<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Panties - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=52</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26881</guid>
		<title>Panty Amateur Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26881</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyamateur.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Panty Amateur&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					11-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:01am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=870&quot;&gt;Denner&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=870&quot;&gt;146&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice, no GREAT site, if you like very softcore - once in a while (if not, do not bother to read on).&lt;br /&gt;
Some fine and fabulous looking british girls/women with a sexy attitude, some sexy talk (NOT all) and hot lingerie.&lt;br /&gt;
Good amount af ok-quality videos - some newer ones in almost HD.&lt;br /&gt;
4,5,6 or more videoclips of the same model - great plus...&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
Fine updates - daily - it looks like.&lt;br /&gt;
Way over 1000 clips at this stage.&lt;br /&gt;
Some very exclusive videos of topmodels like Laurena Lacey (she just got a site of her own, almost) and a doll like Annalease.&lt;br /&gt;
You can download more than two videos at the same time...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Site-design is very simple - and not exiting (but here it's the videos that matters)&lt;br /&gt;
No photosets&lt;br /&gt;
Most videos only in MPG - a few newer once in WMV.&lt;br /&gt;
Earlier videos a bit overexposed or generally not very good quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Scenes are mostly quite repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
Some video-clips has disturbing background sound - some even sound like rain and thunder (like in Mickey Newburys songs)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Cannot not help it, but I really like this site - even if the content is very soft.&lt;br /&gt;
No masturbation, no close-up pussy clips, no hc, but some soft lez.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/a&gt; seems like a sister-site to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantymaniacs/&quot;&gt;Panty Maniacs&lt;/a&gt; - also british, but based in the Netherlands. And IT IS - a sistersite - or a co. -site.&lt;br /&gt;
But compared to the better scored PM this Panty Amateurs has quite a lot more. Foremost a far bigger content, better updates and some much better videos than PM.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all the great looking star, Laurena Lacay (here: Lorena) has 10 different videos and none is the same as the three at PM - and far better.&lt;br /&gt;
And the big titted and famous Petra here has 17 videoclips - she is also a knockout.&lt;br /&gt;
The same goes for a lot of other great british models where the amount of different videos with different outfit for the model is better than the &amp;quot;mothersite&amp;quot; -  PM.&lt;br /&gt;
Sizes are typical a little under 100 mb which makes it more userfriendly to download.&lt;br /&gt;
WMV: 960x540.&lt;br /&gt;
No stream.&lt;br /&gt;
And no photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course it's a bit annoying the way these videos stop before total nudity or masturbation, but ok, this is meant to be softcore and fetish panties - and if you can do with that, this site is great.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course I'd like to watch some of these great british model going more hc or just full nudity with some masturbation, but alas!!&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the models - but not the &amp;quot;finest&amp;quot; - apears on for exampel &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/suburbanamateurs/&quot;&gt;Suburban Amateurs&lt;/a&gt; with harder content (masturbation) and some in the somewhat similar &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlytease/&quot;&gt;Only Tease&lt;/a&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/a&gt; is a great site - if you can do with this kind of very softcore...&lt;br /&gt;
But, man - I'd like to watch Laurena Lacey or Petra or Annalease in some harder stuff.&lt;br /&gt;
Anybody knows where - if at all?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7458&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26881&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26881&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 09:01:17 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24883</guid>
		<title>Panty Jobs Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24883</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyjobs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Panty Jobs&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyjobs/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Panty Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:43am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 74&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5071&quot;&gt;elonlybuster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5071&quot;&gt;27&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Young attractive girls&lt;br /&gt;
-Good amount of content&lt;br /&gt;
-Good quality videos
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Updates once every blue moon&lt;br /&gt;
-There's ads eventhough you pay
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					First off this is like an advanced manual pleasure site.  That is you won't see any penetration or much else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The cam is POV, and high quality at that and you basically watch a girl grind on the guy, give him a handjob with her panties, and simple things like that.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As far as I could tell there's no download limit.  I downloaded 4 files simultaneously while browsing the site and no problems.  The same can be said with daily limits. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The big downfall to this site is that there's no search feature to find a certain girl by name or anything.  Not a big deal, but it would be nice to see it. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The videos are high quality, the girls are pretty attractive, there are a few screen caps, but lack of updates are can be annoying as well as a steep price just to watch a half-naked girl jack off a guy without much else. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IT goes without say that unless this is your cup of tea you'll probably pass right by without a second thought. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating of 74 due to the quality, background work, the girls, lack of updates, as well as a few smaller things.  After a year you should have a slightly better site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8749&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Panty Jobs&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24883&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24883&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:43:34 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_19383</guid>
