<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>PU - Oldje - New Reviews</title>
        <description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
        <link>https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/</link>
        <copyright>All Rights Reserved © 2003-2026 PornUsers.com.</copyright>
                    <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_116892</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116892</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-09-25&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:46pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 91&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=25269&quot;&gt;PalmTrees&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=25269&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ My sometimes favorite niche – old and young&lt;br /&gt;
+ Downloads are high quality and available for pictures and videos&lt;br /&gt;
+ The niche sells itself and is one of the most true to niche sites&lt;br /&gt;
+ The site works well and is quick to use&lt;br /&gt;
+ Good choices in female models&lt;br /&gt;
+ Scenes and sex are realistic
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Would like to see some variety between the old and young genders&lt;br /&gt;
- There should be an old and young network to address the inherently repetitive nature of old and young porn-
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My biggest interest in porn is to see something different than I consider “normal sex”. Old and young, transsexuals, BDSM and bisexual are my favorite genres, with old and young, which I consider a niche, being one of my favorites – my favorites change like the seasons. I have to admit, I have not tried a lot of old and young sites. I do not understand why this niche of old and young almost always sticks to the gender roles per site. I have joined sites with the males as the older variable in the old and young equation and with older women with younger women, but I rarely see all these options – including younger men with older women and younger men with older women, blended on old and young sites. I do believe an old and young network would be enough to fix that problem, but it does not affect my score that much. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is one of the best old and younger sites. It is realistic, not that the older men could land that many younger women, but the older men cannot seem to be able to slow themselves with these younger, sexy women. It is likely a sign there is not much editing since I assume a producer could stop filming, cut, take a break and extend a scene. My culture favors the older man and younger woman relationship. It intrigues me towards the niche. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WIth that said, this is not a niche of porn that is going to blow your mind with creativity. It is sex in maybe its most pure form. The men are ecstatic and excited about getting the chance to be with a younger woman. There is not much room for a plot. I do not believe this niche needs a plot and if there was one, it would be an overtly used one like pigtails and lollipops or ankle socks with teddy bears on them. I prefer the perversion that comes from my thinking instead of the imagery. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site does work well and it has fast downloads. You can download the pictures and videos. Practically everything on the site is at least as good as it should be. I always have trouble finding specific models, but it is mostly because I do not know the female models. Oddly enough, most of the older male models have appeared on other older and younger sites. I do not want to sound like I am being critical of the males, but the males are the repetitive part of this niche. They are flattered, excited, aroused and … done. It is why the porn is realistic to me. I do not see most of these men lasting very long with the sexy female models. It is a very good site worth joining a time or two a year.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116892&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=116892&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2025 19:46:15 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_116270</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116270</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-11-24&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:12am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 94&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=24307&quot;&gt;KayTBuffs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=24307&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					There is no pun intended when I say &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; passes the test of time. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Premium quality porn in the old and young niche.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Most have 1080p and the newer scenes have 4K. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three sites are included: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classnudes/&quot;&gt;Class Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class 3some&lt;/a&gt; and Class Blowjobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenes are genuinely fun. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I’m guessing because of the possible limitations the males have, there’s not a lot of directing going on and it makes the content seem more authentic.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My biggest con is I would rather have &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; 3Some as a bonus site than the three Class sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There probably should be more user options, but being a longtime porn user, those aren’t that important to me.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; really does pass the test of time. It’s not easy or that common for any pornsite to do that these days. I can’t count the number of times I’ve throught a site was the best of its class, only to go back and view the content, a few months later and think, “Ok, it’s good, but not as great as I originally thought.” &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; doesn’t have that problem. It is as good as I remember it being. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenes do try and include something of a story, but how much story do these types of scenes need? You have a senior citizen male with at least one cute, pretty, young woman, likely under 30. I think the scene happening is the story or the dream of the older man – and possibly even the naughty dream of the young woman. The only thing that could hurt these scenes would be terrible performances by either male or female, but I haven’t even seen a bad performance from any of the models of either gender. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is doing something right and you can see it in the performance quality. I think the females know and understand the possible limitations the males may have and the female can make that less clear to the viewing audience. A novel idea, let the female control the performance in a porn scene! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site has very high quality videos. It’s not as common in this niche as it is in Lesbian, Hardcore or even Pro Amateur. &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; doesn’t have any of those old scenes that make you say, “The older content is poor quality”. All videos are downloadable and the lowest quality is 720p. Up until a year or so ago, I didn’t download anything over 720p due to space concerns. You also will see a lot of 1080p file downloads of the videos and there are even 4K downloads. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The models attractiveness is going to be subjective. The males are older, often chubby, and wouldn’t fit in a scene on most popular pornsites. The females look similar to what you will find on most Euro sites. Slim to medium build, very young looking and often, very excitable. I’m going to guess they have the dreams or fantasies of being able to turn on an older man enough for him to fully perform and finish sexually. I’m even going to say I believe it’s why these scenes are so good. There’s a chemistry you’re not usually thinking about in porn. I’m sure the older men want to be able to turn on these younger women to be able to feel like they still have it and the females are likely thinking the older male has had quite a few sexy women in their life and want to be the one or one of the ones he remembers most. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only con that I believe is a valid complaint is &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; has a sister site called &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; 3Some, it’s really good though small. The sites that come with an &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; subscription, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classnudes/&quot;&gt;Class Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, Class Blowjobs and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class 3Some&lt;/a&gt;, are good, not great sites and I personally would rather have &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; 3Some, instead, if you want &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; 3Some, you have to join it in a different subscription from &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;. If the two &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; sites were paired together, it would be a near perfect site. As it is, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is still the best young and old niche site I’ve been a member of.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116270&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=116270&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2024 08:12:16 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_116000</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116000</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-20-23&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:05am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=331&quot;&gt;pinkerton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=331&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Exclusive hardcore content from one of the oldest sites featuring 858 scenes of old guys fucking much younger girls.&lt;br /&gt;
