Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/bumsinaction/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_15756 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15756 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/bumsinaction/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/bumsinaction.jpg" alt="Enter Bums In Action" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/bumsinaction/"><b>Bums In Action</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 02-02-08&nbsp;&nbsp;07:01am</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 50</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=300">Jay G</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=300">63</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> 1. Could be an interesting site for those tired of looking at &quot;pretty people&quot; fuck. People in these videos are definitely not &quot;pretty.&quot; <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> 1. Poor quality video.<br /> <br /> 2. Part of a network that failed me after 2 days. Bought a 30 day membership. The log-in page wouldn't accept my typing, so I wasted lots of time trying to get in in various ways before giving up &amp; cancelling my membership. This is the first time in scores of memberships that I've found such technical difficulties on a site. <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> 1. Poor quality old and mediocre content on this and many of the other network sites.<br /> <br /> 2. Log-in problems totally spoiled my experience. No replies to my e-mails so far from the address given. I've spent far more time trying to log-in than actually viewing porn. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12696"><b>Visit Bums In Action</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15756">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15756">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:01:45 PST