PU - New Reviews

abbywinters Review

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:01:27 PST

abbywinters (3)

02-12-12 12:01pm

REVIEW = 97 by xexbot (6)

Pros:
It's hard to discuss Abby Winters in terms of porn sites because this is simply not the usual porn site. There is a reason it has remained one of the top rated sites of all time for the last decade. It ranges from the dainty petting softcore stuff you expect from a couple of bi-curious girls to penetration bordering on XXX. You are never going to see anything too hard or edgy here, and that's what most people like about this site. It is a sort of sweet, touching, beautiful, natural type of porn that's hard to even want to call it "porn."

The video quality here is good and as you get into the more recent stuff a lot of it is HD. I like their system for selection video quality. You just click one of four boxes next to a video, and the next time that's where it will default to, or the closest lower setting in the case of older videos. They tend to clip them, but there are usually no more than three. Navigation is also very well cross listed with keywords, so searching is a breeze.

Cons:
So, here's the only downside to Abby Winters, and it is a personal issue that you may not be as bothered by, but the whole premise of the natural girl having real, natural sex is great, and it is beautiful and tender. But, it also leaves no room for originality or individuality. Simply put, it all kind of starts to look the same after awhile. You'll find your favs, like Chloe B, and you will download everything she has and love it, and you'll do the same for the next ten girls. But after a few months I found myself just checking in occasionally, and when I did I downloaded one or two things here and there and before long I was maybe getting a couple of videos a week from them. Couldn't really justify the price. It's hard to stay a member at sites like this for long.

Bottom Line:
Look, if you have never had a membership to Abby Winters it is certainly worth a month. They offer a pretty good deal for three months, and I think it's worth a few months of being able to download stuff from them. If you're like me you will probably tire of them, or you will basically have gotten all you really need from their site to keep you happy in the future. Either way, this site deserves support. They are a unique and enlightened businesswomen, and they are offering a quality product. It's just they are dedicated to pretty much one or two things, lesbian sex and masturbation, so it's hard for them to really offer a wide range of porn. This is true of many sites. One speaks volumes is the fact that Abby Winters has been around for so long and has been recognized by so many as one of the industry's best. In many ways they have sort of become the PLAYBOY of the internet.

Visit abbywinters - View Replies - Add Reply

Nubiles Review

Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:19:06 PST

Nubiles (7)

02-12-12 10:19am

REVIEW = 91 by selphy (15)

Pros:
- GbTons of young pussy (50% EU and 50% USA, pro, semipro and newbie), often shooted at the beginning of their careers
- Very good designed site. Simple and efficient in surfing, you can choose the model (good info: there are also links to other site where the same model appear)
- Many downloadable format: wmv HD (never heavy to dwn), mpg, mp4, mobile.
- Also pictures have zip file in medium and large format
- Good dwn speed and dwn manager works fine too
- Well shot scene: solo or HC too.

Cons:
- A little bit "plan": there is not various (i.e. few anal or lez scenes)
- Sometimes videos are lack in quality (some rumors or blurred), or sometimes the HC scenes are not well cutted at the end (this is very important): I prefer the scene where you can see the actors in their "10 seconds after the c.shot"
- Only 1 HC scene a week.
- Poor bonus sites (also if there are some discount to other sites)

Bottom Line:
Warning: GigaTons of Pussy inside !!
I'm warning you....
It is a very good designed site, with a lot of different way of viewing your preferite model. And, when you are inside a model description, you can choose your pref video, pictures (large or medium res), resolution, streaming or dwn, format (wmv, avi, mpg, mp4, mobile, flash), clips or entire. The most videos (2012 to 2007) are in wmv HD; only sometimes the videos are a little bit lack in quality or are not completely in focus. I've never seen before such a well done site.
The dwn speed is good and also dwn manager works well.
The girls are fantastic (50% USA and 50% EU), young (you can see some recent pornstars at the beginning of their career or semi pro model) and you can see solo scene (most of the video are solos) or hardcore scenes too (about 20% is hardcore and the rest is solos).
There are few, few, few anal scenes In HC shots and I'm regretted for this....with such a beautiful girls....; but this is (in my opinion) a precise choice of the Company Site.
There are every day updates and this is fine compared to other site; every week the Company focuses on one or two models and shows theirs scenes. There is one HC scene a week and the rest are solo scenes.
What's not nice ? Well...
In my opinion, to be "the perfect site" , It would be a little bit more various in HC scenes: more "anal" (just 20%), and or more "lesbian"

Visit Nubiles - View Replies - Add Reply

Josh Girls Review

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:03:30 PST

Josh Girls (1)

02-10-12 10:03am

REVIEW = 83 by foxtails (1)

Pros:
- lots of beautiful energetic fun women who are having fun
- lots of creative exorcises that the women perform
- simple site and simple navigation
- original
- Josh is a cool webmaster who responds to emails

Cons:
- could use more consistency in introducing the women (more stretching and up-close shots please)
- just a tad bit pricey as I would like to see more girls

Bottom Line:
Joshgirls is a recent favorite of mine as it's very original in what it offers. While there have been many athletic sites out there that show girls performing more complex exorcises in the buff none have zeroed in on the hot and fun simplicity that Joshgirls offers.

So first of all, what exactly are Joshgirls? They're simply women who have big breasts that can really really bounce. Which is also one of the two key elements that separates Joshgirls from other slightly similiar athletic sites. Every single one of girls on the site has large breasts.

And the second fun element is that Joshgirl's simply intends to show them bouncing in literally almost every imaginable way possible. Whether it be on a trampoline, oiled up, or while the women is using a hippity hop. And it's all hot. There's no exercise performed that will not show these beautiful breasts bouncing as god intended.

There are only two complaints I have. First is while the site has a decent amount of videos now as of feb 10,2012, 205 +, the amount of girls is still relatively low in comparison to other athletic sites. But it's not that big of an issue because of the quality content that is there.

My second complaint is the consistency in how Josh introduces the girls which is a bit of a letdown. A few girls before getting started get some amazing intimate up-close views of everything they got while most don't. A standard stretching and up-close intro would be nice from now on.

Also I just want to let people know that this is strictly a video site. There are no pictures to speak of. It's a non-issue for me and really should be for most as pictures cannot capture breasts bouncing that well. ;)

Overall, this is a fun and hot site that carves out its own niche in this repetitive copy and paste world of porn. And its only negative for me is that there's not enough of this and that in a few areas. I give it a 83. I highly recommend it for anyone looking for something that's just fun and hot and almost even seemingly innocent - almost.

Visit Josh Girls - View Replies - Add Reply

VideoBox Review

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 02:40:01 PST

VideoBox (11)

02-10-12 02:40am

REVIEW = 89 by nickisthename (3)

Pros:
A massive amount of hardcore scenes featuring actresses (and directors/studios) from the well known to the unknown. As of this writing there are almost 70,000 scenes available for download. New videos are added regularly.

Downloading is very easy, and you can select different file sizes/types for your convenience.

The videos are almost always of a higher quality than those found at the various tube sites.

Finding videos of a certain niche (amateur, anal, etc) is fairly easy, although it could be improved (see "Cons" section).

Very low cost considering the large amount of usually high quality content.

Cons:
The content is non-exclusive.

The filter function could really use some work, it's the main reason I've scored this website in the high 80s rather than the 90s. It lets you include certain content in the filter, but doesn't let you exclude content. For example, let's say I want a video featuring a blonde woman but I'm not in the mood for anal. I can specify "Blonde" in a filter search but I can't specify "not anal". Considering that there are currently over 10,000 "Blonde anal" scenes that I'd have to manually avoid, that's a problem.

The porn itself is of varying quality. Some is quite good, some isn't. There are too many un-apologetically over the top performances for my liking, but that's porn for you. I'd wager that it won't bother most of the website's target customer base.

Bottom Line:
Although the content isn't exclusive, I've not seen it in a single place at such a high quality for such a low price. Videobox.com is overall an excellent website for someone who wants access to high quality, professionally produced adult video downloads at a relatively low price point.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

The GF Network Review

Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:55:15 PST

The GF Network (0)

02-10-12 01:55am

REVIEW = 59 by nickisthename (3)

Pros:
Has a gigantic selection of videos and photos featuring ostensibly amateur participants. Most of the women appear to be college aged "girl next door" types, but there are a few older women and a fair number of young women with less typical styles/body types.

The GF Network also includes access to a guys only site, if that's your thing.

Cons:
Much of this amateur content has simply been grabbed from other sources, slapped with a watermark, and uploaded onto the GF Network's servers.

The quality of the photos vastly outweighs the quality of the videos. If you're looking for video quality above that found at the average tube site, look elsewhere.

The search feature doesn't allow the user to define length of video, which means manually wading through tons of videos shorter (often much shorter) than 5 minutes to find a longer one.

Bottom Line:
Considering the low quality of the videos, and the non-exclusivity of the content overall, the product doesn't justify the cost of admission. I don't recommend this website.

Visit The GF Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Ferro Network Review

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:19:47 PST

Ferro Network (3)

02-09-12 08:19pm

REVIEW = 94 by xexbot (6)

Pros:
So many videos, so many sites. Yes some of them get cross listed, but for the most part they are providing a lot of specific niche material. I actually think they have a pretty smart business model, charge big up front, because lets face it people are going to rip the sites in a month or so, then lessen the fees as time goes by. It's a pretty smart thing to do. Anyone balking at the price might consider this.

Basically you get a shit ton of nylon sites, which are actually really good sites even if you aren't into the fetish. They have a lot of femdom strapon stuff, some mature stuff, bisexual, and more. The newer vids are pretty good in terms of quality. There's still very little HD at this site because they just started adding some HD stuff. I know that is a peeve for some people. However, the fetish stuff their offering is pretty unique, and sometimes it has to be more about the content than the quality. Most of the models are pretty hot too.

Cons:
There is no BDSM or Cuckold stuff here for some reason. The BDSM I get, but seems like cuckold sites would be right up their alley, or his....;)

Older vids are pretty damn old. Low quality for the low bandwidth days. They get progressively better though.

Very little search and navigation capability.

Like the others have said, you have to manually log in to each site. The problem is you have to do it with a very cryptic username and password they assign to you. That's why everyone is complaining. They're too hard to remember. Type it into a doc and just cut and paste with your browser set to remember the passwords.

Bottom Line:
Yes, it's expensive. Yes, it's worth it. Let's be clear. This is a softer domination site, so if you're looking for extreme hardcore BDSM and femdom, not a good choice for you. If you are looking for nylon fetish, feminization, humiliation, men getting ass fucked by men and women, women getting as fucked by men and women,tranny sex, mature sex, masturbation, gay and bisexual sex, then this is a damn good choice.

Visit Ferro Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Anal Teen Angels Review

Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:03:17 PST

Anal Teen Angels (2)

02-09-12 12:03pm

REVIEW = 90 by TheSquirrel (30)

Pros:
Plenty of young attractive girls, professionally filmed and photographed. The videos are well shot, and well lit, which mostly makes the girls look sensational.

The look on the girls' faces. Hard to explain, but for me it's the perfect balance of innocence, professionalism, and eroticism. For an attempted explanantion see "Bottom Line."

No DRM or DL limits.

The negatives aren't as negative.

Access to 21 Sextury network.

$10 discount using link from TBP/PU.

Exclusive content with a variety of download, streaming and photo options.

Cons:
Considering softcore is catered for on this network, it's a big disappointment that the photos here don't have enough strip to nude, where you get the chance to appreciate the girl on her own, before the hardcore starts. Occasionally fewer photos than expected.

Clinically professional at times.

Some girls are already old timers, have appeared many times on other sites, and appear many times across the network.

All shaven.

At times I found download speeds sluggish, with navigation clumsy, awkward and slow to respond.

The look is homogeneous due to mass production.

Too many tats, and fake breasts, and too many thin girls who look the same.

The home page is rather annoying and awkward. You do have options, but finding out how to navigate is a little difficult. When you put your mouse over the picture of the model to find out who she is and what the scene is, a series of flashing pictures kicks in, semi obscuring the information you are looking for. Irritating.

Bottom Line:
This for me is the flagship of 21 Sextury. Membership gives access to the entire network, which I could have reviewed, but I spent more time here than any other site. Technically I can't find fault. Here are some of the specs.

Pic resolution and what defines normal or high resolution does vary, but comes as high as 5616x3744, with normal resolution 1280x853. There is also 3888x2592, 4992x3328, and 3000x2000. Screenshots are generally 1280x720.

Downloads come in low, medium, and ultra high H264, and medium, high, and ultra high wmv(960x540 1611kbps, 960x540 3122 kbps). Top new download resolution is 1920x1080 with 8158 kbps, although there are quite a few still at 1280x720 with 3122 kbps. Apologies for being too spec heavy. It does vary, but the quality is usually excellent.

Streaming is at low, medium, and high quality H264.

The models generally look well made up and glossy, bordering on the old glamour mag style, but often have a girl next door rather than porn model look. It's what the girl next door would look like given a paint gloss, some polyfiller, and put under studio lights.

