PU - Watch 4 Beauty - All Activity

RE: I agree with Drooler

Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:44:26 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

04-12-08 02:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To CactusJack (0):

Yes, it isn't as if we first apply eyedrops then immediately look at porn. You might have read the webmaster's reply to my "Watch4Blurriness" comment. Art? Right. How very compelling.

And about the vids, I agree agree agree. Who knows? They might be the antidote to a Ritalin overdose.

I like vids that are paced slowly enough in the right places and that pick it up when it's time, but with continuity of motion and "connection." Such videos are few and far between.

I could care less how "professionally" the video editors work in fades, corner wipes, color shifts, and other such petty tricks every 1.3 seconds.

View Thread (1)

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:37:26 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

04-11-08 12:37pm

COMMENT by CactusJack (0)

I agree with Drooler

Big, blurry and granulated pictures are not the reason why I pay to join a site either.

Most of the sets are super soft-core and are not erotic or sexual, but try to be in their themes and titles.

The choppy/bouncy fast-paced video editing is probably the worst thing about the site. About the only thing I desired after watching them was a Dramamine pill and a motion-sickness bag.

Like the Hegre-Art site, this one seems to be more focused on travel locations, clothes, props, shadows, etc. rather than on the clear, pure sexual energy/beauty of the model herself.

About the only good thing I have to say is that they pick the best and hottest models from all the other sites. But as I said, in the end, they way in which they're shot leaves a lot to be desired, and is more of a let down than a turn on.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 13:38:02 PST

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

01-10-08 01:38pm

COMMENT REPLY by Marc01 (Webmaster)

To PinkPanther (30):

Good to know as well is that Monika Vesela (http://www.monikasdreams.com/), not reviewed over here if i'm right, has been added to the EroticDreams4you.com as well. Don't forget you get access to all 4 sites (for free) when you signup to Watch4beauty .

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Sat, 25 Aug 2007 05:33:52 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

08-25-07 05:33am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To PinkPanther (30):

Thanks for the heads up! I'd been through Nikky's site and am not so sure if it has had any further updates. "Ambra" is a gift from heaven! Verunka is a rare, mysterious, warm/cool type.

Maybe you'll do a review of this package? I'd really appreciate it if, assuming you do, you'll say how many galleries and videos are in each of the sites. I know it means "taking inventory," but I'm sure many PornUsers will definitely appreciate the effort.

Thanks again, PinkPanther! (Mancini music playing in the background ...)

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Fri, 24 Aug 2007 19:00:17 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

08-24-07 07:00pm

COMMENT REPLY by PinkPanther (30)

To Drooler (156):

FTI - the people that run Watch4Beauty.com just started a new site - eroticdreams4you.com - it is basically a package deal of 3 of their sologirl sites, nikkysdreams.com, verunkasdreams.com & ambrasdreams.com

It was too good a deal to pass up after a brief perusal of two of the sites included. These girls are smoking! The photography is awesome! The videos are outstanding!

It's more "erotica" than hard-core porn, but if you like gorgeous women presented well, it's worth a look - makes me think of joining Watch4Beauty again, because the 5000 kb pics and the full-screen vids look outstanding - no blurriness, as I have seen with other sites, including, with some pics, ALS Scan.

View Thread (5)

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:26:30 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

07-05-07 08:26pm

COMMENT by jd1961 (78)

The Models

I joined this site yesterday, and so far I have to say that the models are outstanding! I was pleasantly surprised. Also, the photography is more erotic than some of the other similar sites. I'll do a review when I spend more time there.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Mon, 07 May 2007 03:18:46 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

05-07-07 03:18am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To kutloch (Webmaster):

You say, "We do not say that all of our sets are 5000px." True. Your site says, "Resolution 5000px." Do you expect visitors to interpret that to mean that not all of the sets include 5000px?

You say, "You have to login again only if your session expires." In my experience, the sessions were much shorter than at most sites. How long is a session?

You say, "We are erotic art magazine so some of our sets are artistic. That is why they seems to be blurry. We do not think it is a mistake - it is a different kind of photography. [...] we know this style should be allowed to be art."

OK, fair enough. But understand that some users do not prefer what you do, and they might not even agree with your ideas about art. What I said about W4B is an expression of my likes and dislikes. Others may agree with me, or not, but I think that people who do agree should know.

Finally, I've been a member of W4B several times myself, so you can count me among members who have supported the site. And now I know better what to expect in the future. But I might join again sometime anyway.

View Thread (5)

RE: Watch4Blurriness

Mon, 07 May 2007 03:00:54 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

05-07-07 03:00am

COMMENT REPLY by kutloch (Webmaster)

To Drooler (156):

Let me answer some questions and announce some facts:

- W4B contains exclusive content, only few very old sets were created in cooperation with different company and these sets are also available on MetArt. 99.9% of W4B content is exclusive.

- We offer 5000px resolution photos shortly. All of our previous photo sets were issued again in high resolution. If they were not available, they are only 2560px (max size). We do not say that all of our sets are 5000px.

- Our downloads are not restricted, you have to login members area and than you can download what you like. You have to login again only if your session expires. We are powered with fast servers and connection.

- We are erotic art magazine so some of our sets are artistic. That is why they seems to be blurry. We do not think it is a mistake - it is a different kind of photography. We are cooperating with prefessional photographers and printed magazines so we know that this style should be allowed to be art. We are different and we are proud of it. We have good suppoort in our members.

View Thread (5)

Watch 4 Beauty Comment

Tue, 20 Mar 2007 16:48:32 PDT

Watch 4 Beauty (1)

03-20-07 04:48pm

COMMENT by Drooler (156)

Watch4Blurriness

Have been checking out w4b with their new "5000px" feature -- prominently displayed on their homepage. Not all of the pics go to this size, but many do, and some older ones top off at various smaller sizes (2400, 2560, 2880, 3600 etc.).

The trouble is, some of the pics are REALLY BLURRY. (Was that a cloud that just passed by my monitor?)

All in favor of BLURRINESS (head, backside, or TOTALLY as it is sometimes at this site), say "Aye!"

And BTW, not all of the pics are "exclusive," as some have shown up at MetArt, Babelicious, etc -- where they're generally better in quality and size. cc: theBestPorn.

Finally, w4b offers "unlimited downloads," but it makes you log in over and over! So add "relentless hassle" to that. It's just a so-so site, I think.

Visit Watch 4 Beauty - View Replies - Add Reply