<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Insertions - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=66</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_27429</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27429</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-25-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:42pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 94&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;Mr Fountain&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3570&quot;&gt;28&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The pictures are fant-ass-tic: If you have a flat screen monitor that can fit these 2400 X 1700; 2200 X 1800;2400 x 1600&lt;br /&gt;
# new model every 2 days&lt;br /&gt;
#video comes in 2 min; 8-10minute; or 15+ min size; 3-10 videos per model &lt;br /&gt;
# about 240 models issues &lt;br /&gt;
some models have multi shoots&lt;br /&gt;
#this is a must site for hi def vid lovers; ass jiggling lover; upskirt lovers; in your face panty vids; in your face ass grabbing and shake the booty in you face; spread cheeks apart;  pee videos--get ready to lie on the floor facing skyward, because thats the view..&lt;br /&gt;
# oh and pussay in your face; dildo in pussay in your face, and speculum shots&lt;br /&gt;
#the models are gorgeous and top notch&lt;br /&gt;
#If you have hi speed internet and a large screen monitor and love porn; this site is an easy top five site..  &lt;br /&gt;
# top five site for hi rez pictures&lt;br /&gt;
#download zip files; small or large; 14.6 mb for small; 56.4 mb for large pics (per 20) pics..&lt;br /&gt;
#vids come in 640 x 360; 1280 x 720; 1920 x 1080
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					# the pics blow up so big, I can't see them on my tiny laptop screen...&lt;br /&gt;
#will have to have the latest technology to fully enjoy this site.&lt;br /&gt;
#my wireless internet takes two hours to download a 12 minute video!&lt;br /&gt;
#the hi def vid files are huge and you will have to have the harddrive space; or an exterior hard drive to save them all.&lt;br /&gt;
$34.95 month membership price is higher than avg.&lt;br /&gt;
# there is ususally just one photo series per model issue avg 85-140 pics ( though some of the models have multiple issues.&lt;br /&gt;
# their is no sex on site..
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I reccomend this site as a must see for those with hi speed connections; large flat panel screens; and a love for a lot of Hi def video and pics. This site very much is for those with this technology to enjoy what it has to offer.In fact, I would reccomend In the crack collections of vids and pics against the top video sites; including FTV girls. In the crack no doubt is shot a lot closer thatn FTv girls, titties jiggling in your face; tons of bootay shaking; speculum, masterbation, dildoes, upskirts and picture views as if you are looking straight up.  &lt;br /&gt;
However, if you don't have this technology or a lot of room on your hard drive; then I can't suggest it for you. I don't have hi speed internet so I can't download the 17 minute video. unless I am willing to be downloading for three hours.. for this reason, I probably will wait to rejoin when I have hi speed connection...I really can't see the whole sight.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
you will see lots of pee video with her puss inches from your face; some vids have the model sit in the chair with their legs spread apart peeing straight up like a geyser. Also, some Virgin Island shoots with beautiful models on the beach in their bikinis.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
they will shake their titties and booty in your face. Trust me, your face is always inches away the whole time makeing some great vids.. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but I can look at the pics are spectacular; some beautiful loaclas; all with with bead of water, pore of skin sharpness..&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If I had hi speed internet; I would be on this site all the time; but I don't so I likely will be missing out on a lot of the site...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=27429&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=27429&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:42:37 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23274</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23274</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-10-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4128&quot;&gt;plan b&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4128&quot;&gt;11&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Large amount of content&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good visual quality in pics &amp;amp; videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos available up to full 1080p @ 8mbps&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures up to 2000px on the long end with zip downloads&lt;br /&gt;
- Fast, I mean FAST download speeds&lt;br /&gt;
- Simple, yet straightforward navigation&lt;br /&gt;
- More frequent update schedule as of July 08&lt;br /&gt;
- Their &amp;quot;tour&amp;quot; allows you to see everything
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very expensive&lt;br /&gt;
- Some pictures cropped to lower pixel resolutions&lt;br /&gt;
- Too much focus on the ass (may be a &amp;quot;pro&amp;quot; for others)&lt;br /&gt;