There is some ethnic diversity but most are thin, white, and young. For me, there are too many tats and fake breasts, although not as many as the worst American networks.

However the girls are generally young, beautiful, and have a girl next door innocence, even though the overall look is glossy.

For me, there are not enough new models. One small criticism of 21 Sextury as a whole is they shoot the same model too many times.

Some of the photos go straight from topless into fully nude, or nude oral sex. There is little build up or a teasing strip. Sometimes you get five or ten photos that look exactly the same. It's an awful waste of attractive models. Out of 100 photos for instance, there can be 50 that all look very much the same, or 30 clothed, 30 topless, one or two nude, then fully nude oral sex. There is very little in the way of stripping and a gradual build up to the action.

Having said all that, the photos are highly professional, beautifully lit and beautifully set up. For me the greatest plus for the whole site is something I can hardly explain. It's the look on the girls' faces. This may be entirely subjective, and may or may not turn you on. The only way I can describe it is to say the photographer captures a complete look of innocence, and enjoyment, while at the same time mass producing professional material, from a professional model who is having anal sex. The model looks innocent and enjoying it enough for it not to look as though she is being exploited.

I don't care if they get it right purely by chance, and if they hate or have contempt for their customers. As long as customer service is okay, all I care about is they produce great looking porn - and they do. I haven't had to deal with customer service, which is both good and bad. It's good that I haven't had to contact them, but I can't vouch for how good they are.

Obviously there is a concentration on anal here, but there is vaginal, lesbian, and toys on other sites in the network.

I could have done with more shapes, sizes, and ethnic diversity. Mainly the sex here is one on one only. I like to see group sex but there is little here, and little across the 21 Sextury network.

The negatives aren't as negative as most sites. Yes, there is not enough ethnic or size diversity, but there are still a few girls who go against this mould. Yes, there are some scenes where they choke or slap the girls, but they are not very common. Some have tats and fake breasts, but not too many. Yes, there are too many closeups and gynaecological shots, but there is also plenty of material showing the full girl in all her beauty. Admittedly, at times the professionalism is clinical and produces samey material, but it looks great, and in my opinion is better than their competitors.

I have not seen any other site get it this right. Mass produced porn and innocence, without guilt, or exploitation? An absence of sleaze. Fun porn for the masses, without a lot of the things we hate here at PU.

Despite the faults, for me this is the best network, best teen site, and best anal site (the also excellent Asshole Fever is available on the network). I give it 90 as I consider it to be best in class. That equals the highest mark I have given.

Visit Anal Teen Angels - View Replies - Add Reply

Cuckold Cream Review

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:12:06 PST

Cuckold Cream (1)

02-08-12 10:12pm

REVIEW = 70 by xexbot (6)

Pros:
The video's and pics are quality cuckold, though it will be the standard "I need a black dick" scenario every time. The production value is there, the girls are hot, but the action is a little, well, pedantic.

You also get access to their other sites, which are exclusive, but also pretty run of the mill. In terms of niche there might be a few that will interest you, but I found them all pretty boring.

Cons:
Video is in one format only (wmv) but they do give you a choice of different qualities and sizes. Still, the content is just uninspired, and it looks like pretty much the same cuck videos we've seen a hundred times before. Admittedly, the white chick needing a black dick and making her husband watch scenario may work for you, I still don't think they offer enough here to really impress you beyond what you have seen before.

I list this under cons just because I'm sure there are a few of you out there who will want to know, but there is no bi-sexual, forced bisexuality, or anything more extreme than a girl fucking another guy in front of her significant other.

As of Feb. 2012, canceling with their online system does not work! I had to send two emails to get them to cancel before my trial ran out. Be careful of this.

Bottom Line:
It might be worth taking the trial run at them just to see if there is anything beyond this site, such as their tranny site or their teen site, that might interest you. However, with the cancellation issues I had, I wouldn't risk it.

Visit Cuckold Cream - View Replies - Add Reply

Kneel Beg Crawl Review

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:48:59 PST

Kneel Beg Crawl (1)

02-08-12 09:48pm

REVIEW = 50 by xexbot (6)

Pros:
There may be a few videos here you will like, for the most part though it's pretty much homemade crap. Bad quality, low-rent, and obviously being shot in the same handful of apartments every time. The chicks are pretty hot. This looks like a half ass attempt by a few working or up and coming stars to start their own site. Unfortunately they fail miserably.

Cons:
There's no index or navigation worth a flip on this site. Basically you get to choose between a few links that take you to pages that look like something right out of 1998. A bunch of pictures just haphazardly splashed across the page under pics, some really badly typed descriptions of videos, and all sorts of broken links and missing image files. Low rent doesn't even begin to describe this site. The video quality is average on their movies, but the content is pretty questionable in terms of value. The pics are not professional looking. Basically they are counting on the fact that the girls are hot to carry everything. But there are just as good looking women working on a lot better quality sites than this one, so it begs the question as to whether this is really worth your money.

Bottom Line:
Basically you are looking at a very small amount of videos for what they charge, and you will have seen them all within a day. Even if you like them, you'll end up with maybe ten that are worth keeping. For the price they are charging it is really not a good value when you could join any other site and will immediately be stepping up from this very archaic looking site.

Visit Kneel Beg Crawl - View Replies - Add Reply

Fantasy One Review

Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:46:54 PST

Fantasy One (0)

02-08-12 07:46pm

REVIEW = 69 by Ken3123 (0)

Pros:
Great production visuals in every scene; The women are superhot; Girl-girl scenes are worth watching; $10 a month is a fantastic price to check out this site; Some names may be familar to the porn fans (ie. Alexis Texas)

Cons:
The downloads are quick, only because the scenes are under 5 minutes; Couldn't stream any scenes; Lack of boy/girl scenes will disappoint most porn fans; Hard to find any updates; Jazz music, with no dirty talk or orgasms, is very disappointing

Bottom Line:
FantasyOne is an ok website. I am impressed with the visual presentation and the women are
definitely worth watching. However, there are many gripes about the site. From the short length of the scenes, hard to find updates, and worst of all, LACK OF ORGASMS!!! This site just didn't give me a full on boner. The $10 is a solid price to check this site out. Just don't be surprised if you get disappointed as I have about FantasyOne.

Visit Fantasy One - View Replies - Add Reply

See Me Tease Review

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 12:30:51 PST

See Me Tease (0)

02-07-12 12:30pm

REVIEW = 98 by dynamitesl (0)

Pros:
There is sound for most of the cams, so you can listen to the babe rather than just have her type. They also offer a cam-to-cam option if you want the model to be able to see you as well. The models all have bios, some vid caps and a link to any of their recorded shows. The streaming ranges from average to great. In addition, you can choose between three different screen sizes. Even at the largest setting, there was usually no lag or choppiness. There is also an easy-to-use interface that allows you to toggle the contrast and brightness.

Cons:
None

Bottom Line:
I would recommend this site if your looking for good quality models and cams.

Visit See Me Tease - View Replies - Add Reply

Dixie's Trailer Park Review

Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:03:27 PST

Dixie's Trailer Park (0)

02-07-12 10:03am

REVIEW = 65 by Cashed (1)

Pros:
** Unique Theme to the Website.

Cons:
** Website is very basic. Needs a major update.
** Not even basic user features like searching, or rating content. No interaction with other users whatsoever.
** Video quality isn't very good, and most scenes are incomplete. Full videos are nothing more than their video clips edited together.
** Though descent amount of pic sets, very small quantity , and a very average quality.
** Updates for video content is very inconsistent.
** Download speeds were very inconsistent.
** Some Video Links were broke.

Bottom Line:
Overall I find this site to be mediocre. They have some good ideas that are just poorly executed. They need to make their website more interactive, and put more effort into their content, and quality.

Visit Dixie's Trailer Park - View Replies - Add Reply

Strapon Dreamer Review

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:48:53 PST

Strapon Dreamer (1)

02-06-12 08:48pm

REVIEW = 95 by xexbot (6)

Pros:
The level of porn here is clearly in the upper echelons compared to most sites. Simply put, this place is really top notch. The girls are all pretty gorgeous, and the production value is good quality. They are catering to a few kinks here as well as the strapon femdom. There are occasionally cuckold fantasies, lesbian bondage, and generally something that will cater to your edgier whims. This is not a full blown BDSM site, though there's plenty of it, but it focuses more on the domination angle and ass fucking men with strapons than the whips and chains (though a few are about 50/50).

They actually have a unique feature that seems to be very popular in that that let you write your own fantasies on a message board and if they pick it they will model their shoot after it. They also have some social networking dedicated to these types of interests. So, all in all it has actually turned out to be one of those sites I spend quite a bit of time at. Plenty to do.

Cons:
Unfortunately they are a niche site with a very specific niche, so the amount of videos to date is limited. The selection of formats is limited, but that isn't a real huge issue. It's still quality video, most of it being HV or HD. Where they lack in volume they more than make up for in content and quality.

Bottom Line:
Yes, it's a little more expensive, but it is a niche site. I thought I would pay my dues and leave in a month, but I'm still there. Will I keep it for a full year, probably not. Will I give it at least a three or four months, definitely.

Visit Strapon Dreamer - View Replies - Add Reply

We Are Hairy Review

Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:17:41 PST

We Are Hairy (4)

02-06-12 07:17pm

REVIEW = 70 by monty4321 (3)

Pros:
Clean layout of site.

Has a good proportion of higher resolution pics.

Cons:
Hit and miss on the video quality.

No standard in terms of poses. You will not get similar poses from set to set. The thing about that is you will not get the poses that you want.

Focusing issues throughout.

There is rarely any ethnicity on the site.

Not enough models.

Not enough attractive models.

Bottom Line:
Overall I was very disappointed with the site mainly due to the quality of the photos.

In my opinion most of the woman on the site are not too attractive. 50 - 75% of the woman is a 5 out of 10. 5 being average. If you like stunning women from time to time - look else where.

If you like a standard among poses from set to set , you will be very frustrated here. You'll be lucky to get a nice boob shot or butt shot on every set let alone the common poses. The poses are very random, because of this, you will never know what you're going to get on the daily updates - I know that some people likes this however. I was disappointed more times than not.

This is a hairy site, therefore, I thought they would be superb when it comes to seeing a clear detailed shot of the vagina. They were just good enough on the closeups. On most of the shots when zoomed out to more of a full body shot - the quality went down the toilet - and the vagina were of pretty bad detail. This was frustrating because the photos were very large, yet they were lacking in detail.

There were terrible lighting issues throughout. Some of the photo shoots were so bright that the details were burned out and blinding. Some of this may be due to photo editing. On many occasions the photo editing ruined detail, such as not being able to see detail of the woman's hair.

There were too many occasions of the hairy extreme, which included hairy legs, hairy asses, and arm pits.

If you like female masturbation videos - stay away from this site. Theses are among the most boring women masturbating that I have ever seen; the females will not utter a word; they rarely make moaning sounds; you could hear a pen drop they're so quiet; the females rarely looks into the camera nor interact; seams like they pull on or play with their pubic hair more than masturbating; the masturbation seems very fake on most videos;

The worse part of the videos is the extreme closeup shots. They stay zoomed for half to 3/4 of the videos in many cases.

Visit We Are Hairy - View Replies - Add Reply

Lacy Nylons Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:05:18 PST

Lacy Nylons (1)

02-05-12 08:05pm

REVIEW = 79 by messmer (123)

Pros:
Models on the average are easy on the eye. Not porn star quality but not ugly either.

Site updates videos once every eight days. Not great but mentioned under the pros because other Ferro Sites are so much worse when it comes to updating.

Picture sets appear to update every two days.

Videos since 2009 (I counted 114) have been shot in HD at 1280x720p in wmv at a total bitrate of 3320kbps. Videos before that are at 640x480p.

Picture sets can be downloaded zipped, with the individual picture weighing in around 1000x1500px.

Cons:
Separate sign-ins required for pictures and videos, because the username and password are generated by Ferro and therefore very convoluted, it is an impossibly aggravating extra task to have to sign in twice to every site you receive as a bonus that also contains pictures.

The huge watermarks in the bottom right hand corner as well as in the left top corner I've remarked upon in previous previews of other Ferro sites, are present here, too, and manage greatly to add to the aggravation factor. I almost didn't bother adding this site because while the technical quality of the videos isn't too bad, they are not worth looking at with that intrusive logo staring you in the face all through the video.

Picture sets are small and not very erotic.

Download and streaming are highly erratic. My downloads started at around 1MB/s, gradually reduced to 200K/s, and then see-sawed back and forth between those two values.

No proper search engine, no model directory or bio.

Bottom Line:
This is a site I was prepared to love. After all, who, over fifty, does not like to see models dressed in nylons and garter belt?

And you get plenty of that in this site. For once pantyhose was not substituted in someone's mind for stockings and they stick to the old definition when it comes to nylons.

One idiosyncrasy of this site, or maybe two:

Most models start out naked and then get slowly dressed, rather than the other way around, also very few of them wear panties but walk around commando style under their lovely dresses instead.

This anachronism is jarring to an old-timer because nylons and garter belts belong to an era where no woman would have thought to get dressed without panties and slip.

