PU - Fetish - New Reviews

Pure CFNM Review

Mon, 11 Aug 2008 08:37:14 PDT

Pure CFNM (2)

08-11-08 08:37am

REVIEW = 76 by mbaya (40)

Pros:
-Simple website to navigate. All the videos were available in one section and had a few screen shots and a plot summary.
-143 videos, each about 15 to 20 minutes long. You can download clips or the entire video at once.
-Mostly outstandingly beautiful women, nicely dressed, made up, hair, etc. Appear to be someone you could meet if you were very lucky. Nothing like the typical pornstar look.
-No download limit or DRM.
-Many interesting fantasies. Imagine a bj or a handjob by a group of excited, enthusiastic women who see men as sex objects. Mostly they ask for nothing in return and cooperate to give the man pure pleasure.
-Very active member forum with thousands of posts.

Cons:
-Videos are 640x480, 777 kbps. Not the best quality.
-Some videos downloaded without sound.
-The dialog is in regional or nonstandard Britsh English, not the BBC English Americans are used to. Often incomprehensible.
-Does not work with Free Download Manager.
-The photos cannot be downloaded as a zip file.
-They are all screenshots from the video and many of the parts I liked were not available as a photo.
-Does not have bonus material and is not part of any network. What you get is just the website. This makes this too expensive.

Bottom Line:
Honestly I did not know what to expect when I signed up. I have never seen CFNM before. The emphasis is definitely on fantasy and not the explicit sex and nudity you can find in mainstream porn.The videos break down as about 25% better than to be expected; highly erotic videos that can compare to the best in mainstream porn. About 25% were pretty good and the remaining 50% had problems in my opinion. Some repeated storylines and were totally uninspired. They were simply following a formula with no chemistry among the actors. I did not at all enjoy those humiliating men or watching men jerk off and women laughing at them. The women were mostly pornstars, not amateurs.You can check the link to the models and see for yourself who is who. I was expecting a site with appeal for women, but these men were mostly overweight, too skinny, old, etc. No better for women than mainstream. The members forum had thousands of posts, but I could not find a single one from a woman. The breakdown of the action was about 20% blow jobs, 60% handjobs, and 20% males masturbating. Many members asked repeatedly for more skin, more explicit shots of the women showing underwear,cumming on their clothes, more bj's etc. I agree.

Visit Pure CFNM - View Replies - Add Reply

Flexible Positions Review

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:17:48 PDT

Flexible Positions (1)

08-08-08 04:17pm

REVIEW = 77 by atrapat (34)

Pros:
-Scenes shot at a couple different private gyms.
-Models are dressed in work out clothes.
-Focuses more on the workout theme than flexibility.
-10 scenes so far. Launched recently.
-All models are well known USA porn stars. Big fake boobs on all of them.
-If you want flexibility, check Angelina Valentine or Maya Gates' scenes. Little flexibility in other scenes.
-Audrey Bitoni or Rachel Roxxx aren't that flexible but put up very naughty performances.
-Accessible from Porn Pros Network. Check my review there for further pros and cons.

Cons:
-Scene structure and the type of workout are always the same. It can get repetitive.
-Last scene was released almost a month ago.
-Most models aren't flexible at all. Most don't know how to use the gym machines.
-Viewer should be flexible too. The camera is often rotated 90 degrees.
-Lots of attention to boobs, little to asses. Strange for a workout site.
-Cameraman/director talks a lot and gives instructions aloud during the scene.
-Male performer (Anthony Rosano) is the same in 90% of the scenes. He does OK but he's all over this network.
-Check Porn Pros Network site tour for a quick list of scenes with dates.
-The usual drawbacks of Porn Pros Network.

Bottom Line:
This site is somewhat of a misnomer. The Flexible Positions are rarely little more than a leg in the air or laying on a big soft gym ball during the sex. The scenes aren't that bad, though. The models are top porn stars and they look great. But the sex in most scenes wouldn't look out of place in a different setting: instead of fucking on a couch, they do it on the bench of a gym machine. A gym floor is just like any other floor. The big soft ball is probably the only unique element and certainly makes for a couple new and interesting positions.

The scene structure is always the same:
1) Girl works out alone on various gym machines; usually while talking to cameraman.
2) The "trainer" joins in and shows her "how to do it", groping and licking a bit more than a real trainer would.
3) Regular sex scene using the gym elements and a few more flexible than usual positions. The big soft ball is quite a find.

Parts 1 and 2 take up usually a third of the scene and are what set apart the site. You get to see several of the models running for a short while with their tits flying free. Quite a nice and unusual view. They also seem to do it for real getting to pant and sweat a bit. They also work on other machines trying to showcase their best assets (tits, mainly; why not the asses too?). Nice use of the thighmaster. When the male performer enters the stage, they often repeat some of the exercises while he gropes or directly licks them as they work out. There's no kind of script at all. Scenes usually get stuck in a middle point between acting and not acting. The male performer is always introduced as a trainer and he uses lots of gym jargon but the girls never pretend to be surprised when he goes straight to lick their tits or pussy. They know from the start what they are here for. They should script their scenes a little more or leave aside this trainer fallacy.

The site would be much more interesting if the scenes were more like the one with Angelina Valentine. She displays her usual enthusiasm and pulls some nice tricks: she does splits to the guys cock, gives him head while hanging upside down from one of the machines or gets licked while doing a back bent. Maya Gates has never done if for me, but she puts up what's probably the most remarkable scene: a very flexible performance with lots of different positions; she and her "trainer" make good use of her ability to sustain a back bent.

I have a soft spot for Audrey Bitoni and Rachel Roxxx. Both aren't that flexible but they put up some pretty good scenes here. It would make sense if they got their own Deep Throat Love scene (very recommendable site in this same network) as they show here they have what it takes to be there. Just as Deep Throat Love only hires models who can deep throat, maybe Flexible Positions should consider hiring models who can honor the site's name.

Visit Flexible Positions - View Replies - Add Reply

Sleep Creep Review

Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:12:40 PDT

Sleep Creep (1)

08-08-08 04:12pm

REVIEW = 65 by atrapat (34)

Pros:
-Caters to a sex while sleeping fetish.
-14 scenes. Last one released 6 days ago.
-Most models are good looking newbies.
-Most are all-natural you girls with few tattoos.
-Very little makeup brings verisimilitude to the scene.
-Missy Stone and Brynn Tyler look hot.
-Convincing acting.
-Interesting mix of POV and fixed camera.
-Was accessible via Porn Pros Network.

