PU - High Def - New Reviews

New Solos Review

Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:56:37 PDT

New Solos (1)

06-03-08 02:56pm

REVIEW = 90 by Zauber (1)

Pros:
Review has to be for the whole network which is about 50% solo girl and 50% h/c and g/g or so. This is only about the solo girl content which is found across the sites. Features mostly lovely girls from the US, not just the skinniest ones, stripping and using toys. Some of the girls are presumably of asian or latin origin but just as pretty. Some 100 or so lovely solo girl videos on the network. Impeccable video quality.

Cons:
The sites use a two camera system where the girl often seems to look into the other camera. Something you could improve upon if you read this.

Bottom Line:
Updates with solo girl video content about 4 days a week I would estimate and another 4 days per week for B/G content. Some girls are pornstars, but more of them never seen to me. One of the best sites for solo girl toy videos, I would think.

Visit New Solos - View Replies - Add Reply

Lucky Lesbians Review

Sat, 08 Mar 2008 10:33:56 PST

Lucky Lesbians (1)

03-08-08 10:33am

REVIEW = 69 by Davit (46)

Pros:
-As it says on the tin - lesbian content
-Bonus sites
-No DRM

Cons:
-Claims to be Hi-Def, but in fact, the quality is pretty average. They have been re-sampled up to 1280x720 to make HD-sized files, which puts pressure on the processor, but have clearly come from a lower res source and are not sharp, and do not have natural or vibrant colour. Bit of a con really.
-Movies have a horrible great logo spanning the full left-to-right across the bottom of the screen
-As of November 07, less than 20 full lesbo movies (each split into 2 halves)
-Bonus sites not very good. Includes 'Slutty Squirters' which is basically girls screaming their heads off while taking a piss, pretending they're cumming. Yeah right. And 'Anal Hell' - girls sticking a dildo up their assholes for 20 minutes - and pretending they're cumming.
-Annoying music in most of the movies
-Rubbish camera work and lighting
-Average pic sets - not very interesting, and 682x1024 so not very sharp either

Bottom Line:
I really wasn't at all impressed with this site. The tour pages make it look so great, with shots of gorgeous girls in apparently Hi-Def lesbian movies.

Don't believe it. The movies are not that sharp at all. They're easily DVD-quality (the lower end of DVD quality) but no way are they HD. But they've been up-sampled into HD formats, so they have large files and put an HD-type strain on your PC's processor without the benefit of true HD images. I have similar length movies of less than half the file size of these, that look twice as good in terms of picture quality.

And the action is completely fake and routine looking. The girls are just doing their job for the pay cheque, getting out the dildos and screaming their way through 20-30 minutes of porn-by-numbers. I think they'd be much happier working down the supermarket than doing this, by the looks of some of them. They're clearly not passionate about doing this. Or maybe they're suffering from bad direction.

I'm glad I kept the movies and pics on my hard drive so I could review them for this review. But I will be deleting them shortly.

There are far better sites out there than this for your money, that don't waste your disk space with 'pseudo-HD' movies.

Not recommended.

Visit Lucky Lesbians - View Replies - Add Reply

Upperclass Video Review

Sat, 29 Dec 2007 08:10:03 PST

Upperclass Video (0)

12-29-07 08:10am

REVIEW = 86 by DaboGirls4eva (4)

Pros:
Very easy navigation
Exclusive content
Excellent video quality
Fast downloads
Stars like Ava Rose, Cassie Young, and Roxy Jezel
Split screen video

The split screen feature basically improves on what Vivid tried to do in their films with multiple angles; The producers split the video down the middle, featuring two different angles of the same action on the left and right side. The split screen comes and goes, but isn't noticeable or annoying. It's a great idea after you see it done.

Cons:
Updates have no date or time stamp so it's difficult to determine the frequency of new content being added, if at all.

Bottom Line:
Upperclassvideo.com currently has 31 exclusive HD videos all featuring hardcore b-g action. They also have 8 HD lesbian scenes. In addition to these videos they have 29 standard definition scenes. That's 68 scenes total. Most all of the videos can be downloaded in a single file, although a handful still are in multiple segments which are being transitioned to single file downloads (the segments are still available though if you need that). Most HD downloads will be about 1 gigabyte per file/scene. All of the vids seem to be around the standard 30 minutes long.

