PU - Teen Sex Movs - New Reviews

Teen Sex Movs Review

Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:54:34 PST

Teen Sex Movs (2)

11-18-11 10:54am

REVIEW = 88 by careylowell (17)

Pros:
-Just one Andrew Jackson a month with PU discount
-Few of the tattoos & fake tits now obligatory of mainstream US porn starlets.
-Young women banged by young men, not men old enough to pass as their dads.
-Site nav is simple, clean.
-A host of fresh faces.
-I don't recall any music. Hallelujah!

Cons:
-Locations are stiflingly provincial, filmed at various somnolent hamlets in Eastern Europe. Adrift in a perpetual economic gloaming, the lads and lasses drinking bathtub liquor from their best, least chipped glasses. All but three or four women appear in jeans & sneakers.
-Many scenes are shot without much technical finesse. Dialing the camera's ISO to 1600 won't compensate for the lack of proper lighting.

Bottom Line:
My sole reason for membership was to see sexual hanky-panky between young people of similar ages. Here, TeenSexMovs succeeds with roughly two-thirds of the action. Am I the only voyeur officially freaked out by mainstream porn's zillion scenes of 20 yr old girls pounded by 45 yr old men?
Does the PU membership know of similar sites? Write in as immortality awaits!
The apparent lack of anyone else in the room besides the performers and the cameraman lends an air of spontaneity.
Rawness of production values wears after 20 or 30 scenes. They don't own a tripod or more than one lens. Blankets are nailed to walls for backdrops. My guess: the closest the cameramen came to formal training was the day they drove past the front door to the Prague Institute of Cinematography. They didn't stop.

Visit Teen Sex Movs - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Sex Movs Review

Tue, 10 May 2011 10:20:23 PDT

Teen Sex Movs (2)

05-10-11 10:20am

REVIEW = 92 by lk2fireone (116)

Pros:
-Discounted price of $19.95/month thru PU/TBP.
-No download limits.
-No DRM.
-Good download speeds (My max download speed is 620-630 KB/s, and I regularly get that speed downloading files from this site without a download manager).
-Can use a download manager. I can use DownThemAll here.
-Large selection of attractive white Eastern European teens. Mainly slender girls with small breasts, but some models with medium breasts.
-Little to no tattoos or piercings on the models.
-Most of the recent videos are professionally shot: ok to good lighting, camera-work, focus, colors of skintones, foreground and background.
-Choice of 3 download options for videos: high, medium, low quality WMV files.
-Streaming option.
-Photosets (which are a photo capture of a video shoot) have a single zip option.
-Content is dated.
-There is a model list with a nice-sized thumbnail for each female, that has a link to the model's videos and photosets.

Cons:
-Cons are mostly minor.
-No storyline or plot. A boy and girl fuck. Maybe say a few words before fucking, but no buildup or tease or stripping before the sex.
-Little variation in scenery: fucking takes place in bedroom, bathroom, or some other room indoors.
-No costumes to add color to scene (models wear drab street clothes which come off within a minute or two for fucking.
-Older videos are not as good as the more recent ones shot the last few years. Older videos usually don't have the good camera-work, higher
definition, etc. But there is a ton of newer material that is very good quality at this site and at the bonus sites.
-No model bios.
-Search is basic. Can search by model name, which shows her material at the network.
-Default filename for downloaded video or photoset is a useless number: for example, 315.sethigh.wmv and 315.setall.zip for the most recent video and accompanying photoset posted.

Bottom Line:
Number of videos: 560.
Number of photosets: 560.

High quality video (for newer content):
Width x height 1280x720.
Total bitrate: 4224 kbps
Video runtime: 20-30+ minutes.

The older content from several years ago is much lower in quality.

Photo:
Size: 120-160 KB.
Width x height: 960-1440 pixels.
Resolution: horizontal x vertical: 300 x 300 dpi.

Number of photos per photoset: 150-200
The individual photos at this set are better quality than the average photo at the network. I think they hired a photographer who knew what he
was doing, for a change. These are basically good quality photos: in focus, framing and skin tone. The photos are not the artistic or top quality you get at Met-art or MPL Studios, but they are much better than the often blurry, screen-cap photos found at some of the bonus sites.

Updates: Irregular update rate for this single site. One new video about every 3-7 days.
Most of the bonus sites do not update. But with the ones that do, you get a large number of updates to keep you watching for new material.

This site is part of the Teen Mega World network (Royal Cash).
This is a basic, bread-and-butter teen fuck site. This is fuck-suck-lick-bj-fuck-some-more. If you want romance or tease or eroticism go look elsewhere.