Cons:
-Most models pretend to stay sleep and unresponsive during the whole scene.
-Scene page on the site contains a story that explains the girls are OK with what happens. But the scenes don't show any of the story's details.
-Scene structure is always the same. Every scene feels like a remake.
-The usual drawbacks of Porn Pros Network.
-Site has disappeared from the network tour site list since a couple of days ago !?.
-The same male perfomer in 90% of the scenes (Anthony Rosano).

Bottom Line:
Scenes always follow this structure: guy sneaks camera in hand into a room where a young girl is sleeping in bra and panties; he slowly undresses her, trying not to wake her up, all the time groping and fingering her; he leaves the camera where it can catch all the action, takes out his cock, pokes her a little bit and starts having sex quietly with her till the money shot as the girl remains asleep. It's just as creepy as it sounds. In only 3 (Rachel Starr, Shawna Lenne and Veronique Vega) of the 12 scenes that were available while I was a member, the girl pretends to wake up and catch the guy (the scene continues with the girl's cooperation; she remains somewhat sleepy but is always happy to find herself in such a situation); in the rest of the scenes, the model pretends to be asleep the whole time.

Those who don't "wake up" are usually quite new to the industry but, of course, there's little doubt that they agreed to be filmed that way, signed their model releases, etc. Among them, there are a couple of rising stars like Missy Stone or Brynn Tyler. I believe some BDSM sites shoot a short segment at the end of the scenes where performers, now dressed in civilian clothes, talk about what they just did so viewers are assured that what happened was consensual. I'm not saying they should do this here but maybe the girls should always pretend to wake up as they already do in those 3 scenes. Another option would be to add a behind the scenes clip. I am sure the performers couldn't help but crack up at some point while filming. It would also be funny if they could release a scene where the one sleeping was the guy.

If the fact that the girl stays asleep until the end of the scene is extremely important to the fetish, maybe they could shoot a short acting intro where the girl tells the guy she's OK with that. In fact, the main page for each episode always has a short story where they justify the situation; things like "she was familiar with my particular fantasy" or "deeply asleep, willing to let me do my thing". It's quite obvious they've added that as an afterthought as the scenes always have the same structure but the stories vary quite a lot in the details.

Creepy details aside, there are some pretty young all-natural newbies here. There's little more to be said, if you are into this kind of thing you'll probably like it. I felt, though, that model's response and the guy's performance (always the same guy) is pretty much interchangeable from scene to scene. They all make a pretty good job. So, if your fetish isn't exactly the same as the one depicted in a particular scene it's unlikely that you'll find another one that better suits your taste.

Visit Sleep Creep - View Replies - Add Reply

Fetish Bunker Review

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 02:43:31 PDT

Fetish Bunker (0)

07-25-08 02:43am

REVIEW = 85 by Ergo Proxy (4)

Pros:
Fetish Bunker has high quality photosets with resolutions up to 800x1200 pixels and a small collection of videos. Their main focus is on latex catsuits, but different outfits are also widely represented (like masks, high heels, skirts, dresses etc.). Both studio and outdoor shoots are presented masterly concerning lighting and image definition. The current size of their galleries is 4800 pics in 96 sets. Their main models (Helly, Christy and Tash) are very appealing and sexy. It must be emphasized that the creative handling of the latex fetish is very refreshing and energetic here since it is a site operated by private fetishistic people as their hobby.

Cons:
By far the biggest con is the user interface of their site. It relies heavily on Flash animations and is quite a pain in the ass. Every picture of a gallery first opens in a small preview window where you can "scan" it with a second small preview window like a magnifier. The original picture opens in a pop up window if you click again on the preview picture. The scrolling in one gallery is fully animated and annoying. To change the gallery itself you have to click back to the main menu and start from the very beginning.
The second biggest con is that they don't have .zip archives of their galleries. If you plan to copy a whole gallery to your PC it takes a lot of time if you don't have automated download tools.
A further con could be the small video section (.wmv,.avi,.rm formats, mostly 480x640) but it is clear that their main focus is on pictures. One should also be aware that all their videos are with music, ranging from classical music to Techno beats.

Bottom Line:
As I have already said, at present the biggest con is the user interface of their site. The good news is that they are currently working to improve it. Another point is that they don't show any intimate parts of the models (boobies are no problem and are sometimes uncovered). If they appear by chance they are coated by a Fetish Bunker logo. According to the sites administrator this is partly because of difficult laws about nudity and pornography in their country and partly because the models are non-professional posers and no porn models. I think this should be unproblematic if one is mainly interested in the latex fetish. I think a main drawback for some people could rather be that the main models of the site consist only of 2-3 women. Personally this was no problem for me since the sets are very diversified. So there is only a little chance for boredom. As I can say for now updates come regularly one times per week.
What I have not discussed so far is the price of 22$ per month which is quite high. But it is a niche content so it may be partly justified.
Finally, I would recommend this site. You will find many unique pictures here that will surely satisfy ones fetishistic needs for quite a time.

Visit Fetish Bunker - View Replies - Add Reply

Fets.com Review

Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:12:19 PDT

Fets.com (2)

07-21-08 08:12am

REVIEW = 80 by dilbert4100 (6)

Pros:
-Lots of content
-Wide variety of different costumes
-Photos are excellent in quality
-Relatively inexpensive
-Users are allowed the opportunity to suggest different costuming and uniform ideas

Cons:
-ZIP File downloads are only available for newer photo sets
-Many of the girls aren't that great looking
-No hardcore content be it lesbian, straight sex, or even masturbation
-Navigation could use a lot of work
-Updates are rather slow in development - one page of a new photo set per week, meaning it could be a few weeks before all of them are available

Bottom Line:
I love roleplaying, which makes me instantly love this site. FETS.com has pretty much every niche of female costumes you could think of and probably some you haven't thought of. That alone makes this site worthwhile.

That said, there are a few problems. First off, navigation is kind of hard to figure out. The best bet is to simply choose a girl and search out everything she has rather than look for anything else. Lack of ZIP files also is a detriment to this site. Many of the picture sets have well over 100 photos, which means right clicking and saving each pic individually for most of the sets.

While it is obvious this is an amateur modeling site, many of the models, I feel, are hovering around average in terms of looks.

On a more personal note, I also felt that there were too many pic sets with pantyhose. I'm much more of a fan of stockings and thigh highs. I know that many folks like pantyhose, but their usage greatly outnumbered the use of the other hosieries.

