PU - Photography - New Reviews

Torrid Art Review

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:28:59 PST

Torrid Art (2)

11-24-08 04:28pm

REVIEW = 85 by roadie (6)

Pros:
As a photo lover I just had to try this site and was not disappointed. There are some great models. Natural Looks. No airbrushing you get the totally natural look blemishes and all.
HQ photos ranging from 600 - 4000px and rarely with an option below 3000px. Photos available as a zip option. Search options include jump to model, search by hair color, search by category though this feature could be extended. You also have the option to vote for fav models.

Cons:
The main downfall has to be the small number of updates. Last month was a total of 9 updates. Also total number of models is currently only 53 and they don't yet have large individual numbers of photo sets (on average 6 sets per model)with an average of 50 photos per set though some do go higher. The occasional photset is not quite to the standard you get used to on this site but it is the exception.

Bottom Line:
Bottom line is that for photo lovers wanting natural looking girls where the photos are HQ and not touched up like so many other sites then you have to give this at least a 1 month trial. Not everyone will appreciate the natural photos which includes the odd stretch mark or spot which is air brushed out on most other sites but personally I felt it added to the individuality of the models. They weren't the all too often waif like models all fully shaven. This was more the girl next door type and trims were more common than most sites which was a bonus for me. Finally price wise I felt that it was slightly overpriced given the small number of models / photo sets and updates but no regrets on joining and will probably revisit in about a year when they have more updates. Sooner if they were more frequent.

Visit Torrid Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Skokoff Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 20:46:25 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-22-08 08:46pm

REVIEW = 80 by Drooler (156)

Pros:
+Lots of attractive girls who probably sign their contracts in the Cyrillic alphabet.
+All-exclusive content.
+None of those blasted toys!
+Galleries updated every other day June-October 2008; daily in November.
+Pics in 3 sizes: small 1000px; medium 2500px, and large 3008 or 3872 or 4368px.
+All sizes of pics available à la carte or in zips.
+Nice, clean site design that is set up to be easy to use. (But see the cons ...)
+Extensive visitor�s area. You can see everything the site offers except for the gallery thumbs and full vids. And there are photo samples in all sizes.
+All videos in WMV (424x240), QT, and HD DivX (1280x720), which is the best, of course, with no choppiness.

Cons:
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X�s, not thumb pics. �X� occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
-There�s also the �swollen thumb� -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen �404� error page.
-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
-Oops! I�m a visitor! Some links in the members� area expose you to the public space. (Click �members� for re-entry with no additional login.)
-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit.

Bottom Line:
You might have heard of Skokov. That�s how it�s spelled at MetArt. Well, my friends, I did check the artist page there for material here that might qualify as �non-exclusive.� Fortunately, I found none.

The girls here are mostly very lovely. Some of the better-knowns are Lena, July (Sandra at MetArt, Judy at FemJoy), Katerina (Rina at MetModels, Cat at FemJoy), Vika (also at FemJoy), and Natasha, the ubiquitous Helena-Larissa-Nastya-Nata-Natalie. 53 models in all so far, that ain�t bad!

The photography is tasteful and professional. The settings suggest a certain opulence, yet it is not overdone. I just wish there was more brightness in more of the sets. And I do hope for more sets of July and Lena. There�s only 1 of each so far.

As I got into the site, I was thinking, �This is very smart. The clean design, the simple and easy navigation by models or by galleries ...� But then I started seeing the flaws, as noted in the cons. Somebody needs to get their act together and make sure that the thumbs work, and that they�re there to begin with.

And what�s with the watermark right above Katerina�s head in �Beautiful Red� 047.jpg? And in 080? To the left of her face in 035? And why is 053 missing both the thumb and the pics?

Well, in spite of its flaws, I�d still recommend this site to now-forewarned photo lovers. The pros outweigh the cons, even though the cons are annoying. And I�d say now is the time to fix that stuff, before the site gets any bigger.

Visit Skokoff - View Replies - Add Reply

DOMAI Review

Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:30:36 PST

DOMAI (3)

11-17-08 12:30am

REVIEW = 75 by lk2fireone (6)

Pros:
-Emphasizes simple, natural look for models. Models can be in a variety of environments (in a field, at the beach, in a house, wherever), but they are trying to appear normal girls, not artsy,
glamorous or exotic
-Small sized sets of many different models. Most photosets range from 20-50+ pictures
-Wide selection of photographers that contribute to this site
-Easy entrance to site for members
-Navigation fairly simple and direct
-Choice of 2 file sizes for most photosets to view or download
-Zip file downloading for photosets
-No download limits
-Has an index of contributing photographers. Under each photographer's name is listed the photosets he shot (with hotlinks to each photoset)
-Exclusive content. You will see many of the site models at other sites, but I've only seen 1 Domai
photoset of a model that was later posted at a different pay site.
Alinda has 1 photoset at Domai, and an expanded version of the photoset was posted at Amour Angels as model Alina, photoset named

Cons:
Pros (continued): "Wonderful Time".
Amour Angels has at least 3 models named Alina: The Alina I'm writing about is the blonde, slender girl with small breasts, waist-length hair, and a pretty face.

(Links to free low-res sample pictures of the model were removed due to pornusers guidelines.)

The girl is much more attractive at the higher resolution pictures at Domai and Amour Angels.

(If anyone has seen other photosets of this model, please let me know where, in a reply. I obviously like her.)

Cons:
-Photosets only. No videos. No live cams.
-Strictly single-model photosets. Softcore nudity. No boy-girl, girl-girl action.(They have a few
photosets where there are two girls together, but the girls are sitting/standing/lying together, not interacting sexually).
-The bonus features they offer are worthless: a newsletter, a few short stories.

Bottom Line:
Cons(continued):
-offers small number of short fictional stories by the site founder; useful to put yourself to sleep as an alternative to staring at your navel (as I get older, I find myself getting to be more snippety). Seriously, I find much more humor and enjoyment reading some of the reviews at pornusers
than reading the simple, love life-fellow-man-fellow-woman short stories of the site founder.
-Site newsletter is same style: love life and enjoy nudity and love your fellow man
-Site advertises 36,200 photos. You would think the site would have many more photos than that. The photosets are usually around 20-50+ pictures, and they average around 6 new sets a week recently. That would indicate well over 86,000 pictures because they've been around
since 1997. So why so few pictures listed?
-No bio data on the models
-No posting date listed on the photosets. You can find when the photoset was posted, but that takes
a little work: Have to search each yearly archive for the model's name, to see when that photoset was posted.
-Models are white European girls. Very few girls of other races.

Bottom line:
-On a cost-conscious basis, join for a trial or a 1 month membership, download all the files you want, then rejoin once a year for one month to update any new files.

-Or not rejoin, if you don't appreciate the photosets available at Domai.

Visit DOMAI - View Replies - Add Reply

Hegre Art Review

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:51:57 PST

Hegre Art (10)

11-15-08 10:51pm

REVIEW = 89 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-lots of pretty models
-good photography
-decent variety of models
-site has good layout

Cons:
-some models have few sets
-some models stuck in a shell
-some sets seem to focus on props/surrondings too much
- some vids grainy
-site is pricey

Bottom Line:
Hegre Art art is nice erotic art site they have alot of pretty models to look at here. There are also some large photo sizes.The photographic stlye of Peter is pretty good as well though it seems in some sets that he focuses more on the props/surrondings more than the model which may be why some models seem to be stuck in a shell that being said I prefer his outdoor sets much more than his indoor sets.Hegre Art oes have some user forums for photos and such though I did not use them. All in all Hegre Art is a good site the main reason for my score is due to the high cost of Hegre Art $39.95 is $10.00 above what several competing sites charge and I dont see anything that outshines the other sites to justify the extra cost.If the price were lower I'd give it a higher score.

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Glam Deluxe Review

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 15:11:58 PST

Glam Deluxe (2)

11-15-08 03:11pm

REVIEW = 75 by lk2fireone (6)

Pros:
-Some good-to-great looking models.
-Content is exclusive to this site.
-High-quality glamour photography.
-No DRM video protection.
-No download limit.
-They do have a bio sheet on the models. But some of the information is fantasy or worthless.

Giving the age of the model, with no date to compare the age to, is not much use. Stating in
"sexual experience" that a model is a virgin, when I have seen hardcore clips of the same model
giving blowjobs and having vaginal and anal sex with different males, makes me wonder what kind of
virginity they are talking about. The hardcore clips of this model were posted on other sites long before the photoshoots of this "virgin" model were posted at glamdeluxe.
I realize that I should not be picky about factoids when posted at a porn site, but it pricks the fantasy bubble when the factoids are so obviously false.

Cons:
-Site does not update very often. Can go a week or more before a new photoset is posted. Very irregular posting schedule for updates.
-Only 1 photographer for the site: Thierry Murrell. He does glamour-type erotic photography. Usually nice clean pictures, but if you don't like his style, you won't like the site.

-Softcore only. Single-model posing. No boy-girl pictures. No girl-on-girl pictures.

-Site advertises "huge archive" of photosets and flix. But the site has only been around since 2006, and the "archive" is tiny compared to a super-site like met-art. The flix archive is really small, only 28 videos. New videos are added very, very slowly.

-The flix (videos) are basically a video of a photoshoot. And some videos are a collection of
individual pictures from the photoshoot, not a real moving-picture video.

-No zip files for the photosets. Need a blackwidow program to download a photoset. Otherwise, you have to download each picture separately, a real pain.

Bottom Line:
Cons (continued):-Photosets are in 1 resolution only. Do not have a choice of 3 different resolutions for downloads as you have at some of the better sites like met-art (low, medium, high resolution).

-Navigation could be improved a lot.
You go to the flix (video) page, which lists with a thumbnail of each video at the site. The hot-
link to download each video is not clearly marked. Maybe this is a French version of a joke, where
increasing the obstacles means increased pleasure when you reach the goal of downloading the video?

-Videos are listed separate from the photosets. So if you want to find whatever videos there are of
a girl, have to look at the video page, then scroll down the page to examine each video to see
which girl it is. Videos are not grouped by the model, but apparently in random order.

-They do not date the videos or some of the older photosets. I like to know when the photosets and
videos were shot, for my own interest.

-Models are white girls from Europe only. No blacks, Asians, other races.

-Photos have a watermark. Doesn't bother me, but some people dislike photos with a prominent watermark.

Bottom line:
-If you like softcore, glamour shots of single models, and you like the models you see on the tour, then this site is maybe worth 1 single-month subscription to get the basic files you want, and then maybe a visit once a year to get any updates. Hopefully, the site will last, because the
photographer does do quality work and picks some nice-to-great looking models. But a regular
subscription beyond 1`month is not worth the money.

-I wish I could give this site a much higher score, because I belong to it and hope it does not go out of business. But for this type of softcore photography, you get more for your money with met-
art > metmodels > hegre-art.

Giving this site a 75, because some of the girls are gorgeous, and the pictures are high-quality glamour shots.

Visit Glam Deluxe - View Replies - Add Reply

MC Nudes Review

Sat, 15 Nov 2008 00:27:43 PST

MC Nudes (4)

11-15-08 12:27am

REVIEW = 88 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-has some very sexy models
-interesting layout for site
-good varitey of body types
-has an interesting comment feature at bottom of photoset/viedo page

Cons:
-as others have said seems to rely on a few models to keep a steady update stream
-site speed can be terriable
-some photosets just seem to lack "energy"

Bottom Line:
This site is great when its better parts show through but fizzles out a bit with its vices come through.(hey that rhymes ha ha) On the upside this site has some really hot models namely Gabrielle a very well endowed hour glass shaped slap yourself in the face and keep your dick from tearing a whole through your underwear goddess of a woman. There are several other nice girls as well. The photo sets that are good are some of the best errotic sets on the net. But then other sets they just dont seem to have good shots one area that they seem to really lack is the ass 'n tits type shot in other words a pic where you can see the models ass,back,shoulders and some boobs let me see the models curves from that angle there where many sets where you did not see this at all or only one pic or so.Another photo set issue is the lack of energy in some sets some of them just lack feeling and in errotic art you need to focus on body shape and model expression and some sets just seem to lack it. The other issue is that it seems that some models have tons of sets and others have few it seems like they use some models often to keep their updates at a regular basis. The site layout is pretty good and has a feature to change the back ground theme form grayish to a creamy color that is neat but it would be nice if there where a few more themes to choose from. The biggest issue is the sites speed it can be very slow at times I have downloaded vids from the site that where about 250-300mb and they took about 20-30 minutes to come in on other sites files of the same size normaly take 8-10 minutes. And at certin times of day the pages can take some time to load. I have a 1.5mbps connection so I adivse anyone who has a dialup connection to be aware that you may have trouble in this regard. Bottom line MC Nudes has great potential they just need to get a bit more consistant with their quality and really need to get some more servers to improve their sites speed a bit. I hope they improve in these areas if they do then MC Nudes would be one of the best errotic art sites on the net. This is a site that I will prob join again but not for at least 6 months to see if they have imporved or not.

Visit MC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:21:07 PST

Met Art (19)

11-14-08 01:21pm

REVIEW = 97 by lk2fireone (6)

Pros:
Best site on Internet for softcore European models.
Huge selection of models.
Many of the models are lovely/gorgeous/beautiful: really, some of the prettiest models I've seen on
any porn site.
Many different erotic photographers have contributed to the site.
Most models have multiple photosets.
Most photosets have 100+ pictures of the model.
The photosets are of very high quality (except some from the early years of the site).
With a membership, you get a large number of hours of live webcams per day.

For years they have been posting 3-4 new photosets per day. That is a huge number of updates.
They are constantly coming out with new models, as well as with new photosets of older models(not in age, but as in previously viewed models).
Most models appear to be in their late teens or early 20s.There are many different physical types of European girls: breast size: small, medium, large. Most girls slender, some medium, a few large (not heavy, just big beautiful girls).

Cons:
Met-art has made an art of posting boring videos of beautiful young girls.
Sorry, but that disappoints me.
The videos are a very minor extra, hardly worth watching.
The models are almost all European. There are very few Asian or African or others. To see other types of models, go to a different site.
This is softcore only. If you are looking for hardcore, go elsewhere. No boy-girl sex. No boys at all. A little girl-girl touching, but so mild you wonder why they bother.
Met-art has a posted schedule for the livecam shows. If a model does not appear for her show, you don't find out about the change until you are waiting for the model to appear live, and maybe there is a replacement model, or maybe no show at all.
The same model can have different names. This is a porn problem, but why can't they give a girl a name and remember it?
Search feature for model sets is OK, but could be easier to use.

Bottom Line:
If you like soft-core pictures of beautiful European girls, this is the site to join. The annual fee of $99 is a bargain.

This site (in my opinion) offers, for the same or less money, so much more than competing sites such as:
metmodels: (a sister site to met-art) that has fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets.
hegre-art: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No livecams. No variety of photographers. And is more expensive than met-art.
domai: a nice softcore site, but again: fewer updates and fewer models and fewer photosets. No
livecams. And the photosets do not have the great quality of the met-art sets.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Models Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:19:25 PST

Met Models (3)

11-13-08 08:19pm

REVIEW = 80 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-has some nice girls
-pretty much like MET-ART lite
-has more of some models that MET-ART dosent use much

Cons:
-pretty much MET-ART lite
-poorly up set model search
-some sets seem "average"
-not worth getting alone as sister site MET-ART is a better site only for MET-ARt mega fans really

Bottom Line:
This is a tricky site to review. In some ways it seems that MET-Models is like a "farm" site for MET-ART. Sort of like they use sets that they werent sure would do well on MET-ART I guess.Some models have more sets on MEt Models than they do on MET-ART. And some artists have more sets on MET Models.That being said one of the issues I have is model search as it will list all models with that same first name rather than only the model with the exact name. I guess ultimatly I'd suggest this site if you really like MET-ART and want some more or if you you are signing up for one of MET-ARTs combo deals that let you get Errotcia Archives and MET Models all together.But if you are not a member of MET-ART and are thinking of joining only MET-ART or MET Models then dont even waste your time with MET Models get MET-ART. This is the reason that I gave an 80 MEt Models is a Cessna when MET-ART is an Airbus.

Visit Met Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Errotica Archives Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:53:37 PST

Errotica Archives (4)

11-13-08 07:53pm

REVIEW = 90 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-several hot models
-decent viedos
-good layout
-seems to be improving style lately
-great site if you are into Czech women or Slovakian women
-most models shave pussy(may be a con to some)

Cons:
-sometimes goes a few days before model you like has new set
-some vids average
-vids are short
-pay attention to site cost if you get the monthly fee but keep the account open for over 60 days your ripping yourself off get a 90 or 365 day membership it is much cheaper.
-usualy updates with one set or viedo a day but not always
-some viedos good some are not so good
-some sets focus too much on feet/legs(could be a pro to some)

Bottom Line:
Overal Id say that Errotica Archives is a pretty good site. There are many pretty models most are from the Czech Republic or from Slovikia and there is a good range from skinny to large breasted girls here some do have tattoos on their buts or too large of ones on the back(I always hate Tats on those areas I feel that they break a womans form)Also be aware that all the sets are done by one artist ERRO so be sure that you like his style before you make a comitment.That being said ERRO has several models that I became a fan of on MET-ART namely Eufrat(I know she uses others names but they escape me at this time) and Erro's errotic sets of Eufrat are the best ones that you will see in the softcore range.Erro also seems to focus on a models feet and pussy region(though there is no hardcore style spreading mainly "cameltoe" type of shots) For the vids they are softcore but in some the model will rub herself which is not bad. But other vids are just recodings of photo sets though in some the models talk and joke around so thats nice to see sometimes.Another plus to me is that there are several pretty well known Czech porn stars on Errotica Archives Simi(goes by Perla here),Angel(Angela Dark),Eufrat are some that come to mind so if you want to see the girls in a more errotic setting then Errotica Archives is a good choice. Pretty good site here If you like what you see in the tour then it is worth a try.As with other errotic art sites keep in mind that it is "art" so if your are looking for masturbation or anything harder then dont sign up for an errotic art site or you will dissiapointed.

Visit Errotica Archives - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Thu, 13 Nov 2008 13:37:23 PST

Met Art (19)

11-13-08 01:37pm

REVIEW = 97 by hondaman (7)

Pros:
-outstanding model selection
-large amount of photographers
-models from many diffrent countries
-very good updates(normaly 4 or 5 sets each day)
-site has been doing very good with viedos lately
-no download limits
-photo sets average around 140 pics often more
-models often dont start off nude which makes sets more interesting
-some sets have very artistic look
-most sets have many good shots of the model from various angles
-there is now model info got added sometime in 2008
-huge ammount of pictures something around 600,000 total!
-good amount of models of diffrent bulids, skinny,large breasted,many diffrent skin tones, many models have very nice butts
-for me the site has very fast servers and I have used it on dial-up as well as DSL connections

Cons:
-not all models have a bio yet
-due to there being so many models one that you like may not appear very often
-site layout can be confusing at first
-some viedos are filmed photosets
-cost of site much higher if you pay the monthly cost of $29.95 or $359.40 after a year compared to $99.00 for a year or $8.25 a month.

Bottom Line:
I feel that MET-ART is the best errotic art site on the net. It has the most to offer over any other simular site namely in sheer number of models and cost(if you pay the $99.00 yearly fee).I have been a member of FEMJOY,DOMAI,HeargeArt,and MC Nudes. All of these sites are very good as well but MET-ART is the one that keeps me most happy.AS I said in the cons the site can be a little confusing layout wise but to me its not really a big deal because MET-ART provides what I really like(errotic art) in spades.Another con would be that some viedos are just filmed photosets though I think this is more the artists choice than the sites saying. One artist GONCHAROV has outstanding films that are purely films and there is no camera(photographic)work going on the model is simply moving around as GONCHAROV films. Another con is that sometimes a model may only pose one time and never appear in another set however this quite rare and there are so many models that you are likely to have many favorites and most likely there will be a model that you enjoy pretty much everyday.I see that some people con the site for lacking masturbation ect. I dont agree with this it is not the aim of the site.Masturbation is more like true pornagraphy while MET-ART is errotic art to me those are two diffrent things.This site is for the person with a "sensual" eye one that is most pleased by the female form but not by a direct sexual act. The number one con to me is the pricing. The basic monthly fee adds up to $359.40 if you kept the account open for a year. It is best to try the site for a month and if you like it buy the $99.00 full year fee which ends up being $8.25 a month or the 90 day fee which is cheaper than paying the monthly fee at a higher price for the same timespan. My best advice is to try several errotic sites and find the one that most satisfiies your personal taste. That way you have tried some that you think you like and pick the best one much like when you buy a new car test drive.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