- No official support for download managers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is my 3rd tour with ITC. I used to buy their videos using their antiquated token system but it got prohibitively expensive. Now that they're all inclusive, I can go back and complete the old video collections.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you're looking at reviews for this site, you're probably interested in this very unique type of content. Those into &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;artsy&amp;quot; porn need not apply. But if you want nothing left to the imagination, this site is in a world of its own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The quality of models have improved a lot since I was last on their site. But the focus on more professional models means that some of the fresh faces they had in the past aren't likely to crop up again (Rachel &amp;amp; Natasha were my 2 faves).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All their videos are segmented, I didn't list this as either pro or con since everyone will see this a little differently. i.e... I love pissing scenes but not everyone does so it's nice to be able to grab just the videos you're interested in. If you like it all, I've got good news for you. If you have bandwidth, you wont have too many problems downloading the 1080p videos. I routinely saw one megabyte/second avg speeds. A few videos came in _averaging_ 1.8 megabytes/sec which surprised me since that's faster than my connection's theoretical max.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Visual quality of videos and pictures are great. My only complaint would be that color saturation tends to be a bit flat in most videos, but some might appreciate the truer, more natural color balance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also, their &amp;quot;tour&amp;quot; isn't so much a tour. You can actually go in and see all their video/photo shoots with full descriptions of every scene by clicking on the Models link. You just need a membership to access the photos or download videos. What you see is what you get. I wish every site approached acquiring new members this way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What would make it perfect in their niche? A lower price for one. I think $25/mo is appropriate, even $30 would be acceptable. I'd like to see an even, 50/50 focus on pussy &amp;amp; ass. More clit shots! They have the perfect opportunity to capture what I consider the most elusive view in all of porndom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Despite the high price, I'm letting this one renew.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23274&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23274&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 19:31:20 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22463</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22463</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-18-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:41pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 94&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of content available.&lt;br /&gt;
- Beautiful models, mostly professional.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are top-end and can be downloaded in different sizes (you can view specs in guest tour). Fewer options with older material.&lt;br /&gt;
- Zip files for pics, in medium or large.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photo quality is superb, often simply stunning.&lt;br /&gt;
- Detailed descriptions for each video.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM.&lt;br /&gt;
- Search function for type of vids you want to see.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of options for how you wish view each pic set.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site borders on fetishism on two accounts: anal and watersports. Way too many pee-pee videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Sometimes the camera angle is disorienting and downright annoying. Even stupid at times.&lt;br /&gt;
- That &amp;quot;fish-eye&amp;quot; lens thing can be silly and makes all the models look like Jennifer Lopez with butt-implants. Not that there's anything wrong with a big ass.&lt;br /&gt;
- While downloading, you can't open any of the pictures. Haven't tried to DL 2 vids at once but that's probably disallowed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Speculum shots are pretty much useless, as far as I can tell.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Ever imagine what it might be like to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; park her delectable keester on your face? Well, this place will give you a pretty good idea. As someone else said, this site is all about ass. It's ass directly in your mug, for extended periods of time. It's a flea's-eye view of the female anus in all its pursed and pleated glory. Oh, and let's not forget the vagina. You can see that too. Proctologists and gynocologists could use these clips for reference purposes. Did you ever wonder what a girl's pancreas looks like? You just might get a view.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While it's decidedly ass-obsessed, there are plenty of beautiful breasts to see as they are lathered, oiled, and bobbled. Personally, I could watch Alexis Love and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; wash their breasts for a good long while. I'd even offer to help if their hands got tired, seeing as I'm such a gentleman.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for pics, I don't know of any site that offers such crisp, close, detailed photography of the female plumbing system. If you like pics of women from the ground up, or if you like to imagine what it would be like to be a beautiful woman's chair, this place is for you. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I don't know what else to say that hasn't been covered by the others. While I have nits in particular about the sometimes dizzying camera angles, and the sometimes puerile fixation on pee-pee, they are negligible when compared with the benefits of a membership here. I have a pic of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt; winking at me on my desktop. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can see her eyes too.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22463&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22463&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 15:41:07 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_22307</guid>