Both picture sets and videos lack imagination, with the models looking stiff and uninvolved. Of course, it doesn't help that the videos are in a foreign language (Russian? Hungarian? Czech?) so you miss out on the context of the video as well.

Let me sum things up in a highly subjective way (in other words don't take every negative thing I have to say as the Gospel truth):

A. I wouldn't bother with the pictures. The quality is too uneven and the sets are too small. Plus the logo, even if it has been reduced to one only, is still too intrusive.

B. I wouldn't bother with the videos because they lack erotic heat as well as the tease factor, and on top of that they are being ruined by watermarks that are meant to protect their copyright but manage instead to aggravate purists like me who like to look at a clean picture with no, or at most, with a discrete logo.

The separate sign-in for the various sites is just plain dumb. Especially if a distinction is being made between pictures and videos requiring authorization by both.

If I judged this site, or any other Ferro site I got during this past month, for myself I wouldn't give any of them more than a 69 because I look and then throw away ... see humongous watermarks.

However because of their relatively good rate of update, plus the basically decent TECHNICAL quality of the videos, plus the fact that one monthly subscription will give you four sites eventually, I will give it a 79. Of the four Ferro sites I reviewed during the past month this site, despite its flaws, is the best.

BTW, the site is softcore with some toy play thrown in. A plus for me (the softcore part), might be a minus for others.

Visit Lacy Nylons - View Replies - Add Reply

My Sexy Legs.net Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 13:55:56 PST

My Sexy Legs.net (0)

02-05-12 01:55pm

REVIEW = 50 by 3bro (0)

Pros:
Good quality pictures for leg and nylon fans with a girl next door appeal.
Seems to be updated regularly.

Cons:
Video content is boring.
No zip-file content.

Bottom Line:
I gave this site 50 which is poor but this is not the site's fault, the content quality deserves a higher rating. The real reason I have submitted this review is that I have been left highly displeased at the problems with access to the website therefore please take the following as a warning. I joined the mysexylegs.net around a week ago. I was happy with the content however for reason's unknown, my access to both the site and it's billing partner MSL Enterprises ceased entirely, and I was left with a screen message that stated "internet explorer cannot display webpage". After emailing MSL with this, I was told that this issue was probably my web browser. I tried a different browser to no avail. After contacting MSL Enterprises I was eventually advised that the firewall had been activated possibly by too many log in attempts. I am in the habit of saving my automatic log ins as I go, so I don't know how this happened. MSL Enterprises swiftly resolved the firewall issue however I was unable to access the actual members area beyond the homepage with either the new or the old passwords. Again I contacted MSL Enterprises and again I was advised that the issue was probably PC / web browser related and there was nothing more they could do. I asked about a partial refund and this was refused with the same advice about changing my web browser or PC. About this MSL Enterprises were adamant as they advised me that they had been able to log in with my user-name / password on three different devices with no trouble. I would advise anyone therefore to avoid mysexylegs.net simply because you might not be given the full month's subscription period you have paid for. You take your chances...Shame as the site itself was quite good.

Visit My Sexy Legs.net - View Replies - Add Reply

We Are Hairy Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 12:42:08 PST

We Are Hairy (4)

02-05-12 12:42pm

REVIEW = 95 by BubbaGump (12)

Pros:
+ A good range of hirsute content to suit most tastes in this niche,.
+ Wholesome, pretty, amateur models.
+ Large Database of Photosets and videos.
+ Clean and efficient site design and layout.
+ Customizable user settings and search features provide a nice user experience
+ Custom zip files for downloads
+ Multiple Daily Video/Photo updates
+ Free Cam Shows
+ Good customer service

Cons:
- Older photo content can have issues with soft-focus and stray focus.
- Lack of any substantial ethnic diversity in models.
- Web cam show scheduling conflicts with most schedules in north America.

Bottom Line:
I found myself really hard-pressed to come up with any specific negatives beyond those listed above. This is one of the best sites--if not the best--I have come across in terms of the user experience and range of content available to a subscriber. There are extensive photo sets, videos, free interactive web shows, all for a single subscription price. The user experience I can only classify as top-notch, at least relative to the sites I have subscribed to in the past. There are utilities for just about any feature at the site. There are customizable search tools, gallery tools, favorite lists, and custom zip downloads where you are free to choose to select(or deselect) which images go into a zip. There is also a user forum and web masters are very quick to respond to any questions.

The content here is traditional solo softcore posing with some dildo and masturbation action. There is the occasional girl-girl scene as well. If your preference is softcore erotica, the content will meet your demands. If you demand hardcore action, this is not the place to find it and you will be disappointed.

If you are looking for the traditional airbrushed porn star look, this site will likewise not meet your needs. Makeup is used in moderation--it is of the kind you will see on any girl on the street-- and there is no attempt tot hide any blemish or mole with post-processing. The models are pretty and wholesome amateurs but they are not over-glamorized. That is not the look that this site aims for and it would detract from the natural theme. Most of the models appear to be in their mid-twenties, with a few MILF and a few of the just-turned-legal variety.

There is an abundance pf photo and video content and updates happen daily. Galleries are nicely done with semi-pro level photography. Super-high resolution images bring out every subtle detail and nuance on the models. Some of the older sets, however, do suffer at times from stray focus or a soft focus. This issue does not appear in most of the photosets posted after 2010, however. The videos are of high quality and they are clips of roughly 10 minutes in length. The main attraction here, however, is the photography. I found the DL speeds to be more than adequate.

Beyond the occasional image quality issue of older sets, the only other negative that stands out is the lack of diversity in the ethnicity of the models. Most are from Eastern Europe, the UK, or California. It would be nice to see the site expand this range a bit and offer more Latin and ethnic models in the galleries.

There are interactive web cam shows that happen a few times a week. These last an hour Unfortunately, the scheduled times appear to be centered around European time zones. Outside of the 4 PM Saturday show, if you are in North America, you will likely find it hard to attend during the week, out of personal work schedules. Never having attended a cam show in the past, I wasn't sure what to expect as I have no experience with cam media. I did sit in on the Saturday show with the model Raven. One can type questions or comments--or requests--and the model seemed willing to oblige(within reason). The feed quality was decent. The flow could be easily interrupted, however, when users ask questions(or act like toolbags)' Once you find the ignore user option, however, it is less distracting. If you are into cam shows, this is certainly a nice bonus, especially given that it is free of charge and from what I can tell, most fees for cam shows can be ridiculously expensive. Being able to interact with the models adds a personal touch to the site experience.

I chose to join this site as I prefer natural femininity over the glossed-over and heavily-toned airbrushed look of the majority of porn available today. What many people interested in this niche probably want to hear most about is the actual hirsute content available. Based on comments I have read here and elsewhere, it seems that what people find attractive in this niche is all over the board, which one would epect, given the broad scope and relative meaning that the word 'hairy' invokes. There is probably not a niche that has more diversity of tastes and opinions. When reading the review comments for various sites in this niche, I see complaints about models being too hairy or not hairy enough, or not having hair in the right place. What is hairy enough? What is too hairy? What is the right place? The answers are so relative to an individual that I cannot tell you if the content here meets your criteria. What I can say is that this site appears to cater to the middle of the road and it avoids extremes as a predominant feature. This is the way it should be, IMO, as there are so many tastes. No preference is given to any fetish and the content strikes a good balance. You will find just about anything here for most users in terms of hair. However, its unrealistic to expect to see every model always conform to your ideals.

Visit We Are Hairy - View Replies - Add Reply

Academy For Slaves Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 09:51:31 PST

Academy For Slaves (0)

02-05-12 09:51am

REVIEW = 65 by jackflash (0)

Pros:
The Idea, it looks good on paper, the navigation is also very good.

Cons:
The Finished product, it fails miserably at what it does and is very expensive for what it delivers, 3 replies in the space of my first month makes a membership look very costly especially when there are no good pics or video to enjoy while waiting (there are a few pages of photo's and some low res video that the moderators ask you to watch, don't expect anything earth shattering though). The tour of the site is also very uninformative.

Bottom Line:
Anyone wanting visual aids, pictures or video will be disappointed,but that's not the idea of this site... The idea is you complete certain tasks, submit them if you wish (for grading) and at the end of each subject you email the moderators for instruction (all so that you become a better slave). Trouble is you have to wait up to a week for the reply (website states 24 hours) and the reply is completely bland a real anti-climax for the wait - it could be a note sent by your bank manager or a flyer from readers digest for all the good it is, certainly not worth waiting a week for - nice idea..poor execution, needs more investment in idea by owners.

Visit Academy For Slaves - View Replies - Add Reply

DDF Network Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:31:06 PST

DDF Network (5)

02-05-12 05:31am

REVIEW = 90 by RustyJ (116)

Pros:
-Super high quality photography. Probably the best I've seen on network level, only beaten by some artsy sites that offer much less otherwise
-1080p H.264 video is flawless if slightly too large in file size
-Very good looking models with some that you don't find so often on other major Euro sites
-Backlog of nearly 10000 scenes
-Sites are very true to their niche. Nothing feels watered down, girls on DDFBusty are busty, HotLegsAndFeet has strong leg/feet focus, HouseOfTaboo is always kinky etc.
-Technical side is good. Quite fast downloads (7 megs per second on dl manager), multiple options for viewing photos, zipped photosets and so on

Cons:
-Recycling. By far my biggest gripe on this site. Basically there is nothing wrong in giving old great scenes a spotlight but the way it's done is outright cheap. The old scenes are sneakily removed, then re-relased some time later as part of the advertised update schedule. Sometimes the preview images even get a 1080p stamp no matter what the truth is
-Slightly slowish rate of truely new scenes, especially those with hardcore content
-Split releases of new scenes in some cases, HouseOfTaboo especially
-Regional pricing. It's not a straight euro/dollar sign change but not fully equal one either
-Quite expensive compared to main competition with pricing and update structure that does not encourage prolonged membership

Bottom Line:
DDFNetwork is probably quite well known to many being one of the largest and longest running Euro sites with a reputation of high quality and beautiful models. Today the network consists of 13 separate sites, some of which are more active, some just archives of old scenes. The sites are:

1ByDay: The largest site where the network apparently originated. Over 4000 scenes focusing on solo and nude scenes. Older ones have hardcore too
HotLegsAndFeet: Over 2000 scenes of foot and leg fetish
SandysFantasies: An archive of old scenes of Sandy and others
OnlyBlowJob: Focuses on oral sex, both ways. Older scenes are often clipped from full scenes but new ones seems made for the purpose
HandsOnHardcore: Male/female hardcore in varying numbers of participants. Updates little too slowly and with many recycled scenes
DDFBusty: Big tits in solo and hardcore action. Pleasantly serious about the size of them tits
HouseOfTaboo: Personal favorite. Creative and inspired selection of various fetishes. Top quality but some niches may leave you cold
CherryJul: Selection of old Cherry Jul scenes. Solo, lesbian and male/female. Very nice but obviously older content
EuroGirlsOnGirls: Lesbian site leaning towards the teeny category
EuroTeenErotica: Younger ladies in solo, lesbian and male/female scenes. Sometimes with awkward props and clothing
EveAngelOfficial: Eve Angel in various setups. Alone and with other girls
SexVideoCasting: Casting type action, solo and male/female. I think the low quality is part of the genre
HairyTwatter: Hairier side of the entertainment. Nothing ridiculous but still not my kind of porn

All these sites are very high in quality of photography with the exception of the casting site. Videos look very good in high definition 720p and 1080p when available while the older content obviously looks slightly aged. This network has always had the top selection of models available and production and photography/video shooting is very professional. Personally I'm more into photos and these guys arguably have the best photography of all the big sites. While the image size has not changed over the last years and some sites have overtaken in this matter, the 2000pix wide is still more than most can see on their screens.

The backlog is huge with nearly 10000 separate scenes. The numbers are however a bit misleading as in the past when the sites were separate the scenes used to be released on all individual sites if the content matched their niche. One can easily notice this by making a category search that returns same scene multiple times in a row.

Where this network does not always shine is the number of all new updates. Especially if one is into hardcore, he might really spend weeks waiting for anything suiting his fancy. The only site updating with guaranteed hardcore scenes is HandsOnHardcore and unfortunately they have one of the least frequent update schedules with old recycled scenes often re-released.

I give the score of 90 as an average of what it would be to different kinds of users. If you are new to this site, I'd call this very highly recommendable up to score of 95. There is so much to view and download in the archive of this network that one month probably is not long enough membership for one to lose taste even with heavy use and wide bandwidth. For prolonged memberships however it is not my choice of site. Surely I join again and again but sometimes whole weeks may go by without nothing really cathing your attention and you feel like you are wasting quite expensive membership. One of the best sites at what it does, I only wish it did more of it.