DDF Beauties Review

Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:55:24 PST

DDF Beauties (1)

11-08-08 01:55am

REVIEW = 70 by Drooler (156)

Pros:
+That DDF image and video quality, as always
+Collection updated daily since the faux start date of January 1st, 2008. (TBP lists the launch date as �Oct. 2008, approx.�)
+Niche links to b/g hardcore (33 sets), lesbian (64 sets), or toys content. �Beautiful Babes� is semi-redundant as it includes lesbian.
+Monthly calendar layout is simpler and more straightforward than 1byday�s
+3 image size choices: 800, 1200, or 2000 pixels
+Image viewing a bit better than at 1byday: You can click the three size choices under each thumb instead of in the image popup window.
+Videos in 1280x720 (wmv and divX), 852x480 (wmv), 960x540 (QT), and 720x405 (Flash stream). Also available are 448x256 mpg segments.
+Fast downloads: 2-3 Mbps on vids; galleries in a few seconds
+�Babe Finder� may help those who, for example, prefer blonds with medium-sized tits doing hardcore
+Visitors can buy only the sets they want for $2.50 each, though a one-month membership is obviously a better deal

Cons:
-Very little that�s new to DDF. If you�ve been a member of 1byday, you�ve seen most of this already. This is the biggest minus for sure.
-Limited navigation. Can�t browse galleries with thumbs all on one page; can�t jump ahead to final or other page. Makes for tedious browsing by model. (Must click �Model List� then the first initial then the model�s thumb to return to her.)
-Zip downloads of one size: 2000px. (Could be worse.)
-From the niche links, you get thumbs not with the model names, but instead with the vanilla-flavored titles such as �Sapphic Fornication,� �Sapphic Obligation,� and �Sapphic Recreation.�
-Thumbnail images of only the girl sometimes which, if you�re browsing from the calendars or the model list, don�t indicate that the gallery/video content is actually lesbian or hardcore. The titles don�t always help, either.
-�Coming Soon� might as well be called �Coming Next.� That�s all it is.
-Cancellation not set up for this site. Had to request by ticket.

Bottom Line:
I don�t get it. Why are they offering this site? It�s basically just a smaller-sized clone of 1byday, albeit at a more affordable price.

Still, I�d think it would have made more sense to offer something they haven�t done before: Spanking new content of beautiful women without the hardcore, lesbian or toy activities. (I didn�t mean that there should be spanking in it.)

Another alternative would have been to offer their �reloaded� content all on one site. There�s still a big backlog of that. And that way those who wanted it could get it (I would), while those who didn�t wouldn�t be dissatisfied -- as I know some PornUsers have been with 1byday.

At least the design here is cleaner, clearer, less confusing, and frankly more attractive than 1byday, which takes a little getting used to.

Yet I would only recommend this site to a PornUser who has never joined 1byday and probably never will. At $24.95, it would be a good deal.

For them, the review score would be 90. For the DDF-experienced, it would be a 50 because it offers practically nothing that is new. So to be fair, 90-50 = 40. 40/2 = 20. 20+50 = 70.

Finally, when I tried to cancel, which you can only do through the site, I went through a maze of pages only to find that it wouldn't work because they lead to the cancellation page of a different site! So I had to create a "ticket" to send to support. Fortunately, cancellation was completed within 24 hours.

Visit DDF Beauties - View Replies - Add Reply

1 By Day Review

Thu, 06 Nov 2008 07:47:44 PST

1 By Day (22)

11-06-08 07:47am

REVIEW = 95 by xbigvmanx (10)

Pros:
Huge Library of Photos and Videos
Beautiful Eastern European models
Easy Navigation
zip files
Movies up to 300+ MB HD quality

Cons:
Old archive movies that need to be upgraded

Bottom Line:
I decided to subscribe to 1by-day website for several reasons, 1. It was highly recommended by other websites, 2. Quality 3. Content 4. Has a large archive of my favorite models on there 5. You can't go wrong when DDF productions is name is on it. You would recognize DDF productions in a lot of their movies from New Sensations DVD and Digital Sin DVDs. The majority of the Movies are in HD.wmv there are 3 different formats which are .mov .wmv .mpg and streaming. The photos are in high resolution quality and all are one conveint zip file. The content of this website so massive it would take much of your time to download every pic and movie. You would to spend over two months with a fast internet connection to download every thing. My one complaint to this website are their old archive. I thought it should be upgraded to better formats. Their old archive movies are somewhat a little grainy and are in either .wmv and most are .avi It has a mixture of lesbian, masturbation and hardcore action.This is a great website worth subscribing I recommend to anyone.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

Ron Harris Review

Thu, 06 Nov 2008 06:25:15 PST

Ron Harris (6)

11-06-08 06:25am

REVIEW = 73 by Jeffrey99 (11)

Pros:
+High quality photos.
+Good quality vidoes with closeups of girls during orgasm.

Cons:
-Pricey $$$ for a month to month. Gets better if you pay for 2 months at once.
-Blair Witch porn. Dude has problems keeping camera still.
-Can't seem to decide if he wants to focus on her face or pussy. So in turn you get the top of her mouth in the upper left corner and the top of her pussy in the bottom right. So in turn your pretty much looking at her belly.
-One of those great camerman who won't shut the F up.
-Not updated enough and he seems to have gotten stuck on shooting 3-4 certain models

Bottom Line:
My biggest poroblem with Ron Harris Studio is his video work. He seems to not be able to decide what he wants to focus on. So in turn you end up focusing on her belly most of the time. He also has a really hard time keeping camera still. Not sure if he's trying to jack it while taping them or what but it makes Blair Witch or Cloverfield look they were taped on a tripod. On top of that, he doesn't know when to shut up.

It seems from looking at the updates that he's starting focusing on a certin 3-4 models. And even with that, there just aren't enough updates.

Overall every once in a while I'd come across a video that he'd be less jerky and keep it focused down below for the big O. But that seemed to be few and far between.

EDIT:As for the videos they are available in 720p and 1080p to download. I've never had problems playing hd videos on my pc but the 1080p wouldn't play on my machine. Quality was good for the 720p if you could get past the stuff I said in my review. As for how many, just depended on the model. Some like his main girl Kara(who he shoots alot compared to everyone else) had probably 10-12, while most girls had 2-3.

While the videos look great, I couldn't get past the jerky cam, bad zoom and him talking all the time.

Visit Ron Harris - View Replies - Add Reply

FEMJOY Review

Tue, 04 Nov 2008 06:00:54 PST

FEMJOY (7)

11-04-08 06:00am

REVIEW = 82 by Jeffrey99 (11)

Pros:
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models

Cons:
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them.

Bottom Line:
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.

While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.

The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.

Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy.

Visit FEMJOY - View Replies - Add Reply

FTV Girls Review

Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:36:11 PDT

FTV Girls (27)

10-30-08 08:36pm

REVIEW = 94 by nygiants03 (156)

Pros:
- Beautiful selection of young models
- High quality pictures (1600px × 1064px latest)
- Over an hour with each model
- Very intimate videos � Real Orgasms
- Huge selection ( cant count)
- 64 HD videos ( incredible quality)
- Exhibitionism
- Girls are able to be themselves
- Crazy Insertions for those with fetish
- Appealing site design

Cons:
-Full scene with every part combined would be nice
-Old stuff isn�t digitally enhanced, and quality lacks slightly
-The HD videos take forever to download
-No boy/girl sex
-Search features are limited to model
-no forum for interaction with any model
-updates are usually around once a week

Bottom Line:
Ah FTV girls, one of my very first reviews. This site is still my number one site after all this time. You get real girls who send in their amateur pics and FTV pays them to get off and be natural. Obviously not all are amateur, but there are some girls who are only found on this site. Love the fact there is not to many fake boobs, or famous porn stars. There are not to many other sites where you get to see a girl truly orgasm and enjoy herself on tape. You even get close ups of the girls juices flowing. The videos are genuine and real as they get and the quality is extraordinary. Each girl�s personality really shines in each video, and you get to see every inch of the girl. Sometimes you get some kinky stuff like speculums, gigantic dildos, fisting, and pregnant woman(HOT). You can literally download all the HD videos from the site and make a DVD collection which is worth WAY more than the monthly asking price. The site is gigantic; it would take months to download everything on this site. If you never joined this site then you have seriously been missing out even if hardcore is your thing. This site is about enjoying the beauty and eroticism of woman at its best. I know some people say the material is repetitive but so is most hardcore sites material. If you�re looking for the kinky masturbation stuff, this is the the best site. I�m leaving my previous score of 94, because even though FTV improved so did some of the other similar sites.

Visit FTV Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

1 By Day Review

Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:33:57 PDT

1 By Day (22)

10-09-08 03:33pm

REVIEW = 82 by pinkerton (17)

Pros:
Quality hi-def videos and photo sets.
Beautiful girls.
Fast downloads and works with my favourite DL manager.
Good navigation and organisation.
Girls on all sorts of machines.
Frequent updates.
Cool Iris support is very neat.

Cons:
Not enough hardcore - site is mostly solo girl and girl-on-girl.
Hardcore content is same as on Hands on Hardcore, another DDF site so if you want just hardcore, you'd best give this site a miss.
Expensive for what's on offer.
Some old content is remastered, which in some cases is good, but it means less new content.

Bottom Line:
For hardcore, I couldn't really recommend this site - after membership of Hands on Hardcore I was curious to see what this partner site had to offer and found myself somewhat disappointed.
If you're really into the girls then this site offers plenty of information, casting videos and Flash castings (something unique to this site).
Being able to browse photosets using CoolIris is a bonus, though I couldn't get it working in IE, just Firefox.
If you love girls with toys, solo girls and girl-on-girl action, then you'll love this site, but for pure hardcore girl-on-guy(s) action, stick with Hands on Hardcore.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

Simon Scans Review

Mon, 06 Oct 2008 12:03:38 PDT

Simon Scans (9)

10-06-08 12:03pm

REVIEW = 98 by Jigglypuff (1)

Pros:
1. All Exclusive content. You won't see it on ANY other site. New content is added almost daily.
2. Stunning image quality, really has to be seen to be believed. Currently there are 589 models appearing in 3734 sets for a total of over 429,000+ images to browse.
3. Super fast download speeds for both images and movies. Multiple high quality movie formats - WMV/MPG/MOV/FLV at impressive bitrates (and NO DRM!).
4. Make no mistake, this truly is a benchmark solo-girl site by which all others of a similar niche should be judged.
5. Membership costs. If you're a fan of solo-girl sites like myself, the value for money this site represents is truly amazing. An absolute BARGAIN.

Cons:
Small quibble with the video's (See Bottom Line)

Bottom Line:
Make no mistake folks, this is a gem of a site. As I said in my PRO's section above you really do need to check out the quality of the content on SimonScans.com and then take a look at 99% of other sites in the same niche to appreciate just how good it really is. One of the few (very few!) sites that really does make you go "Wow!".

Onto the site itself. It's quick to load and I personally found it a breeze to browse around and getting to sections of the site I go to frequently is easy. Granted, I have been a member for quite some time now, but I honestly believe you'll have no problems at all using SimonScans.com and everything just has that 'SimonScans' feel to it. If that makes sense? If you become a member (and you should!) you'll understand exactly what I mean :)

The reason I don't give this site 100/100 is that I agree with others that have said some of the older videos are of not such good quality. But then I think I'm judging them against the latest SimonScans video quality and maybe thats me just being overly picky. The latest videos (over the last 6 months) are very good indeed, so maybe I'am being overly-critical on this point.

To sum it up, this is a fantastic site. It hits its' niche bang on and all in glorious Hi-Res quality. Check it out today, you won't regret it for a second.

Visit Simon Scans - View Replies - Add Reply

1 By Day Review

Sat, 04 Oct 2008 05:35:59 PDT

1 By Day (22)

10-04-08 05:35am

REVIEW = 70 by DigglerFL (14)

Pros:
- Great Quality
- Unique Content
- Not your typical Scenese
- Fast Downloads

Cons:
- Hardly any hardcore
- Ridiculously bad navigation
- Too much weird stuff

Bottom Line:
Basically, this is an overpriced masturbation site with a sprinkling of hardcore. If you're into good looking women sticking ax handles and gun barrels into themselves then you'll probably give this a better score than me. But in one full week, there was not one new hardcore scene. There's just not enough desirable content to justify the high price.

I'm did this review 1 week into the subscription, and now I'm updating at the end. At this point I feel that this site was a complete waste of money. After pouring throught the archives, there are perhaps only 4 scenes I'd consider exceptional. Way overpriced for 80% masturbation.

I'm editing this again. I created a yahoo mail account just for this purchase. I went in to view my receipt and the mailbox is filled with porn spam. So do not give your real email to these people.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

FEMJOY Review

Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:44:59 PDT

FEMJOY (7)

10-01-08 12:44am

REVIEW = 85 by asmith12 (86)

Pros:
+++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen)

Cons:
-- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search

Bottom Line:
After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.

But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.

Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.

Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt.

Visit FEMJOY - View Replies - Add Reply

True Amateur Models Review

Tue, 30 Sep 2008 10:21:01 PDT

True Amateur Models (1)

09-30-08 10:21am

REVIEW = 85 by Bret (1)

Pros:
#1. 100% Exclusive content of REAL amateur girls. These are not pro models that are pretending to be amateur like so many other "amateur" sites display. These are very real and very amateur girls.

#2. Very high quality content. The content on True Amateur Models is easily one of the best and highest quality content of adult websites.

#3. LOADS of exclusive photo galleries. As of my last count, there are around 500 galleries with nearly 400 to 600 photos in each gallery.

