PU - Extreme - New Reviews

Funny BDSM Review

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:22:43 PST

Funny BDSM (2)

01-28-08 07:22am

REVIEW = 80 by asmith12 (86)

Pros:
+ really funny stories (for not "Real BDSM" episodes)
+ really good setups (costumes and so on)
+ recent videos are of good quality (2MBit/s WMV)
+ lots of episodes
+ dated updates once a week

Cons:
- "Real BDSM" stories have strong "abusing" context
- outrageous price
- older videos are RealPlayer-only
- no "all episode" download
- pics are vidcaps only

Bottom Line:
FunnyBDSM leaves a lot of mixed feelings. First of all, content can be divided into two distinct categories: episodes labeled "Real BDSM" and episodes not labeled as such. "Real BDSM" isn't something really special, but quite usual (and annoying for me) BDSM movies with strong "abuse women" theme. Other episodes (not labeled as "Real BDSM") are mostly fun: while "abuse" theme is also present there, but it's usually so grotesque that neither myself nor models can take it serious; there is no real BDSM there too and it's pretty obvious (yes, they show marks on bodies but they're fake). "Court of Justice" and "Heil Dickler" series are prominent examples of episodes I consider funny. In all the episodes (both "Real BDSM" and not "Real BDSM" ones) there is usually some sex action in addition to BDSM (up to occasional anal).

On technical side: site is updated weekly, and each new episode consists of 2-4 about-5-minute clips. Quality of recent clips is very good (2MBit/s WMV + some RealPlayer), but older ones are RealPlayer-only and aren't as crisp.

Bottom line: if leaving outrageous price out of consideration, clips not marked as "Real BDSM" could be quite interesting for a change; unfortunately, most of recent clips are "Real BDSM". "Real BDSM" clips are about "abuse women" theme rather than "Safe, Sane and Consensual" BDSM (though a few most recent clips seem to migrate in that direction), with medium intensity, including sex.

Visit Funny BDSM - View Replies - Add Reply

RT Bondage Review

Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:09:04 PST

RT Bondage (1)

11-08-07 01:09pm

REVIEW = 70 by KodiakCS (7)

Pros:
Exclusive content
Original "fantasies"
Some nice looking eurogirls
Preview area with photos every scene

Cons:
Bad video quality (Real format)
No real Bondage in most cases
Updates are not that regular
Poor site design

Bottom Line:
This site seems to be the trash receptor for funny bdsm (?!), it contains mainly the same kind of forced-sex-fantasy scenes with some rather soft bondage (tied up girls, taped mouths...) but in worse video quality (lower resolution, no WMV etc. so far) and with less creativity and enthusiasm.
Some of the older scenes in very bad video quality seem to be of russian origin and contain rape fantasies...
However the overall sex-level is rather tame, there's some anal sex and deep throating and an occasional peeing event.
The update frequency currently seems to be 1/week but the site is up for years and does not contain that many scenes (around 60-80).

Bottom line:
I don't really know what's the deal here, the bigger brother "funny bdsm" seems to receive more and better input in better quality. Maybe rtbondage is worth joining if you liked this site very much and want to get "all the rest".
Unless this is the case, I think you should spend your 30$ elsewhere...

Visit RT Bondage - View Replies - Add Reply

Funny BDSM Review

Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:52:37 PST

Funny BDSM (2)

11-04-07 01:52pm

REVIEW = 80 by KodiakCS (7)

Pros:
Exclusive content
Original and (crazy) ideas
Some very hot eurogirls
Some of the settings are in fact quite funny
Some well made fetish stuff

Cons:
Most scenes seem a little "overacted", bondage is often played
Older vids are delivered in VERY bad quality (crappy real format)
BDSM Fans may miss real bondage
No clear update schedule

Bottom Line:
The exclusive content and lots of ideas make this site fun and interesting. Some girls seem "into it" while most simply act.
Many will deem the fake violence disgusting (especially in the older vids you'll find knock outs, blood) - So beware !
The preview area shows small vidcap-collages of each scene, so you may check it out and see if you like the content.

All in all this site deserves a little more attention than previously given by TBP.
There are some very hot girls doing nasty stuff. Older videos seem more "authentic" but lack quality, newer ones are more glamorous and main stream but are of much better quality.

Visit Funny BDSM - View Replies - Add Reply

Riot Whores Review

Fri, 28 Sep 2007 20:12:16 PDT

Riot Whores (1)

09-28-07 08:12pm

REVIEW = 81 by SnowDude (214)

Pros:
-The site offers very unique content unlike anything I have ever seen before; some of the vids actually have a continuing storyline!
-Most of the videos are of decent video quality, with most running about 1000k accompanied by a large number of vidcaps
-The site includes a number of behind the scenes features that really brings something extra to the site and are actually worth watching
-You get full access to the Meatmembers network with your membership, all for under $30 a month

Cons:
-All videos on the site are cut into segments which really screwed up the mood and was sloppily edited, leaving out noticable amounts of footage
-Some (perhaps many) will find the scenes extremely rough, even offensive, which is saying a lot since we're already talking about hardcore porn
-The site hasn't updated in over a year with no updates in sight and has no high res photo shoots
-The price is steep when considering the site by itself with only 18 vids running an average of 30 mins each

Bottom Line:
This is the third site I've reviewed on the Meatmembers network and I can say right off the bat that it is definitely my favorite so far. It's rough, sometimes shockingly so, but if you want something unique and more than a bit extreme you should keep reading. If not, I'd suggest stopping now.