I won't spend any time deriding the video galleries. This is a softcore site, and I generally find those videos too boring to be worth my time.

Overall, this isn't a bad site, however. I tend to concentrate on the negatives because thats what everyone really needs to know about. If you can get passed these, then I do recommend FETS.com. It is one of the few sites out there that really caters to people who like looking at girls in wearing and undressing from different uniforms and costumes.

Visit Fets.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Get Right Network Review

Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:05:26 PDT

Get Right Network (3)

07-16-08 06:05am

REVIEW = 55 by ace of aces (92)

Pros:
+ high dl speed (if it runs)
+ exclusive content
+ no drm
+ no dl limit (but hard work to download videos at all)
+ hd films
+ mass videos
+ nice content
+ mass sites (hm not really good)

Cons:
- inconstant dl speeds
- download breaks
- few dl in one part (arround 5%)
- movies are split up in up to 9 (!) parts
- no real movie names (ca 90%)
- medium-low quality
- very few hd-films (arround 3%) with semi quality
- very expansive
- navigation is a desaster
- very slow site (sometimes even not possible to get to)
- bad login system (user/pw)

Bottom Line:
this site seem to split the users.

for me it`s a site with great oppertunities which ends in absolutly desaster.

only realy thing to figure out positiv is the great number of videos with typical (russian/east european) content.

all other is ***t.

you can download the videos with fantastic names like "full", "1" or "video". If you try to download the videos without download manager you have to try several times to downlad a file, because the downloading stops, whenever it wants to.

If you have the DAP as download manager then you have to put in EVERY time username and password. you can`t chose username and password so u have brillinat pw or usernames like "UHgn69dFbeOO". i can only say HAPPY HELLOWEEN

in my opinion, if you are not able to download the videos fast and easy, then all the fun is gone.
Beside the navigation is a desaster. the site broke up several times, so you have to refresh plenty times. also the update system is a mess.

once again i was trapped. as a matter of fact that there are so many sites in that package, i joined several months ago that site...and untill now, no change of quality!

sorry, but even when it offers very much videos, all in all it offers very little.
it`s lightyears from beeing a average site.

Visit Get Right Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Get Right Network Review

Sun, 13 Jul 2008 21:26:13 PDT

Get Right Network (3)

07-13-08 09:26pm

REVIEW = 83 by Chipster (2)

Pros:
-Original content
-Lots of scenes
-Used to be an 'incest' site, names changed but scenes are the same
- Lots of threesomes , young and old women with men
-Attractive models, both young and old
-picture sets offered in zip
- Videos are split, downloadable in zip packets
- Lots of FFM scenes

Cons:
-No model search
-Some scenes are duplicated in different sites
- Updates are not dated
- Updates may have stopped
-Creampies are baking soda, gushers
- Too many strapons in the ffm scenes, like the guy can't handle it by himself

Bottom Line:
There is a lot of content over the 18 plus sites, many use the same models, which have been seen on other Russian sites. This is a good site to join for 30 days to take in all of the scenes. I rejoined after being away for a year and am still enjoying the scenes today.

Visit Get Right Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Thin Fetish Review

Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:29:49 PDT

Thin Fetish (1)

07-04-08 01:29pm

REVIEW = 68 by BostonPJR (72)

Pros:
- This is a hard-to-find niche and thinfetish is the most recent site to highlight it.
- The girls are mostly young, attractive and skinnier than the usual fare on the next-best sites like Hegre.
- Forum has posts from defunct sites of long lost forgotten skinnies- some quite extreme -for the real thin beauty lovers out there.

Cons:
-Two, count 'em, two videos!
- Has not updated since March. It's pretty much being kept alive by the forum. But it's basically life support at this point.
- Variety is lacking and half of the (six) women are hardly beautiful by any conventional opinion. Others aren't quite as thin as you'd expect, or hope for.

Bottom Line:
If you're desperate for new content of girls so skinny you probably won't find them anywhere else, then thinfetish is worth a look. In our ballooning society, it's 900 times easier to find bbw and bw (minus the b for beautiful) porn sites, than one that appreciates the girls on the other end of the sexy spectrum. And for that reason only, thinfetish is a site I'd still recommend. If only to grab all the content you can before this site shuts down completely. There are some sexy models that I wish I could find somewhere else (like the sexy bald Kate), but as for this site, it's days are numbered.

Visit Thin Fetish - View Replies - Add Reply

Get Right Network Review

Wed, 21 May 2008 19:20:19 PDT

Get Right Network (3)

05-21-08 07:20pm

REVIEW = 60 by blaze588 (5)

Pros:
- lots of mature women
- different kids of sex - pissing,old women with young men, old women fucking young men, old women lesbo, 3 somes
-trial membership gives u full acces. pricey though $10

Cons:
- almost impossible to navigate.
- the favorites don't work
- out of 300 videos only 20+ are full downloadable
- only 4 wone to a page, with 300 videos, that's alot of pages to navigate
- videos broken down into 4 parts, 20mb per video

Bottom Line:
alot of women, bad design, do the trial, it gives u full access to the sites. the pissing site suck.

Visit Get Right Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Orgasms Denied Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 22:57:11 PDT

Orgasms Denied (0)

05-08-08 10:57pm

REVIEW = 85 by teaseme (0)

Pros:
Great if your into Orgasm Denial, Edging, teasing etc.

Lots of captions, interactive web teases.

Thousands of DVD quality videos.

Chat and email orgasm denial instructions from a fantastic mistress.

Exclusive orgasm denial and femdom video clips to download.

Cons:
Would be nice to see live entertainment like live web cam shows or something

Bottom Line:
This is a great site if you're into teaseing and orgasm denial and like to stroke to the edge but not be allowed to cum till a mistress lets you. Check it out and you will get a set of painful blue balls.

Visit Orgasms Denied - View Replies - Add Reply

Stretching Sessions Review

Tue, 18 Mar 2008 15:38:22 PDT

Stretching Sessions (1)

03-18-08 03:38pm

REVIEW = 72 by MargulisAZ (64)

Pros:
Most of the girls are young and thin. Not all are attractive but many are.
Pics and video of every scene.
Movies can be downloaded as parts or as a full clip either in WMV or MPEG formats.
Streaming option is available.
Quite a bit of decent pussy stretching.
A few bonus sites with membership.
Trial membership seems to actually be a full membership indefinitely? (a fluke maybe?)

