PU - New Reviews

Teasers VOD Review

Mon, 15 Mar 2010 06:27:57 PDT

Teasers VOD (1)

03-15-10 06:27am

REVIEW = 75 by mbaya (276)

Pros:
-Bill through Epoch.
-Nice quality videos. Not HD though.
-Very attractive models. However, many have tattoos and/or are victims of badly done boob jobs.
-No download limits.

Cons:
-No photos.
-Too much masturbation and not enough teasing.
-Small archive and only three updates per month. Needs serious growth for the price to make sense.
-Cannot use Freedownloadmanager.
-Links break constantly. Without a download manager, you must continuously watch out for redownloading incomplete videos.

Bottom Line:
This site bills itself as "porn valleys premier public nudity website", as well as the "winner of best paysite of 2009 at GramPonante.com." I wouldn't go that far in my praise of the site. It features public nudity, with a major focus on masturbation, using fingers not toys.

One of the first things I noticed is that the site is just too small to justify the price. At nearly $30, other sites at that price are considerably larger. With just three updates a month, it hardly is worth a second month's membership. Even worse some updates are boring behind the scenes videos.

What you do get are high quality videos featuring minor porn stars and a few amateurs. Across the board, they are attractive. However you also get tattoos and fake boobs on a large number of them.

The scenes are broken down into several sections that are downloaded only individually. You should be able to download every scene all at once for each model. The first section is an interview scene at an outdoor cafe. Ok if you want to hear the models talk, but any visuals are very brief. The models flash under the table or flash their boobs very quickly. You also get scenes of upskirt, bikini, secluded locations, and indoor masturbation scenes called bonus. The upskirt scenes are the only really hot scenes that feature exhibitionism. The others focus on masturbation. The bikini scenes are so weak that I don't know why they are even on the site. Many of the individual scenes are split into parts that cannot be downloaded all at once.

Although the video quality is much better here, I wish the scenes were more like those at publicflash.com. Those were real teasing, flashing and fun. These scenes give me the feeling of pros getting paid, with no excitement about doing the forbidden. You can easily see that they are in this just for the cash.

There are no photos on the site. However, there is a photographer in every scene clicking away. It can get most annoying as I want to see the model, not the back of the head of some guy. In some scenes they even direct the model on how to pose. I am truly baffled what happens to the photos they take.

The site is good if you like masturbation more than I do. Its really not that bad, just disappointing.

Visit Teasers VOD - View Replies - Add Reply

Porn.com Review

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:55:56 PDT

Porn.com (4)

03-14-10 07:55pm

REVIEW = 65 by mikebarrx (1)

Pros:
* Cheap
* Easy Search
* Nice library
* Decent download speeds

Cons:
* Loaded with errors
* Need to autoplay a video before downloading
* Awful navigation, often slow
* Frustrating to use at times

Bottom Line:
Yes, its cheap. Yes, you can search easy. Yes, there is a decent library, some even exclusive.

Sadly, the site feels like it was built in 1998. Coming over from VideoBox, maybe I was just spoiled? VB nay be the gold standard for navigation and clip downloads, but Porn.com isn't even iron.

First off, why do I need to start viewing a clip in order to download it? If I click a link, I'd like single click downloads.

Second, how come when I click the WMV download link, more times than not the MOV link comes up? I cancel, and re-try. Most times it works, sometimes I need 3 tries.

Third, how hard is it to give accurate file sizes for download? I am not talking about being a MB or two off, either... they say 150 MB, it is 75 or 225. Its crazy!

The site is so frustrating that I don't even use it. I canceled a week in (I had to look HARD for that link) and barely check it. Dollar for dollar, VB blows this away. I wouldn't recommend.

Visit Porn.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Fucked Hard 18 Review

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 19:35:32 PDT

Fucked Hard 18 (3)

03-14-10 07:35pm

REVIEW = 93 by Goldfish (39)

Pros:
+ Stunning models. Euro girls watch out! CA is catching up on you.
+ Great navigation features. Can use calendar to browse by date posted or browse by girl.
+ Good live sex cam page.
+ Weekly content updates
+ Great quality, near HD vids
+ Good quality Flash videos if you choose to watch online.

Cons:
- Scenes somewhat repetitive.
- It would be nice to see some ethnic variety in the girls. (All white)

Bottom Line:
Wow! Lately I've been feeling like I've seen it all and there is nothing new or exciting out there in the online porn world and then this site comes along and knocks my socks off!

I usually judge a site on how many videos I download and keep. This site comes as close to 100% keep as I've come with any site in recent memory. Really hot, oiled up women being massaged and then fucked. How can you beat that? I did delete a few clips just because the girls were only beautiful versus stunningly beautiful or the scene was hot but not super hot.

My only minor complaint is the video scenes are a bit repetitive. The guy gives the same interview and even seems to repeat the same sexual positions with each girl.

Over all a great site -- loved it!

Visit Fucked Hard 18 - View Replies - Add Reply

Smack My Bitch Review

Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:57:38 PDT

Smack My Bitch (1)

03-14-10 09:57am

REVIEW = 84 by pat362 (79)

Pros:
-Over 200 videos.
-All videos are HD 1280x720.
-They have some of the most beautiful up and coming Russian teen pornstars.
-The main theme is teens and anal sex.
-Updates come regularly and are dated.
-Navigation is simple
-There is dialogue in some of the scenes.
-They offer some description for the action in each scene.
-Some of the scenes involve schoolgirl uniforms.

Cons:
-Most girls are not exclusive to this site so you may have seen them doing similar things on other sites.
-Like similar sites in Europe. The girls name may be different than what you know her under.
-This is mainly a video site. They do have photosets but sometimes only screenshots.
-Only one download option for videoss
-Download speed is a little slow but then again the videos are HD.
-This is still pretty much a gonzo style site so no major premise.
-Some of the content may not be exclusive.
-Older content does not have a description.

Bottom Line:
I joined this site because they had some rare anal scenes of my favorite Russian stars and the price of 30$ was good. They have some dialogue but it's sometimes in Russian, which I don't understand but frankly I prefer that to none at all. They have a good selection of cute teens and the scene location, decor and choice of clothes emphasises that teen aspect.

If you like good looking teen girls having anal sex then you will be satisfied.

I'm not sure how I found this but this is the link to the studio where the webmaster buys his content. As far as I can tell, most of theses girls and scenes are or will be found on smack mybitch.com: http://adultlabs.com/new_faces.php

TBP says that the site has been up since January 2010 but the content goes back to May of last year. All I know is that I only started keeping track of it recently.

Visit Smack My Bitch - View Replies - Add Reply

Just Nude Review

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 08:39:36 PST

Just Nude (1)

03-12-10 08:39am

REVIEW = 84 by tangub (4)

Pros:
Good sized collection of photos
Most galleries come in 3 different resolutions with zip download for each
Updated with a new gallery every 2 to 3 days
Photos look natural with no obvious signs of air brushing
3 different video download options
$9.95 3 day trial gives you access to all the content but not in the highest resolution

Cons:
Small collection of videos
Full access price of $29.95 for first month too expensive for the amount of content
No new video updates in the last 6 months
Videos boring
Very little model info
CC Bill don�t accept visa

Bottom Line:
Here you will find a nice collection of mostly Russian and Ukrainian models shot mostly in outdoors settings with the majority of shoots just being plain nudes, very little in the way of sexy outfits or lingerie here so not much tease factor. To date you will find 137 different models and a total of 614 photo galleries so quite a good sized archive. Photos usually come in 3 sizes, 800, 1600 and 3000px plus which can be anything up to 5616 x 3744 with a zip download for each. As my preferred choice was the 1600px due to file size and H/D space I decided to just opt for the 3 day trial here and I was able to download the entire collection in a day or so which came to just under 12 GB so no obvious d/l limits here. I was forced to sign up with segpay as ccbill don�t accept visa here but seems ok, cancelled the same day without any problems and no unexpected charges so far.

There are several ways to browse the site. Galleries takes you to the photo galleries from the latest update back to January 09, Models page lets you browse the models in alphabetical order or by rating and clicking on any model will give you all her galleries and videos. You also have the opportunity to rate every model and gallery.
Best Galleries takes you to the top 100 galleries by rating and Photographers allows you to browse all the galleries shot by a certain photographer if you like the particular style of one, the biggest contributor here is Russian photographer Alexander Federov with 244 galleries. Archives takes you to the galleries from 2008 back to Oct 2005. There is also a very basic search function which allows you to search models by hair colour and breast size and not much else and a section where you can leave comments.

The videos come in 3 options, WMV 1280 x 720 5000 kb/s, AVI 720 x 400 1300 kb/s and ipod 320x180 384 kb/s. The total number of videos on the site is 22 with the last update being 22 September 09 and before that 19 July so you certainly wouldn�t want to stick around waiting for updates there. The couple I watched in 1300 res looked good but were so boring I nearly fell asleep.

Overall I enjoyed the nice collection of skinny natural looking Russian teen type models here and would certainly recommend the 3 day trial for photo fans if you�re happy with the medium res pics but I think the $30 full months price is too expensive for the amount of content compared to sites like MET or Femjoy.

Visit Just Nude - View Replies - Add Reply

All Reality Pass Review

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:25:47 PST

All Reality Pass (3)

03-12-10 06:25am

REVIEW = 50 by Bluesurfer (0)

Pros:
Many Sites with many Clips > 2k

Cons:
Many Downloads not function.
Very low low low Video Quality.
The most clips have Sizes under 200 MB for 30-40 Minutes.
You can 6 CLips download for a day. If a download
broken - shit happend - and you have only 5 Clips.
It�s a very poor Site :-(

Bottom Line:
I�ll never come back....

Visit All Reality Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

BF Collection Review

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:57:43 PST

BF Collection (0)

03-12-10 02:57am

REVIEW = 80 by sparko (0)

Pros:
Sexy boys and some memorable material in the archives.

Cons:
New content is not up to scratch.

Bottom Line:
I have regularly been a member of this site for over ten years. When I was the age of these boys I even found it possible to have crushes on them. Many of the boys in the archive are the beautiful down to earth kind you see in the pub and think about for days, and they really want to show you their goods. These videos were also shot with care and attention and respect for the beauty of the models, and capturing some of the juiciest orgasms I have ever seen. There was a time when there was nothing else on the internet I would have preferred to look at. Unfortunately the golden era of this site is over. The boys just aren't worth looking at anymore, I could get boys like this every night if I wanted to, and the photographers know that the boys are boring. I usually feel like I'm not getting a decent look at the cock, and to be honest what I'm really paying for is to get a good look at hot cock. And the reviewer here is correct that the quality of the videos has slipped behind the general standard of internet porn. They have also started playing really revolting music over their videos and it seems like they are thinking of getting rid of the broken-up video format where you could just download his cum or more if you really liked him. I think they are either trading off what they had, or they are simply losing it. If you've seen the archive, spend your money elsewhere.

