PU - Kteam Enterprises Ltd. - All Activity

RE: A tip

Sat, 10 May 2008 10:38:24 PDT

Kscans (2)

05-10-08 10:38am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (146)

To bunnypu (0):

Well, bunnypu
This used to be a site in the "old days" where quite a lot af PUs had one remark:
Kscams

Have not (for the same reason) been there a while, so if you've joined, it'll be good to hear what's happening in general....

View Thread (1)

Kscans Comment

Sat, 10 May 2008 09:44:28 PDT

Kscans (2)

05-10-08 09:44am

COMMENT by bunnypu (0)

A tip

If you are thinking of joining this site don't get suckered into joining by the pictures of the models on their front page (the top six or seven are usually "future" content). Instead click on the "updates" link to see if your favourite model has had her content posted.

Visit Kscans - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: sisterhood's Review

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:43:38 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 01:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (19)

To sisterhood (1):

Hi sisterhood

one question. if you click the link to view the site...
just after half way down in the NICHE: ENEMA www.ENEMABOUND.com site, there is a blonde girl wearing a pink top...

Is she on the site or is she one of the previews girls that can't be found...

she looks foxy...a bot like that Russian girls Katarina with the Big Tits and dodgy teeth...Ding Dong

View Thread (1)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:13:05 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 07:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (146)

To jd1961 (82):

Either this guy is not for real (in the head) or some kind of "undercover agent for shitty sites".
Well, the trust score puts it in perspective - still it's waste of our time to have a PU like that....

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:57:14 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 06:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (146)

To bunnypu (0):

If not scam - it's close, very close!
A lot of PUs - included this one - has warned about this site/pass in the past.
Nothing is exclusive here and most preview is, yes - totally scam. The content is at best worthless.
The reactions from a lot of PUs should NOW make TBP consider the score of 82,0.
That score is like giving this pass a seal of approval.
BTW, bunnypu - give it a shot with a review here! It'll be welcome.

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:03:08 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 05:03am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Drooler (156):

But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:

http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:45:36 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 04:45am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To jd1961 (82):

Yes, it was a rather sickening experience, exchanging e-mails with this guy who's pretending not to be a representative of the company but just an ordinary user. I played along; wanted to see how well he could play the role without dropping little "tells" in his messages.

Lying tends to put people under stress because they have to keep covering their tracks, and the stress makes them vulnerable to slip ups. But his tracks were all over the place! LOL.

I must say, it was one of those times when the trust ratings really made a big difference.

Enjoy your crow, Markus.

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:52:43 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-27-08 02:52am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (82)

To Drooler (156):

Yes... Like the great Markus:

TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)

This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL

http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:43:26 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-26-08 02:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To bunnypu (0):

The sites from this company are plagued with problems such as you describe. Just read the comments and reviews -- but skip the reviews that are obviously written by shills; there are several of those.

Frankly, I think those shill reviews should be wiped off of PornUsers with a strong industrial cleaning agent. They're an eyesore and they don't belong here.

View Thread (6)

K Package Pass Comment

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:30:36 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-26-08 02:30pm

COMMENT by bunnypu (0)

Where are the advertised models?

Two major complaints about this site; Some advertised content is not available in the Member's Area and a serious mistake in branding some small-boobed, blonde as Kyla Cole! Tried to contact the Webmaster but no reply.

Visit K Package Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Not exclusive/warning

Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:29:45 PST

Euro Hot Babes (0)

12-23-07 03:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Denner (146):

Funny, I saw the review on TBP and had just checked the site. THEN I noticed that it was from the "K-scam" lot and thought, "Oh."

Could it be exclusive content produced on that non-exclusive and notorious couch? Is it simply a popular style of couch that shows up in a lot of places? Wouldn't it be fun to have one, just for the hell of it?

I also love way the TBP folks sometimes say "seems exclusive." We don't want to be told that! We want to know if it is exclusive! DUUUhhhh!

View Thread (1)

Euro Hot Babes Comment

Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:12:07 PST

Euro Hot Babes (0)

12-23-07 11:12am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

Not exclusive/warning

I do not understand how Maggie at TBP can state "exclusive content".
The content are the famous/infamous orange couch-videos that has been around for years at MANY different sites.

And Euro Hot Babes is a part of this Kscans - or what quite a few users/consumers describes as Kscams....and again a part of K Package Pass that may be one of the more serious rip-offs in the bussiness.

Visit Euro Hot Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blow And Swallow Comment

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:54:47 PDT

Blow And Swallow (0)

08-28-07 05:54am

COMMENT by Mort (0)

Not what the name says!

I joined this site recently, and tried a few videos. The name of the site is totally wrong - there is NO swallowing at all (unless by accident), and as well the video quality and resolution is nowhere near what it should be at this price per month.
Very disappointing! Stay away.