Cons:
Updates are very sporadic and random.
Scenes are generally very short (10-15 minutes).
Newer scenes are less focused on pussy stretching.
Videos for download size is only 640 x 480 for new movies and smaller in older movies.
Streaming size is ridiculously small.
Download speed for MPG movie format is VERY slow for some reason.

Bottom Line:
If you are like me and enjoy watching pussies get stretched and opened, this site may be worth a trial membership. I say trial because it is a full trial even though it says limited. Also, I joined a LONG time ago under the "limited trial option" and have canceled my membership long ago, but yet I'm still a member with full benefits. Why? I have no idea.

The content of this site kind of lives up to the bill. Kind of. There are a few scenes and girls where it really is just constant pussy stretching, usually the older scenes. But for the last 6-12 months ALMOST all of the updates seem to focus more on just regular hardcore sex than anything else. Yes, there will usually be some pussy stretching for a minute before the sex and blowjob starts, but that's about it. It's almost like they give the token quick stretch to make it qualify for the site and then it's just generic the rest of the time. This is the most frustrating thing about the site in my opinion.

Also, the scenes are ultra short. Considering that the updates are very random and infrequent, you would think they could come up with more than 10 or 15 minutes worth of material. It's especially frustrating when only 10-20% of that time is spent on pussy stretching too.

The girls are usually fairly attractive, I will give them that. The highlight has to be Sophia. She is very pretty and toned, and man can her pussy stretch. There are a couple duds in the mix too but overall they aren't bad models

Visit Stretching Sessions - View Replies - Add Reply

Get Right Network Review

Sun, 16 Mar 2008 05:50:18 PDT

Get Right Network (3)

03-16-08 05:50am

REVIEW = 90 by guvner (8)

Pros:
- A really great website if you're looking for once stunning Eastern European women who now look like they've been around the block a few times.
- Lots of content; several hundred videos and photosets.
- Video quality is suprising good in general. Mostly the resolution is 640x480 and no videos are above around 250mb in size.
- Most of the videos and photosets are easy to download.
- Most content is women between 30-40 years old being fucked by a young guy or guys, with some teen stuff too.
- Plenty of variety; 1-on-1, group, lesbian, strapon, fake cum, pissing, drunk teens.

Cons:
- Content isn't dated, so it's difficult to see whether content is being updated or not.
- The website navigation isn't great and could really do with a total revamp.
- Some broken links.
- Language barrier. ALL videos are in Russian or Eastern Europeans dialects.
- Most videos are split into 4 or 5 chunks.
- About 25% of photosets aren't zipped up.
- There is some 80s/90s American glamour filler photosets, which is pretty dire and totally out of place.

Bottom Line:
If you're looking for a site pretty much dedicated to real-life Russian/Eastern European moms and MILFs, you can't go far wrong with this website.

It just needs a new lick of paint for the design and navigation, and the crappy American filler content to be removed and replaced with new updated content.

Visit Get Right Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Tickle Horror Review

Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:25:23 PST

Tickle Horror (0)

03-04-08 09:25pm

REVIEW = 95 by Porn Lover (0)

Pros:
100% Original content and good quality with different options to download in different sizes.

I also like they way they give you full download options and some of the older movies are downloadable in sections.

Cons:
There are loads of bonus sites and bonus DVD's that come with the membership, but they were not really what i was looking for... still it was nice to have them and would be better if they were more into the fetish style of content.

Bottom Line:
Good site with regular updates and worth the membership as this content must be hard to produce, but sure is worth it.

Visit Tickle Horror - View Replies - Add Reply

House Of Taboo Review

Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:11:50 PST

House Of Taboo (3)

01-28-08 09:11am

REVIEW = 83 by apoctom (142)

Pros:
- Hundreds of fetish videos, organized by theme
- No DRM
- Videos available as single-file downloads
- Newer scenes have hi-def options: wmv & divx 720p
- All scenes have picture sets associated.
- Picture sets have zip file option.

Cons:
- Slow download speeds (less than 500 KB/sec)
- Updates are not as frequent as on other DDF sites. I would put it roughly 1 or 2 updates per week.

Bottom Line:
I joined this site as part of the year-end 2-for-1 deal on DDF sites. I picked it for 2 reasons: I wanted something a little different and I enjoy a good fetish site every once in a while. I was not disappointed by the content, but the execution was a little below par.

The majority of the models are European, but I was surprised to see so many American women on the site, like Amy Ried, Inari Vachs, and Violet Blue. There are some very entertaining scenes, as well as some that I didn't know I would find erotic, like age-play. I ran into a problem a couple of times where the model listed for a scene wouldn't show up in the Model (Our Girls) Index. That made it a bit harder to find scenes featuring some very hot Euro models. Not a huge complaint, but an annoyance.

I also didn't enjoy the really slow download speeds. It improved over the course of my membership as DDF added more servers to handle demand, but downloading hi-def content at 500KB/sec is pretty painful.

I wish that the site would update more often. I know that it is a niche site, but compared to its sister sites, House of Taboo waits a long time between updates. There are also a few scenes where the message "Video coming soon..." has been up for weeks.

Overall, I liked the content. Some of the fetishes were not my taste, like watersports. But I did enjoy the bondage and spanking sections. I doubt I would join as a full-price member, but I am glad that I used my free visit on this site.

Visit House Of Taboo - View Replies - Add Reply

House Of Taboo Review

Sun, 30 Dec 2007 13:30:36 PST

House Of Taboo (3)

12-30-07 01:30pm

REVIEW = 82 by mr smut (13)

Pros:
+ great content and lots of tasty models
+ video quality has improved a lot since I was there for the last time (no DRM)
+ Image quality is now better and the newest sets are 2000pixels for the long side (which is an increase of about 400pixels)
+ ZIP files are now 1 per set conveniently downloadable from the first thumbnail page for each update

Cons:
- image quality varies between acceptable and fantastic
- sometimes it's not exactly clear to me why a set is shown at HOT (e.g. Sasha shaving her legs)
- some broken or missing links
- in the members area there is no information given about the update schedule

Bottom Line:
Content is divided into different sections like spanking, bondage, roleplay, latex fetish and watersports.

The navigational features are somewhat annoying because it's hard to keep track where you came from or to find specific content e.g. when searching for a special model. I found a broken link for one set with Laura M. and Nelli but was at least able to find that one on the spanking page. One set was split up into 3 subset which are scattered around in 2 different categories.
The worst thing is to not know when the site gets updated. This is a real nuisance as 1by-day for instance gets updated twice per day.

For some models information is missing and it would be nice to get a hint where you can find them on other DDF sites. Lucky enough I found at least chubby Laura M. and her massive 40F breast on DDF Busty.