+Includes &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classblowjob/&quot;&gt;Class Blowjob&lt;/a&gt; (137 scenes), Class Threesome (80 scenes) and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classnudes/&quot;&gt;Class Nudes&lt;/a&gt; (452 photosets) sites.&lt;br /&gt;
+Good production values and beautiful girls.&lt;br /&gt;
+Regular (mostly weekly) updates to main site.&lt;br /&gt;
+Straightforward functional web site, supports browsing scenes by tags/categories and models.&lt;br /&gt;
+Good search facility by scene name and model name.&lt;br /&gt;
+Model index with stats.&lt;br /&gt;
+Works well on mobile devices.&lt;br /&gt;
+Can stream videos and browse photosets, with options to download (but see cons).&lt;br /&gt;
+Newer content available as 4K video downloads.&lt;br /&gt;
+Reasonable downloaded video file sizes.&lt;br /&gt;
+Good download speeds ans works with a download manager (but see cons).&lt;br /&gt;
+Reliable biller and easy account management/cancellation.&lt;br /&gt;
+Support seems responsive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Expensive with no PU (or any other) discount.&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus sites other than &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classnudes/&quot;&gt;Class Nudes&lt;/a&gt; no longer updating.&lt;br /&gt;
-Username and password automatically generated on sign-up - you can&amp;#039;t choose your own.&lt;br /&gt;
-Disappointing cumshots (see bottom line).&lt;br /&gt;
-No favourites facility, nor comments nor rating system.&lt;br /&gt;
-Increasing number of extensively tatooed girls.&lt;br /&gt;
-No model info in Class-Blowjob, Class-Threesome, no scene name in video listings; Class-Blowjob site has no model or scene name.&lt;br /&gt;
-Unless using a mobile device, there&amp;#039;s no info on when scene was added.&lt;br /&gt;
-Downloading is very tedious - the default filename just says 1080.mp4, 720.mp4 etc, leaving you to type in a meaningful download filename (but see bottom line).&lt;br /&gt;
-Infinite scrolling in Movies page seems pointless.&lt;br /&gt;
-Can&amp;#039;t download Class-Blowjob photos as a single ZIP file.&lt;br /&gt;
-Login requires capcha with no option to remember browser.&lt;br /&gt;
-Login sessions timeouts are annoyingly short.&lt;br /&gt;
-Pricey pre-checked cross-sells at bottom of sign-up page.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is my third time in over a decade that I&amp;#039;ve been a member of &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;, the original old-on-young site that I&amp;#039;m always drawn back to for the latest updates, despite the limited site functionality with no favourites, comments or rating/voting facilities. But hey, it&amp;#039;s the content that counts right?&lt;br /&gt;
With 857 scenes at time of review and dating back to September 2005, the quality is there and even the oldest content is available as 720p HD. I seem to recall the first time I joined &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;, the content was in either WMV or RealMedia format with scenes split across a number of files, so obviously content has been remastered to single MP4 video files, which is very welcome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The main website functionality is basic, providing what&amp;#039;s needed, with content presented as paged scene thumbnails of 5 scenes per page showing the scene name, actors and some of the description of the scene that you&amp;#039;ll see when you click on the scene image to view the scene details page; from there you can watch the streamed video, browse screenshots, the photoset or download the photos and screenshots as ZIP files or the videos as 4K UHD, 1080 HD, 720 HD or 540 SD, all MP4. The streaming video player in the scene detail pages works fine though the nav slider can be slow initially as it streams at the highest quality - choosing a lower resolution stream by clicking on the streamer&amp;#039;s HD logo improves this. Newer scenes feature thumbnail streaming navigation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Model names link to their individual pages which show a larger banner-style photo of them with their scenes listed and some basic info such as country of aliases, origin, height and whether natural boobs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The search works well, matching scene names and model names which are presented in an expanding drop-down list as you type, it even searches scene descriptions! You can also list scenes by tag (anal, DP, doggie-style, etc) so all the options you&amp;#039;d need to locate content of interest are provided. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Models are mostly Euro but includes some hardcore regulars both sides of the pond, getting it on with wrinkled, bald, pot-bellied old guys and seeming to enjoy it, with gentler action than the usual hardcore, after all, old guys are less likely to have as much energy as young porn studs. I&amp;#039;ve discussed the content in my previous (expired) review over 4 years ago, not much has changed but I do notice that quite a few of the latest girls are heavily tatooed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again referring to my previous review, the camerawork is good but I&amp;#039;ll add that generally there&amp;#039;s focus on getting the girl turned and ready for sex, hence there&amp;#039;s more pussy-eating in the content than on other sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The overall production of most of the content is a bit old-fashioned, with many scenes starting with preview screenshots and featuring a soundtrack, which I thought went out of fashion years ago, but maybe it&amp;#039;s just keeping with the site&amp;#039;s theme?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Many of the girls here are well-known Eurobabes, but there are quite a few beauties I&amp;#039;ve never seen or heard of elsewhere and a little research shows that they&amp;#039;ve only ever featured on this site.  The out-takes at the end of some scenes show the good-natured rapport between the girls and the rest of the crew so perhaps that&amp;#039;s an attraction to working for &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;/Class Media rather than say, Woodman or &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/evilangel/&quot;&gt;Evil Angel&lt;/a&gt;?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It&amp;#039;s worth mentioning that a few of the oldies are well-known stunt cocks from the 90s and early 00s, for example, Phillipe Soin, who&amp;#039;s still capable of delivering a sizeable cum load to a girl&amp;#039;s face or mouth.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The sites &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classblowjob/&quot;&gt;ClassBlowjob&lt;/a&gt; and ClassThreesome haven&amp;#039;t updated since my last review, so I refer you so that, but there are better cumshot endings compared with the main site content. ClassNude is 452 photosets of girls in underwear, stripping off, some with a very short video of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For downloading content I recommend using Chrome or Edge with the DownThemAll extension - this will enable you to download with unique filenames which this site doesn&amp;#039;t do by default. In a scene page, just right-click the download link from the Downloads dropdown, choose &amp;quot;DownThemAll&amp;quot;, then &amp;quot;Save Link with DownThemAll&amp;quot;, this pops up a dialog where you can specify &amp;quot;*refqstring*.*ext*&amp;quot; in the Mask field - this will download with the filename &amp;quot;page=video&amp;amp;set=scene-title.mp4&amp;quot; where scene title is the actual scene title. You can later rename those files to remove the &amp;quot;page=video&amp;amp;set=&amp;quot; part of the filename.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I get the impression of a site built on a tight budget, with the lack of scene and model info in &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class3some&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classblowjob/&quot;&gt;ClassBlowjob&lt;/a&gt; a curious omission, because oddly, when clicking on a model&amp;#039;s page on the main site, any of her scenes from Class-Blowjob and Class-Threesome are listed along with a scene title, so the title and model info must be there in the background somewhere.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall I recommend &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; as the quality of the content makes up for the shortcomings.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=116000&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=116000&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2023 09:05:27 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_114974</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114974</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-05-22&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:31am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 96&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=24346&quot;&gt;Alybator&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=24346&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					In my opinion the best older/younger site, period&lt;br /&gt;
Eastern European women who are simply eye candy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no mention of a download limit and I did not find one&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Comes with three other excellent sites in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/sensualgirl/&quot;&gt;Sensual Girl&lt;/a&gt; Network&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
808 scenes are available for download in at least 720p high definition, 4K for the newest scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation is good on all their sites.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Not enough variety in the guys. Every one of them is in multiple scenes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The oldest scenes have lesser quality
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					They say imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. What can I say about a classic as well as iconic site that is often imitated and never equaled? I have been a member of other sites that pair older men with much younger women, but I feel this is the best there is of its type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I find that older men are sexy and I am not ashamed to say that. I feel that they are much more polite and gentlemanly than men close to my age and know how to appreciate a lady. On this site it says that for a man to apply to be a model, he must be at least 55. The same few men appear in many scenes, but I guess at that age there are not many guys who could be models. The women are a stark contrast though, as they appear to be barely legal to maybe at most age 25.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The age contrast is a major focus here as the scenes emphasize the fantasy very well. The most unlikely stories are brought to life. A man’s creditors come after him and a young lady offers herself to a group of guys as compensation instead of cash. A man is relaxing in the park and a model is so turned on by seeing him that she strips and then unzips his pants. The cleaning lady is wearing a French maid outfit. She bends over and shows him the goods. He calls a friend to tell him how sexy she is. In turn she overhears the conversation and takes his pants off. I am sure that someone is getting paid big bucks to come up with these ideas.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think the models are Eastern European and a few I do recognize such as Ria Sunn, Lady Dee and Gina Gershon. Most of the models are very thin, but a few have nice bodies that are more filled out and womanly. They look great here and I think better than I have seen them on other sites. They look so hot and sexy that I wish they had some lesbian scenes with them and older women. Why should older guys have all the fun? I also think they are in some of their first scenes as they look really young and more importantly fresh and eager to have a good time. I can imagine these guys bragging to their friends about being with these women.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have seen some of these guys on other older/younger sites too. I am very impressed by how well the guys perform. Some look very distinguished, with nice beards and some are not my cup of tea. The guys are not large by porn standards and the loads not the biggest you can find on the internet, but the fantasy works well for me anyway. I felt like the proverbial kid in the candy shop, wondering which scene or scenes I should watch today. It is tempting to skip work and stay home.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is easy to navigate and the videos seem to be in a number order. There are no dates, but the latest video is numbered 808. I see in the review by Exotics in October a video count of 799, so I think that there are about two updates a month. There are photo sets for each video, but I did not pay them any attention as I just am not into photos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the site that is the main attraction in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/sensualgirl/&quot;&gt;Sensual Girl&lt;/a&gt; Network. The others are &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/classnudes/&quot;&gt;Class Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, Class Blowjobs and Class Threesome. I liked all of them, but this one is by far my favorite.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114974&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=114974&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2022 11:31:16 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_114563</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114563</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-08-21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:25am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A premier old/young site that’s been around as long as I’ve been reviewing porn. &lt;br /&gt;
- The site is large (see cons) and currently is sitting on scene 799. &lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is clear and straightforward but it could be improved (see cons)&lt;br /&gt;
- Newest 125 or so scenes have 4K download option (see bottom line for full quality details).&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloadable photo sets and screenshots. &lt;br /&gt;
- Download speeds are good at 80% of my max. &lt;br /&gt;
- Pretty and young female models.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- It drives my OCD crazy when there aren’t dates on the scenes. There are none here but based on the last TBP review, it looks like they’ve added nearly 20 scenes in 2021, maybe 2 updates per month? &lt;br /&gt;
- The site has everything it needs in navigation but the way the scenes are laid out can make it a little frustrating. I will explain further in the Bottom  Line.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I actually remember this site from my very first year on Porn Users. I think it was one of the only old/young sites back then. It’s hard to believe but I was in my 20s when I started reviewing on Porn Users. I am now about to hit 42. Back then, I had no interest in watching a bunch of old guys have sex with 18-24 year old women. There is more to this niche than meets the eye. Do the Transformers owe me royalty for that? What you have here is the tale of Beauty and the Beast meets porn. Very attractive young women having sex with this old guys that look like they are probably someone’s grandfather. One of the things I’ve noticed that &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; advertises is Real Swallows and Kisses. There’s the more than meets the eye. I don’t think a porn site is pulling off anything special to talk a young woman into having sex with an older man for a paycheck. But, these scenes have a lot of touching, kissing and shows of affection and lust. You can buy lust. It’s not as easy to buy affection. The one time I joined this site before this time, I was impressed by the chemistry between the young women and older men. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To my surprise and let me add happiness, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; doesn’t stray from older man/younger woman. I’m still not too open to the younger men/older women niche. At least not on this big of an age difference. I don’t think I would enjoy watching an 18 year old guy have sex with a 67 year old woman. I’m reviewing porn, doesn’t that tell you I can be shallow? &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My complaint about the layout should be furthered a little. They have the newest scene showing when you sign in and below it is one that isn’t numbered and says, “special”. That’s what happens when you number your scenes. That’s 799, then “special” scene just below it. Below special scene is scene 798. It may be OCD at work. I don’t know why those special scenes are in-between the numbered scenes. I don’t know if those are numbered elsewhere on the site or if they are bonus scenes. You can download them. Clicking the model’s name doesn’t help. It opens the models scenes up but no numbers on those. You all are starting to realize why I’ve been married 3 times. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Don’t let that take away from what is a very entertaining site in this niche. They have Gina Gershon in a gangbang with older men. I think you have to put yourself in the older men’s mindset, I’m going straight to hell for this, you know those older guys are looking at each other and saying, “I finally have a story to tell my adult grandchildren.” It does make it entertaining. These are not “stunt cocks”, this is one of the greatest moments of these men’s lives. It’s a fun site. Even if I’m not that into the older/younger niche. I can appreciate it more now than 14 years ago. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They also have very good quality. The newer scenes have 4K, 1080, 720 and 540 in the download options. There are downloadable photo sets and downloadable screenshots. It’s becoming pretty common to just accept that if we at least get pictures we should be happy. These pictures are 2000 long end. I’ve said it before, that’s better than no pictures. On the videos, I find the 720p plenty clear and crisp enough to download those. I’m go back into their older scenes, back when some of these young women were starting kindergarten. If the older guys performances don’t impress you, this will, every scene, unless I missed one, has at least 720p download. I don’t think you can ask for more than that from a site that has been around this long. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn’t list this as a con since it’s becoming so common. The site is a free-scroll site. Scroll, let more scenes load, scroll, let more scenes load. I know a few members have talked about not liking that. I don’t either but it’s not that bad. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you’re into older and younger porn you definitely should check this site out and it comes with a couple other sites. They also have an &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; threesome site. The tags seem to work well on this site. There’s not a lot to complain about. Unless you’re just turned off by the niche itself. There are threesomes on here with the old guy taking care of two younger women. I think porn like this is a nice break from stunt cocks, the same nearly violent hardcore scenes that we’re seeing in mainstream porn today. Much more impressed than I would have been when I was 28.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=114563&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=114563&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2021 10:25:47 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_108970</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=108970</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-07-19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=331&quot;&gt;pinkerton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=331&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Exclusive hardcore content from a not so common niche of old guys fucking young girls.&lt;br /&gt;
-Main site includes 711 scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
-Includes Class-Blowjob (137 scenes), Class-Threesome (80 scenes) and Class-Nudes (382 photosets) sites.&lt;br /&gt;
-Beautiful girls mostly Euro but some US, includes some well-known hardcore performers from both sides of the pond.&lt;br /&gt;
-Can stream videos and browse photosets, with options to download.&lt;br /&gt;
-Reasonable downloaded video file sizes.&lt;br /&gt;
-Works with a download manager.&lt;br /&gt;
-Site works well on mobile devices.&lt;br /&gt;
-Can download photosets as ZIP files (but not in Class-Blowjob).&lt;br /&gt;
-Most content is at least 720p HD with more recent content 1080p and 4K.&lt;br /&gt;
-Good production values with great camera angles in the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is straightforward and works okay on main site (but see cons), including browsing by model and model/scene search; can also select scenes by tag (anal, DP, doggie-style, etc).&lt;br /&gt;
-Reliable biller and easy account management/cancellation.&lt;br /&gt;
-Support seem very responsive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Expensive with no PU (or any other) discount.&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus sites no longer updating.&lt;br /&gt;
-No confirmation email with details on sign-up - you must note your site-generated username and password.&lt;br /&gt;
-Despite variety of opening stories, scenes generally a bit samey with same positions and endings.&lt;br /&gt;
-If you like cumshots, you may be disappointed (see bottom line).&lt;br /&gt;
-Very basic navigation, with no model info at all in Class-Blowjob and Class-Threesome, with no scene name in the video listings and Class-Blowjob site has no model or scene name at all.&lt;br /&gt;
-No info on when scene was added and listings don&amp;#039;t seem to be ordered by date.&lt;br /&gt;
-Downloading is very tedious - the default filename just says 1080.mp4, 720.mp4 etc, leaving you to type in a meaningful download filename.&lt;br /&gt;
-Cannot download Class-Blowjob photos as a single ZIP file.&lt;br /&gt;
-No favourites facility; comments or rating system.&lt;br /&gt;
-Short login timeouts.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some links don&amp;#039;t work properly (see bottom line) for a while after first starting to browse the sites.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-I&amp;#039;d always thought of joining &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; after seeing sample content. There&amp;#039;s something heartening seeing wrinkled, bald, pot-bellied old guys fucking beautiful young girls who seem to enjoy it (most scenes seem to show great chemistry between performers) with the action gentler than the usual hardcore, after all, old guys are less likely to have as much energy as their younger counterparts.&lt;br /&gt;
-A typical &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; scene starts with a girl (or girls) wanting sex with a guy old enough to be her father or Grandpa,  he resists, she kisses him deeply which arouses him, he yields and she takes his cock in her mouth, he eats her pussy and when ready, fucks her and she fucks him in various positions, there&amp;#039;ll be a 69 and the scene ends with her taking his cum in her mouth and either swallowing or dripping it from her mouth. Having said that, many scenes differ and may involve more than one guy and a girl, or girls, there are a few anal scenes, there&amp;#039;s even a few DPs and gangbangs, and some cumshots involve a huge splash of cum on the girl&amp;#039;s face, chest or pussy, but if you like facials or lots of cum, you may be disappointed.  If you like outdoor scenes then you&amp;#039;ll be very happy as a lot of the content is outdoors, either in a garden or in the woods.&lt;br /&gt;
-The camerawork is very good and there are some positions you see a lot of here that you don&amp;#039;t often see on other h/c sites, such as 69 and the girl fucked lying face down, for example. The deep kissing in some of the scenes and with the old guy on top of the girl whilst fucking her are also hot.&lt;br /&gt;
-The sites Class-Blowjob and Class-Threesome don&amp;#039;t necessarily involve old men and scenes are more conventional with one or more girls sucking a cock and two or more girls fucking a guy (or guys).&lt;br /&gt;
-Nude Art is 382 photosets of girls in underwear, stripping off, some with a 1-2 minute video of the same.&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is basic but functional and the search facility finds models and scenes, but the lack of a favourites facility is a major failing. The lack of scene and model information in Class-Blowjob and Class-Threesome means keeping track of your downloading is more difficult.&lt;br /&gt;
-Video quality is good with very reasonable downloaded file sizes, though some of the oldest 720p content is a bit &amp;quot;soft&amp;quot; in video quality, a few of which are quite &amp;quot;blocky&amp;quot;, but only a few scenes suffer from that; also a few old scenes which aren&amp;#039;t originally HD have been re-encoded at 720p which just looks crap with the empty space either side of the content, but all these are minor gripes.&lt;br /&gt;
-I get the impression that the site has been built on a tight budget, though the lack of scene and model info in the bonus sites is easily fixed, which leaves me wondering why it hasn&amp;#039;t been, unless of course no-one has fed that back to the site admins. Oddly enough, when clicking on a model page, if the list of her scenes includes one from either Class-Blowjob or Class-Threesome, there is a scene name against the link to the scene so obviously the scene does have a name, but it&amp;#039;s just not shown in the actual scene page on the target site.&lt;br /&gt;
-Going into the navigation in more detail, browsing the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; home page shows a paged list of scenes with preview photos, clicking on the scene opens the scene page from where you can view the streamed video, screenshots, photoset or you can download the photos and screenshots as ZIP files or the videos as 4K UHD, 1080 HD, 720 HD, 540 sd or 272 SD all MP4 format; older content also offers 1080 and 720 WMV files which are almost 3 times the file size of the MP4s, yet there&amp;#039;s no discernable difference in quality so given the ubiquity of the MP4 video format, I do wonder why WMV files are also offered.  The streaming video player/viewer is functional - no fancy features such as frame thumbnails as you drag the progress slider - but streaming worked fine and with minimal lag.&lt;br /&gt;
