no extras&lt;br /&gt;
- regular price is to high
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					i joined this site in hope of getting a high quality packed up with videos amateur site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
what i get was high video quality and new amateuers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but i mass videos, now way. ok the site is new and updated every 8 days (start with 05.12.2006 up to 14.11.2007) but there are only 21 videos an that site. therfore i disagree with the information from silver (35 videos). and one more thing, my downloadmanager wasn`t quite usefull when the diles have all the same names. this is a non support of dl managers in my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
at second there is to often music in the videos. that is awfull. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the content is much to soft. there is no dildo play an rather no mastrubation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the price is for that less videos much to high.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
alltogether it`s a site which looks good with even good looking (not sound :) ) videos. but for that much money and that less videos it`s only an average site.&lt;br /&gt;
change the price under 15$ rise the quantity of videos and stop the music ^^ then they will get a 85+ until then only high average 79 points.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12567&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12567&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:58:10 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9977</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9977</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:40am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2870&quot;&gt;silver&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2870&quot;&gt;41&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ More than 35 high quality videos &lt;br /&gt;
+ More than 5400 hi-res (up to 4400 pixels) pics&lt;br /&gt;
+ More than 100 hot young and pretty girls&lt;br /&gt;
+ Content is updated weekly &lt;br /&gt;
+ Fresh faces&lt;br /&gt;
+ Chicks look natural&lt;br /&gt;
+ Real girl-next-door models&lt;br /&gt;
+ No DRM protection&lt;br /&gt;
+ Download managers are supported&lt;br /&gt;
+ AVI and WMV video formats
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A little bit pricey (29.99 for a month)&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore&lt;br /&gt;
- Poor navigation&lt;br /&gt;
- Hard to find other cons
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; is by way of being near perfect. This website gives you access to more than 35 high quality videos and 5400 hi-res pics. The site is pretty hard to classify (solo girls, lesbians or something like that). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; don't offer any indecent or explicit content. You won't see any hardcore or even softcore porn here. The site offers only the nudity pics and videos that are admitted to be real full scale art. Each photo set contains from 50 to 140 high-quality pics. I've chose between low-res, medium-res and original-res quality. The videos are downloadable in two formats: AVI and WMV. You could also download each video by parts. I've took a rest of all those hardcore videos. And my wife likes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; even better than I do. I know we'll come back to this one.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9977&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9977&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:40:07 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_8978</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8978</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:47am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;95&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Hi-Res Photos&lt;br /&gt;
-Hi-Res Videos&lt;br /&gt;
-Zip Files In 3 Sizes&lt;br /&gt;
-Very Attractive Models                             -A Lot Of Photo Sets
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Some Of The Photography Is Erotically Bland&lt;br /&gt;
-Not A Hint Of Hardcore&lt;br /&gt;
-Video Updates Infrequent
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A true Hi-Res site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; features very pretty Russian models in softcore settings. Technically, the photos are outstanding, and are available as zip files in 3 sizes: 4000px (!), 1024px, and 800px. They are crisp and crystal clear. The Hi-Res zip files are enormous,sometimes up to 300MB for a single photo set. Fortunately, the download speed there is good now, when I was a member last year, it was quite slow. But I have had no problem downloading this visit. The models are for the most part very pretty and of the &amp;quot;nymph&amp;quot; variety. Many are well known using (or given) different names, such as MPL's spectacular Anya, known here as Irina and Ira. Confusing, but they have a nice model index to find the girls. I won't call the photography totally non-erotic, but it does lean in that direction. The photos look great though. The videos are also hi-res, @ 720x480. Not nearly as plentiful as the photosets,and only updated every 10 days, these are the usual softcore fare. Girl takes clothes off, girl frolics doing girl things, plus a few pseudo lesbian scenes. If you like this sort of &amp;quot;action&amp;quot;, you will be pleased with the full screen high resolution. You will not see anything resembling hardcore. I like this site because the photos are so collectible, with magazine cover included.***UPDATE*** I've never downloaded a whole site before, but the photo material here is so good, I finally did with a lot of patience. So I upgraded the score for quality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=8978&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=8978&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 02:47:33 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4087</guid>
		<title>Amour Angels Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4087</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/amourangels.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Amour Angels&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-25-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;IcemanTC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very nice and pretty girls!&lt;br /&gt;
- Good picture quality
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Login doesn't work pretty often!!!&lt;br /&gt;
- Silly &amp;quot;retype access code&amp;quot;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The main problem is the Login: It often doesn't work AT ALL. Except this, the girls are really HOT! Nice and fresh! As the content isn't that big, get in, download the things you like and get out...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12862&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Amour Angels&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4087&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4087&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 04:04:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