The new videos offer good quality � though still not as excellent as the videos from ALS Scan for instance - but only for the picture itself as the audio tracks still seem to be a problem for those who record or edited the movies.

HOT offers a lot of different content but IMHO it still needs more to offer. It seems as if updates do now come more than once per week. I'll keep an eye on that and let you know as soon as I know more. The content itself is very good and I enjoy to see for instance Cloe getting fisted, Dorthy Black or Daria training their female slaves and not to forget to see pregnant Violet Blue being submissive.

Visit House Of Taboo - View Replies - Add Reply

Gyno X Review

Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:46:08 PST

Gyno X (1)

12-11-07 12:46am

REVIEW = 77 by nungman (1)

Pros:
Quality/definition of videos; cameraman gets the most out of a single, hand-held camera; many models are young, some are pretty; a great deal of material for the money; long sequences divided in up to six episodes around seven minutes each make downloading easy with no restrictions; action is highly realistic.

Cons:
Dialogue is in Czech language; English subtitles are downright weird, done by someone with a dictionary and unfamiliar with English; the action is TOO real--these are GENUINE medical/gyno examinations apparently done by real doctors in a clinical setting and using up-to-date medical equipment. The girls are fully compliant, unemotional. don't look to be acting, even answer standard medical questions. Extreme closeups of genitalia become tedious. Effect is uncomfortable NOT erotic.

Bottom Line:
Unless you are looking for a how-to on gynecology you will find the anticipation is better than the fulfillment.

Visit Gyno X - View Replies - Add Reply

House Of Taboo Review

Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:20:25 PST

House Of Taboo (3)

11-21-07 07:20pm

REVIEW = 86 by pat362 (20)

Pros:
*Navigation is quite easy. *Download options for both pictures and videos are amazing. *the selection of women is good and varied. *There is a good choice of taboos offered. *They offer exclusive material. *the download speed is excellent. *The price is reasonable. Updates are pretty regular.

Cons:
Although navigation is made easy, you are required to hit the back button once you've made a selection or you have to retrace your path to the scene you were looking at. The models are all well known eastern european with just a few americans added. I wouldn't mind seeing a trial membership. Except for the download options it's impossible to identify the new scenes

Bottom Line:
I've sampled many of the sites that are part of the DDF family and like them this is a really good site. I'd love it if one day they offered the option of buying at an increase price a membership to a couple or all of their sites. They cover most fetishes with emphasis on spanking and watersports.

Visit House Of Taboo - View Replies - Add Reply

Smother.de Review

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:03:02 PST

Smother.de (0)

11-20-07 04:03pm

REVIEW = 50 by djxtc (0)

Pros:
None

Cons:
Very poor website for fetish lovers of facesitting. Girls are NOT nude and are fully dressed in most cases. Poor quality movies and pictures. Don't wasted you money!!! I had no way to complain to them or ask for a refund

Bottom Line:
Don't waste your time and money. No skin to skin contact. Clothed women sitting on mens faces! Decptive

Visit Smother.de - View Replies - Add Reply

Horny In Hospital Review

Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:00:53 PST

Horny In Hospital (1)

11-19-07 05:00am

REVIEW = 79 by ace of aces (92)

Pros:
+ very fast dl speed over 650 kb/s
+ good - medium video quality
+ do drm
+ no dl limit
+ exclusive content
+ 22 extra sites with dl possibilities
+ flash and wmv straming viewing possibility
+ dl in one part or splitted in up to 16 parts
+ much nylon content

Cons:
- regular price is much to high
- trial is only limited
- to few videos at this page (20)
- only wmv dl
- no possibility to see all the sides updates at one/have to change to sites to dl the updates
- older files of other sites are not possible to dl in one part
- not regular updates (last 13.08.2007)

Bottom Line:
this site belongs to a network. the networks give you access to 22 extra sites. the network gives you the possibility to download hundreds of videos.
the network is good but this special site is only average.

the eastern europe content is nice to see but the video quality is too mixed.

some of the stuff is in bad video quality, but most of it not and nealry everything is downloadable.

the variety of different sex styles is good and mostly contained with teen style 18+.

the dl speed possibility is really quick and there is also no problem to use a dl accelerator.

this specific site has only 20 videos but the quality of them is only average- low.

therefore and because of the access to 22 more sites makes me rate this side to a 79.
make more updates on the single site then this site gets a 80+.

Visit Horny In Hospital - View Replies - Add Reply

CFNM.net Review

Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:19:57 PDT

CFNM.net (0)

10-17-07 08:19am

REVIEW = 84 by troy (2)

Pros:
Great story ideas that correspond with some of my favorite CFNM fantasies. Text that accompanies pics often adds to the excitement - it's either the guys and girls thoughts or a dialog. Sometimes it's cheesy but not too often. The guys and girls are almost all young (18-29) and attractive but still with an amateur feel to many of them.

Cons:
I agree with the official reviewers re: expensive and have to pay extra for videos and that the site navigation is very confusing. They would do much better if a professional adult web designer revamped the site.

Bottom Line:
One of the best CFNM sites with younger models, exciting stories, a variety of themes, and engaging story lines. Overpriced considering videos are extra and site navigation is mediocre at best.

Visit CFNM.net - View Replies - Add Reply

Extreme CFNM Review

Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:34:15 PDT

Extreme CFNM (1)

10-10-07 12:34pm

REVIEW = 65 by Getreal (7)

Pros:
This site is more like a CFNM reality site with lots of pics and videos and exclusive content.

Cons:
Though it has a lot of exclusive content it is low quality and tends to be difficult to navigate. The pictures are fuzzy screen caps and the videos are small Quicktime.

Bottom Line:
This site needs a lot of work.
I would not recommend this site there are better CFNM site out there for the same money.

Visit Extreme CFNM - View Replies - Add Reply

Orgy Max Review

Mon, 24 Sep 2007 02:23:22 PDT

Orgy Max (3)

09-24-07 02:23am

REVIEW = 85 by exotics4me (295)

Pros:
- A full network review, has 12 sites, every fetish you can imagine is here!
- Videos on the sites are 640 on high end and for the most part are very good and there are lots of videos up
- Pictures are available on each of the sites, some run a little below 1200, others towards 1500, but all do come in zips and most sets are huge!
- Most of the sites have some really beautiful women on them
- Definitely an original network, it is unlike any network you can join

Cons:
- Price for the entire network is around $55 for a month.
- We complain about the overuse of female models, well, these sites have about 12 guys that cover all of them from what I can see
- As with any fetish site, the content will always be repetitive after a while.
- The language is not one of 4 that I speak or understand, kind of hurts the content since I didn't get some of the fetishes, with no talking, I am lost

Bottom Line:
The score for the whole network is definitely a sum of it. Overall, the network delivers tons of fetish content. The only thing I didn't find was the really obscure fetishes like Roman Showers, which would have pissed me off if I had paid for to see!

