<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
	<title>PU - Solo Models - New Reviews</title>
	<description>Porn Reviews by the People.</description>
	<link>http://www.pornusers.com/browse_reviews.html?Niche=28</link>
	<copyright>Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_24122</guid>
		<title>Busty Romina Lopez Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24122</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bustyrominalopez/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/bustyrominalopez.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Busty Romina Lopez&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/bustyrominalopez/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Busty Romina Lopez&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					09-03-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:21pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4322&quot;&gt;careylowell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4322&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-G cup Romina has a just arrived from the farm, I've-never-done-this-kinda-thing look refreshing to porn purveyors used to jaded American tramps.&lt;br /&gt;
-First nude web model from Paraguay! (My guess).&lt;br /&gt;
-Her chum Paola, seen in nine or ten sets, is a hottie with an even bigger bow. &lt;br /&gt;
-Low renewal rate.&lt;br /&gt;
-No attempt to hide rolls of flesh.&lt;br /&gt;
-Many sets shot outdoors in glorious South American sunlight
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Roughly two-thirds of the videos have fair to middling sound.&lt;br /&gt;
-When the gals speak, the lanaguage is strictly Spanish with a very few sporting English subtitles.&lt;br /&gt;
-Lopez's looks are a few rungs down the beauty ladder compared to sites I normally pay for.  &lt;br /&gt;
-No hardcore.&lt;br /&gt;
-Romina and Paola attempt some tit kissing &amp; grabbing, but clearly they don't know what they're doing. Very awkward.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Not for those desiring Met-Art grade models or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/scoreland/&quot;&gt;Scoreland&lt;/a&gt; style web design. Photography is from the aw-shucks school with themes like bra fittings, jump rope, strip tease, oh let me rub that lotion on you. No DP here. Best photo sets are those of Lopez sporting lots of make-up. Usually not my thing, but the stuff softens her mannish features.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bustyrominalopez.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Busty Romina Lopez&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=24122&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=24122&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 14:21:03 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23967</guid>
		<title>Sonia Dane Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23967</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/soniadane/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/soniadane.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Sonia Dane&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/soniadane/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sonia Dane&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-29-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:17pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 79&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;58&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very faithful to the lingerie niche.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very classy, adult site.&lt;br /&gt;
- Lots of content with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lingeriepass/&quot;&gt;Lingerie Pass&lt;/a&gt; membership.&lt;br /&gt;
- Sonia is a classy, elegant, attractive, mature lady who obviously enjoys what she does.&lt;br /&gt;
- Many pics will make old-school undy lovers happy.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Video section is a mess in many ways, see bottom line.&lt;br /&gt;
- Pics are small: 480x640 to 1024x737.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloads speeds were consistently slow, averaging 160k per sec.&lt;br /&gt;
- Pic sets are arranged all on one page, and it takes a while to load.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I have mixed feelings about this site. One one hand, it's extremely classy and mature all around, with nothing tacky or sleezy about it, and for an old-school panty/lingerie fan like me, it is sometimes the best in that genre; on the other hand, I can't help wondering why the physical quality of the content is not up to 2008 standards, why, in fact, it is barely up to 2003 standards; and why, after being online so long, are there all of 16 video clips available, and why, oh why, is the quality of these clips so dismal?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sonia has a hair over 200 sets up, and with older sets you are looking at pics as small as 480x640, Newer sets offer bigger pics, but still not great, at 1024x737. These people are obviously not hard-up for money, so why continue to sell low-to-moderate quality content when upgrades are almost certainly possible?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Vids: I counted 16 video clips, ranging from 2 to 8 minutes in length, on Sonia's site proper. The newer clips are stream-only and cannot be downloaded. Older clips can be downloaded, but there is no reason why you should bother. One vid I checked was WMV 320x240, 889k; another was a Quick Time vid which was absolutely unwatchable because the quality was so bad. Additionally, I had many problems waiting for the vid page to load. I have a fast connection and all other sites hum along fine, but Sonia's site is slow in general, and excruciantingly slow in regard to the vid page. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A definite plus here is Sonia's guest model section, which now includes 46 models, each with her own little sub-site. Some of these models have upwards of 70 sets, but a good deal have only a handful. By and large there is some excellent, tasteful stuff on offer, but, as with Sonia's site, the pics are small, small, small. Some of the guest models have vids, but these are relatively few.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This site, meaning Sonia's in particular, has the potential to be one of the very best in the panty/lingerie niche, and in fact it's quite ubiquitous in the lingerie/panty newsgroups and is generally highly regarded; but the site itself doesn't live up to its implicit reputation. To go from merely average to exceptional, all this place needs is some serious improvement in the *physical* quality of its content. The strictly aesthetic quality of the content, mind you, is absolutely tops. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Final thought on the vids: either offer something worthwhile or drop them entirely, please. There's nothing wrong with being a picture site.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.soniadane.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Sonia Dane&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23967&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23967&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:17:44 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23964</guid>
		<title>Abigail 18 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23964</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/abigail18/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/abigail18.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Abigail 18&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/abigail18/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abigail 18&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-29-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:30pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;WeeWillyWinky&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1613&quot;&gt;58&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Abigail is bee-yoootiful.&lt;br /&gt;
- 5 bonus sites, yielding a good amount of content for price over-all.&lt;br /&gt;
- Abigail's tush.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good pic size (1700x1200 in newer sets)&lt;br /&gt;
- Abigail's breasts.&lt;br /&gt;
- Abigail's knee-caps, ankles, and spinal column.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No zips.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are negligible.&lt;br /&gt;
- Sets are dreadfully monotonous.&lt;br /&gt;
- Most of the best pics are available at various TGPs for free.&lt;br /&gt;
- The site is anemic and seems to be strictly a commercial endeavor.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					My falling for this site was the result of developing a hopeless crush on Abigail and hoping - against all reason and totally contrary to experience - that I would be delighted and swept away once I got inside. This did not happen. I was mainly interested in seeing her videos, which, unfortunately, are nearly useless. Note: if you read a review of Abi's site at Porn Inspector you'll see that they claim the vids come in at 2620k and are 720x480! This is totally untrue. I didn't save any vids but I believe they are about 1100k tops and are not as big as PI claims. Not only that, the vids I checked are set to cheesy &amp;quot;music&amp;quot; and if there is any other audio it is drowned out by this semi-organized series of sounds which is sometimes, and purely for the sake of convenience, refered to as &amp;quot;music&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pics, at least in newer sets, are decent (1700x1200 app.) and with 80 or so sets there are plenty of them. Unfortunately, not much effort was put into making the sets varied or interesting beyond the fact that a beautiful girl is in them. Cutesy is the order of the day, and the sets follow a predictable pattern: fully clothed, lift shirt, remove shirt, take off shorts, kneel, tug panties and show crack, show more crack, show full tush, fully naked.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The pics are soft and only rarely do you get a decent glimpse of Abi's precious peach, but that's alright since we all know what it looks like anyway, and besides, soft is what I was expecting.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are five bonus sites on offer, all nearly identical to Abigail's: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lovelyanne/&quot;&gt;Lovely Anne&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lovelyirene/&quot;&gt;Lovely Irene&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ericasfantasies/&quot;&gt;Erica's Fantasies&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennyreid/&quot;&gt;Jenny Reid&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/lovelytera/&quot;&gt;Lovely Tera&lt;/a&gt;. All these girls are knock-outs, particularly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jennyreid/&quot;&gt;Jenny Reid&lt;/a&gt;, but I simply couldn't get too excited over any of the material, for the simple reason that a good portion of it is available for free all over Netville, and the videos are mostly short, mid-quality yawnfests.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This, folks, is pure product with little or no personality. This network of sites is a money-making enterprise and while I have no problem at all with capitalism, I would like a wee bit more originality, more character, for my money, more high-end content, and less cookie-cutter material. Thanks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P.S: Abigail is truly gorgeous. She deserves better.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14292&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Abigail 18&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23964&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23964&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:30:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23956</guid>
		<title>Seska Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23956</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/seska/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/seska.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Seska&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/seska/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Seska&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-29-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:39pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=331&quot;&gt;pinkerton&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=331&quot;&gt;15&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Beautiful girl, petite and very sexy, seems like she's having a great time fucking, sucking and licking with her partner and friends, both male and female. Great attitude.&lt;br /&gt;
Looks great in dark stockings, particularly when getting fucked doggie-style or reverse-cowgirl by guy or girl.&lt;br /&gt;
Amateur sex quite refreshing compared with hardcore sites.&lt;br /&gt;
No download limits or DRM.&lt;br /&gt;
Trial subscription is not limited.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Limited content.&lt;br /&gt;
Videos are 1-2 minute clips of 320x240 mpegs so not great quality but fine for your i-Pod/mobile phone.&lt;br /&gt;
Pics aren't very high res.&lt;br /&gt;
Sex is with the same few guys (her hubby and a friend) and gals.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A fairly good site that you'd visit once or at most twice, some decent content though nothing really hardcore, but hey, she ain't that kinda gal.&lt;br /&gt;
