PU - Cyber World Media - All Activity

RE: I want a job as a camera-man

Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:33:37 PDT

Busty Amateurss (0)

09-11-08 07:33pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheRizzo (19)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

LOL yeah sometimes its amazing what some photographers were thinking. I am sure they thought it would be a cool effect and something different. As long as its not a style that is constant thru out a whole site I am ok with a few "out of the box" things though. Sometimes they try things that work out great.

View Thread (1)

Busty Amateurss Comment

Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:44:14 PDT

Busty Amateurss (0)

09-10-08 01:44am

COMMENT by WeeWillyWinky (70)

I want a job as a camera-man

Opted for trial, so far so good. Lots of vids in various formats, though most of the material looks dated. Very dated.

Downloaded vid of Audra Mitchell, a shower/bath scene. Ignored the measly 490-ish bitrate and tried to enjoy the beautiful woman. Things are going along swimmingly until 11:42, at which point Audra rises from the suds and the camera does a slow tilt to the left and finally stops when the rim of the bath-tub is running *vertically* from top to bottom of screen, which means Audra's head is on the right of the screen, her hips on the left, so that we are now viewing Audra sideways, as if we have taken an axe-blow to the neck and our heads are lolling on our left shoulders. The perspective stays this way until 13:08, when Audra lies back down in the water and the camera slowly straightens out.

I'll admit the vid is five years old, but it still fascinates me. What possible reason could there be for the camera-man to inflict this kind of arbitrary silliness on the viewer? I can see how alternate points of view can be purposeful in certain contexts, like uskirts for instance, but in this particular case there is no reason to be viewing the model from such an angle. It doesn't make anything more interesting, all it does is cause over a minute of purposeless frustration and in this case it pretty much blew what would have been the best part of the vid.

I think its mainly about image: "If I tilt the camera this way, people will think I'm a real artist."

Visit Busty Amateurss - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Questions about the site

Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:01:51 PDT

Want Boobs (0)

08-04-08 02:01pm

COMMENT REPLY by ace of aces (108)

To Monahan (29):

thanks a lot for the info, i think i will spend my money elswhere :)

View Thread (2)

RE: Questions about the site

Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:03:13 PDT

Want Boobs (0)

08-04-08 12:03pm

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (29)

To ace of aces (108):

I just visited the site (not as a member) because I got an email offering me a join price of $10 per month. It has a total of 32 models with no indicaton of any more, and the sample clips are all LD (lousy definition) and have copyright dates of 2004 and earlier.

If the site is that stagnant (or if that's the best they can do in promoting their site...use old stuff and not even brag teases like "hundreds of big tit babes"), it sure looks like a loser.

On top of that there is no apparent interest in the site by PU members.

Based on all that I decided to pass. The $10 could be better spent on a lottery ticket, or a couple of Big Macs. I'd get a better return on my $10.

View Thread (2)

Want Boobs Comment

Fri, 30 Nov 2007 04:59:03 PST

Want Boobs (0)

11-30-07 04:59am

COMMENT by ace of aces (108)

Questions about the site

hello,
can anybody tell me something about that site, especially about the videos?

Visit Want Boobs - View Replies - Add Reply