PU - In Focus Girls - All Activity

In Focus Girls Comment

Tue, 06 Dec 2011 09:01:34 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-06-11 09:01am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Another lack of preview

Talking about PREVIEWS like the former input of Wicked Pictures (thumbs up, exotics)....I really miss the same (previews of better standard) in the two best sites from the company: Final Whistle Ltd. which is:

Only Cuties
In Focus Girls

I do not get it. Those two sites are just great - both softcore/solo teens and HC/bg... but the preview is even less than hopeless - at least for a some kind of major site/sites and compared to similar..

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: impression from their preview clips

Mon, 01 Aug 2011 19:07:46 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

08-01-11 07:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Ergo Proxy (13):

It's not a reality site, if that's what you mean. I would say that it's pretty performancey, though I personally don't consider that to be a bad thing. My main gripe with this site is that they have gone the shitty-photo-treatment route over time. So where you used to have skin tone and all the things that are exciting about looking at hot nekkid women, now the photos are all laquered crap where you might as well be looking at one of those sites with 3-d cartoon images. The vids are still good, in my opinion, and older photos are better than the new ones.

View Thread (1)

In Focus Girls Comment

Sat, 30 Jul 2011 02:40:40 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

07-30-11 02:40am

COMMENT by Ergo Proxy (13)

impression from their preview clips

Judging from their preview clips the girls are already at the edge of orgasm before touching their pussies. Is the majority of the content more "believable" or do they stick to the concept "start moaning from beginning to end"? This was the reason for cancelling my Sapphic Erotica membership a long time ago.

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Wrong Special Price?

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 06:03:44 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

09-01-10 06:03am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To lk2fireone (116):

When a user points out an error in our listing I try to catch it and forward it to a TBP Editor. If they can confirm it, they correct the listing. That's what happened here.

Sites rarely notify us when prices are changed. We have people out spot checking but still, we appreciate it when a user let's us know of errors.

View Thread (4)

RE: Wrong Special Price?

Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:53:48 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

09-01-10 01:53am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

Thanks for friendly response. I was just confused by your comment, and didn't understand your meaning. I am a little slow at times. :-)

View Thread (4)

RE: Wrong Special Price?

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:02:27 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

08-31-10 10:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by slutty (92)

To lk2fireone (116):

Sorry, price listed at PU when I looked said 29.95, you are right, it is correct now. I will try to be more clear with my comments next time!

View Thread (4)

RE: Wrong Special Price?

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:09:45 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

08-31-10 07:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To slutty (92):

$19.95/month is the price listed at PU. Not really sure what you are trying to say. If you do not use the PU link, the "regular" price is $29.95/month.

Edit01: Perhaps the price listed at PU was different from $19.95/month when you made your comment. Is that why you made your comment? Your comment is so short, it's hard to figure out what you were trying to say, or mean. :)

View Thread (4)

In Focus Girls Comment

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 00:40:40 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

08-31-10 12:40am

COMMENT by slutty (92)

Wrong Special Price?

I get 19.95 as a special price option when I go to the join page.

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Helvetic's Review

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:03:23 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

02-17-10 01:03am

REVIEW REPLY by Helvetic (8)

To lk2fireone (116):

Just my hopes to still be able at 99...

View Thread (3)

RE: Helvetic's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:52:00 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

02-16-10 10:52am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Helvetic (8):

Nice first review, with good details. On your profile page it states you are 99 years old. Is that a joke or mistake?

View Thread (3)

RE: Helvetic's Review

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:43:44 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

02-16-10 09:43am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To Helvetic (8):

Dollars for Euros?!!!!

That is Regional Pricing & in all honesty should NOT be condoned! :0E

That apart, a decent debut review. ;0)
Welcome to PU!

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (3)

RE: anyonebutme's Review

Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:05:00 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

02-05-10 10:05pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To anyonebutme (14):

I wish they would lay off the freaking photoshopping, which you correctly list as a major con - I keep being drawn back to this site - but the photoshopping makes their posted sets boring - so my former excitement about this site is no more. Nice vids, but without photosets that are also enjoyable it's a site that's killed 50% of its updates, far as I'm concerned.