I'd say it's priced about right but I couldn't see myself taking out a month subscription - there's just not enough content or quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Definitely a site worth visiting once in a very long while (I took out a month subscription about 4 years ago).&lt;br /&gt;
Judging from the site's content, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/seska/&quot;&gt;Seska&lt;/a&gt; definitely seems like someone it'd be a pleasure to meet personally and hang out with, and not just because she's really hot ;)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seska.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Seska&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23956&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23956&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:39:43 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23904</guid>
		<title>Nikky Blond Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23904</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nikkyblond/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nikkyblond.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nikky Blond&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nikkyblond/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nikky Blond&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-27-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;08:24am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 67&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;ace of aces&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;92&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ multi site access&lt;br /&gt;
+ hc and sc movies&lt;br /&gt;
+ no dl limit (if you have something to dl :) )&lt;br /&gt;
+ exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ no drm&lt;br /&gt;
+ nice site design&lt;br /&gt;
+ 135 videos (exclusive nicky)&lt;br /&gt;
+ dl in high and low quality&lt;br /&gt;
+ mpeg &amp;amp; wmv files
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- dl manager not really supported&lt;br /&gt;
- broken connection (often discos)&lt;br /&gt;
- very expansive&lt;br /&gt;
- splitted video parts have no preview&lt;br /&gt;
- slow downloadspeed 5.000 kbit/s&lt;br /&gt;
- multiple downloads are broken&lt;br /&gt;
- site speed sometimes extrem slow (ca. 7 of 10 times)&lt;br /&gt;
- site sometimes out of order&lt;br /&gt;
- regular updates?? never trust what is written at a site !&lt;br /&gt;
- near 624 videos (bonus movies exclusive? and also not working mostly !))&lt;br /&gt;
- network isn`t reachable over the main site. have to login separate
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					that was a little bit disappointing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Joining this site very short time after &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/a&gt; site, i have to recognize that not everything that looks gold (blond :) ) is gold…&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Starting with positive first:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are plenty videos in high till medium quality. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content goes from softcore, mastrubation, penetration, dildoing, lesbian, hardcore up to 2 girls one boy. All in all very lookable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nikky is an attractive blonde girl witth nice huge boobs. &lt;br /&gt;
Here boobs were growing bigger with the time (thanks for the silicon :) ).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the pussy hair is trimmed, sometimes shaved.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If the videos at this site are not enough for you, you have also an multiple site acess to good till weak sites.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That`s all with the positive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The trial is not available as a full trial. You are only able to download fiew parts of the videos and not the whole video. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
after changing my membership into a full one (get a special offer about 9,95$ ) the problem was solved. &lt;br /&gt;
sadly the videos from the other network sites weren`t downloadmanager supported, so you have to download every single video on it`s own.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The regulat price with 24,95 is much to expansive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
updates at this site? &lt;br /&gt;
beliving the site owner there are 2 updates per week since 1994. &lt;br /&gt;
hmmmm...calculating ... &lt;br /&gt;
2 x 52 weeks x 12 years= omg !! where is the rest of the movies :) &lt;br /&gt;
in my calculation there had to be 1.248 movies. all in all, there are only 135 videos, even if i also add the bonus movies (bonus means by it words, not in the regular update inclusive) i have all in all arround 759 movies.... ts ts ts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh man, i was so in trouble while downloading the files. Some of the files were broken, i wasn`t able to download more then one video simultan and the download speed is for such a nice designed site horrible slow (like some of the russian sites). &lt;br /&gt;
if you try to download the bonus movies you get horrified. &amp;quot;downloadfile.php&amp;quot; is all you can download. what a mess!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And unlikely the splitted videos have no preview picture 0o.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Fix the massive download problems and my rating will jump up into the 80s..until then:&lt;br /&gt;
     LESS RECOMMENDED
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2437&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nikky Blond&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23904&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23904&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:24:21 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23878</guid>
		<title>Tera Patrick Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23878</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/terapatrick/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/terapatrick.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Tera Patrick&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/terapatrick/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Tera Patrick&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:51am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Great price through TBP.&lt;br /&gt;
-She is truly gorgeous. Definitely my personal favorite as far as looks.&lt;br /&gt;
-The site claims 68 DVD's, 338 hours, and 307GB on this site alone, not counting the network.&lt;br /&gt;
-Part of a network of 1336 DVDS, 838 hours, and 17134 GB.&lt;br /&gt;
-NO DRM or download limits.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Ridiculous navigation. Each video has its own page and then pictures and downloads are on that page. No visible download option, so you have to hit &amp;quot;see video&amp;quot; and then the video and picture options come up. No easy way to search either.&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of the videos are either not including her, or are non or only partial nudity. I hate behind the scenes, interviews, lame photo shoots, etc.&lt;br /&gt;
-Most of the sex scenes are with her husband Spyder Jonez. Hate his tattoos that cover nearly every inch of his body. Big turnoff.&lt;br /&gt;
-Two options for downloading videos: best quality and just ok. &lt;br /&gt;
-No option for downloading just clips. I love to save the last part of very long sex scenes.&lt;br /&gt;
-Not supported for download managers. I have three and none of them work. Very time consuming tedious manual downloads.&lt;br /&gt;
-Pictures are all less than the best quality screenshots, with no option for zip downloading.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					A very big disappointment. Considering how much I like her, it takes a lot to make me feel that this site is not worth joining. She has so many videos, but very few on this site that are worth space on my hard drive.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=247&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Tera Patrick&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23878&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23878&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:51:28 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23867</guid>
		<title>Kelly E Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23867</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellye/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/kellye.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Kelly E&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellye/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kelly E&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-26-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:53am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- Cool website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus models.&lt;br /&gt;
- Access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aziani/&quot;&gt;Aziani&lt;/a&gt; network (7 bonus websites).&lt;br /&gt;
- Streaming option for videos offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets quality is very good.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit noticed.&lt;br /&gt;
- Trial option offered.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Not sure when kelly ericson's updates come. (Network updates daily)&lt;br /&gt;
- No multiple download formats for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos quality could be better.&lt;br /&gt;
- Tiny collection of Kelly.&lt;br /&gt;
- No interaction with Kelly.&lt;br /&gt;
- Monthly subscription price could be lower (network access).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Kelly-e is a clone site of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aziani/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aziani/&quot;&gt;Aziani&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to 23 Kelly's photosets and 12 videos. Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format, making it easy and simple. Quality is very good. Videos can be downloaded only in one format (.wmv) as full length movies or you can stream them online. Quality is average and surely some more download formats and quality impromevent would be great. &lt;br /&gt;
Website design is very good and you will not have a problem with navigation. There is no DRM videos protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
Members have access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aziani/&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/aziani/&quot;&gt;Aziani&lt;/a&gt;.com&lt;/a&gt; network which mean that you will have access to 7 bonus websites. Content is exclusive and updates come daily (network). I am not sure when Kelly's updates come or even if there are any of them.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price could be a bit lower, at my opinion but there is a trial option offered. There is no interaction with Kelly or other network models.&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, Kelly is hot and her site's collection is tiny but surely deserves a look with the network access offered.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=2059&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Kelly E&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23867&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23867&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:53:04 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23830</guid>
		<title>Brandi Belle Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23830</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brandibelle/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/brandibelle.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Brandi Belle&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/brandibelle/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Brandi Belle&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:01pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5071&quot;&gt;elonlybuster&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5071&quot;&gt;6&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Random videos&lt;br /&gt;
-Unpredictable acts&lt;br /&gt;
-Very unique compared to other sites&lt;br /&gt;
-Video quality is pretty good&lt;br /&gt;
-Not alot of talking in every video&lt;br /&gt;
-She's exclusive&lt;br /&gt;
-You'll see stars from her affiliate sites&lt;br /&gt;
-unlimited daily download (or at least I have yet to see a limit)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-There really isn't a whole lot of material&lt;br /&gt;
-Some video descriptions lack information&lt;br /&gt;
-No actual update schedule&lt;br /&gt;
