<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Watch 4 Beauty - New Comments</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18858</guid>
		<title>Watch 4 Beauty Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18858</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watch4beauty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch 4 Beauty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-11-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3525&quot;&gt;CactusJack&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3525&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;I agree with Drooler&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Big, blurry and granulated pictures are not the reason why I pay to join a site either.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the sets are super soft-core and are not erotic or sexual, but try to be in their themes and titles.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The choppy/bouncy fast-paced video editing is probably the worst thing about the site.  About the only thing I desired after watching them was a Dramamine pill and a motion-sickness bag.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the Hegre-Art site, this one seems to be more focused on travel locations, clothes, props, shadows, etc. rather than on the clear, pure sexual energy/beauty of the model herself.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
About the only good thing I have to say is that they pick the best and hottest models from all the other sites.  But as I said, in the end, they way in which they're shot leaves a lot to be desired, and is more of a let down than a turn on.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11143&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18858&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18858&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:37:26 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5690</guid>
		<title>Watch 4 Beauty Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5690</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watch4beauty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch 4 Beauty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-05-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:26pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;78&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;The Models&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					I joined this site yesterday, and so far I have to say that the models are outstanding! I was pleasantly surprised. Also, the photography is more erotic than some of the other similar sites. I'll do a review when I spend more time there.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11143&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5690&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5690&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:26:30 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2298</guid>
		<title>Watch 4 Beauty Comment</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2298</link>
		<description>
		&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;
			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;

				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watch4beauty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch 4 Beauty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-20-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:48pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;&lt;b&gt;COMMENT&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Watch4Blurriness&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					Have been checking out w4b with their new &amp;quot;5000px&amp;quot; feature -- prominently displayed on their homepage.  Not all of the pics go to this size, but many do, and some older ones top off at various smaller sizes (2400, 2560, 2880, 3600 etc.).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trouble is, some of the pics are REALLY BLURRY.  (Was that a cloud that just passed by my monitor?)  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All in favor of BLURRINESS (head, backside, or TOTALLY as it is sometimes at this site), say &amp;quot;Aye!&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And BTW, not all of the pics are &amp;quot;exclusive,&amp;quot; as some have shown up at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/metart/&quot;&gt;MetArt&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/babelicious/&quot;&gt;Babelicious&lt;/a&gt;, etc -- where they're generally better in quality and size.  cc: theBestPorn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, w4b offers &amp;quot;unlimited downloads,&amp;quot; but it makes you log in over and over!  So add &amp;quot;relentless hassle&amp;quot; to that.  It's just a so-so site, I think.
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11143&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2298&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2298&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:48:32 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>