		<title>Veggie Bang Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22307</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/veggiebang/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/veggiebang.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Veggie Bang&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/veggiebang/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Veggie Bang&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:44pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;badandy400&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;77&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice trial price&lt;br /&gt;
Good looking girls&lt;br /&gt;
Short interview before sex&lt;br /&gt;
Access to a good deal of small sites&lt;br /&gt;
Videos look nice&lt;br /&gt;
Sticks to its name, Veggies!&lt;br /&gt;
No DRM or limits
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Very small site&lt;br /&gt;
No hardcore or even Girl/Girl&lt;br /&gt;
Site very simple, too simple&lt;br /&gt;
Camera guy needs to shut up sometime&lt;br /&gt;
Sometimes pretty lame camera work&lt;br /&gt;
Many network sites do not work right
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					AT this point this site is only worth a trial in my opinion.  It need a good amount of growth to stand on its own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It only has 17 videos totaling for 2.94 GB.  The videos are 10-20 minutes long and at 2 MBit/s.  The resolution is al the same at 640x480 and look fairly nice.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site gives access to a load of other sites.  This sounds great except that many of the sites do not work or have about the same content as other sites offered.  There are enough sites that do work to make a trial worth while.  You just have to use trial and error for a minute to find one that will take you to something real.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are into teens inserting veggies than this one should be put your list of site to check out.  But make sure you have a few days to make the most of the trial.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13215&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Veggie Bang&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=22307&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=22307&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:44:13 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_19626</guid>
		<title>Brutal Dildos Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19626</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/brutaldildos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Brutal Dildos&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-29-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:10am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 76&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3848&quot;&gt;visor&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3848&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Features large dildos&lt;br /&gt;
Watermarks for new vids are small&lt;br /&gt;
Niche site - does what it says on the tin
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Models variable in attractiveness &lt;br /&gt;
Quality of video not to videobox/sex and submission/abby winters current standard&lt;br /&gt;
Not a huge selection of these&lt;br /&gt;
Pics reasonable&lt;br /&gt;
Vast majority of vids use same 2 dildos - lacks creativity
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Niche site does what it says.  Single girls masturbating with large standard dildos in ass and pussy - with the occasional unseen operator helping out.  If you want more variation, don't go there.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=652&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19626&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=19626&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:10:55 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18414</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18414</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-03-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:01pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3965&quot;&gt;turboshaft&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3965&quot;&gt;8&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ CLOSEUP exclusive content! This site lives up to its name&lt;br /&gt;
+ Clear, well-lit photography, w/ newer vids in HD&lt;br /&gt;
+ Hot models (though they certainly don't focus on faces) who get creative: speculums, anal, peeing, toys, veggies...&lt;br /&gt;
+ Photos available to all members, and now, finally, all video as well&lt;br /&gt;
+ Some girl-girl
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Pretty high price&lt;br /&gt;
- More girl-girl needed&lt;br /&gt;
- Closeups this closeup may not be for everyone&lt;br /&gt;
- Took them way too long to drop their token video system&lt;br /&gt;
- Older models have smaller pics
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Love closeup photography? Well, this site is so far in the crack it's practically in the hole; this site takes the genre so far that any closer and these girls' cheeks and lips would be smudging the lens. Their bigger photos (1600x1200, some 2400x1800) are huge, and you can easily end up staring at a crack (or hole) bigger than your monitor, or even real life. You will probably spend a few hours just admiring the pics, or at least getting a detailed lesson on female anatomy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's a blessing that they finally dropped their stupid pay-per-view token video system, especially considering the price. The fact that they were doing this for so long - screwing over members who had already paid (and losing potential business) - is probably the biggest reason for not giving them a higher score. I first learned of this site after a friend showed me a video, but I was let down when I found out they were separate from the regular membership. Still, their photography can practically stand on its own, though their vids are also quite entertaining (queefing vags, winking assholes, masturbation, pissing). I personally prefer shorter clips (5-10mins) than longer, boring vids, but it does mean more DLs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think anybody who joins this site already likes this stuff, but there are a few who probably think this is aimed at gynecologists and dermatologists, so it doesn't have universal appeal, but few sites do. For those who do like their porn up close, then this really hits the mark (crack?).