PU - Kteam Enterprises Ltd. - All Activity

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:02:24 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 07:02am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

I totally forgot about the Lexa aliases (foolish)...but just hit her on EBI - here she is Melisa with one 's'..... have you browsed her anywhere else as Melissa...? (Now I hunt her anywhere, ho, ho).
Thanks for the hints on SweetAndNude and Hegre.....(got some fine sets from MetArt).

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:44:17 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 06:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

There are plenty of Melissa's around, and Lexa's, too, but when I see "the butt" attached to the name, I know immediately who it is! And she's got such a sweet face, too!

I'll keep the ITC in mind. There's a slowly growing collection of her at SweetAndNude, too, that's pretty outtasite. Plus the MetArt, HegreArt, etc.

Yes, she's The Ultimate Czech Butt, and that's saying something!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Fri, 17 Sep 2010 05:52:34 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-17-10 05:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Just a BTW - ITC:

Have you seen the latest Lexa-update (Sep. 15.) - Lexa in a light blue dress at St. Thomas, the Virgin Islands - it's just, yes: 'wauw'.....probably the best full body vid/pixset I've seen in a long time - Lexa strollin' around stark nekid at this nice scenery - man, those hips, that ass - in my years of porn only British Misty McCain had such fine hips...so, yes, by all means ITC keeps getting better.

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Thu, 16 Sep 2010 08:24:18 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-16-10 08:24am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

'allo,'allo Ze Droolah
Took a look at that new site - nice models, very nice indeed. But one objection: Never been crazy about those pix-sets with 'no background' - and they seem to have a lot of it..
BTW: She Don't Blush - that's not grammatical right, is it - LOL.

TorridArt - good tip - just went back to that one for a look again - not bad, certainly not bad!
ITC - it was great in some ways - but...I seldom watch those many Gbs of download - a few ones, like Lexa, Zara and they did some fine vids of Lana Lopez which is miles away from any other productions...

Wished I had some news for you, but hanging low a bit on new sites - just went back and rejoined Babespotting - and it's well, well, well - not a big deal, really.

Cheers!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:26:16 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-15-10 04:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Hey Denner,
You might want to check out a new find I just got listed: shedontblush.com

It's kinda small, but the content looks good and it's all exclusive. You might want to put it on your back burner until it grows some more. And they charge in Euros -- so there won't be any of that "regional pricing shit." ;)

I've dove back into TorridArt recently. The photo quality has really gotten great. And it's only 19.95 for a month, in greenbacks, anyway. (Hopefully, they don't do that "rpS.") ;)

Read your review of InTheCrack. Too bad they don't do the backside like TorridArt does. If they did, I'd be gettin' a hand cramp for sure, with that fast typing and mousing and all. But ITC has just two approaches to the booty: full body or "I, the viewer, am a housefly passing over a fragrant valley."

Take it easy ...

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:32:16 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-15-10 08:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

'Lazy' - that's MY name....and Bro: hope you stayed clear of this site - hand cramp or not.
As I see the previews (thanks for that, anyway) - no exclusives at all..
On to better hunting fields!

View Thread (7)

RE: Just a thought

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 06:50:40 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-14-10 06:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Hey Denner! Como estas? (Sorry, I'm too lazy to deal with accent marks.)

My well-honed credit-card-number-typing fingers got itchy when I last previewed Kscans, a couple of months ago, but it somehow cleared up. (Maybe it was the hand cramp.)

I've also seen stuff elsewhere that has shown up at Kscans. One, for instance, is "Kya" as she's called at Nubiles, or "Helen F" at MetArt, peeling her bedclothes off in a big bed. That one has made the rounds.

"Advertised as exclusive" is about as reliable a statement as "It really works" or "The check is in the mail." I mean, it COULD be TRUE! ;-)

Best not to "Get two. Just pay separate shipping and handling."

View Thread (7)

Kscans Comment

Tue, 14 Sep 2010 05:30:18 PDT

Kscans (0)

09-14-10 05:30am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Just a thought

Now that this OLD Kscans is on the hot list with a new review at TBP:

The site has GOT to be updated and gone through improvements very seriously since Maggie gives an 82,0 score.
Have not been here for years - but I remember a time when some PUs (this one included) had different inputs - some even named it 'Kscams' - which (at that time) was well put.