View Thread (1)

RE: Softcore / Hardcore?

Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:44:50 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

01-15-10 02:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To anyonebutme (14):

Thanks for the info, folks. :0)

Looks like it is not for me then.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (4)

RE: Softcore / Hardcore?

Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:27:09 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

01-13-10 03:27am

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To Capn (27):

The site is all solo masturbation vids. Nothing extreme, usually fingering, occasional toy. No talking. There are some fisting and pissing videos, but these are few and far between. None-the-less, is one of the best solo mast sites on the net.

Their videos are better than the imagesets, which suffer from photoshop softening.

View Thread (4)

RE: propaGhandi's Review

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:06:25 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-12-09 04:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by propaGhandi (5)

To Denner (227):

... has been done ;) thank you - Cheers

View Thread (4)

RE: propaGhandi's Review

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 06:32:32 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-12-09 06:32am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To propaGhandi (5):

Oh, BTW - remember those who gives you trust - and if you feel visa/versa - I'M NOT a great need - but take a look at the Thread by RagingBuddhist....'Trust ratings reminder'

View Thread (4)

RE: propaGhandi's Review

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:55:10 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-11-09 10:55am

REVIEW REPLY by propaGhandi (5)

To Denner (227):

thx Denner ... indeed.

View Thread (4)

RE: propaGhandi's Review

Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:34:37 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-11-09 06:34am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To propaGhandi (5):

Nice and short review of In Focus Girls - and I agree with the score - much closer to reality than the 91 - that's still at TBP.
Can also agree on:
- can turn into a daily routine
Pretty accurate - not much is going on here and certainly not much in new ways - the same old, the same old.....

View Thread (4)

RE: Softcore / Hardcore?

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:33:01 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-10-09 05:33pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Drooler (218):

And very little of that in the last year

View Thread (4)

RE: Softcore / Hardcore?

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:00:22 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-10-09 03:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Capn (27):

OnlyCuties has hardcore. InFocusGirls doesn't except for lesbian.

View Thread (4)

In Focus Girls Comment

Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:18:42 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-10-09 11:18am

COMMENT by Capn (27)

Softcore / Hardcore?

Having had a look at what passes for a 'tour' here, I was unclear on this.

I get the impression that there is a fair amount of hardcore? Roughly what percentages are we talking?

I primarily like softcore full strips in photosets, so is this site really worth a shot for me, please?

Thanks for your input. :0)

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Question for members

Mon, 07 Dec 2009 06:45:07 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-07-09 06:45am

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To MargulisAZ (84):

I'm not a member at this point. I got sick of the increasing photo-shopping, though I like their concept and their babes. But fisting - very rare. There might have been 1 fisting scene added in the last year - their usual fare currently is a hot babe showing off her bod, stripping and masturbating, most often outdoors with all natural sounds.

View Thread (1)

In Focus Girls Comment

Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:25:26 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-06-09 11:25pm

COMMENT by MargulisAZ (84)

Question for members

I haven't been a member of this site for about a year. I'm wondering if any current members could tell me if they've started adding more fisting scenes over the last year. They pretty much stopped as of the last time I was a member, even though they initially had a lot of those sort of scenes.

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: I can't believe the official rating...

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:55:19 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

11-23-09 07:55pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To williamj (9):

Yeah - agreed - I got bored when they started having too much photo-shopping in the pics, but it's a really good site - very consistent with hot women posing, stripping and masturbating - sounds good to me!

View Thread (3)

RE: I can't believe the official rating...

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:46:49 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

11-23-09 07:46pm

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (9)

To crackman (0):

It�s a good site for the porn xxx content that it advertises. Teen Cunny. Been a memember twice and it�s a teen site for the fetish for sure. Teen girls. Lots of newbie teens posing and spreading for the site. If you into newbie teen erotica I can�t think of a better site. I think one of the best site for Ero Solo Teens.

The teens are not into acting, no fake O but you get to see barely legal teen twat and thats worth it.

View Thread (3)

RE: I can't believe the official rating...