On the technical side the HD scenes are all at 1280x720, targeted around 4 Mbit/sec on a variable bitrate. Looking at the rate, it goes from 3.3 Mbit/sec to 5 Mbit/sec, centering around 4.3 to 4.5 Mbit/sec. This is about 50% of true 1280x720 which is somewhere around 8 Mbit/sec. The video wrapper is avi.

If you're interested in pictures this site has that as well. The pics are in 1920x1080 format. The site also has screenshots of their exclusive scenes.

Overall this is a very easy to use and enjoyable site. There is a helpful news section which is a log of site updates and also a help page if you need help playing the HD footage. I recommend using VLC player. The videos are hot, and in HD they are even better. Check it out!

Visit Upperclass Video - View Replies - Add Reply

LSG Models Review

Thu, 27 Dec 2007 13:15:27 PST

LSG Models (4)

12-27-07 01:15pm

REVIEW = 80 by IKnoPorn (20)

Pros:
* Attractive European models, most of which I have never seen before
* Exclusive content
* High quality videos in a variety of formats
* Hot solo and lesbian content
* Updates daily
* More explicit content labelled with yellow "LSG Extreme", although tends to be more softcore
* VIP area with behind the scenes vids, extra photos
* Bargain pricing for members who stay with the site - $59.99 per year

Cons:
* Some high def vids have digitizing problems
* Music in some vids
* Not alot of content (about 1 year's worth)
* Small, repetitive photo galleries
* VIP area costs extra (unless you join by the end of this year)

Bottom Line:
This site offers a different take on glamour model content. The models are attractive and younger, in the 18-22 year old range. They wear some but not too much makeup. There are no fake breasts, the models appear very natural and comfortable. Many of the names/faces are unknown, which gives the site an amateur feel, although East European favorite Nella is here in a few vids.

The vids are offered in a variety of resolutions for download, and they can be streamed at a lower resolution so you can preview first. They offer HD resolutions of 480p and 720p. However, I had trouble with some of the 720p vids, they were grainy with digital artifacting issues, a sign of remastering problems. I really don't think it's my computer, since I can play other HD content just fine. Nonetheless, this was not a major issue, I stuck to the 480p vids which still look great (even at fullscreen), are quicker to download, and take up less space.

The site often plays up an artistic angle, with piano and other music in the vids. Sometimes this works, but I'd prefer if they offered an option with no music. In any case you can always hear the models. The photosets are small and more artistic than arousing, I stuck to the vids.

Lastly, there is not alot of content, but definitely some high quality solo and very hot lesbian vids. More explicit content is clearly labelled. If you like glamour content it's a good join for a month at $24.95, although I'd skip the extra $10 charge for VIP content

Visit LSG Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Cougars In Heat Review

Fri, 07 Dec 2007 03:10:36 PST

Cougars In Heat (2)

12-07-07 03:10am

REVIEW = 80 by Toadsith (48)

Pros:
*Hi-Res video (1280 x 720)
*Complete Video Downloads (~500MB) and Clips
*No DRM
*50+ Exclusive Videos (57 at review)
*Matching Photosets w/ Zip Downloads for Newer Videos
*Models pushing 40 years old (not just past 30) - some past 40!
*Videos feature back stories
*Good lighting, many positions, almost always end in facials
*Bonus streaming DVD content (up to 2MB/s) by Adult Rental VOD

Cons:
*No Search Engine
*Videos use too much compression (visible dithering)
*Weekly Updates
*AdultFriendFinder Ads
*Most models have breast implants
*Mediocre lighting on videos prior to April, 2007

Bottom Line:
CougarsInHeat.com is the first high-quality MILF site that features true mature women � most of the women are closer to 40 than 30 � and almost all play the experienced older woman role convincingly. The site�s emphasis on the Cougar stereotype makes it a better MILF site than many of the more famous sites out there.

Almost all of the models have breast implants unfortunately, but strangely it fits with the characters well. Each video has a definite back story that the actors stay true to throughout each scene. The play-acting really set this site apart from the rest � enhancing the Cougar / MILF fantasy that the site is presenting.

The video is indeed high quality � but the compression is a little too high, so high action parts of the video show significant dithering and blocky-ness. The newer videos also have matching photos that feature both soft-core and hard-core sets downloadable as Zips as well as video caps for easy previewing of the video.

The site literally consists of one long page featuring a photo of each model as she appears in each video � this makes navigation slightly daunting, but once you are on the video�s own page it is extremely well organized. However the AdultFriendFinder ads are prevalent throughout the site and frankly an annoying presence on a pay site.