-2 simultaneous downloads (you sometimes cannot browse if you're downloading 2)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It's hard to judge this site because there's quite a few different things here.  You'll see various acts and ideas, but you never really know what to expect from video to video.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In terms of video amount there's a lot more than expected, about 100+.  She's in about 98% of them, and about 70% of them a feature some sort of girl on girl (some with a guy), and others may feature complete randomness such ass her giving a guy a handjob, measuring guys, and just a blowjob here or there. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is no update schedule which is unlike an affiliate of Bangbros, BUT if this is your first time subscribing there's more than enough to keep you entertained for a while. I wouldn't get a month to month membership, because if you skip a couple months you can count on it being there when you return. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would without a doubt recommend this site for someone who's not entire sure what they're really into because it explores quite a few things.  You'll see voyeur material such as her giving a blowjob on a public bus (was not staged), experimentation with various positions, the pizza boy with an extra large &quot;sausage&quot; pizza cliche, and other surprises.  Brandi isn't your normal girl and deserves more than just a quick glimpse. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My only big downfall to the site is that there is no list of friends so you can see who's in which video, but it's not really a big deal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
**I recommend you sign up under the Bangbros network to get access to affiliates.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11450&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Brandi Belle&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23830&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23830&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 18:01:56 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23810</guid>
		<title>Enter Belladonna Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23810</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/enterbelladonna/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/enterbelladonna.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Enter Belladonna&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/enterbelladonna/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Enter Belladonna&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:39am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;295&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Belladonna has to be the only female pornstar that I actually enjoy seeing her eye shadow run, and this is her site. &lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality is pretty good, 500 range high end with solid 1600 bitrates. &lt;br /&gt;
- A lot of picture sets, around 300, but most are vidcaps and none have zip files, but you can use a DL manager to download the pictures in bulk to make your own zips. &lt;br /&gt;
- The 100 or so DVDs not only feature Belladonna, but plenty of either great pornstars like Rebecca Linares. Plenty of booty on this site!&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloads are faster than average.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Price it too high, even the trial price is too high at $20 for 7 days! I just did the monthly option for $35. &lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is frustrating to say the least. See next con for further explanation. &lt;br /&gt;
- Upsells to buy DVDs that aren't on the site and some that are on other sites, the navigation is poor enough that you WILL click, &amp;quot;Buy DVD&amp;quot; on accident at least once and end up on some other site. One page the download option will be first, next page, buy DVD is first, no wonder I have OCDC issues!&lt;br /&gt;
- I can't say this for sure, but I think you can get some of these DVDs on VB, and the other DVD sites, though there are some I've never seen. &lt;br /&gt;
- Everything could be improved, better video quality, picture quality and zip files.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Let me start with my own description of Belladonna. I believe she is a Latina, really nice big butt, has all kinds of tattoos, kind of a gothic look going there with the black hair and she isn't going to win any &amp;quot;prettiest&amp;quot; of most feminine contests, even against other hardcore porn models. This woman is pretty dirty and wild. Which is why I like her. I usually like my dainty Euro models that look like they could fit on the stage of a fashion show, but Belladonna is my other choice in porn models.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For once, a woman that actually spits on the guy that smacks her, then tells him that she is going to ride the &amp;quot;hide off your balls&amp;quot;. Think twice about smacking her, huh? She is sloppy in her sex, slobbering, drooling, sorry Drooler, and she gags herself while giving blowjobs. No need to force her head down on it, she is already doing it! She likes anal, vaginal, oral, girls, guys, groups, and you know what? She is damn believable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I would call her a kinky version of Eva Angelina. One of my favorite clips, she says, &amp;quot;Pay? I'm not here to be paid, I'm here to wear your ass out&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I personally find her attractive, tattoos and all, it fits her image. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If this sounds like your kind of pornstar, then you should at least look up her DVDs on DVD sites. This site makes it easier for you with over 100 DVDs that feature her. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh and the funny quotes, she tells one woman in a girl/girl scene, &amp;quot;I thought you were a REAL lesbian?&amp;quot; when the girl is screaming and pulling her hair. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, she is the selling point, 100%. The quality here is below average with barely 500 high end videos, with a good 1600 bitrate. The pictures at best are 1200 high end, no zips, so it means you are going to have to at least use a download manager if you want those. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The navigation is pretty bad, if you hate upsells, this site might just push you over the edge. It is filled with them. There is little by the way of a search engine. It is a lot of scroll, click, find scenes, click download, not buy or watch, then start over to find another scene. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But, I don't think these negative kill the site simply because I think Belladonna would enjoy watching us face this frustration! She is a great performer, though she has aged some lately and is gaining some weight, she still fits that prototype of a nice thick Latina that you always wanted to try out. Her site gets a recommendation from me simply because of her and her high enthusiasm in her scenes. Like I said, very believable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11332&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Enter Belladonna&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23810&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23810&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:39:18 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23808</guid>
		<title>Sandy&#39;s Fantasies Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23808</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sandysfantasies/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/sandysfantasies.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Sandy's Fantasies&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sandysfantasies/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Sandy's Fantasies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:04am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 84&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=296&quot;&gt;exotics4me&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=296&quot;&gt;295&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- My monthly &amp;quot;should have known better and listened&amp;quot; guilty pleasure site join!&lt;br /&gt;
- More DDF goodness with some of my favorite Euro models, and I didn't have most of the content. &lt;br /&gt;
- Though this will be a con, the site is dead, no updates, giving a pro though because DDF has the decency to post on the site before joining that it no longer updates, showing that rare honesty. &lt;br /&gt;
- Though a small collection, the 160+ picture sets and 160+ videos are all very good. &lt;br /&gt;
- Though it hasn't been updated in a year, it still has zips for the photo sets, the videos though not as good as most new videos are better than about half of the porn site's NEW ones at 640 high end with a 2000 bitrate&lt;br /&gt;
- Very fast downloads, probably not a lot of members downloading. Downloaded whole site in 5 days of limited downloaded time per day.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Not updating, should be clear as the TBP review tells it as does the actual site before you join. So, I am knocking it only because I really like the content that I have downloaded and am saying that I wish it was still updating. &lt;br /&gt;
- Maybe lower the price since it isn't updating or include it with one of the other &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/1byday/&quot;&gt;1byday&lt;/a&gt; sites or for an even more attractive option, how about if a person lets a DDF site recur for a second month, they get access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sandysfantasies/&quot;&gt;Sandy's Fantasies&lt;/a&gt;? Just a thought.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Cons were hard to come by, the quality was plenty good enough, zips, great model selection, but the one big con is a huge one. I really wished this site was still going. I've always liked Sandy as a model, her and Mia Stone are my favorite blonde models. Every other model on here is also a star these days, and I would guess real life friends of Sandy since they are very common on her site. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Think about this, though not updating for well over a year they have full photo set zips, which I would say 50% of active sites don't have and their top video quality is 640 high end with 2,000 bitrate, which is higher than many still active sites. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not for sure why Spencer scored it so low, the score almost turned me away from joining it. I can find very little wrong with the site except that it is dead. I don't know if the content is exclusive, but it was new to me and I have a pretty large collection of content from the featured models. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While I do believe the price is too high considering that you will never join it again though, it isn't too bad and makes the site another of those good ones for collectors. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My biggest reason for joining it is that I am sucker for these Euro models, and I collect several of the models' content. Plus, the quality was plenty good enough for me. If you like Euro models like Sophie Moone, Sandra Shine, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eveangel/&quot;&gt;Eve Angel&lt;/a&gt;, and want some what looks to be younger content of Sandy, this is an above average site in all aspects. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For those that are like me, I recommend trying it since you can clean the whole site out easily on a one month membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=538&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Sandy's Fantasies&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23808&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23808&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 10:04:03 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23801</guid>
		<title>Kelly Madison Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23801</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellymadison/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/kellymadison.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Kelly Madison&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellymadison/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kelly Madison&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-24-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:33am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 50&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5064&quot;&gt;london13&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5064&quot;&gt;0&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Just kelly Madison
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Bad layout&lt;br /&gt;
Image quality poor&lt;br /&gt;
Over Expensive for what you get&lt;br /&gt;
Bad camera angles&lt;br /&gt;
Not enough content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/kellymadison/&quot;&gt;Kelly Madison&lt;/a&gt; is one of my favorite pornstars but this site is sadly lacking in everything. The site has a short shelf life to a user as it has doesnt have much content. The navigation is terrible and the search options limited.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
All of the sex scenes are with her husband which, to me, limits the variety. I feel i wasted my money as there are far better sites out there.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Dont make the same mistake as me. Look elsewhere as whatever you a looking for - it's not here.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=80&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Kelly Madison&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23801&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23801&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 04:33:59 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23771</guid>