Visit DDF Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Oldje Review

Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:13:50 PST

Oldje (4)

02-05-12 04:13am

REVIEW = 68 by selphy (15)

Pros:
- Fantastic and Beautiful Girls (nice and young famous pornstars but also semi pro models)
- New videos are in HD 1280 (most of them are not in HD but the format is acceptable, 720x404)
-There are photo and screen cap of the videos
Original and exclusive content that combine romantic sex and a little fetish (old and fat man- with young and beautiful girls)

Cons:
-There are about 350 videos but 150 of them are in real media and their quality are poor (about 200x100; I've deleted those files...)
-No model info
-Old files are divided in two or three parts
-The files you downloaded are not named, so you have to renamed them (boring)
-No update info (1 new episode per week)
-Navigation is plan and the login is boring (userid, pwd and captcha).
-The server timeout is too short; it's about 2 hours, and at the and you have to re-log in
-No bonus site (I thought that the other Class3some site was included)
-The are music inside the video and often you can't hear the "voice" of the performers.

Bottom Line:
I was intersting in this particular content, most of all because the preview of the site showed a lot of beautiful girls.
So I become a member a couple of weeks ago. But after two days of surfing this site I was not satisfied at all.
I think that if you have such girls who perform and that especially have performed in the past in your site, you have to re-mastered old videos and offer (about 30 euros a month) to your customer a good quality. Not surely the quality of a 15 Mb video in .rm format !!
Otherwise you had to offer one or two quality bonus site !
The same company has also Class3some: it appears a good site (the same girls of Oldje) with only about 50 video.
Why does not offer the two site at the same price ?
Oldje is expensive if you think that 1/3 of its content is not usable, but if the Company offers Class3some togheter with Oldje, I think the 30 euro price is correct.

Well, If you are interersting in old-young sex the new video of Oldje are really good ! But remember that only about 200 video (the new ones) are really usable (not less than 720 x 404)

Visit Oldje - View Replies - Add Reply

Streamate.com Review

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:40:34 PST

Streamate.com (2)

02-04-12 07:40pm

REVIEW = 87 by jd66 (0)

Pros:
A wide variety of models and a very large selection to choose from.
Many models offer a very affordable party chat show

Cons:
Too many models with limited English language skills
Per minute prices are often high and they are not posted on the profile so you can see what they are when you enter a chat room

Bottom Line:
Overall, this is a fun site and many of the models are very personable in free chat. There is something here for just about everyone

Visit Streamate.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Strip Game Central Review

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 13:31:06 PST

Strip Game Central (1)

02-04-12 01:31pm

REVIEW = 60 by RagingBuddhist (45)

Pros:
+ Unique Content
+ Reasonable download speeds @ >500 kb/s (see bottom line)
+ Newest files in high resolution (see cons)
+ Choice of four resolutions for newest video - FHD @ 1920x1080, HQ & HR @ 720x576 and LQ @ 352x288
+ No upsells splashed all over the site
+ Trial at $16.95 for ten days, renewing at $9.95 a month until cancelled. Regular $29.95 sub also renews at $9.95
+ Easy join and cancel through CCBill

Cons:
- Somewhat haphazard navigation
- Erratic and slow in coming updates
- Picture quality roughly that of a dated point and shoot camera
- One format - mp4 - except for a few oldest files in divx avi format
- Search function lacks categories - search by keyword without a list to choose from
- Motion blur in Full HD video

Bottom Line:
Always on the prowl for new amateur content, this seemed like a novel concept, so I took the plunge. I'll have to say that I was entertained for a bit but not completely happy I joined. It's rare when I don't stay on a site almost constantly after I join to download all I can. I did save most of the higher resolution video but didn't bother with the older stuff and the pictures. As of the date of my trial subscription there were 10 Full HD, 32 HiDef, 11 High Res videos, the rest being 1990 looking files. By the time I got down to the low resolution videos, I stopped downloading. There are also 92 Picture sets running from ~60 to ~100 pics. Zip files for SOME picture sets are available, but removed after a year. As I said in my earlier comment, I just don't understand a site, especially a smaller one, removing their better material, or worse yet, completely removing something they've put up.
*******************
The Member home page brings you to links for eight sections, all of which are pictures, except videos, of course (Item count in parentheses): Games(92), Videos(174*), Auditions(51), Girls(28), Ranking(16), Clothed and Naked(10), Best Pics Gallery(48) and Zip Files(14) *Counting different resolutions of the same file.

> "Games" - Links to all pic sets

> "Videos" - With only nine videos per page and ony one file format, I see no need for a click to get to the download link. For picture sets of a game, there are only six thumbnails, thankfully large, but centered on the page with wide wasted borders on both sides. Navigation would be greatly simplified by using the open area to decrease the number of page clicks needed to view an entire gallery.

> "Auditions" - Links to 51 picture sets

> "Girls" - Expecting links to her photos and videos, and got a thumbnail pic of her face. A wasted page, in my opinion, considering the home page has a list of the players with all of her links.

> "Ranking" - 16 models thumbnails, linking to five SMALL (500px) pictures of her face, breasts, pussy, legs and bottom.

> "Clothed and Naked" - Ten thumbnails that link to ten pics - on two pages?

> "Best Pics" - 48 pics (1280px) on 6 pages

> "Zip Files" - Links to 15 zip files from recent updates, removed after one year
*******************
Download speeds are adequate considering the amount of content and size of the files. There's not much here that doesn't take but a minute or two to download.

I noticed some motion blur in the Full HD movies. The GSpot codec appliance seems to indicate that files have been upscaled from 1440x1080 to 1920x1080, resulting in the blurring.

With no ability to arrange updates in order of date, there's no way to get a fix on what resolution picture you're going to get. Most pics I saw were 1280 pixels on the long side.
*******************
The bottom line for me is that this site needs a lot of work to bring it up to speed. There haven't been any updates in the week I've been on the site, the pictures are small by today's standards and the video quality is average. All that, with the navigation sitting on the haphazard side and the removing of content, I wouldn't re-join until I saw news of major changes here.

Visit Strip Game Central - View Replies - Add Reply

See Me Tease Review

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 12:22:13 PST

See Me Tease (0)

02-04-12 12:22pm

REVIEW = 97 by jd66 (0)

Pros:
The site features a quality roster of models who are personable, beautiful, and engaging. The price per minute for group and private chat is very reasonable so you can get good value for your money. Also the site features weekly themed shows in free group chat with their best models. Site support is quick, efficient, and friendly.

Cons:
Relatively small number of models working with the site but the site is slowly expanding when they find more high quality models. The site's payment service does not store your credit card information for future use so you have to submit it entirely each time. It takes longer to process a purchase but it might also be safer from hackers

Bottom Line:
It is the site that I like best for chat, both free and private. I would recommend visiting this site to anyone who want to have a fun time talking with a beautiful woman.

Visit See Me Tease - View Replies - Add Reply

My XXX Pass Review

Sat, 04 Feb 2012 11:20:17 PST

My XXX Pass (1)

02-04-12 11:20am

REVIEW = 80 by shooter (7)

Pros:
Lots of exclusive content spanning several years.

New vids are available in hd for the past few years.

Excellent search features.

Easy site navigation.

Cons:
Redundant content featuring blow jobs and facails.

Only one update about every other day.

Most of the network sties no longer update.

Bottom Line:
Myxxxpass is the home network for a group of sites that generally fall within the same content. There are 14 sites included in all but only four are currently updated generally. The sites that update regularly are 1000 facials, only teen blowjobs, mommy blows best, and throated. All fours site focus on blow jobs and facials, the only difference is the age of the models and throated focuses more on rough deep throating. Each of these sites are updated about once a week so you get four or five updates in a week. The action is all oral sex and most end in a facial, though some end in a swallow or cum on tits. This is the focus for the network for the last year. Some of the older 1000 facials videos has boy/girl sex but most just focus on blowjobs and facials. Most scene of good look models and feature one of two male talent. One has an average load and did almost all the earlier scenes over the years. The other male talent is in some of the newer videos and has a much bigger loads to blast the girls faces with.

The sties have been around since 2003 and there are plenty of videos and models to go back and check out. Some of the older sites such as her 1st interacial and its a big black thing deal with interracial sex. They also have a site called meat your ass and love your tits that have hardcore scenes focusing on those body parts. The other sites include i love monster cocks, stuffed petite, share my cock, soccer mom score, and xxx pillow talk. The last site is softcore all the others focus on hardcore boy/girl sex.

The videos have a large variety to view and download. You have four options for wmv, flv, and mp4 formats each. Two hi-def formats and two lower def formats for each media type. They also have options for mpeg, iphone, and the ipod in lower resoltuon. Of course as you go back years into the content the formats are much narrower and lower quality staring around 2008. Each scene also has a picture gallery, a rating section, comment section, and can be added to your favorites.

For the amouth of contenct and video quality the newtwork is worth checking out. The problem is the content is very redundant and boring with the exception of some of the outstanding models and newbie teens. Updates are regular but few compared to other major network sites. the price for the newtwork is good with all the past episodes available to check out. The streaming and downloads all work great and navigating around the site is easy.

Visit My XXX Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

Action Matures Review

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:12:10 PST

Action Matures (1)

01-30-12 02:12pm

REVIEW = 75 by messmer (123)

Pros:
268 videos, many in 1280x720p HD 3000 bitrate, wmv format.

Older Videos at 640x480p 2000 bitrate, wmv or avi are not bad considering the advances made in quality over the years.

Many mature ladies, some for every taste, but don't expect glamor.

All contents are hardcore which is a plus for many.

Cons:
The typical Ferro minimalism. No search engine, no model base, no scene description.

Lack of co-ordination between the various sites. I just received this one as a bonus and once again had to feed it my awkward generated user name and password. Other sites manage to make navigation between their sites easier, why can't Ferro.

The very strong feeling that the network is on cruise control without anyone at the helm. Last update to this site was in October 2011. It looks as if they have given up and just collect money now for what they have accumulated over the years.

Only one download at a time possible. Attempts to download a second one at the same time will fail.

The same HUGE watermarks as in their other sites. This is especially noticeable in the 640x480p videos with their smaller windows.

No pictures.

Bottom Line:
This site might be worth a subscription to you if you like hardcore and reasonably mature women.

The picture quality in most videos is excellent, only spoiled for me by those accursed large watermarks on top and bottom. If you don't mind those then there is enough of what looks to be exclusive material to keep you happy for a while ... especially since one monthly subscription brings four bonus sites with it.

Just be warned that Ferro must be getting ready to leave a sinking ship, judging by the rarity of updates in all sites I have looked at so far, as well as deafening silence when it comes to support.

I won't be back but Ferro might strike a chord with you, so I'll give it a 75. Not great, but tolerable.

Visit Action Matures - View Replies - Add Reply

Pornstar Network Review

Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:51:34 PST

Pornstar Network (2)

01-30-12 12:51pm

REVIEW = 65 by namenick (0)

Pros:
navigation setup
frequency of updates
system to favorite certain stars / scenes

Cons:
content feels outdated / old
much of updated content is old movies / DVD's
much of updated content is from studios I personally don't care for

Bottom Line:
Bottom line is that VideosZ and Xmovies are pretty much the same and I thought updated content was of higher quality. I'm not just talking about the actual video quality, but the content of the videos. For the month I was a member they kept updating from the same lame supposed amateur series.

I think trying to be too broad and fill too many niches waters the whole thing down

Visit Pornstar Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Exploited Teens Review

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:59:36 PST

Exploited Teens (3)

01-29-12 01:59pm

REVIEW = 75 by shooter (7)

Pros:
Amateur teen girls in hardcore scenes.

Plain yet simple site navigation.

Lots of past models to watch.

Cons:
Very plain site with lack of options.

Expensive for a site only updated once a week.

Bottom Line:
Exploited teens is nice if you like to see real amateur teens in action. All the scenes are generally the same. They are all shot in pov style and have the same guy/camera man in every scene. It gets redundant but you know what you'll get with every scene but with a fresh new teen model. Scene starts off with an interview, then the girl getting naked, before sucking his dick and taking him in her pussy. Most scenes end with a decent facial and a lot have the girl take the load in her mouth and some swallow. The guy can get annoying and says the same cheesy jokes in evey scene. 'Wow what do I have three nuts,' and 'I was a good squirel and saved up my nuts' he says to every girl while ejaculating on their faces. Every girl. His loads are decent but by no means as large as he tends to brag about in porn world.

There are videos only. There are about ten pages of 'hi-def' videos and 16 of regular past videos. You can doenload the whole video or break it in six smaller parts. The only format is wmv 640X480. There is no search funtion at all. You simply have pages with the models picture and name and click on it to bring up her simple download page. There is no comment or ranking system either for the videos.

This is a fun site to see amateur teens in action but quickly gets boring. For the price of $30 a month its a bit much for only one new model a week but you do get several hundred past updates to check out.

Visit Exploited Teens - View Replies - Add Reply

Jugg Master Review

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:34:17 PST

Jugg Master (2)

01-29-12 01:34pm

REVIEW = 85 by BubbaGump (12)

Pros:
+ Unique fetish content.
+ Creative photography.
+ Good nostalgic value.
+ Low subscription price.
+ One-month non-reccuring costs the same as ongoing monthly subscription rates.

Cons:
- Low resolution images only.
- Primitive site navigation and layout.
- Site does not appear to be growing much.
- Videos are just a novelty.