Visit BF Collection - View Replies - Add Reply

Make Teen Gape Review

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:53:44 PST

Make Teen Gape (1)

03-11-10 06:53am

REVIEW = 69 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
Cute natural looking teens engaged in hard anal and sometimes quite brutal deep throat action.

Reasonable quality videos, a mix of 640x480 (Full screen) and 960x540 (Widescreen) at an average bitrate of 3 mbit/sec. Each scene is an average of 30 mins long.

Well lit and professional looking photos accompany each scene, usually around 600 per set.

No regional pricing, DRM, download limits or slow speeds.

No messing about, scene starts and within a minute the guy is balls deep in the models mouth.

Cons:
Color on the videos seems very dull and lacking in contrast.

Pictures are quite low res (1280 x 860) and can sometimes have runs of 10 - 20 pictures that are almost identical with only very slight movement from the last. Also the picture sets are not zipped.

Poor value for money (15 scenes for $30 per month membership)

Although this is a new site, it seems like the content maybe up to 2 years old. Either that or the models haven't aged a day since doing their scenes for the other network sites (doubleteamedteens.com, assteenmouth.com)

Bottom Line:
It is impossible to recommend the site as ALL of the models can be seen doing almost identical scenes on the other network sites. For example AssTeenMouth features the exact same models, actors, sets, director, scene content, stupid stuffed animals and also costs the same 30$ to join but has 5 times the content. There is really no reason for this site to even exist. Why these scenes were placed on a new site and not on one of the other more established sites is beyond me.

I do like the content but it is just far too similar in both action and style to the stuff I downloaded over a year ago from other TeenCore sites. The site just fails to define its own identity and seems like just an excuse to get rid of some old videos and make you cough up 30$ for the privilege.

Visit Make Teen Gape - View Replies - Add Reply

50Plus MILFs Review

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:34:04 PST

50Plus MILFs (0)

03-11-10 06:34am

REVIEW = 80 by Darrow (0)

Pros:
I really like Milf sites. However when I go to Milf sites, I see a lot of women who are clearly in their late 20's and early 30's and I really hate that because they are not really Milfs.

You don't have the issue with 50+ Milfs. They are all 50+ and most of them are quite attractive 50+ milfs. All of them are doing hardcore and many of them do anal.

The updates are weekly; the site has a good number of videos.

Some of the models are exclusive to the score group.

Cons:
Being a Mac user I prefer MP4's and MOV files. They have them, but they are the inferior quality files.

The navigation could be a little better, but it is O.K. for now.

Bottom Line:
Possibly the best hardcore milf site out there. Well worth the purchase price and worth staying for awhile.

Visit 50Plus MILFs - View Replies - Add Reply

Anabolic.com Review

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:24:29 PST

Anabolic.com (1)

03-11-10 06:24am

REVIEW = 65 by Darrow (0)

Pros:
They have videos and they can be streamed and/or downloaded.

Cons:
Lots of them.

1) Poor quality videos (I ended up not saving any)
2) Poor quality streaming.
3) Deceptively small site; the ads make it look like it has a lot of anabolic vids. Instead it doesn't.
4) Really bad navigation. Since the site was so small, it wasn't a real pain.

Bottom Line:
Don't go for the monthly. If at all, stick with the 5.99 trial and then cancel.

Visit Anabolic.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Fucking Gamble Review

Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:14:38 PST

Fucking Gamble (4)

03-11-10 01:14am

REVIEW = 91 by silver (41)

Pros:
+ All exclusive content
+ Updates come often (about 10-12 times a month)
+ Some models are very attractive
+ WMV, MP4 video formats
+ Lots of nice hardcore action in FG films. Nothing to brutal. They aim to show people how to have fun during sex.
+ Some games were shot outdoors in very beautiful places
+ They currently have more than 1500 different "action cards"
+ Nice video size (996x664 large size)
+ Real girls with real unscripted actions
+ Online game emulator
+ Ability to play the same swinger game for real with your friends
+ Trial Membership allows to access all the features and all the content of the site
+ Kinda "Web 2.0" adult site

Cons:
- Most of the games are spoken in Hungarian and although such films contain English subtitles � it is uncomfortable for English-speaking users
- Pics quality is limited
- Some colour rendering problems in 2 vids (game 4, game 27)

Bottom Line:
Fucking Gamble is the site that proud to keep the games as real as possible. They call this "ultra-reality". Only first few seconds showing players' arrival to the scene are scripted. Starting from the moment when the game begins, it is played for real, utilizing a high degree of improvisational skills and imagination, without any scripts.

They have an extremely interactive site and encourage me not only to enjoy the content, but to participate in site life too. There are forums where everyone can express your opinion and places to discuss your favorite models and your favorite games, which will be taken into account for the future game shootings.

While Trial Membership allows to access all the features and all the content of the site, it limits an amount of content allowed for download. Currently download limit for a 3-day trial is set to 6G. They issue updates to the site about 10-12 times a month, with each update having approximately 30 minutes of action. All the updates are available in a multitude of video formats.

Currently they provide 7 different versions of WMV files (from 100kBit/s to 6MBit/s), which vary in quality and size/bandwidth, 7 different versions of MP4 files in the same bandwidths as WMV, and 2 special versions for iPods (one for iPod Classic/nano and another one for iPod Touch/iPhone). It totals to 16 different download options for the same content.

Fucking Gamble is a neat idea for a site and I always like to see a site that tries something a little bit different. The site is lots of fun, certainly, and I think lots of people will like this non-serious approach to naughty content.

Visit Fucking Gamble - View Replies - Add Reply

Cream Pimps Review

Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:36:43 PST

Cream Pimps (1)

03-10-10 01:36pm

REVIEW = 66 by james4096 (112)

Pros:
- Videos appear to be exclusive.
- Access to network of 10 sites
- No DRM or download limit
- They do a good job delivering on the "creampie" niche.
- Even the shemale site is condomless with actual creampies.

Cons:
- The full length vids are poor quality. Only the split clips are offered in 1280x720
- no zips for photosets
- Only one format for videos, wmv
- very pricey site at almost $40
- Does not use a reputable biller
- Not a very big site either. Only around 220 videos.

Bottom Line:
Cream Pimps is a network that caters to creampies. If you don't know that is just an internal cumshot. I can dig that. You don't have to watch the guy furiously jerking himself off for the last 5 minutes of the film and shooting a load on the girls tits. The scenes are pretty good and feature real creampies, sometimes anal ones. The women are mostly all known pornstars and the shemales are your Brazilian TS stars.

The network consists of 10 sites. Here's a listing along with the number of scenes:

Black Booty Cream - 26
Black Cream White Ass - 19
Porn Star Cream - 17
Transsexual Cream - 28
Big Butt Cream - 32
Boobies and Cream - 19
Cuckold Cream - 22
Teens First Blow Job - 14 *this one isn't a creampie site, and it's not updated
Teens First Cream - 26
Cougars and Cream - 18

The content for each site is pretty much what the names imply.

The major problem with this site is the videos. There are high, medium and low wmv files split in to shorter clips for download and stream. There is also one quality for the full scene downloads, but it isn't very good (512x288 1mbps).

As I mentioned in the cons there are no zips for the photosets. The images are 1280x900ish.

They update the network 4 or 5 times a week. That's acceptable, but I think networks should do daily updates these days.

The scenes are decent and stick to the niche, but there are just not enough for the high price tag and they don't have full length HD vids. If they would give HD full scene vids and lower the price I'd give this site much a much higher score. Don't join this site.

Visit Cream Pimps - View Replies - Add Reply

Brazilian Transsexuals Review

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:21:47 PST

Brazilian Transsexuals (1)

03-09-10 04:21pm

REVIEW = 88 by GCode (79)

Pros:
- Exclusive content of Brazilian TS models in mostly solo masturbation content but quite a lot of hardcore as well.
- Updates once a week on one day with 4 seperate model updates with each including a photo and video set. Plus, 2 videos are remastered as well.
- No DRM.
- Newest videos have a few options with the highest being at ~1280 X 720, 3,500 kbps. Other options are available. Streaming is available for recent updates in 2010 only. Drop in quality and less options as you get older in year, around 2006 and lower.
- Photos are all available via zip and newest ones are at ~1280 X 850 with a non-intrusive watermark.
- Navigation is solid with plenty of features like accurate searches, user tags, comments, blogs, FAQ, and 'my portfolio section'.
- Coming soon section with model previews.
- Rating system for models as well as sets to check out what others think is hot.
- There are some brief comments in models' profiles which can give some insight or facts.

Cons:
- I got slow download speeds but cust service attempted to help at least.
- High price if you are not using ticket system.
- A slight con but really can't be helped is the drop in quality as you get lower in year. This is expected but at least they are remastering old videos which I don't think any other grooby site is doing.
- Some of the cumshot footage in solo scenes are taken from hardcore scenes either shot previously or for future updates. Sometimes, the footage is never put up but it's obviously not from that exact solo scene.
- Photos are lower in resolution for such a site that is considered in the upper echelon of TS sites.
- Some may dislike the fact the site updates once a week with all updates because they may miss out on a few updates if their membership expires.
- Some videographers do a little more chit chatting than others with the models which is usually not direction but just pointless comments about how hot or sexy a model is. Just uncalled for in my opinion.

Bottom Line:
Brazilian Transsexuals really surprised me from Grooby. After using their ticket system and joining a lot of their sites, I really thought this one stood out the most. I'm actually surprised this one seems to be the sleeper when compared to all of their sites but I liked it the most. While many will see the same models they have seen on so many other South American TS sites, there was also a lot of new fresh ones I've never seen. Plus, there is A LOT of content which seems to be a great trend from most Grooby sites in general.

The videos are mostly solo masturbation footage but this site tends to focus a lot more on the cumshot than most Grooby sites. Therefore, you are usually get more than one video from a model with this shown but some are left out (if they ever existed). A great addition to the site is a lot of videographers use different camera angles when capturing the cumshot, giving a wide vary of footage including close-ups, full body shots, and medium shots of the same cumshot in one video. Most videos do involve a striptease and toyplay but most all end in a cumshot. Also, the site emphasizes on hardcore footage a bit more than most of the Grooby sites that are not actual sites with only hardcore. Plus, most of this footage can range from B/TS, TS/TS, G/TS, and threesomes or more. Therefore, there is a wide array of content that should keep everyone happy. However, plenty of the videos may have chitter chatter amongst the cameraman and models. Although, this unfortunantly is mostly from the camera man telling the model how sexy she is or whatever. I just always believe this is a no-no because it seems like it becomes the videographers own personal sex video instead of producing porn for the masses. But, overall, the majority of the videos are extremely well done and crisp; sometimes even innovative.

The photography is done great as well. While my quirk is that the resolution could be higher, the actual photography is well done. The photos are crisp, well lighted, average to great settings, and change frame to frame enough with no a lot of repeats. There are plenty of different positions with ass shots, tit shots, close-ups, and/or full body shots. Overall, these are well done but I'd expect a boost in the res department if they want to be put in the 90's.

