<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Chick Pass - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_46352</guid>
		<title>Chick Pass Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=46352</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chickpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chick Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-07-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4711&quot;&gt;bacardiancoke&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4711&quot;&gt;22&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Huge Collection of material&lt;br /&gt;
- Proper amateur work, very natural with no visible known porn stars&lt;br /&gt;
- good download speeds
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very poor navigation&lt;br /&gt;
- Search facility is more basic than a Jungle toilet&lt;br /&gt;
- inconsistent material&lt;br /&gt;
- Can't decide if the site is value for money or not&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates are nothing to write home about&lt;br /&gt;
- X Sales. Sign of a con artist, not a good way of building my trust!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you are looking for amateur (sometimes user submitted porn) then this is certainly a place to entertain for one subscription period. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is generally passable and for those who like their amateurs then it will keep you entertained for a while.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I won't go into individual &quot;stars&quot; due to the way that the portal is structured and will instead take an overall view of presentation and content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Presentation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I grow tired of portals and sites that are stuck firmly in their &quot;pre-2005&quot; type design and layout. It is lazy and insulting to those of us who pay good money to use your sites. PLEASE will you start modernising!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Design - poor and confusing. They appear to have tried to make it simple and have instead left it with a bizarre structure that is confusing, even to someone who's seen hundreds of porn sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation - a hatefully basic search facility where you can click on &quot;tags&quot; but cannot exclude and results are limited when committing to a genreal search. Please sort it out, a tag cloud and improved search function isn't that difficult to magic up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Content - inconsistent and varied. Of course you would expect that with an amateur site, but some are directed by a fairly professional team yet are still inconsistent. How does that work? If the webmasters offered hints and tips to the models then submitted content would very much improve to those who aren't sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Value for money - this I'm really struggling with. They say you get what you pay for in content, but I'm a little pissed off that the design and navigation qualities of the site make me NOT want to look in the first place. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Conclusion&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Chick Pass is in bed with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/tacamateurs/&quot;&gt;TAC Amateurs&lt;/a&gt; and is very much the poor relation. This is intended in reference to the state of the site not the content. If I'd known that a site would put me off visiting it then I wouldn't have visited in the first place.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Models of Chick Pass, make your voices heard. This is your revenue that the bone idle webmasters are costing - the portal needs investment and modernising, badly!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Webmasters of Chick Pass. Please stop insulting those who invest in your business and crack on with the much needed work. If your portal was easier on the eye and to navigate then your result would have been closer to the one that TheBestPorn offered (which I bitterly disagree with at present).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12677&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=46352&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=46352&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:53:09 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_19773</guid>
		<title>Chick Pass Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19773</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chickpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chick Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-02-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:24pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3493&quot;&gt;aesop7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3493&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-If you like a geeky guy with a wife-next-store type, you might dig this.&lt;br /&gt;
-Amateur without being so poorly filmed as to be unwatchable.&lt;br /&gt;
-Quite a lot of content.&lt;br /&gt;
-They say exclusive, and all of it was new to me.&lt;br /&gt;
-Lots of sex-party content&lt;br /&gt;
-I joined on the trial and was able to access everything. Probably worth it for the trial price.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Um... if you like, ... you know ... ATTRACTIVE women, you might want to look elsewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
-The geeky guy who's in many if not most of these vids seems about as into it as the registration renewal guy at the DMV. On a Friday afternoon. In May.&lt;br /&gt;
-Confusing to get around.&lt;br /&gt;
-After checking out about 50 of the vids I downloaded while a member, I've trashed all but 2. A record-low percentage of keepers.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is among the 2 or 3 worst sites I've joined. I expected lots of good exclusive amateur vids. There's lots, but they're Weak. Some of the peripheral material is way better than the &amp;quot;main course&amp;quot; stuff: Amazing Sluts of Montreal has a couple of good scenes. But AmazingSluts of Brazil and Asia are aweful. The sex party stuff seems lifeless. I don't think there's a female on this whole site who I'd want to see again. There are just Way better amateur sites out there. I cannot recommend a month here. Take the trial if it's your bag... and if you find any gems, post a comment so I don't have to keep sorting through all the bad ones!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12677&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19773&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=19773&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:24:51 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3443</guid>
		<title>Chick Pass Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3443</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chickpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chick Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:44pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=789&quot;&gt;turismo&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=789&quot;&gt;55&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
Great trial price with full access&lt;br /&gt;
Superb download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
Massive amount of content to browse&lt;br /&gt;
Includes movies, pictures, webcams and stories&lt;br /&gt;
Models of every age, shape and size - something for everyone
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&amp;quot;No frills&amp;quot; design of the site&lt;br /&gt;
Confusing navigation - I know I have missed stuff because I took a wrong link here or there&lt;br /&gt;
Movies are zipped which can be time consuming&lt;br /&gt;
Different quality of movies and pictures&lt;br /&gt;
Some sites haven't updated for a while&lt;br /&gt;
Some sites very small
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you are looking for a well organised site with top quality pics and movies then this site wouldn't be for you, but if you are looking for amateurs and have the time to trawl through the navigation then this is a worthwhile purchase.  Although the movies are zipped which means you have to spend time extracting them, the download speed is superb.  Having to input your user details multiple times can be a pain, but as you choose your own username/password isn't particularly annoying.  There are hundreds of movies and thousand of pictures to enjoy, and although a lot of the models I wouldn't describe as hot, the variety means everyone can find someone they like.  Every fetish is in here somewhere if you look hard enough, and its a bit like finding a geniune antique in a junk store, well worth the effort.&lt;br /&gt;
There is certainly enough to keep you entertained for 30 days (or 5 if you took the trial option) but only if you have to patience to try to navigate the site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12677&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3443&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3443&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 18:44:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1838</guid>
		<title>Chick Pass Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1838</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chickpass.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chick Pass&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chickpass/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:27pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 74&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=787&quot;&gt;Blue Thunder&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=787&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					lot of pictures of amuture women&lt;br /&gt;
lot of video's of amuture women&lt;br /&gt;
Price is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
Original content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Could use a better search engine in the site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The trial period seems to get you full access to the site, so thats a plus. Also they have pictures and videos that are not seen at every other site. Overall I would give it two dicks up (LMAO). I would say this site is worth a visit.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12677&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chick Pass&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1838&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1838&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 22:27:29 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