		<title>Anette Dawn Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23771</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/anettedawn.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Anette Dawn&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-23-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:20am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 78&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Cool website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Trial option offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus websites access (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/twistys/&quot;&gt;Twistys&lt;/a&gt; Network).&lt;br /&gt;
- Ms &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/a&gt; is dangerously hot.&lt;br /&gt;
- Frequent updates (weekly).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Small collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- More download options for videos would help.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets quality and size could be better.&lt;br /&gt;
- No HD quality offered for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Diary and Wishlist unfinished.&lt;br /&gt;
- No webcam shows.&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Monthly subscription price could be a bit lower.&lt;br /&gt;
- No actual interaction with Anette.&lt;br /&gt;
- Site could update faster (to help it grow faster).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/a&gt; is a hungarian baby that is extremely hot but her site needs improvements at the moment.&lt;br /&gt;
Members have access to 56 photosets and 41 videos. Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format making it simple and easy. Quality is good in here but I think that could be better. Videos can be downloaded in two formats (.mov and .wmv) in parts or as full length movies. More download options in here would be cool as also some quality improvement (personally I think that HD .wmv quality would be the best). There is no DRM protection or download limit plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is very good and you will not have a problem with navigation. Content is exclusive and updates come every week. So every month site updates with 2 photosets and 2 videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Members have access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/twistys/&quot;&gt;Twistys&lt;/a&gt; Network adult websites, which means another 6 in total, with lots of content to download.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is not high but could be a bit lower, at my opinion. Also, there is a trial option offered. Anette's Diary and Wishlist is not set up yet making site look unfinished somehow. Also, I do not think that there is an actual interaction with Anette as I personally sent her 3 e-mails suggesting a few things and I never got an answer.&lt;br /&gt;
Content is only solo so there is no hardcore, which would be great. Also, there is no live webcam shows and I think that if site could update faster, for example twice per week, would help it's collection grow much faster.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, Anette is surely very hot but her site needs growth, personal care and improvements. Recommended for beautiness funs.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14494&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Anette Dawn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23771&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23771&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 07:20:03 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23770</guid>
		<title>Chloe Vevrier Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23770</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chloevevrier/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/chloevevrier.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Chloe Vevrier&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chloevevrier/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Chloe Vevrier&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-23-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:41am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- Great photosets quality.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Consistent updates (photosets).&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Diary is updated.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Navigation is a bit confusing.&lt;br /&gt;
- Video quality needs improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
- More video download options would be cool.&lt;br /&gt;
- No ZIP download option for photosets offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- No trial option.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos aren't updated as often.&lt;br /&gt;
- Unknown cam show schedule.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos length is small.&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/chloevevrier/&quot;&gt;Chloe Vevrier&lt;/a&gt; is definitely very hot but her site has surely room for improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to about 130+ photosets and about 100+ videos. ZIP download option for photosets is not offered so you will have to download them one by one. Quality is very good in here. Videos can only be downloaded in one format (.mov) and there quality needs improvement. Also their length is small. There is no drm protection and I didn't notice a download limit. At this point I have to say that some more download options for videos and quality improvement would make site look much better.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is very good but navigation is a bit confusing. Content is exclusive but there is no hardcore offered only solo and girl / girl scenes. Updates come frequently (photosets) but not so for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is good for a solo model's website (20 USD) but there is no trial option offered for the ones who want to have an idea of what they are buying before getting a full month membership. Chloe's diary updates frequently but I can not say the same about cam show schedule. &lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I believe that this site has many good things but the lack of ZIP download option for photosets, average video quality, confusing navigation and few other things that I mentioned above turns it down. Recommended for Chloe's funs.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6374&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Chloe Vevrier&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23770&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23770&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 06:41:46 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23670</guid>
		<title>Victoria Pink Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23670</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/victoriapink/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/victoriapink.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Victoria Pink&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/victoriapink/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Victoria Pink&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-21-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:45am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 60&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Billing through CCBill.&lt;br /&gt;
-Great price through TBP.&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM or download restrictions.&lt;br /&gt;
-Gorgeous blonde busty model. She seems to be all natural and deserves a website of her own.&lt;br /&gt;
-Easy navigation. Everything clearly labelled.&lt;br /&gt;
-Has 3468 pictures split into 16 galleries of nonnude, 52 nude and 57 fetish. &lt;br /&gt;
-Has 9 bonus games involving pictures of Victoria.&lt;br /&gt;
-Part of a network of 14 websites.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Tiny amount of videos. There are 5 videos split into 37 clips. The total of all the videos is only 77 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
-Apparently not updating.&lt;br /&gt;
-Extremely low quality videos. Most are mpg 1, 320x240. &lt;br /&gt;
-Much of each video is nonnude, nonexplicit. &lt;br /&gt;
-The pictures were all portrait and she appears stiff and wooden. Never smiles, never seems to enjoy what she is doing.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Great model, but you get none of her personality at all. There isn't even a biography. This could have been a terrific website if it had been done right. Poor quality, nowhere near enough quantity. Not at all interesting even as a throw in extra in a network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=967&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Victoria Pink&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23670&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23670&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:45:48 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23624</guid>
		<title>Anette Dawn Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23624</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/anettedawn.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Anette Dawn&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/anettedawn/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Anette Dawn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (5)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-20-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:05am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 89&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;ace of aces&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1962&quot;&gt;92&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+ ultra high dl speed (13.000 kbit/s)&lt;br /&gt;
+ no dl limit&lt;br /&gt;
+ no drm&lt;br /&gt;
+ easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
+ wmv and quicktime videos offered&lt;br /&gt;
+ download in one part and up to 8 parts&lt;br /&gt;
+ very cheap trial (2,44$)&lt;br /&gt;
+ regular price is ok (24,95$)&lt;br /&gt;
+ regular update&lt;br /&gt;
+ network access to over 17.000 videos&lt;br /&gt;
+ video clips have usefull names&lt;br /&gt;
+ clear and nice videos (high quality)&lt;br /&gt;
+ exclusive content&lt;br /&gt;
+ wishlist (great idea, but sadly not launched already!)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- the split download has now preview of scenes&lt;br /&gt;
- only 41 videos&lt;br /&gt;
- updated only every 14 days&lt;br /&gt;
- login system isn`t that good&lt;br /&gt;
- site dl is suprisingly slow&lt;br /&gt;
- mostly mastrubation (less dildo, no hardcore)&lt;br /&gt;
- diary isn`t set up until now&lt;br /&gt;
- wishlist isn`t set up until now
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					surpise, surprise...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
there are still sites that can make me think that my money was well spended.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
this one is such a site.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the girl looks lovely, with hughe (natural?) tits, a nice face and blonde(fake!) hairs. the pussyhair is mostly trimmed, but that`S ok if you don`t like to see totally shaved girls. a little bit more hair would be even nicer in my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the content deals with solo play, softcore, dildoing. sadly missing is hardcore, but that`S the problem mostly with solo sites (maybe the husband is envious? :)) she got different dresses, shoes and in my opinion to less lingerie.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
also positive to mention is, that the &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; twisty music isn`t played often in that videos. (sometimes at the beginning) therfore you can clearly hear the moning and growning :)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the download speed is impressive. my connection has a 13.000 limit, therfore i can`t really say if the download is even faster then my written dl speed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the files have usefull names. the are enumbered and combined with her name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
with that site you got site access to the twistys network. if you like to knew more about that, you should read the reviews below mine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
regarding that the site has launched at 28.01.2008 the number of total videos is quite ok. all in all it`s about 5 videos per month, not bad at all for a solo site, therfore not a big minus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the regular price for only that site would be to high. as a matter of fact that, you have the acces to the twistys network, the price is ok.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
the updaterate is low, but it`s regular updated therfore not a big con. the missing preview of the split videos is a bigger con, that makes the site going below 90.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
rise the number of updates, make previews of scenes lower the price to 15$ and that site will get a 95+.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
absolutly highly recommended!