		<title>Flower Panties Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19383</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowerpanties/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flowerpanties.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flower Panties&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowerpanties/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flower Panties&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:21am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;ace of aces&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;108&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ full trial access&lt;br /&gt;
+ exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ easy navigation
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- regular price to high&lt;br /&gt;
- low-medium video quality&lt;br /&gt;
- not much new things&lt;br /&gt;
- girls are not what i expected&lt;br /&gt;
- to less videos (arround 90) for that price and quality&lt;br /&gt;
- plain site design
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					positivly is to metion that you have trial access, but beware with the trial access you aren`t able to get to the networksites &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutiesintights/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutiesintights/&quot;&gt;CutiesInTights&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/peehunters/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/peehunters/&quot;&gt;PeeHunters&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/youngfatties/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/youngfatties/&quot;&gt;YoungFatties&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/plumperworld/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/plumperworld/&quot;&gt;PlumperWorld&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/plumpmature/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/plumpmature/&quot;&gt;PlumpMature&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/maturesworld/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/maturesworld/&quot;&gt;MaturesWorld&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckthistranny/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/fuckthistranny/&quot;&gt;FuckThisTranny&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/trannymovieclips/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/trannymovieclips/&quot;&gt;TrannyMovieClips&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
if i look at this extra content i am not really unhappy not getting access to that :).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the girls are not that hot as i wished. few of them don`t make me even trying to download the video, but that`s alway`s a question of taste.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
all in all i don`t think this site is worth trying it regular. also as a trial it`s nothing what fills my computer and makes me like watching it often.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
i like good quality videos, but you don`t find them here :(
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7412&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flower Panties&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=19383&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=19383&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:21:04 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_18502</guid>
		<title>Booya Thong Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18502</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/booyathong/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/booyathong.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Booya Thong&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/booyathong/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Booya Thong&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-05-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:35am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3986&quot;&gt;JBDICK&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3986&quot;&gt;19&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site should just rename itself Dasha &amp;amp; friends because at the end of the day, what is the critical mass reason everyone becomes a member, DASHA. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not sure if I can say this as a Pro (Good) thing for the site and at the same time sound so shallow. Dasha has the most perfect breasts on the planet, and if we found life elsewhere in the Universe I'm sure she's beat them hands down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Back to the other reasons why this site gets my rating. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hi-Res Photos but sometimes that just means big photos. These are different. They are so crisp, you can see the life in them. Sharp.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Love the detail shots of the body.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But that's where my Good points end.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Okay, here's my Bad points on this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this is a new site. the Photosets are Sharp. Look like they have been taken with Highest Res setting on a Professional Digital camera, by a photographer who knows lighting and obviously appreciates the female form.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So you really scratch your head when you look at the video. They either don't exist (Dasha, you should slap the photographer, he's giving you a bad reputation on this site) or they look like they've been done on someones cell/mobile phone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Come on. This is 2008, get the HD-DVD files uploaded, especially Dasha.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Updates: I think in my month of membership I saw 3. Talk about tight, sorry, that wasn't the kind of tight I was looking for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dasha, we'll give you the money, buy the Site and we'll run it for you, you deserve better.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've seen Dasha do hardcore and open shots, so why no show the man in the boat?
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Sorry, whinge over.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you are thinking about this site, it is expensive for what you get. half a dozen girls, yes in superb photosets, but hey, come on, give us what we really want, HD-DVD.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Did I feel ripped off. Yes, Do I regret joining. No. Why. Because Dasha has the best tits on the planet and the way she fills her skimpy underwear and poses will remind you why being a heterosexual male is worth a squeeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So, I would only join if like me you are prepared to be content with half a dozen galleries of Dasha. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If they did not have Dasha, they would have had a score of 50. It is a poor site. Dasha got them the extra 22 points and they didn't even have a HD-DVD file of her.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Follow-Up:&lt;br /&gt;
I am a dumb ass...WHERE I SAY Dasha in my review I mean DINA...Goddess of the best Boobs on Planet Earth. I can't believe I cocked up like that...Dina Dina Dina DINA...
