<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Elle Sommers - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/ellesommers/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4212</guid>
		<title>Elle Sommers Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4212</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ellesommers/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ellesommers.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Elle Sommers&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ellesommers/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Elle Sommers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-27-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:26pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Amateur Sex AND Non-Nude?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I try not to go off on too many rants, but when I checked out TBP today I noticed this site which was categorized as both Non-Nude and Amateur Sex. I know that Non-Nude is a new category and maybe it was just mis-categorized for a previous review, but how can this be? I've also seen the &quot;Sex&quot; designation placed on sites that I was pretty confident were just modeling sites, so it's happened before. However, in this case it seems a lot more definitive that there wouldn't be sex with no one getting undressed!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Maybe it isn't a big deal, but I have made the assumption in the past that if TBP or PU uses the term &quot;Sex&quot; that means intercourse. We could get into a whole argument over Bill Clinton and saying that BJs and other oral contact isn't sex. However, I don't think that's the issue here. I just wanted to put that out there, but I could just be beating a dead horse. Opinions?
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11247&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Elle Sommers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4212&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4212&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 12:26:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