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18414&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18414&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:01:18 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17411</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17411</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:34am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 91&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2568&quot;&gt;williamj&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2568&quot;&gt;7&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					When they say In the Crack they mean it!  If your into gyno, in your face closeups of ass and pussy meat you have to tour this site.  These guys worship the ass in both pic's and videos.  If your an ASSMAN your going to love their xxx focus on the ass and shaved cunt.  Nice round and fatty ruby asses. The models are very XXX showing you everything, no holds bar extreme. Hardcore solo masturbation and exhibitionism. The girls lay it all out in the pics and the videos. &lt;br /&gt;
-cunt and ass worshiping; very strong focus on gyno upclose pics and video&lt;br /&gt;
-tons of pictures, three different series of each girl&lt;br /&gt;
-their style of video is unquie, I found the level of eroticism to be excellent&lt;br /&gt;
-the models are a bit older not teenie...great bodies&lt;br /&gt;
-erotic locations, outfits and posing&lt;br /&gt;
-they deliver what the say... Deep In the Crack
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The videos are broken up into parts no option for a complete download.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you like hot wet cunny, girls being totally xxx and explicit, lots of pussy finger and dildoe fucking and spreading gyno wide, lots of lube, nice amount of anal play, pissing, in your face close-ups of hot cunny... stop reading and join...I was a member previously but this is the first time where all the videos are available for downloading.  Top quality porn...they got themselves a hot site. I don't fluff my ratings.  To get a 90+ from me the porn site really would have to impress me.  I only like solo girl or lezzie sites and I have been a memeber of all the top sites in that catagory and I never rated any of them a 90+. In the Crack is my first 90+ and the girls and site deserved it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17411&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17411&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:34:47 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_17113</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17113</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					03-06-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:12pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3313&quot;&gt;Davit&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3313&quot;&gt;46&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Lots of rude, rude (I mean RUDE) anal girls&lt;br /&gt;
-Highly original site, quite unlike any other&lt;br /&gt;
-Technically brilliantly shot movies (seriously some of the best filming in porn I have ever seen)&lt;br /&gt;
-Ditto picture sets&lt;br /&gt;
-Movies available in range of download sizes&lt;br /&gt;
-Nice big archive&lt;br /&gt;
-Despite no official support - DMs do tend to work&lt;br /&gt;
-Responsive customer support
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Girls in the movies tend to lack passion&lt;br /&gt;
-Can get a bit repetitive and boring&lt;br /&gt;
-Not too clear on regularity of updates, or when new ones are due&lt;br /&gt;
-Some of the shots are very very close-up - when you see a pussy or asshole filling the entire screen, it can cease to be sexy, and start to look like a biology lesson&lt;br /&gt;
-No long all-in-one movies - but this is not a big prob - the parts are often several minutes and can be loaded into your media player's playlist for one long continual experience&lt;br /&gt;
-Picture sets have lots of near-identical shots, and need some serious pruning.  Many could easily be a third the size, and be better for it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Imagine you have hired a sexy escort girl to come back to your place to give a private show, just for you.  You're sitting back in your chair, and she stands right in front of you.  She turns round, pulls her panties aside, and parts her ass cheeks to give a birds eye view of her tight asshole getting stretched open.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, that is how many of these movies start, and what a way to start!  The girls often progress to striking all kinds of incredibly rude poses, generally focusing on their anuses.  The camera gets in close, and doesn't miss a thing.  Eventually, the girls masturbate, again with much ass play.  Happily, dildos are not overused - you are as likely to see disappearing fingers as you are vibrators and toys.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are also a few 2-girl sets inc. sensual massage + ass play.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside is, the action often seems contrived, moves at a very leisurely pace, and is very repetitive.  The girls are clearly putting on a show for the viewer - which in itself is not a bad thing.  But they never seem to lose themselves in abandoned passion.  It's much more about showing off their bodies and sexual bits - rude exhibitionism, rather than images of girls masturbating and having fun getting off.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The picture sets have some amazing individual pics in them - but too often you will get about 9 pics in a row, all close-ups of an open pussy, and its like playing 'spot the difference'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, top marks for originality.  Ass fans should visit this fine site at least once.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
