PU - Errotica Archives - All Activity

Errotica Archives Comment

Thu, 22 Dec 2011 13:56:23 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

12-22-11 01:56pm

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Holiday special offer

There is a special by Met-Art for Erroctica Archives for $14.97. The only thing is, that the special is received through your email if you signed up for Met-Art's promo offers. I would love to help anyone out, but I can't post a link to the offer.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: The Collector's Review

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:07:22 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

06-24-11 01:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To The Collector (7):

Excellent review. Not been here myself since November 2008 but back then it was one of my favorite sites and would pretty much agree with your opinion of the site.

View Thread (3)

RE: The Collector's Review

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:50:49 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

06-24-11 11:50am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To The Collector (7):

Very impressive review. A lot of nice opinions and details that give a clear picture of the site. Welcome to PU.

View Thread (3)

RE: The Collector's Review

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:48:38 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

06-24-11 11:48am

REVIEW REPLY by The Collector (7)

To The Collector (7):

By the way sorry to all for being so silent I have been busy with my last two sites I'm on right now: Jenni's Secrets, hot girl but not the best site at all and Katie Fey and the 85 bonus sites, most are solo girl sites and its taking fffooorrrrever to complete. My next 3 reviews that are about to be cranked out are for: Fantasy Girl Pass, Real Peachez, and of course Met-Art!!!!

View Thread (3)

RE: Denner's Review

Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:06:15 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

06-24-11 11:06am

REVIEW REPLY by The Collector (7)

To Denner (227):

I agree with you about Olga! she is amazing and I have only found her on one other site, Met-Art

View Thread (7)

RE: A Real Winner

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:44:31 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

03-31-11 12:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To bobbylassen (0):

Can't argue with you there, still one of my all time favorite sites although its been a couple of years since i was there.

View Thread (1)

Errotica Archives Comment

Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:02:48 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

03-31-11 11:02am

COMMENT by bobbylassen (0)

A Real Winner

Fifteen years of porn surfing and this is what I was looking for the whole time. Absolutely stunning in every respect. Hell, I'd recommend this site to my mom if she went both ways.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Breathtaking

Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:56:17 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

12-07-10 09:56am

COMMENT REPLY by gregdd (0)

To tangub (103):

Good thing about technology is everything is getting better and more hi-res. The new videos are awesome, but you're always limited to the creativity and eroticism of both the models and the photographers. They too are improving due to the competition and exposure generated by the internet.

View Thread (2)

RE: Breathtaking

Sat, 04 Dec 2010 04:58:30 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

12-04-10 04:58am

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To gregdd (0):

I have to agree with you there on the photography, i still rate this as one of my all time favorite sites. I don't remember being too enthralled about the videos though but that's probably just me not being a video person.

View Thread (2)

Errotica Archives Comment

Fri, 03 Dec 2010 11:22:23 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

12-03-10 11:22am

COMMENT by gregdd (0)

Breathtaking

This site is truly amazing and presents the beauty and passion of the femal form like never before. The models are delicious and the photography is top notch, not to mention the stunning quality of the erotic movies.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: graymane's Review

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:15:42 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-22-10 01:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by graymane (20)

To tangub (103):

I'm not too much disappointed choosing the site as I am not getting what I expected. I have to blame myself for not doing more research, and should have stressed that more firmly in the review. It's indeed a beautiful site and seemingly lives up to it's reputation.
Thanks for your input.

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 03:31:35 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-22-10 03:31am

REVIEW REPLY by tangub (103)

To graymane (20):

Sorry to hear you were disappointed with this site. I was there 2 or 3 years ago and still rate it as one of my favorite sites.

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:19:15 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-19-10 10:19am

REVIEW REPLY by graymane (20)

To Capn (27):

I probably was a little too brutal with my review....I went in unprepared, so it's my own fault and frankly should'nt of come down on the site as I did. They're very good at what they DO --unfortunately it doesn't DO it for me.
Thanks for your thoughts.

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:51:59 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-19-10 09:51am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To graymane (20):

Looking in the tour area, it does look to be good quality photography.

Do they ever break out of the cliched nude glamour shoot approach though?

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:45:34 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-19-10 09:45am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To lk2fireone (116):

A very lucid assesment.

Worthy of being the start of a thread in the forum, I reckon! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 22:44:10 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-18-10 10:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To graymane (20):

That's what we all want, a site "to do something for me". But as we get older, that changes. When I was an early teen, looking at a copy of the Sears catalog (the women's swimwear or lingerie sections) would do it for me. But now I can look at a catalog of Victoria's Secret, which is far more colorful and explicit than what I ever saw in the Sears catalog, and
Victoria's Secret is just a catalog, even though it has beautiful women in lovely lingerie.

I used to be exclusively softcore. Then I joined PU, and I've been getting into hardcore. I'm still mainly softcore, but I'm looking for new material and new sites that I hope I will find entertaining. Most of what I find doesn't really appeal to me. But I keep searching. Because there is a lot of good content out there, somewhere. :)

As far as your score for this site, that's an entirely personal opinion. I used to worry when I gave a site a score whether it was the "right" score. But then I finally realized that a site score is very subjective. Some people think a site's score is based on objective factors, and they even have a rigorous system to create a score based on specific factors. But I personally believe a score is both subjective and objective, as long as the basic factors of download speed, ease of navigation, basic quality of contents, basic amount of contents are at the site. And each person's standards of acceptable varies, as does the person's tastes and opinions.

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:58:43 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-18-10 09:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by graymane (20)

To lk2fireone (116):

You're probably right, 1k, I guess I was a little hard on the site (pun intended).
And in retrospect, having it to do over I would give them a better grade. It is indeed a beautiful site, it's just I kept stumbling over obstacles that thwarted my expections. I've visited the site less than a dozen times, so inasmuch my month is almost up, that should yield some indication of my interest.
Contrarily, I do favor softcore...it's just I want it to do something for me. If you've read my threads you'll get a good idea of what I like and don't like.....and again, you must've read me wrong or I likely laid things out in a way I prefer hardcore...actually nothing could be further from the truth. I like it in moderation, and if it's done with style and a little class. But we both know scarce that is, don't we.
Thanks, 1k, for taking the time to comment. I appreciate it.

View Thread (8)

RE: graymane's Review

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:09:52 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-18-10 09:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To graymane (20):

Sorry you were disappointed, graymane. You did get a nice price at $29.95 for two major softcore sites. Unfortunately, Metart is famous for its non-erotic videos of lovely young models.

From what you write, it sounds like you should avoid softcore sites, and look for something harder. Most softcore sites, like Femjoy, MPL Studios, etc. would probably be too soft for you.

There are plenty of sites out there. The problem is finding the ones that appeal to your personal tastes, at a reasonable price.

There's also a ton of crap out there. Metart and Errotica Archives are quality sites, they just don't meet your tastes.

View Thread (8)

RE: dougleen's Review

Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:54:10 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

04-16-10 10:54pm

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To dougleen (0):

Hi score, but little on details , more needed please.

View Thread (2)

RE: dougleen's Review

Thu, 15 Apr 2010 04:41:51 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

04-15-10 04:41am

REVIEW REPLY by BadMrFrosty (42)

To dougleen (0):

A little lite on the details there chief. Care to expand on why anyone would want to spend 20$ on this site instead of beer?

View Thread (2)

RE: aesop7's Review

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 23:02:41 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

01-18-09 11:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To aesop7 (10):

The approach to color is something I've noticed and also liked. Your comments were interesting and got me thinking about that more.

And the girls he choses are almost always excellent. I'd be a permanent member if he'd only do certain poses of the backside more often (Ellena "Striptease" number 83 is great example). This he's done less and less.

I used to say that "no hardcore" was a con a few times, but I finally stopped. How often do we see anyone making a "no softcore" comment about a hardcore site? I think a softcore site should be judged on its own terms.

View Thread (1)

RE: Just Beautiful

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:55:25 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

01-10-09 07:55am

COMMENT REPLY by Ergo Proxy (13)

To TalonIcefire (6):

Looks really nice, think I will give it a try.

View Thread (1)

Errotica Archives Comment

Fri, 09 Jan 2009 15:56:02 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

01-09-09 03:56pm

COMMENT by TalonIcefire (6)

Just Beautiful

Site was part of the MET Portal along with MET Art & MET Models when I had membership from Oct-Nov 2008. Only issue with the site was the model naming index. No uniformity. Otherwise, models are simply stunning. Will be returning in 6 months for the updates.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:01:52 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-24-08 12:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Yes, it is like that old car. You're going along, and everything seems to be working well, and then ... screeech! ... you come upon the scene of an accident! Image number 23!

"I couldn't get a good look at the girl's face, officer. There was so much excessive light shining, with heavy contrasting shadows. And it was all just a big blur anyway."

View Thread (2)

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:57:53 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-24-08 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks for that update on EA....
Reading the first part - I thought: maybe EA has come around with better content, better allround....
But it seems to be a socalled "facelift" - like when a four-five year old car-model needs reneweal - we change a little bit here and a little bit there......but when it comes down to facts...most is just the same old story.

View Thread (2)

Errotica Archives Comment

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:43:26 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

07-24-08 02:43am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

New Look

Out with the old, in with the new. Errotica Archives now has a new look, which is more visually appealing overall. The thumbs are easier to see in the galleries.

The interface has also changed some, but I don't think it's all for the better. Used to be you could click a photo size (small, medium, or large) and then click a thumb which would show the full pic in a new window; then you could repeat that with other thumbs.

But now if you click "large" and view a pic from a thumb and go back, it RESETS to the smaller default pic size every time. That's a nuisance.

And if you choose "zipped" within the thumbs page, it takes you to the previous "cover" page where the zip links are located. It's a minor bother, I suppose, but why not do it as FemJoy now does, with all of the zip sizes linked right on the thumbs page?

There's also a search engine where you can select characteristics of the models (hair color, etc. -- and even Zodiac sign!). Or you can browse by name, A-Z.

But this is all about the design. Content-wise, and as Rocker pointed out in the previous comment, the photo resolution "sux." I just looked at the Wanda "Rapidly" gallery and found some large pics to have too much blurriness!

So here we've gone again. Another site gets a face lift, but the quality of the content -- the most important thing! -- is still being neglected.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Comment

Sun, 27 Jan 2008 08:31:03 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

01-27-08 08:31am

COMMENT by Rocker (0)

most pic resolution sux

Big pics, but no resolution.

Site offer huge pics, but most of the resolution sux!

No resolution in the big pics, then why big? I can size up a pic with low pixels with freekin MS Picture Manager and get a big pic with crappy resolution.

The models are gorgeous, posed well and lighting is terrific. Fix the resolution problem and you'll have beauty-freeks streaming into your site.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:05:37 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 10:05am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

I was looking through the preview that's where I saw the 4000px photos.

View Thread (7)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:04:42 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 10:04am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

Earl Miller is an excellent photographer. He does a lot of hardcore. A lot of American pornstars, that could be a plus or minus for you. Older stuff too.

View Thread (7)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:28:50 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 08:28am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To jd1961 (95):

Hey again...

I'm not too well educated about photo-sizes and more - but according to my ACDSee the photo are 1515x1010 - the quality is pretty good - or very good. We're not talking about quality as in Pier 999 - but these photos are "clean-cut" with no alterration...or "styling"...or whatever

Denner

View Thread (7)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:22:07 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 08:22am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To jd1961 (95):

Hey Buddy

Thanks! - and yes, for sure! If you dig videos of photoshoots, this is a good/ok place. Especially if you take the price in consideration.

And by the way - you mention Earl Miller. Never had any experience with that site. What do you say?

Denner

View Thread (7)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:56:41 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 05:56am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

Wow...I saw 4000px in there. How large are the hi-res photo zips?

View Thread (7)

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 07 Nov 2007 05:47:20 PST

Errotica Archives (2)

11-07-07 05:47am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

Another fine review Denner...I happen to like photoshoot videos. Earl Miller and Suze Randall do great ones. So, if you did like this kind of video, would you give it a higher score?

View Thread (7)

RE: Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Sat, 13 Oct 2007 18:18:12 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-13-07 06:18pm

COMMENT REPLY by cblodg (9)

To Denner (227):

gotta agree! This is a great site. I too am a little surprised that TBP has not given this site a review yet.

View Thread (1)

Errotica Archives Comment

Tue, 09 Oct 2007 11:54:10 PDT

Errotica Archives (2)

10-09-07 11:54am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Hugh amount/good quality/fair price

Just joined this site that still not has a review by TBP.
But see Droolers review - which is very accurate, of course.

Since the review things has grown at EA with more videos and photo-sets - and above all: Some new fine models (easteuropeans)

Still have the problems with strange/slow navigation concerning photos - and to many videos based on photoshoots.
But the yummy models in fine quality videos and fair quality photos makes this site worth $19.95 (a month)
Be back with a review...
See ok preview.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply