Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/mrbigdickshotchicks/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_28099 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28099 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/mrbigdickshotchicks/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/mrbigdickshotchicks.jpg" alt="Enter Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/mrbigdickshotchicks/"><b>Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 12-07-08&nbsp;&nbsp;06:46am</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 78</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=763">DigglerFL</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=763">17</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> - Good Content with hot chicks<br /> - Some attempt at a story line<br /> - a lot of scenes <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> - Hardly any updates<br /> - Poor Quality Videos<br /> - Best quality is flash, which are not savable <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> This site is part of a large package (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/allrealitypass/">Allrealitypass</a>) and there is only 1 update for the entire package per weekday (none on weekends). The quality is not HD and all but the most recent movies are very low quality.<br /> <br /> I have a particular problem with sites that have better quality trailers than the actual movies. It seems like an obvious effort to deceive, and thats always a negative. The truth is, once you've hit the archives there's really nothing to keep you wanted to renew here. Another 1 month wonder. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12230"><b>Visit Mr Big Dick's Hot Chicks</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=28099">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=28099">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Sun, 07 Dec 2008 06:46:29 PST