Any PU there now?

BTW: Maggie very cautiously states:
'All content is exclusive (advertised as exclusive)'

Yes: ADVERTISED! - but browsing the previews: NOT exclusive - any of it!

Visit Kscans - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:41:22 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 07:41am

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To Capn (27):

I didn't say it but I also thought that the score was a little high for a site that you more or less say scammed you. I'm still waiting to see if what night owl says about the crecit card processor.

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:28:55 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 06:28am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To night owl (0):

Given the difficulties you have had re cancellation, which is a serious customer service issue, I am surprised you still rate the site so highly.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:18:49 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 06:18am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To night owl (0):

I've dealt with both of the payment processors listed for this site, ccbill and verotel, and I've never had a problem canceling free and clear. My advice is to cancel at the processor's site directly and not even bother with the links at the content provider's site.

I haven't been to Kscans myself for nearly 4 years. I've lurked there a bit since, but I'm just not into their kind of content (toys, butt plugs, mouth-to-tampon, etc.).

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:52:50 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-29-10 01:52am

REVIEW REPLY by slutty (92)

To pat362 (233):

I agree, any site with sketchy cancellation processes is a poor site in my mind and I would skip it. Although, I would skip it anyway given the content...

View Thread (5)

RE: night owl's Review

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:35:04 PDT

Kscans (0)

08-28-10 05:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by pat362 (233)

To night owl (0):

That fact that you had a very hard time cancelling is an automic pass for me. What credit processor did you use? They have verotel and CCbil listed on their join page. I've never had any problems with either. Strange that you did this review because I actually thought they weren't producing any new content.

View Thread (5)

RE: Old reviews say it's bad, any updated info?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:02:59 PDT

Kscans (0)

07-01-09 09:02am

COMMENT REPLY by GCode (99)

To exotics4me (431):

eww, thanks for the heads up. Just like you stated, their tour is quite well done and sucked me in. I hate sites that have bad practices and this is why I love PU so much, we can discern the good from the bad. While this site may not do the same as FC Nudes, just that the company did this with another site is enough for me to stray away. Great info exotics4me, once again.

View Thread (2)

RE: Old reviews say it's bad, any updated info?

Wed, 01 Jul 2009 06:12:15 PDT

Kscans (0)

07-01-09 06:12am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To GCode (99):

Hey GCode, I never tried this site because it is owned by the same guys that run FC Nudes. My review has probably expired of FC Nudes, but you can still check it out. To put it mildly, they over-exaggerate in their tours and once on their site as a member. I barely remember FC Nudes, but I do remember that the advertised something like 70 models including my favorite Eve Angel. I joined it. Got inside, the model list starts listing the models...no Eve Angel! I finally find her and click her picture. It says, "Coming soon". There was around 30 of these different models that were "coming soon", so there was really on 35-40 models available. It was probably the worst I had ever been duped by a site. I still didn't give them a 50, I believe a 59, but I really wouldn't recommend their sites unless someone posts and can confirm that they have improved their business practices.

View Thread (2)

Kscans Comment

Tue, 30 Jun 2009 22:08:46 PDT

Kscans (0)

06-30-09 10:08pm

COMMENT by GCode (99)

Old reviews say it's bad, any updated info?

I checked out the site and it appears to be presented well with some quality models and some content that I like (extreme spreading, speculum, etc) but everything about the site in reviews and comments are 2 years old. Anyone gimme some info that's been there lately or knows anything about the site recently?

Visit Kscans - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: A tip

Sat, 10 May 2008 10:38:24 PDT

Kscans (0)

05-10-08 10:38am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To bunnypu (0):

Well, bunnypu
This used to be a site in the "old days" where quite a lot af PUs had one remark:
Kscams

Have not (for the same reason) been there a while, so if you've joined, it'll be good to hear what's happening in general....