The other sites beside the 3 top ones I reviewed separately are your typical fetishes, peeing, cumshots, 3 separate orgy sites and then the ones I ended up liking the most, the clothed sex sites. This was a whole new fetish to me. Men and women, having sex, fully clothed. I found it interesting and even erotic. What you end up with is a site that reminds you of those high school sneak overs to your girlfriend's house. She slides her shorts over, you unzip your pants and you get the picture. It also makes for a messy situation since half the time the guy cums on the woman's clothes.

Which I hear is also a fetish. This site makes me look at many things differently, I now think everyone has a closet full of fetishes!

Overall, as a network, it delivers what it promises. You get some hardcore sex with the orgy sites, you get fetish, it really is a quality network. The price is still a problem for me. I can join 2-3 sites for the price of this network. Several of these separate sites could be combined, like the orgy sites and the two cumshot sites.

I'm going to recommend the entire network only, and only if you don't mind paying the high price. It has a great preview with trailers as well. For me, one month was enough.

Visit Orgy Max - View Replies - Add Reply

Fetish Planet Review

Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:49:26 PDT

Fetish Planet (1)

09-20-07 10:49am

REVIEW = 69 by apoctom (142)

Pros:
- Lots of very attractive models, including Tawny Roberts and April Flowers
- Huge archive of videos and photo sets
- Full access trial
- Daily photo updates
- Access to 20 sites in the network

Cons:
- Streaming videos only, no download option
- Most streaming clips are less than 5 minutes long
- Many broken links, such as to bonus features
- Photos do not have zip file option
- Non-exclusive content

Bottom Line:
I joined this site because I was intrigued with the content. After reading the TBP review, I thought that joining the trial would be a good way to see if I liked the content. Fortunately, I am only out $3 instead of $35.

This site has a few issues, many pointed out by the TBP team. First, it features old content and it is only available in a streaming format. A download option was available at some time (every scene has a section for download links, but the links have been removed). Also, the clips are only a couple of minutes each, giving the site a 1990s feel.

The site could have been redeemed by having a zip file option for its photo sets, but alas, no such luck. The photos were definitely not "high-res" but did feature lots of familiar pornstars.

All in all, I was really disappointed in this site and network. I'm just glad that I used the trial first. Try this site at your own risk. I don't recommend it.

Visit Fetish Planet - View Replies - Add Reply

Perfect Flex Review

Mon, 20 Aug 2007 00:30:35 PDT

Perfect Flex (2)

08-20-07 12:30am

REVIEW = 74 by exotics4me (295)

Pros:
- Some incredibly flexible models
- Vid quality is decent but could be better, at most 500 on high end. Does have decent 1000+ bitrate
- The old fetish has kind of been satisfied, what was it that I saw up those cheerleaders skirts, if that was ever a fetish for you, this does a good job on it.
- Women are very free with their bodies, fists, dildos, all while wrapping their legs around their neck.
- Has something of an erotic artsy feel in a good way.

Cons:
- Let me get this out first, this site is not only featuring incredibly flexible women, it is also incredibly boring.
- Overpriced for amount of content, should be $14.95, instead it is $34.95.
- Videos are grainy in full screen
- Pics are useless, they take up about 1/4th of my monitor screen, below 1000 on the high end.
- Very repetitive sets

Bottom Line:
These women are real gymnast/ballet dancers/contortionists. The erotic side of this site is very high. You almost feel like you are watching these women stretch, get themselves turned on, then masturbating for you to watch. The only problem and is something I should have listed in the cons is that a good portion of these models do wear masks or half masks, which takes the fantasy of watching an unknowing woman away.

I used to get samples on TGP sites from Perfect Flex, and often thought, "I bet the site shows much more" I was wrong. They do masturbate and even fist, but I'm telling you if you are like me you are going to start feeling like, "Well, they are just doing that for the money". While I agree most models are, at least make me think that isn't true.

I believe most of the models are probably from Russia, very pretty women, if you like toned and fit women. The navigation is about as good as I would expect since I don't believe any of these models are actual porn stars. If you've ever seen the model, Veronika Simon's body, that is the bodies these models have. It still comes off as boring. I really don't have any major complaints except with the price. Videos could be better, pics definitely need to be better, but I could deal with both if they lowered the price and got the models more into what they are doing. Recommended only for those people who have a fetish of a nude woman stretching. Just keep in mind, they all do the same poses, it is just a dull site.

Visit Perfect Flex - View Replies - Add Reply

Fetish Discounts Review

Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:33:28 PDT

Fetish Discounts (1)

08-16-07 12:33pm

REVIEW = 85 by Getreal (7)

Pros:
A lot of content
great variety of content
excellent pantyhose sites
excellent lesbian content
great quality pictures

Cons:
videos are in avi format and slow to load.
a lot of the sites do not update very often
some sites have not been updated this year.
some sites are video only no pictures.

Bottom Line:
If you like lesbians in pantyhose then sign up for pantyhose1 and go from there. Each month you will automatcially gain access to more sites with out paying a lump sum up front.

Visit Fetish Discounts - View Replies - Add Reply

CFNM Idol Review

Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:27:04 PDT

CFNM Idol (1)

07-31-07 12:27pm

REVIEW = 95 by shooterbo (5)

Pros:
.Darn near perfect!
.The best bargain on the planet!
.So many perks come with it, you will have trouble counting them.
.Hundreds of bonus scenes and sites
.80% of content D/L.
.Covers every possible niche.
.Updates every day.
.D/L speeds 512k and 1000k. .wmv
.Navigates magnificently.

Cons:
None come to mind.

Bottom Line:
Probably the best CFNM site on the web, bar none.
This is the way all the CFNM sites should put it together. One recent episode is without a doubt the best 3way bj in the history of porn. If anybody is dissatisfied with this website, then nothing, but nothing, will satisfy them.