Visit Blow And Swallow - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:06:29 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

08-23-07 02:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (156)

To exotics4me (301):

That little "oops" ruse about "accidentally" switching the numbers, here from 27 to 72 models on this site is not the first time I've seen it done. What a bunch of slimeballs.

View Thread (5)

RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:06:35 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 11:06am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (146)

To Drooler (156):

I certainly agree - and I still do not understand the rating at TBP for KScan.

Well, our fellow users can se other rating at PU.

View Thread (2)

RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:43:50 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 09:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Denner (146):

The KScan network or whatever it's called sure knows how to make things look yummy -- to the visitor. Once you see Lucy Stratilova laying on the bed, about to turn belly down for some "peacemaking," the mind starts to replay the credit card info.

I've bought into it 2-3 times myself, but it's always such a downer once you get in. The images are mostly really funky, with poor color control (orangey Sandy and Sophie, pinky Bambi, greyish Orsi, etc.).

And they tell you "we're not professional photographers." For $30?! What a cop out.

There's lots of sites, but it's like rummaging through a line of waste cans just to find something worth it. That was my experience, anyway.

View Thread (2)

Kerotic Comment

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:15:36 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 09:15am

COMMENT by Denner (146)

Poor quality

I've been "traped" into this site - which is part of Kscans - a few times. It's strange than one does not get wiser as times go by...

Kscans and this mentioned site is in one pack - and the content is poor - or the best I can say is that the main part is non-exclusive and it's almost a hassle to move around.
I agree with the reviews from nadiencendia and jake 07621. See their reviews for Kscans.

Maybe this is not such a good "Deal of the day".

Visit Kerotic - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:20 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

07-10-07 11:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To King (27):

Yeah, I will learn my lesson not to run and join every site that says they have exclusive Eve Angel content! On a side note, also watch out for their other sites, listed as K-Package network. There are some high reviews, but the high reviews are from the same ones who gave this site a high review. Probably the webmaster of K-Site's little brother or something ha ha!

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:06:37 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

07-10-07 03:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To exotics4me (301):

Thanks. I would keep away from this site anyway :)

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:29:52 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

07-09-07 04:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To King (27):

The low score is because of the false advertising, and not just with me, but also with TBP. To advertise that I am getting 72 models, only to have 27 when I pay my money is a huge drop off to me. The only content that I will keep is the Anetta Keys, burnt out on Sandy from Clubsandy, Anette Dawn's is a lesbian scene that is about a 3 on a 10 scale in believability, every clip I've seen of her is better. The Sandra Shine content is decent, but nothing great. The rest of the models that I thought I was getting are not on the site. Which leaves me with 5 pic sets and 3 videos that I will keep. The pics are advertised as "large, hi-res" but are only 1024 on the high end, which is barely even average if that. The price on TBP says $39.99 before the TBP discount of $19.99, but if you go to the site without going through TBP it says $29.99 not $39.99, where they are lying to TBP like a grocery store does when they say, "Was $6, now $2" but you see it later for less than $6.

Everything about the site seems hokey. Including the messed up security code. Download speeds are below average too.

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:30:17 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

07-09-07 03:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To exotics4me (301):

I read your review but I cannot understand why 55? You have 5 pros and 5 cons. It would make at least 75 :)

View Thread (5)

FC Nudes Comment

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:04:35 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

07-09-07 12:04am

COMMENT by exotics4me (301)

Warning!

I read the reviews of this site, which a few are really good, one lower one. So I checked the preview out. Wow, looks good, resolution on pics could be better, but the model selection looks like a who's who of Euro models. They are all there, Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Anette Dawn, Sandy, Sandra Shine, Sophie, Angel Dark, Audrey Bitoni, and this list goes on and on.

The preview shows 72 models. So for $19.99, plus my favorite models all on here, this would be a good deal for me. I join.

Hey, wait a minute here. For some reason 45 of those 72 models have NO content. Good business practice says, "If it doesn't say SOON in the preview, it better not say SOON once I pay." As for their promise of soon. Drooler reviewed this site in April, they had 17 models, this is July, they have 27. Ten models in about 10 weeks.

Basic math tells me that means this site won't have all the models they advertise until next year! It is one thing for a site to post a "Soon" under a model who will be on the site within the month. But they have 45 models listed that they don't have ANY content of, and only 27 with content. There are few positives to this site, great Anetta Keys content, but that is about it. My review will explain that.

This site is employing the year 2000 tactics to fool us. Which prides me to say, I will join it again, in 2000. Hopefully those who read this won't fall for their false advertising. BTW, FC stands for anyone who joins it, F*cking Crazy.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: cooldaddy's Review

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:10:42 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

06-03-07 12:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To cooldaddy (0):

If you have none cons, why only 85? Should be 100!

View Thread (1)

RE: Jason LV's Review

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:07:00 PDT

Kscans (2)

06-03-07 10:07am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (234)

To Jason LV (0):

If only you could add some more info ...

View Thread (1)

FC Nudes Comment

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:49:25 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-19-07 11:49am

COMMENT by Drooler (156)

Problem in IE 7

The security code not appearing, which I described already, happened when I was using IE 7 (and Firefox 1.5, too). I tried it in IE 6 and it did work. Markus had said that it looked like I had a browser problem, which is true, although we might also consider the possibility that FC Nudes has an IE 7 problem. Sure did with me.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Markus's Review

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:34:00 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-18-07 06:34am

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

No, not really. ;)

View Thread (3)

RE: Login doesn't work

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:09:43 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-18-07 06:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Markus (0):

I've tried it in Firefox 1.5 and IE 7, in 1024x768 and 1200x800. Cookies are enabled in both with no restrictions. No security code displays.

I don't have this problem in any other sites that require typing in a security code.

Very mysterious!

View Thread (4)

RE: Markus's Review

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:44:58 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-18-07 02:44am

REVIEW REPLY by Markus (0)

To SnowDude (214):

The name of the site is FIRST CLASS NUDES and not FIRST CLASS HARDCORE!
Do you know what i mean? ;)

View Thread (3)

RE: Login doesn't work

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:52:44 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-18-07 01:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Markus (0)

To Drooler (156):

my security code have 4 numbers and work without problems.
i think you have a browser problem

View Thread (4)

RE: Markus's Review

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:53:13 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-17-07 05:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

The fact that it includes hardcore is a bad thing?

View Thread (3)

RE: Markus's Review

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:44:06 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-17-07 05:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.

View Thread (1)

RE: Login doesn't work

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:40:09 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-17-07 03:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (156)

To Markus (0):

Well, Markus, the login page says, "Enter the Security Code as it is shown on the right." There is no security code showing on the right, as I've just reconfirmed seconds ago.

Tell me, how many characters long was the security code that you got?

Would any of our other readers like to try signing up, or not? It might be interesting, although I can guarantee it's risky.

View Thread (4)

RE: Login doesn't work

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:09:09 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-17-07 02:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by Markus (0)

To Drooler (156):

Drooler my login work without problem! :-p

View Thread (4)

FC Nudes Comment

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:47:55 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-17-07 01:47pm

COMMENT by Drooler (156)

Login doesn't work

I just signed up, but when I get to the login page, it asks for me to type in a security code, but there's none displayed! I can't get into the site.

And, yes, I have cookies enabled.

This is flaky at best. I recommend that NO ONE sign up for this site until this problem is fixed. I'll keep you posted.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: George's Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:16:18 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-09-07 04:16pm

REVIEW REPLY by littlejoe (11)

To George (0):

please put more effort into the reviews

View Thread (3)

RE: George's Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:33:53 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-09-07 03:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To George (0):

"best softcore site I have ever seen!"
WHY? Make some effort George... (especially if you want to get a point)

View Thread (3)

RE: George's Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 15:08:23 PDT

FC Nudes (2)

04-09-07 03:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (146)

To George (0):

Just a question:
The preview video seems heavy on air-brushing - does that go for all the videos?

View Thread (3)

RE: George's Review

Thu, 05 Apr 2007 15:57:47 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-05-07 03:57pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To George (0):

Well..I don't say the price is high, or the content is bad. I am just pointing that I could provide such a review not being a member. Your review is just to poor and all the information you provided I can get looking at homepage. Get it edited :))

View Thread (3)

RE: George's Review

Wed, 04 Apr 2007 15:04:38 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-04-07 03:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by littlejoe (11)

To King (27):

yup unfortunately seems that way...

View Thread (3)

RE: George's Review

Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:01:37 PDT

K Package Pass (2)

04-04-07 02:01pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To George (0):

Seems to me George like an advertisement :/. I bet I can find all this info at the home page.

View Thread (3)

RE: Not As Advertised

Fri, 09 Feb 2007 23:03:51 PST

K Package Pass (2)

02-09-07 11:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by roseman (234)

To albertlongyang (0):

thanks for the information

View Thread (1)

K Package Pass Comment

Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:45:48 PST

K Package Pass (2)

02-09-07 04:45pm

COMMENT by albertlongyang (0)

Not As Advertised

If you read their write ups on what they have you think you going to join a real good site. Well, it ain't so, Vids are very limited Pics are pick one, backup pic another, hell, everyone has better ways like slide shows. Thumbnails are so tiny that doesn't help. I think now they are all talk and not worth the money or time. Sure wish I had read the reviews before joining. Take from me or waste your money and time. Also you don't get all the sites they list, it's one site with several categories. All in all, it's a cheap site.

Visit K Package Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: fonzie's Review

Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:55:41 PST

K Live Cam (0)

02-08-07 04:55am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (234)

To fonzie (3):

According to the review, site seems bad :-/

View Thread (1)