View Thread (1)

Kscans Comment

Sat, 10 May 2008 09:44:28 PDT

Kscans (0)

05-10-08 09:44am

COMMENT by bunnypu (0)

A tip

If you are thinking of joining this site don't get suckered into joining by the pictures of the models on their front page (the top six or seven are usually "future" content). Instead click on the "updates" link to see if your favourite model has had her content posted.

Visit Kscans - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: sisterhood's Review

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:43:38 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 01:43pm

REVIEW REPLY by JBDICK (20)

To sisterhood (1):

Hi sisterhood

one question. if you click the link to view the site...
just after half way down in the NICHE: ENEMA www.ENEMABOUND.com site, there is a blonde girl wearing a pink top...

Is she on the site or is she one of the previews girls that can't be found...

she looks foxy...a bot like that Russian girls Katarina with the Big Tits and dodgy teeth...Ding Dong

View Thread (1)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 07:13:05 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 07:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To jd1961 (95):

Either this guy is not for real (in the head) or some kind of "undercover agent for shitty sites".
Well, the trust score puts it in perspective - still it's waste of our time to have a PU like that....

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 06:57:14 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 06:57am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To bunnypu (0):

If not scam - it's close, very close!
A lot of PUs - included this one - has warned about this site/pass in the past.
Nothing is exclusive here and most preview is, yes - totally scam. The content is at best worthless.
The reactions from a lot of PUs should NOW make TBP consider the score of 82,0.
That score is like giving this pass a seal of approval.
BTW, bunnypu - give it a shot with a review here! It'll be welcome.

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 05:03:08 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 05:03am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

But if you dig deep, you'll see that he suckered the poor webmaster from Twistys into a long argument over him giving Twistys (2 hotlinks!) a 57 score. I guess I didn't notice it at the time, or I would have clued the Twistys (there's 3) webmaster to this shill.
You may add your reply here:

http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=3118

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:45:36 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 04:45am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To jd1961 (95):

Yes, it was a rather sickening experience, exchanging e-mails with this guy who's pretending not to be a representative of the company but just an ordinary user. I played along; wanted to see how well he could play the role without dropping little "tells" in his messages.

Lying tends to put people under stress because they have to keep covering their tracks, and the stress makes them vulnerable to slip ups. But his tracks were all over the place! LOL.

I must say, it was one of those times when the trust ratings really made a big difference.

Enjoy your crow, Markus.

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sun, 27 Apr 2008 02:52:43 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-27-08 02:52am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (218):

Yes... Like the great Markus:

TRUST USER? YES (0), NO (17)

This guy is the worst. He shills all these sites, and look at the score he gives the competition! LOL

http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=1257

View Thread (6)

RE: Where are the advertised models?

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:43:26 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-26-08 02:43pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To bunnypu (0):

The sites from this company are plagued with problems such as you describe. Just read the comments and reviews -- but skip the reviews that are obviously written by shills; there are several of those.

Frankly, I think those shill reviews should be wiped off of PornUsers with a strong industrial cleaning agent. They're an eyesore and they don't belong here.

View Thread (6)

K Package Pass Comment

Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:30:36 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-26-08 02:30pm

COMMENT by bunnypu (0)

Where are the advertised models?

Two major complaints about this site; Some advertised content is not available in the Member's Area and a serious mistake in branding some small-boobed, blonde as Kyla Cole! Tried to contact the Webmaster but no reply.

Visit K Package Pass - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Not exclusive/warning

Sun, 23 Dec 2007 15:29:45 PST

Euro Hot Babes (0)

12-23-07 03:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Funny, I saw the review on TBP and had just checked the site. THEN I noticed that it was from the "K-scam" lot and thought, "Oh."

Could it be exclusive content produced on that non-exclusive and notorious couch? Is it simply a popular style of couch that shows up in a lot of places? Wouldn't it be fun to have one, just for the hell of it?

I also love way the TBP folks sometimes say "seems exclusive." We don't want to be told that! We want to know if it is exclusive! DUUUhhhh!

View Thread (1)

Euro Hot Babes Comment

Sun, 23 Dec 2007 11:12:07 PST

Euro Hot Babes (0)

12-23-07 11:12am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Not exclusive/warning

I do not understand how Maggie at TBP can state "exclusive content".
The content are the famous/infamous orange couch-videos that has been around for years at MANY different sites.

And Euro Hot Babes is a part of this Kscans - or what quite a few users/consumers describes as Kscams....and again a part of K Package Pass that may be one of the more serious rip-offs in the bussiness.

Visit Euro Hot Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

Blow And Swallow Comment

Tue, 28 Aug 2007 05:54:47 PDT

Blow And Swallow (0)

08-28-07 05:54am

COMMENT by Mort (3)

Not what the name says!

I joined this site recently, and tried a few videos. The name of the site is totally wrong - there is NO swallowing at all (unless by accident), and as well the video quality and resolution is nowhere near what it should be at this price per month.
Very disappointing! Stay away.

Visit Blow And Swallow - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: exotics4me's Review

Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:06:29 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

08-23-07 02:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To exotics4me (431):

That little "oops" ruse about "accidentally" switching the numbers, here from 27 to 72 models on this site is not the first time I've seen it done. What a bunch of slimeballs.

View Thread (5)

RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 11:06:35 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 11:06am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

I certainly agree - and I still do not understand the rating at TBP for KScan.

Well, our fellow users can se other rating at PU.

View Thread (2)

RE: Poor quality

Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:43:50 PDT

Kerotic (0)

08-19-07 09:43am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

The KScan network or whatever it's called sure knows how to make things look yummy -- to the visitor. Once you see Lucy Stratilova laying on the bed, about to turn belly down for some "peacemaking," the mind starts to replay the credit card info.

I've bought into it 2-3 times myself, but it's always such a downer once you get in. The images are mostly really funky, with poor color control (orangey Sandy and Sophie, pinky Bambi, greyish Orsi, etc.).

And they tell you "we're not professional photographers." For $30?! What a cop out.

There's lots of sites, but it's like rummaging through a line of waste cans just to find something worth it. That was my experience, anyway.

View Thread (2)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:21:20 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

07-10-07 11:21pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To King (27):

Yeah, I will learn my lesson not to run and join every site that says they have exclusive Eve Angel content! On a side note, also watch out for their other sites, listed as K-Package network. There are some high reviews, but the high reviews are from the same ones who gave this site a high review. Probably the webmaster of K-Site's little brother or something ha ha!

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Tue, 10 Jul 2007 15:06:37 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

07-10-07 03:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To exotics4me (431):

Thanks. I would keep away from this site anyway :)

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 16:29:52 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

07-09-07 04:29pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To King (27):

The low score is because of the false advertising, and not just with me, but also with TBP. To advertise that I am getting 72 models, only to have 27 when I pay my money is a huge drop off to me. The only content that I will keep is the Anetta Keys, burnt out on Sandy from Clubsandy, Anette Dawn's is a lesbian scene that is about a 3 on a 10 scale in believability, every clip I've seen of her is better. The Sandra Shine content is decent, but nothing great. The rest of the models that I thought I was getting are not on the site. Which leaves me with 5 pic sets and 3 videos that I will keep. The pics are advertised as "large, hi-res" but are only 1024 on the high end, which is barely even average if that. The price on TBP says $39.99 before the TBP discount of $19.99, but if you go to the site without going through TBP it says $29.99 not $39.99, where they are lying to TBP like a grocery store does when they say, "Was $6, now $2" but you see it later for less than $6.

Everything about the site seems hokey. Including the messed up security code. Download speeds are below average too.

View Thread (5)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:30:17 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

07-09-07 03:30pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To exotics4me (431):

I read your review but I cannot understand why 55? You have 5 pros and 5 cons. It would make at least 75 :)

View Thread (5)

FC Nudes Comment

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 00:04:35 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

07-09-07 12:04am

COMMENT by exotics4me (431)

Warning!

I read the reviews of this site, which a few are really good, one lower one. So I checked the preview out. Wow, looks good, resolution on pics could be better, but the model selection looks like a who's who of Euro models. They are all there, Eve Angel, Anetta Keys, Anette Dawn, Sandy, Sandra Shine, Sophie, Angel Dark, Audrey Bitoni, and this list goes on and on.

The preview shows 72 models. So for $19.99, plus my favorite models all on here, this would be a good deal for me. I join.

Hey, wait a minute here. For some reason 45 of those 72 models have NO content. Good business practice says, "If it doesn't say SOON in the preview, it better not say SOON once I pay." As for their promise of soon. Drooler reviewed this site in April, they had 17 models, this is July, they have 27. Ten models in about 10 weeks.

Basic math tells me that means this site won't have all the models they advertise until next year! It is one thing for a site to post a "Soon" under a model who will be on the site within the month. But they have 45 models listed that they don't have ANY content of, and only 27 with content. There are few positives to this site, great Anetta Keys content, but that is about it. My review will explain that.

This site is employing the year 2000 tactics to fool us. Which prides me to say, I will join it again, in 2000. Hopefully those who read this won't fall for their false advertising. BTW, FC stands for anyone who joins it, F*cking Crazy.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: cooldaddy's Review

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 12:10:42 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

06-03-07 12:10pm

REVIEW REPLY by King (27)

To cooldaddy (0):

If you have none cons, why only 85? Should be 100!

View Thread (1)

RE: Jason LV's Review

Sun, 03 Jun 2007 10:07:00 PDT

Kscans (0)

06-03-07 10:07am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To Jason LV (0):

If only you could add some more info ...

View Thread (1)

FC Nudes Comment

Thu, 19 Apr 2007 11:49:25 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-19-07 11:49am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Problem in IE 7

The security code not appearing, which I described already, happened when I was using IE 7 (and Firefox 1.5, too). I tried it in IE 6 and it did work. Markus had said that it looked like I had a browser problem, which is true, although we might also consider the possibility that FC Nudes has an IE 7 problem. Sure did with me.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Markus's Review

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:34:00 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-18-07 06:34am

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

No, not really. ;)

View Thread (3)

RE: Login doesn't work

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:09:43 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-18-07 06:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Markus (0):

I've tried it in Firefox 1.5 and IE 7, in 1024x768 and 1200x800. Cookies are enabled in both with no restrictions. No security code displays.

I don't have this problem in any other sites that require typing in a security code.

Very mysterious!

View Thread (4)

RE: Markus's Review

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:44:58 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-18-07 02:44am

REVIEW REPLY by Markus (0)

To SnowDude (214):

The name of the site is FIRST CLASS NUDES and not FIRST CLASS HARDCORE!
Do you know what i mean? ;)

View Thread (3)

RE: Login doesn't work

Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:52:44 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-18-07 01:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Markus (0)

To Drooler (218):

my security code have 4 numbers and work without problems.
i think you have a browser problem

View Thread (4)

RE: Markus's Review

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:53:13 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-17-07 05:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

The fact that it includes hardcore is a bad thing?

View Thread (3)

RE: Markus's Review

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:44:06 PDT

K Package Pass (0)

04-17-07 05:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by SnowDude (214)

To Markus (0):

If you can't think of a "Con" per se, can you think of any ways the site could be improved? I think that's what folks are looking for in reviews.

View Thread (1)

RE: Login doesn't work

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:40:09 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-17-07 03:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Markus (0):

Well, Markus, the login page says, "Enter the Security Code as it is shown on the right." There is no security code showing on the right, as I've just reconfirmed seconds ago.

Tell me, how many characters long was the security code that you got?

Would any of our other readers like to try signing up, or not? It might be interesting, although I can guarantee it's risky.

View Thread (4)

RE: Login doesn't work

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:09:09 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-17-07 02:09pm

COMMENT REPLY by Markus (0)

To Drooler (218):

Drooler my login work without problem! :-p

View Thread (4)

FC Nudes Comment

Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:47:55 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-17-07 01:47pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Login doesn't work

I just signed up, but when I get to the login page, it asks for me to type in a security code, but there's none displayed! I can't get into the site.

And, yes, I have cookies enabled.

This is flaky at best. I recommend that NO ONE sign up for this site until this problem is fixed. I'll keep you posted.

Visit FC Nudes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: George's Review

Mon, 09 Apr 2007 16:16:18 PDT

FC Nudes (0)

04-09-07 04:16pm

REVIEW REPLY by littlejoe (17)

To George (0):

please put more effort into the reviews

View Thread (3)