#4. Very big photos. Photos enlarge to 1600x1200....which is very big and takes up my entire monitor screen.

#5. The positions that the girls get into are very raunchy and explicit. True Amateur Models is not one of thos "erotic" modeling websites but rather a website that specializes in all types of very explicit poses. Sure, there are erotic poses that the girls get into but for the most part, the modeling is very explicit. Lots of upclose shots.

#6. Weekly Updates.

#7. Softcore and Hardcore

Cons:
#1. Not many videos. This is a photography based site for the most part. However, according to the site owner, more videos will be recorded and will be added to the site. As of now, there are about 15 exclusive videos but I am sure that number will grow to be much higher as time goes on.

Bottom Line:
True Amateur Models is definatly a site that you should consider signing up wih if you are a fan of real amateur girls. There is softcore AND hardcore content on the site. As I mentioned above, the content is very hyigh quality, the updates are frequent, the girls are REAL amateur girls, the photos are BIG, there is LOADS of content on the site and all of it is very exclusive. In fact, I would even be willing to say that True Amateur Models is the BEST amateur site on the internet. It's the best that I have ever signed up with and believe me, I have signed up with loads of them. Thank you for reading my review and if you like REAL amateur girls then you will love True Amateur Models.

Visit True Amateur Models - View Replies - Add Reply

1 By Day Review

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:10:44 PDT

1 By Day (22)

09-29-08 12:10pm

REVIEW = 93 by Cybertoad (58)

Pros:
Hardcore, Lez, Solo many Niches
Huge Site, no DL Limit
Great Search Engine
Video HD and HD Photos Varied Size
26,000 + not a mis-type Videos
No DRM, Updates Daily
Good Download West Coast 500-700k
Videos 4000k ( wow) 1280x720
Stunning Models Awsome / Unique Scenes
Good Navigation.
Many Formats, to many to list.
Slide Shows
33,000+ Pics ( Plus Zipped )
Download Mangers work well.
Looks To Have Daily Updates.

Cons:
Some Models Only 1 or Two Scenes
Site Design is Good But Intense
No Live Shows ( not really a con)
Downloads speed good not great.
Very High Price.
Lacked specific niche navigation unless searched.

Bottom Line:
Many reviews all over the net rate this site high.
I wondered why, I joined and stop asking.
This site is awesome, mostly because of the awesome models the scenes are hot.
And thank you thank you for not having guys talk through out the whole thing.
( who ever thought this was a good idea in other sites should be shot)
So what I often do not see in the reviews is negatives on this site, the site is so good
that one wonders where it falls short if any.

My only complaints are, that I will find a hot model, and I think ok here we go only to find just one scene to her. That's repetitive in the site and site where you find only one or two scenes of a stunning model. There are 10's of thousands of Videos more then I could even begin to download. This is one site I will be picky and pick what I like not just horde it. They are that stunning you will fin lots to admire.

The sad thing is this sites cost is high very high , and its going to be a one time joining for
me I can not afford that kinda cost.
The Navigation why simple , is intense, there is one flaw I saw that was annoying.
You must search for a niche rather then click a niche button, that's ok but often didn't reveal all scenes.
Other additional sites are available at a huge cost as well. This network would be rich if they lowered the price.

Cybertoads take, I rated it a 93, its a great site meets and exceed your fantasy and has a
incredible search engine for niches, but not 100% accurate more like 90% accurate.
The site navigation is good but intense because you have to travel through many areas.
Must be hard on a site this huge but wish there was a better way to do it.
Join yes, stay maybe not price is just a factor. I tried not to let it not influence my review.
If I had it would have been a 85 its just to much.

You will enjoy the site after you stop crying after thunking down $34.95 ( like 5cents makes a difference here its 35.00 . But you will enjoy

I loved the site but there was one or two short falls I didnt read elsewhere and why this is a awsome site I felt was important to give a all around review.

Cybertoad

Added / 10/3/08
Just finished downloading the entire site.
A: it was done flawlessly, using Downloadmananger
B: The quality is very good on 90% or more of the videos. More Girls then guys and no talking really by guys. A new update every day and are videos. Some very hardcore solos, Lez scenes too.
Just sharing the info, enjoy.

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

Met Art Review

Mon, 29 Sep 2008 05:34:20 PDT

Met Art (19)

09-29-08 05:34am

REVIEW = 85 by asmith12 (86)

Pros:
+++ beautiful locations
+++ VARIETY of beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ professional photography
++ variety of outfits
++ free cam
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ convenient navigation

Cons:
-- too much difference between cover page and gallery contents (see explanation below)
-- mood of some models can be better
-- movies are just recording of photoshoots
- resolution selection is not preserved
- obsession with bandwidth for movies (6Mbit/sec WMV is too much for me)
- lack of search

Bottom Line:
I've decided to join Met-Arts mostly because of cover pages of their daily issues, and those are pieces of art, really. But what really surprised and quite disappointed me was that inside their galleries feel quite different from the cover page. Met-Art doesn't "cheat", and "cover" is from the same gallery, but overall feeling is still VERY different. Sure, everybody selects the very best shot for cover page, but IMHO Met-Arts kind of contrast between cover and gallery itself is unusual both for paper magazines and web sites. Fortunately, Met Art has archives and IMHO back in 2006 and earlier this difference WASN'T THAT BIG. In general, I liked old galleries MUCH better. It's both good and bad to know, as on one hand, it means I can find galleries I like more, on the other hand, means that quality of Met-Art galleries (from my subjective perspective) goes downhill :-(.

Another thing that bothered me (and which isn't present on "covers") is mood of the girls. Granted, they're REALLY beautiful, but it is quite clear from the pictures (and videos) that most of them are just doing pretty boring job; I don't mind what they really think, but when it becomes obvious on the picture, then IMHO something is wrong. And again, this wasn't that much of a problem as late as in 2007.

In addition, I shall say that I'm not fond of picture sizes like 3328x4992: I never print such pictures, I don't have monitor that large, and don't think I will ever get one in foreseeable future (monitor with 4992 HEIGHT? even if such a beast exists, I'm afraid even to think how much it costs). I obviously don't mind about such pictures as long as Met-Arts provides lower resolutions, but I don't consider such HUGE pictures as an advantage too. But one thing calls for improvement, and it is that if I've selected "Mid-Res" once, then ALL the galleries shall start to be shown as "Mid-Res" (now they still default to "Hi-Res").

Bottom line: Met Art is one of VERY few sites on the Net with potential to make erotic ART, but unfortunately it (IMHO) doesn't realize this potential. Also I had a pretty hard time rating it, so to do it, I've compared how much I enjoy it with another softcore site I've recently joined - VirtuaGirlHD (I know it's apples and oranges, but I don't have any better reference). And IMHO MetArt's old galleries are about on par with VirtuaGirlHD (88), and recent ones are significantly lower, about 82, so I've took average (85) as an overall rating.