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:08:53 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

11-23-09 10:08am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To crackman (0):

If you're a current or recent member there, why not add your own review to the mix? I was at this site before we had this forum, and your comment seems to indicate that nothing's changed since I was there. I didn't think enough of it to rejoin so I could review it.

View Thread (3)

In Focus Girls Comment

Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:53:59 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

11-23-09 07:53am

COMMENT by crackman (0)

I can't believe the official rating...

of 91 from thebestporn. How can a site offering clips where the model is pretending to masturbate, and faking an orgasm, rate so highly?

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Concerns, Anyone else having this issue ?

Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:29:19 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

09-23-09 02:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by dracken (213)

To Cybertoad (77):

I know I'm paranoid about this but maybe your password got hacked that would result in way to many downloads (happened to me once ever since I change my pass very often)

Just throwing my 2 cents in. Change passwords frequently!

View Thread (3)

RE: GCode's Review

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:25:30 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-20-09 12:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To exotics4me (431):

That's what I'm talking about exactly though, most sites could easily take the other 4 of the 5 (or at least one more) outfits they bring/provide and shoot them for seperate shoots and still remain exclusive. Then, there will not be the same basic scene played on photo and on the videos for every single update. I mean, I understand that after so many shoots, you can only have so many 'looks' until they get repetitive but it really adds to a site. And even on this site plus many others, I'm just looking for like 1 or 2 different sets that are different in appearance to their already shot video content. As I am going to the sites I'm on now and my old photo content, I am noticing that less are the 'real' screen caps I was describing earlier that I thought they were but I have to really pay close attention to detail to tell otherwise (plus the fact of no direction and so on on the video). Twisty's is on my next site to join because I noticed they have so many sets and videos, this is great news. As for your response about looking for sites that are not all exclusive have photos, this is why I think most sites are suffering because they can easily provide decent updates of photos in different locations and outfits. But I do see your point, I suppose it's just easier to go to like teen dreams and just get a butt load of non exclusive photos if you want em. Thanks for the responses and tips, I've definitely been swayed in to twisty's next from your input :)

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:15:48 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-19-09 09:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To GCode (99):

Gcode,

What you are seeing is most likely because the sites with photo shoots and videos in the same setting and clothes are exclusive to their site. I'm not positive on how sites go about booking these models, if it is an per hour basis or per shoot basis. I know that the site ATK Premium has a lot of behind of the scenes videos that are actually pretty good about explaining how they do their shoots. The model could have say 5 outfits there, usually brought from their own closets/homes and they in turn will shoot 5 different sets, one for each outfit. I've seen Eve Angel complain several times that her members on her old site were wanting new outfits in every set. A problem for her since she had over 250 sets on that site. She was really joking about it more than anything, even saying she had started making her own clothes and jewelry since the stores didn't have anything different than what she already had.

I might be able to help in one way and that is to say don't necessarily look for sites that have 100% exclusive content. This will get you more photo sets that are in different outfits than the videos. Take a look sometime at Eve Angel's old site. Every outfit and setting had a photo set and video set. Where as on say Twistys, I don't think any of her videos have the same outfits as her picture sets on there. And they have 53 picture sets and 10 videos of her, but none are the same outfit/setting.

There is a downfall to exclusive content and it goes into cost for the site more than anything. I think the reason that Panther and I responded to the exclusive part is because we are probably using the word differently than you are. Generally speaking when you see exclusive in porn it means that the content cannot be seen on any other site. If you are still interested in Twistys, based on wanting different outfits from set to set, it could be your best bet of all sites.

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 13:59:54 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-19-09 01:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To exotics4me (431):

Yeah I suppose I never really looked in to the picture's too much because the outfits and locations were the same, plus the content. However, these pictures are good for some I suppose but I still see them as basically screen caps of the video even though they weren't shot at the same time. I suppose I just like seperate photo sets with different locations and outfits that are not basically on video already. Plus, I tend to see this trend on most sites more and more and it's quite annoying to me :( It is what it is though, I know I don't like it so I'll keep seeing this as a con, but I do know that maybe some might not watch vids much and then I suppose these pic sets must be fine. However, as a lover of both, I usually start by looking at photo sets then videos, and it almost seems like a spoiler for the video to come (at least to me). So when these sets are usually like this, I don't even look at them because I want the video to be somewhat of a surprise. I'm probably in the minority in thinking about it this way, because of so many sites doing it like this, but that does not mean I can't mention it, ya know? (maybe it will help others who think like me, I guess). Thanks for the input on the review about the names being different and how to tell the actual difference between a still and a seperate shoot.