UPDATE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have lowered my score from 89 to 80, having had some time to re-evaluate the material.  This is still within the 'very good' range as this is a very original site.  But I find the passage of time since downloading the content has not been kind.  The movies have become boring to me very quickly; I find myself fast forwarding through too many movies to get to an exiting part.  There's just a lack of passion.  Likewise, the photo sets have too much uninteresting filler, and too many near-identical shots that the webmaster probably couldn't bring himself to edit out.&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: this is a highly original site, but there are still hotter all-girl anal sites out there.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=17113&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=17113&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 15:12:28 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16591</guid>
		<title>Brutal Dildos Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16591</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/brutaldildos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Brutal Dildos&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-23-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:19pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The toys are definitely huge.&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the girls are very attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
Lots of content.&lt;br /&gt;
Everything is downloadable.&lt;br /&gt;
Some bonus sites and content to sift through.&lt;br /&gt;
Navigation is ok.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Model quality over the last year is spotty at best, and pales in comparison to the models when the site launched.&lt;br /&gt;
Updates do not always come every day as advertised.&lt;br /&gt;
Download problems, sometimes movies cut off while downloading and this can happen consistently.&lt;br /&gt;
Webmaster never responds to e-mails.&lt;br /&gt;
Some videos have been changed from a 640x480 size to a 352X240.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					** Review updated 8/10/08 **&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've been a member to Brutal on and off since it opened up, more on than off.  For the niche that it is, this is the only real site that I have found.  Actually, I'm surprised there haven't been more true big dildo sites, since this one seems fairly popular and the &amp;quot;I Love Big Toys&amp;quot; series does very well for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/newsensations/&quot;&gt;New Sensations&lt;/a&gt; (regular porn).  Anyway, every girl on this site will be taking huge dildos, you can rest assured of that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another thing to note is that in the beginning stages of the site, almost all of the updates were of models that were either damn good looking or at least somewhat cute.  But over the last year or more the model quality has definitely decreased.  There are still good looking models, but not as many.  Still, the site has been around long enough now that if you join for the first time, you will be floored by the amount of content there is of girls fucking mammoth sized dongs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updates have changed.  Now it's &amp;quot;usually&amp;quot; once a week and you can download everything at once when it comes up, you no longer have to wait around for a week for the full video to come up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
New problems:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  Downloads are problematic and don't always finish.  This is very annoying and frustrating.  This happens especially when trying to download a whole movie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  For some mysterious and horrible reason, a bunch of the older videos that had a 640X480 video size option no longer do, and now only have a 352X240 as the biggest.  Are you kidding me?  Why in the heck would you do this?  Now it's fun trying to squint your eyes to see the movie.  Or wait, no it's not fun!  This was a horrible thing to do!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To be honest, the site just continues to regress instead of improve over time.  I've followed the site since it launched and more and more things continue to lower my interest in it.  First it was the uglier models, then the download problems, and now video sizes are getting smaller.  While other sites strive to improve their video size and quality, this one chooses to do the opposite, go figure.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you've never been a member, join once to pick up all the past updates and then plan on a goodbye, perhaps permanently.  Well, that is if you can download.  ;)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=652&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16591&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16591&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:19:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16321</guid>
		<title>Solo Butts Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16321</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solobutts/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/solobutts.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Solo Butts&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/solobutts/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Solo Butts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3684&quot;&gt;porngoblin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3684&quot;&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-HD resolution video&lt;br /&gt;
-original content&lt;br /&gt;
-good models
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-no hardcore, a bit better than softcore... &amp;quot;limpcore&amp;quot;?&lt;br /&gt;
-boring performances
