<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Public Nudity - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=76</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23182</guid>
		<title>Public Flash Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23182</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicflash/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicflash.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Public Flash&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicflash/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Public Flash&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-08-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;78&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Newer videos 720x480, many older ones 640x480.&lt;br /&gt;
-Nice archive, presently 117 video shoots.&lt;br /&gt;
-Many natural, attractive girls who seem to really enjoy flashing. Most of them are very enthusiastic. &lt;br /&gt;
-Attractive price through the link from TBP.&lt;br /&gt;
-Member forum. Provides news about future updates and you can post suggestions and comments.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Many videos do not have photo shoots and many photo shoots do not have videos.&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos do not have a link to download the entire video at once. In the member forum the webmaster recently promised to add a link.&lt;br /&gt;
-Updates may take as long as two weeks for an entire shoot. Updates a few clips at a time.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file. Many photos poor quality. Apparantly not adding new photo shoots.&lt;br /&gt;
-May not be all exclusive as the main photographer has videos on other flashing websites.&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus sites streaming only with poor quality videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Most of the videos were a lot of fun and better than I expected. I counted three with oral sex and a few with a little masturbation, so not only skin. A lot of the videos were quite explicit. A variety of races and ethnicities as well as body types, although most were thin. Most appear to be amateurs, although the shoot of Hannah Hilton was good. I would definitely sign up again in a few months.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1669&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Public Flash&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23182&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23182&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 11:04:57 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12638</guid>
		<title>Nude In Public.tv Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12638</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudeinpublictv/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nudeinpublictv.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nude In Public.tv&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudeinpublictv/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nude In Public.tv&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-22-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:24am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 60&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;asmith12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;86&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ unique content&lt;br /&gt;
+ real nude girls in real streets&lt;br /&gt;
+ FULL videos (unlike NudeInPublic)&lt;br /&gt;
+ girls are &amp;quot;girl next door&amp;quot; type, but not ugly&lt;br /&gt;
+ frequent (but disgustingly small) updates&lt;br /&gt;
+ picture quality is decent&lt;br /&gt;
+ girl date of birth and shooting place for each shoot are shown
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- not so good attempt to mimick NudeInPublic&lt;br /&gt;
- repetitive (especially compared to NudeInPublic&lt;br /&gt;
)&lt;br /&gt;
- video quality is mediocre&lt;br /&gt;
- micro-updates of 20 pictures a time are disgustingly small&lt;br /&gt;
- bigger files hosted by 3rd-party (with separate login/password)&lt;br /&gt;
- not that much content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					After my recent (and not so successful) attempt to join NudeInPublic (.com) - see my review, I've decided to try &lt;a href=&quot;http://NudeInPublic.tv&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NudeInPublic.tv&lt;/a&gt; . Unfortunately, it turned out to be even bigger disappointment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It looks that it is an independent attempt to do something similar to NudeInPublic, but unfortunately it has lots of definiencies. The main one is that they lack creativity of NudeInPublic. There are no scenarios and different situations here, just nude girl going through the streets. Everything else isn't that bad, &lt;br /&gt;
and (unlike NudeInPublic) these guys don't try to sell the same thing twice, so videos are FULL), but unless some creativity is thrown in, the site doesn't offer much of useful content. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So much for my attempt to find site of this very niche :-(&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line:&lt;br /&gt;
comparing them to NudeInPublic isn't that straightforward: these guys do have FULL videos (BIG PLUS), but with much less creativity (BIG MINUS). Overall, if you're a big fun of nude girls walking through crowded streets, I'd still recommend NudeInPublic over &lt;a href=&quot;http://NudeInPublic.tv&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NudeInPublic.tv&lt;/a&gt; (but read my review of them CAREFULLY - it's not a picnic there too, and I gave them only 68 rating); if you're not a big fan of these things - don't bother.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nude-in-public.tv&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nude In Public.tv&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12638&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12638&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:24:16 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4408</guid>
		<title>Nude In Public.tv Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4408</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudeinpublictv/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nudeinpublictv.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nude In Public.tv&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudeinpublictv/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nude In Public.tv&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:52am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;magman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1598&quot;&gt;29&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Real public nudity&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Lots of spectators in the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Exclusive and pretty unique content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Date of birth mentioned with every girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Decent quality pictures. (which help you make out the faces in the videos sometimes)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					* Navigation on the site leaves some things to be desired&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* They only talk German in the videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Quality of the videos are way below par with some girls.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Video formats vary with every girl.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Every video is kind of the same.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nudeinpublictv/&quot;&gt;Nude-In-Public.tv&lt;/a&gt; is actually not really a bad site, but a site which has some flaws that need to be worked out.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Like the navigation on the site, which used to be just horrible. &lt;br /&gt;
But they seem to fixing that as it changed in the last year or so. Still it leaves some things to be desired.&lt;br /&gt;
Also they are uploading bigger and longer videos than before.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content itself is all pretty much the same. All of the videos consist of girls walking around towns and cities in Germany in the buff. Nothing more, nothing less. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of the videos is actually horrible at times, especially the older ones. You can hardly make out the faces sometimes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there are a lot of spectators and it's real. It's all been recorded in the big cities of Germany. So if you're German and you're into these sort of things, this might be a whole lot of fun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But all in all I'd have to say that this site will most likely bore you after the third video. &lt;br /&gt;
Although they are changing the site a bit every now and then. &lt;br /&gt;
So it does have some potential.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But for now 30 bucks a month just seems a bit steep for this content. Also there is no trial-account.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nude-in-public.tv&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nude In Public.tv&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4408&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4408&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 09:52:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3173</guid>
		<title>Public Flash Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3173</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicflash/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicflash.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Public Flash&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicflash/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Public Flash&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-19-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:03pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;301&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Flashing looks to be 100% real and in locations that I have seen in person. &lt;br /&gt;
- Some of the girls are really cute, some are pretty, some are average.&lt;br /&gt;
- Models walk up to strangers and talk to them while flashing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Everything is average quality or better, pics and vids
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- There really isn't a whole lot to see on here&lt;br /&gt;
- Extreme softcore, very little touching, just quick flash, stop, start over. &lt;br /&gt;
- Person videoing talks through the whole thing&lt;br /&gt;
- 3rd party content wasn't interesting either
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I've always been intrigued by exhibitionism and voyeurism, and had saw some samples from this site. I was expecting much more. The samples I saw were the most hardcore parts of the site, and those were even tame. I only downloaded maybe 4 of the girls' videos and pictures, but have never went back to them since downloading them. I would rate it lower, but it does say public flash, not public sex or public masturbation. It just left a lot to be desired for me. If they added maybe 1-2 more clips furthering the tease, then it would rate higher. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My best way to describe my feelings towards the site would be to say I feel like I was in a gym with nothing but women and I walked into the dressing room only to get the door slammed in my face at the last minute!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely need more content and more skin for me and more touching. To put it plainly, it is a very vanilla site. Not recommended if you are wanting more than just basic flashing.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1669&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Public Flash&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3173&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3173&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:03:02 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_2042</guid>
		<title>Public Invasion Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2042</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicinvasion/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicinvasion.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Public Invasion&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicinvasion/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Public Invasion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-07-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:09pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=316&quot;&gt;Woodruff&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=316&quot;&gt;37&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Hot European girls, some I haven't seen elsewhere&lt;br /&gt;
- Very funny narrator / male talent&lt;br /&gt;
- High quality video&lt;br /&gt;
- &amp;quot;In public&amp;quot; theme is hot - even if it is a little contrived
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Thumbnails for movie clips aren't accurate - have to download and see&lt;br /&gt;
- Movie files are rather large for the quality you get&lt;br /&gt;
- Other sites on the network are, strangely, kind of boring
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site executes the &amp;quot;in public&amp;quot; theme well, with hot girls and a really funny narrator (just as good as Bangbros' Sanchez or Preston).  Aside from a few minor technical issues, the only other downside is that the other sites on this network are not that interesting - same hot girls, same high quality video, but they feel flat for some reason.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10745&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Public Invasion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=2042&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=2042&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 15:09:17 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1812</guid>
		<title>Cuties Flashing Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1812</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutiesflashing/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/cutiesflashing.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Cuties Flashing&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutiesflashing/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cuties Flashing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:48am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 62&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=252&quot;&gt;elephant&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=252&quot;&gt;22&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very cute girls and great idea for a site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Terrible quality vids and pics not much better, such a waste getting these really cute girls to strip and flash outside in ok some scenes are pretend, its obvious but still would be great with good quality vid, you can hardly see anything with the camera they use.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
also not many vids just over 1 page
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					a waste of money , be good if done right with a decent camera for hi-res vids
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13863&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Cuties Flashing&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1812&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1812&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 06:48:07 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1533</guid>
		<title>Public Invasion Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1533</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicinvasion/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicinvasion.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Public Invasion&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicinvasion/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Public Invasion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=344&quot;&gt;bjorn7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=344&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Good outdoor blowjob amatuer sex.&lt;br /&gt;
Most scenes end in a big facial or cum shot&lt;br /&gt;
in girls mouth and then she swallows.&lt;br /&gt;
Variety of girl types which keeps it interesting.&lt;br /&gt;
Part of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bigasspass/&quot;&gt;BigAssPass&lt;/a&gt; -3 others sites included.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lots of talking before things get rolling.&lt;br /&gt;
Video quality not great.&lt;br /&gt;
No full downloads-either 3 big clips or many&lt;br /&gt;
small clips per scene.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					How does this guy get all these girls to suck his&lt;br /&gt;
crooked cock in public places throughout Europe?&lt;br /&gt;
Good outdoor action with willing girls makes this&lt;br /&gt;
a good site.  I only wish full scene downloads&lt;br /&gt;
were an option.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10745&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Public Invasion&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1533&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:22:17 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1529</guid>
		<title>Public Nude Sluts Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1529</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicnudesluts/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/publicnudesluts.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Public Nude Sluts&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/publicnudesluts/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Public Nude Sluts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-12-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:21am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=688&quot;&gt;tonyasher&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=688&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Attractive young models, baring all in public parks, on the street, etc., always less than a stone's throw from passersby. These models flash their boobs and pussies, and sometimes they pee and sometimes they masturbate. And sometimes they're seen by the passersby, but they brazenly carry on, loving it. All this, in DVD quality wmv videos and high rez photographs, all downloadable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Could use more content. But the site seems young. Hopefully it will grow to a large size. And I wish the action included more masturbation! And that all the girls had videos. Only about half of them do.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you love public nudity, and young attractive girls, in high quality downloadable videos and photographs, this site is for you. I do, and I love this site!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12636&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Public Nude Sluts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1529&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1529&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:21:37 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>