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:51:45 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-17-09 11:51pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To GCode (99):

Nice review GCode, just don't get those model names too embedded in your brain. This site along with its sister sites, Sapphic Erotica and Only Cuties has a very odd, different naming system than nearly all other sites. Not for sure if anyone had mentioned it, but you can usually go to euro babe index and put the name in that you know them by and they will list all of her aliases.

On the discussion of stills or photos. There are a couple of ways to tell the difference. I know this from being a member at Give Me Pink off and on for a couple of years now. They offer stills, photos and video for each set.

Here is how you can tell if it is a still or picture. Look late in the sets for the masturbation ones. If those were stills you could see a slight motion blur around the girl's hand/toy/fingers. A good site to see how this works is ALS Scan. They have the Photoshoot videos, where a videographer films while the photographer takes pictures.

These border on major boredom, though the girl will have a dildo in her, she will be sitting there, talking and laughing. Then the photographer says, "Ready" she closes her eyes and opens her mouth like she is moaning. I think this is a pretty normal practice for Euro models, same setting/outfit for pictures and videos.

Just look for the motion blur. Hope that was clear. You have a whole world of Euro models out there now!

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:09:50 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-17-09 09:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To PinkPanther (44):

You could be right, I'm not a professional photographer or director so I have no clue. I'll change my wording in this review to make it more clearer to others. Thanks for the feedback.

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:06:13 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-17-09 09:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To GCode (99):

Given that their vids have natural sound and don't have the sound of clicking cameras or directors, I think that "yes, they do the vid and photo shoot separately - same location & outfits - I'm sure they have dupes when there's messiness involved." If there's anyone here that knows more the methodology of doing these kind of photo/vid shoots, they ought to chime in.

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:30:06 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-17-09 08:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (99)

To PinkPanther (44):

From what I can gather is these shoots are the same clothes and scenes from the movies that get updated later as videos. They are shoots and are good quality but they were shot during the video shoot for sure. The locations are the same as the video as well as the content. Therefore, the update that happens first is the photo shoot of the movie scene to come. For example, the scene shows the model pouring orange juice on herself and she does this in the same location and at the same time during the video. Therefore, these shoots are happening at the same time. Hope that clears things up as to what I mean. What I mean by exclusive photo sets, are outfits and locations that are available outside of an accompanying video as well. Most sites do this now as their only photo shoots but I also like content that is available seperatly and can also not be seen in the video already. Plus, do you really think they would shoot two seperate shoots of the model in the same outfit and location? Meaning that, these 2 shoots happened at a seperate time?

View Thread (8)

RE: GCode's Review

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:52:37 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-17-09 05:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To GCode (99):

Screen stills? You think so? I don't. I think that they are photo sets that go along with, but are separate from the vids. They don't give the appearance of screen stills to me.

I would compare them to the photosets that you see at Pix & Video or One By Day - both of those sites have vids that go along with the photo sets, but the photo sets are not screen stills. For comparison, there are bonus sites to Pix & Video where they do have screen still sets - which look quite different - and much lower quality.

View Thread (8)

RE: Pussy and toys

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:51:02 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-15-09 12:51pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To JENNY (0):

I know, I know! What was I thinking?

View Thread (6)

RE: Pussy and toys

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:28:54 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

04-15-09 11:28am

COMMENT REPLY by JENNY (0)

To Drooler (218):

I LIKE PUSSY AND TOYS.IF YOU DONT HAVE THAT WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO HAVE?

View Thread (6)

RE: cwpuk's Review

Tue, 30 Dec 2008 01:52:11 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-30-08 01:52am

REVIEW REPLY by cwpuk (8)

To badandy400 (103):

I can't remember really if there was a limit. But there is a limit of approximately 8 to 10 connections on Sapphic Erotica which I believe is from the same company. It's not a major problem, I just tell my download manager to download a few at a time.