Visit Met Art - View Replies - Add Reply

MC Nudes Review

Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:55:09 PDT

MC Nudes (4)

09-26-08 04:55pm

REVIEW = 82 by pjfry (2)

Pros:
- Beautiful models
- Daily updates
- Photosets are zipped and DL quickly (they claim to have technology that accelerates downloads. I can't verify, I use a download manager anyway).
- Artsy and erotic photo shoots
- Very high res pictures (more recent updates are usually around 4-5000px, earlier updates are usually in the 1-3000px range)
- Resolution options on photosets (smaller zips range from about 1 - 5MB in size if space is a concern)
- Classy softcore (no intense masturbation, extreme closeups, gaping, etc.) This is definitely a pro if that's what you're looking for. I've signed up for sites before only to find it wasn't what I expected.
- High def videos
- Easy to navigate
- Nice site design

Cons:
- Not a huge variety of models. The site relies on regulars to maintain daily updates (a few models have dozens and dozens, the rest only a few).
- Not many videos
- Sets can be repetitive after awhile

Bottom Line:
If you're looking for gorgeous softcore models, I recommend MC Nudes. The models are very attractive, and the photosets are artsy and erotic. It stands out from other softcore sites in that the models are classy. Many softcore sites offer the same thing: Women with way too much makeup in pornstar/stripper outfits (not that that's necessarily bad, but it can get old). Also, if you like your softcore soft, this site is also for you. As mentioned above, no extreme closeups, gaping, massive toys (none at all as I recall actually), or similar.

Visit MC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

MPL Studios Review

Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:22:39 PDT

MPL Studios (5)

09-21-08 08:22am

REVIEW = 92 by Mr Fountain (28)

Pros:
# I would say a top five site for their vid collection; and some of the most beautifully photographed shoots that you'll see...
# Mpl Studios photos come through very sharp; very crisp; no loss of sharpness even at 2000 x 3000- even down to a bead of water on the models skin!
#pics come in 800 x 1200; 1200 x 800;1333 X 2000 pixels; 2000 x 1333 pixels; 2000 x 3000; 3000 x 2000 pixels and in these zips: 1200 Zip Folder 24.4 mb
2000 Zip Folder 48.5 mb
3000 Zip Folder 76.4 mb

#offers hi def vids..some of the most erotic vids..I'd put them in the top three sites for their vids... must see for vid lovers..
#hi resolution downloads:1280x720; Download wmv (272 mb); Download avi (265 mb); Download mov (190 mb; and low resolution downloads:
Play Windows wmv 498x280 (95 mb)
Download iPod m4v 320x240 (31 mb)- also DIvX
# includes lifestyle series; behind the scenes shoots for each model
# access to Anya's portfolio--- enough material for her own site--she just took my breath away..

Cons:
# Mpl studios mostly offers nude, and or fashion style photography (behind the scenes, lifetyle, postcards from the edge); softcore shoots though-are left to be desired. As a member, I would like to see more models in sexy evening dresses and lingerie (although they do show models in swimsuits)
#the navigation --- twenty models avatars at a time fill the screen--though you can click their name on the left hand side..
# sometimes the shoots include too much backgound
# Mpl studios uses dramatic lighting in some shoots that casts shadows that interfere with detail on the model..
# its often real cold in St Petersburg year round..so a lot of the lifestyle shoots the models are bundled up in sweat suits and jumpers..
# lifestyle sets are often series showing the model reading, looking out the window, or sipping on some coffee.. you will have to be a fan of fashion photography to enjoy these sets..
# older sets don't include 3000 resolution.
# $34.95 monthly price

Bottom Line:
IF you like nudes, and really demand ultra sharp photos. Mpl studios is the nude site is the go-to site for this type. There is not a lot of softened light shooting as the other nude sites as Mpl studios likes dramatic lighting in some of their sets. But the non softened light makes for hi rez photos...

I am a member of two nude sites this month and I am overwhelmed with the sheer amount of material... Mpl has a lot of material.. and I haven' gotten throuhg %20 of it yet...

Mpl studios is also a great site for ultra sharp vids; freeze frames from these vids could pass as hi rez photos! Their is lesbian action, models walking on the beach, or primping for you in sexy lingerie. These are some of the most erotic vids...They have about 14 masterbation vids ans well as 18 behind the scenes, and interview vids..

MPls Studios vids are great... I would put them in the top five vid sites-- though they are not the top one or two--but probably third due to their realtively small collection size (concerning the ones in HDTV)....but these are a great collection of vids that vid lovers should not deprive themselves of..the non HDTV are still hi rez..If you have hi speed, then go for it..

Before joining, I read through MPL's tour and they kept pushing had this model named Anya. I did'nt know why they didn't just focus on other models. But once I joined I went to her portfolio first...the photography is top notch.. well framed and composed.. and Anya..man she is the nude model of nude models...she made me gasp when I looked at her walking along the beach in one of her photoshoots..before I knew it..Anya had me blowing my rocks off to her portfolio two times the first day. I guess you could say am a believer in Anya and nude lovers should see a portfolio such as hers.. I haven't been through her massive collection yet..I also like Maria's protfolio..and Lilya's, Alisa's... I definately would say that I need severla months to go through their selection..Like I said I am a member of two nude sites this month and their is just no time for it all...

Mpl studios currently offers 28 in HDTV and 110 vids in hi rez. Russia: about 160 models;London: 6 models; Budapest: 7 models; Prague: 6 models.
Anya has 100 photoshoots 50-60 pics each..

I would recomend Mpl studios for membership. I would say that Mpl is a nude site worth looking into if you are a nude lover..

Visit MPL Studios - View Replies - Add Reply

Beauty Is Divine Review

Tue, 09 Sep 2008 04:33:42 PDT

Beauty Is Divine (1)

09-09-08 04:33am

REVIEW = 68 by Drooler (156)

Pros:
+High quality, professional photography
+Exclusive content
+Speedy server
+Mix of Euro, Latina, and American babes
+Some hot �name� babes: Georgia Jones, Heather Carolin (as �Scarlett�), Alexis Love, Sasha Grey, Franziska, Lexi Belle, Klara/Zoe, Nella (Jana Miartusova)
+Some hot �lesser knowns� and unknowns
+Zips. The most recent 24 photosets in 1200, 2000, and 4000px. But see the cons.
+Nice thumbnail sizes (277x417).
+Simple, clear, attractive design, but note the cons.
+�Showcase� tells you some things about the photographer and his work.

Cons:
-Only about 98 photosets to date
-Updates about 1x per week.
-Photosets accessed from one LONG, SCROLLING page.
-Average number of pics per set is 23 in the ten most recent photosets.
-A few photosets have < 10 pics.
-Approach to zips is inconsistent. Most zips are �hi� (2000px) and �low� (1200 px), but a few photosets have only one zip size (e.g., 1200x800, called �medium� then!).
-Inconsistent approach to single files. Most have the hi and low, but the most recent have only 2000px as singles.
-Artistic approach means black & white photos either mixed with color ones in a gallery or all B&W (15 to date; a bit over 15%)
-Many photosets are purely artistic objectifications; the stuff of exhibition halls, not a horndog�s hard drive. In fact, some of them don�t even give the model�s name anywhere.
-However, pussy probing with toys has shown up, too.
-�Bonus� features is just two more galleries, and boring.
-No videos

Bottom Line:
The site shows signs of improvement with the expansion of zip files. There�s been a bit more pink added just lately, too, such as Heather Carolin�s fun with a big toy.

