PU - Mano Job - All Activity

RE: Dissapointed.

Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:43:27 PDT

Mano Job (0)

06-03-10 11:43am

COMMENT REPLY by nostromo (12)

To uscue (39):

there are good, sexy scenes, let's be fair, but the movie quality leaves a lot to be desired. those loud colours dazzle me.

Tug jobs minus its frat boy slant would be a better site.

View Thread (2)

RE: Dissapointed.

Mon, 31 May 2010 07:16:36 PDT

Mano Job (0)

05-31-10 07:16am

COMMENT REPLY by uscue (39)

To nostromo (12):

I'm just disappointed in manojob altogether because it's not as good as Tug Jobs. Or at least it wasn't when I was a member well over a year ago. Maybe they've gotten better. Wish it was packaged with SpunkMouth and CumOnMyGlasses as well since they're shot by the same people.

View Thread (2)

Mano Job Comment

Thu, 27 May 2010 10:30:39 PDT

Mano Job (0)

05-27-10 10:30am

COMMENT by nostromo (12)

Dissapointed.

-Most of the videos look reddish to me, like a skin rash. there is a red couch in some scenes that almost made me go blind, not to mention a red carpet that lurks in a few scenes.

-i was going to join through epoch but, unfortunately, my credit card wasn't valid for some obscure reason, it is the first time that that happens to me joining a site through epoch, and i've done that countless times. i called my credit card company and they told me that my card was as valid as ever. Joining through epoch the cost of the membership was of 25.5 euros, having failed to join the site through epoch they redirected me to their backup processor, ccbill, and this time my card was valid, but the price had increased to 29.95 euros. tough luck kid.

-Don't even bother to look for the members entrance in thedicksuckers, it is hidden.

-if you get past the aforementioned the videos are great.

Visit Mano Job - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Denner's Review

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:41:53 PST

Mano Job (0)

02-25-09 08:41am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

We must always get on their case for no zip files and if they have DRM. They will listen to us!

View Thread (4)

RE: TrashMan's Review

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:40:23 PST

Mano Job (0)

02-25-09 08:40am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To TrashMan (103):

I never get tired of POV myself. I hate the stunt dicks (as they call them here) they should have their hands tied behind their backs, mouths taped shut, and a bag over their head as far as I'm concerned! But that's me, and this is a niche site that caters to this. So I see it as a positive.

No zip files is inexusable. Thanks for getting on their case, all these sites need zip files.

The model search here is a mess. They need to upgrade the look of their site.

View Thread (1)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 08 Feb 2009 06:43:06 PST

Mano Job (0)

02-08-09 06:43am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

They have good photos there though. And a good bonus site with "The Dicksuckers".
However, as hard as they try, they still have trouble controlling the males.

View Thread (4)

RE: Denner's Review

Sun, 08 Feb 2009 05:14:53 PST

Mano Job (0)

02-08-09 05:14am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To jd1961 (95):

Yes, bro - it's "nice" without all that pseudo-interview-stuff. And sure, forgot that importend issue about the missing zip - was too busy browsing all those fine videos....

View Thread (4)

RE: Denner's Review

Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:36:46 PST

Mano Job (0)

02-07-09 07:36am

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (227):

Thanks Denner, I joined this site on your recommendation and have not been disappointed. I think you forgot a con though---no zip files. And you're right about the navigation needing a lot of improvement.
But it's a good site.

View Thread (4)

RE: 2 Free K's Review

Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:21:04 PST

Mano Job (0)

11-17-08 08:21am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To 2 Free K (11):

Thanks a million. Great info, and your comments have convinced me to drop $30 and give it a go.

View Thread (5)

RE: 2 Free K's Review

Mon, 17 Nov 2008 01:22:40 PST

Mano Job (0)

11-17-08 01:22am

REVIEW REPLY by 2 Free K (11)

To Monahan (37):

Hey man, sorry it took so long to reply.

To answer those very good questions:
1.) the vids are about 20 minutes each

2.) The trailers are truly appetizers for the videos. The vids are good, using excellent angles to please viewers of different tastes. The focus is on the girl the whole time. A+ on vid quality (shooting, image quality, performance, concept)

3.) The girls do a decent amount of teasing. Not too much (none of the hour of bullshit found in Bang Bus videos), and not too little. And, they change it up from video to video, per the requirements of the scenario. But they all have a good tease intro.

4.) The trailer set is actually a true representation of the membership archive, and you can see EVERY trailer! Talk about testing the product. In fact, I keep tabs on what's new through the trailer page, and they update about once to twice a week.

5.) I experienced no limits on my downloads, and believe me, I got my $$$ worth! No DRM, and fast downloads. The vids were high quality, while still being decently sized (I don't like those 1 GB HD files, it's just a porno vid)

My bad again for being offline for so long, I had forgotten the password to this account. You might've already joined. If not, I highly suggest it, I still check up on their updates weekly.

And the Victoria Vonn videos are HOT! God, her tits are a delight.

View Thread (5)

RE: 2 Free K's Review

Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:16:15 PDT

Mano Job (0)

10-12-08 04:16pm

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To 2 Free K (11):

I found this site today while tracking down all sites with Victoria Vonn content. (She's either out of the biz or is very selective because she's been around since mid 2007 but there isn't much.) Never heard of it until today, so I went to the PU listing and found your review.

I checked out a few of the trailers for some of the babes (Victoria Vonn is on page 18, +/- a page or two) and was very intrigued. (BTW, she also appears in the upper right masthead of the login page as well.) A few questions.

1. How long are the video sequences?
2. The quality of the trailers is quite good. Are the videos all equally good (or better)?
3. There seemed to be a decent front end tease segment in each trailer, but it's hard to tell. Is there a tease before the handjob where the babe shows off her assets in most, if not all, scenes?
4. The trailer sets all indicate the number of videos. Is that an accurate number as far as you know?
5. Is there any download limitation such as DRM or a maximum download limit?

View Thread (5)

RE: 2 Free K's Review

Sun, 14 Sep 2008 12:48:51 PDT

Mano Job (0)

09-14-08 12:48pm

REVIEW REPLY by 2 Free K (11)

To Cybertoad (77):

Yeah, the $30.00 was worth it, because between the two sites you get over 300 exclusive, well-shot, easy to download videos. Before I joined, I had the same fear of getting ripped off, but I was highly impressed.

If you like what you see in the previews, you will be more than pleased. I have several gigs of their stuff from my membership a few months back, and I plan on joining again.

View Thread (5)

RE: 2 Free K's Review

Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:24:38 PDT

Mano Job (0)

09-08-08 10:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To 2 Free K (11):

$30.00 is a tad high was it worth it??
Notice the price wasnt a con?

Thanks

View Thread (5)