<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - 4 Real Amateurs - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/4realamateurs/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7591</guid>
		<title>4 Real Amateurs Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7591</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/4realamateurs/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/4realamateurs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter 4 Real Amateurs&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/4realamateurs/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;4 Real Amateurs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-29-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:29pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=559&quot;&gt;SnowDude&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=559&quot;&gt;214&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Features a real network front page rather than merely directing you to one of the sites&lt;br /&gt;
-Content for all the sites in the network are accessible through a calendar system that also shows you what updates are coming next&lt;br /&gt;
-A few of the sites, especially Anna's, have a lot of content going back several years, so you'll never run out of things to watch&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates are very faithful and offer many features like access to diary entries, show times, and you can even search for content by girl or theme
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Newer material within the last year or so is far superior to what's in the archives, so be prepared for grainy pics and vids before 2006&lt;br /&gt;
-Main network page includes a list of member favorites for pics and vids which is nice, but the titles are truncated (with plenty of room to spare) making it not very helpful&lt;br /&gt;
-Half the sites are barely active (if at all) including one that was only updating for a few months&lt;br /&gt;
-A few of the girls are below &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; standards, which could be a problem for some
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It's not very often that I join any site for a full month that costs over $20, so I have to be pretty impressed with the tour and have high confidence that the book matches the cover. At the time it was a borderline decision, but I say with confidence that it was definitely worth the $25 I paid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
When you enter through the network page you are greeted by a calendar format that was easy to use and even shows a preview of what each update contains. You can view content throughout the network in this manner for about two weeks prior and two weeks ahead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the network is broken down into several sites, when using the netowrk interface you'd hardly know with updates occuring just about every day. You get diaries from the girls on the site, a schedule for cam shows, and some pretty standard bonus feeds. On the downside, many sites havn't been updated in a long time and really shouldn't be considered standalone sites at all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you like glamour models you may find some things to enjoy here, but it is shot with an amateur feel and these are not pornstars. I'd describe them as probably the hottest girl in your class that you drooled over. I found this refreshing, but if you want &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurobabes/&quot;&gt;Eurobabes&lt;/a&gt; this is defintely not for you.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While the network has some issues, I felt the amount of content fit the price quite nicely. I really only had problems with technical stuff like layout and archive media quality, but I'd recommend it to anyone, especially amateur and swinger lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
Soon after my review, I had a couple experiences that made me up my original score. First, I had an issue that initially left me agitated but turned out to be my own damned fault. Even so, the tech folks and the webmaster himself always responded in a professional and timely manner. They took a loss by refunding my money and displayed the best customer service I have ever experienced. Secondly, they responded to one of my critcisms and solved the problem immediately. Definitely worth a look!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10725&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit 4 Real Amateurs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7591&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7591&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 19:29:04 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>