<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Watch 4 Beauty - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6815</guid>
		<title>Watch 4 Beauty Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6815</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watch4beauty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch 4 Beauty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-07-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:02pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;78&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Hi-Res Photos&lt;br /&gt;
- Zip Files Available&lt;br /&gt;
- Great Models&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Price
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Not Many Videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation Could Be Better&lt;br /&gt;
- Not A Huge Amount Of Material
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I've been getting into these so-called &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; sites lately, mostly for the photos. This is one of the better examples of these sort of sites. The models here are really hot, let's face it--Europe is blowing away the U.S. as far as erotica is concerned at the moment. The girls are just a lot better looking. The problem at this site is that they don't yet have enough models or sets to justify a multi month membership as of yet. I got everything I wanted in my 1 month membership, but what great stuff it is! The photos are hi-res, and great looking. The photography is a lot more erotic than that of similiar sites. Not a lot of &amp;quot;statue posing&amp;quot; here. You can choose up to 5000 pix(!), but as I said, as of this review there are only 85 models. They have HD video also, not a whole lot yet. Personally, I find the &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; vids boring, but that's my prejudice---if that's your cup of tea, you won't be disappointed I guess. You can choose between wmv and quicktime. But back to the photos, I love them! They're in the magazine style, with titles like &amp;quot;Provoking Cock&amp;quot;! The navigation---while the member's area is very attractive, the navigation is a bit irritating. You click the model, go to her page. You click her picture, get the sets. You click a set, and then you have to click the cover, and then you're finally there! And they don't include the cover in the set, you have to save the hi-res cover and place it in yourself. Site is updated frequently. it will be better in a year.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11143&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6815&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6815&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:02:19 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>