PU - Teen Stars - All Activity

My Precious Virgins Comment

Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:13:37 PST

My Precious Virgins (0)

12-15-11 09:13am

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Resolutions

Would anyone know the resolution sizes? The TBP and UP reviews don't mention the sizes, but that there all high quality.

Visit My Precious Virgins - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Slightly misleading preview pages.

Fri, 11 Feb 2011 18:16:54 PST

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

02-11-11 06:16pm

COMMENT REPLY by TheSquirrel (30)

To lk2fireone (116):

I'm afraid this is now more a rule than an exception. It makes PU all the more important. Good spot, IK.

View Thread (1)

Teen Stars Magazine Comment

Tue, 08 Feb 2011 02:11:54 PST

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

02-08-11 02:11am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Slightly misleading preview pages.

The preview pages for Teen Stars Magazine shows updates/photosets for models dated 2010 and 2009. But the thumbnails for the photosets are old photos that are probably 5 years old or older. You might get the idea that this site is still updating. But my best guess is that this is still an archive site, which has not updated or added new photos or videos in years. I'm basing that on the fact that the site did not update for years, and that the photosets in the preview section, although dated as 2010 and 2009, were probably shot 5 years ago or more.

Also, a lot of these models have suddenly changed citizenship from Eastern Europe to USA. I wonder if immigration is aware of all the models that entered our country by the Internet?

Finally, many of these models have been 18 years old for many years. I thought I was the only one who had discovered the secret of staying young. But this porn site has an amazing number of models that have stayed 18 or 19 for years and years.

Truth in advertising. As consumers of porn, we must be confident our porn sites are diligent in their search for truth and justice and the American way of life. Hi-yo Silver (I ride along with the Lone Ranger).

Visit Teen Stars Magazine - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Site needs some work

Tue, 02 Nov 2010 03:48:24 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

11-02-10 03:48am

COMMENT REPLY by tangub (103)

To bibo (0):

Thanks for the info, what you've provided in the comment and reply here could easily have been put in to a review without much extra effort...those are the facts most of us want to know re updates, picture, movie quality etc.

View Thread (3)

RE: Site needs some work

Mon, 01 Nov 2010 11:45:09 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

11-01-10 11:45am

COMMENT REPLY by bibo (0)

To Denner (227):

According to the update history, the last movie was added in February 2010 and the last picture set was added in June 2010. They seem to have pretty big gaps in between their updates from time to time.

Yes, it´s definitely more a photography site than a movie site. I`m not a big fan of picture sets, but to be honest, I´ve seen better quality on other sites. Images are often photoshopped (which is a no-go for me) and some sets are lacking variety.

After surfing the site for a couple of hours, I spotted a few more glitches and bugs. No big deal, but annoying and it confirms my initial statement, that this site needs a rework. It´s just sloppy and poorly coded.

As for the review, I never wrote a review and I don´t know if can be bothered. I think my comment contains all the crucial points, so people can form their own opinion without my score.

View Thread (3)

RE: Site needs some work

Mon, 01 Nov 2010 07:30:49 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

11-01-10 07:30am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To bibo (0):

Thanks for head-ups here - been a member a couple of times - but loooong time ago!
According to the latest PREVIEW there certainly is NOT much updates in vids here - and what I can see from that preview all material is still licensed - and can be found elsewhere...

Once (also some time ago) the Drooler mentioned that this site primarily is for pix sets - guess it's still the case?

Do you plan a review? - if so - look forward to it...

View Thread (3)

My Precious Virgins Comment

Mon, 01 Nov 2010 06:36:15 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

11-01-10 06:36am

COMMENT by bibo (0)

Site needs some work

This is a pretty good site with lots of high quality content. I joined the site because of the movies.
However, the navigation is quite uncomfortable and needs some work.

1. The picture and the movie part of the site are completely separated. If you look up a model on the picture site, you only get links to the photo shootings. There are no links to the movies of the model.

2. All movies are split up into 3-8 parts and you need to downlaod them separately.

3. All movies have the same filename (high01.wmv etc.), so you need to rename them!

4. Download speed seems to be capped at 2 MBit/s, you can download more than 1 file @ that speed though.

5. Some movies are tagged as HDV 1080 but are in fact only 1280x720 resolution.

6. The actual HDV 1080 movies are 1440x1080

7. The movie page does NOT have a page navigation (page 1 2 3 4 etc). You just have a next button and the back button of your browser.

Bottom line:
A solid site with good content but some inconvenient elements.

Visit My Precious Virgins - View Replies - Add Reply

My Precious Virgins Comment

Sun, 11 Jul 2010 07:34:26 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

07-11-10 07:34am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

They say they're updating, but ...

they're not! I mean they post for visitors that their latest update is July 11, 2010, today. Actually, they haven't posted an update since June 3rd.

I hadn't been to the site for a few months, but decided to rejoin. Finding the problem, at first I gave it a little time, just to see if there was a glitch.

They're aren't many updates since February of this year, btw. And the site has maintenance problems such as full-sized pics where there should smaller ones in some of the model pages, making the layouts a screwed-up mess of scrolling vast territories of white space and huge image files.

If they're no longer updating, THEY SHOULD SAY SO! Then they wouldn't get called on it.

Visit My Precious Virgins - View Replies - Add Reply

Real 8 Teens Comment

Wed, 30 Dec 2009 07:17:21 PST

Real 8 Teens (0)

12-30-09 07:17am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Update on membership price.

I see prices that are different from the PU/TBP prices for membership at Real 8 Teens (which includes membership for Teenage Depot as well).

