<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Real Rookies - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/review/realrookies/</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5652</guid>
		<title>Real Rookies Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5652</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realrookies/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realrookies.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Real Rookies&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realrookies/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Real Rookies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-04-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;apoctom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;145&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Girls appear to be amateurs and are young and attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
- Scenes appear to be original and exclusive.&lt;br /&gt;
- Vid quality is very good (up to 2100k wmv)&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of vid options: wmv, mpg, iPod, mov&lt;br /&gt;
- Access to PervNetwork (20+ sites)&lt;br /&gt;
- Fast download speeds and compatible with download managers.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Irregular updates. Last update was 6/2.&lt;br /&gt;
- Only 24 movies.&lt;br /&gt;
- Some links are broken. Ex: one of the top rated videos on the home page links to a page that doesn't include the model's video. After browsing all pages, this model is nowhere on the site.&lt;br /&gt;
- Quite a few ads on the member homepage add clutter.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is a little small to justify spending $30 a month for a subscription. While it seems content may be added to the site, the site doesn't appear to be growing right now. Broken links and ads don't help the site's rating, either.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, these girls appear to be true amateurs. I don't think that I've seen any of them on any other website. Additionally, about half of the scenes are solo girl and half include a guy/girl at the end, so there's a broader appeal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In spite of its small size, this is one of the better sites on the PervNetwork due to its unique, exclusive scenes and attractive ladies. However, because it is so small, I can't rate it very high. This is definitely a bonus site for this network and should only be joined in that circumstance.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10040&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Real Rookies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5652&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5652&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jul 2007 22:22:05 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>