These things, however, are all that might conceivably interest a PornUser who also likes nude photography. Other than that, I think an actual photographer or perhaps another kind of visual artist would find a membership to this site more gratifying.

This is not to say that some of the girls don�t look nice here, but there aren�t enough photos to take you very �far� into a fantasy. Evidently, it�s not the point of the site.

But what of the future? Seems that the site might be undergoing an identity crisis -- one of �art� vs. �porn,� to put it simply. It has the potential: a skilled and creative photographer, a fast server, and simple web design that wouldn�t take too much fixing to make it more user-friendly (more gallery pages and less scrolling).

If the resolution is in the �porn� direction, that could mean larger photosets, and more fulfillment of user fantasies. And obviously, more frequent updates for that $20 price tag.

If it isn�t, though, the site will remain on the periphery of what PornUsers is all about. It will be art that just sticks a toe or two into the �porn� realm.

As it stands at present, I rate it accordingly.

Visit Beauty Is Divine - View Replies - Add Reply

1 By Day Review

Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:44:29 PDT

1 By Day (22)

09-03-08 07:44am

REVIEW = 96 by ace of aces (108)

Pros:
+ flashing casting
+ no drm
+ no dl lilmit
+ exclusive material
+ nice hp design
+ different video fromats like:flash,wmv, Divx, quicktime, mpeg
+ high � ultra high video quality
+ fast download speed (13.000 kbit/s)
+ dl managers work good
+ all kind of tits (small � big)
+ all kind of pussy hair (shaved-hairy)
+all kind of shoes (high heels, boots only socks e.g.)
+ all kind of clothes (uniforms, satin e.g.)
+ every video has it`s story
+ 2 (!) daily updates

Cons:
-strange navigation (read below)
-high membership price

Bottom Line:
This site is todays top of the sites with this kind of topics.

You got hundreds of good till high quality videos, which are downlaodable very fast.

The videos are arranged as a calendar. Therfore it is easy to see which on eis new and which on is old. The search engine is good. You can search by names, or hair colours e.g..

The duration of a video is arround 10- 20 minutes. They are donwloadable in plenty different types. the good thing to name is, that the downladmanager problems from former times are belonging to the past. dl manager worked fine.

the content of the videos is enormous.
there is mastrubation, dildo play, bathing, showering, undressing, dressing, lesbo play, hardcore one girl two man and two man one girl and last but not least machine sex play.

The girls are very cute and nice to look at.

You got every kind of haircolour, tit sice, pussy hairs and kind of girls. Having also all kind of clothes like nurses and all kind of shoes like high heels combined with all kind of action, this site makes it very easy to love it.

You got also the categorie jokes and mastrubation. Mastrubation is a close up video, even nice to look at. Jokes�o.k. i am honest, that isn`t at general my thing.

The flashing casting is a very nice idea. having that casting like it is shown here, is something totally new for me. great idea folks.
Spinning this idea forward it would be great having an �interactive� video (with commands like using dildo, undressing e.g.).

no few words to the so called "cons"
Sometimes the sets and the faces are repeating, but beeing honest, with that much of content, it`s no wonder.

The navigation isn´t awfull at all. But there are two things they had changed worse.
You can`t see at the calender preview which topic the video is. Former times it was easier. The videos had headlines, therfore it was easy to see what kind of topic is behind the beautifull picture. The second point is, that you aren`t able to see the calender posts of former years like 2006 e.g.

Last but not least the price is much to high. Even if you have so much to enjoy arround 35 $ is to high priced.

But all in all this site is a MUST VISITED.
Lower the price and clear the navigation a lilttle bit then my points go up to 99.

Highly recommended!

Visit 1 By Day - View Replies - Add Reply

FTV Girls Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:13:10 PDT

FTV Girls (27)

08-22-08 08:13pm

REVIEW = 78 by messmer (24)

Pros:
Tons of very attractive models.

The new Super HD videos are crystal clear with
a size of 1440x1080 and a total bitrate of 8000 kbps.

Picture sets are zipped.

Cons:
Older videos (even as recent as 2007 and 2006) are of mediocre quality. Just as an experiment I went to the models' list and downloaded two video segments each from the first two models that were listed with a 2000 bitrate, wmv. I also downloaded the same two segments in divx.

Divx was an unmitigated disaster, the wmv files were better but far from crisp and clear as one would expect from something shot as recently as one - two years ago. One video shot in 2004 and downloaded because I really liked the model hit the recycle bin within seconds it was so awful.

The segments are numbered in a most awkward way. Each you will download will be called 01dx (for DVX), 01w (WMV), 01HD (HD) and you will be forced to rename it. Even if a model has two separate sets, both are named the same.

There is no search engine.

Some pictures can be obtained zipped in super size but the choice of pictures is arbitrary!

The regular pictures themselves are only so-so in size and definition.

Bottom Line:
There should be two scores: One for what FTV are offering NOW (for that I would give them a ninety even if the updates ARE slow) and one for the rest of their material which is really mediocre in my eyes. The girls are great and are doing some daring things in a natural way which I find appealing but what good is that if the picture is small and blurred as is so often the case with the older material.

September 16: I will not lower the original score because the site deserves it but the more I read the site's derogatory comments on some of the models' looks or performance, the angrier I got.

It is demeaning to them and uncalled for. Let us users make up our minds if someone's body needs "tone" (a comment in today's update) or if their actions weren't as enthusiastic as they could have been. This site will NOT be revisited by me.

Visit FTV Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

FTV Girls Review

Fri, 22 Aug 2008 08:20:14 PDT

FTV Girls (27)

08-22-08 08:20am

REVIEW = 89 by clyde (13)

Pros:
- Great Interaction with the Models
- Models are young and very fresh looking
- Public Nudity is very good in this sight. I usually don't care for it much. This feels real and the anticipation/trepidation of getting caught is evident, nervous laughter, etc.
- Ultra HD video is great! Runs well on my machine and looks fantastic.
- Huge Library -

Cons:
- No Search Function
- Should have super sized photos for every set
- No Hardcore Boy/Girl Action

Bottom Line:
This site provides what they promise! That is unusual in this industry. The videos have gotten tons better over the years. I was first a member in 2002 and still have the photosets and vids. It makes me laugh at what I though quality was.

I will be making my way to the older sets, I'm interested in seeing if FTV has updated any of the older content, now that the rendering process is much more advanced. The speed of data transfer alone allows so much more terms of quality.

I would rate this a quality site... off the charts if they added Hardcore.

Visit FTV Girls - View Replies - Add Reply