Bottom Line:
I can give all the reasons why you might or might not find this site attractive. However, If you know who hese models are without Googling, my guess is that there is a high probabilty that you would enjoy viewing the models at this site--Maria Moore, Denise Davies, Bunny De La Cruz.

If you don't know these names but have a breast fetish or enjoy viewing images of women with truly oversized and natural breasts, meaty nipples, and saucer-sized areola, this site would also be worth a one-month subscription.

If none of the above is true, you should look elsewhere. That's it in a nuthsell. This is a very simple site oriented towards photography. There are videos, but they are simply small low-resolution clips. The videos serve more as a novelty of sorts and really are not worth commenting on.

The site is entirely sofcore. Most of the photosets are of the slow tease variety. They start with the model fully clothed and proceed to various states of undress, with the emphasis always placed on the breasts. You see a lot of images of huge boobs jutting through bras, dangling in the air, or spilling out of clothing items. Many of the sets were taken in natural lighting, outdoors and in pools.

I did come across some full nudes, but this is the exception, not the norm. This is conservative, old-school erotic photography. It is the opposite of today's in-your-face erotica, although there is a section called juggs-eye view, where there are many images of breasts dangling in front of the camera, as if in your face.

IMO, the photographer does a wonderful job with posing. You can tell that he is into the subject. He is just not going through the motions. The photographer has a talent for bringing out the best features of the models and does a good job with angles. The natural lighting and the lack of intense post-processing adds to the natrual appeal of the models. Many of the churn-it-and-burn photographers in this genre simply have the model strip nude and take straigh-on shots of breasts. Post-processing is overused and images suffer from harsh artifical lighting. The approach is very forumlatic. If you've seen one photo, you've seen them all. The photographer here is always creative and uses various angles to capture and profile the breasts-- from the side. the rear, the front, arms in the air, etc.. These won't be the most professional-looking images in terms of lighting and studio backdrops. However, this is more than made up for with the way that the photographer deals with the models.

You will see many of the mdoels elsewhere at the classic breast sites. The sets themselves are all unique, howeve. I know many of the models well from my years of viewing this genre and have never come across these images. Many of the photo sets contain images of popular Big Breast models in their younger years-- Maria Moore, Denise Davies, etc. If you are a fan of these models, you might think this is worth the cost of admission, simply for their nostalgic value.

Where content starts to drop in quality is in image resolution, and this is my only beef about the galleries. This content represents a very unique and sometimes nostalgic cdollection. The photographer should offer these images at higher resolutions. They appear to max out at around 11100x710 and many of the older sets appear to be old chrome scans of low resolution around 700x400. As this is primnarily a photo site, there should be high-resoltion images available.

The site design and navigation is very primitive and has an amateur look to it. I never had any trouble getting to content I wanted to view but the site should be cleaned up a bit to supply it with a more modern interface.

This site obviously wont be for everyone. Unless you can find a way to place natural-looking, ten-pound each breasts on the frame of a ninety-pound runway model, you are left with finding them on women of the voluptuous and BBW variety. If this turns you off, you will likely not find the content appealing. Also, if you cannnot live without high resolution images, you also will be dissapointed.

It was somehwat difficult to provide a score as this site doesn't claim to be a slick and professional studio and is basicallty the work of a single photographer displaying a photo collection that has been accumulated throughout the years. Please take this into consideration when viewing the score. I ended up rating it based on what it meant to me as someone with a breast feitsh and lover of voluptuous women. I would rate it even higher if the not for the relatively low resolution galleries. As a one-month only quick stop for those with a fetish for oversized breasts, its worth a try, especially given the modest price and the unique content.

Visit Jugg Master - View Replies - Add Reply

Broke Amateurs Review

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:44:44 PST

Broke Amateurs (1)

01-29-12 09:44am

REVIEW = 80 by shooter (7)

Pros:
True amateur girls.

Nice set ups with interviews that help you get to know the girl before the action.

Good amount of videos with different girls.

Cons:
Expensive for only one update a week.

Only one update a week.

Very few options and no search feature.

Lay out is simple but plain.

Bottom Line:
Broke amateurs is a great little amateur porn site. The same guy gets girls to come in and do a porn scene with him. All the girls are newbies and most likely won't be seen anywhere else. Most are younger girls but he does occasionaly have a scene with an older milf. The scenes generally follow the same format. He interviews the girl then has her give him a blow job and gets them to try some deep throating. Some are better than it than others. He then shoots an enormous load of jizz into their mouths and has them swallow it. Suprisingly most can handle it but some have trouble thats fun to see. He then has the girl play with her self using a toy before finally fucking them. Some of the scenes he is able to get the girl to do anal. Then most scene end with another huge load of jizz to the face. Some end with a cream pie. The cum shots are got from different angles and shown in slow motion afterwards. Then an exit interview with the girl. He is very nice and courteos to the girls and though some are pushed to the limit they all seem to have a good time thats nice to see.

There are only videos available. You can stream them or download a high or low quality version. There is also a link to a blog he has the gives some info on the scenes and upcoming girls. The videos come in standard 640X480 wmv format.

Overall a fun amateur site where you can see real amateur girls in action. The downside is for #30 a month you get one update a week and a bare bones kind of site. Worth checking out though especially with access to close to 200 scenes.

Visit Broke Amateurs - View Replies - Add Reply

VideoBox Review

Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:07:37 PST

VideoBox (11)

01-29-12 09:07am

REVIEW = 95 by shooter (7)

Pros:
Huge amount of vids with varied content.
Great price for the amount of content.
Excellent search features and options.
Daily updates of 5 new videos.

Cons:
Content is not exclusive, its videos from other porn production companies.
Only offers one hi-def video a day out of the five offered.
Extra charges for certain studios.

Bottom Line:
Videobox is an excellent porn site with a lot to offer. They have daily updates with five full videos a day.

The content focuses on main stream porn though they do occasionally have a fetish video including some trannie porn and bdsm. Most of the content is straight boy/girl sex from big porn companies such as lethal hardcore, vince voyeur studios, and now even jules jordan. Of course they also have lesbian scenes and gang bang videos. The search feature allows you to search for niche content easily and has a porn model search feature but for female porn stars only.

Vivid and evil angel have a seperate chanel with one video added every other day but there is an additional monthly fee for full access. They also have added content for reality kings and kink recently for other additonal charges. How ever the main site has several thousand porn videos you can download, stream, and even make your own custom clips that offers endless hours of porn surfing.

Each day at 8am eastern time they add five vidoes. The videos show up with their covers. You can click on the video and it shows each scene with six screen shots to give you and idea of the content. Most videos also have a description and the names of the femal porn stars in the video and scene. Each scene has the option to download in wmv, at 640X480, 480X362 iphone at 320X240 and H.264 at 640X480. Also one video a day has a hi-def opetion for download. Videos can also be streamed by flash player and you can cut and make your own custom clip if you don't eant to download the whole scene and save disk space on your device. Each scene and video also has a comment section where you can add your thoughts or reviews for the scenes.

Overall videobox has an enormous porn collection of content with something for everyone. For the price and the vast amount of content this site can't be beat.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply

Nubiles Review

Sat, 28 Jan 2012 08:53:46 PST

Nubiles (7)

01-28-12 08:53am

REVIEW = 92 by rearadmiral (141)

Pros:
- Huge site
- Excellent quality pictures and videos
- Pictures and videos given equal effort
- Stunning models
- Good mix of North American, European and Russian models
- Some porn A-listers and some relative unknowns
- Many options for downloads
- Well organized site (simple where it doesn�t need to be complex)
- Good mix of softcore, girl-girl and hardcore
- Best search function I�ve ever encountered
- Supports download managers
- Older material appears to have been �remastered� to make it look better

Cons:
- Fairly tame for fans of hardcore

Bottom Line:
Subjectively, this really isn�t my kind of site. Having said that, this is a repeat membership for me since this was one of the first pay sites I joined six or seven years ago. I was impressed then, and I�m still impressed.

Most PU members will know this site, so I won�t spend a lot of time describing it. Nubiles is a huge site featuring a bewildering array of young, beautiful models from around the world. There is enough variation in body type and age that anyone could join the site and find hundreds of models to fit his taste. The majority of the models are American (with some porn girls here too), Eastern European and Russian. But many other nationalities are represented too. The site currently says there are 1030 models, close to 600,000 pictures and over 5400 movies. I have no reason to think they�re making that up.

Most sites seem to fall into either being a picture site or a video site. If they do one well, the other is just a necessary add-on. Not so here. Regardless if you�re a picture guy or a video guy you�ll see the site as exceeding your expectations. One format isn�t dominant over the other and one doesn�t detract from the other. This is a lesson many other large site could learn.

Nubiles has been around since 2004 so you�ll obviously find some variation in picture and video quality. Having said that, it appears that the site has always pushed the limits of technology so even back in 2004 they were better than most. Even the oldest pictures and videos still look good. It also appears that some of the videos have been �remastered� to make them better. If this is true, and I think it is, this underscores the site�s efforts to provide the best quality available.

All but the oldest picture sets on the site are available in two sizes. All sets are available as singles or as a zip. The newer photos in high res come in at 1600x2400 and the low res are 800x1200. The older pictures are 800x1200, which would have been amazing quality in 2004. They may have been updated at some point. Photos sets vary from 60+ photos to 100+ photos. Subjectively, the quality is excellent.

Videos are available in a wide variety of formats and sizes. There aren�t many other sites that offer this many options. Even the oldest videos on the site can be streamed or can be downloaded in multiple formats. Newer videos are available as streams in three different resolutions. Downloads are available in wmv, mpg, mp4 (low and high res), avi and mobile. Older scenes also offer the video in segments. My preference is WMV so that�s what I downloaded. They use codec 9 and the videos are 1280x720 @3600kb/s and 30fps. Subjectively, they look great.

The search function on the site is incredibly complex in its operation but simple to use. It allows a member to sort models by personal attributes. The usual traits are listed, such as breast size, hair colour, race and age, but there are some obscure attributes that can be sorted too, like braces, skin tone (tanned or not) and even by nipple type. You can search by type of outfit, You want to see a model smoking? You can sort by that too. The setting is searchable too. I know I said that Met Art has the best search function I�ve ever seen, but Nubiles is better still.

One thing I�ve never seen before and I wish would catch on is the ability for members to post links to other pay sites where the model has material. This is great for models who change their names a lot. To me, this function demonstrates the professionalism and customer-interest that Nubiles has.

The only negative I can think of is purely subjective: the site is just a bit too tame for my liking. There are lesbian and hardcore scenes here, but they aren�t the main focus. Hardcore isn�t just an add-on, because those scenes are very well done, but the main focus is solo girl and solo masturbation. If you�re a hardcore fan there is enough here to warrant a membership but you won�t find anything that pushes the limits. I only found one anal scene, for example.

The bottom line is that if you�re an active porn buyer you owe it to yourself to check this site out. It doesn�t try to be everything to everyone (the lack of �hard� hardcore, for example), but what it does it does almost perfectly. The models are amazing, the photos and videos are well done and the site is laid out to help you find what interests you. I highly recommend Nubiles. It is definitely on my list of sites for repeat memberships.

(One last thing: I only noticed this on one scene, but I wonder if other older scenes have the same issue. There�s a scene with �Kate,� aka Kathleen Kruz where she gives a blowjob and the scene has been edited to jump right into the event. The original scene had a brief but playful setup that made the scene so much better. I hope this hasn�t happened in many other scenes. In my opinion, the setup is as important as the sex.)

Visit Nubiles - View Replies - Add Reply

Kiara Mia Review

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:58:46 PST

Kiara Mia (1)

01-26-12 11:58pm

REVIEW = 55 by exotics4me (431)

Pros:
- Kiara Mia is a very pretty solo model who is hard to find content of.
- If you try to leave the site after taking the tour you are offered a lower price of $19.75.
- Some pictures have extremely high resolutions, some go near 6000 long end.
- Site is fast
- 13 similar solo sites included in membership

Cons:
- Where to start? First of all the site has no downloads to speak of. You can't download the videos and though some of the picture sets have a download link, it doesn't work.
- Really old style of updates, including up to 10 parts/updates for ONE photoset. Videos are also updated this way and can be streamed.
- From looking at two of the bonus sites, Isis Taylor, Nina Mercedez, those sites also offer no downloads.
- To ask $30 for this group of poor sites with very low quantity counts is borderline criminal. Honestly, I don't even like this model anymore. That's how disgusted this site made me.
- Speaking of criminal, some of the videos and picture sets are from Brazzers and Aziani. I'm sure they have rights to use those, but I already had those videos from Brazzers and Aziani.
- Archived webcam shows are poor. One includes Kiara fully dressed until the last 2 minutes, just sitting and talking. I joined a porn site not a "tell me about your GD life site".

Bottom Line:
I probably could have went on with cons for another 1000 characters or so. I am not kidding when I say this or exaggerating, I cancelled my membership with this site within 9 minutes of joining it, according to my ccbill receipts. I got burnt on some solo sites a few months ago. Made myself write, "I will not fall for those solo sites anymore" 500 times, then fell for it again.