Due to the high quality content and the slow update rate - I recommend subscribing once a year for a month. Get the new content, cancel and then return again next year.

Visit Cougars In Heat - View Replies - Add Reply

LSG Models Review

Thu, 29 Nov 2007 01:08:04 PST

LSG Models (4)

11-29-07 01:08am

REVIEW = 81 by roadie (6)

Pros:
Recent photos are of high quality up to 3000 pixels and well referenced with model name and set number.
Each photo set is around 40 photos which isn't the largest of files but most files include some nice close up with emphasis recently appearing to be quality not quantity but if thats truely the case a bump to 4000pixles would be nice.
Excellent search facility which includes ability to search by model name, age, nationality, hair colour, shaved and several other options.
Many sexy models

Cons:
Older photo sets are numbered from 001 to last photo number. This of course means the next set you look at is numbered identically and when you save the photo you get the old "this file already exists do you wish to replace it" message when in fact it is a different photo. This problem has been corrected in the newer sets as mentioned above but it really is an annoying and very basic problem that could easily have been avoided.
The 2 Watermarks per photo is un-necessary videos slightly grainy.

Bottom Line:
Just a bit slightly expensive for a site that is still growing and has still a small number of models and photo sets.
There are obvious attempts to improve the site such as changing the photo set numbering and higher quality photos.
I think it is still over rated when listed as excellent and would personally rate it very good with the potential to be an excellent site in about 6 months or so once the site grows and there is a bigger choice. That said there is already some very sexy models here and I will probably be back sometime in the future to see how it has grown.

Visit LSG Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Anal Hell Review

Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:02:55 PDT

Anal Hell (0)

08-13-07 07:02pm

REVIEW = 70 by BenD (1)

Pros:
- High Resolution Videos
- Good Range of Content if you count the 7 other HD sites included as well as some other sites.

Cons:
- The watermarks on the vids are annoying
- Slow Downloads (40-80kbs on average)
- Downloads often fail halfway through (not my connection before you ask)

Bottom Line:
Overall once the videos are on my hard drive i am happy but untill then the download issues are very frustrating. I dont think the site quite deserves its asking price but HD videos are nice and the models are great so you might wanna check it out.

Visit Anal Hell - View Replies - Add Reply

LSG Models Review

Mon, 06 Aug 2007 08:44:22 PDT

LSG Models (4)

08-06-07 08:44am

REVIEW = 85 by Denner (146)

Pros:
First of all: Great looking videos of solo girls - especially for a girl-video-freak.
Sexy teen girls, mostly european/east european.

Good price for what you get.

I'm not sure about updates at this early stage, but the amount has rissen lately - it seems. After checking out the site earlier this year.

Videos are generally better than photos - the atmosphere/color in the videos are great.

Cons:
It's quite a newer site, so the amount of stuff here is still average, but ok for the price.

I agree with ofter PU-users that the way they number the photos in zips or confusing and, yeah, not good. And watermarks two places in a photo is nonsens.

Download speed needs work.

Videos are split up in 2 og 3 files which makes the amout seem larger - and there is no full download for a whole scene. Thats the most irritating about this site. I tried to do a movie-join - but could not.

Bottom Line:
I'll probably take some heat again for too high score to this site.
But folks, I love this site just after browsing for a day.
Here are some extremely cute and sexy teens.

Their videos are top. Something in between Teen Dreams, Nubiles and European Glamour Girls - BUT this LSG-site has something special about their girl-videos.

If you try to brows the preview you'll see some fascinating young and slim teens - and some I've not seen anywhere else, like Mia, Juliet and Zoe - not in this great quality of video anyway.

Most videos come in WMV, Quicktime and MPG - and there is also a small file for preview. Average size of video files is 100 MB. Quality is just great.

If these guys keep up the standard and keep the updates comming, well I think. I'll be back and back again.
But please, make the movie-files in whole scenes too!

Follow-Up:
Interaction/feedback sucks - se comment.
I downgrade in spite of some extremely fine girls on video.

Visit LSG Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Snatches Review

Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:20:43 PDT

Snatches (2)

07-26-07 01:20pm

REVIEW = 75 by kman1982 (11)

Pros:
+ The best feature this site has to offer is the quality of the high def videos. They are presented in 4000kbps and even an ultra high def 8000kbps formats, which really do look the bees knees
+ Gorgeous European models playing with toys and often whipped cream, with lots of close up shots of their perfect bodies
+ Excellent quality hi res picture galleries

Cons:
- One of the biggest disapointments for me was the extreme lack of updates! - if any! In fact i think site updates have not occured since last year.
- There is also a distinct lack of content on the site, initially it looks as if there are lots of videos on offer but on a closer inspection only about half of those are presented in hd, that is around 15-20 scenes! Not good when you've just shelled out $30 for a monthly subscription
- Each part of each scene has to be downloaded individually

Bottom Line:
I look at snatches.com as being initially a good site but a site that has not moved forwards, either the site owners have invested money into other paysites or they are just happy to sit back and let punters spend money on a subscription to the site knowing that there won't be any updates.

The site is fairly easy to navigate with all videos in one archive and theres no need for search options as there aren't enough videos on the site to warrant it. Some aspects of design of the site could be made more clear but it's only minor things.

The quality of what is on there is very impressive, but it's a shame there isn't more of it. I quite happily cancelled my subscription after just one month, it wouldn't take long to get the best content from the site in this time and then leave because there will be no updates!

I also experienced slow transfers and internet activity whilst using the site which was sometimes frustrating, whether the site has been moved to a cheaper, slower server I don't know but it wouldn't surprise me.

Overall the bad points far out way the good, but this site could have been so much more with an increased effort in time and money. If the site had regular updates and a larger archive of content then I would definetly have rated this site 85-90 easily, but because of these problems it gets a much lower score.

Visit Snatches - View Replies - Add Reply

New Solos Review

Mon, 23 Jul 2007 13:41:29 PDT

New Solos (1)

07-23-07 01:41pm

REVIEW = 79 by kman1982 (11)

Pros:
+ Some recognisable faces from the adult industry such as Satvia Rose, Jenna Presley, Sascha Knox, Arianna Jollee etc
+ Good High definition content although not necessarily the best out there
+ Access to various other bonus sites, including busty solos and anal hell
+ Reasonable subscription price

Cons:
- The site is lacking in content compared to some other sites offering hd videos of a similar genre such as infocus girls, only cuties etc
- Search feature is poor but not really an issue just yet as there are not too many videos on there just yet
- Better Hd content is available out there
- Limited video format download options

Bottom Line:
If you are looking for recognisable porn star faces playing with their pussy's with toys in hd then you will like this site, but there is not enough quality content to keep the avid porn enthusiast interested over a long period. Updates happen on a weekly basis and as you also get access to several other hd sister sites there is enough there to grab your interest.

So new solos has it's good and bad points but if they sorted out a few things it could be a top quality site but is still worth a quick check.

Visit New Solos - View Replies - Add Reply

Cougars In Heat Review

Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:34:46 PDT

Cougars In Heat (2)

07-22-07 02:34pm

REVIEW = 84 by kman1982 (11)

Pros:
+ Hardcore scenes featuring some well known mature ladies in the business including Nina Hartley, Daryl Hannah, Bailey O'dare and Ava Devine.
+ Videos are presented in a variety of different formats up to 2000k WMV high def, ipod formats are also available, you can even download individual parts of each secene if you prefer. They are available as downloads or streaming and do not have DRM restrictions
+ The site is clean and easy to navigate and updates occur on a weekly bassis.

Cons:
- Updates can take a while to appear, sometimes longer than the time they say
- Only around 35-40 videos online at the moment
- Images are not great quality

Bottom Line:
One of the best things this site offers is the Hd video, there aren't too many mature paysites out there offering true hd quality video, added with that a great selection of gorgeous cougars ready to devour any fresh meat that comes their way and we're onto a winner. Another feature to note is with each scene comes a scenario, whether it be a friends mother, a gardener etc. which does add something to each scene, rather than 'hello, how are you - lets have sex' type scene.

Overall though cougars in is an excellent mature site offering hd video and fairly recent updates, if it wasn' t for the actual lack of content I would have rated this site much higher.

Visit Cougars In Heat - View Replies - Add Reply

Chicks Love Chicks Review

Thu, 21 Jun 2007 05:43:21 PDT

Chicks Love Chicks (1)

06-21-07 05:43am

REVIEW = 60 by Cenobite75 (6)

Pros:
- all movies from the main site are downloadable in full HD quality (1280*720)
- Superb quality
- Relatively easy navigation
- Nice design

Cons:
- Very pricy
- Only 7 movies and 7 photosets on the main site
- Bonus movies are of a lower quality
- no update schedule
- No zipfiles for pictures

Bottom Line:
I was very (VERY!!!) disappointed when I joined this site. Can't help but to feel cheated.

1. When you click the "instant access" button, you get the impression that you will have access to the entire network. It didn't matter to me, because I was only interested in lesbian HD content, but others will get the same impression and be thoroughly disappointed. You can only download 6 movies/photosets from each site in the network, you can't actually enter the sites (your login won't work).

2. 7 movies with corresponding photosets in NOT worth 30$. The network tried to make up for this by allowing you to download a few movies from other sites in the network, but these are of course a different niche. I joined this site because I wanted HD lesbian content, not shemales and mature women. You also have the option to download bonus movies, but these are lower quality and from what I can see, clips from various DVD releases.

3. There is no apparent update schedule, which means updates could happen in a matter of days/weeks and who knows? even months.

To be fair, the site would be totally awesome if it had more content. The quality IS really good, but 7 movies is just silly. Save your money and take a look at the site again in a few months or so, might be worth it then.

/Membership cancelled

Visit Chicks Love Chicks - View Replies - Add Reply

LSG Models Review

Sun, 13 May 2007 06:44:00 PDT

LSG Models (4)

05-13-07 06:44am

REVIEW = 78 by Drooler (156)

Pros:
+exclusive content of familiar hot Euro babes (Demi, Marina/Euphrat, Suzie Carina, Hana Slavikova, etc.)
+everyday updates: a gallery one day, a vid the next
+pic sizes at 1000, 1500, and 2000px, singly or in zips
+HQ vid sizes 1280x720 or 854x480 (each in both WMV and Quicktime; some go to 1920x1080!); plus mpeg (512x288) and ipod (320x180)
+monthly membership price of $19.99
+nice public preview area

Cons:
-just 5 ½ months of content buildup; 44 models
-only vids or pics of some models
-pics per gallery varies (some are brief)
-slow downloads (>120mbps for vids, broadband connection)
-confusing login: click �members enter here� and it looks like the public area -- but everything is accessible.
-for each model, galleries named by shoot location, and it�s erratic. Example: Normandy 2, Prague 2, Normandy 1, Prague 3, etc.
-large watermarks in two corners of pics

Bottom Line:
This is a purely softcore site with some lez stuff and some applications coming out of the phallic toolkit.

The photos are very good quality, but I thought some lacked enough richness in color. I�d also like to see more personality coming out of the models more often. Both factors together sent me into boredom too many times.

But at least LSG seems conscious of its watermarks; I never saw any overlaid on a model�s image in pics. They could make them smaller, though. (If Hana spread her buns more, could she make them shrink?)

The poor organization of individual model galleries is distracting; it means that the user has to keep mental track of things. Sure, I�m being petty, but frankly there�s no good excuse for it, either. It would be very simple for LSG Models to fix this problem and organize their content better so that the user can concentrate on more important things, like Bente�s soft and yielding behind.

I�ve seen three vids in large dimensions, and the image quality is excellent � better than the pics.

As TBP�s common refrain goes, the site needs time to grow. Because it grows equally in pics and vids, whether you lean more towards one or the other, it�s a slow but fair and even process. It�s pretty easy to predict that six months from now, it will be twice as good, and I�d probably rate the site in the 80s.

Final suggestion: with the vid sizes so high, why not crank those pics up to 3-4000px?

Visit LSG Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen HDV Review

Fri, 27 Apr 2007 06:14:28 PDT

Teen HDV (1)

04-27-07 06:14am

REVIEW = 79 by OneMan (16)

Pros:
Good quality vids - what there are of them.

Photos are ok. Nice girls.

Cons:
Some of the girls advertised on the Main Page cannot be found in the videos section once you go through the "members entrance".

General navigation is atrocious. You really need to suss-out the indexing system and type in consecutive numbers in the url bar to find the "bio's" which show the links to the 16 girls that do have videos - which should not really be necessary !

And still - no sign of the one's I was interested in though !

Bottom Line:
OK - if you are hooked on HiDef - otherwise, better value and variety elsewhere.

Wrote 3 emails to complain - no answer to any.

No updates - so - be warned.