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is one of the 4 flagship original content sites of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jerkednetwork/&quot;&gt;Jerked Network&lt;/a&gt;, and in my opinion the lamest. I am a huge fan of the ass niche, and when done right I need nothing more than the right girl using her ass the right way to get me going. But this site has neither the right girls, nor do they or the directors known how to use the female ass to really hook into the ass-man's weakness. The girls pretty much strip down unceremoniously like they were in a changing room at the Gap, just stand there, and then play with themselves obligatorily. When there is no hardcore to step up the action, it's all up to the directors and performers to turn it on, but this site has dialed it down to nearly the point of being a sleep aid for an ass fanatic like myself.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The girls are hot and the video resolution is the best there is, but the quality of the performances is too mediocre to warrant the time. There are better ass niche sites and HD sites than this. Luckily it's part of a network that has some better sites in it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16187&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Solo Butts&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16321&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16321&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:37:31 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15074</guid>
		<title>Mega Penetrations Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15074</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/megapenetrations/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/megapenetrations.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Mega Penetrations&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/megapenetrations/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Mega Penetrations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-18-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;12:37pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;asmith12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;86&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ &amp;quot;mega penetrations&amp;quot; as advertised&lt;br /&gt;
+ hardcore action in addition to &amp;quot;mega penetrations&amp;quot; (often up to DP, sometimes DPP) &lt;br /&gt;
+ reasonable variety (different toys and setups)&lt;br /&gt;
+ easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
+ &amp;quot;one big clip&amp;quot; download&lt;br /&gt;
+ access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jerkoffpass/&quot;&gt;Jerk-Off Pass&lt;/a&gt; network (27 more sites)&lt;br /&gt;
+ CCBill as card processor
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- sometimes action is disgusting&lt;br /&gt;
- girls aren't really cute (expected for this kind of content)&lt;br /&gt;
- probably infrequent updates (just as with other sites of this network)&lt;br /&gt;
- pics are just screenshots (quite blurry 640x480)&lt;br /&gt;
- annoying login (with difficult to recognize image recognition), auto-logouts.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Here comes yet another review of yet another &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jerkoffpass/&quot;&gt;Jerk-Off Pass&lt;/a&gt; site. While it isn't exactly my cup of tea, I'll still try to review.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Unlike most of the other sites of this network, there is not much plot in videos. Still, there are indeed &amp;quot;mega penetrations&amp;quot; as advertised, plus lots of hardcore action in each episode (often up to DP, sometimes even with DPP). Variety is here, but sometimes this site crosses the line going into things I consider outright disgusting (sorry guys, but eating stuff which sticks out of girl's ass isn't really my cup of tea; fortunately, it is just an occasional twist rather than typical for the site).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are about 30 episodes on the site, each is 20-30 min video. Cameraguy work is decent, but video encoding quality is typical for this network and is &amp;quot;very average&amp;quot; (not really clear 1.2MBit/s 640x480 WMV). &lt;br /&gt;
Pics on this site are just 640x480 screenshots, so pics lovers don't need to bother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As with the other sites of this network, updates aren't expected to be too frequent (see other my reviews of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jerkoffpass/&quot;&gt;Jerk-Off Pass&lt;/a&gt; sites).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: &lt;br /&gt;
For big dildo lovers, who don't care about pics, it should be a very good site. For others who aren't that much into this kind of things but (like me) can take an occasional look - can be a valuable addition to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jerkoffpass/&quot;&gt;Jerk-Off Pass&lt;/a&gt; network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12568&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Mega Penetrations&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15074&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15074&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 12:37:32 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_14013</guid>
		<title>Ladies Fuck Gents Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14013</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladiesfuckgents/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ladiesfuckgents.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Ladies Fuck Gents&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ladiesfuckgents/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ladies Fuck Gents&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-25-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:00am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=502&quot;&gt;Chanito&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=502&quot;&gt;4&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Good quality videos and images&lt;br /&gt;
-Downloadable videos (no streaming nonsense)&lt;br /&gt;
-Original content&lt;br /&gt;
-Nice looking girls&lt;br /&gt;
-Plenty of videos and pictures&lt;br /&gt;
