<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Swingers - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=45</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_16744</guid>
		<title>Swing Club Hunters Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16744</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingclubhunters/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swingclubhunters.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swing Club Hunters&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingclubhunters/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swing Club Hunters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-28-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:58pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 59&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3772&quot;&gt;alan&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3772&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Downloads smooth. Easy to get around site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Total number of site videos is a little misleading as the number of available videos includes the fact that for many of the videos, there are 4 to 6 different camera views of the same video. Some of the videos are in black and white, (or like night vision). Some of the videos are choppy and not clear. Defiently not worth the money.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I would not recommend this site as there are other sites, that cost less, that are much better.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16560&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swing Club Hunters&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=16744&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=16744&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:58:45 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15728</guid>
		<title>Swinger Quest Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15728</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingerquest/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swingerquest.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swinger Quest&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingerquest/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swinger Quest&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-01-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:22pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1945&quot;&gt;Chipster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1945&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Great couples swapping (Russian?). The younger women are all luscious, most of the older women are on fire as well.&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the younger couples are seduced by the older, adds to the excitement, like &amp;quot;What are you doing, ohhhh???&amp;quot; except in russian.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The men are not really equipped, sometimes the limp member pops out of the tight slit.  They have stopped updating, but there are some excellent bonus sites that make a 30 day membership.  If you like swinger sites, this really appears to be neighbors swapping off for some amateur sex.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Well worth the price, but not for more than 30 days. There are few good swinger sites like this that feature amateur russian neighbors trading off. I really enjoyed the scenes. Some great seduction.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=9528&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swinger Quest&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15728&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15728&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:22:01 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_15726</guid>
		<title>Swinger Tales Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15726</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingertales/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swingertales.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swinger Tales&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingertales/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swinger Tales&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-01-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:09pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 93&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1945&quot;&gt;Chipster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1945&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The couples are some amateurs that have been seen a few other places, but the women are most tantalizing, young and old.  Some of the women may be pushing 50 but put out like rabbits.  Usually features a young couple swapping with older couple.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					No updates for a while, but a great library
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If swinger lifestyle interests you, these are some great scenarios which lead to some great couples sex. There are quite a few bonus sites as well that make a first time subscription well worth it.  30 days should be more than adequate, a trial will not be enough.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=1103&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swinger Tales&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=15726&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=15726&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:09:40 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_9616</guid>
		<title>Swingers At Play Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9616</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingersatplay/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swingersatplay.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swingers At Play&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swingersatplay/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swingers At Play&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-30-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:05am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 55&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;asmith12&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706&quot;&gt;86&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ unique concept&lt;br /&gt;
+ real swingers&lt;br /&gt;
+ girls next door for those who like it&lt;br /&gt;
+ game ideas are fun&lt;br /&gt;
+ one-time payment option
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- not convinced that they play for real&lt;br /&gt;
- clips are in Russian with no subtitles&lt;br /&gt;
- not clear whether site is updated&lt;br /&gt;
- no ZIP download&lt;br /&gt;
- lighting and cameraguy work is amateurish&lt;br /&gt;
- sound track disappears from time to time
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I would like to say that their tour page doesn't really make them justice, but unfortunately it does - inside it's as dull as outside. It feels as a kind of abandoned site - it is not clear when there was last update, and whether there will be the next one. Still, at the price (by the way, there is a one-time subscribing option) you'll get 15 games, each with 15-20 minutes of unique content, and if it would be really good content, it still could be rather good deal, but here is where real problems start.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Idea is good and games could be fun, but overall feeling is not good: in part because of poor editing and breaks all the time, in part because it is spoiled for those who can't understand the language (supposedly Russian), in part because players sometimes aren't able to follow their own rules (at least as they're described on site), and go down to outright orgy pretty soon. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Quality of videos is formally decent (640x480x1100kBit/s), but is definitely spoiled by lack of proper lighting, cameraguy work and post-editing (which doesn't seem to be present at all); overall, looks very amateurish.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line: could be worth trying if you can understand Russian; otherwise even for as hardcore fun of sex games as I am, it is not worth the trouble or money.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=12963&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swingers At Play&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=9616&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=9616&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:05:58 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6622</guid>
		<title>Rico Shades Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6622</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ricoshades/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ricoshades.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Rico Shades&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ricoshades/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Rico Shades&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (0)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					07-31-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;03:49pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 90&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2008&quot;&gt;magic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2008&quot;&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The exclusive, non-purchased content, with super hot chicks!  They even have shoots with Euro girls on here, which is extremely rare in amateur sites.  Quality of pics and video are very high (especially the later volumes).  The edits are clean and cut well.  Also, the site is very easy to navigate and the content can be found easily.  The site updates weekly and consistently with new girls.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Still fairly new (less than a year old) so there's not the benefit of years and years worth of content.  However, with the weekly updates I've seen that is a minor concern.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					In the world of hyped up tours, dated material and just flat out fraud this site is worth your hard earned dollars.  Some of the hottest interracial content I've seen.  It's shot well, the quality is high and they updated consistently.  Good buy.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13983&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Rico Shades&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6622&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6622&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:49:35 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3256</guid>
