Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladyboy69/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_60815 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60815 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladyboy69/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ladyboy69.jpg" alt="Enter Ladyboy 69" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladyboy69/"><b>Ladyboy 69</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 05-24-11&nbsp;&nbsp;02:23pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=6510">GCode</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=6510">99</a>)<br> <br> <b>The Clone Thing....</b><br> <br> While I understand this is the original site and <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/shemaleasia/">shemale.asia</a> is the newer site...what I don't understand is why they have the two? While I think <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/shemaleasia/">shemale.asia</a> is sleeker looking, it seems pointless to have the two. They have the exact same content but I remember <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/shemaleasia/">shemale.asia</a> having broken links every once in awhile and the webmaster gave me LB-69 pass, basically meaning <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/shemaleasia/">shemale.asia</a> may be more buggy or not taken care of as much. Maybe someone can help me by explaining why there is the two sites or whatever...<br /> <br /> Anyways, I still think this is THE top site for solo ladyboy models, no other site has such a large difference in models and bring new models to the table in my surfing...if there is another site that can be or will be compared to this, I'd like to know :) <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10230"><b>Visit Ladyboy 69</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=60815">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=60815">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 24 May 2011 14:23:37 PDT pornusers_22775 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22775 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladyboy69/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ladyboy69.jpg" alt="Enter Ladyboy 69" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladyboy69/"><b>Ladyboy 69</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 07-28-08&nbsp;&nbsp;12:55am</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2395">boredsurfer</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2395">0</a>)<br> <br> <b>Good content but Poor Downloading</b><br> <br> Content is good, a lot of it!<br /> <br /> Downloads are VERY slow, and I tried them from several different network locations. <br /> Download limit is 4 gigs a day, which is great, but you will not get anything near 4 gigs a day from this site. Many downloads cut out after half finsihed.<br /> <br /> Content could use more "girl-girl" (ladyboy-ladyboy) but the onyl real problem is the download slowness. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10230"><b>Visit Ladyboy 69</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22775">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22775">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:55:44 PDT