PU - Super Glam - All Activity

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:20:04 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-02-10 09:20am

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To Denner (0):

Good point I will go ahead and post this on my review. Once I downloaded this website I'll share the spoils for free.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 02 Jan 2010 08:58:16 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-02-10 08:58am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (0)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Is this site still alive?
And who keeps it alive - got to be new members - only. First time as a member I was disappointed, second time even more - third time generally pissed...69 is not a high score, but it might deserve a warning, too...
And the info from xbigvmanx about 'no more updates' should give a hint: stay away!

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 01 Jan 2010 12:02:20 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-01-10 12:02pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (0)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

I got burned the same way two years ago, by overly positive reviews. And I was pretty darned PO'd about it.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 01 Jan 2010 10:40:07 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-01-10 10:40am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Yeah, I've been putting comments on the reviews of this site about the hideously poor rate of updates since at least mid-2008 trying to warn people about this site. Oh, well - I tried.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:58:06 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-01-10 07:58am

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To Drooler (0):

You know what surprises me is this website is still up and running also some of the trustworthy review sites gave of 80 and above which shouldn't be the case. Rabbitreviews.com gave it a 90! Hoes.com gave it a 81. So I am a little miffed at this. If the website got daily updates with the content that's there it would definitely deserve those scores. Still I am going to take this website for what its worth and use it to my advantage.

View Thread (6)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:48:47 PST

Super Glam (0)

01-01-10 07:48am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (0)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

They only label their thumbs as 4000 pixels. It's complete bullshit.

View Thread (6)

RE: So what's the verdict?

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:43:41 PDT

Super Glam (0)

08-21-09 11:43am

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (0)

To exotics4me (0):

Thanks a bunch for the info, as never being a member before and with your info provided, I believe I shall add it to the list. Once again, appreciate the detailed response.

View Thread (4)

RE: So what's the verdict?

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:00:58 PDT

Super Glam (0)

08-20-09 01:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (0)

To GCode (0):

Hey GCode, sorry about the delay on this one. Good news, they've now got Epoch handling their billing again. As far as the site goes, it is a bittersweet site for me. I loved the photos, beautiful colors in the background, but most of all, the outfits the models started out in were some of the best I've seen. I would have never known that meant anything to me if not for an Eve Angel photo set I have from Super Glam. She has on a blue tank top, black workout shorts that barely cover her butt and there was mesh involved too. I had never seen Eve like that. It was very casual looking, but she still looked glamorous. The site focuses on the very top tier of Euro models. The video quality is a stretch to say average. But, I did just open one to see how it looks, they use a bit of a letterbox on the sides, which really, when stretched to full screen actually helps it look less grainy since it isn't trying to fit the whole screen.

The quality of the content on the videos is mostly graphic masturbation. The Eve one I just opened even has rubbing her butthole some, which is kind of rare for Eve. The best way to put it now, with Epoch handling the billing, if I had never joined it, I would in a second. The content is exclusive as far as I know. All videos that I'm looking at start out dressed, little stripping, dancing, then into masturbation. I say bittersweet because I always thought they could be one of the top Euro sites with even 4 weekly updates.

View Thread (4)

RE: So what's the verdict?

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:25:43 PDT

Super Glam (0)

08-11-09 07:25pm

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (0)

To exotics4me (0):

Ah, I totally overlooked the video stats on TBP and you are completely right. It would be a probably a one time stay so the updates are not a huge issue for me. You said going back, so you have been a member, how was the billing processor when you were a member before? I am extremely nervous about this myself with a certain past experience straying away from the usual suspects. I trust your judgement and with your experience with the photo quality combined with the average videos, thumbs up for one a month stay if the billing processor is non-problematic?

View Thread (4)

RE: So what's the verdict?

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 23:04:30 PDT

Super Glam (0)

08-10-09 11:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (0)

To GCode (0):

GCode,

I've considered going back several times, but they are not using a billing processor that I'm familiar with so it has kind of put them on hold for now. They still aren't giving many new updates, only about 9 photo and videos combined per month. The first time join is pretty good though. Especially for those A-List Euro models and their content is exclusive. Video quality was slightly below average the last time I was on it though.

