<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Solo Interviews - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_37728</guid>
		<title>Solo Interviews Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37728</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/solointerviews.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Solo Interviews&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Solo Interviews&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-21-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:52pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;84&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Newer updates have option for full movie download, different movie formats, many screen caps, and different pics sets.&lt;br /&gt;
Download speeds were acceptable (400-500 kbps)&lt;br /&gt;
Most girls were at least decent looking.&lt;br /&gt;
Access to network with 7 other sites.&lt;br /&gt;
Trial is full trial.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					70 updates is all.&lt;br /&gt;
Old content, nothing new since I was a member years ago, regardless of the site saying there are new updates.&lt;br /&gt;
Not all content is exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
Not every update has a full scene download option (some broken up into 10+ parts)&lt;br /&gt;
Some updates have no pics at all.&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of the models are ones you've seen before a hundred times.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I got a special offer to join this site again for free for 3 days since I was a member in the past, and the add said the following &amp;quot;Over 100 new girls since last time you were a member!&amp;quot;.  Guess how many new girls there were.  Zero.  I'm assuming they were referring to the network as a whole with 100 new girls, but the way it came across made it seem it was for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/&quot;&gt;Solointerviews&lt;/a&gt;, which is the only site of the network I really cared about.  I won't bitch too much since it was a free deal, but my review is what it is without any bias, so 65 is all it gets.  Some points.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Even though it claims to have updates and it lists the dates and everything, it must be recycled because none of this crap is new and most, if not all, of these models aren't even in the business anymore they are so outdated.  The older content does seem to have more models that are exclusive to the site, but those updates are also the more annoying ones that do not have full scene downloads or pictures, so you're stuck downloading a bunch of 1 minute file clips.  Annoying.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  One good thing that I can say is that at least you know what a movie is going to be like since even the new updates have 1 minute clip options (with a screen cap for each) and screen cap pictures. I absolutely HATE sites that have 10-20 minute movies with like 1-2 pictures total to see what the movie is going to be like (I'm talking to you Karups, ATK, and many others!).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.  Basically I wouldn't recommend this site for the full membership option, but if you can get in for a trial of some kind it can be worth it since you get access to the other sites in the network, one of which is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/innocenthigh/&quot;&gt;Innocenthigh&lt;/a&gt; which is decent.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11018&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Solo Interviews&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=37728&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=37728&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:52:25 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2179</guid>
		<title>Solo Interviews Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2179</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/solointerviews.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Solo Interviews&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solointerviews/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Solo Interviews&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-13-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:09pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 51&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=221&quot;&gt;DivBZero&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=221&quot;&gt;13&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Navigation is OK, Video quality passable (only the later sets) and presentatable young ladies, well dressed in good settings.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is having a complete and utter giraffe (laugh at our expense) when they say &amp;quot;HIGH QUALITY PICS&amp;quot; on the inside and &amp;quot;Hi-Res Quality Pics&amp;quot; on the tour.  The best I saw clocks in at 700 x 1,050 pixels, and this is only available in the latest sets.  The pictures appear to be taken on an Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XT. which surely must cost less than a models fee.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Videos reported to be 621MB in size, were actually 90MB.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I checked through the family of sites offered in the one months membership - the quality is consistently poor across all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I suggest that one steers away from these sites until they have learnt to present their wares in a manner consistent with their descriptions.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11018&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Solo Interviews&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2179&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2179&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 14:09:00 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
