PU - Errotica Archives - New Reviews

Errotica Archives Review

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:02:00 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

06-24-11 11:02am

REVIEW = 93 by The Collector (7)

Pros:
- All of the content is all-exclusive
- A user friendly layout and model index
- Search function available
- Low, Med, and HI photo galleries
- Zip files for all picture galleries
- Most models are an ELITE level of beauty
- Photo galleries have a high avarage photo count
- Large model selection
- No download limit and they are download manager friendly
- Steady stream of updates
- There are model bios however, (see cons)

Cons:
(To have a fair review there must be a few cons but all are rather minor)
- Most videos are of just the photo shoots
- They do not offer video streaming
- Videos come in a zip file, ugh!
- No discount available, (see bottom line)
- Model bios are very basic, if they could start getting interviews or something a bit more personal it would really help their cause.

Bottom Line:
Bottom line

This site is an amazing for those who love glamour, if you are into more hardcore sites then I would advise you to move on. That being said, this site was one of my favorites sites, its up there with Met-Art. This site concentrates mainly on its pictures, the photographers take you to many exotic places and show amazing models there. They put on an erotic show for you and end with some stunning close ups. Most sets are full nude and some bring in light masterbation.

Most of the videos are just of the photo sets and in my opnion unnecessary. Also, They are not offered in a flash or streaming format and must be downloaded. On top of that they download as a zip file is and extra set you must take that can be highly annoying for most.

Unfortunately there isnt a discount offered for this site however a dual memberships can be purchased with Met-Art. Not a good idea in my opinion because both sites are so large and if your goal was to collect all of the content from both sites it would take just about two months. Now figure in some simple math: the dual sites monthly price is 30.00 and if it does take you two months that brings you to a total of 60.00. My advice is to purchase then seperately where Errotica Archives is 25 per month and MetArt has a discount for 20 per month.

Before I wrote this review I read all of the other user reviews in an attempt to make mine unique. I found that some reviews complain that the sets are "boring" that the models are just there smiling and not much more. I believe thats the point, the models are so stunning and the photographers are such geniuses on how the are able to use the natural lighting and geographical settings to really highlight the models true beautiful. Every set seems to be planned and executed flawlessly. If you read other users reviews who rated this site poorly, most of thier complaints have little validity. Yes I understand that the videos are a bit disappointing but this site is not meant to be a hardcore anal penetration site (not that there is anything wrong with those sites). Just look at the sites name "Errotica Archives" I believe the webmasters and photographers accomplished it precisely. They provide you with content that explores true feminine beauty, many close up shots, and many shots that show off the models amazing curves. I would say its very difficult to not fall in love with every model on this site.

Overall I do recommend this site for those who do enjoy Euro glamour, yes it could use a bit of tweaking and the videos could be given a new approach but other then that you will love this site. It is one of the best I have seen for this criteria and I look forwar to re joinning in a few months to get caught up on all of the updates. I have given this site a 93 because it isn't perfect but the effort given is flawless.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:17:12 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-18-10 08:17pm

REVIEW = 78 by graymane (20)

Pros:
+ No technical or login problems.
+ exceptionally good quality HD pics and videos.
+ Zip files.
+ Ample number beautiful models.
+ Frequent updates.
+ Picture images are done well, with multiple frames and poses.

Cons:
+ My major compliant is this site is chiefly a nude photo shoot. Models do very little except smile.
Videos, although sexy, are mostly rapid-fire takes of subjects who are too often changing positions. There are also too few videos for the number of models on hand.
Although most media formats were availsble, I found them complicated and download speed to be agonizingly slow. Hardcore is non-existent, as well as a dire shortage of erotic behavier.

Bottom Line:
I was given a combo, Met Art and this site for supposedly a discount. However, $29.95 is still too much. I'm getting woefully little I wanted or expected from this deal. For those who fancy superb photography and video of sexy ladies... then this is their bag. But I wouldn't recommend it to guys who want to get a rise out of what they're looking at --- So with that in mind, I wouldn't bother to unzip my fly.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:15:54 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

04-14-10 09:15pm

REVIEW = 95 by dougleen (0)

Pros:
Attractive Women in well shot photos and videos. Great video quality and clarity. Classy all around. Very sensual styling of models. Picture sets with x-large photos. Plenty of content with updates daily. You won't find better looking women photographed and filmed any better on the net.

Cons:
Could have more videos and be a little more hard core. If you want penetration this is not the site for you. Files are very large, but download speed is fine.

