RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:06:35 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 11:06am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

I certainly agree - and I still do not understand the rating at TBP for KScan.

Well, our fellow users can se other rating at PU.

View Thread (2)

RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:43:50 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 09:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

The KScan network or whatever it's called sure knows how to make things look yummy -- to the visitor. Once you see Lucy Stratilova laying on the bed, about to turn belly down for some "peacemaking," the mind starts to replay the credit card info.

I've bought into it 2-3 times myself, but it's always such a downer once you get in. The images are mostly really funky, with poor color control (orangey Sandy and Sophie, pinky Bambi, greyish Orsi, etc.).

And they tell you "we're not professional photographers." For $30?! What a cop out.

There's lots of sites, but it's like rummaging through a line of waste cans just to find something worth it. That was my experience, anyway.

View Thread (2)

PU - Kerotic - All Activity

RE: Poor quality

RE: Poor quality