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16352&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Booya Thong&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=18502&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=18502&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 10:35:32 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16281</guid>
		<title>Panty Amateur Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16281</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/pantyamateur.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Panty Amateur&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantyamateur/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:03pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 95&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Site has one mission and carries it out nearly perfectly.&lt;br /&gt;
- Video is top quality, with some HD. All vids, even as far back as 05, are top quality: at least 2000 kbps.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very attractive British models.&lt;br /&gt;
- One new vid every day.&lt;br /&gt;
- Tons of content. There may be over 800 videos at present.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Scenarios are repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download options. People with slow connections will need a lot of time on their hands.&lt;br /&gt;
- Limited nudity.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lighting bad in a few vids.&lt;br /&gt;
- If silicone were tea, this site would have more than China.&lt;br /&gt;
- Longer videos, with a bit more creative thinking, would be an improvement, though five minutes is pretty good for the material as it's currently presented.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you are looking for hardcore, masturbation, toys, etc, you will absolutely loathe this site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 If you find that panties just get in the way of the good stuff and feel that they are more of a nuisance than anything else, this site will cause you to become suicidal with boredom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that the thong is the greatest advancement in the history of women's underwear, this site will cause you to go postal on your monitor, and then you'll have to buy a new one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you feel that a &amp;quot;panty video&amp;quot; should include: panties around the ankles at all times, panties being sniffed, panties being inserted into various orifices, you are encouraged to avoid this site, in the same way that anyone with taste should avoid a Pauly Shore movie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you come to this site looking for porn, you will not find it, unless you're convinced that any woman who would allow herself to be photographed topless is a harlot in service to the Lord of the Underworld.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't take points off because of the limited scope of this site, because it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is. This is a video site, there are no pics; it's a panty-site, there's no hardcore. It's a site directly aimed at the panty/upskirt video collector, with a touch of voyeurism and mild sapphic play. If you're not interested in those things there is no reason for you to visit.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7458&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Panty Amateur&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16281&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16281&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:03:54 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_13823</guid>
		<title>Cute Panty Girls Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13823</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutepantygirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/cutepantygirls.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Cute Panty Girls&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutepantygirls/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cute Panty Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					12-19-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exhaustive and eclectic selection of panty-oriented content&lt;br /&gt;
- Some excellent video content&lt;br /&gt;
- Decent sized pics: avg 768x1024&lt;br /&gt;
- good bonus site on offer&lt;br /&gt;
- vids and pics are categorized for search purposes, but not in the actual lay-out of the site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Non-exclusive material&lt;br /&gt;
- lots and lots of boring, dated pic-sets&lt;br /&gt;
- pics seem to have been air-brushed to look fresher&lt;br /&gt;
- quality is pot-luck, hit and miss.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'm a panty/lingerie enthusiast and I must say things seem pretty dismal at this point all across netland, with a few rare exceptions. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cutepantygirls/&quot;&gt;Cute &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/pantygirls/&quot;&gt;Panty Girls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is more or less a grab-bag of odds and ends all tied together and semi-organized. I saw several sets from Panty Plaza and many others are over-familiar. There is some good stuff, but if you're into this kind of material odds are you've seen it before, and you've certainly seen better. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Video content is panty-oriented and fetish oriented. You'll see several high quality hand-job vids, some low-quality spanking vids, casting/strip/interview vids, masturbation, toys, even watersports. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pic content is mostly lingerie and panties, with focus on glamour/softcore. There are tons of sets, nearly 900 I think, and most of it, for the panty-enthusiast who's been around, is second-rate, not to mention non-exclusive. I have to say, though, there are some diamonds in the rough. I finally got the complete set from a pic I've loved for several years, for instance. Don't know where it comes from, but it's in the top five percentile for the avid undies/lingerie pic collector, of this I'm sure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Must mention there are two bonus sites. One of them, Jeans and Panties, contains 50 vids (and counting) which can be downloaded in HQ or HD. These vids are tepid in content but the quality is great, and the girls are gorgeous. Good quality pic sets accompany the vids. The other bonus site, Panty Lickers, offers decent quality vids and pics.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16242&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Cute Panty Girls&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13823&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=13823&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:22:57 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4525</guid>
		<title>LV Panty Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4525</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lvpanty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/lvpanty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter LV Panty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lvpanty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;LV Panty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					06-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:32pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;70&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Outstanding picture quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Complete fidelity to the niche.&lt;br /&gt;
Easy to navigate.&lt;br /&gt;
Models are (mostly) drop-dead gorgeous.&lt;br /&gt;
No degrading terminology.&lt;br /&gt;
Not &amp;quot;toy&amp;quot; obssessed.&lt;br /&gt;
No penises.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video section is still fairly small.&lt;br /&gt;
Image sets are a bit predictable and similar.&lt;br /&gt;
Too much emphasis on close-ups, but this is probably a good thing for others.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a mature site for picture lovers and panty connoisseurs, though perhaps it isn't as popular as some other sites in this niche because, while it features young ladies (18+) it doesn't have that teeny-bopper/schoolgirl atmosphere so typical to this kind of site. The sets are polished and professional and tend toward the artistic rather than the merely titillating. The models are beautiful and varied, though I would prefer more exotics. I think the general same-ness of the sets could be leavened with shots that are more relaxed and spontaneous rather than posed, and I would prefer less emphasis on close-ups. While those shots are fine, they tend to get over-familiar over the long-haul. The variety of panty styles is very good, and I'm pleased to see that thongs are NOT all the rage here. This site will make the old-schoolers happy, I think, because, after-all, thongs are for your feet.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lvpanty.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit LV Panty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4525&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4525&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:32:27 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1908</guid>
		<title>Lingerie Videos Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1908</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lingerievideos/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/lingerievideos.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Lingerie Videos&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lingerievideos/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Lingerie Videos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:52am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 98&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=848&quot;&gt;speedy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=848&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Love the site, it's updated with a new movie everyday. has large high quality movies and short clips of babes doing the nasty in stockings, lingerie and my fav latex.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
oh, also has some HD content and pictures.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A bit pricy, but worth it to me.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Not sure what to say but, if you like hot chicks in stockings, pantyhose, lingerie or latex it's a great site to be a member of.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
but you need a fast internet connection for some of the movies because all the full clips are 200mb + it takes me a long time to download on my slow connection. I usually stick with the short clips but sometimes like a movie part so much I need to download the whole thing.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=7182&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Lingerie Videos&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1908&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1908&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 10:52:49 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>