Bottom Line:
A well structured site with beautiful women shot in stunning sets and videos. Could be a little soft for some tastes.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Mon, 20 Jul 2009 12:30:26 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-20-09 12:30pm

REVIEW = 80 by hockeyman (2)

Pros:
Beautiful women
Great photography
High quality videos

Cons:
Not much Adult content
Some masturbation, but more modeling than anything else
Definitely no penetration

Bottom Line:
Well, the site has some of the most beautiful women you will ever see on the web. The lack of penetration is almost refreshing as the site focuses on the beauty of the women and modeling their gorgeous form.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Sat, 18 Jul 2009 07:14:13 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-18-09 07:14am

REVIEW = 78 by nutcrackr (8)

Pros:
-Clean site design
-Consistent quality
-Some interesting videos
-Great set locations
-Good variety in sets

Cons:
-Medium sets ~80pics (1 update per day)
-Very little tease (mostly nude)
-Too many ultra closeups
-Models are more curvy than other sites

Bottom Line:
Errotica Archives is an interesting site, those familiar with met-art may know Erro. Currently number 1 user voted photographer on Met-Art. He's generally a good photographer, he produces consistent good quality shots, there is a certain texture to his work. He is fairly good at bringing out the good parts of models. This might be making them smile, making them more natural, this is seen in some of his videos.

He does love his close ups, and I mean really close. Super high resolution pictures of vagina in particular. So close I can clearly make out the 3D shapes of the grains of sand nestled in between pubic hair. It's really quite something to behold. For some it's a huge bonus, but for me I'd rather see more of the model.

One set a day and sets aren't huge, they range from around 50 to 120 images. Recent sets are around the 70-80 shot mark which is decent. The variety in the sets is pretty good, different locations, models have fairly good poses. Available in small, medium, large and sometimes extra large (for huge resolution). Download sizes are not that big, even extra large might only be a few hundred MB, depends on the size of the set mainly.

There are quite a few well known European models, verunka, iveta, danae, monika, marketa among the current 214 model count. Many from met-art, along with a few new models. Generally the models very curvy in comparison to met-art / hegre-art, which I don't enjoy as much. Another thing is that the sets feature very little clothing in general. Many sets are nude from picture one taking out another huge variable element and tease factor. Of the last 10 sets, only 2 had some form of clothing.

Overall I'd recommend the site. It does support download managers (flashget) and quality sets overall. The combination of lighting, location and Erro magic can produce some real gems. Navigation is alright, not having to reload the page if you change resolution is handy, but having to click twice to get to the set is a nuisance. Members area is the same as free tour and you can re-rate models. Personally I'd rather see more tease with clothes, less ultra close genital shots and perhaps some more petite models.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:41:34 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-07-09 08:41pm

REVIEW = 80 by oogles (9)

Pros:
+ gorgeous women
+ high quality photos and photography
+ video
+ daily updates
+ women are natural (breasts)

Cons:
+ a little too much bend over 'brown-eye' shots for my taste. I prefer to see some more modest photos ~ more asses and less assholes and pussy closeups
+ models are mostly shaved
+ updates could be more frequent
+ videos are mostly just the photoshoot which is interesting at first, but gets old fast

Bottom Line:
A good site to try for awhile, but you may get bored after awhile. I let my membership lapse for a few months now, but may go back for a month in the future to see what's new.

Photos are great, this is not the site for you if you're looking for spankworthy video.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:21:03 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

01-17-09 11:21pm

REVIEW = 90 by aesop7 (10)

Pros:
- ohmygod gorgeous babes
- with curves
- umm, what else do you want???????
- The photog here is an Artist with an Eye for Beauty, Anatomy and Color (see below)
- Plenty of content

Cons:
- no hardcore
- lot of vids are just filming the photoshoot

Bottom Line:
Some of the most beautiful pictures I've seen are here. A few of the girls (take Perla for example) are jawdropping.
Now, here, to me, is what sets this site apart: The photographer here has an Incredible Eye. He just seems to pick poses that I love. And he has a unique eye for color: many of the shots, at first blush, seem... washed out. But give them a chance and keep looking... he sees something most other glam photographers miss. I can't describe it well... perhaps... the way the color palate he uses makes the women appear even more beautiful. If you watch a super saturated site like, say, Hand on Hardcore [great site], and pull Down the saturation, and and pull the tint away from pink just a bit, you get a whole different feeling... or, am I just watching Way too much of this stuff?#%&*^$(*&*(&@& OMG!... Anyway, what I mean is that his choice of colors makes many of these pics even sexier. The vids, to me, are just a throw-in, even though they're 1280x720. It's the Pics that I dig here. And they are Beautiful.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:53:37 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-13-08 07:53pm