This site is extremely well done. You know what you are getting and that is mostly quality. The customer service seems to care with attempts at finding the problem with the slow download speeds. While the issue was never resolved, I cannot say if anyone else will experience slow download speeds from the site. However, the only thing holding me back from giving this site a score in the 90's is the slow download speeds, an expensive monthly price, the chit chat in some videos, and the lower resolution for photos. Other than that, this site has it all. A great site design, awesome navigation, popular models, hot and sexy on camera footage, a large archive, and cool features.

Visit Brazilian Transsexuals - View Replies - Add Reply

TAC Amateurs Review

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:52:33 PST

TAC Amateurs (1)

03-09-10 10:52am

REVIEW = 70 by bacardiancoke (18)

Pros:
- Fairly extensive range of content
- Good cross section of different women
- No DRM
- Good d/l speed

Cons:
- Navigation
- Network design
- Range of recent content

Bottom Line:
TAC, is a network of amateur porn stars. Basically women who could live next door to you who upload their own content.

As such you can find different and at times refreshing content in different situations ranging from cute sets up to bukkake gangbangs.

But (and this you'll know if you read other reviews of mine) I'm heading rapidly to my biggest set of bugbears with amateur portals and many porn sites in general.

The webmasters at TAC are sorely letting the side down. They appear to be afflicted by the same level of laziness or apathy that is sweeping through porn sites 3yr old+ across the whole of cyberspace.

The design is tired, navigation is infuriating thanks to quite possibly the worst breakdown of categories that I have ever seen, no tags or a search function!!!! That's abysmal.

The individual sites vary in quality according to age and willing of the models so I'll not get too bogged down with content and instead stick with the appeal of the network and management.

There are very few updates for a network style of site, this is because I can find very few newer models. And I think I know why; and it points straight back to the design and implementation of the main portal.

If me and my wife were to launch a swing site we'd probably want to shelter of a network such as TAC as we are no webmasters by any stretch of the imagination.

But we wouldn't in a million years choose TAC to host our content. It looks neglected, disinterested and don't feel that we would be able to promote our work enough.

MANAGERS OF TAC, hear your public speak! Until you modernise your portal you are stopping content providers from signing up and keeping your revenue down. You have the potential of a great network, but not until you get your arses in gear and breathe life back into your project.

Visit TAC Amateurs - View Replies - Add Reply

Femanic Review

Tue, 09 Mar 2010 07:59:24 PST

Femanic (1)

03-09-10 07:59am

REVIEW = 70 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
If this were a normal porn site I would think the models are very attractive, the thing that makes this site so amazing is that these beautiful women do the nastiest things.

Content is great for those that are into this sort of fetish. Pissing, food play and puking are the main themes.

Membership includes access to their sister site. As the site is not listed here and the content is controversial I won't mention it in this review. I have listed it as a pro because it doubles the amount of content available.

The technical aspect of the content is pretty good but not normally HD. There are 1 or 2 720P MP4's on the site but they are not regularly updating in HD although the quality of the 480P videos is still good.

Cons:
Download limits. Having a limit per 24 hours is bad enough but also having an hourly limit makes it a real chore to download the content.

Updates used to be a full scene once or twice a week. Recently a update counts as a 5 minute clip from a scene. They are usually posting clips from several scenes at once so it can take weeks for a full scene to be available.

Older content is not only poor quality technically (looks like it was transferred from VHS) but also very old. Some of the scenes are from the mid 90's and haven't aged at all well.

Scenes are not accompanied by photo sets.

In some of the scenes the ladies seem to have downed a couple of bottles of vodka beforehand, I don't know why but that makes me feel kind of uneasy.

Bottom Line:
There are 2 things that would instantly get this site a score of 80 from me:

1. Get rid of the download limits.
2. Update complete scenes

The (newer) content itself is excellent, I don't know of any other sites that have this sort of quality of women pissing and throwing up over each other, it's like a car crash, you know you shouldn't look but something makes you anyway :)

If this is the sort of content you are into it is worth a membership but beware, beware, beware the download limits.

Did I mention the download limits??!?!!?

Visit Femanic - View Replies - Add Reply

Lost Bets Games Review

Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:44:35 PST

Lost Bets Games (2)

03-08-10 09:44pm

REVIEW = 66 by silver (41)

Pros:
+ Girls are not typical pornstars that I see everywhere, they are my average everyday next door girls
+ Vids are exclusive only to this site
+ Updates come often (about 4 times a month)
+ WMV, MP4 video formats
+ No DRM videos protection
+ Decent site design
+ They claimed unscripted action

Cons:
- The actions are very softcore
- Girls look natural but a bit ugly
- I think 320x240 is a poor (not a medium) quality today

Bottom Line:
Lost Bets Games is a porn site based on fun and hot concept � it shows a lot of ladies playing different games (with each other as well as with men) and performing various tasks. The �punishment� range from stripping and doing a few nude acrobatics, all the way to performing a sex act in front of our camera. These girls are not your typical pornstars that you see everywhere, they are your average everyday next door girls. The videos are available in WMV and MP4 formats, displaying at a best of 640x480 (for MP4), they have a bitrate of around 1400kbps. None of the videos have any DRM restrictions and there are currently updates being at least once per week. Update information was pretty good here and they tell you the date of the next update but viewing options weren�t especially numerous. The design wasn�t the best you�ll ever see but it was still reasonably well presented.

Recommended if you like watching girls playing and losing strip games. If you like watching real people allowing Fortune to decide their fates, playing real games, doing real things�

Visit Lost Bets Games - View Replies - Add Reply

Boob Exam Scam Review

Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:57:29 PST

Boob Exam Scam (1)

03-08-10 11:57am

REVIEW = 92 by shooterbo (6)

Pros:
..Site has developed its material substantially, and now has one of the most erotic presentations in the business. The girls are genuine, and love what is taking place, despite their initial reaction to the ploy.
..Downloads available, high def is pretty much standard.
..Vid quality is pristine and camera work is customer-oriented.
..There have been a couple of episodes involving a female nurse of late, and one of them is absolutely the most erotic 3-way ffm you will ever find.
..Updates are frequent, and the parent, Pink Visual, is super consumer oriented.

Cons:
More ffm will be welcome, but they appear to already be headed that way.

Bottom Line:
Just an outstanding turn-on for your dollar.

Visit Boob Exam Scam - View Replies - Add Reply

Ladyboy Gold Review

Sun, 07 Mar 2010 07:34:56 PST

Ladyboy Gold (2)

03-07-10 07:34am

REVIEW = 79 by Druppie (3)

Pros:
Very attractive Ladyboys
Large archive of HQ photos
most scenes are bareback!

Cons:
almost all scenes are P.O.V.
navigation is a bit lacking
could use more hardcore video content

Bottom Line:
I joined Ladyboygold with two things in mind: I knew I'd be able to see a lot of bareback hardcore sex and beautiful Ladyboys. I was sure that there would be plenty of hardcore content to go around since with access to Ladyboygold I also got access to ladyboysfuckedbareback as well. I wasn't completely disappointed, but let me explain.

So you can get value from this review, let me tell you what I like in a good shemale or ladyboy scene. I love to see bareback (no condom) sex, I also like to see the camera angles change so that I get to see many different points of view. I really love seeing a man have sex with a transsexual but every now and then its nice to see the tables turned.

Unfortunately all the research I did and previews I saw for the site still had me believing I'd see everything I wanted. First off, yes there is a lot of bareback sex! The down side to the bareback sex is that most of it is shot in P.O.V. When I say most I mean practically every scene. There is nothing wrong with P.O.V. but I just think that they should almost advertise the site as such. Another thing that bothered me is that a lot of the video content is solo masturbation. Again, nothing wrong with that but I'm just not that into solo stuff, I want Hardcore action! I can't recall any scenes where that Ladyboy fucked the man either :(

Well the site is not without some positives. But overall if you are looking for a HQ hardcore site this might not be the best site for your money. I encourage you to read my other reviews of some really fantastic Transsexual sites!

Visit Ladyboy Gold - View Replies - Add Reply

Explicite Art Review

Sun, 07 Mar 2010 05:51:21 PST

Explicite Art (6)

03-07-10 05:51am

REVIEW = 60 by orgasmation (0)

Pros:
The videos are available in several formats at good resolutions - no fuzzy edges or blurring. The performers are generally good-looking. Download speeds are generally good.

Cons:
On several occasions the site was unavailable or key features of sign-in or download did not work. There was no response from site management to my repeated concerns.
The camerawork can obtrusive and offputting, and emphasizes the feeling that it is all staged.
Last - and maybe a matter of personal taste - very much a French site. I can't get excited about a guy named Titof, or a video named Youplaboum... and in these minimalist times, I prefer girls with visibly pussies, not Afro-style growths between their legs.

Bottom Line:
If you like girls with funny names, overgrown pussies, and oversized cameras, go for it. I decided not to renew my subscription because the site owners were not concerned about performance issues.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Chick Pass Review

Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:53:09 PST

Chick Pass (2)

03-07-10 04:53am

REVIEW = 68 by bacardiancoke (18)

Pros:
- Huge Collection of material
- Proper amateur work, very natural with no visible known porn stars
- good download speeds

Cons:
- Very poor navigation
- Search facility is more basic than a Jungle toilet
- inconsistent material
- Can't decide if the site is value for money or not
- Updates are nothing to write home about
- X Sales. Sign of a con artist, not a good way of building my trust!

Bottom Line:
If you are looking for amateur (sometimes user submitted porn) then this is certainly a place to entertain for one subscription period.

It is generally passable and for those who like their amateurs then it will keep you entertained for a while.

I won't go into individual "stars" due to the way that the portal is structured and will instead take an overall view of presentation and content.

Presentation

I grow tired of portals and sites that are stuck firmly in their "pre-2005" type design and layout. It is lazy and insulting to those of us who pay good money to use your sites. PLEASE will you start modernising!

Design - poor and confusing. They appear to have tried to make it simple and have instead left it with a bizarre structure that is confusing, even to someone who's seen hundreds of porn sites.

Navigation - a hatefully basic search facility where you can click on "tags" but cannot exclude and results are limited when committing to a genreal search. Please sort it out, a tag cloud and improved search function isn't that difficult to magic up.

Content - inconsistent and varied. Of course you would expect that with an amateur site, but some are directed by a fairly professional team yet are still inconsistent. How does that work? If the webmasters offered hints and tips to the models then submitted content would very much improve to those who aren't sure.

Value for money - this I'm really struggling with. They say you get what you pay for in content, but I'm a little pissed off that the design and navigation qualities of the site make me NOT want to look in the first place.

Conclusion

Chick Pass is in bed with TAC Amateurs and is very much the poor relation. This is intended in reference to the state of the site not the content. If I'd known that a site would put me off visiting it then I wouldn't have visited in the first place.