View Thread (4)

RE: Definitely making forward progress

Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:51:39 PST

Super Glam (0)

03-05-09 03:51am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To exotics4me (0):

If you go through the trouble contacting this Global Cash-thing - please let me hear the result.
I'm still "terrified" of unknown payment processors.....
Cheers!

View Thread (4)

RE: Definitely making forward progress

Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:28:02 PST

Super Glam (0)

03-04-09 10:28am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey Denner,

I was going to join, but the payment processor is a different one than usual. It says Global Cash Limited or something like that. I'm going to send a support email and ask about it. I had just noticed the new content on the previews and like you, was impressed. I really like Tea, she is one of the few newer models that has caught my attention. I will let you know as soon as I hear back about the payment processor.

View Thread (4)

RE: Definitely making forward progress

Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:05:40 PST

Super Glam (0)

03-03-09 08:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To exotics4me (0):

Hey again, exotics4me...
Just spend some time browsing - and, ok it's not the sweetest deal with the weekly updates - a little slow, after all. Good price, though...

BUT those updates are something else: took a look at the sample videos: just WAUW! - Tea in the bathroom, or a new Eufrat (Drooler, the old Eufrat-fan, you got to see her here!) - or the sweet Bijou....

BTW: Are you a member now? And are all the later videos/photosets of this great standard/quality?

View Thread (4)

RE: Definitely making forward progress

Tue, 03 Mar 2009 05:49:14 PST

Super Glam (0)

03-03-09 05:49am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To exotics4me (0):

Thanks for this fine update from good ol' exotics4me....
Admit, I'm surprised to read it, but, man - it sounds really good. If that site finally has taken a hold of themselves it's just good news, because ONCE they had some great stuff.
Running in there to take a look at the site again....

View Thread (4)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:21:19 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-07-08 10:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by IKnoPorn (0)

To PinkPanther (0):

Thanks, PinkPanther, you were right. I have a list of "experimental" sites to check out, this was at the top of it, just to see. The photo sets, as few as the good ones are, are pretty hot. Really odd though that their base price would be so high with so little content. They're not even in the same league with many bigger sites (like 1byday) that give you so much more for your money.

Funny thing, after submitting this review, my download speeds have gone down the toilet. Maybe the webmaster read my review??? LOL

View Thread (2)

RE: IKnoPorn's Review

Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:46:48 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-07-08 09:46pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To IKnoPorn (0):

Damn - I tried to warn you in my comments in the other review - the update rate of this site is just ridiculously poor.

View Thread (2)

RE: New Site

Wed, 02 Jul 2008 21:48:20 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-02-08 09:48pm

COMMENT REPLY by Canyon (0)

To PinkPanther (0):

PinkPanther, thanks for your detailed response. I currently have or have had memberships at a number of those sites. The Femjoy/Met-Arts of the world have some amazing girls but the sites bore me after awhile. I would prefer the FTV and ALS style sites more.

FTV updates once per week and ALS although they have daily updates probably only 2 are something new.

I guess I was impressed with what the guy from Superglam was telling me as I have always loved some of the specific girls they have featured. "Veronica Fasterova" :)

I hope the updates improve like he told me they were. I spoke with him today and was told that the ownership had changed in the past month and the new site would have more frequent updates.

In June it looks like they had 3 video and 3 picture updates.

I'm going to have to go check out a few of the ones you mentioned that I'm not familiar with :)
Can I borrow ur credid card? hehe

View Thread (4)

RE: New Site

Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:41:53 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-02-08 07:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To Canyon (0):

Sites that update daily with super-hot girls & exclusive content

Met Art
LSG Models
MPL Studios
Femjoy
Babes.tv (6 days a week - 3 days of pics, 3 days of vids)

Sites that update several times a week with super-hot girls & exclusive content

ALS Scan (with 1 remastered update a week)
FTV Girls
Watch4Beauty

And then you look at Superglam's updates

sometimes 3 days, sometimes 15 days between pic updates
sometimes 2 days, sometimes 2 weeks between vid updates

You can convince yourself that's reasonable if you want. I'll vote with my wallet and stay the hell away from it. It's just not a reasonable rate of updates as compared to what else is available.