-File downloads speeds are excellent at 8Mb/s on a fibre broadband connection.&lt;br /&gt;
-I did encounter issues on the day of joining: in many of the latest scene pages I was unable to play the video (player area was blank) or download files. Customer support responded by email 15 mins later, saying that it took a few minutes for the account to fully activate all video connections.  So I closed my browser, waited a few hours and tried again and all was okay, but then found another issue with some videos being only 9 secs long and containing random content - again customer support were very responsive and when trying again later everything worked fine.&lt;br /&gt;
-Worth mentioning that there are ads for other Class Media sites but they&amp;#039;re not intrusive.&lt;br /&gt;
-Overall I recommend &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; as the quality of the content (for me) makes up for the shortcomings I&amp;#039;ve talked about.  Production quality is good and the content is enjoyable with a mix of pro and semi-pro beautiful girls.&lt;br /&gt;
-Finally, if you fancy your chances of being an &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;, you can apply for a job with them so long as you are 55 years old or older and like adventure and young beauties.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=108970&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=108970&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2019 04:04:15 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_80870</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=80870</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-02-13&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+They offer exclusif content from a niche that is not well represented.&lt;br /&gt;
+They add about one new scene per week.&lt;br /&gt;
+Almost 380 scenes to download.&lt;br /&gt;
+The 50 or so most recent videos are now offered in multiple download fomats and resolution is as high as 1280x720.&lt;br /&gt;
+They appear to have remastered some of their more recent upates as well.&lt;br /&gt;
+There is some decent chemistry between the performers.&lt;br /&gt;
+They offer class3some, nude art and classic blowjob with your membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-They still do not offer any model info so you have to do some serious research to frind their name from other sources.&lt;br /&gt;
-The bonus sites may be nice for some people but only class3some has similar content.&lt;br /&gt;
-class3some has stopped updating last year so you are not getting new stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is basically picking a page number and there are no search options. &lt;br /&gt;
-They have photos but the quantity is tiny and is mostly there so that you get an idea of what is happening in the video.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*I decided to join &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; one more time in part because they decided to add clas3some to their membership.  That was one of my cons the last time I joined.  Sadly I got excited for nothing because the site isn&amp;#039;t updating anymore.  They also give you access to two other sites but since they do not exactly offer the same type of content then I didn&amp;#039;t bother looking at them.  Mind you someone into oral sex or nudes might be happy with those additions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I was pleasantly surprised to see that they are now offering the videos in higher resolution as well as motre stndard ones.  They still don&amp;#039;t bother putting the models name on the videos and that really sucks.  I can begin to tell you how annoying it is to do research on a model so that I can properlly file the video.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I recently commented on the fact that none of the performers in the Score 50 and Score 60 videos kiss and that it was too bad because it made the scenes a lot less fun to watch.  This is not the case with &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; because there is some serious kissing between the young girls and the old men.  The sex is never raunchy.  It is more soft and romantic.  Now some could argue that the guys being older couldn&amp;#039;t do super hardcore but I think that the producers prefer the softer stuff and I agree with their choice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**This is such a rare niche that unless you are a fan then you should stay away**.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=80870&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=80870&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 10:53:46 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_71589</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71589</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-07-12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:57am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+They have exclusif content from a niche that&amp;#039;s not well represented on the net.&lt;br /&gt;
+They have an very good selection of female European performers.&lt;br /&gt;
+The sex scenes are well filmed and the males do a pretty decent job considering their age.&lt;br /&gt;
+They have 352 videos but only the last 32 are in a single file.  All the others are broken into 2 or more files.&lt;br /&gt;
+Video resolution is at least 720x404 for more than 100 videos and the last 32 are now 1280x720.&lt;br /&gt;
+They appear to still be updating with new content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-They no longer offer class3some as a bonus site and that is too bad because it was a nice addition considering the high cost of the site.&lt;br /&gt;
-They don&amp;#039;t offer any model info whatsoever so it requires a lot of research to find the names to go with most videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-They don&amp;#039;t date their content so it&amp;#039;s very hard to know the update schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
-They have photos but the quality is mostly poor and they often appear to be out of order.  Not to mention that you have to download each pic one by one since they aren&amp;#039;t in a complete zip file.&lt;br /&gt;
-There is no navigation except the page number or the ability to jump all the way to the beginning or the end of the pages.&lt;br /&gt;
-There&amp;#039;s music in their videos and that can be a plus but I found at certain times to be  distracting.&lt;br /&gt;
-The first 100 videos are only offered in Real media so not very good news.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*This is a pretty decent site with content that is good to excellent but is dragged down by all the negative things that could easily be fixed if they bothered with it.  They don&amp;#039;t have  a lot of male performers to choose from but the ones they have do a better than average job and there appears to be some good chemistry with the female performers which seems hard to believe when you consider the age difference between the males and the females.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*There&amp;#039;s dialogue in some of the videos and it&amp;#039;s normally in English.  It&amp;#039;s more often a miss because English is not the language that these people speak but it&amp;#039;s not awful.  The music is a little annoying.  It&amp;#039;s not too loud because that would make it almost impossible to watch the videos with the sound on. Mind you I wouldn&amp;#039;t be sad if it disapeared.  I think just the natural sounds of the performer is more than enough for the viewers anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*I like that they are now offering their videos in a single file and that the resolution is also increased to 1280x720.  Now if someone can start entering the names of the models in the database and put dates on their content then they&amp;#039;ll have improved on most key issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**If you want to watch old men have sex with much younger women than this is probably the best site for that.  They even have a few anal scenes as well so if that is one of your fetishes then you&amp;#039;ll find a few videos.  Be advised that it may not be in the description of the scene so you&amp;#039;ll have to either download all the videos or check out the photos to find those scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
***Of course if you don&amp;#039;t want to watch old guys have sex with very young women than avoid this site.  Especially now since they no longer offer class3some and that site had mostly yojg women with younger men.***
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=71589&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=71589&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 06:57:50 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_68945</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68945</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-05-12&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:13am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=12376&quot;&gt;selphy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=12376&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)&lt;br /&gt;
