PU - Beach Hunters - All Activity

Beach Hunters Comment

Mon, 20 Jun 2011 13:55:38 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

06-20-11 01:55pm

COMMENT by Luiz (0)

Trial info is wrong

The website charges $6.95 for a two day trial, not 7 days as is on the review.

Visit Beach Hunters - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Don't Critique the Webmaster

Fri, 25 Dec 2009 14:07:00 PST

Beach Hunters (0)

12-25-09 02:07pm

COMMENT REPLY by host2626 (0)

To polacrilex (11):

I went to the site a few days ago, the preview area has quite a bit of videos with the HD logo. But there is no sample to download that I could find. There is a post in the "News" section saying that since mid-August they've been focusing on 720+ HD quality. Can any current member comment, did they start doing true HD quality, or, as it says in this comment, it's still up-converted SD clips?

Thanks.

View Thread (5)

RE: Don't Critique the Webmaster

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:21:27 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-13-09 12:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (103)

To polacrilex (11):

I have been to this site before and even before reading this posting I had not intended on ever returning. The point is that everything you say is correct. Their videos do lack quality. Many look like they where shoot with an 8mm video camera.

View Thread (5)

RE: Don't Critique the Webmaster

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:32:04 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-13-09 08:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (37)

To mbaya (344):

Boy is that true!

But better yet, I liked the articulate and fact loaded commentary. Much better than the "your site sucks" crap that is often posted.

View Thread (5)

RE: Don't Critique the Webmaster

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:17:20 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-13-09 06:17am

COMMENT REPLY by mbaya (344)

To polacrilex (11):

You definitely made your point. I agree that your comments are worthwhile, but I also am not surprised they deleted them. PU is an open forum, but websites generally want only positive feedback. Don't even bother telling them your true opinions and valid criticisms.

View Thread (5)

RE: Don't Critique the Webmaster

Mon, 13 Jul 2009 03:22:30 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-13-09 03:22am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To polacrilex (11):

Well, I read it and it makes me avoid the site.

View Thread (5)

Beach Hunters Comment

Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:14:12 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-12-09 09:14pm

COMMENT by polacrilex (11)

Don't Critique the Webmaster

I recently wrote in the forums of this site and my critique was removed in less than 24 hours. Please note that #6 was wrong and I did add a reply to note this. Basically, the video I thought was reposts was video that appeared on another site (jackass-nudebeach.com) so it was not reposted for this site. Here is what I wrote:

Subject: We are not that stupid

While I appreciate the site there are several problems that could be addressed to make the site much better. However, I am guessing that those who own/manage it are soooo rich that they do not care to make more money, or they smoke pot all day and are unmotivated to improve it. In either case here is what needs to be fixed, because for those of use who subscribe and browse the collection from time to time...to put it bluntly...we are not that stupid to notice that...

1. Making 20 videos out of a single 5 minuet clip and then spreading them over a 5 month period doesn't mean that the site has more content. It just means the user has to spend more time downloading a bunch of short clips instead of one. I assume the owners feel this increases the appearance of their content and/or dissuades users from using more bandwidth. In either case it sucks and makes the experience second rate to quality adult sites.

2. Video shot from above that shows shoulders and bald-headed men plain suck and should appear very rarely. If I wanted to look at the tops of naked bald headed men I would find a spot in the ceiling of the men's locker room at the local YMCA.

3. High Definition video is NOT up-converted standard definition video OR compressed HD video made to be smaller in file size so that users use less bandwidth. Just because a video appears in HD aspect ratios doesn't make it HD, and yes we can tell. Come on most of us HAVE HD or are members of sites that offer REAL HD (e.g. ilovethebeach.com). Real HD doesn't take up 9MB for 17 sec clips but about 50+MB.

4. Did I mention how STUPID clips that are less than 1 minuet are...

5. Taking captures of the REAL HD video (which is not made available to subscribers) and then posting it as "pictures" is weak. It is quite obvious that this is what you are doing...

6. You may have 190+ pages of video content (mostly due to the STUPID 17 second clips), but that doesn't mean you need to repost so many videos. Sure most people will get tired of wading through the STUPID 17 second clips, but those of us with memories longer than goldfish are quite aware of how many reposts appear in the course of a year.

To summarize this site could be SUPER cool. It could have the quality that ilovethebeach.com has with its content. But it appears that those who manage this site are cheap and prefer to cut corners and maintain their profit margin instead of increase it. It could be such a great site too which is what makes it a shame...I do wish they read this and consider some of what I have said (even if it was caustic and sarcastic).
reply quote

Visit Beach Hunters - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: polacrilex's Review

Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:06:20 PDT

Beach Hunters (0)

07-12-09 09:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by polacrilex (11)

To polacrilex (11):

It has been over a year since I signed up for this site. As an update I would like to add that the site has not changed much (I recently signed up again). They have made no effort to improve it. In fact, they continue to push movies with HD aspect ratios but not HD resolution as HD video--its not. The picture section continues to be but mere captures of previously released videos. What's funny about that, is the captures are of the REAL HD resolution video that they do not make available for download. Finally, many of the clips continue to be way too short, with some as short as 8 seconds. Basically, they have taken clips that normally would be about 5 minuets and split them up into a bunch of short clips to make it appear they have more content. In reality it is just plain annoying. Also, they have either stolen or bought old footage from jackass-nudebeach.com and split the video up into about 45 2 min clips. In short, the site has not improved its flaws pointed out in my original review. Too many short cuts are being used to limit bandwidth used to increase their profit margin instead of improving the quality of the site to attract long term subscribers. For this reason I would lower my original score to a 72 and say that the BEST nude beach site anywhere is ilovethebeach.com.

View Thread (1)