Models of Chick Pass, make your voices heard. This is your revenue that the bone idle webmasters are costing - the portal needs investment and modernising, badly!

Webmasters of Chick Pass. Please stop insulting those who invest in your business and crack on with the much needed work. If your portal was easier on the eye and to navigate then your result would have been closer to the one that TheBestPorn offered (which I bitterly disagree with at present).

Visit Chick Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

Pier 999 Review

Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:49:01 PST

Pier 999 (0)

03-06-10 02:49pm

REVIEW = 82 by tangub (4)

Pros:
Decent amount of content
Lots of exclusive content of well known euro babes
Photos look great
Zip down loads for pics
Good mix of solo, g/g and b/g content
The higher res 720 x 400 vids look great but not all the vids have this option
30 second preview and screen caps available for many of the vids so you can check them out to decide if they are worth using some of your precious daily download limit on
VIP lounge now included with standard membership
CC Bill

Cons:
Site no longer updating as of January 2010
2 GB download limit per 24 hours
Photos maybe too airbrushed or photo shopped for some tastes
No real model bios
Many of the latest video updates only in smaller option and look quite poor on full screen
Some models with unusual names here
Many models not listed in the model index and no search function
Videos not listed on the models page so you have to browse the video section separately to try and find videos of a certain model

Bottom Line:
I�ve had this site in my list of possible joins for about 3 years now but it�s never quite
come to the top of the list until last month when I was checking out the preview and I noticed that they are no longer updating the site so I thought I�d better join and grab what I want in case they have plans to take the site down like with their old asian 4 you site. My favourite niche is solo model photo content so I found plenty here to keep me interested, lots of exclusive photo sets of many of my favourite babes such as Eve Angel, Sophie Moon, Peach, Evelyn Lory and Milly Jay to name a few. Only problem was trying to grab it all within a month with the measly 2 GB download limit. You need to keep an eye on your downloads to avoid being locked out for 24 hours. With a lot of the newest pictures coming in 2000 px res and the zips being about 70 or 80 mb plus you don�t get many for your 2 gig a day. The most common size for the older content is 1350 px.

If you go to the models index page you will find around 80 plus models listed, by no means all the models on the site so maybe it�s only the models with exclusive content listed here, not quite sure, so I found the best way to browse the site was to go through the updates calander to make sure I didn�t miss anything. By doing this I came across 7 nice 2000 px photo sets of my favourite model Monika Vesela but on here she is under the name Irena Barry and there�s no mention of this alias or photos here on her eurobabes index page so this was a nice find for me

There�s quite a sizable archive of content to plough through here as the site has been updating on average 2 photo sets per day 5 days a week since back in May 2006 but sadly the updates have stopped as of January this year. I guess that�s why they now include the VIP section to compensate for lack of updates but all that consists of is around 100 plus galleries and a handful of videos.

I can�t say much about the videos because they don�t really interest me at all but the couple I did check out looked good in quality, 720 x 400 at 1700 kbps although quite boring as they were only solo model photo shoots set to music. Plenty of g/g and b/g content here though if that is your thing.

Overall I enjoyed the site with the only real irritation being the download limit, quite honestly if it was not for this I could probably have grabbed what interested me and finished with it in a week or two. If you�re interested in the glamour photo thing and you�ve not been here before I�d recommend it for a month but if you�ve been here before probably not worth coming back now the updates have stopped.

Visit Pier 999 - View Replies - Add Reply

MC Nudes Review

Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:27:04 PST

MC Nudes (5)

03-06-10 08:27am

REVIEW = 95 by Torque (0)

Pros:
The photography is excellent.
The girls are beautiful - some beyond Belief (Tiffany, for example)...They let you rate the girl AND each set of pics....

Cons:
Too much back-buttoning and scrolling down the names to check out each model....

Bottom Line:
Bottom line is - I belong to 5 other "soft porn" sites and MC-NUDES is by far the superior one.

Visit MC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

Amateur Match Review

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 14:53:42 PST

Amateur Match (0)

03-05-10 02:53pm

REVIEW = 81 by thecrow80 (0)

Pros:
- easy to navigate
- search profiles by proximity
- fun chat and IM feature
- certain profiles have verified photos
- lots of videos and live cam shows
- flash games

Cons:
- working the search feature takes some time to figure out best way to find locals.
- lots of ads in sidebar
- private messaging is hit and miss

Bottom Line:
This site is all about doing things in real-time. Using the IM and live chat is the best way to talk to real girls over the PMs. There are live cam sessions going on all day and are pretty fun to watch. Using the search takes a little practice to get used to. Site could use some tweaks but it's not bad.

Visit Amateur Match - View Replies - Add Reply

Latex Angel Review

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 08:26:58 PST

Latex Angel (1)

03-05-10 08:26am

REVIEW = 65 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
Lots of videos (~210) each being on average 10 minutes long.

Very fast download speeds, when downloading 10 files simultainiously my 100mbps connection is maxed.

No download limits, no DRM, all exclusive content

Very extreme fisting, dildo, piss, deep throat, fruit n veg, enemas etc

Cons:
Low res (512x384), low bitrate (~800kbps) videos. In these HD times that just doesnt cut it.

Very repetative. After you have seen 10 or so videos there is nothing new.

Only 2 - 3 updates per week. This is maybe a Pro given the Con above.

Expensive

Bottom Line:
The site has been around for years. When it first started, this sort of extreme content was not that widespread and, when it was available, was performed by the same sort of average (at best) looking women.

Nowadays fisting and large toy sites are ten a penny, often featuring very attractive to beautiful women who seem to be actually into it. Unfortunately Ms Angel seems to be mute, incapable of smiling and gives no indication whatsoever that she is actually enjoying what she is doing.

Visit Latex Angel - View Replies - Add Reply

First Anal Quest Review

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 06:29:57 PST

First Anal Quest (3)

03-05-10 06:29am

REVIEW = 70 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
65 high quality 720P videos
Zipped picture sets
Decent download speeds
No fuss navigation
Exclusive content

Cons:
Not all scenes have picture sets
Male actors hit and miss. Some seem amateur
Female quality could be better
Expensive
No network access. Yes you get access to a DVD archive but that's hardly exclusive content

Bottom Line:
The main problem with this site is that you will see the same girls doing anal on other sites and usually with far cheaper memberships and/or with decent network access. e.g. AnalTeenAngels.com features much the same girls (and some of the guys) but costs only $20 for 70 HD scenes plus network access. That alone makes this site hard to recommend.

Secondly, the director seems to have instructed the girls to act shocked and in pain while taking this "first anal" which is silly for a couple of reasons.

1. If teen anal movies are your thing you would have already seen the girl quite happily take one for the team without the play acting.

2. The girls are not at all convincing in their "performance"

This makes a lot of the scenes seem completely unnatural.

That said there are a couple of scenes featuring either genuine pain or good acting. If that's a pro or a con I will leave up to the reader to decide.

Visit First Anal Quest - View Replies - Add Reply

Fisting Special Review

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:45:40 PST

Fisting Special (1)

03-05-10 04:45am

REVIEW = 75 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
Good quality 720P video on some scenes

Large number of videos

Membership includes 8 sites of different niches (Fisting, teens, lesbo, dildo, milf, pissing, pussy pump)

The included pussy pump website features pretty unique content

Nice looking Russian and EE babes

Decent download speeds

Cons:
It looks like at least some of the video has been upscaled from DVD to 720P and at low bitrate.

Quite a bit of non-exclusive content (Mainly from Sweet Pictures Rough & Beyond and Shameless series of DVD's as far as I can tell)

Average of only 10 pictures per scene and no zips

Near nonexistent description of most scenes. 80% of scenes don't even give the actress name.

Only 1 - 2 updates per week

Expensive

Audio on some scenes seems to be overdubbed in English. Other scenes have Czech or German dialog.

Bottom Line:
OK, I will admit it, the only reason I joined was because Super Mega Extreme Gaporama Babe "Alysa" stars in 4 scenes. For me that alone was worth every penny of the membership fee. Once I had downloaded those 4 scenes and started looking at the rest of what was on offer I find it hard to recommend for long term membership.

The content is mostly good but if you own DVD's from Sweet Pictures, you will see a lot of recycled content. Although the network contains 8 sites (plus 1 streaming site), the individual sites don't really have much of an identity with a lot of cross-over between them.

I didn't put this in the pro / con section as it is too subjective, but a lot of the content is pretty extreme even by Dutch / German standards.

Visit Fisting Special - View Replies - Add Reply

21Sextury.com Review

Fri, 05 Mar 2010 02:15:52 PST

21Sextury.com (2)

03-05-10 02:15am

REVIEW = 80 by BadMrFrosty (10)

Pros:
Wide variety of content
Video quality
Good looking girls
Main sites have exclusive content
Download speed
Great value

Cons:
Occasional major drops in download speed
Site stability
"Upgraded" videos
Picture resolution

Bottom Line:
I actually joined AnalTeenAngels.com but as my comments are valid for the whole network, I thought it best to place my review here. This is the second time I have been a member of the network, the first time being from Sept - Nov 2009. A special offer email tempted me to join again now (Mar 2010), the offer is actually the same that is available on this site ($20 a month)

A lot has changed since I was first a member. Most notably the interface. Reading reviews here I see there are mixed feelings on this, I personally like it but I using only very basic features. I find the interface allows me to quickly queue up for download all videos and photo zips for a whole site to download. My only wish would be to have direct links to download the whole video scene and zip picture pack at the top of the scenes page.

The download speeds are generally excellent, I have a 100mbps connection and 90% of the time I can download a 2 GB scene in just under 3 minutes. Other times the download speed drops to a crawl and I am lucky to get 20KB a second. Thankfully these slow download periods only seem to last for a short period and them pick back up again.

In addition to the periods of slow downloads, there have also been times when the site has been down completely. I have only been a member for 3 days but in that time there have been 3 periods of 2 - 3 hours where the site completely refused to work or would work for a minute and then die with all sorts of nasty errors. They were server errors (database timeouts mainly) so the problem was definitely not at my end. Funny thing is, the non member pages were working OK when the members area was having issues so they must be hosted separately, smart but sneaky move.

I also notice since my last membership they have been upgrading a lot of the older videos (.mpg, .mp4) to wmv. Having downloaded several of these new upgraded scenes I have to say that the quality is noticeably WORSE than the original files. The new high quality WMV files are lower resolution, lower bitrate and have completely washed out colours when compared to the original file. So don't waste your time "upgrading" your collection.

If you have read to this point you are probably wondering why I gave this site a 80 while banging on about its problems. The bottom line is, once you have actually downloaded the content and don't have to deal with the technical issues plaguing the website, it is just really fantastic. Catering to a wide range of tastes, featuring some beautiful Euro Babes and (in the newer videos) absolutely fantastic picture quality. If the technical issues can be ironed out I will without hesitation give the site 90+

Visit 21Sextury.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Nude in LA Review

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:07:31 PST

Nude in LA (1)

03-04-10 09:07am

REVIEW = 75 by rearadmiral (24)

Pros:
- This site provides material in a poorly served niche � U.S. Public nudity
- Some beautiful women strolling fully nude in public
- At least a couple of well known stars participate (Hailey Young and Veronica Jett)
- Daring and different (for the U.S., anyway)
- Simple navigation (but how could it not be in a site this small?)

Cons:
- Small site (but it may grow)
- Pics are available, but no zips
- Videos are broken down into smaller files (approx. 35MB each)
- No option for full-length videos
- HD is available, but you have to pay extra for HD VOD
- Download managers don�t work (I use Free Download Manager but not to bring in multiple files at the same time � just to queue up files so I don�t have to sit at the computer and click �save as� all evening)

Bottom Line:
Excellent Premise, Flawed Execution

I�ve never been so torn in writing a site review. This site provides material that is almost impossible to find anywhere else � U.S. full public nudity. The site is small now (21 photo sessions with each session having shoots at four to six locations) but it does appear to be updating. I�m not sure of the update schedule. If I figure it out I�ll post an update.

I give full marks to the models on this site � they put themselves at some risk of getting caught. The material itself is very good if you�re into this thing. If not, it will seem tame and even boring. My only complaint about the material is that the editors have managed to strip away a lot of the titillation too. The site presents women nude in public but never shows the set-up or the girls� nervousness, which can be a big part of the draw for some people into this niche. The sense of daring is absent, much like it is on European sites. It shouldn�t be absent here though, since the models are at some risk doing this in the U.S. Otherwise, the women are beautiful and they get fully nude in public.

But� the owners or managers went and fucked it all up. This site is a credit to websites of 10 years ago. There are pics, but no zips. There are videos, but they are low resolution and broken down into smaller files. Download managers are not supported. They claim that HD videos are available, but you�ll have to pay extra for those once you�re inside the site.

There are things I�m willing to excuse: the site is new so there won�t be a lot of material yet. I understand that. But why put the models and crew at risk and then present the material in such a poor way? This is an under-served niche and those of us who like it would support a well done site. With changes, this could be a great site.

For now, this site is only a good value if you are a die-hard nude-in-public fan. If, as the grow the site, they improve the video quality and provide full-length videos they could be an amazing site in a poorly-served niche.

Visit Nude in LA - View Replies - Add Reply

Play Sex Game Review

Thu, 04 Mar 2010 08:25:16 PST

Play Sex Game (2)

03-04-10 08:25am

REVIEW = 62 by silver (41)

Pros:
+ 100% original 3d content
+ You can make your wild sexual dreams a reality
+ Decent quality of 3D graphics
+ You can join Play-sex-game.com with your credit card, check, or telephone
+ The game called �Sambuka� - based on Adobe Flash technology
+ Alice 3D - You can create your own girl
+ Sambuka - In contrast to webcam chats there is no restrictions on what she can do, and what she can�t. As well as you need no to type anything to say model what you want. Just show it with mouse � she�ll guess right.

Cons:
- $24.95 for 10 days (trial)? This stuff is too pricey
- Sambuka - demo version is not interesting and containing no hot interactive videos
- Sambuka - No Hi-Res photos
- Alice 3D - this demo is a restricted technical sample of the game. No cloth collection, no speech, no rooms, no partners, no toys and restricted game control
- Alice 3D - some browsers (Opera, Mozilla) are not compatible. You must use Internet Explorer. Using Firefox, I got a Javascript application error dialog box stating that "3D Life Player installation failed"
- Alice 3D - the actions are too mechanical

Bottom Line:
Play Sex Game is a toon site where you get 100% original 3d content. This site has two games: �Sambuka� and �Alice 3D�. Both of these games do not require installation or copying to hard drive. You can play at the game called �Sambuka� right in your browser, no matter PC or Mac, Windows or Linux. All you need is Adode Flash Player. If you want to play the game called �Alice 3D� you have to install 3D Life Player. The size of data transfer is 14,3Mb. Important notes: some browsers (Opera, Mozilla) are not compatible. You must use Internet Explorer. Be sure ActiveX is on. Mac OS users - even if demo works, entire game will not work due to file systems differences.

The game �Alice 3D� I did not like. The actions seemed to me too mechanical. As for the game �Sambuka� the model looks much more realistic there. You can release your dreams and make your girl covered with sperm. You can come on her face or fill the mouth, splash her ass, body or pussy and do it as much as you want. She likes it all.

Visit Play Sex Game - View Replies - Add Reply

Grandpas Fuck Teens Review

Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:10:50 PST

Grandpas Fuck Teens (2)

03-03-10 09:10am

REVIEW = 80 by mbaya (276)

Pros:
-Nice size archive.
-Part of large network, 21st Sextury. Get 30 other sites with one membership.
-Very sharp quality videos. Available downloads are parts as well as whole videos.
-Sharp large photosets. Not very high resolution, but very good quality.
-Zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Mostly attractive models, but not consistent.
-Nice discount through TBP.

Cons:
-Photo sets not custom zipdownloadable.
-No choices regarding resolution quality.
-I don't care for the network policy where we do not have any choices regarding which sites are included in the membership. You get what they decide.
-Basically the European version of gonzo. Very standard and predictable action and models, despite this being a niche site.
-Confusing search engine. If you click by model, you get hits on every site in the network, even those you are not subscribed to.

Bottom Line:
I am so glad I was a member of Beautyandthe senior first. The contrast between the two is quite stark, despite the fact that they share some of the same male talent and are both representative of an unusual niche.

In many ways this site is superior. Some examples of why I say this are the better quality of the videos, faster download speeds, the option to download whole videos, as well as superior photo sets that are zipdownloadable.

In BATS the models are consistently better looking. Many here are overdone with stripper clothes, excessive makeup, tattoos, fake breasts and in general look like they all came from the same factory. Very predictable, very standard, but not very creative or fun.

More importantly, the differences between the two sites are the intangibles that are not easy to quantify. BATS is about fantasy; this site is very standard in ways that most sites are. BATS scenes are focused and short. In contrast these scenes are much longer, with the types of sex that are common on the internet. For example most scenes focus on a long vaginal section. Many scenes have anal as well as analingus. You may like this, and I do, but how is this different from most sites that are not in this niche? Here they use older men to do the same things that you see on other sites done by younger men. At BATS the feeling is that these older guys need all the oral stimulation possible. In this they seem to be hard for about a half hour of vigorous action focusing on penetration. Nice, but you see that on all kinds of sites that are not in the niche.

I greatly appreciate BATS use of highly creative fantasy and an uncommon approach to porn that includes a lot of kissing and foreplay. BATS has unlikely, dreamlike scenes and the scenes here feel like you have seen them before.

This site is interesting, but nowhere near as unique or as much fun as BATS.

Visit Grandpas Fuck Teens - View Replies - Add Reply

Spicy Roulette Review

Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:02:52 PST

Spicy Roulette (2)

03-01-10 10:02am

REVIEW = 82 by silver (41)

Pros:
+ 100% exclusive content
+ NO DRM Protection
+ Real girls with real interactions
+ WMV, MP4 video formats
+ Hi-Res Photos
+ Hi-Res Video
+ Amateur-looking models
+ Nice video size (1280x720)
+ Some of the babes looks really nice and have real natural bodies
+ Download Manager/Accelerator friendly
+ iPod sized MP4 format also available
+ 10+ Episodes (approx. 60 min. each), 10+ Photo Shoots (avg. 600 pics each)

Cons:
- Faster updates would be good
- Empty forum
- No free live cam shows
- Stupid games
- No Trial Membership

Bottom Line:
Recommended if you like real sex games played for real by real models

Visit Spicy Roulette - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Porno Pass Review

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:16:27 PST

Teen Porno Pass (0)

02-28-10 08:16pm

REVIEW = 69 by kyote1 (1)

Pros:
A fair amount of movies. Sexy scenes. Navigation is good. Download speed is ok. It's a Network of sites. Best for quality is Sasha Von. There appears to be a new addition tonight. Cheerleader Facials. Content matches Network site description.

Cons:
Poor video quality. Too bad because the movie content looks pretty good. Hard to watch. Cheerleader Facials is not taking me anywhere tonight.

Bottom Line:
Even though there is a very high bit rate on the videos (5k+) the quality is not up to match other sites for the same price. The videos appear to be 4:3 stretched to 1280x720. That does not do much for the quality and not really 1280x720 HD in my opinion. Too bad since the movies look interesting.

Visit Teen Porno Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

Brazzers Network Review

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:09:39 PST

Brazzers Network (18)

02-28-10 07:09am

REVIEW = 95 by dogspoon (0)

Pros:
Frequent updates. The file downloads are easy and file names are provided that provide info on the scene i.e. site and star. The site is easy to navigate and it allows you to mark your favorite scenes and stars. Searching for specific scenes by different criteria is easy.

Cons:
It could use more girls and it seems almost all of the girls look like your stereotypical pornstar with huge tits. However, I believe this is what the site is all about. It could use more natural breast sized girls.

Bottom Line:
Not only does this site have frequent updates and big name porn stars, the website itself is very well designed.

Visit Brazzers Network - View Replies - Add Reply

Warm Kiss Review

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:05:42 PST

Warm Kiss (1)

02-27-10 01:05pm

REVIEW = 75 by kkman112 (12)

Pros:
Excellent Super-HD quality videos (SD and HD MPEG and lower-res WMV formats)
Content is very amateur / pro-am
Exclusive content
Many exclusive / semi-exclusive models

Cons:
Site is TOO amateurish in design.
BMP format preview, logo, and background images
~2 updates per month
No search
No model index
No real still images beyond some screen captures

Bottom Line:
The real ONLY reason this site got such a high rating is the content alone. The content is excellent. The site is primarily a video-only site. There are sets of pictures from some of the videos, but do not look like pro-photos. The photos all appear to be screen-captures from the videos themselves (no still camera involved or was integrated into the video camera). Many videos feature unknown or little-known models (with a few known porn models thrown in). Sadly the site only gets ~2 updates per month (some months may only get 1)... so this site could seriously use more frequent updates. The site design, and quite simply is setup could be MUCH better. I had actually emailed the owner (Ryan, one of the male models as well). He appears to be the sole person running the site from what I can tell and told me he is not very knowledgeable about creating sites. He did give my an in-depth explanation on why most the videos are MPEG instead of the more popular H.264, DivX, or WMV (the lower-quality videos are in WMV). The images on the page typically take 2+ minutes to download on a broadband connection and are in Bitmap (BMP) format. I did suggested to him to use JPEG images that are lower file size and download faster since much of the text is white and the background remains white as well until ~2 minutes later when the blue background image finally loads.

In conclusion, the content is GREAT but needs more updates than 2/month. The site needs a COMPLETE overhaul. At the very least needs images that will load faster and a better stylesheet/color selection. In terms of what the female models; most are very attractive, very amateurish with a few known porn models and unattractive models. There appears to only be two male models: Kyle, and Ryan (who also runs the site). Personally, I think they would be further ahead to hire a 3rd person to work soely on their site and focus themselves on getting more updates out the door... or selling to a company who has more resources to do so.

Visit Warm Kiss - View Replies - Add Reply

Metro Babes Review

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:21:55 PST

Metro Babes (0)

02-26-10 10:21am

REVIEW = 55 by toolhull (0)

Pros:
Nice large thumbnails of girls. Easy to follow chat.

Cons:
When I joined, they froze my account, until I filled out a heavy user form. It is easy for me to buy $100.00 in credits at a time. Instead of 25.00 at a time.
Very high per min rate for just avarage looking girls.
This content comes from any of the Streamray sites. It is the same as CumTV or Camgirls, etc.

Bottom Line:
Take your hard earned money somewhere else. Can do better st other sites.

Visit Metro Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

Real Teenie Girlfriends Review

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:02:30 PST

Real Teenie Girlfriends (1)

02-25-10 04:02pm

REVIEW = 52 by slutty (33)

Pros:
-Decent Download speeds
-Download managers work
-Some of the girls are attractive

Cons:
-Small collection, some of which appears to be from another site - jailbaitvideos - and these videos are particularly sketchy as some of the girls look aweful young (although they don't have nudity they are just dancing around)
-Bonus sites are equally crappy or streaming only
-Trial give you access to practically nothing, parts of 4 scenes that aren't downloadable
-Expensive
-Crazy false advertising, I saw very few of the girls shown on the home page in the site
-What I consider unethical site behavior, see me comment
-No pictures except screen caps of videos, although it would appear from the front page that there are many pictures
-Video quality is mediocre to poor (1500 kbps typical)

Bottom Line:
I thought this site sounded sort of interesting, however it proved to be pretty crappy and very misleading both in price and content. I strongly discourage anyone from joining this site. I tried to come up with some other pros, but I must admit I couldn't really think of any.

Very sketchy site, I recommend you look elsewhere.

Visit Real Teenie Girlfriends - View Replies - Add Reply

21Sextury.com Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 19:17:33 PST

21Sextury.com (2)

02-24-10 07:17pm

REVIEW = 91 by Wittyguy (71)

Pros:
+ Sweet TBP/PU rate of $20 to join, eventually dropping to $10 month for ongoing membership
+ Thousands (maybe even 10k) of scenes
+ 25 sites network initially, expands to about 41 after a month
+ Good navigation and the search engine looks amazing and goes across the whole network
+ No DRM and no DL limits
+ Newest vids on the flagship sites (PixandVideo, Club Sandy, etc.) go up to 1900x1080
+ All pic sets have zips
+ Professional effects, lighting and photography on the flagship sites
+ Clearly marked updates
+ No cross sales or advertising
+ Lots of hot euro babes
+ Wide variety of content with multiple daily updates across the network
+ Archive going back to 2003 on the oldest sites; all exclusive content on the flagship sites

Cons:
- For the first month, only SweetSophieMoone, AssholeFever, PixandVideo, ClubSandy, LezCuties, FootsieBabes and BlueAngelLive have anything great to offer. (I refer to these below as the Flagship Sites)
- Scenes aren't tagged real well so the awesome looking search engine can leave stuff out.
- Broken links on some photos and preview thumbs (click the "x", it's probably there) and I got a few bad video downloads.
- DL speeds not so hot (mostly 120 to 500 kps, the more channels I have going the faster it seems to go for me).
- Pic sizes are obsolete for the level of quality they otherwise offer.
- Zips and movie files are not labeled well.

Bottom Line:
I used to love the individual sites but rarely joined in the past because of price. With the sweet PU/TBP deal, I couldn't resist and will probably stay a member for many months, damn near a first for me. Here's the low down:

PICS: All scenes have zip but all pic sizes are limited to 1280x850. WTF? The flagship sites here scream quality but they're still launching 20th century quality with their pic sizes. Most scenes have 100 to 160 pics. Also, when viewing pics individually the horizontal slide bar doesn't automatically appear on landscape shots (again, why?). Once you get past the Flagships, the pics are few and far between but there is plenty to keep you going with the big 6 sites.

VIDS: Awesome size on the newest vids. Most of the stuff within the last few years maxes out at 1280. The oldest content and a lot of the content outside the flagship sites peaks at 640 or even 460. You do get 10 screen caps minimum to see what you're getting. You can DL full scenes or scenes. In browser stream is an option and works well. On the most recent content, you usually have 3 download options, only 1 or 2 on the older. Full scene file sizes range from about 40 mb (low quality) to 2 gigs (best quality). DL speed is an issue as I noted above.

SEARCH: There is a 25 filter search system which looks awesome. As noted, the problem lies in the lack of adequate tags. Thus, the system sort of defeats itself and you're better off just going through the sites you like one by one. There is a central model directory which appears complete but no model bio's are given.

As for "the rest": Some sites have lots of dead links for pics and the like. Just click them, they usually bring something up but it's annoying and a pretty basic problem to overcome. If you liked the old calendar version of the site, the new set up takes a little getting used to. However, after a few days I found it much easier to use, especially on a network this size and found they had lots of options for customizing. It didn't take more than a few clicks to go and get what I wanted.

A big issue for me is why are they adding all this content beyond the flagship sites for the first month. It's obviously 3rd party produced and the models and production values just aren't up to 21stSextury snuff. Apparently they feel the need to keep up with Brazzers or NewSensations and add a bunch of sites to pump up the numbers and add "new" sites with overlapping content. My advice is to keep your standards up and focus on the good sites you already had. I'll take quality over quantity ... especially if you boost your pic sizes.

Lastly, despite the many negatives I pointed out, I'm still scoring this one a "91" simply because of the volume of content on even just the flagship sites, the hot babes and hot videos. With more sites coming to me soon, it can only get better. Well worth a join even if it leaves this picture fan a bit miffed.

Visit 21Sextury.com - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Core Club Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 16:14:19 PST

Teen Core Club (5)

02-24-10 04:14pm

REVIEW = 82 by TheSquirrel (18)

Pros:
Very attractive new models
Good quality pictures and videos
Some good clothed and softcore pictures as well as hardcore
No DRM or download restrictions
Professional non irritating males
Good download speed
No condoms
A lot of action and no talk
Good billing agents. I used CC Bill
but I believe Epoch is also available
Natural girls with very few plastic breasts and
unsightly tattoos
Exclusive content

Cons:
Lousy/non existent customer support
Annoying log in and navigation
Expensive
Few updates
Pictures are not zipped
Relatively few girls with most appearing
on all the main sites of the network.

Bottom Line:
Please note that my membership ended in August.
The network contains 15 sites but only a handful that are top rate. However the top rate ones are superb IMO. They have the freshest and newest performers who are either first timers or very new to porn. The girls are generally very attractive.
One of the advantages of these sites is the great pics of the girls starting from fully clothed and slowly stripping down. There are plenty of pictures of girls fully clothed, partially clothed, nude, then then hardcore scenes. The picture sets usually contain around 600 pics so there are around 100 fully clothed to partly clothed then around 100 posing nude followed by the hardcore stuff. I think the softcore fans would love the softcore pics here. Maybe this angle gets overlooked because the hardcore stuff is extremely hardcore.
The videos start with the guy undressing the girl and getting down to oral followed by sex straight away.
Ass Teen Mouth is just that. It contains oral followed by anal. Some of the scenes are choking, but are not particularly nasty or excessive. The picture sets still contain the softcore stripping.
The pictures and videos are nearly all the same style and usually set in the same studio. This could be considered a pro or a con. Personally I like it although it could be considered a little samey. I like it because you know what you are going to get.
Compared to some sites there are relatively few models, with quite a few appearing on different sites.
The male performers do what they are supposed to, and the cameraman keeps out of the way.The males are not irritating.
The material has the freshest faces, captured by professionals with great camerawork and bright lighting which results in high quality videos and photos. Some may consider the results to be clinical but I like that look. There is no plot and no build up in the videos. The model sits on the bed, is stripped by the male and it's straight down to action. No pretence. It's just models being paid to do a job and then getting on with it.
The best quality pictures are 853 by 1280 and the best quality videos are 960 by 540 with bitrate of 3000.
The older material has less high spec.
I think the videos and pictures look great although I understand these specs mean they are not really high definition.
Streaming is available.
Some of the sites have not been updated for a long time, and have low spec material.
Some of the girls are too skinny for my taste.
The bad stuff is that the site is run by people who couldn't care less about their customers. Communication with them is impossible. They never answered any of my emails. The log in procedure is a real pain. There are no zipped pics, which means every one has to be individually downloaded.The whole feel about the place is that it is run by people who have complete and utter contempt for their customers. It has great material let down by typical lousy management.

Visit Teen Core Club - View Replies - Add Reply

DDF Prod Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:40:26 PST

DDF Prod (3)

02-24-10 07:40am

REVIEW = 95 by nadiencendia (49)

Pros:
-10 sites for the price of one (really good deal)
-Very hot models, including Sophie Moone, Eve Angel, Eufrat, Blue Angel...
-Different fetishes and niches: feet, blowjobs, teens, busty ladies...
-Good picture and video quality
-Huge archive
-Different download and streaming options
-Up to 3 updates daily

Cons:
-Sometimes (very seldom) they reuse older material
-The main site doesn't "remember" the login details
-Some sets are pics-only
-Only two simultaneaous downloads (more if you are downloading from different sites within the network)

Bottom Line:
As other reviewers have already stated, any "con" that we may find to this site-of-sites is nitpicking. The quality and quantity of the contents is one of the highest online; the girls are gorgeus and Denis de Francesco is a great photographer and director. Lighting of the sets is almost always perfect, just as make up, sound and picture. I only wish the models would "act" a little more and talked a little more, but them not being native English speakers, I guess that's difficult.

I don't think anyone who joins this site, and who liked DDFs previous work will be dissapointed. There is no trick, no limited access, no billing trap (that I know of). Just one year ago, I was happy to pay this same money to get access to just one site (hotlegsandfeet); know, I can also get access to nine other sites, and although some of them don't interest me at all, I do find occasionally some very nice sets that I would have missed if I was a member of just one site.

I see that 21st Sextury also offers now this kind of mega-pass: I may try it when my subscription to DDF expires, although I doubt that it will have the same outstanding level as this one...

Visit DDF Prod - View Replies - Add Reply

Bring Me Your Sister Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 07:40:13 PST

Bring Me Your Sister (0)

02-24-10 07:40am

REVIEW = 50 by theswedish (0)

Pros:
The models are unique to the site and the site has three of four different sites you can browse, although the models are spread over the four sites. The models are for the most part natural looking and not the usual porn star looking.

Cons:
The script is poor, the fact that the models appear on the other sites with different story lines discounts the feel of reality. The download speed is the worst I have seen for a long time. Running it real time does not work, and I am using a 35mb/sec connection as well, running at 18mb max as I write. Once content is downloaded there are so many artifacts in the video that it is almost not worth watching. It's a shame as it could have been a good site, but the delivery is so poor that it frustates more than anything else.

Bottom Line:
Nice try, too many things wrong.

Visit Bring Me Your Sister - View Replies - Add Reply

Explicite Art Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:07:34 PST

Explicite Art (6)

02-24-10 06:07am

REVIEW = 95 by Helvetic (8)

Pros:
+ 100% exclusive content
+ nice looking European (French mostly) models
+ variety of actions (soft/hardcore, straight/lesbian, masturbation/peeing/fisting/etc)
+ high res pictures (up to 2000*3000 for newer content) and video (1280*720) with a range of formats (including iPod version)
+ Downloads in zips
+ no DRM

Cons:
- continuous condom use
- original French content (with only further translation to English)
- some scenes are too short to focus on them
- pricing for Europe (�30/month)

Bottom Line:
Explicite Art is a collection of nice looking French models (currently 362) in a variety of situations and actions: soft and hardcore; solo, straight and lesbian; masturbating, peeing, fisting and so on, both in pictures and video, with updates coming almost every day (they have explicitely excluded only Sundays). Immediate drawback is that the original language is also French, which only then translated to English (subtitles here are, probably, the best solution as they allow keeping intact the emotional component of sounds).

EA's attention to technical quality results in pictures up to 2000*3000 px, which is more than necessary for just full screen viewing, with smaller versions of each picture for sorting/previewing, and true HD video (1280*720). Pictures can be loaded in zips; video is in a range of formats (MP4, MOV, ...) with a special version for iPod.

With all the above $24.95/month is a quite reasonable expense. European customers have to pay more: �29.95/month recursively. It looks like the "special offer" does not work or has its very specific meaning to the east of Atlantic Ocean.

Overall impression: site really deserves attention.

Visit Explicite Art - View Replies - Add Reply

Fucking Gamble Review

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:03:06 PST

Fucking Gamble (4)

02-24-10 06:03am

REVIEW = 96 by Helvetic (8)

Pros:
+ unusual idea
+ both WMV and MP4; resolution up to 1920*1080 (12 Mbit max); normally 1280*860 6 Mbit max
+ 480*270 MP4 with chapters for iPod
+ frequent updates (30 min video in 2 days in average)
+ no DRM and watermarks
+ fair pricing for European customers ($25 = �18)
+ helpful replies from webmaster

Cons:
- more types of models would be nice
- substantial part of video is in Hungarian with English subtitles only
- fancy age verification (but this is for the first visit only)

Bottom Line:
If you have already discovered that sex is gambling (if beyond marriage), FuckingGamble could catch you. The story of each video (presently 25, about 3 hours each) is a game, from waterball to bowling, and who wins the round has his bit of sexual fun first. It looks like nobody knows who will win next, and what exactly will happen to him and the others then. Models are mostly (Eastern-)European; in more recent updates the diversity is higher. The dark side is that video comes in Hungarian(?) with English subtitles only. Again, in a few recent updates models are native English speaking. (Side note: emotional part of the sound is quite clear, and does not require even subtitles).

FG is definitely video quality maniacs: with normally 1280*860 6 MBits max, greatest resolution found was 1920*1080 12 Mbit. While it could hardly be possible to find a tremendous difference between the latter one and 6 MBits on a standard computer monitor, dedicated systems (say, Apple Cinema) will help to get true pleasure from such technical advances. Video comes in both WMV and MP4 (.m4v) formats. Lower resolutions for each movie is also available. In addition to that each video comes specially encoded as 480*270 (iPod says thanks for that and for chapters, which it can navigate through).

Finally, their price (currently $25) is, pretty good for such quality, and is rather fair for those paying in euro ($25 = �18). Overall impression: the site can definitely be recommended as a fresh and unusual idea with high quality delivery.

Visit Fucking Gamble - View Replies - Add Reply

Judy Jade Review

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:33:58 PST

Judy Jade (1)

02-23-10 06:33pm

REVIEW = 82 by Drooler (194)

Pros:
+Exclusive photography of �Judy Jade,� a.k.a. Czech super-cutie Veronika Fasterova, or Verunka (what I�ll call her here)
+Verunka comes across as very sweet, friendly, playful, and sexy here, with a considerable range of expression. It�s a refreshing change from her typically cool, aloof, goddess-like presence at some other sites.
+Poses start in a wide variety of coverings, from a simple towel to all manner of skimpy outfits to street clothes that would invite persistent whistling
+All shoots are done indoors
+Photos at 3500px or 2544 at least
+Variety in lighting, color, tones and textures (usually acceptable, though not always)
+Galleries range from 40 to over 200 pics each; many are substantial
+Zips of the large-sized photos
+It�s a LARGE collection (well over 160 photo shoots) that is still updating
+NO TOYS!!

Cons:
-Some pics at full size are blurry and therefore pointless
-Some galleries have mix of tints and hues; not the most professional
-Server can get pokey when browsing
-Updates come SLOWLY, around 2-3 per month
-Downloads are rather slow at about 350kbps
-Smaller �med� sized pics are only at 400x600
-Thumbs of landscape pics aren�t WYSIWYG
-Some sets have nudity or mid-stripping first and �fully clothed� later
-Full nudity not achieved in all sets (esp. the first 28 or so), but in plenty just the same
-Watermark can be a nuisance in tighter shots
-From later July 2009 to the present, shoots are broken into 2-3 postings
-From mid October 2009 to the present, some of the same partial galleries are posted twice under different dates. It�s very obvious. What�s up with that?
-No videos, sorry. But just as there are �video only� sites, here�s one that�s only photos. Hey, that�s the breaks, buddy.

Bottom Line:
�Verunka.� I�ve always preferred that name for this girl. It�s uncommon. Besides, if you say it repeatedly, it sounds like a bed banging rhythmically against a wall.

This site has its flaws. The blurry pics are the worse of that, followed by the mix of tints and hues noted above. While some galleries look pretty close to "pro" in quality, there are others where you wonder if someone is playing around with the camera (or software) settings for focus and color and brightness/darkness. Someone obviously doesn't care if you wind up paying for the unedited results.

And then there's the watermark. It's easier to tune out than those at some sites, but it's still too "there."

If you�re into toy play, or masturbation by hand for that matter, you may not like this site anyway; there�s neither. She touches herself fairly often, but there's no rotation of the sugar plum.

But if you�ve got the time and patience to look through everything here, you�ll find plenty of real exclusive gems of Verunka giving you an attitude that you don�t often get at the more �artistic� sites, along with some very clear, crisp ass shots. And even though it�s a pricey single-model site with no vids, no guests, no toys, and no working on the whisker biscuit whatsoever, as single-model sites go, it�s better than the average. I�m certainly glad I plunked down for it this once.

Visit Judy Jade - View Replies - Add Reply

Viv Thomas Video Review

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:50:24 PST

Viv Thomas Video (2)

02-23-10 03:50pm

REVIEW = 90 by slutty (33)

Pros:
-Good sized collection - over 650 models
-Models are quite attractive, most of the popular euro models area available here
-Excellent download speeds (1.5 MB/sec)
-Download managers work
-Photosets downloadable in zips
-Video quality pretty good: 640x480, 2084 kbps
-Good variety of content
-Good camerawork on photography and videos
-Photo quality is acceptable, but not the best - newer stuff is 1280, older stuff worse

Cons:
-Orginization could use some improvement. Not really sure what the purpose of listing the DVDs is, as all the scenes I saw on the DVDs were listed under the video section of that model anyways. A search function would be nice.
-I found some of the sets to be a bit heavy on the makeup, which is not really my thing - I prefer the more natural look
-Could improve photo and video quality
-No bonus sites
-A little pricy

Bottom Line:
A pretty good site, definitely better than most. Certainly worth joining, even if like me, you aren't a fan of overly madeup girls as there are still plenty of good scenes.

The content is mostly solo and lesbian, in the video section there are:
50 Boy/Girl scenes
210 Solo scenes
440 Girl/Girl scenes
(The sort function doesn't work great, so these totals might be a bit off)

Although the boy/girl scenes they have are pretty good, if your main search is for boy/girl I might look elsewhere.

As Exotics has said many times, and I agree, this site has some of the best lesbian content on the net.

In summary, pretty much a top tier site that most people would probably find worth joining. If they improved video quality and picture quality a bit this site would probably be even higher on my list. If you are a fan of hot euro models, and especially lesbian content, you won't be disappointed here.

Visit Viv Thomas Video - View Replies - Add Reply

Long Hair Divas Review

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:44:41 PST

Long Hair Divas (1)

02-23-10 12:44pm

REVIEW = 76 by Karasek (6)

Pros:
+ very long hair, gorgeous woman
+ webcams (archived)
+ constant updates
+ very large pics (up to 3800x2500!)
+ Zip files
+ personal feedback
+ variety

Cons:
- videos to small (640x480)
- new updates smaller than in the past
- site design not very intuitive
- some content in better quality costs extra
- tattoos

Bottom Line:
Longhairdivas is the personal site of a woman called Leona. She's a beautiful mature woman with very long, blonde hair. She manages the site all by herself. The site itself isn't that intuitive, but since she does it all by herself I overlook this.

The site offers videos, pics and webcams. The pics are very big, which is good, but strangely the vids are small, too small for 2010. The archived webcams are offered in the usual resolution (320x240), but interestingly also available in a bigger resolution (640x480). Sadly you can't get these bigger webcams with your membership but have to buy them for ~$25 each.

The content offers a great variety. You get photosets of Leona just posing fully clothed, of course nudity, hair fetish and lately also hardcore. I have to say that the photoshoots were better in the past, and the new hardcore vids are still a bit clumsy, but that's probably not that bad since you really get this amateur feel.
The site also offers a forum, where you can chat with Leona, or request something.

The site gets updated every week, and each update offers either a video, a photoset or one or two webcams. I'm a bit dissapointed about this. As a longtime member I remember earlier times when updates often included both a photoset and a video or a webcam, sometimes all three. The change came after the restart of the site, and since that time the quantity and quality (of the pics) isn't as good as before anymore.

The site costs $25, which is OK, but if you bear in mind that the quantity of the content decreased there is a bitter aftertaste. Or it's just inflation. I would gladly pay a few bucks more for the webcams in the bigger resolution.

Bottom line: if you love really long hair there is no better site to join. Leona is moreover a gorgeous curvy beauty who you can enjoy even if you don't share that fetish.
I downgraded the site because of the small videos, the quality of the pics and the smaller updates. With HD vids, more creative pics and bigger updates I would give the site more than 90%, since there's hardly a lady which better serves this particular fetish.

Visit Long Hair Divas - View Replies - Add Reply

VideosZ Review

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:09:57 PST

VideosZ (9)

02-21-10 02:09pm

REVIEW = 50 by DigglerFL (17)

Pros:
Lots of content
Newer Videos have good quality

Cons:
-False Advertising
-Many videos not available at all
-They seem to buy videos that no-one else wants - too many chicks that aren't all that attractive
-"New" Releases are often videos that are 10 years old.
-Too many scenes are poor quality even on high quality download
-I hate their flash viewer
-you have to frequently log back in

Bottom Line:
I was a member of this once before, so I guess its my fault for giving them another chance. I found something on this site that I'd been trying to find for a while, and the "Free Preview" shows that its available for download. After joining, it shows "Coming Soon" which basically means "sorry charlie, we fooled you".

A large number of videos are not available. You waste tons of time finding something and then find out its not available. Or sometimes the quality is so bad its not worth watching. Their "New Releases" are new only to the site. On March 1, 2010 College Girls Do 4, a video from 1999 was presented as new. Do I want to see Julie Meadows before she got her boobs done? I guess they get better deals buying old videos that nobody else wants. There's no way to sort on ACTUAL release date. So you have to sift through all of the old garbage. Virtually none of their "new" releases are new.

Their viewer will not allow you to advance the playhead past whats been downloaded. If you do, it terminates and you have to start over. This means you can't jump past the interview or the masturbation or whatever. A real time waster.

If you buy the argument that our most valuable asset is time, this site wastes more of your time than any other I've been on. You search for something you want, and then you find out its "Coming Soon". There is so much garbage; so many unattractive women, that it takes a long time to find anything really good. Then you find out that the video was encoded 5 years ago and the quality is unwatchable. Or if you find something and you don't feel like watching 10 minutes of ass-licking you can't jump past it in their viewer.

They still have login problems. You'll be navigating around and
for no apparent reason you'll get the invitation to join page.
Another time waster and annoyance.

They get the lowest score mainly because they falsely present videos on the preview that are not available when you pay. Cheats get the lowest score. Otherwise I'd give them high 50s, mainly because they don't have real new releases, and because 2/3 of their content is encoded in low quality.

*** UPDATE ***

My month is just about up now, so I wanted to report 2 things:

1) All 3 of the videos I was interested in when I first joined are still not available, despite Clement's claim that they would be done in 2 weeks.

2) They are still advertising the videos as being available before you log in only to be Coming Soon once you do log in. So clearly they are comfortable baboozling people and they think they make more money with such a practice than they do with an honest approach.

I'm very comfortable giving them the lowest possible rating. So I guess we're even.

*** Another Update ***

I've discovered that these guys have another bogus front end called porneskimo.com. They have the same videos advertised that they don't actually have available. I guess they're hoping to cheat the same people more than once.

Visit VideosZ - View Replies - Add Reply

Curvy Kitty Review

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 12:45:07 PST

Curvy Kitty (0)

02-21-10 12:45pm

REVIEW = 89 by bpboy (0)

Pros:
This is one of the sexiest ladies on the net for me. With all exclusive content. all her movies are downloadable and she takes it in the dirtbox while wearing stockings. This lady is a goddess, she sucks cock like nobody's business

Cons:
You dont get to see her beautiful face enough as she gets a good shafting.

Bottom Line:
If you want to get a raging erection this site is for you. looking forward to the next update with a box of tissues

Visit Curvy Kitty - View Replies - Add Reply

We Are Hairy Review

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:10:43 PST

We Are Hairy (3)

02-21-10 09:10am

REVIEW = 80 by mbaya (276)

Pros:
-Billing through CCBill without regional pricing.
-Hi Def videos
-Super high resolution photo sets
-Custom zips available as an option.
-Helpful and friendly webmaster. Excellent customer service.
-Forum and photoset comments by Capn and Messmer.
Great to see friends from PU.
-Two uploads a day, but mostly photos not videos.
-Download manager friendly.
-No download restrictions.

Cons:
-Needs more attractive girls. They are natural but often leave something to be desired.
-Few models are not very thin. Not much variety in size, body shape, or age.
-The site has American models, but not yet a single one that is any race but white. Surely they can be found and photographed.
-The videos are nearly all masturbation. I prefer teasing,stripping, or just about anything but not hands on or inside their pussy,or toys.

Bottom Line:
After reading reviews by some PUers that I really respect a lot, I decided to join a site dedicated to bush.

My first experience involved billing and entering. I got immediate helpful answers from the webmaster Basil. Nice first impression.

The site layout is simple and uncomplicated. There are enough options to make navigation easy. The search engine works just fine. There are no broken links and no other problems.

The first section I checked out was the videos. While the quality was great, I just don't care much for masturbation either manually or with toys. Not good. I kept nothing, as the content was not to my taste.

However, I had been expecting the photo sets to be the best part of the site, as it usually is with softcore sites.

Many of the models were of close to legal age. I wouldn't mind that, but with zero or almost no makeup, the acne that many have is just a turnoff. I like natural, but a touch of makeup is fine with me. Acne, no way, sorry. There were a few mature models, but so far very few. There were a few with at least C cups, but not many. Most were A's and B's. That can be attractive, but I also would prefer more with larger size breasts.

I hate tattoos and piercings. While only a few had either or both, I was turned off that any did. At least their bodies were otherwise all natural with no boob jobs.

Most, I felt about 75%, of the women on the site were very ordinary in their attractiveness. That can be ok, but the site definitely needs more of the better looking ones.

While the photos were of high resolution and I love the custom capability of the zipdownloads, I feel the site needs a lot more growth.

With two updates a day, I am sure the site will continue to improve. It definitely has potential. However, the site is not yet ready to get a score better than 80 from me.

Visit We Are Hairy - View Replies - Add Reply

Ladyboys Fucked Bareback Review

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 04:47:34 PST

Ladyboys Fucked Bareback (1)

02-21-10 04:47am

REVIEW = 84 by axel2001 (20)

Pros:
- Exclusive content.
- NO DRM.
- No Download Limit.
- Many video formats (WMV, MP4, iPod, Stream)
- Regular updates (updates every other wednesday (1 movie episode and matching photo set).
- Easy to use and navigate.
- Many on-topic extras including news, feed, personals.
- Lots of model info.
- Real ladyboys bareback content.
- Access to bonus sites (Ladyboy Gold).

Cons:
- Not too many sets (19 video and 19 pics sets).
- Some of the extras are not as good quality as the main content.
- Only a few really hot models (compare to LB-69).
- Small base of models.
- Content has no date stamps.
- No ZIP download (you can download ZIP files after being member more than a month).
- Some models you can meet on others ladyboy sites.
- Updates are not dated.

Bottom Line:
This site offers good quality exclusive content with Thai ladyboys in bareback scenes.

Navigation
Navigation is pretty easy. When you get access to Ladyboys Fucked Bareback you get access to memeber zone of Ladyboy Gold with Ladyboys Fucked Bareback as bonus site. So navigation is the same as on Ladyboy Gold. You can use the model index to see who is showing on the site. When you click through the pages you find text with information and descriptions, clear and easy to view sample images, clear links and fast loading pages. Technically this site is quite good.

Content
They have 19 exclusive sets of videos and pics. Each video 20-22 minutes in average and each pic set contains 120 pics in average. Videos can all be downloaded or streamed. A WMV medium files have a resolution of 3.06Mbps @ 482 x 270, which is pretty good for a �medium�. There is high quality format either. The HD version is going to be like. (5.02Mbps @ 1280 x 720 actually).After being of member more than 1 month you can download high quality pics in ZIP format.

Bonus
As I said before joining Ladyboys Fucked Bareback you get access to Ladyboy Gold. Ladyboy Gold has more than 200 photo and video galleries and some more extra content (WallPapers, News, Personalities, Amateur Ladyboys content). There are 37 reviews with details about 37 clubs, hotels and other places of interest to visitors to Thailand and its Ladyboy scene.

Total
So my verdict: This site is really worth to join especially for ladyboys funs.

Visit Ladyboys Fucked Bareback - View Replies - Add Reply

Fucked Hard 18 Review

Sat, 20 Feb 2010 19:38:44 PST

Fucked Hard 18 (3)

02-20-10 07:38pm

REVIEW = 95 by Fredincorona (2)

Pros:
Very cute, hot girls! Actually, they are the same girls you'll see shopped around the rest of the porn industry, but there's something about the way this site is set up that makes them look way hotter than in other venues. Or maybe it's that there isn't that much setup to this site at all - less is more and the lack of over-production means you can concentrate on the sex. Anyhow, these girls look natural and fresh - like women you might actually meet in real life.

The quality of the clips is very good. You can see everything. The set is bland and the scenes are formulaic, but that only makes the action more striking.

The creator of the site is obviously listening to the feedback on here - there is more masturbation in the more recent clips, more creampies (yay!).

The site is designed the way you hope a good site would be: easy to navigate, dated updates, no download problems, no DRM, growing every week.

Every hot new porn star should have to rotate through this site.

Cons:
The masseuse is a little too rough, and the look on some of the model's faces shows it. Like other reviewers, I don't like hitting or hair-pulling. A little finesse would increase this site's hotness by a factor of ten.

Some of the models get into the act a bit better than others.

Bonus sites are worthless because they only allow streaming.

Photos are screenshots and suffer in quality and posing.

Not much else is wrong ...

Bottom Line:
I LOVE THIS SITE - in fact, it may be my favorite porn site ever.

The concept is pure genius. Girls comes in for a massage, sexual tension builds, differential nudity/power situation, girl gets turned on and initiates sex. Very original and very erotic. And because the formula is actually somewhat plausible, it's very easy for the viewer to put himself in the position of the guy - lucky guy! That some of the models begin masturbating spontaneously when they are rolled over is ... my God ... simply beautiful. There's something about a woman actively shopping for sex that is devastatingly hot. Maybe have her pay the guy before she gets undressed! Hhhhuuuuhhhh ....

This site has none of the bored-stripper-who-just-needs-the-cash-for-meth feel to it. And absolutely none of the IKEA furnitured-primary colored-overlit-Russian crackwhore with blown pupils feel of Euro sites. It's exactly the opposite. Maybe it's because the director gets these models young before they are jaded by the rest of the industry's gross-out tactics. Yes, it can get a bit hokey after watching the tenth one ("gosh, where should I put my panties?") and some of the models look awkward in the role, but who cares? The ones who get into the act are great!

Some close ups would be nice. A dash of anal, perhaps? A few more MILFs (not the jaded kind) would be good, too. I like what you've done with the just-outside-the-strike-zone-creampie endings - I've always believed they were more erotic (and more personally familiar) than the obligatory facial cumshot.

Some of the scenes could be improved if the girl could play up the role of being the sexual aggressor a little more ... sometimes the masseuse has to start the ball rolling by taking her hand and pushing it towards his dick - which breaks the spirit.

Otherwise, I can only hope this site will grow and go viral. The rest of the industry should study this new Tarantino.

(tossing roses) Genius! Bravissimo! Truly a work of art that brings tears to the eyes ... and other bodily secretions elsewhere.

Visit Fucked Hard 18 - View Replies - Add Reply