PU - Petter Hegre Studio AS - All Activity

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Mon, 19 Dec 2011 08:31:53 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-19-11 08:31am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To fredv (1):

For the record, it should be noted that we've found User fredv to be associated with site Petites Parisiennes

View Thread (13)

Hegre Art Comment

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:25:56 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-11-11 05:25pm

COMMENT by RLane (2)

super-size pics

I had noticed on their new updates that some have 80 mega-pixels or 10000px, but is it really sharp when you zoom in on those resolutions?

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Mr Hegre has a new camera (or at least back)

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 17:21:36 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-11-11 05:21pm

COMMENT REPLY by RLane (2)

To otoh (34):

Yea, I noticed new updates have 10000px and that's an awesome way for a new subscription from me.

View Thread (1)

RE: tboy's Review

Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:43:03 PST

Hegre Art (1)

11-06-11 09:43am

REVIEW REPLY by Monahan (37)

To tboy (7):

Regarding the erotic nature, that's my beef with MetArt; sexy but the eroticism isn't there.

I'm curious if anyone has signed up for both and what the erotic heat level comparison would be.

View Thread (5)

RE: tboy's Review

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 03:09:54 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-16-11 03:09am

REVIEW REPLY by tboy (7)

To otoh (34):

Yeah actually both sites i've pondered in the past, £10 a month for PP looks pretty good and the lingerie tease looks pretty nice.

View Thread (5)

RE: tboy's Review

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:08:00 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-15-11 11:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by otoh (34)

To tboy (7):

I third that - and also, although I've never joined, this confirms what I figured about the content at Hegre Art - I generally like softcore but it seems a bit lacking in eroticism. If you're after something just a bit more erotic, my favourite sites are probably Breath Takers and Petites Parisiennes, which are both worth a look.

View Thread (5)

RE: tboy's Review

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:20:36 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-15-11 03:20pm

REVIEW REPLY by Cybertoad (77)

To gaypornolover (14):

Agreed outstanding first review !

View Thread (5)

RE: tboy's Review

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:53:49 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-15-11 09:53am

REVIEW REPLY by gaypornolover (14)

To tboy (7):

Welcome to PU, this is a very good first review, keep em coming!

View Thread (5)

Hegre Art Comment

Thu, 08 Sep 2011 22:45:53 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-08-11 10:45pm

COMMENT by otoh (34)

Mr Hegre has a new camera (or at least back)

I have mixed views on the style of Hegre Art - although technically good, I find it a little bland. But for the resolution fiends, I notice that in the past few months, sets are available at 80 megapixels. A closeup would probably reveal more detail than you could see with your own eyes!

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Mon, 09 May 2011 07:01:05 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

05-09-11 07:01am

COMMENT REPLY by fredv (1)

To lk2fireone (116):

Well, at least for me, it's not very much about quantity, but more about content. I don't really agree when you said "Because I think that Met-art has material that is similar to what is found at Hegre, and a lot more besides.", well it has indeed, but that kind of material they share, is precisely the kind of material I'm not interest into.
To be honest, here is my point, I'm interested in 3 kind of stuff :

- basic, hardcore, rough pictures, even if not beautiful, that's my 'instant_turn_on_pics'. For this kind of material i want something "in_your_face" material, I have a quite good collection of Suze randall Pics, old pictures from Hutsler Taboo, some stuff from Kink.com, 21th Sextury...