As with another site on the network, one of the first things that caught my attention was the fact that the camera operator is a woman (named Mason) which is a definite departure from most male camera guys who don't ever seem to shut up. I thought it made for a different style of camera work that I found enoyable and many of the vids are a series of episodes with an actual plot!

Although the episodes are all dated, it's clear that the site hasn't been updated in a while with no new vids in sight. On the plus side, in addition to the episodes there are a number of "behind the scenes" vids that actually add something to the site. It reveals that the women who appear in the vids actually enjoy the rough play, or at least that's what they say.

There are a lot of people that I think would be turned off if not disgusted by the vids and you have to go into the site knowing that in advance. That said, if you are looking for something radically different I'd recommend giving it a try. It's not just male domination as it switches quite often with both sexes being in control. By itself the price is definitely too steep, although as part of the larger network I think it's a good deal.

Visit Riot Whores - View Replies - Add Reply

Meat Holes Review

Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:14:18 PDT

Meat Holes (1)

09-15-07 10:14am

REVIEW = 79 by SnowDude (214)

Pros:
-All videos are available in MPEG or WMV format and can be streamed or downloaded easily
-If you enjoy rough anal content with ass licking and "mindgames" you will be right at home, although some of the domination is less than authentic for true fetishists
-Video quality, even for the older content, is pretty good and watchable
-Along with your membership you get over 40 additional sites all for under $30 a month which is a good value for what you pay, at least in terms of quantity

Cons:
-Vids are only available in sections and can't be streamed or downloaded in one large chunk
-The girls are treated like crap (although many hold their own and are ultimately in control) which certainly won't appeal to many
-The scenes are very formulaic by following the same pattern every time and it's almost like you're watching an unedited porn film
-Even the "newest" content is two years old and none of the episodes are dated, so it's not clear if the site updates regularly

Bottom Line:
This is the first site that I have reviewed for the Meatholes network and probably the best known. While I am not usually one who enjoys rough sex, I must confess that it does "do it for me" when I am in the mood and if it is done well. While there are some pluses, overall I don't think proper execution can be a label given to this site.

As noted in a comment, the navigation isn't that great, although I found it to be pretty standard for most networks. The newer content has a consistent organization, but the further back you go the more confusing it gets. Some episodes had preview pictures missing along with some of the scenes, which I found unforgivable without an explanation.

The action itself is acceptable for most, but I'm sure a true lover of this genre would be less than thrilled. The director asks the girl questions throughout and is, by his own admission, an asshole. The intent is verbal humiliation, but it's clear that the girl calls the shots in the end.

Overall, I found that the site didn't really live up to the hype and could be vastly improved with very little effort. The vids are processed in a very sloppy way with a minute or more cut out between sections. There are pictures with some of the episodes (but not all) which are merely vidcaps, even though I saw someone taking actual digital shots during the sessions. You do get full network access with your membership all for less than $30, but I'm less than impressed and definitely won't renew.

Visit Meat Holes - View Replies - Add Reply

Sweet Members Review

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 07:43:39 PDT

Sweet Members (1)

04-16-07 07:43am

REVIEW = 83 by nygiants03 (156)

Pros:
- some of the most hardcore content on the net
- great bdsm videos ( very real and painful)
- lots and lots of content
- frequent updates
- Steve Sweet is HARDCORE
- videos are good quality (not great however)

Cons:
- A bit pricey 34.95 for a month
- comes with some filler sites that are bad
- lots of the same models on different sites
- many unattractive models
- pictures are not great quality

Bottom Line:
-If you want a site that has almost every fetish you can think of and are willing to pay the high cost , its worth it.
- You have everything from piss drinking, to needle play, hardcore gagging, shit eating, butt cams, fisting,to bukkake.
-Sadoslaves is probably one of the most intense bdsm and torture sites on the whole net, the screams of the girls and the environment is creepy but somehow erotic.
- the filler sites are abbraxa porn, angels of porn, and athens girls - they are rather poor
- If you like softcore porn, and a site that films girls with respect this is not it. Steve Sweet treats the girls likes garbage.
p.s. check out Janessa and Alexandria

Visit Sweet Members - View Replies - Add Reply

The Pain Files Review

Fri, 23 Mar 2007 16:53:51 PDT

The Pain Files (1)

03-23-07 04:53pm

REVIEW = 76 by cerebral (30)

Pros:
An extreme site that includes whippings, piercing, spankings, hot wax and electric shock. Two or three of their models are quite attractive, particularly Ange Venus. Quality of current episodes is good and downloads come through well, if a bit slow. Pictures, especially newer ones are sharp and clear.

Cons:
Navigating this site is clumsy, and the way the films are clipped leaves much to be desired. Compressing some of the video clips would be desirable. Many of the pictures, especially newer ones suffer from "red eye." See pictures of Ange Venus. Updates are slow. Several of the models are scaggy, to say the least.

Bottom Line:
An interesting place to explore for anyone interested in extreme forms of BDSM. However, there are better sites, and a few for less money. This site could use better looking models. And their videos could stand to be reduced from 13 to 14 clips to say 5 or 6.

Visit The Pain Files - View Replies - Add Reply