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)&lt;br /&gt;
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos&lt;br /&gt;
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I&amp;#039;ve deleted those files...)&lt;br /&gt;
-No model info&lt;br /&gt;
-Old files are divided in two or three parts&lt;br /&gt;
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)&lt;br /&gt;
-No update info (1 new episode per week)&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha). &lt;br /&gt;
-The server timeout is too short; it&amp;#039;s about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in&lt;br /&gt;
-No bonus site (I thought that the other &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class3some&lt;/a&gt; site was included)&lt;br /&gt;
-The are music inside the video and often you can&amp;#039;t hear the &amp;quot;voice&amp;quot;  of the performers.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.&lt;br /&gt;
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.&lt;br /&gt;
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!&lt;br /&gt;
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site ! &lt;br /&gt;
The same company has also &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class3some&lt;/a&gt;: it appears a good site (the same girls of &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;) with only about 50 video.&lt;br /&gt;
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/class3some/&quot;&gt;Class3some&lt;/a&gt; togheter with &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt;, I think the 30 euro price is correct.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=68945&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=68945&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:13:50 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_55010</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55010</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-22-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:51am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 77&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=505&quot;&gt;pat362&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=505&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-There appears to be genuine heat between the performers with lots of deep kissing, good BJ and the sex is also well done.&lt;br /&gt;
-They have some super cute teen girls.&lt;br /&gt;
-The age difference between the girls and men is significant so that adds to the fetish aspect.&lt;br /&gt;
-They currently have over 300 videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus site included with membership.&lt;br /&gt;
-You can use a download manager.&lt;br /&gt;
-They appear to still be updating but since they don&amp;#039;t date their updates so that makes it hard to say the frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
-They speak in English ins ome of the vieos.&lt;br /&gt;
-There is some scenario to the scenes.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-By far my biggest issue with what would have been a great site is the background music that is so annoying that you almost have to watch the videos with the sound off.&lt;br /&gt;
-Movies are all broken down in sections of 2 to 4 pieces.&lt;br /&gt;
-Little to no model info means you&amp;#039;ll have to be familiar with Eastern Europeans models or do a lot of research to identify them.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photo cannot be downloaded in a complete set but then again they are pretty useless so it&amp;#039;s not worth bothering with.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-This site has the potential to be in the high 80&amp;#039;s and even in the 90&amp;#039;s but the soundtrack has to go, they have to offer their videos as one file, they have to put a time stamp on their content and they need a models index.  If they are able to do that then I&amp;#039;d gladly return more often.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wasn&amp;#039;t thrilled about the split videos but the content is so great that I would still have given the site a score of above 80 but I found the soundtrack to be so distracting that I had to drop my score.  It&amp;#039;s till worth seeing if you like the old and young fetish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
They offer a bonus site called class3some and it&amp;#039;s basically the same girls that appear on oldje but here it&amp;#039;s at least 2 girls with one guy.  The men are much younger that those at oldje. The videos are also broken in 2 sections and there is no model info.  They currently have over 40 videos.  You can download photosets in a zip format but frankly it would also be a waste of time.  &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; should have added a second site but with multiple older men with one or two women&lt;br /&gt;
and that would have been a better fit than what we get with class3some.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=55010&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=55010&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 08:51:53 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_54569</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54569</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-06-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:00am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;slutty&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6571&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Attractive euro women&lt;br /&gt;
-Reasonably well filmed scenes&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM&lt;br /&gt;
-Download managers work, although mine did have some timeout problems (I tried DTA and GetRight)&lt;br /&gt;
-Looks to be all original content&lt;br /&gt;
-Scenes have a &amp;quot;plot&amp;quot; to some extent&lt;br /&gt;
-Zip downloads of some photosets (in rar)&lt;br /&gt;
-Photo quality is variable, newer material is good&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus site is pretty interesting (class3-some), although has most of the same cons as this site&lt;br /&gt;
-Decent sized archive (300+ scenes), although about half of it is poor quality.&lt;br /&gt;
-Newer video quality is pretty good, 1280x720 8000 kbps was the best I saw, although the video doesn&amp;#039;t look as good as the specs might suggest.  &lt;br /&gt;
-The mid-aged material was decent at 720x400 3000 kbps.  I don&amp;#039;t have specs on the RM material, but the file sizes are very small and look very poor.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Poor navigation&lt;br /&gt;
-Logins timeout relatively fast&lt;br /&gt;
-Expensive, about $40 US at current exchange rate&lt;br /&gt;
-Slowish download speeds, best I saw was 400 KB/s using DTA&lt;br /&gt;
-Poor navigation, no model index, no search function, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
-Older videos are RealMedia, and very poor quality.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some sets don&amp;#039;t have photosets associated with them, only screencaps, and some sets don&amp;#039;t have zips.&lt;br /&gt;
-Most videos are in multiple parts, between 2 and 4 was typical.&lt;br /&gt;
-Video quality on newer material is pretty good, older material is quite poor.&lt;br /&gt;
-Limited download options, newer material is wmv (high or low) older material is realmedia only (high or dialup - neither are &amp;quot;high&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
-I have no idea what the update schedule is, no dates on the scenes, but I somehow doubt it is frequent
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The material on this site is pretty decent, there are certainly some attractive ladies.  Personally I am not a fan of the young/old fetish, I joined mostly because of the attractive ladies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is a pity that the site makes it so hard to get at their content.  The navigation is poor, most of the scenes do not even give the model a name.  A model index would be nice, just for sorting purposes.  The navigation pretty much consists of a list of scenes with some preview pictures, with 5 scenes on each page.  Pretty much nothing else.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The scenes themselves are pretty good, although the editing can be a bit odd.  Most of the scenes I downloaded have quite loud background music that pretty much drowns out everything else.  This is one of the only sites I can think of that uses slow motion during sex scenes, and the slow motion is a bit odd to me.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I did not have any experience with customer support, so I can&amp;#039;t comment on that.  There is no user forum or anything of that nature.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I actually very much liked the bonus content.  Although some of the scenes are a bit weird (like a guy has sex with two ladies, then two other ladies, etc.).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall I think this site is decent, it would be nice to see them provide a model index and fix some of their many download and navigation issues.  Given the price, it is hard to recommend unless there are specific models you like in the preview (or you are really fond of old/young niche).  The bonus site is nice, but certainly doesn&amp;#039;t make it worth the price for me.  If you like to see &amp;quot;attractive men&amp;quot; in scenes, this is most definitely not the site for you, as many are fat, old and hairy (not that there is anything wrong with that...)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=54569&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=54569&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2010 00:00:02 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_49064</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49064</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-21-10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:08pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 66&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7783&quot;&gt;BabyGetReal&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7783&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Creative scenarios, very unusual.&lt;br /&gt;
Gorgeous slim women, many very cute.&lt;br /&gt;
Mostly natural breasts.&lt;br /&gt;
As a 70 year old, the fantasy of a beautiful young woman coming onto me is very attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
Dialog, when there is any, is in English.&lt;br /&gt;
Guys don&amp;#039;t walk on already hard.&lt;br /&gt;
Normal sized dicks.&lt;br /&gt;
No brainless rough hard banging away.&lt;br /&gt;
No fake moaning.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Boring, repetitive, passionless sex.&lt;br /&gt;
Apparently no interest in arousing the women.&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes it appears that the men coming is the girls mouths is faked, with fake semen preloaded in the girls mouths.&lt;br /&gt;
The price is WAY WAY too high ($38/month).&lt;br /&gt;
Early vids very low res; later ones low res or OK; a few very recent ones are stunningly hires.&lt;br /&gt;
Too many long closeups.&lt;br /&gt;
Downloads all have the same names so you have to rename every one.&lt;br /&gt;
There is usually annoyingly loud music that doesn&amp;#039;t fade out -- but it doesn&amp;#039;t matter because nobody ever really gets aroused.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A couple of the very recent very high resolution videos are in beautiful outdoor settings. They move slowly and sensuously, with a lot of kissing. About half of the videos are scripted with the guys taking advantage of the girls (I can do without that). In the other half, the girls tease and come onto the guys -- which I love. So I had high anticipation about this site -- but it turned out to be one of the least arousing sites to which I&amp;#039;ve subscribed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The creativity and variety of the scenarios is really unusual and is the best thing about this site. Also the lack of hard banging and rushed sex. The slow sensuous approach is refreshing. Unfortunately, this is coupled with terrible directing and editing -- if the goal is to be erotic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The director/editor seems to insist on so many minutes each for a series of positions, without any concern for what is actually happening. There is no chemistry between any of the couples. They show no evidence of having fun, being playful, or getting aroused. There is no spontaneity. Apparently they are just doing what the director told them to do. Even if a little spark starts to grow, they are told to change positions and it kills any spark that started.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In only one or maybe two of all the 30 videos that I watched, the girls actually got aroused and maybe orgasmed. This was not respected, featured, emphasized -- the director/editor did not seem to notice or care that this happened -- it was incidental -- and it was not erotic to watch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The emphasis is on the girl pleasuring the man. Most have very brief cunnilingus or finger fucking, but only to please the man, and it stops after a moment, regardless of whether the woman might show a little spark of excitement. All videos end with a blow job and the guy (supposedly) coming in the girl&amp;#039;s mouth. In some cases the guy jacks off and really comes; in others, the girl blows him and maybe he really comes, or it is faked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A give away about the attitude in this site is that in all the preview stills that label each video, very few if any show the girl with an expression of actual enjoyment or arousal. Instead, she is always looking at the camera with her mouth open, a sure sign that she is not aroused.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For what this site offers, the price is WAY WAY too high (30 euros, about $38/month). Actresses names are not given. There is no search mechanism. There are no dates for the &amp;quot;updates&amp;quot;. Most of the videos have poor resolution.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bonus site (class-3some) is even worse.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is unusual that I download 30 videos from a site and don&amp;#039;t find a single one that I want to keep, but that is what happened here. They seemed to have a good idea and some real creativity, but the direction/editing kills any eroticism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes they show outtakes at the end, and in these, often the actors are laughing and having fun -- unlike in the main video!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
CONTINUED IN A &amp;quot;REPLY&amp;quot;
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=49064&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=49064&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 19:08:14 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_35677</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35677</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-01-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:29am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Young easteuro-models at their best.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Fine style in videos - fine style of fantasy.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Video-quality is almost crisp (the newer ones) and even some of the .rm-files are ok.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Young girls being very seducive - thanks to a good working editor, I guess.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Entirely exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
+ Ok/fine number of video-scenes (almost 300)&lt;br /&gt;
+ Well done for a special kind af fantasies.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Price a bit high - euro 29.95 - but at TBP the $-price seems much to high compared to the price in euros. Compared the price in $ should be about 35. Guess this one is the other way around with those infamous currency-problems.&lt;br /&gt;
No &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; photosets - the photos in each set are way too few and the quality (960x640) are not that great.&lt;br /&gt;
Could not find any zip for those sets.&lt;br /&gt;
Very simple navigation/browsing - no search engines or name-search for girl-models. You nhave to browse through the now 27 pages with aproxx 10 videos pr page.&lt;br /&gt;
Most videos in split files. (But they are joinable).&lt;br /&gt;
No bonus sites.&lt;br /&gt;
Couold not find any update-schedule - now it looks like one or two pr week.&lt;br /&gt;
Repeated login.&lt;br /&gt;
Very early videos (2-3 years old or more) not worth much.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have quite a few cons for this site - BUT still it&amp;#039;s as close to a 90 in score as it gets.&lt;br /&gt;
Foremost this is a site with a very speciel fantasy for older porn-lovers and lovers of teens.&lt;br /&gt;
This is a dutch site with a slogan for their videos:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The fantasy you deserve&amp;quot; - pretty good marketing, because it tends to older guys (like this user close to 50) with the everlasting dream of sweet young things - but well married and no more ideas about trying to catch/or cheat with an 18-19 years old girl.&lt;br /&gt;
Here you get it on videoclips. Must scenes are definitely fantasy, because the main theme is the teen seducing the 50-65 year old guy.&lt;br /&gt;
See the fine previews - and you&amp;#039;ll get the idea.&lt;br /&gt;
The videos are (almost) all set in different ways - and thats a fine plus. Not much stereotype here.&lt;br /&gt;
And once in a while you get a little surprise with some minuttes slow-motion of the best blowjob/fuck in the middle of the scene. &lt;br /&gt;
A little over half of the aproxx 300 videos comes in both wmv and Real Media (I normally dislike rm-files) - the wmv quality is FINE - 720x404.&lt;br /&gt;
BUT most of the rm-files are certainly not bad in quality either - I&amp;#039;m just not crazy about the only way to play them.&lt;br /&gt;
The models are simply great here - for most of them. Fine looking young teen - blondes, brunettes and redhairs - and the way they act here seems much sweeter ( and somewhat sexier) than at some other productions.&lt;br /&gt;
Some are well known: Sharka Blue, Black Angelica, Jenny/Wibeke or Bijou ect. (man, just watching that natural-titted Bijou-brunette seducing this old guy....)&lt;br /&gt;
Others are quite rare/almost never seen at other sites.&lt;br /&gt;
But the way the seduction of older guys are done here makes this site - probably - the best of its kind.&lt;br /&gt;
Visited the site some years ago - today it&amp;#039;s simply way better.&lt;br /&gt;
More regular updates - and I&amp;#039;d stay here (for some time, anyway).&lt;br /&gt;
To be recommended.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35677&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=35677&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 06:29:01 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_35169</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35169</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-19-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:31am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=7192&quot;&gt;tikkit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=7192&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ The girls here are more attractive than other Euro Old &amp;amp; Young sites such as Old Farts &amp;amp; Young Tarts, and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/grandpasfuckteens/&quot;&gt;Grandpas Fuck Teens&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+ Cinematography - Yes, you can laugh but much thought and work goes into the art side of things, with style, slo-mo&amp;#039;s, zooming, and such&lt;br /&gt;
+ I love oldje&amp;#039;s style of video, the videos are Unique, stories are not repeated very often, I geniually look foward to the updates&lt;br /&gt;
+ tour provides an accurate representation of what will be available when/if you subscribe
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- scenes are short&lt;br /&gt;
- the amount of sex in scenes is SHORT, though the more recent videos have improved upon this.&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive for American Subscribers, may be only worth it to join for one month and thats it.&lt;br /&gt;
- No full scene files, though this really does not bother me much&lt;br /&gt;
- the actors in the scenes try to speak english, just speak in your native language, who cares!&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates come every two weeks on Friday, not that often but understandable&lt;br /&gt;
- no zip picture files, Beauty and the senior has much better picture sets&lt;br /&gt;
- Older videos are of Real Player Only and BAD quality
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is great, but has flaws, why don&amp;#039;t they combine &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; and B&amp;amp;TS for one really great site with pictures and videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=35169&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=35169&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 01:31:03 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_31804</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=31804</link>
                <description></description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 04:54:34 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14228</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14228</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-29-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 87&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=996&quot;&gt;djwolf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=996&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No other site around like this&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
- Hot young women (genuine)&lt;br /&gt;
- Looks realistic&lt;br /&gt;
- Good video quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Option to preview video pictures&lt;br /&gt;
- Updated regularly
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Fairly expensive&lt;br /&gt;
- Some scenes are oral only&lt;br /&gt;
- Picture quality could be better&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are split up&lt;br /&gt;
- Basic menu with no search facility
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;Oldje&lt;/a&gt; is a one-off site where young girls are getting it on with older men. It&amp;#039;s all genuine and looks pretty realistic (occasional poor acting in certain scenes).&lt;br /&gt;
The girls are mostly hot with nice tight bodies on show, most scenes show them naked. The men are not particularly nice to look at though!&lt;br /&gt;
There is a fair amount of content which is updated weekly. There are pictures available for recent shoots with around 40-50 in each set. The quality could be improved. The videos are the best part of the site with at least 150 on offer. The videos are split into 2 or 3 real media clips which last about 6-8 minutes each. You can see preview pictures of the videos which is very useful. The video quality is good with a nice amateur feel to it.&lt;br /&gt;
The site itself looks good but the menu system is rather basic. The video and picture sets are not sorted into any categories or dated. There is also no way to search for a specific girl. &lt;br /&gt;
This is a very good site which charges a high price but offers exclusive quality content and pretty girls.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14228&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14228&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 15:22:54 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6868</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6868</link>
                <description></description>
                <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 05:25:08 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2946</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2946</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-11-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:08am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1038&quot;&gt;DutchDoctor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1038&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1. Actors are old indeed and the girls are around 20;&lt;br /&gt;
2. Beautiful European girls, mostly without terrible tatoos;&lt;br /&gt;
3. Nice settings;&lt;br /&gt;
4. Excellent high-resolution photo&amp;#039;s.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1. Scenes could have more &amp;#039;exciting&amp;#039; sex;&lt;br /&gt;
2. Only in Real Media, which I don&amp;#039;t like;&lt;br /&gt;
3. The oldest movies are not so good.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a quality-site with Old&amp;amp;Young stuff, which is quite rare to find. It has been produced in The Netherlands and Belgium, so without the &amp;#039;barbie-looking&amp;#039; US-porn-stars or the East-European wallpapers with flowers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When this is your &amp;#039;cup-of-tea&amp;#039;, this site is well worth to visit!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2946&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2946&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:08:59 PDT</pubDate>
            </item>
                        <item>
                <guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_206</guid>
                <title>Oldje Review</title>
                <link>https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=206</link>
                <description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;https://assets.thebestporn.com/logos/oldje.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Oldje&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/review/oldje/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-08-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:56pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 60&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=95&quot;&gt;DpornGuy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=95&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Exclusive content and models&lt;br /&gt;
Fresh faces, mostly young too&lt;br /&gt;
good layout and concepts
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					content very similar&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality not jaw dropping&lt;br /&gt;
RealMedia Format only downloads&lt;br /&gt;

					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					An original Old on Young site, with european hotties, but sadly the sex at times is very dull or similar to previous scenes, with very little variety..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The girls are very hot though, and you won&amp;#039;t find many sites that offer exclusive content that is only hardcore.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10927&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Oldje&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=206&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=206&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
                <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:56:14 PST</pubDate>
            </item>
                </channel>
</rss>