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14494&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Anette Dawn&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23624&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23624&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:05:39 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23590</guid>
		<title>Cathy&#39;s Craving Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23590</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cathyscraving/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/cathyscraving.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Cathy's Craving&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/cathyscraving/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Cathy's Craving&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (6)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-19-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:31pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 92&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5023&quot;&gt;landers4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5023&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					exclusive content throughout&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
hardcore content - very little softcore at all&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
good quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
frequent updates
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					some video sizes could be larger&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
since Cathy is in most of the scenes, it helps a lot if she turns you on.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
at times there is backgroud laughing or noise that may bother some viewers
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This is one of the best sites I have been priviledged to belong to! I like the fact that they keep this site updated often and also have a running diary each week of Cathy's activities.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The additional videos available are a plus. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is a special niche for those into cremepies, threesomes or watching the wife
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=8311&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Cathy's Craving&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23590&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23590&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:31:10 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23562</guid>
		<title>Femdomme World Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23562</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femdommeworld/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/femdommeworld.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Femdomme World&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femdommeworld/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Femdomme World&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-19-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:33am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 88&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=996&quot;&gt;djwolf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=996&quot;&gt;57&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Lots of high quality videos&lt;br /&gt;
- Pictures for each video shoot&lt;br /&gt;
- Reasonably priced&lt;br /&gt;
- Multiple camera views&lt;br /&gt;
- Varied content
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Basic site design&lt;br /&gt;
- Picture quality could be better&lt;br /&gt;
- Only updated about twice a month
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/femdommeworld/&quot;&gt;Femdommeworld&lt;/a&gt; is a very good femdom site for those who enjoy downloading videos. The content is nice and varied with a number of hot looking women dominating male slaves. It includes whipping, caning, cbt, foot worship and humiliation. The action looks realistic and the women seem to enjoy themselves. Most of them speak softly but then dish out their discipline.&lt;br /&gt;
The video section is the best part and contains around 70 good length video shoots, most of them last for about 20-30 minutes and the quality is very high with a choice of format and also camera angle for certain shoots. Each video shoot also has a picture section with about 30 pictures for each one. The quality is reasonable but could be made better. It seems that the site's main focus is on video content.&lt;br /&gt;
The site has a fairly basic layout with a picture, video and profile section so you can't possibly get lost. The site is updated about twice a month, it would be nice to see weekly updates.&lt;br /&gt;
Overall this is a nice femdom site for a fairly cheap price. Certainly worth joining for the videos alone.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.femdommeworld.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Femdomme World&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23562&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23562&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:33:40 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23561</guid>
		<title>Jada Fire Xposed Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23561</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jadafirexposed/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/jadafirexposed.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Jada Fire Xposed&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/jadafirexposed/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Jada Fire Xposed&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-19-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:32am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 80&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;mbaya&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4708&quot;&gt;40&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Absolutely no problem joining. Epoch is one of the best.&lt;br /&gt;
-Inexpensive full access trial.&lt;br /&gt;
-No DRM or download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
-High quality videos. Either 600x452 1027kbps or 640x480 1531 kbps.&lt;br /&gt;
-71 picture sets of Jada plus 172 others under the Friends icon..&lt;br /&gt;
-Bonus of 17HD sites that are streaming only. &lt;br /&gt;
-VOD of 394 Jada movies available at $5.95 for 30 minutes.&lt;br /&gt;
-30 Friends with galleries but 10 very low quality movies of them.&lt;br /&gt;
-Very simple navigation. Everything is clearly labelled and easy to find.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Only 30 movies about a half hour long of Jada and those only from DVD's. I feel her best movies are on websites, especially &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/sexandsubmission/&quot;&gt;sexandsubmission.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;
-Not download manager supported.&lt;br /&gt;
-No zip file downloading.&lt;br /&gt;
-All of the high resolution video files have the same name-high. You have to change each one as you download.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Nice site if you are a fan of hers. I feel it needs more growth in the videos section as she has done hundreds. The bonus material is a plus, but I would not join only for them. Worth joining for the full access trial, but the monthly price is still too high for the quantity available on it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16691&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Jada Fire Xposed&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23561&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23561&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:32:18 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23511</guid>
		<title>Kate&#39;s Playground Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23511</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/katesplayground/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/katesplayground.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Kate's Playground&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/katesplayground/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kate's Playground&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-17-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:32pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 69&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4764&quot;&gt;squirrel&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4764&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Kate is fine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is lots of content.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Picture quality is good, and the &amp;quot;free sample&amp;quot; images you might have seen don't really do the rest of the content justice -- you've seen all of the &amp;quot;hands hiding the assets&amp;quot; shots, but the other shots are really quite good.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not really &amp;quot;into video&amp;quot; that much, so bear in mind I'm primarily talking about still pictures in this review.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Gosh, if only you could GET that content downloaded to your computer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm sorry, but while the content is fine, the web site really needs to be docked significant points for making it more than extremely tedious and difficult to download that content.  The lack of zip files is just totally unexcusable in this market -- I think this will be the last site I'll join that doesn't offer them.  I wound up having to make extensive use of an automated downloader in order to download the content with any efficiency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The automated downloader did, though, help me find the site's undocumented download limit -- please add this to the site information please -- 4 gigabytes in 24 hours.  Quite a lot, actually, but TELL your customers about it!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Another problem is the lack of unique file names -- I spent quite a lot of time renaming files so that I could make use of them after downloading them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are &amp;quot;customer unfriendly&amp;quot; issues that we shouldn't have to hassle with.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Bottom line?  Kate is good, but the site is extremely customer-unfriendly.  I'm not happy paying a bunch of money when I've got to work my butt off just trying to download the content and make it useful for my needs.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It's simply time to add issues like these to site rankings.  It's time to ding these sites when they have unpublished download limits.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I would recommend to others would mainly be &amp;quot;give your money to the sites that make it easy for you to download their content.&amp;quot;  And you can sure find far better ones than this one.  Let's reward the webmasters who make it easy for us, until sites like this one do something to improve these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This may be &amp;quot;one-sided,&amp;quot; and weighted heavily towards one issue, but I see this as something that's not showing up in &lt;a href=&quot;http://thebestporn.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;thebestporn.com&lt;/a&gt;'s ratings at all, and it goes far, far beyond &amp;quot;site navigation.&amp;quot;  I hope the good folks here will consider paying a lot more attention to these issues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finally, I didn't find the &amp;quot;additional Spunky sites&amp;quot; as having enough content, nor high enough quality, to make them worth enough &amp;quot;added value&amp;quot; to pay for this site.  I certainly will be cancelling my membership long before my first month ends.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=6715&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Kate's Playground&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23511&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23511&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 18:32:38 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23473</guid>
		<title>XOXO Leah Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23473</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/xoxoleah/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/xoxoleah.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter XOXO Leah&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/xoxoleah/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;XOXO Leah&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;01:32pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=4073&quot;&gt;atrapat&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=4073&quot;&gt;34&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Good-looking web-only US softcore model.&lt;br /&gt;
-All-natural, zero tattoos, zero piercings.&lt;br /&gt;
-Exclusive content. Model cannot be found anywhere else.&lt;br /&gt;
-Some good photos, as long as you are OK with lots of airbrushing.&lt;br /&gt;
-I liked the choice of outfits.&lt;br /&gt;
-Good interaction with the model.&lt;br /&gt;
-Model ends up usually fully nude. Softcore posing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Current Weekly Update Rate:&lt;br /&gt;
-1 photo gallery.&lt;br /&gt;
-2 videos from the gallery: 1 BTS, 1 camera tease (10 min each).&lt;br /&gt;
-1 short diary entry. Diary entries are dated.&lt;br /&gt;
-1 hour webcam chat. Full recorded chat is also released.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-The site has lots of little navigation annoyances.&lt;br /&gt;
-Flashy tour but extremely plain design inside.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photography style is always the same.&lt;br /&gt;
-Photos are very repetitive: few different poses.&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos are too slow paced; this makes them quite boring.&lt;br /&gt;
-Model speaks very rarely.&lt;br /&gt;
-Model isn't very skilled at posing (she's barely 19, though).&lt;br /&gt;