-Loyalty bonus (you get access to an additional site for each month you stay a member)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Little female nudity&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos are in russian&lt;br /&gt;
-No regular sex, just fm strapon action&lt;br /&gt;
-Little female nudity
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The videos and pictures are good quality, original content.  However I didn't find them all that enjoyable.  The actors don't seem to involved in the sex.  Although some of the girls are hot you don't get to see too much of them, they wear the strapon on top of their clother for the most part.  Also the fact the videos are in russian makes it hard to understand the role-playing.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11365&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Ladies Fuck Gents&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=14013&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=14013&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2007 08:00:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_12568</guid>
		<title>All Fits In Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12568</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allfitsin/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/allfitsin.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter All Fits In&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/allfitsin/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;All Fits In&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-21-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:15am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;ace of aces&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;108&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ no drm&lt;br /&gt;
+ no dl limit&lt;br /&gt;
+ few fancy insertions&lt;br /&gt;
+ easy loginsystem&lt;br /&gt;
+ 56 pic sets&lt;br /&gt;
+ high res pics (1944x2592)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- regular price to high&lt;br /&gt;
- only 23 videos&lt;br /&gt;
- quality of videos is average to weak&lt;br /&gt;
- awful talking&lt;br /&gt;
- very limited content in the videos&lt;br /&gt;
- insertions are often the same (boring)&lt;br /&gt;
- no extras (only for extra costs)&lt;br /&gt;
- updated regular every 7 days, laste update missing !&lt;br /&gt;
- only one girl, the other girl rather seldom.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					hm..i am from germany, and folks belvie me, that stuff what the girls are talking isn`t that what you want to hear in a sexfilm. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the girls are looking average. the videos are average too. only 23 videos and such a high price is heavy. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the content is rather similar. the insertions are only (expect the car action but video quality is bad)&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;light&amp;quot; insertions and nothing what you expect from a niches site like that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
all fits in? why don`t you try (nealry) all that actress? i have seen much more in the net also at not niches sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the last update is missing, so that i am afraid that this site isn`t really a good deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
for that quantity and quality of content a price below 10$ is acceptable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in my opinion there is a lot work to do, therfore only below average.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15660&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit All Fits In&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=12568&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=12568&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:15:00 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_7416</guid>
		<title>In The Crack Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7416</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/inthecrack.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter In The Crack&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/inthecrack/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (7)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-25-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:25pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 83&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ASS is the emphasis here&lt;br /&gt;
+usually very fine Euro and American women; most are well-known&lt;br /&gt;
+117 gallery sets, most of which are of a unique model in two complete scenes&lt;br /&gt;
+excellent quality photography, esp from #15 to the present&lt;br /&gt;
+zips and individual pics available in small (approx. 800px) and large (1500 to 2400px) sizes, but see the cons!&lt;br /&gt;
+OK, collage-like previews of galleries (click “models” link, then click a gallery to see it)&lt;br /&gt;
+more recent vids in 640x360, 1280x720, and 1920x1080
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-only 3 new galleries + companion videos per month&lt;br /&gt;
-access to all photos costs $24.95; video downloads require purchasing tokens in a complex system based on video size and time length (e.g. a small and short one costs just several, but a large and long one can cost over 200).  Purchase examples:  500 tokens for  $23.95; 10,000 for $349.95. (:o)&lt;br /&gt;
-complete availability of large and small pics starts with gallery #43&lt;br /&gt;
-no standard pic sizes; a variety of custom dimensions