		<title>Real Tampa Swingers Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3256</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realtampaswingers/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/realtampaswingers.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Real Tampa Swingers&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/realtampaswingers/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Real Tampa Swingers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-24-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:46pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=449&quot;&gt;OUMarcus&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=449&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Tracy's actually pretty attractive and she really seems to enjoy most of her encounters.&lt;br /&gt;
- This site features a pretty large number of videos and pictures crossing several years.&lt;br /&gt;
- You get some other site access with your membership (even with the trial membership)&lt;br /&gt;
- The trial membership was for full content access.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- The site seems a bit disorganized due to the somewhat amateur level of the site coding.&lt;br /&gt;
- The video quality varied pretty widely.&lt;br /&gt;
- Many of the guys participating in the encounters are just plain out of shape; that was pretty off-putting.&lt;br /&gt;
- A few times, Tracy seemed to get bored with the action.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					If you're looking for a decent quality amateur site, you might want to give this one a try.  You really can't go wrong checking it out over the 2 days that are included with the trial.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is basically a middle-of-the-road amateur site.  There are definitely better sites out there, but the full-access trial membership might be worth checking out.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6272&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Real Tampa Swingers&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3256&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3256&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:46:27 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3067</guid>
		<title>Dixie&#39;s Trailer Park Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3067</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dixiestrailerpark/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dixiestrailerpark.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dixie's Trailer Park&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dixiestrailerpark/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dixie's Trailer Park&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					04-15-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:47am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1230&quot;&gt;rlcj1992&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1230&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ Real amateurs; mostly women; mostly attractive&lt;br /&gt;
+ MILFs and hot 20-somethings&lt;br /&gt;
+ Some nasty content, to include mild BDSM and anal&lt;br /&gt;
+ Lots of downloads available, but (see below)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of downloads, but a lot of the vids are short in duration, and though you can piece some segments together, a few leave you hanging, wanting either the beginning or ending to appear at some point&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates are slow, sometimes one or two a month&lt;br /&gt;
- Long movie versions available only via mail order DVD; wish option for internet download was available&lt;br /&gt;
- Lighting and camerawork need some work, but for most part okay
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Satisfactory.  Some motivated and nasty amateurs, ready and willing to get it on, yet slow updates and too many of the movie downloads are short in duration and leave you wanting more on the beginning/end.  Quality is mostly good, though comparisons to early stuff shows they have progressed.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10753&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dixie's Trailer Park&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3067&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3067&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 08:47:15 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_1282</guid>
		<title>Dixie&#39;s Trailer Park Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1282</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dixiestrailerpark/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dixiestrailerpark.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Dixie's Trailer Park&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dixiestrailerpark/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Dixie's Trailer Park&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					02-03-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:42am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=509&quot;&gt;marquis58401&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=509&quot;&gt;23&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1.  Lots of content to download&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Quite a few full length movies&lt;br /&gt;
3.  Nice, true amateur feel&lt;br /&gt;
4.  True swinger/orgy sex featured
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					1.  Updates seemed really slow&lt;br /&gt;
2.  Little overpriced&lt;br /&gt;
3.  Organization of the site could be improved&lt;br /&gt;
4.  Full length videos were no longer being added
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					The best part about this site is the couple dozen or so full length hour long videos available for download.  Most of them are orgy type videos with several women taking on multiple men.  They are intense and very watchable.  The content includes lesbian, interracial, oral, anal, DP's, cum-eating, and so forth.  Unfortunately, their bitrate is limited to only 512k to keep the size down, making them watchable, but by no means high resolution.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The downside is that it appears the full length videos were no longer being updated at the time of my membership.  The only updates I saw were of smaller clips that I felt were not up to par with the full length videos.  Also, I thought the navigation was a little weird and could have been simplified for easier surfing. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a final disclaimer, I should add that the videos generally feature the same group of women and that the majority of them are middle aged being in their later 40's to mid 50's.  This didn't really bother me as these women truly seemed to have no sexual inhibitions, but others may want something featuring younger ladies. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bottom line is that I was really impressed with their full length videos.  The downside is that the rest of the site was somewhat lacking.  However, I still say that anyone who is a fan of the swinger/orgy genre or the mature genre should look at this site, give it a try for a month and download some great full length videos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=10753&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Dixie's Trailer Park&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=1282&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=1282&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:42:59 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_836</guid>
		<title>Watch Our Wives Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=836</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watchourwives/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watchourwives.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch Our Wives&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watchourwives/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch Our Wives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					01-22-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:10am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=215&quot;&gt;SurfingGuru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=215&quot;&gt;14&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+nice group and gangbang action on the sites that have content&lt;br /&gt;
+a true swinger site with 100% exclusive content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Video quality is low for todays amature site standards&lt;br /&gt;
+ older videos are even worse quality&lt;br /&gt;
+ there are only 2-3 wives on this sight that have a decent about of content.  The other 30 wives they have listed suck for content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I was a Trial member middle of last year.  As a first time member it appears to be alot of content.  But only from 2 or 3 of the Wives listed. If you like amature action of real swinger parties then this is a good site for you.  Even thou I gave negative comments on the Vid quality (mostly 300K)  some of the newer (500K) the videos were still clear enought to get off on the action.&lt;br /&gt;
I recently resigned back up (trail) and found that not much had updated since last year(8/2006).  Plus it seemed the updates were just repeated senarios.&lt;br /&gt;
I would have given it a lower score except the fack that they give you a full trail for $4.  I recomed to take the trail and a good download manager and get the videos.   Since I am not a picture guy, I can't elaborate for the pics on the site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6265&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch Our Wives&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=836&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=836&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:10:08 PST</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>