<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Magazines - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=31</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_26361</guid>
		<title>Swank Mag Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26361</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/swankmag.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Swank Mag&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/swankmag/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Swank Mag&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					10-31-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:28pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5616&quot;&gt;xbigvmanx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5616&quot;&gt;10&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					7 website for the price of one
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Video quality could use improvement&lt;br /&gt;
Interactive interface
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					When I turned 18, I bought my first Swank magazine. What I loved about it are the pictures had some of the best photographers back in the day like Suze Randal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/earlmiller/&quot;&gt;Earl Miller&lt;/a&gt; etc just to name a few. I have over 300 issues all properly bagged in my box. Almost 15 years later I finally decided to try an online perspective of my favorite magazine and I have to say I was a bit disappointed.  So lets start off with the good stuff. The majority of the videos are hardcore. You get a pretty decent package of 7 websites to navigate thru which are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/just18/&quot;&gt;Just 18&lt;/a&gt;, Velvet, Gent and D-cup to name a few all are magazines in their own right and are a part of the Swank infrastructure.  The content is pretty decent of what your paying for which is all there is to say on the good part.  Now the bad part is a disappoinntment especially a long time Swank fan like me. The videos a a little grainy I am surprised they having used the dvd movies they have on the market for this website, finding your favorite model with a different alias can be confusing, so navigation between websites can also be confusing when your trying to find out what is a really worth your time to download.  If I had to recommend swank to anyone I would just recommend you subscribe to the magazine instead of this website. I am actually being nice to give them a 75 just because I was a fan their publication.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6381&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Swank Mag&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=26361&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=26361&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:28:24 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_6815</guid>
		<title>Watch 4 Beauty Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6815</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/watch4beauty.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Watch 4 Beauty&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-07-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:02pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;jd1961&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1648&quot;&gt;82&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Hi-Res Photos&lt;br /&gt;
- Zip Files Available&lt;br /&gt;
- Great Models&lt;br /&gt;
- Good Price
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Not Many Videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation Could Be Better&lt;br /&gt;
- Not A Huge Amount Of Material
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I've been getting into these so-called &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; sites lately, mostly for the photos. This is one of the better examples of these sort of sites. The models here are really hot, let's face it--Europe is blowing away the U.S. as far as erotica is concerned at the moment. The girls are just a lot better looking. The problem at this site is that they don't yet have enough models or sets to justify a multi month membership as of yet. I got everything I wanted in my 1 month membership, but what great stuff it is! The photos are hi-res, and great looking. The photography is a lot more erotic than that of similiar sites. Not a lot of &amp;quot;statue posing&amp;quot; here. You can choose up to 5000 pix(!), but as I said, as of this review there are only 85 models. They have HD video also, not a whole lot yet. Personally, I find the &amp;quot;glamour&amp;quot; vids boring, but that's my prejudice---if that's your cup of tea, you won't be disappointed I guess. You can choose between wmv and quicktime. But back to the photos, I love them! They're in the magazine style, with titles like &amp;quot;Provoking Cock&amp;quot;! The navigation---while the member's area is very attractive, the navigation is a bit irritating. You click the model, go to her page. You click her picture, get the sets. You click a set, and then you have to click the cover, and then you're finally there! And they don't include the cover in the set, you have to save the hi-res cover and place it in yourself. Site is updated frequently. it will be better in a year.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11143&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Watch 4 Beauty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=6815&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=6815&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:02:19 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_4246</guid>
		<title>Pure Beauty Magazine Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4246</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/purebeautymag/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/purebeautymag.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Pure Beauty Magazine&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/purebeautymag/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Pure Beauty Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-28-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:08am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;156&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Large, mostly exclusive collection of some very hot &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eurobabes/&quot;&gt;Eurobabes&lt;/a&gt; going back to April 2004 (daily updates start Feb. 2005)&lt;br /&gt;
+zips in 3-4 sizes depending on gallery, largest ranging from 2560, 3264, 3872, 4992px, etc.  (Up to April 2005 there are some that max only to 1200; some go much larger.)&lt;br /&gt;
+nice autologin (no username or pwd needed!)&lt;br /&gt;
+nice preview section in public area
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-lack of light in too many galleries &lt;br /&gt;
-blurriness in photos (too often!)&lt;br /&gt;
-other ANNOYING “artistic” (mis-)treatments such as excessive redness, blueness, graininess, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
-awkward auto-resizing of the window when you open a gallery; happens every time you return from viewing a single pic!  Why not let it be full screen?  Plus it always takes you back to the top of the page, not to where you were.&lt;br /&gt;
-small number of pics in most galleries recently acquired from former “Max Archives” site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is a purely softcore photography site with no toys.  If you’ve never been, you’re in for a real treat with many established Euro-beauties such as Kyla Cole, Tereza Ilova, Veronica/Lola L, Lenka Horokova, Jennifer Max, Kathy (the Czech blond with hee-uge tata’s), Monica Vesela, etc.  I do recommend it as such for at least one join.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It has only 48 videos, so that’s not a priority for them.  Formats include Windows Media, DivX, and QuickTime in 640x480.  No DRM!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It tries to be a kind of “lifestyle” site, including extras such as exchange rates (“Time to buy Euros?  Damn, look at that ASS!”), an amusing “news” section (e.g., “Boy Kills Monster Pig Larger Than Hogzilla”), world clocks (NYC certainly isn’t accurate), and insights into photography.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And this brings me to my biggest complaint about it:  its artistic pretensions, its greatest and most tragic being that what WE want is to see the models bathed in dark blue light and so forth.  After all, it’s “art.”  Uh-huh.  Well, I’ve been wanting to say this for a long time, and this review is as good as any to say it in:&lt;br /&gt;
Fuck art.  &lt;br /&gt;
I mean, “FUCK!” “ART!”  &lt;br /&gt;
WE WANT PORN!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There.  Enough wasting OUR money so that you can enjoy your lousy “art.”  We’re PORN USERS here, not art lovers!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
‘kay???
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8411&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Pure Beauty Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=4246&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=4246&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 06:08:28 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_3708</guid>
		<title>Domination Online Magazine Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3708</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dominationonline/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/dominationonline.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Domination Online Magazine&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/dominationonline/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Domination Online Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					05-10-07&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:46am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=996&quot;&gt;djwolf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=996&quot;&gt;61&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Fully exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of quality video clips&lt;br /&gt;
- Full length streaming videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Updated 3 times a month&lt;br /&gt;
- Mistress Isabella looks hot&lt;br /&gt;
- Varied content&lt;br /&gt;
- Fairly priced
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Average picture quality&lt;br /&gt;
- Cannot access all streaming movies&lt;br /&gt;
- More mistresses would be good&lt;br /&gt;
- Fairly basic design
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is one of the better femdom sites out there. It is the home of Mistress Isabella Sinclaire who looks very sexy indeed in her various fetish outfits.&lt;br /&gt;
The site features plenty of content and shows a good variety of action including whipping, caning, CBT, foot worship, bondage etc.&lt;br /&gt;
There are close to 500 video clips to download in real media format. The clips are taken from full movies and last from 30 secs up to 5 mins. The more recent clips are in better quality and are generally longer. Another feature is the full length streaming movies which you can view online, although unfortunately there are only a certain amount available at one time. There are also lots of pictures to view but the quality could do with being improved.&lt;br /&gt;
The best thing about this site is the fact that it looks so real, Mistress Isabella really plays the part well and enjoys herself with both male and female slaves.&lt;br /&gt;
For $24.95 you get very good value for money here.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dominationonline.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Domination Online Magazine&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3708&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=3708&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 04:46:53 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>