The models are real teens. Many of them are really physically attractive.
Little variety of teens: they are slender white Eastern European girls, most with small breasts, but a good number with medium breasts.

The sex action includes cunninlingus, BJ, vaginal and anal fucking. Not much tenderness to the sex, but a ton of fuck-suck-fuck-some-more, with BJ. After a while, seeing so many of these videos, the action loses a lot of its impact. You'd like some variety to the sex, maybe some buildup or
tease or romance or freshness; but you do get a ton of straight fucking of many attractive young teen girls. There are a limited number of stunt cocks, but that's common: most hardcore sites seem to have a few stunt cocks servicing a large number of different girls.
Membership to any site in the network gives access to a large number of bonus sites in the network. Some sites charge $29.95/month, most sites charge $19.95/month (with the PU/TBP discount). Unless there is a special reason, save $10 and join one of the $19.95/month sites, because most memberships give access to most of the same bonus sites.
Most of the network sites are teen female. There are a few small niche sites: a male gay site, an old-and-young site, latin shemales site, latin
teen site. But the vast bulk of the network content is teen girls (some solo or girl-girl, but most is boy-girl, with some two boys on one girl).
If you are into hardcore slender white Eastern European teens with straight fuck-suck, this site and network will give you plenty to look through for a very low price. For the site and the network access, I am giving this site a high score of 92.

Visit Teen Sex Movs - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Sex Movs Review

Thu, 20 May 2010 11:29:25 PDT

Teen Sex Movs (2)

05-20-10 11:29am

REVIEW = 69 by hugow (3)

Pros:
Cute euro girls doing exactly what the site says: having sex. Not too much anal, gonzo, violence, tastelessness. Fairly frequent updates.

Cons:
Very poor navigation, no search functions, poorly organized with multiple model names. Older recycled content. Very slow download speeds. No slideshow option for photos. Only wmv format for vids.

Bottom Line:
Teensexmovs is now the orphaned sibling of its newer sister sites, teensexmania and now Nubile Girls HD (not to be confused with Nubiles.net, though I'm sure that's the point). The content is basically the same on all three sites and each is accessible as a "bonus site" on the others. But the others have much faster download speeds, though not a hell of a lot else.

This is the second time I've become a member of this site. About a year ago, it seemed much better and fresher to me. Now it seems tired. The slow downloads suggest that it's being abandoned by its owners.

As far as the content goes, the girls are really cute but the sex situations are pretty much all the same: indoors on a bed. It is also really a turn-off when you see really cute girls, and some of the studs, chewing gum while they fuck. I mean really. Can we have some simulation of enjoyment, please?

Right now the best euro teen site for my money might be younglegalporn.net (formerly youngporn.net). Does everything reasonably well, and the girls are MET-art quality -- in fact many of them are MET girls.

Visit Teen Sex Movs - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Sex Movs Review

Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:13:19 PDT

Teen Sex Movs (2)

09-06-08 09:13pm

REVIEW = 70 by Goldfish (63)

Pros:
+ Decent video quality
+ Multiple download options -- movies broken into clips and a few versions of the full movie offered in different levels of quality.
+ Good site navigation
+ Bonus sites
+ Movies/photos can be saved to a favorites page

Cons:
- Some girls so-so on looks
- Scenes not very creative
- Not granted access to some bonus sites
- There is "search by model" but it's not available through the main navigation. I found it at the bottom of a video detail page.
- A lot of banner ads and promotion for other sites. (Some look better than this one!)

Bottom Line:
The day I signed up for teensexmovs.com I was in the mood for a good Euro-teen site. I found a Euro-teen site when I got to the member area but not a good one.

Something is "off" with this site. It may be the girls aren't quite up to that Euro beauty standard or maybe the video production or direction of the actors -- maybe all the above!

I did weed out a few good video downloads for the collection so I won't say it was a total waste.

Visit Teen Sex Movs - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Sex Movs Review

Wed, 30 May 2007 13:14:08 PDT

Teen Sex Movs (2)

05-30-07 01:14pm

REVIEW = 60 by Doug (3)

Pros:
1. Has some cute girls.
2. Gives you access to several other sites free.
3. No download restrictions.
4. Has zip files for photo galleries.

Cons:
1. Cameramen are terrible. Their bad camerawork ruins most of the videos.
2. Clarity/resolution of videos is poor.
3. Sex scenes are usually less than 15 min each.
4. Navigation is awkward.

Bottom Line:
They seriously need to hire a steady-handed cameramen that doesn't shake and move around all the time if they expect this site to make much progress. Aside from the dozen cute girls on this and the companion sites, there's nothing of value here.

Visit Teen Sex Movs - View Replies - Add Reply