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					What I like are photos shot straight above a beautiful woman lying belly down, back straight, from the upper thigh to the top of her head, looking back amorously, her delectable ass beckoning.  What this site delivers is close, but either full-body length with the woman’s face buried in a mass of hair, or just the ass all by itself, nearly every single time!  Somehow with this site I almost NEVER get my wish!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, dear reader, you might get yours: ass in various positions and at many angles (just not my favorite one).  Colorful toys shoved into/sticking out of the three most popular orifices.  Closeups of cheeks pulled apart, shot from multiple XYZ coordinates.  Ditto that for the MOST popular body cavity.  This is what we call stretching.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Feminists say that porn objectifies women.  This site single-mindedly endeavors to do so, and it succeeds.  Our dehumanized pretties include &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt;, Alexis Love, Jassie, Sophie Moone, Sophie Paris, Addison Rose, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt;, Mia Stone, Lucy Stratilova, and many more.  And it can get very messy, such as with Layla Rivera’s toilet session.  (I’ll bet she’s a vegetarian.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The photo quality is so good and the women look so fine, with such detail that you can clearly see the texture of their skin.  It’s hard for me to believe how disappointing this site is -- for me, anyway.  200-350 photos per gallery is common here.  Why can’t I get my wish?  I do at lots of other sites.  It’s really weird.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And the videos?  Fuck that.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
Now you can join and get everything for $34.95.  I've been downloading lots of vids of girls like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/susanaspears/&quot;&gt;Susana Spears&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/karliemontana/&quot;&gt;Karlie Montana&lt;/a&gt;, and Peaches (among others) and the extended ass worship is very nice!  Don't need the closeup anus twiching, but some folks might enjoy it.  Boosted the score from 70 to 83.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=44&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit In The Crack&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=7416&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=7416&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 20:25:45 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_5544</guid>
		<title>Brutal Dildos Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5544</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/brutaldildos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Brutal Dildos&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-02-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:09am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;apoctom&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1810&quot;&gt;144&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of incredible vids: these toys are HUGE!&lt;br /&gt;
- Frequent updates: Yes, it's only one part of a scene per day, but that equals 1 scene every week&lt;br /&gt;
- All original vids are now downloadable as 1 file.&lt;br /&gt;
- Newer scenes are high quality wmv; older scenes are lower quality mpeg.&lt;br /&gt;
- Beautiful models: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/haileyyoung/&quot;&gt;Hailey Young&lt;/a&gt; does it for me.&lt;br /&gt;
- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckingmachines/&quot;&gt;Fucking Machines&lt;/a&gt; With Huge Dildos: There are a few older scenes with girls taking the brutal dildos with a machine. Amazing!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Price: For unique and exclusive content, the price is right, but it is still high for a porn viewer on a budget.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus sites: Lousy bonus sites. All bonuses are DVD rips and non-exclusive. Older bonuses must be downloaded in parts.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a fetish, niche site, no doubt. However, for what it is offering, I think it is wonderful. I won't be a long-term member, but I might buy a month every year to download the updates.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If it could join or start a network with more exclusive fetish/size sites and keep the same price, it could be an amazing deal.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=652&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=5544&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=5544&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:09:59 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1473</guid>
		<title>Brutal Dildos Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1473</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/brutaldildos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Brutal Dildos&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brutaldildos/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-09-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:38pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=65&quot;&gt;cerebral&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=65&quot;&gt;30&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Truly amazing scenes.  Best site for insertions and toys around.  Some of what these women take in the form of dildos is fascinating.  Updates seem to come often, and their models are very attractive.  Some like Shannon Kelly are a pleasure to watch over and over again.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Bonus sites are extensive, but quality is so, so.  In a few, like their fetish bonus site, access to and navigation leave much to be desired.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					So much to see and enjoy in this site.  It could be improved if restrains and the use of mechanical devices were used now and then.  Also, a few models in their 30s and 40s would be welcome, along with a few hot Asian women.&lt;br /&gt;
Overall, a very entertaining site that provides memorable scenes of insertions with very good quality video and downloading capabilities.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=652&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Brutal Dildos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1473&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1473&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 15:38:17 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>