-Bad lighting. Content can be too dark or have strange shadows.&lt;br /&gt;
-Weird rebilling options: 1-month is the least expensive per month.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site has a great looking all-natural model, a good update schedule and some decent content but also a plethora of little drawbacks that eventually left me with a sense of missed opportunity. Maybe the creators should subscribe to other sites and see how things are done.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used to think Mac and Bumble (known for airbushing their photos a lot) was the pinnacle of glamour photography so this site's extensive airbrushing isn't a great issue for me. Some of the photos are very worth watching but they are so repetitive that I often came back to photo 4 or 5 before I realised I'd already seen the whole gallery and I'd returned to the start. There's also too much cropping: some limb is often left out of the photo and there are way too much photos of the torso only (boobs and panties, no face). The photos are somewhat small. Ironically, the webmaster started a poll four months ago asking if people would like 1800x1200 photos; everyone answered yes but you still get 1000x670.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Having a 10 minutes behind-the-scenes video and 10 minutes more of camera teasing for each set is a great idea. The trouble is that both videos are extremely slow paced and pretty much indistinguishable except for where the model is looking at: photo camera or video camera. Poses can be sustained for a whole minute except for slight head movements or hair rearrangements, you get long sustained zooms to a body part while the model doesn't move at all, the same music clips over and over in every video even when the model can be seen speaking directly to the camera (no voice can be heard). With a few exceptions, the videos are very unsexy.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Regarding the chats, I haven't attended any (Thursdays, 8PM CST) but I've browsed several of the recorded ones. It's nice to have 1 hour long weekly chats and also have the full recording released a couple of weeks later. Looks like she often wears some costume (nurse, maid, etc) which she gradually takes off. The trouble is that she doesn't speak at all despite the feed has audio. Watching an hour long of video of a hot girl typing and, occasionally standing up to do some striptease isn't worth it. It's probably different if you catch it live but the no-talk is a clear minus anyway. Is her voice so unsexy? Some editing and some more talking would be welcome for the recorded ones.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
She's very active in the forum (2-3 posts per day) and is also reachable by email or PM in the forum. Together with the chats and the (somewhat short and generic) weekly diary entries makes for very good interaction. The webmaster is also reachable in the forum and complaints are listened to.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=17065&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit XOXO Leah&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23473&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23473&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:32:32 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23466</guid>
		<title>I DeepThroat Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23466</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ideepthroat/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ideepthroat.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter I DeepThroat&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ideepthroat/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;I DeepThroat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (3)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-16-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;07:23am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 75&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Lots of movies (300+)&lt;br /&gt;
Tons of pic sets that are not just vidcaps.&lt;br /&gt;
Decent download speeds (averaged around 300-400 kbps)&lt;br /&gt;
All movies fully downloadable.&lt;br /&gt;
Heather is pretty good looking.&lt;br /&gt;
Amazing deepthroat action.&lt;br /&gt;
Only girl I've ever seen keep a man deepthroated while he cums.  Unbelievable.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					No longer updating since '06&lt;br /&gt;
Content gets repetitive.&lt;br /&gt;
Video size and quality isn't great (320x240 mpg).&lt;br /&gt;
No video options or vidcaps.&lt;br /&gt;
Site design is pretty bland.&lt;br /&gt;
Only 1 guy involved, her husband (need some variety).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I kind of found this site by accident by downloading a random file from elsewhere that had the logo for this site on it.  I figured it was just a generic site with deepthroating but when I got to the page I saw that it was all this Heather girl, which is pretty cool actually.  She is easily the best deepthroater I have seen, and her &amp;quot;extra skill&amp;quot; is beyond belief.  Some points:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  So a lot of girls can deepthroat, but this girl is crazy with it.  She takes her husband's 9 inch cock down like it's 1 inch, and can basically just sit with it in there no problem indefinitely.  Well that's good and all, but the real kicker is her &amp;quot;extra skill&amp;quot; that I mentioned.  This is when she has her husband LITERALLY cum down her throat.  There are some vids where she is blowing him and let's the viewer see that he is just starting to cum, at which point she instantly takes his entire cock down and just leaves it there until he is done, and there are other times where you don't even see that he's started, she just never let's him go till he's done shooting his load.  NEVER have I seen something like that.  Hot doesn't even begin to describe it, especially when it doesn't even faze her at all.  No choking, gagging, nothing.  She just has a guy literally cum down her throat like it's an everyday activity.  My god, I didn't even know anyone had ever done such a thing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  There is a lot of content on this site, but it's dated and it shows with the quality and video size.  Very small videos, I'm not even sure if one surpasses 15 or 20 mb on my hard drive so that should say something about what I refer to.  It's enough to get by, but it's not enough to impress.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.  Another point on Heather.  She is very attractive and has a great body EXCEPT for these massive fake boobs.  If you like fake boobs then you'll really be in love but if not watch out, they are some of the fakest boobs I've seen.  So sad when girls do this because they would look so much hotter without them.  Well, that's an opinion I suppose.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.  No more updates here, the site seems to be dead.  There is enough content though to keep you busy so it shouldn't leave you wanting too much.  There is so much deepthroating I can't imagine another movie would satiate some hunger the first few hundred movies didn't.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.  It would have been very nice to see some other guys involved to test her skills with some other dicks.  It's just her husband in every scene, and while his cock is big, it gets old seeing it over and over again.  There are some other girls on the site though for some lesbian and deepthroat action too with Heather.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I rarely if ever join oral related sites, but I just had to see more of her &amp;quot;deepthroating while the guy cums&amp;quot; action.  If you are a fan of deepthroating or just cumshots and such, you should probably give this site one go at least.  If for nothing else, you need to see what I'm talking about.  Seeing is believing with this.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=528&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit I DeepThroat&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23466&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23466&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 07:23:00 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23447</guid>
		<title>Ero Nata Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23447</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eronata/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/eronata.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Ero Nata&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/eronata/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ero Nata&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-15-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;11:03am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 65&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=5000&quot;&gt;alCapone&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=5000&quot;&gt;2&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Absolut cute girl&lt;br /&gt;
Easy navigation&lt;br /&gt;
three different picture resulution ( up to 2.912 x 4.368 pixels)&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures are not too much compressed (big sizes are ~1.5mb)&lt;br /&gt;
I'm not a big video fan, but the videos seems also good
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					It's mostly a NonNude page&lt;br /&gt;
Each set looks like the other (first with clothes, than show the breast)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'm sure, everybody will know this cutie (Helena from glamedeluxe and helensplanet, Natasha from Met-Art, and so on..).&lt;br /&gt;
For me it's unbelivable how a such boring site could exist with such a hottie&lt;br /&gt;
A real shame for the webmasters/producer of this site.&lt;br /&gt;
I recommend to stay away from this site.&lt;br /&gt;
If you like the girl, join another site where she is posing regular. The other sites knows how to make amazing photos.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=18167&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Ero Nata&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23447&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23447&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 11:03:09 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23393</guid>
		<title>Malina May Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23393</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/malinamay/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/malinamay.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Malina May&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/malinamay/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Malina May&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:30am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 67&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Good website design. &lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice photosets quality.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good monthly subscription price.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Small collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos quality is about average.&lt;br /&gt;
- No trial option offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- More download options for videos would be nice.&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not sure when updates come.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not much of variety.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/malinamay/&quot;&gt;Malina May&lt;/a&gt; is very hot but her site needs lots of improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, website's collection is kinda small and updates seem to come once or twice per month, thing that doesn't help site's collection to become larger.&lt;br /&gt;
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and their quality is very good. Videos can only be downloaded in one format (.mpeg) and their quality is average. More download options in here would definitely help. Videos length is short by the way.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is good and you will not have a problem with navigation. Content is exclusive but some photosets / videos look similar to each other.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is not high but there is no trial option offered for the ones who want to have an idea of what they are buying before having a full month membership.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no DRM videos protection and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). Also, I didn't notice a download limit. There is no hardcore content, which would be cool at my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I believe that this site has some good pros but surely need lots of improvement.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16966&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Malina May&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23393&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23393&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:30:15 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23392</guid>
		<title>Kora Kryk Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23392</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/korakryk/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/korakryk.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Kora Kryk&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/korakryk/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Kora Kryk&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-14-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;02:16am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 67&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Great photosets quality.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is easy.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Good monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Cool website design.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No hardcore content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets and videos collection needs growth.&lt;br /&gt;
