<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - DOMAI - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_67163</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=67163</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-08-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:11pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=16113&quot;&gt;RLane&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=16113&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Stunning models&lt;br /&gt;
-Great variety of models&lt;br /&gt;
-Quick download speed&lt;br /&gt;
-Some 3000x1999px images&lt;br /&gt;
-Great price for amount of content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-No videos&lt;br /&gt;
-A lot of sets don't have images higher than, 2000px
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Overall this is a great soft core porn site with a great selection of models; although, it's sister site (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;GoddessNudes&lt;/a&gt;) has better image sizes then this one. It has a really good navigation model list, but when you go to a letter of models, you'll have to go back to the member's page. They do update everyday and they have a good selection of bonus items on the bottom right of the model index. Overall, I would recommend this to anyone.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=67163&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=67163&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 19:11:25 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_63804</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=63804</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-27-11&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:34pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;431&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- A site that is only about nude photos, no videos here and most of the photos are non-sexual poses. The selling point for me to join was that I liked several of the models and the price is right at $9.95 per month. &lt;br /&gt;
- Really nice pictures, I like the lighting, they also come zipped. &lt;br /&gt;
- I personally didn't have any problems with navigation and thought it was very easy to use. It's one of those sites where you start at A on the model index, click A, scan through those models, go to B, and so on. &lt;br /&gt;
- If you are interested in photography, I would say this site would be a nice place to start. It's very artsy.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Well, if you're coming here to find anything that doesn't require some imagination to enjoy from a sexual standpoint, you're out of luck. &lt;br /&gt;
- This is actually a con based on the sister site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;Goddess Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, the photos could be bigger, most of what I have downloaded top out at 1999 long end. I've not scanned through all of them, but the majority have been around the 2000 long end range. &lt;br /&gt;
- There's not much tease or strip here. The model I was most interested in, Zulfija, doesn't have a clothed picture on the site! &lt;br /&gt;
- I personally think &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;Goddess Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, ran by the same company, is a better site if you at least want some sexuality in the photos and the photos are bigger, plus it's only $4.95 a month.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I don't think I can write much more about this site than the pros/cons cover. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site has been around a long time. The content to me is softer than what I consider softcore. This can be a problem since most of the models start out a set already nude, but never really show anything more than they do in the 1st picture of the set. I do respect that this is the style of site Domai is, but I just can't get that excited over looking at sexy, naked women staring off into space. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are bright spots here though. The quality of the photos are very good, lots of natural lighting in the outdoor shots, good price, daily updates and if you like using your imagination, this site will really let you do that. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has been said before so I won't go into it too deeply. There are no videos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One other thing that is probably just me being used to larger photo sets, the photo sets I have downloaded seem to average between 40-60 photos. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the positive side because I am going to recommend this site to those looking for softer content, artistic content. The choice of models is very good. I will add that there are some sets that have photos topping out at 3000 long end. If there are others that are bigger, I haven't found them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a package deal to join both Domai and the sister site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;Goddess Nudes&lt;/a&gt;, but the offer I received was for $44.95 for both for 3 months. I just joined Domai for $9.95/mo. then joined &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;Goddess Nudes&lt;/a&gt; for $4.95/mo. which equals out to the same price as the multi-month option. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I really can't suggest anything to change except the size of the photos. I'm sure they have established a fanbase that loves this style of nude photos and respect that. As I said in the cons, I would recommend &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/goddessnudes/&quot;&gt;Goddess Nudes&lt;/a&gt; over it in a head to head comparison just because the photos are a little more sexual and have higher resolutions. Makes a nice pairing of sites for $15 too. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, if you're not wanting videos, not wanting anything real sexual and are just looking for some nice quality nude photography, I would recommend it based on the low price. If you're looking for anything more than very soft softcore, I wouldn't recommend it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=63804&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=63804&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:34:50 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_29695</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29695</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-09-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:47pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6063&quot;&gt;TalonIcefire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6063&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
Simplistic &amp;amp; natural Beauty&lt;br /&gt;
Decent photo quality&lt;br /&gt;
Cheap membership&lt;br /&gt;
Simple site navigation&lt;br /&gt;
Daily updates
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Website design (I know kids that have designed better websites)&lt;br /&gt;
Model navigation &amp;amp; naming convention (what you see in the sample pages is what you get in the membership pages)&lt;br /&gt;
As low as 6 pictures in a photo set (6-15 photos is not a real set)&lt;br /&gt;
No bonus site links
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site focuses on woman aged 18-23. Stats are as follows: &lt;br /&gt;
Photos | Watermarks - Small strip on bottom of image, Photo quality - 1067 x 1600 &amp;amp; 2400 x 1600, Zip Files, Number of sets - Over 500 (06-60 per set), Update rate - Daily&lt;br /&gt;
Site Design | Search Engine - Model index &amp;amp; year, Simple design (Poor naming convention), No browsing categories, No real extra features (will not discuss the sites freebies)&lt;br /&gt;
Models / Content | Exclusive, Original, Models attractiveness - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, Amateur models, Good Angles &amp;amp; Lighting&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;DOMAI&lt;/a&gt; is neither sexually orientated nor fine art. It is about the natural beauty of the model. I would not even categorize it as porn. This site is for the connoisseur of all that is beautiful.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29695&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=29695&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 14:47:45 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_29504</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29504</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-05-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:58pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 73&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5645&quot;&gt;Jeffrey99&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5645&quot;&gt;27&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Good price ($19.95 not rebilled or $14.95 rebilled)&lt;br /&gt;
+Good quality photos (1333x2000px)&lt;br /&gt;
+On average updated almost daily.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-No videos&lt;br /&gt;
-No search function&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation is horrible (no models page) Everything is sorted by update. So while a model may have 6 different sets on there, there is no way to find out untill you get to that update. &lt;br /&gt;
-Evertyhing is sorted by year, then by update date.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My main problem with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt; is the same problem I have with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femjoy/&quot;&gt;Femjoy&lt;/a&gt;, each model starts out nude. Or if she's not full nude, she will be within 5 images. Then you have 40 images that all start to look the same. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The navigation is horrible. You can't search for body type, hair color or even model name. Everything is listed first by year, since 2005, then by date that they were added. So if you find a model you like, there is no way to see her other sets or even to find out if she has other sets. Technically you can cheat and look at the web address to see what gallery you are in, then you'd know if they have any other sets&lt;br /&gt;
 available. You can then change the gallery number to go to the other ones but frankly in 2009 you shouldn't have to do that to see the other sets. EAch model should have a main page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most of the models are pretty attractive and the photos are decent quality (1333x2000px) but there are no videos. No users forum. No bonus sites or anything. All you've got are 5 links on the side for update year. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Overall if you want nothing but full nude women, then you'd probably like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt;. But if you are the kind that likes the art of stripping, then I'd recommend you stay away.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=29504&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=29504&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:58:52 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_27057</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27057</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-17-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:30am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5722&quot;&gt;lk2fireone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5722&quot;&gt;116&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy, &lt;br /&gt;
glamorous or exotic&lt;br /&gt;
-Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures&lt;br /&gt;
-Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site&lt;br /&gt;
-Easy entrance to site for members&lt;br /&gt;
-Navigation fairly simple and direct&lt;br /&gt;
-Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download&lt;br /&gt;
-Zip file downloading for photosets&lt;br /&gt;
-No download limits&lt;br /&gt;
-Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset)&lt;br /&gt;
-Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site. &lt;br /&gt;
Alinda has 1 photoset at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt;, and an expanded version of the  photoset was posted at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; as model Alina, photoset named
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Pros (continued): &amp;quot;Wonderful Time&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt; has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/amourangels/&quot;&gt;Amour Angels&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
(If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cons:&lt;br /&gt;
-Photosets only. No videos. No live cams.&lt;br /&gt;
-Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few &lt;br /&gt;
photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually).&lt;br /&gt;
-The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Cons(continued):&lt;br /&gt;
-offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers &lt;br /&gt;
than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder.&lt;br /&gt;
-Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man&lt;br /&gt;
-Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around &lt;br /&gt;
since 1997. So why so few pictures listed?&lt;br /&gt;
-No bio data on the models&lt;br /&gt;
-No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes &lt;br /&gt;
a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted.&lt;br /&gt;
-Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line:&lt;br /&gt;
-On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
-Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;Domai&lt;/a&gt;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27057&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=27057&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:30:36 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22914</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22914</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-01-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:13am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4864&quot;&gt;owen&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4864&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Many attractive models&lt;br /&gt;
* High-quality photos and photography&lt;br /&gt;
* Fast&lt;br /&gt;
* Frequent updates&lt;br /&gt;
* No download controls (images are available as zips)&lt;br /&gt;
* Exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
* Unseen models
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Softcore only&lt;br /&gt;
* Some models are less than pretty
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you like softcore photos of pretty young women, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;DOMAI&lt;/a&gt; is a good site for you.  The girls are mostly attractive and are well-shot, with good lighting and artistic angles.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In a perfect world there would be a sister site to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;DOMAI&lt;/a&gt; with hardcore shots of the same models, shot in the same style.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a good site to join once a year and pick up any updated sets.  If you're not interested in hardcore, it's probably a good one to maintain a membership at.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22914&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22914&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 09:13:36 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_440</guid>
		<title>DOMAI Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=440</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/domai.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter DOMAI&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/domai/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-11-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:26pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 86&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=230&quot;&gt;Bacchus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=230&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Young European looking girls posing in natural settings.&lt;br /&gt;
*Content is comprehensive and has tons of models to choose from.&lt;br /&gt;
*Photography is top notch.&lt;br /&gt;
*Availability of zip downloads makes it easy to get entire sets.&lt;br /&gt;
*Updates are often.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					*Some of the poses tend to be boring and not sexy.&lt;br /&gt;
*Too many shaved girls trying to look like twelve year old nubiles and not adult women.&lt;br /&gt;
*Archived content not thumbnailed. 
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A very decent teen site that has a great volume of hot and young beautiful girls posing. The site updates very often and keeps the content fresh. The photography is top notch and they do not silk screen the models adding to their naturalness. 
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=108&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit DOMAI&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=440&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=440&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:26:49 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