Visit Teen HDV - View Replies - Add Reply

HD Solo Girls Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:48:48 PDT

HD Solo Girls (1)

04-09-07 01:48pm

REVIEW = 79 by DivBZero (13)

Pros:
There is a reasonable range of high-def video content here. Basically it gives what it says on the tin. The models are sweet and the interaction with the female interviewer is passable although the 'accent' makes the whole thing cuter. As far as I can tell the videos are exclusive. Note that only the ones starting SB are full resolution.

Cons:
The HD videos are fairly compressed at around 150-250Mb each. The colours are very heavy at the red end of the spectrum and this detracts from the overall presentation. There were some 'jerks' even on my powerful system (dual xeon).

There are no HD photos and those that are there are generic.

Bottom Line:
There's a free trial so one can find out if my comments are true. I reckon the HD vids will suit many customers. There are about 4 pages of 16 videos at present, so not a mega site.

I cancelled the trial, basically because the full cost doesn't justify - this is only my opinion, and I'm fairly fussy about quality. Note that you get a fair offer when you goto cancel.

Visit HD Solo Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

Hi Def Lesbos Review

Thu, 05 Apr 2007 19:41:22 PDT

Hi Def Lesbos (1)

04-05-07 07:41pm

REVIEW = 81 by Levchik (17)

Pros:
-Awesome quality of the videos!
-Found some rare/nice girls here.
-Very easy navigation.
-No pop-ups or other nagging stuff.
-Access to bonus movies and pictures galleries.
-Almost all movies can be downloaded/viewed in parts or in full version.
-Movies can be viewed in Windows Media Player (WMV) and in QuickTime (MOV). Also in three different qualities (High, Medium and Low).
-As a full member, you will also get access to additional 9 sites.

Cons:
-Live shows are time-limited.
-I had troubles with some bonus galleries on 3rd party sites.
-There is a limited bandwidth. Speed was really terrible (both for streaming and downloading).
-There are no galleries on 'Hi-Def Lesbos'.
-The name of the site is misleading. 'Hi-Def threesomes' would fit better.
-Not all movies can be viewed in all players (see above), nor in all qualities and not by parts.
-Bonus sites are not unique. The movies are not HD and can't be directly downloaded!

Bottom Line:
A cool site in general. The name of the site might confuse some people as there is no pure lesbian action on this one. I did not really like the download speed because one full high-definition movie will take hours to get downloaded; if this will be fixed, the site will be much better and enjoyable.
Here are some thoughts I would like to share:
-I expected such site to be protected with DRM, but fortunately, there is no such protection and you can store the videos on your hard drive (or somewhere else) without being concerned about licenses.
-I was really surprised when I saw that some scenes on 'Hi-Def LESBOS' are acted by one woman and one guy (huh, it should be a lesbian site).
-I strictly suggest to try the trial membership before trying the "real thing" to see if the site meets your requirements!
All in all, worth a try.

Visit Hi Def Lesbos - View Replies - Add Reply

Snatches Review

Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:33:42 PST

Snatches (2)

01-23-07 02:33pm

REVIEW = 80 by OneMan (16)

Pros:
Excellent quality of HiDef Vids.
Very naughty, lots of close-ups - if you too have a 50" Plasma - you have been warned !!!!!

Cons:
Very slow site.

Of all the mayors network, this is the slowest, which, given the fact that the highest quality vids are like 500mb, means it can take 2 hours to download.

I am getting speeds at the other sites (eg. CaseyHays and Brooke Sky) of around 300kbps, whilst this one is lower than a 100kbps at times, sometimes going up to around 175 kbps which is shared if you try to download multiple files - so if you want the good vids, be prepared to wait !

Not a huge amount of stuff yet

Bottom Line:
Only worth admission as part of the entire Mayors Network, or if you really like HiDef close-ups - or if you are a budding medical student - nuff said I think !

Visit Snatches - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen HDV Review

Sun, 21 Jan 2007 13:32:51 PST

Teen HDV (1)

01-21-07 01:32pm

REVIEW = 75 by blinded (1)

Pros:
High quality pictures and movies
Exclusive content

Cons:
Site is quite confusing
By far not enough content for the high price tag
No updates in nearly two months

Bottom Line:
If you are into ultra high quality pics and movies of solo girls this site might be interesting for you.
But the lack of content and the infrequent updates gives the site a bad taste.

Visit Teen HDV - View Replies - Add Reply