PU - Errotica Archives - New Reviews

Errotica Archives Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:53:37 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-13-08 07:53pm

REVIEW = 90 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some)

Cons:
-sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some)

Bottom Line:
Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Mon, 05 Nov 2007 09:02:51 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-05-07 09:02am

REVIEW = 80 by Denner (146)

Pros:
Exclusive content - and I mean exclusive!
Even the girls here - a good amount are exclusive for this site.
Fine/great video-quality, AVI 1280x720.
Good photo-quality
Easy navigation
Zip for photos also

And a pretty good price: $19.95 for a month.

Cons:
Download of videos comes in zip-files - a little annoying.
Photo-navigation/photo preview is dammed slow. You have to wait for all thumbnail to download in what seems to be the size of full photos.
But foremost cons: A lot of the videos are based on photoshoots.

Bottom Line:
This COULD be a swell site.
But the majority of videos based on photoshoots tends to downgrade it quite a lot.
I like to see some of these fine eateuropean girls doing sexy stuff, strip and masturbating, but it's spoiled in most videos by a guy walking around taking photos and telling the girl how to act and what to do - too bad.
It too bad because Errotica Archives has some very rare girls here. And it's great that some of the rarest ones has a few good videos, like the skinny blond Olga doing two fine beach-videos - maybe the best videos in the whole site.

As a video-freak I'm a little disapointed with most - but I somewhat turned to photos on this special site. And the photos are great - in quality and style.
But bottom line: If you're into videos it's still OK, but just ok. If you're more into photos this site is close to great. If you go for young easteuropean teens.

And again: This site could grow quite a lot with less videos based on photoshoots.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:16:45 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

10-13-07 06:16pm

REVIEW = 85 by cblodg (9)

Pros:
-Absolutely gorgeous women
-Photo quality is excelent
-Huge archive of photos
-Fair price for what you get
-Navigation is fairly easy

Cons:
-site not updated quite as often as one would hope
-lighting quality varies between sets
-Videos are interesting (see bottom line)

Bottom Line:
Well... this is one of those sites that you run across and can be amazed by the amount of absolutely gorgeous girls that are on it. The site is primarily a photo site, on the softcore side. This is okay, because in never tries to sell itself otherwise.

Though this is a photo heavy site, there are still some videos. This where my "videos are interesting" comes in. Most sites will do a seperate shoot for the photos and the videos. That's not the case on this site as the average vid is simply a same shoot of the photo set.

If you like softcore sites that are photo heavy, then this is a great site for you! And if you're curious as to a good model to start at; I recomend Danae.

Lots of content for a fare price.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Thu, 03 May 2007 05:16:59 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

05-03-07 05:16am

REVIEW = 81 by Drooler (156)

Pros:
+Beautiful Eurobabes most of the time
+Daily updates from August 2005; fewer per month from June 2004
+zip files in 3 sizes (site began with 2000px as "large"; from mid-2006, large is usually 4000px)
+Full length videos in wma, avi, and Quicktime; they look good in full screen mode

Cons:
-Videos are of the photoshoots. While they're not hyper-edited, they tend to be slow and awkward in the motion as you watch the model try different poses. You also see other people (photographer, etc.) in them.
-Incomplete updates are first posted (usually missing the zips); zips are added the same day, though. (A minor complaint, perhaps, but it's not good practice.)
-Lighting is sometimes too dark; sometimes too light. And sometimes blurriness is a problem

Bottom Line:
This is a completely softcore site with NO TOYS. I consider that a plus.

It's also primarily a photo site. A typical month will have 5 videos and 15-16 photosets. The videos are subtitled, so you can brush up on your Czech ;).

I'd definitely recommend it to people who like softcore nude photography. The content buildup and the price of $19.99 a month make it worth it.

You can get a sense of the content by visiting the site and clicking "updates." That's a plus, too. (Wish every site did that.)

With better control of lighting and focus, and fewer of the somewhat boring videos, this site would have gotten a score in the 90's.

Follow-Up:
I've lowered the score from 87 to 81. Gallery thumbs partially "X" out too often; back then fwd buttons needed to fix that. Thumbs are too cropped, not WYSIWYG; must open to see whole pic. Too many pics of models looking away, or just writhing around. Not enough "spark"/errotic appeal, though sometimes there is.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply