Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/helenvolga/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_1149 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1149 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/helenvolga/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/helenvolga.jpg" alt="Enter Helen Volga" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/helenvolga/"><b>Helen Volga</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 02-01-07&nbsp;&nbsp;10:20am</td> <td> <b>REVIEW = 72</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=429">mudman</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=429">36</a>)<br> <br> <b>Pros:</b><br> -some good photos.<br /> -apparent experience.<br /> -little to never seen before models. <br><br> <b>Cons:</b><br> -not very impressive at all.<br /> -too expensive, by far, for what's offered. <br><br> <b>Bottom Line:</b><br> The feel you get from from <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/helenvolga/">Helen Volga</a>, is another site from someone who's been in the business, who's cashing in on what they've done before they cash out. There's nothing exciting here. True, it's not likely what you've seen (not licenced or such), but you'll only end up seeing a style and approach which you could have seen elsewhere and for a better value. Not worth the price of admission, but certainly not the worse or least responsive site out there. They just have a long way to go before becoming worthwhile. <br><br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10759"><b>Visit Helen Volga</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1149">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1149">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Thu, 01 Feb 2007 10:20:13 PST