Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/review/myadiamond/ Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_7792 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7792 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/myadiamond/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/myadiamond.jpg" alt="Enter Mya Diamond" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/myadiamond/"><b>Mya Diamond</b></a> (5)<br> <br> 09-04-07&nbsp;&nbsp;05:16pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940">Drooler</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940">156</a>)<br> <br> <b>Well I ... feel like I been here before</b><br> <br> Was browsing around the &quot;latest&quot; at <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/myadiamond/">Mya Diamond</a> and got a spell of d&eacute;j&agrave; v&uuml;. In August '07, there's gallery of <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/loracraft/">Lora Craft</a> called &quot;Deep Pleasure,&quot; but I'd already gotten it from this same site in early 2006. I'd filed it as &quot;Deep Pleasure&quot; too. <br /> <br /> Then I noticed: this site started in Sept. 2005, but now the archives begin in Feb. 2006.<br /> <br /> Does this recycling of content really matter, though? For some folks, I'm sure it doesn't. Yet, anyway. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10132"><b>Visit Mya Diamond</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7792">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7792">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:16:28 PDT