View Thread (4)

RE: New Site

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:42:14 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-01-08 09:42pm

COMMENT REPLY by Canyon (0)

To PinkPanther (0):

Yes, I agree but the other sites that I know of that update daily are regular hardcore sites with dvd content.

Sites with exclusive content of superhot girls only update once or twice a week unless like ALS they are updating old remastered videos and such

View Thread (4)

RE: New Site

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 18:36:11 PDT

Super Glam (0)

07-01-08 06:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To Canyon (0):

Regular updates coming? As Denner noted in his other comment, their update schedule is a joke when you compare it to other high quality glamour sites that give at least one new update a day. That's pretty much a deal-breaker for me.

View Thread (4)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:21:22 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 06:21am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To mr smut (0):

Thanks for the congrats, bro.....
And - Inessa - she's a doll - but I know for sure she's in quite a few sites - right now I simply cannot remmember her other alias'es.
Or which sites....

I bet the Drooler can help you there!!!!

View Thread (6)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 06:13:26 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 06:13am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (0)

To Denner (0):

Yes, that's true and I guess I'd like to search for more on Inessa which is my favourite girl from superglam.com. They should fire their whole marketing department and start to do regular updates.

Congrats for having all the badges now! You deserve them :-)

View Thread (6)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:53:48 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 05:53am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To mr smut (0):

Exactly, mr smut....It's amazing - in the negative meaning of the word - that this site still carpet-bomb former users with statements of how great the site is - and the reality is completly in another neck of the woods....
And agree - some very fine models here in exclusive video/photosets - but - bottom line - we can find the same models elsewhere. (Lucky, for one - at for exampel 1ByDay - and I've seen her in some b/g hc too - do not remember where right now....

View Thread (6)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:23:57 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 05:23am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Tnanks for that one, my honorable "brother-in-arms"......!!!!!!!!

View Thread (6)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 05:00:23 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 05:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Thanks, Denner, for the latest on Super-Laggardly SuperGlam. They're pretty naughty, but in the wrong way!

Speaking of things that took far too long, congrats also on finally getting your "Trusted User" badge. Anybody around here have issues with trusting m'man Denner? Well, then, I got a problem with that!

View Thread (6)

RE: Still trying, but.....

Sat, 07 Jun 2008 03:56:48 PDT

Super Glam (0)

06-07-08 03:56am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (0)

To Denner (0):

Thanks for this warning. I can't believe that they now do less updates than they used to when I was a member there. It's a shame because they have a lot of real sexy models to offer *ggrrr*

View Thread (6)

RE: Not much new here!

Wed, 21 May 2008 08:43:51 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-21-08 08:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Right you are, pal....and nothing to go back for.

View Thread (5)

RE: Not much new here!

Tue, 20 May 2008 11:51:16 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-20-08 11:51am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey, Denner!

Thanks for the latest news on one of my favorite web sites! ;-)

The Rabbit rate might get some folks in quicker to visit this update Turtle. They should paint themselves a wall while they're at it so they can watch it dry.

I haven't been anywhere near since, what, sometime last year? And I'm not goin' back, either!

View Thread (5)

RE: Not much new here!

Tue, 20 May 2008 10:50:57 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-20-08 10:50am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (0)

To Denner (0):

Oh, and b.t.w. at $38.80 per month I'd also expect to have pictures sized at >3000px on the long side while still being sharp and crystal clear. ALS is a good example as they offer lots of content in good quality and up to 4 full picture sets per week plus 7 vids and the new stuff being HD quality.

View Thread (5)

RE: Not much new here!

Tue, 20 May 2008 10:42:02 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-20-08 10:42am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To mr smut (0):

Agree - and at that price: $38.80 - it's rip-off...and even the $19.95 via Rabbit is too much.

View Thread (5)

RE: Not much new here!