There is a little good. I tell you though, you're going to have to work to get the good. The good is you can use a legal bulk image software downloader to download all the photos in each set.

Every set that has a "download this set in zip" link gives me a 403 Forbidden message when I click it, so using the bulk downloader was the only choice since I'm not going to go back to 1998 and do right click save as on each photo.

Most of the pictures are 1500x1000, but I would say 15-20% are in the 3500x6000 range. The reason I had been drawn to this model was a set I saw on Reality Kings that had her in it for about 1-2 minutes. It was one of those sets that has 15-20 women in it. She really stood out in that video and I had been looking for content of her ever since seeing it. I did a few sets on Brazzers, but haven't had much luck anywhere else.

So these pictures, despite being a pain in the ass to download, are pretty rare. There also are a lot of pictures. The thing is, there isn't a lot of sets. For those that were around porn sites in the early 2000s, you'll know this practice that this group of sites practices.

Here's what you see when you join. There are 20 photo sets per page and there are 15 pages. That's 300 photo sets. Right? Or roughly. Hell, lets say 250 photo sets.

Looking on my hard drive, there are roughly 50 photo sets. These include sets as small as 15 photos of Kiara at a gay/lesbian celebration. I don't have 50, my count is 37, but I grouped most of the candid ones into one folder so I'm giving them a boost when I say 50. I can tell you that there are roughly 4,000 photos. You can do the math. They have 250 or so photo sets listed, 4,000 pictures, there's roughly 15-25 photos in each set. Now for the fun part. You'll find photos that went with a set updated in late 2009, in the late 2010 updates and have to drop them into the right folder.

I can't support that. It's misleading, it's 2012, piece photo sets together over 7-8 updates is a hassle and a cheap way to boost the content count. This wouldn't have been so bad if the videos weren't done the same way, but they are. This gets worse too. Besides only allowing streaming, they release a video in parts, 2-5 on some, then they release the "full" video as a new update.

This site's earliest content is dated 8-3-2009. That means this site is nearly 2.5 years old. It has roughly 40-50 photo sets and around 20 full videos. Based on this pace, the site has been up for 129 weeks, thanks date duration calculator and has roughly 60-70 full scenes or photo sets.

I can't tell you how pitiful that is and it's still updating too. They list their updates now as 3-4 times a week, but they are tiny pieces of full sets of photos or tiny pieces of videos. Plus you have to go through the hassle of using an image downloader and can't download the movies.

On the blog, Kiara has posted one time that I see. On her twitter which is linked to the site, she mostly brags about how much money she is making. That didn't help my perception of her. Oh and lets go back to late 90s, early 2000s again, she has a wish list too of all the things you are welcome to buy her and send her. There's something to be said about models who are satisfied with people willing to pay money to look at them naked.

Technically, the photos are good to excellent. Nice resolutions, colors, settings and poses. The videos vary in streaming quality since some do come from other sites. Some look to be 720p, maybe, others look to be in the 480p range.

The webcam shows are still active, I think. There was one in the last month, but there was a full 6 month lull in these also in the archived section. Sadly, the best ones are the ones of her just talking. The others are webcam recordings of photo shoots. That's exciting, huh? Lets watch photo or video shoots from a blurry camera across on the other side of the room!

Not to worry to the webmaster or Kiara, I'm not making fun of you all. I'm obviously the dumbass here. I will enjoy the pictures though after 6 hours of loading a bulk downloader. Oh and on that, a few of the newer sets have broken image links, so you can't even use the bulk downloader on those. I gave the site 5 points for having a nice looking site and a rare model. That is how my recommendation for this site will work.

If, like me, you just have to have those 4,000 pictures of her and don't mind the hassle of the image downloader then you might not feel too ripped off. Otherwise, unless you just like throwing money down the drain, don't join this site.

Visit Kiara Mia - View Replies - Add Reply

Busty Madison Blush Review

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 04:02:14 PST

Busty Madison Blush (1)

01-26-12 04:02am

REVIEW = 76 by Jutti24 (8)

Pros:
-) Straightforward browsing and layout

-) Has the unique Madison Blush as the only model

-) Bonus access to other solo-woman sites.

-) Image resolution is decent.

-) Image downloading using download-managers is straightforward and easy.

Cons:
-) Server sometimes crashed while I was browsing the site once.

-) Softcore only - be aware of that.

-) Major fault: very very little content considering the hefty membership fee. As of late Januay '12 there are 22 photosets of Madison Blush.

-) about 29 USD for a month

-) no idea how frequent updates are.

Bottom Line:
All in all I am less excited about this website. While I admire the model and try to collect all the content that's around on the web of her, this website should be avoided. 29 USD is a lot for solo softcore content with only 22 photosets so far.

Maybe if the price would be about 19USD and with more content the score would be a lot better.

Visit Busty Madison Blush - View Replies - Add Reply

Jugg Master Review

Thu, 26 Jan 2012 03:56:33 PST

Jugg Master (2)

01-26-12 03:56am

REVIEW = 84 by Jutti24 (8)

Pros:
Lots of different women - the non-membership page shows a lot of what you will be able to watch in the members-area

Affordable and cheap!

Lots of content.

Easy to download sets or videos using download-managers

Cons:
Old image content isn't very high-res. (but new content is OK!)

Old videos aren't in particularly high quality (but new content is OK!)

Site navigation is a little bit "creative" but OK overall. No surprises.

Bottom Line:
Very enjoyable considering that the membership fee is in the sub-20 USD range and there is lots of content.
Although keep in mind: there's only softcore, so don't expect more.

Visit Jugg Master - View Replies - Add Reply

abbywinters Review

Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:17:13 PST

abbywinters (3)

01-25-12 12:17am

REVIEW = 95 by Tigger (0)

Pros:
- Beautifull women
- Girls who seem to enyoy themselfs
- No anoying music
- No scripts, it looks like the girls are just doing what they want to do

Cons:
- The price of the site, but I have to say it's worth the money
- You have to know how to find the older movies

Bottom Line:
Can you improve top quality. I don't know, I love the girls, I love the things they do, but most
of all I love the fun they have doing it...For me this is the standard for others sites, but haven't seen anyone coming close. For me this is the site if you are a lesbian sex lover.

Visit abbywinters - View Replies - Add Reply

VideosZ Review

Tue, 24 Jan 2012 15:52:28 PST

VideosZ (4)

01-24-12 03:52pm

REVIEW = 90 by messmer (123)

Pros:
A huge archive of DVDs. Today's count stands at 10441 with five new ones being added daily.

Approximately 350 DVDs are available in HD at present, at 1280x720p. Most are in mp4 format. If you don't like large files there is also the option to download the DVD at reduced quality, again in mp4 or, for the smallest files, in avi format.

Excellent search engine.

Excellent streaming (depending on how many scenes you are downloading while viewing.)

People who like niche content are not forgotten, with studios like Niche and White Ghetto and
others that present the occasional unusual fare being well represented.

No download limits.

Favorite scenes and DVDs can be saved for a viewing or download later on.

Cons:
I really have to stretch to find anything negative to say. Videosz is slightly more expensive than its nearest competitor. It also does not have the capacity to create custom clips, but that's about it for me.

Bottom Line:
I like Videosz, as a matter of fact I like it better than its not-to-be-named main competitor in the DVD business.

I had complained in the past that niche content was being ignored at Videosz in favor of run-of-the-mill mainstream material, and it is true that it still represents only a small part of the whole, but they have way more than, okay I'll name it, Videobox, who are too conscious of the importance of holding on to their target audience to be bold enough to present an update now and then that would most likely be resoundingly rejected by the majority.

I would still like to see more niche material because after long years of porn viewing I do appreciate anything that is different, even if it isn't always pretty, but also understand the law of supply and demand.

I am enough of a realist to understand that if they didn't cater to the majority they would quickly be out of business. So keep on doing what you are doing, Videosz.

Your average update is in no way inferior to anyone else's and I have the feeling you are trying hard to keep everyone happy.

That's good enough for me to give you a high rating.

Visit VideosZ - View Replies - Add Reply

Boys Love Matures Review

Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:39:08 PST

Boys Love Matures (1)

01-23-12 12:39pm

REVIEW = 78 by messmer (123)

Pros:
Mostly attractive mature women.

Latest videos are in HD format at 1280x720p wmv at a bitrate of 3000. Picture is good but could be better.

Videos can be streamed.

Picture sets (All Hardcore) are crisp and come zipped.

Updates are regular.

Cons:
Updates may be regular but are infrequent. As far as I can tell, videos update every three weeks while picture sets update every two weeks, give or take a couple of days.

Content is small with 82 videos. What makes it even worse is that only about twenty of the latest ones are in HD format, the rest are 640x480p.

If you wish to download pictures you are asked for your log-in information all over again. This morning I put in the correct info four times and was rejected all four times. A request for help by support presented me with a captcha that was almost illegible and makes it necessary most of the time to keep changing it until you finally get something you can read.

Only one download at a time, if you attempt more you will get an error message.

Bottom Line:
I got this site as a bonus when I first signed up to Stunning Matures and liked the fact that they at least had streaming where you could check out the videos first.

I also like the fact that they have quality picture sets of the video shoots. I must point out though that the sets are small (50+/-) and that the average picture weighs in at 1500x1000px. Not bad but not exactly cutting edge.

The videos are typically Ferro: The technical expertise is there, but in many the heat is lacking or the premise is improbable.

In one scene, for instance, a �cougar� is attacking a young man with a ferocity that almost amounts to rape while he pretends to be totally disgusted by the whole thing until eventually his juices start flowing and they continue on from there.

In other scenes the couple have barely entered a room when the Mature whips off her clothes, most often behind the surprised �young� man's back. I know these are fantasies but these B grade fantasies are usually only found in erotic stories written by inexperienced boys.

Something that makes more sense leading up to the action would be a great improvement, it needn't be long, just a bit smarter.

One other thing that bothers me is that the �boys� are so often almost of the same age as the matures. Or, to give the site the benefit of the doubt, they appear to be almost as old.

Finally, my biggest beef: The huge watermarks on pictures (lower right hand corner) and videos (lower right hand corner as well as upper left.)

General impression: I suppose if you stay long enough (a month) to accumulate an extra four bonus sites then subscribing to any of the Ferro sites is not a bad deal.

Especially since my criticism of the content quite naturally is highly subjective. I realize that, without a doubt, the videos I pan might be quite erotic and appealing to others, so the site didn't get the same low mark I gave to �Stunning Matures.�

As for me, I have cancelled already after two days because I just can't get warm to their site set-up, the difficulty in obtaining pictures and the incredibly huge water marks. If the videos and pictures I might download from added bonus sites during the month turn out to have smaller water marks I might be nudging the score up a bit.

Visit Boys Love Matures - View Replies - Add Reply

Pornpros Mobile Review

Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:39:06 PST

Pornpros Mobile (1)

01-22-12 02:39pm

REVIEW = 80 by atrapat (110)

Pros:
- Mobile version of Porn Pros Network.
- Accessible with main network membership.
- Big buttons, clean layout, simple structure.
- Two layout versions : light and regular.
- Images are 480x320. 8-10 per scene. All landscape.
- Mobile-friendly image slideshow implementation.
- Videos: MP4 400x224 (800 & 300bps), 3gp 352x288 (300bps).
- All videos also available in 8 parts (highest resolution only).
- Video parts have representative thumbnails.
- Links to mobile versions of official blog and twitter.
- Scenes grouped by site, category, stars or date order.
- Ads for other sites don't get in the way.
- No need to login on every visit.

Cons:
- They claim 6,000+ scenes but �only� have around 2,200.
- Fixed 320px site width. May look small on newest devices.
- Only 10 images per scene.
- Older scenes have no pictures or not all video formats.
- No scene trailers but mobile free tour has them.
- Search function doesn�t work for model names.
- On scene page, no info on which site it comes from.
- Video and images resolutions may be too low for newest devices.
- Several minor bugs make the experience less pleasing.
- Pictures don't work in light version.
- Nags as in main site: scene recycling, model identification, etc.

Bottom Line:
This is the mobile version of US reality porn site Porn Pros Network. It�s a simple yet complete site, good for checking new updates and for the occasional viewing. Things go increasingly bad in older scenes: as you go backwards in time, you start finding scenes with no photos, videos or any content at all. As I've said in the past speaking of mobile porn sites from other networks, I don�t think it�s worth signing up just for the mobile site but it's a nice addition to the main membership.

The picture part is remarkable even though they offer 10 images per scene at most. Instead of mimicking what�s usually available in non-mobile sites (hundreds of images, many of them almost identical, in a thumbnail gallery) they go for a slideshow with the most representative landscape ones. A single orientation is good because you don�t have to keep rotating your phone to make the most of your screen real estate. Images don�t seem to be picked at random and I was under the impression that not all images were also available in the main site. Next image is automatically preloaded and clicking next loads image without refreshing page, so getting an idea of what kind of images the scene has is fast. You may get back to the main scene page by a simple back button click. All around, a simple but thought-out functionality.