View Thread (4)

RE: Concerns, Anyone else having this issue ?

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:01:33 PST

In Focus Girls (1)

12-02-08 03:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Cybertoad (77):

Agree with williamj - though the motherload-sites of the company Final Whistle Ltd - Only Cuties, Sapphic Erotica and In Focus Girls are topscores at TBP it could be time for new reviews - at TBP.
These sites are - just as williamj and cybertoad indicates going downhill.
The content is slacking, the memberservice is poor, the downloadspeed/use of DL manager a problem and so on. Remember just half a year ago or so things were much better - I like the price of $19.95 and not $ 29.95, but it's not enough anymore...

View Thread (3)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Sat, 01 Nov 2008 00:16:05 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

11-01-08 12:16am

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To PinkPanther (44):

LOL, Dude ummm mellow , just making and observation thats what we are here for right?
And since he edited it umm guess I made a very valid point LOL

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:43:03 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-31-08 12:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To Cybertoad (77):

He said it only updated 3 or 4 times a week, which wasn't often enough for his tastes. The every day updates might not be often enough for his tastes either - some sites give multiple updates a day, but I was responding to the incorrect info in the review - I should note that the review has now been edited - so if anybody else comes along and says, "Where does he say it only updates 3 or 4 times a week?", well it no longer does.

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:06:42 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-31-08 12:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by xbigvmanx (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (44):

Yeah your right. But I always felt the updates was like getting a drop of water in a bucket per day. So I will re-edit my review. Thanks for the heads up.

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:04:04 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-31-08 12:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To PinkPanther (44):

Hmmm
I dont see where he said it doesn't update daily or often?

I agree though yep it sure does update daily nice site good download speed. Awsome customer service ( my experiance)

View Thread (5)

RE: xbigvmanx's Review

Fri, 31 Oct 2008 11:18:08 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-31-08 11:18am

REVIEW REPLY by PinkPanther (44)

To xbigvmanx (Webmaster):

Actually, this site updates every single day - one day it updates with pics, the next day it updates with the related vid.

View Thread (5)

RE: Concerns, Anyone else having this issue ?

Fri, 24 Oct 2008 08:26:17 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-24-08 08:26am

COMMENT REPLY by williamj (9)

To Cybertoad (77):

Final Whistle has really slipped. I now recommend avoiding their sites if you where a member when they where good. Too many negative things from trust reviewers. Its a shame they had it going when they where good.

View Thread (3)

RE: Good site but with some cons

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:20:39 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-21-08 10:20am

COMMENT REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To mr smut (40):

Site still deathly slow, and downloads are cutting out.

View Thread (3)

In Focus Girls Comment

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:17:47 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

10-21-08 10:17am

COMMENT by Cybertoad (77)

Concerns, Anyone else having this issue ?

Anyone else having this issue ?
In a week I can only 1 download one video at a time and their support says that they limit the conections however I can not even surf their site at the same time and download. They seem ok with this so wondered what everyone else was expiencing there?
Forget trying a DL manager it locks me out. Anyone else?

Edit, this seems to be a new site practice upon surfing many others complain about this. Content good but this is a huge pain.

Visit In Focus Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: PinkPanther's Review

Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:10:32 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

09-06-08 09:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To PinkPanther (44):

Excellent review. Pros and cons and, especially the way you explain how you judge a site.

You made me think through each of my current sites and I quickly identified two that I don't have an eagerness to see the current updates.

Better yet, your interests match mine. I am very happy exploring a gorgeous babe's body as she does things with it that I want to see...which is not just some dude with a hairy butt pounding her with a mechanical in and out while she makes funny noises. In Focus Girls has been on my "futures" list but your review and the PU discount have me about ready to drop those other sites and sign up for this one.

View Thread (2)

RE: PinkPanther's Review

Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:36:14 PDT

In Focus Girls (1)

09-06-08 11:36am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To PinkPanther (44):

Site's content seems interesting.

View Thread (2)