- No trial option offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos quality is about average.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not much of variety in here.&lt;br /&gt;
- More download options for videos would help.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not sure when updates come.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/korakryk/&quot;&gt;Kora Kryk&lt;/a&gt; is a busty polish girl but her site needs a lot of work to be done.&lt;br /&gt;
Members have access to her photosets and videos.&lt;br /&gt;
Photosets can be downloaded in ZIP format and their quality is pretty good. Videos can be downloaded only in .mpeg and their quality is average. At this point, I think that more download options for videos would be cool.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is quite good and navigation is easy. Content is exclusive but I am not sure when updates come (from what I saw I believe that she updates her site once or twice per month). Site collection is not huge and photosets look similar to each other.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no DRM videos protection and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). I didn't notice a download limit. There is no hardcore content offered but some solo and lesbian scenes. Hardcore content would help this site look much better at my opinion.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is not high (20 USD / month) but there is no trial option offered in here as well.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I believe that the lack of updates,small collection, videos average quality and the missing of hardcore content turn this site down.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=16967&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Kora Kryk&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23392&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23392&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:16:42 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23388</guid>
		<title>Hanna&#39;s Honeypot Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23388</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hannahshoneypot/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/hannahshoneypot.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Hanna's Honeypot&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/hannahshoneypot/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Hanna's Honeypot&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (4)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-13-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10:29pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 85&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;MargulisAZ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=1834&quot;&gt;64&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					133 shoots (each shoot has a pic and vid set)&lt;br /&gt;
Excellent site navigation options and good site design.&lt;br /&gt;
Updates are decent, a new update every other day (cycles between a pic and vid set)&lt;br /&gt;
Tons of vidcaps to represent a video.&lt;br /&gt;
Videos have many download options and are of excellent quality.&lt;br /&gt;
Camera man in videos tends to be competent.&lt;br /&gt;
Get access to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlycuties/&quot;&gt;Onlycuties&lt;/a&gt; with this site's membership.&lt;br /&gt;
Upcoming update section is nice.&lt;br /&gt;
Search feature is useful.&lt;br /&gt;
Option to view all pics in a pic set on one page.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Pretty much just one girl, Hannah (Faith from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/alsscan/&quot;&gt;Alsscan&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br /&gt;
Scenes are very repetitive with her solo content.&lt;br /&gt;
Slow download speeds (averaged 150-200 kbps)&lt;br /&gt;
No interaction with Hannah (blogs, personal details, etc.)&lt;br /&gt;
Would be nice to be able to offer feedback and suggestions, but the only customer support options are through generic &amp;quot;tickets&amp;quot;.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					I'm kind of surprised this site is still going to be honest, since the updates are pretty frequent for a solo girl site and I haven't seen her do anything new anywhere else in quite some time.  Regardless, it is what it is and you are going to be getting a lot of Hannah here, or should I say Faith?  Hell, they all have a ton of names right.  So, onto some points of interest.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.  It's all about Hannah, for better or worse.  To be honest, the reason I joined the site was for a few of the girl/girl scenes (especially the ones with Jenifer), so if it was just her solo stuff I wouldn't bother.  By this time there have been a lot of sets and about a quarter of those or a little more is girl/girl, so it's not just Hannah, but mostly it is.  And the content is repetitive in her solo stuff, but I guess what else can you do with one girl but strip and masturbate huh?  Oh well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.  I'm a big fan of the navigation of this site, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlycuties/&quot;&gt;Onlycuties&lt;/a&gt;, and infocusgirls.  They all have the same setup and it works really well.  You can browse through past updates, pic sets, or video sets.  Also, there is a nice search feature so if you just want to find some good fisting content (of course I want to do that!) then it's just a few clicks away.  Also, I really like the fact that each video has multiple vidcaps, so I had no questions about whether I should download a movie or not.  And since the download speeds are pretty slow, this helped a lot as well.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.  You get full access to onlycuties with this site which is nothing to scoff at, as onlycuties is a fantastic site as well.  Keep that in mind when joining this site.  Perhaps if you are fan of Hannah and want a little of her you can get it here, then just pop on over to onlycuties for a bigger variety of models and content type.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, you know, this site isn't bad.  It's unusual for me to go through a site's navigation and also to go through viewing a site's material without frustration about something, and besides for the download speeds this site really didn't have anything else that made a big negative impression on me.  Of course, the fact that this site is Hannah dominated kills the variety to an extent, but at least there are some lesbo scenes to mix it up.  If I was a big fan of Hannah's this would be a dream come true, but like I said, I just joined for some of the lesbo scenes and girls.  Hey, I recommend this site, worst thing is that you can spend your time on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/onlycuties/&quot;&gt;Onlycuties&lt;/a&gt; instead.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=15810&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Hanna's Honeypot&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23388&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23388&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:29:01 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23298</guid>
		<title>Flower Tucci Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23298</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowertucci/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/flowertucci.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Flower Tucci&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowertucci/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Flower Tucci&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-11-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:16pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 72&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;badandy400&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=3791&quot;&gt;67&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Part of good network&lt;br /&gt;
Has same model in all videos, hence the name&lt;br /&gt;
Fair price, $25...only because of network&lt;br /&gt;
Extremely easy, clean navigation&lt;br /&gt;
Site does not require daily log in&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of hardcore and multiple girl scenes&lt;br /&gt;
Photos have zips&lt;br /&gt;
Videos are long
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					DOWNLOAD LIMIT, same as rest of network&lt;br /&gt;
NO LONGER UPDATING, what you see is what you get&lt;br /&gt;
Bit rates on videos needs improvement&lt;br /&gt;
Photos are of a small size&lt;br /&gt;
Not a lot of content&lt;br /&gt;
Could use more of the aspects of a model site
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					This site is really just a bonus to add to the rest of the network.  Unless you really have a thing for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/flowertucci/&quot;&gt;Flower Tucci&lt;/a&gt; this site does not support its command of $25 a month.  Hell with the 15 movie per day limit it would only take you 2 days to download the 28 videos.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The 28 videos are about 50 minutes a piece at 1.2 MBit/s.  This quality could use some work, but I would not expect to see anything since they are not even updating.  It would take 10.7 GB of your hard drive to get the videos and 1.03 GB to get the zipped photo sets.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The content of the scenes is nice though.  They also include some very attractive women for group action.  Many times there is three women including Flower.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, Flower herself is a rather good looking woman.  So I see absolutely no issue in seeing her in every scene.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Every scene is hardcore, which is good and bad.  I know a lot of people like hardcore, and I do too. But, I do like to see some pure lesbian videos especially when it is a site dedicated to a specif model.  Or perhaps a solo scene or two.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The site lost points mostly because it is not big enough and it is not updating.  I do not hold this against the network though.  I understand it is pretty hard to update a specific model site if she does not come back for anymore shoots.  The site would get an 85 if it were larger and at least still updating.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is certainly worth a look at, but mostly on as a secondary to other sites on the network.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=14344&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Flower Tucci&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23298&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23298&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:16:55 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23260</guid>
		<title>Ancilla Tilia Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23260</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ancillatilia/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/ancillatilia.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Ancilla Tilia&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ancillatilia/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ancilla Tilia&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-10-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;09:59am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Quality is very good (photosets).&lt;br /&gt;
- Regular updates.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Site has it's own personality.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Small video collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- No ZIP download option for photosets.&lt;br /&gt;
- No multiple download formats for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation needs improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- No trial option offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Infrequent diary updates.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos quality could be better.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/ancillatilia/&quot;&gt;Ancilla Tilia&lt;/a&gt; is surely one of the hottest Dutch girls online but her site needs surely improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to about 120+ galleries and 6 videos. ZIP download option for photosets is not available so you will have to download them one by one. Quality here is very good but the amount of some shots is small. As I said above there are only 6 videos offered for download in .wmv format and there quality is about average. Surely more videos and more download options would make site look better.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is quite good but navigation needs improvement as there is no search feature and it's kinda confusing. I didn't notice a download limit and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). Moreover, there is no DRM video protection and updates come mostly every 3-4 days.&lt;br /&gt;
There are some bonus galleries of Ancilla's members weating for download as few wallpapers.Also, there is a members forum.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is expensive for a single model's website (30 USD recurring at 23 USD) plus there is no trial option offered. Content is mostly exclusive but her diary updates infrequently.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I think that this site has surely it's own personality and unique content but the lack of videos and few other cons turns it down.&lt;br /&gt;
You can try it if you are into such content.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=13341&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Ancilla Tilia&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23260&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23260&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 09:59:52 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23218</guid>
