Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicnudesluts/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_41734 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41734 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicnudesluts/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicnudesluts.jpg" alt="Enter Public Nude Sluts" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicnudesluts/"><b>Public Nude Sluts</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 11-02-09&nbsp;&nbsp;08:54am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2306">jbgild</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2306">2</a>)<br> <br> <b>Daily DL limit of 1 GB isn't a con?</b><br> <br> Maggie claims that:<br /> "On Public Nude Sluts there are "No rules and no limits."<br /> Well as stated in the site facts there's a daily dl limit of 1 GB. I am puzzled as to why this isn't considered being a con and not even mentioned in the review?<br /> A site that is MUCH better than Public Nude Sluts is <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nipactivity/">Nip-activity</a>, which received a lower score than this site, even if there's NO dl limit on <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/nipactivity/">Nip-activity</a>, and it has lots of longer running HD videos!<br /> Why, if I may ask?<br /> <br /> And one thing more:<br /> The site facts states that use of downloadmanagers aren't allowed, yet Maggie says they should work...?<br /> Why would you want to use a dl manager when all you can dl is 1 GB a day? <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12636"><b>Visit Public Nude Sluts</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=41734">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=41734">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Mon, 02 Nov 2009 08:54:20 PST