- I like also something much more 'arty', with beautiful lights, nice lingerie..., but I mean really creative in its framing or scenery, something that I can print out and frame proudly in my living room. I love Petites Parisiennes for that, there is plenty of very very beautiful pictures worth having them onto your wall, (and I have 6 large prints from this site in my home !), and just for that I don't mind paying a membership because if I had to buy art prints it will cost a LOOOOT more. But it's also sexy, fresh, french (of course, that point appeals me ! -i'm french-) and I love the whole concept, and the site is very fun to use, with good persons on the forum (Hello Otoh ;)

- And I'd love to have a good in-between : I mean really hot stuff shot with real talent, I thought X-art would fit because the photographer behind it, Brigham Fields, did something remarkable before but softcore, but after a few sets, it's always the same, and even if really well done it lacks creativeness (but it's my #1 in this particular category).
met-art, it's not enough titilliating for me, and not enough arty neither (well as you said, I didn't see all I may have gave up too fast on this, too much in_the_forrest or near_the_shore shots) and Hegre, he's somewhere in between met-art and x-art but with some very explicit stuff and some so-so with similar content...

I think you may understand better my point now... I'm still searching for my Porn-Art where there is REAL porn and REAL art.... quite hard to find...:(

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Mon, 09 May 2011 04:07:28 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

05-09-11 04:07am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To fredv (1):

I find Met-art much more of a "must-see" than Hegre. Or maybe I just mean that I appreciate Met-art more. Obviously it depends on personal taste, because some people will find little to like at either site, but I think that Met-art is much the better value because of the huge quantity of photosets, the different photographers that are on display, the endless number of lovely models, etc. And what is also important, is that Met-art is priced as low or lower than Hegre.

I read your Met-art review. I think you were overwhelmed by the sheer amount of material to look through, and that turned you off. Also, you stated that you didn't find any of the material erotic.

Perhaps you find the material at Hegre more to your taste. I did like some of the material at Hegre, but I found much more at Met-art that I really enjoyed.

I think you might have stopped looking at the Met-art contents before you would have found material that you enjoyed. Because I think that Met-art has material that is similar to what is found at Hegre, and a lot more besides.

But that's just my opinion. If you saw too much that you didn't enjoy at Met-art, then that seems to have spoiled the experience for you, just like eating something tasteless or unappetizing could spoil a fine meal (I'm trying to express a psychological idea about enjoyment or pleasure, and doing a lousy job).

Obviously, you are not a cat lover, because reading that Petra has 3 cats should have made you fall instantly in love with Petra and her photosets. I will agree that the Met-art videos can be extremely boring, I much prefer the photosets.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sun, 08 May 2011 23:04:22 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

05-08-11 11:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by fredv (1)

To lk2fireone (116):

well for me TBP gave a kind of 'absolute score' and that's true that Hegre in its category (nude erotica, clean, with young and pretty girls) is really a must see... At the condition to have an interest in that kind of category !! Of course if you expect to see hardcore gangbang or hairy girls next door, you'll be disapointed ;-)
And as often, people who score a website are either very upset or very happy about it, I think there is a bunch of folks who are actually members of Hegre and whose voice is not heard anywhere... because they are just normally happy with the content.
That's why it's fair and smart to have the two scores side by side, that helps a lot in choosing a website, and those two scores are very valuable each one for its category.

View Thread (13)

RE: Bumble B's Review

Wed, 28 Apr 2010 08:53:47 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

04-28-10 08:53am

REVIEW REPLY by adrenalinrush (5)

To Bumble B (1):

Short and clean!

View Thread (1)

RE: How do you get the tour?

Tue, 13 Apr 2010 06:08:49 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

04-13-10 06:08am

COMMENT REPLY by Jay G (63)

To messmer (123):

Ditto on always signing up for sites through PornUser/BestPorn links. Always get the best info and best deal that way!

View Thread (3)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 10:56:22 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 10:56am

COMMENT REPLY by Rick (Staff)

To Capn (27):

This is interesting and valuable information. I'm definitely taking notes. We can always improve and won't give up on that.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:54:09 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 09:54am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To RagingBuddhist (47):

Yes, 'Few videos' seems to be more of a recurring 'con' listed by TBP reviewers rather than anyone else.
I have never seen them list 'Few Photosets' as a 'con'.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 09:17:08 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 09:17am

COMMENT REPLY by RagingBuddhist (47)

To Capn (27):

If you do as I did, and look through a bunch of the reviews for photography sites, you'll see that very few people actually list a lack of videos as a con. Most of the lower scoring reviewers have taken off points for camerawork, repetitious content and other issues. That suggests to me that it's not a video fan versus photo fan issue and that people are fairly rating sites based on their niche.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:15:18 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 07:15am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To TheSquirrel (30):

I'm aware that we're never going to convince you that everything we do isn't based solely on monetary gain, but ...

I think you'll find that the reasons scores vary is that TBP Reviews are based on a more standard set of criteria whereas PU users score based on what they feel is important ... which varies from user to user.

You can learn more about the official reviews (and the scores) by checking the section labeled "The Reviews" of the TBP FAQ.
http://www.thebestporn.com/faqs.html#thereviews

If your theory were true, we'd never give any sites low scores ... sortta like a lot of other review sites. ;-)

Hope that helps some.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 07:09:57 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 07:09am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To lk2fireone (116):

A lot of sites, even 'softcore' push their videos in the tours.

I still think, over time, we will get greater polarisation of sites to either specialise in video or photosets.

There are already many exclusively video sites.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:48:10 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 06:48am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To TheSquirrel (30):

TBP earns money when members (and others) join thru their links. I have more faith in TBP reviews (which give a large number of factual details in their reviews) than in the reviews at most porn review sites. But the best source of information is the PU reviews, which are written by people who are, like us, actually paying for the porn they see.

PU reviews often have less factual details than TBP reviews, but the opinions of the site value are easier for me to understand and evaluate than the scores at TBP. I certainly don't agree 100% with all PU reviews, but the reviews can be useful in judging whether a site might be worth my money to join.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:38:54 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 06:38am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Capn (27):

The softcore teen glamor sites emphasize photosets over videos, although they are now producing more videos than in the early years (2003 and earlier). Today's videos are also better quality than in years past, in terms of resolution and other technical factors. Maybe one day the videos at softcore teen sites will even be interesting and worth watching.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 06:36:31 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 06:36am

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

Conspiracy theorist squirrel to the rescue - TBP marks higher because they earn money every time someone signs up through them. So it makes sense not to mark them too low.

View Thread (13)

RE: A matter of individual taste.

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 05:25:33 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 05:25am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To lk2fireone (116):

I think some of that may be the Video Clan v. the Photoset Clan.

TBP seems largely video dominated in its reviewing.
They count few videos as a minus.
PU have at least an element of Photoset Clan in evidence, myself included in that.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (13)

Hegre Art Comment

Sat, 27 Mar 2010 03:46:24 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

03-27-10 03:46am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

A matter of individual taste.

More than most softcore teen glamor sites, Hegre seems to make people respond in different ways, from loving the site to finding the site a bore. The PU score for the site is 77, while the TBP score is 92. That is quite a range.

VideosZ has a PU score of 75 and a TBP score of 92. VideosZ is a hardcore video site, instead of a softcore glamor photo site.

But I think it's interesting how some sites seem to polarize the members at PU.

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: User1234's Review

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:59:43 PST

Hegre Art (1)

02-02-10 02:59pm

REVIEW REPLY by adrenalinrush (5)

To User1234 (3):

True, but doesn't convince me.
You find me somewhere between Widdyguy and JBDICK.

View Thread (4)

RE: User1234's Review

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:53:40 PST

Hegre Art (1)

02-02-10 02:53pm

REVIEW REPLY by User1234 (3)

To adrenalinrush (5):

Sorry pal, but I'm a real user. And I'm sorry you disagree with my review, but we're all entitled to our own opinions.

View Thread (4)

RE: User1234's Review

Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:47:48 PST

Hegre Art (1)

02-02-10 02:47pm

REVIEW REPLY by adrenalinrush (5)

To User1234 (3):

50% is bullshit! Something I really don't like about your review is the additional push for a signup and the significant personal comparism with Met-Art.com. *If I could, I wouldn't give you a trust because of that.

It's right that most of the girls are natural beautiful but somehow Peter managed to create the worst galleries ever of them.

I am a big fan of Linda L aka Yvette Blance and was shocked seeing some of her sets there. Peter did this to a couple of other models too.

In technically perfect terms of Mr. Hegre's skills as a photographer I disagree with (fake) user1234 and say the images could be more in line with the natural beauty of the girls and consistant in quality.

View Thread (4)

RE: Does the tour give the right impression?

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:34:04 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-12-10 12:34pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks, Drooler!

View Thread (5)

RE: Does the tour give the right impression?

Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:03:39 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-12-10 12:03am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To messmer (123):

The best I've been able to do with most Hegre material is to group postings by what the apparent shoots were over time in order to combine stripping with full nudity. It's a chore, but kinda fun, too. And it doesn't always happen.

View Thread (5)

RE: Does the tour give the right impression?

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:04:30 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-11-10 04:04pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks Drooler, I was just about to ask if there are any sets where the model starts fully clothed and then slowly strips. I couldn't find anything but nudity (breathtakingly beautiful as it was) on the tour which would not be my cup of tea.

I don't mind a soft core site but it is essential for me that the models start out wearing at least something.

View Thread (5)

RE: How do you get the tour?

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 15:26:11 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-11-10 03:26pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Khan (Staff):

Thanks, Khan. And I only use links from here to sign up with the various sites. I like those "special discount" notices. :-)

View Thread (3)

RE: How do you get the tour?

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:05:38 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-11-10 11:05am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To messmer (123):

No, you didn't miss anything. It looks like the webmaster provided a "special price link" that goes directly to his signup page. We'll touch base and see if he can't include a link to the tour.

In the meantime, you can check the tour using:
http://www.hegre-art.com

... just be sure when you're ready to sign up, you use the link from here for the special price. There's an outside chance that'll require you to dump cache (temporary internet files) and any cookies associated witht he site. But you probably won't need to do all that IF you've visited first from one of our links.

View Thread (3)

Hegre Art Comment

Mon, 11 Jan 2010 10:02:30 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-11-10 10:02am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

How do you get the tour?

All I get through both PU and TBP is the sign-up page with no links to a tour or samples of the site. Is there something I'm ignoring?

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Does the tour give the right impression?

Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:40:08 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-10-10 03:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks for the clarification, D.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (5)

RE: Does the tour give the right impression?

Sun, 10 Jan 2010 15:30:03 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-10-10 03:30pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Capn (27):

There's a ton of full nudity, but also some sets of the girls stripping. It's a mix of indoors and outdoors; there's plenty of both. You can peruse the galleries extensively or see what's on offer for individual models.

Sometimes the shoots are broken into separate postings, some stripping and others fully nude. And in some, though not as many, the girls remain clothed. But it's hardly like a tease site.

View Thread (5)

Hegre Art Comment

Sun, 10 Jan 2010 14:01:09 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-10-10 02:01pm

COMMENT by Capn (27)

Does the tour give the right impression?

I am guessing lots of beaches, skimpy clothing, a bit 'arty', not much explicit nudity?

Photoset orientated?

Are there many indoor sets?

Do they include full strips, meaning fully clothed to full frontal nudity?

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: User1234's Review

Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:33:22 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-08-10 07:33am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To User1234 (3):

A nicely detailed review.

I think you have probably scored it a little on the high side though.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (4)

RE: Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:13:17 PST

Hegre Art (1)

01-04-10 06:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by Monahan (37)

To shroom (2):

I just checked.

The Hegre Art site accessed directly is offering monthly at $29.95 and annual at $150.00

PU link offers 1 month for $19.95 (renewed at $29.95 after the first month) and $99.95 for 1 year.

If you like Hegre, the PU one year offer is far better at 27 cents per day compared from Hegre's 41 cents per day

View Thread (5)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:38:39 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-04-09 03:38am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To nutcrackr (8):

I've been passing up on several of the more recent sets. Take the Suzie Carina "Pink" set today. Pretty ordinary, as you say, and I've got a huge stock of this girl already with some really nice sets.

The site's a real mixed bag of sometimes hot, too often not. Lately, more not than hot.

View Thread (6)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Fri, 04 Sep 2009 03:14:15 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

09-04-09 03:14am

REVIEW REPLY by nutcrackr (8)

To Drooler (218):

Just an update. I've been a member of this site for about a year now and I visit it even less than I was when I posted this review. When I do visit sometimes I open up some sets but am usually pretty disappointed by the content.

In a recent video of the Mexico Shoot Hegre talked about photography and what his aims where. He talked about playboy being so fake and something he hated and wanted to produce something much more real.

I'm not sure how his thoughts align with the sets that feature a bland monotone backgrounds, fetish items and sterile poses. If anything I can't help by think some of the sets are just like a portfolio, surely the audience wants something more engaging?

I haven't changed my mind, I won't be renewing my subscription. I only hope Anna S makes more sets at Met-Art and less at Hegre-Art ;)

Keep in mind I still think his photo quality is very good, clean, crisp. It's just what's in the photos that I find pretty ordinary.

View Thread (6)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sun, 07 Jun 2009 23:22:57 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

06-07-09 11:22pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To nutcrackr (8):

Hegre is a poor man's Galitsin!

View Thread (6)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:29:38 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

04-16-09 02:29am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To nutcrackr (8):

I agree it has gotten boring. Not always, but too often. I was on a year's subscription, which ended, but I'm biding time before I go back. It's a shame, because the site has so many pluses, but it doesn't matter if the content isn't interesting enough.

The boredom factor is one reason why I wonder how much longer the site will go on.

As for their forums, they should either deal with it (listen, respond, take action) or not have forums.

View Thread (6)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:50:55 PDT

Hegre Art (1)

04-16-09 12:50am

REVIEW REPLY by nutcrackr (8)

To Drooler (218):

Well they seem to have toned the fetish stuff back. Which is good, however I still am finding a lot of sets extremely boring and void of any life or soul compared to other sites like met-art or errotica archives. Recent one "Jane french lingerie" Is 59 images of near enough the same photo, good model standing against a white background with basically two different camera positions.

What might be even worse is they basically censored my comment about it being boring. Previously they were getting quite a few negative comments in that section, I guess they decided to delete many of them and paint a false positive opinion of the sets.

All I know is at the current rate I will not be subscribing again. Anna S is hot but not worth the full price alone.

View Thread (6)

RE: nutcrackr's Review

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:04:10 PST

Hegre Art (1)

02-14-09 12:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To nutcrackr (8):

I think you sum up well what has been going wrong with the site, particularly what you say in the final paragraph of the bottom line.

That fetish stuff has got to go for sure. Back in the days when they had regular sets of Marketa Belonoha, Sophie Paris, Divinity Raye (but different name at Hegre), and Katie (from Brazil), they were certainly better.

But even the stuff they do of Anna S and Orsi doesn't show enough sensuality, IMHO.

View Thread (6)

RE: Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Mon, 08 Dec 2008 04:27:55 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-08-08 04:27am

COMMENT REPLY by shroom (2)

To lk2fireone (116):

Well, it's 19,95$/mo (or 99,95$/yr) if you come from PU/TBP. And that's a pretty good deal if you like HA.

Now if you hit the "Join" button directly from HA, then the monthly price is... 39,95$ (and 150$ for a year). I wouldn't consider joining HA at this price.

View Thread (5)

RE: Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:29:25 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-01-08 09:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by hondaman (7)

To lk2fireone (116):

It is possable that the world fin. situation might have some effect though one would have to take a look a several years worth of traffic to see what the trend is. It could be possiable that we are seeing the drop that occurs from people who join a site only for a few mounths then leave I am sure for all sites ther must be a peak couple of mounths that they have the most members. Of course the other thing is that Alexa.com meassures the traffic that goes to the entire site not just one part of it for example only 7% of people went to Met-Arts member area while the rest went to tour areas or to those pages that show several pic from a photoset. It does look like the traffic is higher in the summer time though maybe more people are members then. Of course porn as a whole is a multi billion dollar industry just in the United States so Id say pretty safe to say that most of the big name sites will do just fine in the long run even Playboy magazine has had some ups and downs over the years. Though even playboys web site is about 600 spots lower than Met-Art I guess a few people could take a few days and look up most of the sites listed on PU and see what the traffic levels are it would be neat to see what site has the highest rank on the whole web traffic wise. And to compare one site to another traffic wise that could cause some heated comments; "Street Hoes is better than Corner Sluts" oh really well according to the traffic levels Corner Sluts has 75% more traffic per mounth!" Ha ha I can see it now.

View Thread (5)

RE: Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:49:54 PST

Hegre Art (1)

12-01-08 11:49am

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To hondaman (7):

I looked at the traffic rating site you mentioned.
There has been a large drop-off over the last 6 months in viewers for the pornsites I checked:
Met-art
Metmodels
Hegre-Art
Domai
glamdeluxe
justteensite

For most of the sites I checked, the traffic dropped around 50%, which is a huge percentage. These porn sites must really be hurting.

This is related to the poll that surferman started, asking, "Do you think the current financial recession will make porn providers change the quality or price of their sites in any way?"

This is real proof that the porn sites have lost a huge amount of business over the last 6 months.

Over a 1 year+ period, the traffic dropoff has been even worse, in some sites as much as 66%.

Met-art has around 5 times the traffic of Hegre-art, so I guess subscribers do recognize the better value of Met-art over Hegre-art.

View Thread (5)

RE: Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Sun, 30 Nov 2008 01:48:44 PST

Hegre Art (1)

11-30-08 01:48am

COMMENT REPLY by hondaman (7)

To lk2fireone (116):

yep very true there is a website traffic ratting site used by webmasters(I wont name it but it is very accurate) on this site it will give you trafic info for damn near any site out there and it shows the traffic in a chart from for several years now Heargeart has been on the whole losing traffic and it is way below any erotic art site copmetion perhaps why they charge more?

View Thread (5)

RE: Not going smoothly.

Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:41:01 PST

Hegre Art (1)

11-27-08 03:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Horndog (0):

CCBill is considered one of the most reliable billing agents for porn.
If you have any membership problems you should first contact the site you joined. Problems logging in should be handled by the web site you joined.

If you can't get satisfaction from the web site, then you should ask for a refund from CCBill.

I belonged to Hegre-Art with a 1-year membership, and I never had any problems logging in.

But maybe there was a temporary server problem.

If your log-in problems persisted over several days, I hope you were able to get a refund thru CCBill.

View Thread (1)

Hegre Art Comment

Thu, 27 Nov 2008 15:26:57 PST

Hegre Art (1)

11-27-08 03:26pm

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Pricing at Hegre-Art.

Three of the most important factors in site value are:
-content quality
-content quantity
-price

Like hondaman, I think price is a major factor.

Hegre-Art is a good site, as far as content. But it's way overpriced based on the prices from a few months ago.
Prices for Hegre-Art have dropped recently.

PU currently lists a monthly cost of $19.95, recurring at $29.95/mo.
PU currently lists an annual fee of $150.00 (non-recurring)

The Hegre-Art site currently lists a sign-up fee of:
$19.95/month, recurring.
$99.95/year, non-recurring.
You almost need a dynamic link to these sites to get the updated prices.

Visit Hegre Art - View Replies - Add Reply