Visit CFNM Idol - View Replies - Add Reply

Every Site Access Review

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:52:48 PDT

Every Site Access (1)

07-09-07 04:52pm

REVIEW = 67 by nygiants03 (150)

Pros:
- you get access to many sites

- overall theres plenty of content

- lots of British amateurs

- hardcore content

- nice blow job scenes

Cons:
- no zip download for pics
- pics and videos lack quality
- no site is particularly good
- 24.95 is expensive for a low quality avs
- mostly of the videos are only downloadable in clips ( 15-25 of them)
-site design is bad
-clips only downloable in mpg, and full scene wmv
- you have to enter username and password every site.
-pic sets contain very small gallery

Bottom Line:
-Access to simply demi, tranny party girls, british chubby, british doggers, hot and creamy, send your secretary, cum on my glasses, dirty videos online, dirty uk wives, and looners. Also amateur galleries n videos with loads and loads of content (site has no particular name).

Ill give you a little synopsis of a few sites
Hot n creamy - Only 18 full scene movies in wmv (They range from 30mb - 60mb), 45 videos that are only downloadable in clips , 83 pic sets , stream videos through quicktime, the whole site is facial blowjobs.

-Simply Demi is an older big busted British lady with 56 pic sets and 28 semi hardcore videos.

-dirty videos online has 20 long videos, but are only offered in clips. Some good threesome videos

-cum on my glasses has 36 pics, 36 vids, but only 7 full scene ones. Basically a girl wheres glasses she gives him a bj and hj and he cums on the glasses. The full scene videos actually look decent here, and are about 17 minuted long.

-Overall very disappointed with this avs. They need lots of work.

Visit Every Site Access - View Replies - Add Reply

CFNM Zone Review

Thu, 05 Jul 2007 11:46:39 PDT

CFNM Zone (2)

07-05-07 11:46am

REVIEW = 71 by djwolf (57)

Pros:
- High quality pictures
- Exclusive content
- Good storylines
- Hot amateur women
- Varied scenes
- Updated regularly

Cons:
- Not a great deal of content
- Basic site design
- Video clips are short
- No 'sex' scenes

Bottom Line:
This site features numerous clothed women with naked males, as the title suggests. The content is not particularly 'hard', although it does have some nice scenes. The content mostly features humiliation in various ways, handjobs and footjobs.
There is an average amount of content overall, there are around 50 sets of pictures with at least 100 in each set. They are all shot in high resolution and look good at full screen. The movie section features 40 odd movies which are split up into many small clips which is annoying when you have broadband. The video quality is fairly good but the clips only last about 1-2 mins which is a disappointment.
There is a nice large selection of women on the site, most are hot with tight bodies and sexy clothes. Some are more average looking. It seems that all the women here are amateurs which makes it more realistic.
The site itself is very basic in design and it still needs to grow more. Worth joining once if you're into light femdom and humiliation of men.

Visit CFNM Zone - View Replies - Add Reply

Galactic Girls Review

Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:48:30 PDT

Galactic Girls (1)

07-02-07 10:48am

REVIEW = 83 by apoctom (142)

Pros:
- Very unique content: alien girls and human girls with alien "males"
- Lots of pictures and movies available for download
- Movies are wmv and mpeg; clips are around 100MB (for wmv)
- Full access trial: You can check out the entire site & network
- Access to Adult Fantasy Park network (10 sites total)

Cons:
- Navigation is awkward and not user friendly: pics and vids are buried in multiple layers of menus.
- No updates in a while. Only updates for other network sites.
- Full price is a little high. Use the trial.
- Daily download limit of 3GB. Not compatible with download managers. The server will stop honoring the download manager's file requests.

Bottom Line:
For $3, this network is worth a try. However, for the full cost, I would probably avoid as the niche is not quite for me.

Visit Galactic Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

Gloryhole Girlz Review

Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:21:09 PDT

Gloryhole Girlz (0)

06-26-07 02:21pm

REVIEW = 85 by Jethro (4)

Pros:
Large number of clips.
Good download speed.
Some very cute girls.
Natural set-up in real video store.
Good cumshots.
Some nice POV scenes with cameraman.
No annoying moans and squeals.

Cons:
No major flaws. Only drawbacks are sameness of content and presentation so a bit of fatigue factor sets in, and the quality of video could be a bit higher (but maybe that would take away from the gritty, "real" feel?)

Bottom Line:
Most realistic glory hole action I have seen. Cute girls with high "girl next door" factor. Most of them seem into the action, without suffering from the over the top "Porn Star" moaning that some sites have. I would recommend membership for a month at least. It includes a range of other sites, many of which I did not find appealing but some do add a bit of value.

Visit Gloryhole Girlz - View Replies - Add Reply

Perfect Flex Review

Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:11:44 PDT

Perfect Flex (2)

06-22-07 04:11pm

REVIEW = 85 by Gonzo84 (5)

Pros:
Do you like bendy flexy girls? Anal gaping? Fisting? Serious stretching and hole abuse?

Cons:
I could be cold and list quite a few too many...

Bottom Line:
You definitely need to have a leaning toward this to begin with, this site is pretty expensive for what you actually get, I personally am a fan of contortionism, add stockings, fists, and damn stunning women and I'll be warm to it forever though... ;-)
This site is actually pretty poor, the image quality is not so good, well, images are small (800x533 all the way through) and most sets have this horrible border photo-shopped in, which bugs me, the navigation leaves little to the imagination, although the updates go all the way back to the beginning there is also no .zip facility and the site looks and feels extrememly dated, but a site like this is all about content, and catering for those who dig it...
The subject matter doesn't appeal to all, but it's definitely worth a look at the preview pages just to see if it floats your boat...

Visit Perfect Flex - View Replies - Add Reply

Fets.com Review

Fri, 18 May 2007 18:55:57 PDT

Fets.com (2)

05-18-07 06:55pm

REVIEW = 68 by turismo (55)

Pros:
Hundreds of photo sets
Decent quality pics
Loads of uniform content
Decent trial price
Exclusive content
Some really attractive models
Categorised by model or outfit

Cons:
Hardly any movies
Not enough updates
Far too much emphasis on pantyhose
Very very softcore
Pictures more artistic than erotic
Lack of enthusiasm by some models

Bottom Line:
This site should have made me really happy, a site tailored for a clothing/uniform fetish. Its biggest failing however, is that the models do not come over as alluring or suggestive in any way.
Its all very well done but it seems that the site does not wish to excite, but instead show you the arty photography thay are capable of.
I spent one evening on the site browsing the pictures but found very little worth adding to my libarary because these pictures are not exciting,erotic or suggestive.
They need some more variety on the site too, forget the pantyhose (or tights to us UK browsers) and add stockings, or sexy panties.
Another site which doesn't get the uniform/clothing fetish right - so for softcore action I would have to recommend onlytease, or hardcore fans go to erromax instead.
I certainly didn't get my $10 worth, and this sort of stuff is my fetish so for mainstream users this site will fall well short of what they would expect.

Visit Fets.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Caged Tushy Review

Fri, 04 May 2007 13:31:07 PDT

Caged Tushy (1)

05-04-07 01:31pm

REVIEW = 85 by dumpington (5)

Pros:
Women-in-prison theme, with a dose of sub/dom interaction between the women, sometimes very erotic! For the most part, beautiful actresses.

Cons:
Lack of imagination regarding storylines. Too many of the guard-prisoner encounters involved a guard who wasn't even a lesbian. And occasionally the scenes in the cell between the inmates just seemed like your everyday consensual encounter with no proper "feel" for girls-behind-bars sex. And every now and then they include guys in the scenes, which I found totally unnecessary and out of place.

Bottom Line:
With a little more effort at providing erotic storyline set-ups, this site could be extremely hot!

Visit Caged Tushy - View Replies - Add Reply

Pure CFNM Review

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:22:04 PDT

Pure CFNM (2)

04-25-07 06:22am

REVIEW = 84 by shooterbo (5)

Pros:
.Great storylines
.Good looking participants
.Good price
.Navigates easy
.100% downloads
.New episode every Friday

Cons:
.Too much levity, but improving
.Activity too distant and panoramic
.Heavy accents make for bad communication

Bottom Line:
CFNM lovers will like scenes and direction of each episode. Activity is sometimes spontaneous and too much fun for participants. All in all, it is pretty much typical CFNM venue.

Visit Pure CFNM - View Replies - Add Reply

CFNM Zone Review

Wed, 25 Apr 2007 03:00:10 PDT

CFNM Zone (2)

04-25-07 03:00am

REVIEW = 80 by shooterbo (5)

Pros:
For CFNM lovers, subjects and storylines are very erotic.
Excellent number of features, and a new clip is added almost every day picking up where one of several features remains incomplete until the closing clip is posted.
Close to 50 situations have been completed.

Cons:
Site difficult to figure out initially. "Where are the videos" you first wonder, until you discover a link to them at bottom of first page.
Too many clips to watch to complete one story. Some up to 25 or 30 per story, and each clip averages no more than a minute and several seconds long. You must painstakenly retreive which clip you need from a long, long text list.

Bottom Line:
Storylines are excellent.
Site not user friendly.

Visit CFNM Zone - View Replies - Add Reply

Orgy Max Review

Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:53:34 PDT

Orgy Max (3)

04-23-07 06:53pm

REVIEW = 94 by Yellow (8)

Pros:
- Really great looking woman
- Good quality (DIVx and WMV).. but could better.
- Good quality picture (not screencap), alvailable for dowload into zip archives.
- All exclusive full-lenght videos, 5-6 update/week
- Cover many fetish niche, but mainly around chic clothed fetish.
- 10 current sites + 3 archive sites. From 80 to 700 updates by site. Most around 150-200.- Hardcore action without violence.
- Basically group action (3-4-5 or more).
- Support downloader, fast servers
- No DRM

Cons:
- Cost more than other sites, like many european sites.
- Foreign langage (Polish ... tcheck?) .. if you don't mind earing yâââ!-yâââ! all the time :-)
- Sometime repetitive scenario within site theme
- Earing photographer camera shutter during video.
- Party could be more focus on the action
- Some video in archive sites badly encode

Bottom Line:
Very nice classy girl in nylon and silk, (few lesbian dedicated scenes, guys are never far away). Sites are by theme, exemple ... guys pissing on girls, coming on them, golden shower, etc, real party.

That one of the best site I have been a member of. Certainly on in my top3.

We can recognize the same guy and models across the site, and like many sites on the Internet, the scenario doesn't change to much within a site theme.

WEB design isn't fancy. There is a blog for those who like that stuff. News page log all new addition to the network. Don't have to dig to retreive video. One login for all the network.

If you like classic girl doing dirty hardcore actions, you would probably appreciate this site a lot. If you don't mind, not understanding a word.

Visit Orgy Max - View Replies - Add Reply

Gyno X Review

Mon, 16 Apr 2007 05:21:00 PDT

Gyno X (1)

04-16-07 05:21am

REVIEW = 97 by DutchDoctor (8)

Pros:
1. Very realistic, which is important for gyno-lovers;
2. Real deep insertions of fingers, instruments and hands;
3. They are using enemas (bulbs and bags) as well;
4. Mostly male-doctors, which I find more erotic than girls with a red-cross cap playing doctor;
5. Patients are quite young (20/25) and goodlooking;
6. Easy downloading;
7. Long movies (ca. 45 min.);
8. Good quality of the movies;
9. Excellent photos in enormous series of 600/800 per movie.
10. Even pregnant patients!

Cons:
1. Language is not english, but somewhere from Eastern Europe, although understanding is not essential;
2. Needs some growth.

Bottom Line:
This is by far the most realistic gyno-site. All scenes in a real doctorsroom with professional gyno-chairs, doctors-couch, gyno-instruments and real-looking male doctors. The doctors are even quite handsome, no stupid ponytails or tatoos, although mostly quite young.

Besite the doctors there are nice-looking nurses who are helping them spreading the butt-cracks of the mostly handsome female patients.

About 3 complete movies per month.

Visit Gyno X - View Replies - Add Reply

Orgy Max Review

Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:56:37 PDT

Orgy Max (3)

03-15-07 02:56am

REVIEW = 85 by turismo (55)

Pros:
Loads of fetish content
Good quality movies
No DRM
Bonus sites are good
Frequent updates
Can download whole scenes

Cons:
Fairly expensive
Not for the faint hearted
Download speeds on movies vary
No more Al Caporno updates

Bottom Line:
Although this site is not for the faint hearted, and may seem a little expensive, this is a site worth joining, if only for 30 days.
There is a clothing fetish site, watersports, orgies, among others, and my favourite, Al Caporno. Think Max Hardcore without being as repulsive.
The models seem enthusiastic, although it would be nice to some more "teen" additions, the only real downside is the lack of updates for the Al Caporno section, although there are at least 5 hours of movies on this site still available for download
Bottom line: price v content is good, and worth visiting for a 30 day subscription

Visit Orgy Max - View Replies - Add Reply