REVIEW = 90 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some)

Cons:
-sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some)

Bottom Line:
Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:02:51 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-05-07 09:02am

REVIEW = 80 by Denner (227)

Pros:
Exclusive content - and I mean exclusive!
Even the girls here - a good amount are exclusive for this site.
Fine/great video-quality, AVI 1280x720.
Good photo-quality
Easy navigation
Zip for photos also

And a pretty good price: $19.95 for a month.

Cons:
Download of videos comes in zip-files - a little annoying.
Photo-navigation/photo preview is dammed slow. You have to wait for all thumbnail to download in what seems to be the size of full photos.
But foremost cons: A lot of the videos are based on photoshoots.

Bottom Line:
This COULD be a swell site.
But the majority of videos based on photoshoots tends to downgrade it quite a lot.
I like to see some of these fine eateuropean girls doing sexy stuff, strip and masturbating, but it's spoiled in most videos by a guy walking around taking photos and telling the girl how to act and what to do - too bad.
It too bad because Errotica Archives has some very rare girls here. And it's great that some of the rarest ones has a few good videos, like the skinny blond Olga doing two fine beach-videos - maybe the best videos in the whole site.

As a video-freak I'm a little disapointed with most - but I somewhat turned to photos on this special site. And the photos are great - in quality and style.
But bottom line: If you're into videos it's still OK, but just ok. If you're more into photos this site is close to great. If you go for young easteuropean teens.

And again: This site could grow quite a lot with less videos based on photoshoots.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:16:45 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-13-07 06:16pm

REVIEW = 85 by cblodg (9)

Pros:
-Absolutely gorgeous women
-Photo quality is excelent
-Huge archive of photos
-Fair price for what you get
-Navigation is fairly easy

Cons:
-site not updated quite as often as one would hope
-lighting quality varies between sets
-Videos are interesting (see bottom line)

Bottom Line:
Well... this is one of those sites that you run across and can be amazed by the amount of absolutely gorgeous girls that are on it. The site is primarily a photo site, on the softcore side. This is okay, because in never tries to sell itself otherwise.

Though this is a photo heavy site, there are still some videos. This where my "videos are interesting" comes in. Most sites will do a seperate shoot for the photos and the videos. That's not the case on this site as the average vid is simply a same shoot of the photo set.

If you like softcore sites that are photo heavy, then this is a great site for you! And if you're curious as to a good model to start at; I recomend Danae.

Lots of content for a fare price.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Thu, 03 May 2007 05:16:59 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

05-03-07 05:16am

REVIEW = 81 by Drooler (218)

Pros:
+Beautiful Eurobabes most of the time
+Daily updates from August 2005; fewer per month from June 2004
+zip files in 3 sizes (site began with 2000px as "large"; from mid-2006, large is usually 4000px)
+Full length videos in wma, avi, and Quicktime; they look good in full screen mode

Cons:
-Videos are of the photoshoots. While they're not hyper-edited, they tend to be slow and awkward in the motion as you watch the model try different poses. You also see other people (photographer, etc.) in them.
-Incomplete updates are first posted (usually missing the zips); zips are added the same day, though. (A minor complaint, perhaps, but it's not good practice.)
-Lighting is sometimes too dark; sometimes too light. And sometimes blurriness is a problem

Bottom Line:
This is a completely softcore site with NO TOYS. I consider that a plus.

It's also primarily a photo site. A typical month will have 5 videos and 15-16 photosets. The videos are subtitled, so you can brush up on your Czech ;).

I'd definitely recommend it to people who like softcore nude photography. The content buildup and the price of $19.99 a month make it worth it.

You can get a sense of the content by visiting the site and clicking "updates." That's a plus, too. (Wish every site did that.)

With better control of lighting and focus, and fewer of the somewhat boring videos, this site would have gotten a score in the 90's.

Follow-Up:
I've lowered the score from 87 to 81. Gallery thumbs partially "X" out too often; back then fwd buttons needed to fix that. Thumbs are too cropped, not WYSIWYG; must open to see whole pic. Too many pics of models looking away, or just writhing around. Not enough "spark"/errotic appeal, though sometimes there is.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply