PU - New Replies

RE: Hardcore

Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:39:15 PDT

Sexy Babes (4)

07-25-08 01:39am

COMMENT REPLY by zijaanzicht (0)

To TheRizzo (13):

Almost equal but this site has slightly better resolution and a little more edgy b/g scenes that are sometimes very rare even for being leased (if applicable).

I personally like this site more than twisties due to the clarity and less compression artifacts often seen in some sets at Twisties. They appear to no longer show if the other sites update (at least to non-members). My guess is NO and they have simplified the site to the flagship sites.

View Thread (1)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:57:30 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 10:57pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadmix (18)

To badandy400 (57):

I think the admin is looking for away for us to do it ,but perhaps after some other users show concerns he will let me review it again.
Possibly.

No not a member anymore but would rejoin to give a better review if they removed the old one.

Thank you for the support I appreciate it.

Toadmix

View Thread (11)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:25:38 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 07:25pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To Toadmix (18):

Curious, are you still am member there? If so please tell me more about the site. I would love to join, but at this point I am having a hard time swallowing the idea of a 2 GB download limit. I really want to know what they are doing that keeps people there so I know if it is worth me trying out.

View Thread (11)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:20:53 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 07:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To Khan (Staff):

Wow. That would be kinda nice! Sorry, I do not mean to be making any stink here. I thought a user was able to redo a review or change a score anytime, obviously I could be mistaken as it would not be the first time. I know a review can be edited up to a month later, I just thought it could be overwritten by a more current review from the same user. Can we currently do that? I have never tried it, but it would seem logical since sites change.

Again, I apologize to you, Khan, and Toadmix if I am causing any headache.

View Thread (11)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:53:00 PDT

07-24-08 05:53pm

POLL REPLY by pat362 (20)

The late great Jim Holliday always had issue with people using the term DP to refer to anal and vaginal penetration. He always thought that it should be called a sandwich.
He might have technically been right, but in todays porn a DP is always suppose to be anal and
vaginal penetration. The simple fact is that a DPP is double pussy and DAP is double anal.

View Thread (7)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 16:58:08 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 04:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To Toadmix (18):

Can you post a new review and have it overwrite that one? I cant believe they will not take it down though? Oh well.

I agree completely though. My first several reviews sucked ass! I left out good information and made them pretty short. I was able to change them though because it was in the first month.

Your reviews now days are pretty good. I especial like the Rachel Aziani review, I think it is better than mine. You have my trust vote! I was just hoping you would be willing to update the review since it was from when you first started and bring it up to par with your newer ones, but I am now not sure if you are able to.

View Thread (11)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:39:11 PDT

07-24-08 12:39pm

POLL REPLY by Wittyguy (23)

I agree with most here by defining it as V & A. I would also expand the definition to include toys in the V & A as well.

View Thread (7)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:16:35 PDT

07-24-08 12:16pm

POLL REPLY by Drooler (138)

To Denner (134):

For vaginal plus oral the dictionary might also include the parenthetical "(see tag team)."

DP doesn't interest me, BTW. I'm not into groups, not even small ones. But the poll question did get my wheels turning about the polysemy of the term.

And there's something rather polysemous about the way those DP scenes come to an end, too. (Awww! This going too far!!)

View Thread (7)

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:01:52 PDT

Errotica Archives (3)

07-24-08 12:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (138)

To Denner (134):

Yes, it is like that old car. You're going along, and everything seems to be working well, and then ... screeech! ... you come upon the scene of an accident! Image number 23!

"I couldn't get a good look at the girl's face, officer. There was so much excessive light shining, with heavy contrasting shadows. And it was all just a big blur anyway."

View Thread (2)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:49:53 PDT

07-24-08 09:49am

POLL REPLY by Toadsith (42)

Generally, if I see a scene is described as including a DP I expect vaginal and anal simultaneous penetration. However, I would accept and dual penetration involving the orifices that reside between the model's legs. I do get annoyed when a scene involving oral and vaginal or anal sex is described as double penetration - that simply does not qualify in my opinion.

View Thread (7)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:46:49 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 09:46am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Toadmix (18):

If it's a consolation ...

We're currently working on a policy change that will allow you to go back even late after the fact to update your earlier reviews. Can't say more just yet.

View Thread (11)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 09:26:02 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 09:26am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadmix (18)

To badandy400 (57):

I did look at when I did the review, I have already asked Admin to remove but nope they said it stays as it is. was alearnbing experiance. I have changed how I do reviews and I am much more accurate check em out ok?

Toadmix

View Thread (11)

RE: New Look

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 08:57:53 PDT

Errotica Archives (3)

07-24-08 08:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (134)

To Drooler (138):

Thanks for that update on EA....
Reading the first part - I thought: maybe EA has come around with better content, better allround....
But it seems to be a socalled "facelift" - like when a four-five year old car-model needs reneweal - we change a little bit here and a little bit there......but when it comes down to facts...most is just the same old story.

View Thread (2)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 06:47:45 PDT

07-24-08 06:47am

POLL REPLY by Denner (134)

Weird poll, folks...
Please lets get it together with some better ones - but ok, it's vacation-time.
And the Drooler really freaks out here... funny analogous - and I certainly agree about Fargo - Dark!
But anyway DP: the sites that boasts of DP is mainly one item: V and A...
So what the heck: V and A it is....

View Thread (7)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:54:59 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-24-08 04:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To badandy400 (57):

But what you seem to be forgetting is that (currently) there is a time limit on when a Review can be edited. That review is over seven months old.

While YOU might WANT the Review revisited, that still doesn't make it something he can currently do.

View Thread (11)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:19:11 PDT

07-24-08 02:19am

POLL REPLY by Drooler (138)

It's analogous to asking someone to think of a comedy movie. My bet is that the first guess could include A Night at the Opera, Animal House, or one of the Airplane movies (they're old but they're classics), but it wouldn't include Prizzi's Honor or Fargo, which are both very dark comedies.

And so it is with DP. I first think of anal + vaginal. But I'd include vaginal doubled and vaginal + oral as secondary entries in my mental porn dictionary. So anal + vaginal is the definition of highest frequency/the first dictionary entry.

View Thread (7)

RE: I think of DP (double penetration) as ...

Thu, 24 Jul 2008 01:49:49 PDT

07-24-08 01:49am

POLL REPLY by Belthazar (0)

When You are singning contract in Adult Bizz, then in Europe the definition of DP - Anal + Vaginal sex.

View Thread (7)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:14:07 PDT

Rachel Aziani (5)

07-23-08 11:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To badandy400 (57):

hehe...yeah certainly it looks like it is his way of replying. i am not the only how get`s a bad reply from him ^^..but at least he can`t vote me either because he hasn`t got 5 points :)

View Thread (20)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:22:13 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-23-08 07:22pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To Khan (Staff):

Khan

Truthfully I did keep that in mind. I did not realize is was his first day, but I figured it was close to the beginning. Actually I did the about the same thing when I first began posting! Haha! I guess my point was we need more details, granted it is an older review now, more detail would be great and is needed to support such a score even if the information comes months later.

Actually I find Toadmix to be fairly trustworthy, his new stuff is pretty good. Many of us have gotten a little better after a few. The recent review of Rachel Aziani was pretty good! Sorry if it seems like I am picking on him, he just seems like the type of person that if you told him his review was junk he would actually go back and make it better and more inclusive. Forgetting to mention a very stringent download limit of 2 GB is pretty important in my opinion and worth fixing in a review. It is the only thing keeping me from joining this site honestly! But it could very well be a difference of opinion or priorities, we are all a little different and not everyone is a download hog like me. :)

I would just like to see the review revisited and updated to show more information. He might have a damn good reason for a 100, but at this point I do not know what it is. I am not being mean to him, I just really want to know what made this site so great in his eyes since I have never been there.

View Thread (11)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:54:00 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 06:54pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (12)

To exotics4me (277):

Things are weird, all right! Just went to the site and sure enough the updates are unbroken, yet they never showed up any time I signed in. The fifteenth of this month was the last update listed in my browser. The company is located in Aruba, The Netherlands Antilles, but there's an announcement on their entrance page, dating back to February, that leads me to believe that their server is in Atlanta.

Just in case this might not be so I took a speed test from Curacao (Aruba's next door neighbor. Aruba itself wasn't listed) to Eastern Canada: The speed was quite good at 9000 kbps but, by comparison, I tested Atlanta and got a speed of 15180 kbps or a 1897.5 KB/sec transfer rate. A far cry from 89 KB/sec. :-)

BTW, referring to a previous post complaining about a lack of response from support, someone does speak English there because I got a reply from them when first I joined and did their survey. Of course, it could have been one of those automated responses but I find it hard to believe that someone in Aruba, involved in any business at all, couldn't speak enough English to serve the majority of their customers.

Ah, well, it's over and I'm glad that things appear to be working for you.

View Thread (7)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:43:03 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-23-08 06:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To badandy400 (57):

badandy400, I would point out that the review in question was done back on Jan 1st of this year ... the same day Toadmix opened his PU account.

I don't say this to undermine what you've said here, only to point out that it's probable Toadmix is a little more conscientious with his scoring now.

View Thread (11)

RE: Do you typically read the replies to Comments/Reviews?

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:05:38 PDT

07-23-08 06:05pm

POLL REPLY by pat362 (20)

I always read them.

View Thread (10)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:29:34 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 04:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (277)

To messmer (12):

Hey Messmer, that brings an interesting laugh out of me. I once heard of a site years ago that would give anyone who was reviewing the site, a different membership than those who bought memberships, so the reviews would be very high, but the work they put into the actual member site, very low.

Not that I think that is the case, but I do think browsers can play a part in problems. I do know that American Vice, DVD site with 5 free tokens for download for a free trial almost never works at all with any browser except IE. I generally use Firefox, and am using it right now. If I'm not using it, I use Flock, which is a new variation of Firefox that makes my sports blogging a lot easier.

You can still see the updates if your subscription ran out. Go to the main page and click, "New Releases". It will let you see all of the updates without logging in.

With the download speed, that one really doesn't make much sense. You're listed from Canada, I'm from the US, so we shouldn't see a big difference in download speeds, though if you ever want to see the difference locations can make on download speeds, go to speedtest.net and click one of the pyramids far from your location, make note of your speed, then do one closer to you and you can see the difference.

Here is an example of mine.

When I use the Los Angeles test, my download speed is 9,981, my connection is 10M, so that is almost exact.

When I use the Johannesburg, South Africa test, my download speed is 4,792 which is less than half the speed I was getting with the Los Angeles test.

Even worse, I just tried connecting to Calgary, and only got 2,355 download speed. I never realized there was this big of difference. I'm not for sure where Adult Movie Club is located, but those few tests makes me think that could be a problem that you are having with the speed. Just not making a good connection with their server. I also tried connecting with King Rupert, Canada but only got a 4,100 speed with it. Truthfully, anywhere I try to connect, I get a better speed with than the Canadian test sites. I actually got a higher speed connecting with Europe on one than I get connecting to Los Angeles, which is about 20 minutes from where I am.

Things just get weirder and weirder ha ha.

View Thread (7)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:14:18 PDT

Rachel Aziani (5)

07-23-08 04:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To lurifax (0):

First of all, you should bitch about Videobox on the Videobox page. Ace of Aces is experienced at reviewing yes, but not on the payroll.

You seem to have a real problem with this site, so what things about it do you not like? I have read your comment already, but their has to be more than that making you mad about it.

View Thread (20)

RE: ace of aces's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:10:42 PDT

Rachel Aziani (5)

07-23-08 04:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To ace of aces (82):

Hum....looks like someone is on the rag!

Admittedly I did not give the site a 99 either, but it certainly is not far from it in my eyes. There is a lot of good things going on here. Besides, it is not like you are a "one review wonder" here after all you are in the top 10 rank here at PU. Dont worry, they guy in 12th agrees with you!

You just cant make everyone happy. At least he cant vote against you yet...haha!

View Thread (20)

RE: Toadmix's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:01:40 PDT

Digital Desire (9)

07-23-08 04:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by badandy400 (57)

To Toadmix (18):

Toadmix

Come one man, you can't give a site a 100 when it has a download limit, especially one so low as 2 GB. I am really surprised you have not caught a bunch of hell around here for this review score.

Granted it is a site I would love to join, but not for 2 GB a day. It is a simply scam to force people to stay members for a very long time.

I know some people cry about 100s and say they should never be given. Personally I have no issue with them so long as the reviewer can give some very good reasons. So please tell us a bunch more about this place, and be very specific on my it deserves such a high mark. Many say a site can have no cons period to be a 100, I do not subscribe to that completely. However, I believe download limits are a major con that can not be overlooked.

View Thread (11)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:59:06 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 03:59pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (12)

To exotics4me (277):

Twilight Zone time, exotics4me. Things were indeed as Denner and I described them ... for us! He didn't mention the lack of updates but I haven't seen any since July 15th. I even hit the reload button on my browser just to make sure I wasn't looking at an expired page even though I don't even use the cache! :-) Sorry to say I can't go back to see if the updates show up now because my subscription just expired. It was a horrendous experience for me. The flash streaming didn't work most of the time, download speeds were terrible, around 89 KB/s, worst I ever experienced with a site, while you seem to be quite content with them. Could there be something about the browsers? Denner mentioned that his Netscape didn't work and I used Firefox. Let us all sing: Two different worlds ... !"

View Thread (7)

RE: nineinch's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:44:49 PDT

Danni.com (5)

07-23-08 03:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by nineinch (8)

To Monahan (27):

Thanks for the reply. I never know how people will react to my reviews.

All of the Danni-vision is gone, or I can't find it. Some of it has been remastered as WMV files, but not a lot. In many cases, they just include the images from those "Live Events".

As far as I can tell, the DRM stuff is completely gone. I too built up a large collection of DRM-protected videos with the supposed "life-time guarantee". I was able to download the non-DRM versions of every one of these files. The old names were like:

13793_00_1000.wmv

and the new ones have names like:

13793_00_1000__4095.wmv

The later files are a couple of bytes smaller (minus DRM??). Unfortunately, you cannot search for content by filename, so this was a bit time-consuming.

View Thread (2)

RE: Do you typically read the replies to Comments/Reviews?

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:30:11 PDT

07-23-08 02:30pm

POLL REPLY by apoctom (140)

If the comment or review got my attention, I'll usually want to read if there is a replay. But if it's just any old post, I'll skip the replies, too.

View Thread (10)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:44:31 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 01:44pm

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (277)

To messmer (12):

Hey guys,

Messmer, I was just on the site and they have updates listed, 3 per day, for everyday. Go to the site and click updates. There are 3 new releases listed for each day from the 15th to today.

The titles and date.

7-15: Amazing POV #3*, Anal Addicts, Girls of Taj Mahal #10
7-16: Amazing POV #6*, Cum Swallow, Eat Like a Real Man
7-17: Ice La Fox is a Dominatrix*, Fuel Injected #5*, Anal Addicts #4
7-18: Multiple Chicks #3, Tranny Hunter, Nautica Thorn aka Filthy Whore*
7-19: Teen Pink POV*, It'z A Black Thang #4, Girls of Taj Mahal #3*
7-20: Nasty Newcummers #21*, Strap on MILF Hookers, Raw Meat
7-21: Real Squirters #3, Nyomi Banxx is a Dom*, Latin X
7-22: Amazing POV #4*, Interracial Cream Pies #4, Pussyman's Fetish Party*
7-23: Pussy Foot'n*, Anal Addicts #9, Skin On Skin

*means good download

I don't understand the differences we are seeing, as you all are also seeing differences with the TBP reviewers as well. It really is like the site has two different personalities!

I had planned to come back to it to get the rare exclusive ones they have added lately.

As far as an email goes, I wouldn't hold my breath, they don't speak English. So I am guessing they don't read it either. Go back and check to see if those updates are showing up for you, just to make sure we're not getting a different site.

View Thread (7)

RE: Question

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:23:38 PDT

I Cum Alone (0)

07-23-08 01:23pm

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To Toadmix (18):

have to w8 also..and i think a while..because a new site never has plenty videos :)

View Thread (4)

RE: Do you typically read the replies to Comments/Reviews?

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:25:54 PDT

07-23-08 11:25am

POLL REPLY by Wittyguy (23)

Like most, I think they're useful when you're seriously considering joining a site because they often have commentary about similar sites and they can flesh out some of the details not otherwise discussed in reviews. I tend not to read the replies to one sided reviews.

View Thread (10)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:57:46 PDT

Newbie Nudes (1)

07-23-08 09:57am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (12)

To SurfKing (0):

SurfKing wrote:

"As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know."

I think you might very well be right re. spam but, to tell the truth, that never occurred to me when I read the reply. I just thought of it as the answer of a proud exhibitionist who didn't see any harm in one more voyeur peeking in on her. :-) Too bad the quality of the pictures is so bad, I would have enjoyed a nice, clear, clean (no watermark right across the body!!!) photo or two of the poster.

View Thread (14)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:56:55 PDT

Newbie Nudes (1)

07-23-08 09:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To SurfKing (0):

Surfking remarks: "... and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.

If you'll see Reply #16 & 19 under an earlier Review of this site ... http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=10240

... you'll see our ruling on this one.

Again, this kind of site is a bit of an unusual situation. As always, we encourage Users here to use their best judgement when deciding if a fellow Users' remarks are biased.

View Thread (14)

RE: Question

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 09:04:08 PDT

I Cum Alone (0)

07-23-08 09:04am

COMMENT REPLY by Toadmix (18)

To ace of aces (82):

Nope, havent joined yet but would be interested after ahile to check it out.

View Thread (4)

RE: Not worth the effort!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:17:56 PDT

Newbie Nudes (1)

07-23-08 08:17am

COMMENT REPLY by SurfKing (0)

To messmer (12):

You summed it up perfectly when you said it's a community and should be free. The operators should just carry advertising to pay the bills. You are also spot on when you say it should not be listed on TBP- technically it is NOT a porn site.

As for the other individuals post you responded to, (#8) it clearly falls under "shameless promotions" in the posting rules. That person's post is clearly spam and why it hasn't been deleted I don't know.

View Thread (14)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:11:00 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 08:11am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (134)

To messmer (12):

Hey messmer...
Oh, yes - it's vacation-time (but thanks for that reply)
And BTW: Your word here about AMC is VERY accurate:

"It was not a happy experience even when things worked ... well, in a crippled sort of way anyway."

Totally agree!

View Thread (7)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:32:20 PDT

Homemade Paysite (6)

07-23-08 07:32am

REVIEW REPLY by Penelope (Webmaster)

To qualsite34 (25):

broke down strippers would not be my way of putting it.
Comparing us to the 1000's of sites that offer non-exclusive content.
We are a homemade paysite. I would expect you to compare us to other homemade paysites. We do not try to compare to Twistys or FTVgirls.
Look at the other homemade sites and see if they offer custom videos for members, or video quality even half the size we have.

View Thread (3)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:14:15 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 07:14am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (12)

To Denner (134):

Hey Denner, glad to see your name. I haven't seen it in a couple of days on PU and have missed you. I was really wondering in connection with this site what your experience has been with them lately? Now I know! It almost looks as if they have shut down for a thorough overhaul or they've gone out of business (no updates since the 15th). I, too, am finished with my subscription as of today and am glad. It was not a happy experience even when things worked ... well, in a crippled sort of way anyway.

View Thread (7)

RE: nineinch's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:53:18 PDT

Danni.com (5)

07-23-08 06:53am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (27)

To nineinch (8):

Having been a member during the good old days when Danni ranm the site and things were good with great support efforts, the DRM was annoying but the site provided work-arounds.

Then Danni sold the site, the support staff stopped responding and they stopped a lot of their features, especially the big boob stuff like "Honest Bra" (all naturals). Worse, the work-around for DRM protected downloaded files was dropped so the "Danni Promise," while still on the site, was no longer operative.

Their best feature, in my opinion, is the live shows with member interaction. (The one with Shay Laren was totally memorable.)

But their worst aspect, a non-functional (non-existent?) Customer Support staff and a large bunch of old, but good, content that is available only in "Danni-vision" or in very low res mpeg drags it way down.

Based on this review and the possible improvements that may have occurred during my one year hiatus, it's possible the site has returned to its old glory as a top-notch site. I may sign up again to check things out.

View Thread (2)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:09:17 PDT

Homemade Paysite (6)

07-23-08 03:09am

REVIEW REPLY by qualsite34 (25)

To Penelope (Webmaster):

Sorry Penelope, I did not mean to hurt your feelings. However, you need to understand this site is meant to provide objective information to other potential subscribers as to whether they should join. There are hundreds and hundreds of sites out there competing for our attention and with the economy the way it is we want to get good value for our money.

View Thread (3)

RE: Question

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:31:33 PDT

Serena 18 (0)

07-23-08 02:31am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To loser91 (0):

arf..so less videos only ?! thanks for info, think i will w8 2 or 3 years before i join :)

View Thread (2)

RE: Question

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:29:47 PDT

I Cum Alone (0)

07-23-08 02:29am

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To Toadmix (18):

it`s very expansive, but did you join that site already? price could be ok if it has a lot to give ;)

View Thread (4)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:27:47 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-23-08 02:27am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To qualsite34 (25):

ok, now i know that i don`t try that site..i am a video lover :)

View Thread (9)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:26:44 PDT

I Shot Myself (2)

07-23-08 02:26am

REVIEW REPLY by ace of aces (82)

To TheRizzo (13):

thanks for info...other viewer told me something about that site, it doesn`t look good if you are in vidoes :(

View Thread (9)

RE: Beware!

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:59:40 PDT

Adult Movie Club (3)

07-23-08 12:59am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (134)

To messmer (12):

The site is a total mess...

Search-engine provides you with a lot of stuff you are NOT looking for.
Site only works in Explorer, not Netscape (which is my favorite).

The rutine for streaming is that it works once or twice - then nothing works - not even the downloads. Then you have to shut down the browser and start over again.

When searching for models: Mostly their name do not appear by the thumbnails for download.

Never got any answer after mailing them.

My membership runs out in a couple of days - and I won't be back

View Thread (7)

RE: Beware of this sites billing practices

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:20:22 PDT

Incredible Pass (8)

07-22-08 11:20pm

COMMENT REPLY by dragondly (0)

To Perks (0):

I have had problems with this site billing and refusing to refund the money when I found out they billed.. my cc was stolen and someone used it.. but this company bills though MANY agencies they may claim to use CCBILL or NETBIL bit in fact they use a number of them. I currently have 3 charges totaling $115 for something that I didn't sign up for and still am fighting them (with no luck using their help@incredablepass.com email) I have filed a complaint with the FTC at this point.. go for it look them up or any of the companies they use to bill

View Thread (4)

RE: Do you typically read the replies to Comments/Reviews?

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:30:46 PDT

07-22-08 10:30pm

POLL REPLY by PinkPanther (28)

I only read them when they pertain to sites that interest me - otherwise, no. A lot of times the comments and the responses to comments have a lot of info - but if it's not a site that interests me, I couldn't care that much.

View Thread (10)

RE: qualsite34's Review

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:29:10 PDT

Homemade Paysite (6)

07-22-08 06:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by Penelope (Webmaster)

To qualsite34 (25):

well first of all it would have been nice if you were not happy to contact me. We have several sites I could have switched you with if you did not like this one. Even the one girl you said you did like has her own site.
Anyway you can see our pictures on the tour so not sure why that changes after you join. The pictures on the tour are the same ones in the members area.
Every video on the site is in HD. Some we have added a bigger file for and even the older ones too.
Some of your review is just trash talking so it is hard to even say anything and still be nice about it. Our site is made, filmed and ran by the ones in the videos. I am even in the videos so it does not make me happy to hear your childish remarks. Good luck finding your super model site and I hope you feel better about yourself by talking down to others that worked really hard to make their own site.

View Thread (3)

RE: Question

Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:21:35 PDT

Serena 18 (0)

07-22-08 05:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by loser91 (0)

To ace of aces (82):

the quanity of the video i think it was 10 to 15 vids quality was ok site still new give it time

View Thread (2)