<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Pornstar Pay Per View - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornstarpayperview/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_20227</guid>
		<title>Pornstar Pay Per View Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20227</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornstarpayperview/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pornstarpayperview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Pornstar Pay Per View&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pornstarpayperview/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pornstar Pay Per View&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:54am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;asmith12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;124&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Random Site comment&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html&lt;/a&gt; . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're &quot;unethical&quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Results of reviewing non-member area: according to TBP it is a clone of a well-established site, and looks pretty much like expected for such a site. It has everything needed for this kind of site: ability to search clips, purchases of time from $3.95 to $84.95, streaming/rental/download/XXX-to-Burn and so on. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: while I'm not being fan of streaming and DRM, if you're ok with it, can be not too bad (especially considering &quot;XXX to Burn&quot; feature). Chances of being unethical are estimated as &quot;very low&quot;.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11190&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Pornstar Pay Per View&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20227&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20227&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 09:54:34 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