		<title>Nikki Benz Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23218</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nikkibenz/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/nikkibenz.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Nikki Benz&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nikkibenz/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nikki Benz&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (2)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;06:25am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Huge photosets and videos collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- ZIP download option for photosets available.&lt;br /&gt;
- Bonus content offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Hardcore content.&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good photos and videos quality.&lt;br /&gt;
- Trial option (full access).&lt;br /&gt;
- Very good website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is very easy.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- More download options for videos would be cool.&lt;br /&gt;
- Updates could come faster.&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- More hardcore photosets and videos of Nikki would be good.&lt;br /&gt;
- Old content quality needs improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
- Download limit.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/nikkibenz/&quot;&gt;Nikki Benz&lt;/a&gt; is one of the hottest pornstars online and her site is very good but needs some small improvements.&lt;br /&gt;
Members have access to about 155+ photosets and 330+ videos so there is lots of content in here.&lt;br /&gt;
ZIP download option for photosets is available and their quality is very good (newest content).&lt;br /&gt;
Videos can be downloaded in parts or as full length movies in .wmv or quicktime format. Some more download options for videos would be definitely good. Old content's quality is about average.&lt;br /&gt;
Website's design is pretty good and navigation is very easy so you will not find a problem with that. There are bonus galleries and videos of Nikki's friends and some cool wallpapers.&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly subscription price is high for a single model's website but there is a cool full access trial option.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no DRM videos protection and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). There is a download limit of about 1 Gb per 6 hours. Updates come weekly and I think that could come a big faster plus some more Nikki's hardcore photosets and videos could be nice.&lt;br /&gt;
In conclusion, I really enjoyed this website and if you like Nikki then I think that you should definitely try it.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nikkibenz.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Nikki Benz&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23218&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23218&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:25:00 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23215</guid>
		<title>Natural Joanna Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23215</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naturaljoanna/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/naturaljoanna.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Natural Joanna&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naturaljoanna/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Natural Joanna&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:51am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 68&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
- Nice website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation is pretty good.&lt;br /&gt;
- Weekly updates.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Very small site.&lt;br /&gt;
- Videos are offered only in one format.&lt;br /&gt;
- No ZIP download option for photos.&lt;br /&gt;
- No full length videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- No trial option.&lt;br /&gt;
- There is a daily limit (500 Mb).&lt;br /&gt;
- Expensive (according to site's collection at the moment).&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore content offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photos and videos quality is about average.&lt;br /&gt;
- No contact with Joanna.&lt;br /&gt;
- More download option for videos would be cool.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/naturaljoanna/&quot;&gt;Natural Joanna&lt;/a&gt; is a softcore adult website which surely needs work.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to about 20 photosets and 30 videos. ZIP download option for photosets is not provided by the website so you will have to download them one by one, which is pretty boring at my opinion, quality is average. Videos can only be downloaded in one format (.wmv) and their quality is also average. Videos are offered is parts so there is no full length download option.&lt;br /&gt;
Website design is pretty good and navigation is very easy. There is no download limit and downloading was fast for me (most hours of day). There is a daily download limit of 500 Mb but I don't thing that this would be a problem as site's collection is not huge enough to reach it.&lt;br /&gt;
There is no trial option offered and monthly subscription price is high (at my opinion) as site's collection, at the moment, is small.&lt;br /&gt;
Content is exclusive but there is no hardcore scenes or photosets also members can not contant with Joanna. Updates come every week and I think that should come faster to help site's collection grow faster.&lt;br /&gt;
Personally, I believe that Joanna is extremely hot but her site needs lots of work and updates.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/out.php?id=11539&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Natural Joanna&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23215&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23215&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:51:47 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23214</guid>
		<title>Maxi Mounds Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23214</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/maximounds/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/maximounds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Maxi Mounds&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/maximounds/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Maxi Mounds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-09-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;05:38am&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 70&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=384&quot;&gt;roseman&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=384&quot;&gt;206&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- Exclusive content.&lt;br /&gt;
- No DRM videos protection.&lt;br /&gt;
- No download limit.&lt;br /&gt;
- Inexpensive monthly subscription price.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good photosets collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- Good website design.&lt;br /&gt;
- Downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					- No trial option offered.&lt;br /&gt;
- No ZIP download option for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Small videos collection.&lt;br /&gt;
- No hardcore content.&lt;br /&gt;
- DVDs are not offered with membership.&lt;br /&gt;
- Navigation could be better.&lt;br /&gt;
- Photosets and videos quality is average.&lt;br /&gt;
- No multiple download options for videos.&lt;br /&gt;
- Not sure when site updates.&lt;br /&gt;
- No bonus content offered with membership.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/maximounds/&quot;&gt;Maxi Mounds&lt;/a&gt; is surely one of the hottest big boobs girls online but her personal website surely needs some improvement.&lt;br /&gt;
First of all, members have access to about 85+ photosets and 30+ videos. Quality is average plus ZIP download option for photosets is not provided and videos can only be downloaded in one format (.mpg), more video download options would be great at this point. &lt;br /&gt;
Website's design is good but navigation surely needs improvement. Collection is kinda small if you are looking for videos but photosets amount is not bad. There is no download limit or DRM videos protection plus downloading was fast for me (most hours of day).&lt;br /&gt;
Monthly membership price is not high for a single model's site but there is no trial option offered for the ones who want to have an idea of what they are buying.&lt;br /&gt;
Content is mostly exclusive but I am not sure when site updates. Members can buy Maxi's DVDs (which include hardcore) but I believe that some of their scenes should be included to membership.&lt;br /&gt;
In general lines, site's quality is about average, content is unique and there is lots of variety if you are one of Maxi's big fans.
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.maximounds.com&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Visit Maxi Mounds&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23214&quot;&gt;View Replies&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=23214&quot;&gt;Add Reply&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/td&gt;

			&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;/table&gt;
		&lt;br&gt;</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 05:38:28 PDT</pubDate>
	</item>
	<item>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">pornusers_23195</guid>
		<title>Ariel&#39;s Blog Review</title>
		<link>http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=23195</link>
		<description>&lt;table width=&quot;100%&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot;&gt;

			&lt;tr valign=&quot;top&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td align=&quot;center&quot; width=&quot;190&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/arielsblog/&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/arielsblog.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Enter Ariel's Blog&quot; width=&quot;158&quot; height=&quot;135&quot; border=&quot;0&quot;&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/arielsblog/&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;Ariel's Blog&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (1)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					08-08-08&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;04:53pm&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;REVIEW = 82&lt;/b&gt; by &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=940&quot;&gt;Drooler&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=940&quot;&gt;146&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Pros:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					+Ariel (aka &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/piperfawn/&quot;&gt;Piper Fawn&lt;/a&gt;):  A fully blossomed, all-natural 24-year-old woman with girlish, sometimes mischievous charms.  She looks closer to 19.&lt;br /&gt;
+Clean, clear, straightfoward site design&lt;br /&gt;
+Login right on the home page (no clicking for it)&lt;br /&gt;
+Exclusive content, even within the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;Watch4Beauty&lt;/a&gt; collection of sites&lt;br /&gt;
+Total of 87 “nude art” photosets so far (back to late Sept. 2007)&lt;br /&gt;
+”Backstage” photosets (17 so far) might provide some additions to some “nude art” ones&lt;br /&gt;
+17 “real life” photosets (but not that interesting unless you and she have friends in common, IMHO)&lt;br /&gt;
+Photos in 3 sizes (1200’s, 2000’s, and large at least in 3872px)&lt;br /&gt;
+Zips in all three sizes&lt;br /&gt;
+Videos in iPod (640x480); QT and WMV 720x576&lt;br /&gt;
+Updates continue (unlike every other single-model &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pornusers.com/review/watch4beauty/&quot;&gt;Watch4Beauty&lt;/a&gt; site)&lt;br /&gt;
+Users can rate photosets and videos&lt;br /&gt;
+Active fans’ forum&lt;br /&gt;
+Members get discount rates to other W4B sites (“links” page)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Cons:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					-Some photosets emphasize the “art” at the expense of enjoyable nudity&lt;br /&gt;
-Blurriness, darkness, graininess, strange skin coloring (especially red) in some of the photosets&lt;br /&gt;
-A small number of black &amp;amp; white photosets&lt;br /&gt;
-Watermark on photos can be annoying&lt;br /&gt;
-Not many videos.  8 in “nude” art and 6 each in “backstage” and “real life”&lt;br /&gt;
-Some videos may bore (Ariel looking into space) or frustrate with all of the cutting and splicing&lt;br /&gt;
-Videos usually under 5 min. (may be a pro for some)&lt;br /&gt;
-Somewhat irregular photo or video updates, but 3 per week on average for all types&lt;br /&gt;
-“Search” box shows only on the home page; good only for searching titles of updates&lt;br /&gt;
-Server rather slow (rarely &amp;gt; 400kbps; 20mbps connection)
					&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					&lt;b&gt;Bottom Line:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
					Ariel has a face that can project many nuances of mood with her eyes and mouth.  She can look right into the camera and “connect” with a grin, an arched eyebrow, a startled stare, etc.  She is one-of-a-kind and yet she possesses a chameleon-like versatility.  This really shows when a good makeup artist or hairdresser is involved.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One video that drives this home is “Valentine day” (Feb. 14, 2008).  You really get the feeling that you’re right there with her as she caresses herself and looks straight into the camera.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It’s too bad that it was an exception.  The same goes for photosets with her looking away, looking down, keeping her eyes closed.  In other words, the “spark” that she can create would have ignited more often had those on the production end of things been more conscious of capturing it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But there were some nice photosets here, for sure.  Some of the real standouts include “Desert Rose,” “Green Tea,” “I Like My Bed,” “Wood Nymph,” and especially “My Lamp” and “Palm.”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I also thought the video &amp;quot;Wanted for beauty&amp;quot; was good as unique v