Porn Reviews by the People. http://www.pornusers.com/site_company.html?id=83 Copyright © 2007 Ranks.com, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved. pornusers_20244 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20244 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/barelegs/"><img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/barelegs.jpg" alt="Enter Bare Legs" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/barelegs/"><b>Bare Legs</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 05-15-08&nbsp;&nbsp;03:33pm</td> <td><b>COMMENT</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile.html?id=2706">asmith12</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_activity.html?id=2706">86</a>)<br> <br> <b>Random Site comment</b><br> <br> This comment has been inspired by poll of May 15, 2008 on<br /> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.pornusers.com/browse_polls.html</a> . For this purpose, I've took 10 completely random sites to see if there are chances they're "unethical". <br /> <br /> Review of non-member pages: not much to say, no even tour page, promising DAILY updates (I don't believe it, do you?), and as a final touch, they're proposing "Join for free" combined with one of infamous PRE-CHECKED offers by Epoch (auto-renewing at $39.95 or so). That's what I call unethical. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.barelegs.com"><b>Visit Bare Legs</b></a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=20244">View Replies</a> - <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_add.html?id=20244">Add Reply</a></td> </tr> </table> <br> Thu, 15 May 2008 15:33:36 PDT pornusers_14081 http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13983#14081 <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr valign="top"> <td align="center" width="190"> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/handsex/"> <img src="http://www.thebestporn.com/logos/handsex.jpg" alt="Enter Hand Sex" width="158" height="135" border="0"><br> </a> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/review/handsex/"><b>Hand Sex</b></a> (0)<br> <br> 12-27-07 11:47am </td> <td><b>COMMENT REPLY</b> by <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_staff.html?id=13">Khan</a></b> (Staff)<br> <br> To <b><a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster.html?id=3250">joeshmoe</a></b> (<a href="http://www.pornusers.com/profile_webmaster_activity.html?id=3250">0</a>):<br /><br /> From our site facts, this site is all feeds. At the time TBP Editors verified the members area it wasn't a gay site. We don't currently have access to the site to verify this claim one way ot the other. We obviously wouldn't want to intentionally mislead anyone and will try to get access to the site soon and verify it's content. <br> <br> <a href="http://www.pornusers.com/replies_view.html?id=13983#14081"><b>View Thread</b></a> (1)</td> </tr> </table> <br> <br> Thu, 27 Dec 2007 11:47:25 PST