Video viewing is fairly well done. I�d appreciate getting trailers, tough. Just as viewing 10 images serves great for sampling the pictures from an update, it would make sense if they offered in the members section the trailers that are already available in the mobile free tour. Trailers are also available inside main members area.

Flaws from the main site crept into the mobile version. Scenes that the main site recycles get recycled here too. My pet peeve is the lack of proper model identification. They only have room for one model name; with luck, one of the models gets her name entered but some scenes get just two first names. The mobile site has flaws and bugs of its own, like some weird issues with the numbering in galleries and failing to identify in a scene page what site it comes from.

There are some extras that make sense in a mobile site. There�s a twitter feed of the most recent tweets from PornPros official account, although there�s something wrong with its integration with the official Twitter App. They also have a mobile optimized version of their blog and the BTS videos played without issues on my phone.

Visit Pornpros Mobile - View Replies - Add Reply

Club Tug Review

Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:41:23 PST

Club Tug (1)

01-21-12 06:41pm

REVIEW = 62 by standard (5)

Pros:
- Allows download manager (DTA)

- Decent download speeds when accessible.

- Some photo sets are zipped.

Cons:
Some truly unattractive women. 50% or more if I had to guess. Not beer-goggles women. I mean actual homely and/or fat and homely women. It's easy to pick out the (attractive) pros' videos because they're the ones you don't squint and scroll past.

***HORRIBLE VIDEO QUALITY***. The highest setting looks to be 640x426 @ 2700kbps WMV, and most vids are around 100MB. Think 1998. Remember the old free Bang Bus clips you'd find in xxx galleries? Yep, that bad.

Add to that poor lighting, bad angles, etc.

Seriously, the video quality is so bad that sometimes I only knew the guy had orgasmed because I saw a change in the woman's stroking tempo.

Joined on Saturday morning. Their server was overwhelmed and inaccessible by 9am and I couldn't view any pages until that evening. Fortunately:

Very little content available. Divide that by half (unless you like homely women in low-res videos) and you've got an entire network that you can browse and download in less than 1/2 a da

Bottom Line:
Avoid.

Overpriced and outdated. Fortunately I clicked through to the signup page and then attempted to leave. I was offered 10 days for $10 and decided to try it.

I still feel a bit ripped off because one day is all you need. Clubtug has 13 pages with 12 vids each. Cumblastcity, seemomsuck, and over40handjobs have less than a dozen pages total with 12 vids on each page. I'd give you an exact number, but the server is inaccessible again.

UPDATE 1/22/12- Total pages of the four sites mentioned above is 30, with 12 (fewer if it's the last page) vids on each, and many repeats between sites.

My DTA queue has just over 200 videos lined up for download and I've seen every page. If I saturated my DSL line I could've had the entire network (well, all I wanted) downloaded in a few hours.

BTW, many of those other sites have repeats. Maybe only 35% of the videos are worth getting after you factor in the ugly girls and the redundancies.

I can only go on my opinion, and no one can account for personal taste. I like clavicles, tan-lines, and almost-invisible hair in backlit photos of thighs. Other people won't find that appealing. But dang there are some unattractive women on this site. More power to you if that's your thing, but I'm guessing you could find an ugly woman site with higher quality videos and photos.

That said, the photos are occasionally decent, although they're web-viewing size only. It doesn't redeem the site, but it should be mentioned. Unfortunately not every video has photos, and those that do aren't always zipped and available for downloading unless you're willing to click and save each individual photo.

Not recommended.

Visit Club Tug - View Replies - Add Reply

Stunning Matures Review

Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:15:17 PST

Stunning Matures (1)

01-21-12 04:15pm

REVIEW = 70 by messmer (123)

Pros:
+ Nice looking mature women
+ Latest videos in HD (1280x720p) in wmv., most of them are approx. 10 - 15 minutes long and look nice and crisp.
+ Fair download speed. My normal speed with most sites is at my maximum of 2.3 MB/s while this site gave me 1.2 MB/s. Not too shabby, though and since most files are around 300 - 400 KB it's not really an issue. However, be aware that this was done with Firefox' DownThemAll, while with Firefox' native downloader the speed was more like 250 KB/s.

Cons:
- The most "bare minimum" member's page I have ever seen.
- Only updates once every two weeks.
- A total of 90 videos ONLY starting in 2008.
- Huge Watermarks in videos in lower right and upper left of videos! Very distracting and unnecessary.
- Allows only one download at a time.
- No streaming.
- No pictures.
- No search engine.
- No information on videos.
- No model list.

Bottom Line:
First let me say that the ugly grandma on their tour page does not represent the majority of the mature women, most of whom are actually quite good looking if you like them a tad older than thirty-five.

Having said that, that's almost the only really positive thing I can say about the site.

The member's page is a joke with four small thumbnails of the latest updates shown plus a section below containing page numbers, if you click on those you are taken to another page featuring another 4 small thumbnails, there's no description of the scenes themselves, simply the names of the actors and that's it ... really, really bare bones navigation.

The earlier videos (and you don't have to go back very far) are in 640x480p avi format at a 2000 bitrate. Actually, in all fairness, they don't look too bad, but could be better.

The videos themselves are typically Ferro and lack heat. They are well lighted and filmed but something is missing. The samples I have watched seemed too posed for my liking.

Upon subscribing you are being given an impossible user name and password. I copied and pasted one and wrote down the other just to get into the site where I was promptly informed that I would need further authorization before I could proceed with downloads. So back to G-Mail to click on the authorization link and I was finally a member in good standing.

One bonus site of your choice (from the Ferro network) can be added at this time, but you are once again asked for your user name and password. If you get a site that also contains picture sets (zipped) you have to sign in to that one separately as well. Awkward to say the least.

In order to encourage you to continue to subscribe you are being given an extra bonus site for every week you are a member.

Stunning matures would get no more than 70 from me*** if it weren't for the extra sites that are being added at the time of subscription and in the weeks to follow.

As I can tell by my first bonus, not all Ferro sites are as poorly set up as this one. That's a relief because this site would never survive on its own.

*** This may look a bit confused but I gave the site originally a seventy-five but reduced it to seventy because of their super-sized water marks. This major change was explained in the bar heading the review but then was wiped out by further small corrections I made to the review.

Visit Stunning Matures - View Replies - Add Reply

Step 1 Models Review

Sat, 21 Jan 2012 02:52:25 PST

Step 1 Models (0)

01-21-12 02:52am

REVIEW = 88 by ron2554 (1)

Pros:
Unique as well as exclusive amateur stuffs. They have some of the amateur girls, whom you are not just going to find anywhere else. They are doing everything from masturbation to complete hardcore.

Regular updates in their websites: They keep updating their stuff, which is what I personally loved about them.

Excellent quality: I know some have complained about the video quality being average. However, I feel their video quality is top notch to say the least. And the interactive nature of some of their videos are simply amazing.

And I love their models, especially Ally. She knows how to turn the viewer on in a very short time

In my time with them, I even loved their communication about the updates in the site.. Don find much of that elsewhere

Cons:
The only issue, which I find at the site is that the navigation option can be further improved. Yes, finding a random video is fine, but the ones with the naughtier shoots are what I would love to find at a single click ;)

Bottom Line:
Its a site to be, if you want something new almost all the time and that too from fresh faces :) ....

Visit Step 1 Models - View Replies - Add Reply

Big Tits Round Asses Review

Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:02:50 PST

Big Tits Round Asses (1)

01-20-12 04:02pm

REVIEW = 80 by BubbaGump (12)

Pros:
-- Good amount of content.
-- High video quality
-- Nice range of models.
-- Decent camera work.
-- Intros and elements of tease.

Cons:
-- Download Speeds could be better
-- Poor image quality on stills.
-- Cameraman can be chatty and sometimes the background noises are annoying.
-- Older content lacks in quality.
-- Some models are overused.

Bottom Line:
Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I have this site as part of my BangBros subscription. It is worth a seperate review.

This is my favorite site from the Bangbros collection and was worth the price of admission to the BangBros network. There is a large collection of videos and photosets and the updates seem to appear weekly.

The models range from thin and stacked to voluptuous, with a bias towards the latter. There are a number of well-toned runway model types but the emphasis on this site seems to be more along the lines of curvy women, not thin and petite. If you are looking for the latter, you will likely find the site lacking. My two favorite models are Selena Starr and Jazmyn. Although the site is named Big Tits, Round Asses, the emphasis here is definately on the former.

There is enough content to keep the breast lover happy for a while. Site updates appear to happen weekly. Older content does suffer from quality issues, but in fairness, you have to go pretty far back.

The quality of the videos is generally very good to excellant. HD videos are pretty stunning, even viewed on an Ipad. Camera work is fine for my tastes. This is an amateur studio and it is not a professional studio setting so if you are looking for the spiffy lighting effects and all that, you might be dissapointed. If you just want high-quality video feeds of action, you won't be dissapointed.

The composition of the XXX video action tends to be of the up-close and personal variety--not POV, but there is a large use of wide angle perspectives from relatively close distances. Camera movements are not frequent enough to be annoying, as can often happen with some directors. The are intros to the clips and an element of tease. The models don't jump right into the action.

The only gripe I have about the videos is that the directors and cameraman can sometimes go overboard with dialogue. You can often hear the cameraman giving directions or engaging the actors in what most would consider to be cheesy conversations. Background sounds can also sometimes be present.

DL Speeds are nothing to write home about. I have seen better and I have seen worse. There is definately room for improvement here, however.

As far as the still images, this is not what this site is really designed around, IMO, and is where it is lacking. There are plenty of galleries with loads of images. The actual content and compositions of the galleries is not all that bad. The actual quality of the images, however, can be just OK in a bright sunlight setting to terrible indoors. The site should shore this up and use equipment for stills that deals adequately with the noise present at high ISO settings.

Although I am using this as my primary video site, I wish they would offer more quality in terms of the photo galleries.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IMO, who would enjoy this site: Video fans, breast-lovers, and those who salivate over curvy women with a little bit of meat on their bones.

IMO, who won't enjoy this site: Those who prefer slim and petitie figures, prefer extreme hardcore action, or photo-hounds not interested in videos.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades(obviously subjective):

Amount of Content: B+
Video Image Quality: A
Video Composition: A-
Photo Image Quality: D
Photo Composition: C+
DL Speeds: C-
The Models: A
XXX Action: B

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Suggestions for improvement:

-- Pick up the DL speeds a bit.
-- More attention to photo quality. This site is excellant for high-quality videos. It would be an outstanding ste if the photos were up to the same standards.

As with any review, these are just my subjective opinions and YMMV.

Visit Big Tits Round Asses - View Replies - Add Reply

Brandi Love Review

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:50:41 PST

Brandi Love (0)

01-18-12 11:50pm

REVIEW = 59 by apilot (1)

Pros:
- She's very hot and a great hot-wife
- Great attitude and personality

Cons:
- Site is just crap. Navigation is bad and just Looks very cheesy.
- Thought I was joining a site, and it looks more like some kind of social networking/forum crap. Not interested in seeing uploaded photo's from some other members fat ugly cow wife..
- Video's are ok but not particularly compelling.
- Photo's are just screen sgrabs

Bottom Line:
I wish this site was better. I have been thinking of joining for a couple of years and was immediately disappointed.

Didn't know it was a members oriented site with lots of junk and posts from other members uploaded. Mostly fat unattractive women.

What I wanted was video/photos of a great hotiwfe brandi... what I got was disappointing...

Visit Brandi Love - View Replies - Add Reply

My Hot Wife Review

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 23:37:28 PST

My Hot Wife (1)

01-18-12 11:37pm

REVIEW = 69 by apilot (1)

Pros:
- Jackie is and has always been my ideal hotwife
- Pretty and sexy, great fun personality
- Good role play...

Cons:
- Lots of very old and low res content
- Web site organization and navigation is just a complete utter disaster
- Seems that quite a bit of content has been removed that used to be available.
- Not updated very often, sometimes the supposed updates are things I remember seeing several years ago. I'm not completely sure it is being updated with new content. sorta seems reject stuff from log ago dug up.
- Sometimes it can go a couple of months without even a token update. (i.e. small incremental update to existing post)
- The photography is not good. Lots of out of focus stuff posted.
- Forums are rarely if ever updated...

Bottom Line:
You know I used to love this site. And I've been subscribing on an off since about 1999. I want it to be good, since I love her. but I've just been very disappointed and cancel before the first month is up.

Jackie is Hot and sexy and by far my favorite hotwife out there. But the site blows and seems to have degraded quite a bit over the last few years...

Visit My Hot Wife - View Replies - Add Reply

Hardcore Youth Review

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 17:05:56 PST

Hardcore Youth (2)

01-18-12 05:05pm

REVIEW = 65 by joekramer08 (9)

Pros:
The scenes on hardcoreyouth.com are made by the same crew who makes scenes for firstanalquest.com and some other Euro teen sites. They have the same filming style, same sets, same actors, etc....so my review of this site will be essentially the same as my review of firstanalquest.com.

-As with a lot of these European sites, the best thing about this site are the gorgeous, young girls. Just about every girl on this site looks to be 18 or 19. If you're familiar with Euro teen porn, you'll recognize all the regular girls from that world.

-some good anal action if you like anal (about 45 percent of the scenes have anal).

-downloadable files are consistent and good quality WMV (960x540, 3129 kbps, 29 fps)

Cons:
-Like all of the scenes made by this group, the camera work is not great. They waste too much time on closeups and don't show the girl's whole body enough. Too often the camera will be zoomed in on just her face or just or vag. I find myself thinking "ZOOM OUT! SHOW HER WHOLE BODY!" I prefer camera work like that found in the scenes at tryteens.com - very zoomed out to show off the girl's whole body.

-small site. not many scenes, and not many updates

-Simplistic, outdated site design. Not as easy to navigate as some others

-they use mostly one male actor. I belive he is known as "Timo Hardy" in the industry. There is sometimes another male actor who looks similar to him. Unfortunately, Timo Hardy often can't keep his dick hard, and he is in a lot of the scenes.

Bottom Line:
I got access to Hardcore Youth as a bonus site included with tryteens.com.

Although hardcoreyouth.com is included as part of the Teen Core Club network, it is simply a bonus site and it is not run by the same people as the Teen Core Club. Hardcore Youth uses a different filming style than the scenes made by the Teen Core Club crew.

The Hardcore Youth scenes are made by the same crew who makes the scenes for firstanalquest.com, and some other European teen sites (I have seen some of the scenes from this crew on the Teen Mega World network as well). I have been looking at the Euro teen sites for a while now, and you can easily spot the scenes made by this crew based on the camera work and actors. As a result, the scenes on Hardcore Youth look exactly the same as their other scenes - for me that is a bad thing since I'm not a fan of their filming style (see my comments in "cons" section above).

The crew that does these scenes often uses the same male actor known as Timo Hardy. This guy seems to be the most frequently used male actor in Eastern European porn. I have seen him in a lot of scenes on various Eastern European networks. Unfortunately he can't get his dick hard very often. Google his name and you'll instantly recognize him if you're familiar with European teen porn. It seems Timo is in pretty much every scene filmed by this crew.

There are a few decent scenes on this site, but I would not pay just for this site alone. This site is intended to be just a "throw away" bonus site that you get when you join one of the main sites in the Teen Core Club network.

Visit Hardcore Youth - View Replies - Add Reply

HQ Upskirt Review

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 15:11:22 PST

HQ Upskirt (1)

01-18-12 03:11pm

REVIEW = 85 by mbaya (344)

Pros:
-Choice of billing companies. Available choices are CCBill, Segpay and Zombaio.
-True high definition videos at 1280x720.
-Works with download managers. Downloads were fast as the file sizes are under 100MB for at most five minutes.
-No download limits.
-New videos every day and recently a new set of around 30 photos are also being posted daily. As of today there are 239 videos and 1439 photos.
-Mostly very attractive women with nice legs. Even the paid models seem very natural and not glam. The feeling you get is that you may see these women in the street.
-The site offers a way to communicate with other members, invite a friend, create a profile and upload your own videos and photos. Nice features that so far are not being used.

Cons:
-Only one download choice, MP4. Maybe it is my computer, but I have trouble with that type of file. I converted the videos to AVI using AVI Media Converter.
-The photos do not have the option of being zipdownloaded.
-The most recent photos are only 1200x800. Not quality in todays porn.
-Practically no variety in the models. Nearly every one is white, thin and in their early 20s.
-Very softcore. Until recently the most you would see is a view of panties under a skirt.

Bottom Line:
This site has changed its focus over the nine months it has been online. The oldest videos show a cameraman following women on the streets around town. At some point he gets a camera into position close to the model and gets film of what the woman is wearing underneath. The feeling that comes across is of an invasion of privacy on unknowing women. I feel that the issue of consent is important and these scenes made me feel a bit uncomfortable. How the cameraman kept from getting hit by his victims or even arrested is a mystery. If these scenes were staged, they did a really good job of making them seem unscripted and unrehearsed.

Most scenes were filmed in Russia, as you can clearly see writing in their alphabet. Some scenes were filmed in Guatemala as well. I suspect they were filmed for another site as they often have watermarks for Spyguate, a name I don't recognize. The photos from this time are similar in theme and style.

More recently, there is a distinct change in style. Professional, non glam Russian models play up to the camera in unabashed exhibitionism. The models are attractive and create a good sexy show. There is some nudity, a lot of tease, making nice videos that make me want to watch them over and over. There is a pleasing balance of whole body and closeups. Many of the models have multiple videos, with different levels of tease and different locales.

The photo sets also have been featuring professionals in scenes that can only be described as exhibitionist. There is a feeling of sexiness, even in photos that are not totally nude.

My overall impression is of a site that has found its place as tease, with some partial nudity. The sexiness is undeniable. With daily updates, and a winning formula, I can see myself resubscribing.

Visit HQ Upskirt - View Replies - Add Reply

Just Nips Review

Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:48:45 PST

Just Nips (1)

01-18-12 09:48am

REVIEW = 75 by Capn (27)

Pros:
+ Over 500 amateur models featured.
They do mean amateur too. There is everything here from petite boyish to BBW, barely legal to mature, stunningly pretty, through 'next door' to downright scary!

+ Models seem to enjoy themselves. Always a plus to me.
The Webmaster seems to be directly involved in the shooting & whilst encouraging going to full body nudity, does not press the models to do anything they are not comfortable with.
The flip side of this is that he doesn't stop them if they are enjoying themselves. ;)
+ The models are treated with respect
+ Full strips to nude appears to be the norm, sometimes a variety of outfits are featured(..briefly).
+ Zips available
+ HD Video available.
Not being a video guy I really can't give a view on this other than they look OK to me.
+ Site is nicely presented & functional, especially so given this is not a big budget operation.
+ Friendly & communicative Webmaster, who also does the photography.
+ Comprehensive FAQ page

Cons:
-Some info. seems fragmented & conflicts. At writing, the header on the Amateur page says 44985 pics/651 videos/402 Amateurs. Very out of date. Same page lower down 581 Sessions 76337 Images 2237 Videos. No mention of the currently 517 models.
-Sets seem rushed, there are very few fully clothed shots, often even the fleeting one or two often are not full body shots. It would be nice to to have ten or a dozen or so fully clothed shots before the stripping just to assess & build up anticipation.
-When the model has come with a variety of outfits, there is very little material featured of each. That rushed feeling again.
-Not a lot of material of each model available. A few return for another shoot, but not many. The studio location is something to do with that. Thumbnails crop the full image. Sometimes a vert. format thumbnail hides a hor. format shot.
-Only 1 pic res. available typ.1200x800
-Zip files need renaming, they come with a sequential number only.
-Barely any model bio

Bottom Line:
Well, owing to a neat trial deal I took the plunge & thought I would share my findings.

Updates are 2 - 3 a week.
Split between photoset & video is roughly 50/50

Possibly because of the specific naming & targetting of this site it had slipped under my radar. Whilst the material is almost exclusively softcore, it features quite a bit more than the just topless material the site naming implies.
I am pleased I tried it, because it is pretty much on topic for my FC2N fetish! ;)
( Fully clothed to nude...An acronym coined by my friend Auxilia )

For me, the style needs to be expanded. Specifically, the rushed feeling needs to be addressed.
The Webmaster is aware of it and has lengthened the shoots from 1 hour to 3 IIRC
I do feel, the uploaded sets still need editing more benignly though, as I mentioned above.
As it stands there are only a few shots in each set which hit the spot for me.
They are there, in ones & twos but I just need a lot more of that style in each set.

If you are looking for anything other than solo softcore then really this site is not for you.
If however, you like me, like seeing geniune amateurs strip naked....it is certainly worth a punt.

I should also mention that some of the models featured are in advanced stages of pregnancy, in some cases I quite like that, but know others don't.

It is so near.
Another nearly, but not quite for me.

In case you didn't realise, both the pros & cons would have been longer but in both cases I ran out of space! :0(

Visit Just Nips - View Replies - Add Reply

Bangbros Network Review

Tue, 17 Jan 2012 16:42:50 PST

Bangbros Network (5)

01-17-12 04:42pm

REVIEW = 79 by BubbaGump (12)

Pros:
-- A large amount of content.
-- Easy site navigation
-- Diverse sub-site niches.
-- Decent video work for an amateur studio.
-- Very sexy amateur models with varying body types.

Cons:
-- Terrible photo image quality--lots of noise and color issues.
-- DL Speeds seem to be a bit lacking.
-- Older videos can drop off in quality.
-- There is often small-talk or audible directing in videos.
-- Did I mention they could use a proper camera for stills?

Bottom Line:
Background:

My erotic interests: I am a breast guy. Curvy Women, Slim-and-Stacked or Voluptuous, Natural Women, MILF, Shapely Behinds.

I am primarily a photo guy, as well. I enjoy streaming videos but my primary taste in erotica is photography. I also travel quite frequently, so much of my viewing takes place on an Ipad, after transfer of data. Keep this in mind here.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Good:

I decided to try BangBros as I have rented some of their videos in the past and enjoyed their work. Although I primarily prefer photos, I do enjoy their video presentations more than most of the stuff I have come accross out there in pornland. Part of this is due to the models themselves--pretty, natural amateurs from young amateur girls of college-age all the way to chesty MILF. I also really like the video work. It is down-to-Eqarth and they don't go overboard with lighting or other elements you find in the professional studios. There are intros to the videos and a bit of an element of tease to many presentations. They don't jump right into the action.

I found the site navigation to be very easy and straightorward. As far as content, the site should appeal to many interests and fills a number of niches. The subsites include subjects such as handjobs, feet, breasts, buns, latin, afro--a lot of bases are covered. The women also are generaly very beautiful, amateur models. There are few of the plastic runway model-types with softball shaped implants. The theme here trends towards shapely, natural beauty. BangBros has some of the best natural, amateur models I have come accross.

The Bad:

DL Speeds are a bit hit-or-miss.I never timed-out but there were periods where things slowed to a crawl.

As far as video content, there are a number of things to be annoyed with. The audio feeds often contain annoying noises and sounds such as dropped equipment, active vocal directions to the models, and general small-talk that can border on the rediculous. I understand that this is an amaetur studio and not a Hollywood production set with a soundstage. However, more care could be used in this regards, IMO.

The Ugly:

It is obvious from the image quality that the photographer is either using a cheap digital camera or using the video recorder itself to take stills. Images seem to unviersally suffer from white balance issues, purple fringing, and noise is often prevalent. The truth is, I could get better quality by taking images with my IPhone. The actual compsoitions are not terrible, just often repetitive and it is obvious by the style that they were composed by a videopgrapher, not a photographer.

Dedicated SLR kits are not terribly expensive these days--Hint, Hint. Please go down to Best Buy or Target and get something on sale from last year's discount bin. Even with the cheapo plastic lenses that come with the kit, you will find the produced image quality is light-years ahead of what is currently available in the image galleries.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With all that being said, I do enjoy the videos and although I prefer still images to video, I plan on sticking around for a while and making this my dedicated video site. I have always enjoyed BangBros videos.

As a video site, I wouldn't hesitate to reccomend it. If you are going there for the photos, you can do a lot better and my advice is look elsewhere.

As with all opinions, just my two cents.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Grades:

Quantity of Material: A
Site Navigation: A
Video Quality: A
Video Compositions: A
Photo Image Quality: D-
Photo Compositions: C
DL Speed: C-
The Models: A
The XXX Action: B+

Visit Bangbros Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Smack My Bitch Review

Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:52:39 PST

Smack My Bitch (2)

01-17-12 10:52am

REVIEW = 80 by coilcell (1)

Pros:
Good looking site, easy navigation for me. quality videos.

Cons:
IT'S A CLONE SITE!!! You can get all the same videos and a hole lot more at TEEN MEGA WORLD

Bottom Line:
I'm a current member at Teen Mega World and have been for over six months. When i joined that site, I didn't know they were all the same movies as Teen Mega World. Better choice would be to enter Teen Mega World, A hole lot of more videos, and just as good quality.

Visit Smack My Bitch - View Replies - Add Reply

VideoBox Review

Tue, 17 Jan 2012 08:44:35 PST

VideoBox (11)

01-17-12 08:44am

REVIEW = 99 by Ken3123 (0)

Pros:
Huge amount of porn; Organize fav. scenes/movies/porn stars; Custom download is the best option because you don't have to download the whole scene; Able to play WMV scenes on your xbox 360.

Cons:
Confusing navigation for the new members; Unable to play MP4 scenes on your xbox 360; Paying an extra fee for scenes from Evil Angel or Vivid

Bottom Line:
This is an excellent website to download scenes from more than 100 DVDs. Custom download is a breath of fresh air. Unfortunately, if u are new, u might get confused at first and u can't play MP4 scenes on your Xbox 360. Overall, 15 bucks is the perfect price compared to more than 30 when u rent and burn the DVDs from the video store. U won't regret it.

Visit VideoBox - View Replies - Add Reply