<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Bubble Butt Orgy - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/bubblebuttorgy/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_33666</guid>
		<title>Bubble Butt Orgy Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33666</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bubblebuttorgy/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/bubblebuttorgy.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Bubble Butt Orgy&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bubblebuttorgy/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Bubble Butt Orgy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-09-09&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:42pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;asmith12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;124&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ orgy as advertised&lt;br /&gt;
+ all-black action as advertised (black guys, black girls)&lt;br /&gt;
+ plenty of action, including anal and occasional DP&lt;br /&gt;
++ real emotions (or a very good imitation)&lt;br /&gt;
+ initial conversation adds an additional twist&lt;br /&gt;
+ decent quality pictures&lt;br /&gt;
+- decent lighting and cameraguy work (at least compared to previously reviewed &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/filthfreaks/&quot;&gt;FilthFreaks&lt;/a&gt; sites)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- girls are not models, some are ugly&lt;br /&gt;
-- only 400x300 clips&lt;br /&gt;
-- PRE_CHECKED cross-sales when purchasing&lt;br /&gt;
- cross-sales within member area&lt;br /&gt;
- technical problems with the site&lt;br /&gt;
- no ZIPped downloads&lt;br /&gt;
-- supposedly no updates
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					After disappointment with first two sites of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/filthfreaks/&quot;&gt;FilthFreaks&lt;/a&gt; network (see my reviews of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/blackgangwhitebang/&quot;&gt;BlackGangWhiteBang&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aluckystranger/&quot;&gt;ALuckyStranger&lt;/a&gt;), I didn't really expect much from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bubblebuttorgy/&quot;&gt;BubbleButtOrgy&lt;/a&gt;, and I shall say that I was pleasantly surprised with it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site is about several black girls (4 to 6) and several black guys (about the same number) having fun together. Girls are not models, and some are ugly, but on the plus side they seem to have fun (unlike girls in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/blackgangwhitebang/&quot;&gt;BlackGangWhiteBang&lt;/a&gt;). Every episode starts with some conversation and/or girls showing their assets  (usually assets are substantial), and then it moves towards the all-out orgy, which usually includes some anal, and sometimes includes DP.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Site has about 22 episodes, each consisting of 12-20 clips 5 minutes each. This is where lack of ZIP-ped downloads kicks in, as downloading 20 clips one by one is not fun. Unlike &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/blackgangwhitebang/&quot;&gt;BlackGangWhiteBang&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aluckystranger/&quot;&gt;ALuckyStranger&lt;/a&gt;, pictures are not screencaps, but are from separate photoshoot, and are of decent size (varies, but can be as much as 2900 width). Updates are not dated and most likely are absent. As with the other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/filthfreaks/&quot;&gt;FilthFreaks&lt;/a&gt; sites, I've experienced a few &amp;quot;Cannot find server&amp;quot; errors.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: not bad content, provided that you're not scared by mediocre girls (who on the plus side can have fun on camera). Unfortunately, lack of updates and minor glitches here and there make this site not so interesting, but if &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/filthfreaks/&quot;&gt;FilthFreaks&lt;/a&gt; have more sites of similar quality (and NOT like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/blackgangwhitebang/&quot;&gt;BlackGangWhiteBang&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aluckystranger/&quot;&gt;ALuckyStranger&lt;/a&gt;), the network might be worth the price (again, if you're not scared away by mediocre girls).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10217&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Bubble Butt Orgy&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=33666&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=33666&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:42:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
