PU - Errotica Archives - All Activity

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:01:52 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

07-24-08 12:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (154)

To Denner (146):

Yes, it is like that old car. You're going along, and everything seems to be working well, and then ... screeech! ... you come upon the scene of an accident! Image number 23!

"I couldn't get a good look at the girl's face, officer. There was so much excessive light shining, with heavy contrasting shadows. And it was all just a big blur anyway."

View Thread (2)

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:57:53 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

07-24-08 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (146)

To Drooler (154):

Thanks for that update on EA....
Reading the first part - I thought: maybe EA has come around with better content, better allround....
But it seems to be a socalled "facelift" - like when a four-five year old car-model needs reneweal - we change a little bit here and a little bit there......but when it comes down to facts...most is just the same old story.

View Thread (2)

Errotica Archives Comment

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:43:26 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

07-24-08 02:43am

COMMENT by Drooler (154)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Comment

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:31:03 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

01-27-08 08:31am

COMMENT by Rocker (0)

most pic resolution sux

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:05:37 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 10:05am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To Denner (146):

I was looking through the preview that's where I saw the 4000px photos.

View Thread (6)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:04:42 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 10:04am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To Denner (146):

Earl Miller is an excellent photographer. He does a lot of hardcore. A lot of American pornstars, that could be a plus or minus for you. Older stuff too.

View Thread (6)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:28:50 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 08:28am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To jd1961 (78):

Hey again...

I'm not too well educated about photo-sizes and more - but according to my ACDSee the photo are 1515x1010 - the quality is pretty good - or very good. We're not talking about quality as in Pier 999 - but these photos are "clean-cut" with no alterration...or "styling"...or whatever

Denner

View Thread (6)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:22:07 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 08:22am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To jd1961 (78):

Hey Buddy

Thanks! - and yes, for sure! If you dig videos of photoshoots, this is a good/ok place. Especially if you take the price in consideration.

And by the way - you mention Earl Miller. Never had any experience with that site. What do you say?

Denner

View Thread (6)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:56:41 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 05:56am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To Denner (146):

Wow...I saw 4000px in there. How large are the hi-res photo zips?

View Thread (6)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:47:20 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-07-07 05:47am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (78)

To Denner (146):

Another fine review Denner...I happen to like photoshoot videos. Earl Miller and Suze Randall do great ones. So, if you did like this kind of video, would you give it a higher score?

View Thread (6)

RE: Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:18:12 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

10-13-07 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by cblodg (9)

To Denner (146):

gotta agree! This is a great site. I too am a little surprised that TBP has not given this site a review yet.

View Thread (1)

Errotica Archives Comment

Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:54:10 PDT

Errotica Archives (4)

10-09-07 11:54am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.

Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)

Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply