PU - Boutique Media - All Activity

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:01:42 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

07-20-08 09:01am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To exotics4me (301):

exotics4me wrote:

"Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them."

messmer's reply:

Yep, that's why I believe a very short review of any site is next to useless. Because every user's taste is so different, (I love hair and have just resubscribed to ATK Natural and Hairy) it is important to give as many details as possible about the contents of a given site.

Quality is very important but the contents are even more so because you might find yourself stuck with a site for a month (or three) that you find terribly boring. Happened to me a few times, Twisty's and ATK Galleria being two recent examples. They are quality sites, most people love them but they couldn't have been farther from what I was looking for. :-) So thanks again for making it so clear to folks about what to expect. Hope new reviewers will read and follow your lead.

View Thread (3)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:04:03 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

07-19-08 09:04pm

REVIEW REPLY by exotics4me (301)

To messmer (24):

Hey messmer,

Thanks, I had a similar review for the Abby Winters site last year. They're both really good sites, and I would hope that my review shows others that like glam porn, that they might not like this one, just like I would hope your review shows those that don't like glam porn, that is the site for them.

I will tell you a few of the girls I really liked on this site. I thought Pam, reddish/blonde hair was really cute, nice body too. Luna has a great body. Loved Lili and her red hair and freckles. Bridgette reminds me of Erica Campbell and my two favorites were Fluer and Lola. Those girls really caught my attention, especially Lola.

The thing that bothered me though, as much as I dislike lots of pubic hair, if the girl is pretty enough, I can deal with it, but hairy armpits are something that I've never been around, ever. That almost goes into too shocking for me. And several of the g/g sets had girls with hairy armpits.

Not that I think there is anything wrong with it, but it just doesn't fit my ideal of a fantasy woman. I will check that one out that you mentioned, made a notepad note here.

I remember talking to Snowdude last year about the areas we were raised in, and I was raised just outside of Los Angeles, beaches, blondes, bikinis everywhere I looked. So, I do like "regular" girls as well, as a contrast to my raising. One of my strongest fetishes is a woman in a long skirt with a tight sweater on, since I never saw women like that growing up. So, I can appreciate this site for the niche it is and as mentioned in the review, I really do applaud them for sticking to it.

Thanks for the tip on the Rachelle and Page videos and the reply. Will let you know how I liked them.

View Thread (3)

RE: exotics4me's Review

Sat, 19 Jul 2008 15:56:09 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

07-19-08 03:56pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To exotics4me (301):

A fair and detailed review, exotics4me, even though I gave the site a much higher rating. But that's where individual tastes come in and that's why I appreciate reviewers like you. You give all the pertinent details and will steer those who share your taste in a direction more suitable for them without knocking a site that's not quite your cup of tea. BTW, not sure if you will feel the same way I do, given our differences but while you are there download the g/g video (three parts) of Page and Rachelle (could be listed under Rachelle and Page). Rachelle's orgasm is the most realistic I have ever seen in all my porn travels. She's awkward, inexperienced with women, and so genuine and appealing that I marked the three segments: do not delete! :-)

View Thread (3)

RE: messmer's Review

Fri, 09 May 2008 06:55:57 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-09-08 06:55am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To WeeWillyWinky (70):

Thanks, www. I think one of the sites selling points for me is that it is so different from the others. A raunchier Abby Winters as I wrote in my comment way back.

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 17:55:03 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 05:55pm

REVIEW REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (70)

To messmer (24):

Good review. I might check it out in the future.

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 12:13:38 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 12:13pm

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (7)

To messmer (24):

Currently A memember of AbbyWinters, I did the special they where offering

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 11:31:21 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 11:31am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To williamj (7):

You're welcome. Hope my taste won't let down your taste. :-)

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 09:43:08 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 09:43am

REVIEW REPLY by williamj (7)

To messmer (24):

Its on the radar for later this summer. Thanks for the great review.

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 09:01:38 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 09:01am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (24):

"A Studied Casualness", good term - yeah, that might not be up my alley, but I'll have to check it out none-the-less. I'm certainly quite used to casual style in videos, I'm just usually less of a fan in photos. I guess, I won't know for certain until I browse the site for a while. Thanks for all the info :-)

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Thu, 08 May 2008 08:07:35 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-08-08 08:07am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To Toadsith (48):

You are making many good points, toadsith and I agree with most of what you say. When it comes to GOW I'm convinced that it's no accident that a video will show the videographer hand the model a bottle of body lotion while she's doing a slow strip, or to see her knees and feet as she is laying down for a shot from a floor angle. Is it laziness, I just can't be bothered to edit out these scenes or is it by design? As I said, I think it's by design (a continuing theme) that's why I keep referring to the site as "raw" for lack of a better word. A studied casualness?

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 19:08:53 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-07-08 07:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (24):

Thanks for the clarification - it validates my estimation of the content from their preview pages. I thoroughly understand how you've tired of the "perfect" model look, it can get boring. Years ago I was a member of both MET Art and Hegre Art (back when it was called the Hegre Archives) with year long subscriptions to each. By the time the year was up, just about the last thing I wanted was to look at another glamour girl posing in a window. So I joined a few ATK sites, and that was a nice departure from the glamour model look.

As for the technical aspects of the photography - I guess I'm a bit of stickler about that. A number of people like the poor photography that sometimes shows up on Suicide Girls (which I've been a member of off and on for years) - it always drives me nuts. It isn't just a matter of the photos being crisp and throughly in focus - modern autofocus is so superb that the camera will handle that just fine as long as there is even remotely enough light. An old Sony I had actually projected a laser matrix in front of it and would autofocus in nearly pitch black.

Even with "grit" porn, I expect a certain artistic focus. So you want to do aggressively unorthodox photos and put the photographer's feet in the photo? Fine - but make that style a continuing theme throughout the site. In the preview photos I see photos that could use much color balancing, plus others with washed out colors, flash shadows and so on. Many of the photos look like they want to be smoother, they just aren't.

If you want it to be gritty - photograph it at high ISOs. Throw various objects in the extreme foreground that we have to look past. Give us bizarre angles, like overhead or underneath shots. Photograph using just the on camera flash - or light the scene with a TV. There are tons of fun ways to look amateur while being professional - I just get frustrated by content that looks professional with some amateur seeping through.

Frankly, early Hegre Art stuff had a lot of that problem, he has come a long way over the years. I don't know how young Girls Out West is - maybe they too will improve with time, or maybe they know what they are doing and it just won't ever be quite to my taste. I'll join at some point in the future and try it out, a number of the models do look rather interesting.

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 18:33:10 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-07-08 06:33pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (24)

To Toadsith (48):

I believe that the technical skill is there and is being used, toadsith. The difference is that they make no attempt to create art. It's a "raw" site and to someone like me who is tired of very beautiful models shot in very tasteful poses it is a breath of fresh air. The photography is crisp and clear, so technically there is absolutely nothing wrong with it. Esthetically maybe (feet of photographer showing etc.) but I'm tired of aesthetics. That's exactly why I wrote what I wrote. Perfection turns me off these days, I see too much of it in another very highly rated site that I subscribe to and which I have visited about three times since the beginning of last week in order to check their updates ... without finding anything to download. All those gorgeous teenies in all their blandness. I wish that, in their case, I had stuck to my usual "subscribe for a month routine" because I have two more months of Barbies left. But, to use the old cliche: chacun a son gout! That's why I hope I made it crystal clear in my review what the site is all about. I wouldn't want to mislead anyone into subscribing to a site that goes totally against their taste. Just to stress it again: the models are mostly ordinary next door type girls/women (I hope I won't insult them with that remark) but that is exactly their attraction for me. Keep in mind that this review is coming from the pen of a guy who wouldn't know a Jenna Jamieson if he tripped over her and judge accordingly. :-)

View Thread (10)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 07 May 2008 15:15:54 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-07-08 03:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To messmer (24):

Looks like an interesting site, I may have to check it out sometime in the future. Though it appears to have the same basic downfall of the amateur style that Abby Winters has, many cute models but very, very few beautiful models. At least as far as the photos they put in their tour.

The photography also appears to be sub par in technical skill when compared to Simon Scans or Abby Winters (in my opinion the big two in this genre) and your description seems to confirm this. (Am I right about that?) Still, photo shoots with less of an agenda can sometimes capture some very interesting moments. Plus, the site does seem to have a huge variety of models - more varied than either of the aforementioned sites - so that is appealing.

View Thread (10)

Girls Out West Comment

Tue, 15 Jan 2008 12:02:09 PST

Girls Out West (6)

01-15-08 12:02pm

COMMENT by messmer (24)

Excellent Site!

A comment rather than a review because, looking back at my previous efforts, I find that in my initial rush of excitement at having found something unusual I tend to give sites a higher rating than they deserve .. in my subjective opinion, of course.

My first impression of GOW is WOW: Abby Winters with spice! I couldn't find glamor and I love that! The models are of the next door, amateur variety and if some aren't as pretty as many might prefer they are fine with me because of their very ordinariness.

When it comes to posing there's no coyness on the part of the model nor attempt by the photographer to create "artistic" nudes. The poses and talk are often raunchy. It is an anti-pornography site (according to Annie, the webmaster/mistress) because it shuns the artificial glamor (glistening, tanned bodies, fake overblown breasts etc.) of most porn sites. I know that when it comes to a preference to see natural girls presented in a natural setting I'm with her all the way and wish her lots of success. I know it is the first time that I am actually tempted to commit myself long term to any site. The next week or two will tell!

BTW, one extra bonus for me: the picture sets are huge and for once many pics have been taken in a "landscape" format which I prefer. This allows me to weed out the "portraits" and still end up with a continuous set taking the model from fully clothed to completely naked. But, as stated, that's MY bonus, you may not care.

Visit Girls Out West - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: jake07621's Review

Thu, 24 May 2007 04:07:27 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-24-07 04:07am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To supermikey9 (0):

FYI ...

The TBP Editor has now added the site so after you've checked it out, you can write a review at: http://www.pornusers.com/review/naughtybody/

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Wed, 23 May 2007 22:09:29 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-23-07 10:09pm

REVIEW REPLY by supermikey9 (0)

To Khan (Staff):

hey thks for the input guys... I'm gonna join... looks like they put up some new pics of gals ... i let u guys know

supermikey9

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 11:38:51 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-22-07 11:38am

REVIEW REPLY by jake07621 (40)

To supermikey9 (0):

I'm not familiar with that site. Sorry.

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 05:41:50 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-22-07 05:41am

REVIEW REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To supermikey9 (0):

I have asked the TBP editors to take a look at naughtybody.us If it qualifies, they'll get it listed w/in the next few days but no telling how long it'll take for an express review.

View Thread (5)

RE: jake07621's Review

Tue, 22 May 2007 04:42:54 PDT

Girls Out West (6)

05-22-07 04:42am

REVIEW REPLY by supermikey9 (0)

To jake07621 (40):

hello,

I was surfing and came across a site i was thinking of joining .. Can u tell me any information on it ?? naughtybody.us

m

View Thread (5)