Tue, 20 May 2008 10:11:32 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-20-08 10:11am

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (0)

To Denner (0):

It's exactly the same situation that I was facing while being a member. Only a few updates in several months. Not exactly what they are promising to the public :-(

Thanks for this information!

Cheers,
Smut

View Thread (5)

RE: What's new?

Mon, 19 May 2008 02:35:33 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-19-08 02:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To exotics4me (0):

Thanks - jolly good tip, exotics4me
I'll let you know about things - if I join.

View Thread (3)

RE: What's new?

Sun, 18 May 2008 18:21:32 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-18-08 06:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey Denner, For one thing the price has gone up to $38 a month, but if you go over to Rabbit's Reviews, you can get a special price of $19.90 per month, if you do that just make sure it says, "discounted price" on the Super Glam join page, I was just checking it out and it kept showing $1.29 per day for 30 days, which is $38. I finally went to rabbits reviews with the Opera browser and the special price was available $19.90 for a month. I may re-join it, haven't been there in awhile and I have seen that they have a full fishnet bodysuit set of Aneta Keys.

View Thread (3)

RE: What's new?

Sun, 18 May 2008 12:26:42 PDT

Super Glam (0)

05-18-08 12:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by mr smut (0)

To Denner (0):

I'd like to know too. I was a member for more than six months about 1 1/2 years ago. I simply forgot to cancel my subscription because I was so busy at that time. After accidentally having found out that I was still paying I got extremely pissed because of their way of releasing photo shoots. Still I had shoots not being fully available!

Ever since I cancelled my subscription I get lots of mails saying that they give away memberships for free to the first 100 that subscribe ... I'm not stupid enough to give it a try I guess ;o)

View Thread (3)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:45:59 PDT

Super Glam (0)

04-28-08 01:45pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (0)

To Drooler (0):

Lol...sorry, but I was looking into this when I saw your very negative feelings about this site.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Mon, 28 Apr 2008 03:05:24 PDT

Super Glam (0)

04-28-08 03:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To jd1961 (0):

You mean that all this time you've been communicating with someone who hasn't even been here? ;)

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 23:52:08 PDT

Super Glam (0)

04-27-08 11:52pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (0)

To Drooler (0):

You've got 2 months to go !!

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Tue, 27 Nov 2007 03:00:10 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-27-07 03:00am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To Drooler (0):

Close - Rip Off Bitch - dancers who have no interest in providing any entertainment whatsoever to the guys - they just want as much money as they can get. The opposite are high-satisfaction dancers - they're working, too, but they want the guys that spend money on them to be happy they did so.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Sun, 25 Nov 2007 08:16:41 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-25-07 08:16am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Great news, Drooler.
I somewhat missed a fellow player and opponent (are that the right english words)in this game.......
It was getting a little boring without the Drooler-touch.
It's always more fun to have qualified response.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:54:52 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-25-07 04:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Thanks, Denner. I'm getting back into PU more now. On the "local" front, finding never-opened zips and of course more girls with multiple aliases.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:51:13 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-20-07 11:51am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Hey Drooler

Above all: Welcome back - hope you stay.
It's not been quite the same without you.

But your right: signup - and there're still ripoffs now and then - no matter how good you get checking things out....

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:06:57 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-19-07 02:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To PinkPanther (0):

About TheBestPorn, it was their positive subsequent reviews that got me back to SuperGlam and my utter disappointment, which lead me to ask myself what to do. It was one misrepresentation and ripoff too many for me. Believe me, I've had my share. So I said, "NO MORE!"

Agreed that the fun is finding and enjoying the great ones, but that as far as my own tastes are concerned is what I've already done. I've looked and looked and there are no more at this time. So I'm waiting a good long while and looking forward to lots of content buildup once my waiting period is over.

Like, July 1st, 2008, the clock strikes midnight ... click "submit!"

BTW, what's an ROB dancer? "Rude Old Bitch?" I can't figure that one out.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:53:37 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-19-07 01:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To Denner (0):

Hey Denner,
I have dropped in and thought I ought to at least answer some of the replies. The SuperGlam experience was the final straw for me. Just got fed up with the bs. Totally.

No signups = no ripoffs.

So I've been going through my already enormous collection and finding that, oh, Anita is also called Paulina, etc. etc. I've turned into a freakin' porn librarian (LOL).

I wouldn't necessarily recommend anyone else taking a long break like I'm doing, but it works for me. It does mean putting off the fun of "new porn," but next time, I'll be getting gobs for less, and only from the trusted and true.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:32:51 PST

Super Glam (0)

11-19-07 01:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To asmith12 (0):

I understand where you're coming from, and that's where I used to be, but I'm still at a "burnout" point. I've been through LOTS of sites. And the SuperGlam experience, being one of several recent ripoffs, just broke the proverbial camel's back.

And actually, I'm looking forward to a nice buildup of content on my favorite sites after my being away for a good, good long while.

Anyway, I dropped in to keep my membership at PU alive (don't know the actual terms on login frequency to do that but whatever). Thought I ought to at least answer my "mail."

Thanks again.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:57:21 PDT

Super Glam (0)

10-18-07 06:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (0)

To asmith12 (0):

To me giving up on porn sites because there are some rip-off sites around - if that weren't the case, why would The Best Porn.com and this site be so helpful - is like giving up on going to strip clubs because there are some ROB dancers. The fun is finding and enjoying the great ones.

Enjoy your break, Drooler - it's good to take a break when you're just plain fed up.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:48:46 PDT

Super Glam (0)

10-18-07 01:48am

COMMENT REPLY by asmith12 (0)

To Drooler (0):

> From signing up for ANY more sites for the next 9 months.
IMHO one site (regardless how poor it is) is NOT worth giving up completely for such a long time (after all, there are tons of decent sites out there). Just my humble opinion though.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 17:10:31 PDT

Super Glam (0)

10-17-07 05:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (0)

To Drooler (0):

Excellent heads up! I'll make sure to avoid at all cost.

View Thread (14)

RE: Gone ... well, not fishin'!

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 13:53:10 PDT

Super Glam (0)

10-17-07 01:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (0)

To Drooler (0):

Drooler is pissed..........man, I sure understand his reaction.

These "Glam-folks" been carpet-bombing me the last 3-4 months with offers and telling how fine this "new" site is and how much new good stuff there is...

Not that I'm wiser than Drooler on this matter - I was just busy at the moment with quite a few other sites to get tempted.
Drooler payed for the crap - and with that gave this good warning to the rest of us.

I'm also fed up with too many smart-ass sites and wasting my money...BUT I'd sure hate to miss Droolers company at this place for 9 month.

View Thread (14)

RE: TBP Follow-up review

Sat, 22 Sep 2007 03:42:59 PDT

Super Glam (0)

09-22-07 03:42am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (0)

To jd1961 (0):

Great analogy, jd1961! Mind you, I have read at PU that TBP reviewers have to transact with credit cards for access to the sites they review, though I'm in the dark about who ultimately foots the bill.

And that might be the crux of matter. Looking at the time sequence of reviews by TBP and PU reviewers/ commenters/ repliers, you see things like TBP saying in Feb. this year that SuperGlam offers 4000px pix, then a PU reviewer saying later that the links labeled 4000px lead to pics that are considerably smaller -- finding no pics at that size. Conclusion? Obviously, TBP is just taking what they're shown at face value -- something that isn't true! -- and then telling us later that it is! Pardon my language, but that's what the word "flaky" is meant to describe.

And they say that more models have been added? OK, but is that a Porsche and a Ferrari, or a Focus and an Edsel? Names, please. Just seven (new ones) isn't going the break the keyboard.

Anyway, Joe Lunchbreak/PU member certainly seems to have more at stake when the "process transaction" button gets that mouse click.

As the saying goes, "Money talks, and bullshit walks."

View Thread (2)

RE: TBP Follow-up review

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 04:00:49 PDT

Super Glam (0)

09-21-07 04:00am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (0)

To Drooler (0):

Well, if you go to a football game, buy a couple of tickets, and your team stinks up the field, you're not going home happy. But if you're in the pressbox with complimentary field passes and cocktails, you might have a different attitude Lol

View Thread (2)