Monthly: $29.99 (recurring)
Monthly: $39.99 (non-recurring)

PU/TBP lists the prices as:

Monthly: $24.95 (recurring)
Monthly: $34.95 (non-recurring)

Visit Real 8 Teens - View Replies - Add Reply

My Precious Virgins Comment

Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:52:46 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-08-09 12:52am

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Who likes to keep logging in?

You log in to the site. You choose a model, and you're asked to log in to her page. You choose a gallery, and you have to log in to that. Then you click to download the zip and ... you have to login again to get it. While it's downloading, you switch to another page and ...

Ridiculous!

Visit My Precious Virgins - View Replies - Add Reply

Shana Dreams Comment

Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:27:38 PDT

Shana Dreams (0)

10-04-09 11:27am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

Worth a 1-month membership or not?

Shana Dreams last update was apparently October 04, 2007 (exactly 2 years ago). Any PU member ever join this site who can give an opinion whether the site is worth a 1-month membership? The site is small, very few photos and videos, but has a few cute models.

Visit Shana Dreams - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:49:03 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-14-09 09:49am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

I haven't been to NewSensations since late last year. The downloads are quirky, meaning you might have to try more than once to make one work, but the material I got was really hot. It's a network, with some sites still updating and some not, but for $14.95 (TheBestPorn price) ... (hope they wouldn't pull one you with the exchange rate).

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:44:11 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-14-09 09:44am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

No, friend - your're not repeating, at all.
And, oh yes - just yesterday I browsed thorugh Mikes Apartment - and just because on this special site I thought about rejoining Reality Kings...even if those fine euromodel-stuff is kind of ruined by all that talk - but you can't win them all.
But: Any new deals/stuff on NS? - have not been there (browsing) for quite some time...

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:55:59 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-14-09 08:55am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Have you been to Mikes Apartment lately? Great hardcore and it's part of a network. Or maybe NewSensations? Sorry if I'm repeating any earlier recommendations.

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:36:58 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-14-09 07:36am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Not sure, Drooler - found one called Rookie Babe (no big deal) - but this site - well, I ran away pretty fast - no video-downloads - just inbrowser - but still the models looked fine, real fine.....wonder if the site will "mature"...

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:57:30 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-13-09 12:57pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Yes, MetArt's pretty much the sine qua non for pics. I've been scrounging about, too. Just did a trial of PaulMarkhamTeens. Went through 7 months of old, recycled (but freshly dated!) content. Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel! Had to take a 4-hour nap after that. Gettin' old! ;)

Hey, have you checked out the new Rookie Babes? It's in its Grand Reopening (or should I say "Gland Reopening") with big sized, exclusive pics.

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:01:29 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-13-09 09:01am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks anyway - been through most of My Precious Virgins - not the greatest experience - I think we've seen somethings a lot better than here - both in videos and photosets...
So I thought about AA - again - but before we all run out of money for new sites/experiments - what's left in those kinds of deals???
And BTW - still looking at MetArt - cannot find much better out there concerning fine photosets.....

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:50:59 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-13-09 08:50am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

I haven't been to AmourAngels since mid-March. I was actually very disappointed, too. Maybe the vids would have been good (?). I also tried to find Kristi at both AA and MyPrecious, but couldn't. Sorry.

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:37:09 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-13-09 08:37am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Just for the heck of it - or what the words are here?
Found the most fantastic video (out there) of a petit blond with great tits - original from Amour Angels - of a model called Kristi and the name of the video is "Fanfare of Life"...
Are you by any change at AA at the moment?

Or any other PUs?

Well, once in a while you find some extrodinary stuff - and this video is it!
Still, I'm somewhat uncertain about this old site which is related to the kind of stuff we go for - so any hints/tips about AA from your point of view???? (Thought about joining, but has to look at ALL those sites I still have to pay for....too, so.....)

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:49:52 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-11-09 12:49pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Hey Denner,
Believe it or not but I'm a current member. ;)

The big problem is that they only show the current and next update, but there's no archive of updates per se.

So as a member you have to keep checking back every day -- which might not be a problem. But as a returning member, you have to check the archives of many of the models to see which ones got updates, AND have filed the ones from your last visit by the set numbers (e.g., Portia 01) or know when you last quit.

And the zips are colossal while the server is pokey. It's like loading up a mule with 300 pounds of gold bars. Tsk-tsk! Yah!!

These days, at least, they've been doing the photo updates on closer to a daily basis. Used to be more hit-and-miss. And the models are pretty darn hot. My favorite, I think, is Shaina. The most recent set of here is, well, DAMN!!!

But their Erica, who just updated today (aka Angelica, etc. etc.) is a really cute one, too. ETC.

Have fun!

View Thread (10)

RE: Anyone member at the moment?

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:13:31 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-11-09 07:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Denner (227):

A follow-up - just joined.
First impression:
Still some great teens with exclusive photosets

Site/Browsing very disorganized (only model-search in sitemap without photos, only names (who can remember all those?)
Video-files divided (for most) - and VERY large.

Also some very large zip-files for photo-sets - came across one that was 592 MB!!!! - for a zip-file!!!!

Be back with a review

View Thread (10)

My Precious Virgins Comment

Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:03:19 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

06-11-09 05:03am

COMMENT by Denner (227)

Anyone member at the moment?

This is one site with easturo girls/teens I've never joined - mainly because they did not have videos in the start (thanks for that warning back then, Drooler).
Now it seems different - though judging from the lastest preview those video are NOT exclusive (most at least) as stated at TBP-review.
And I got to agree with one of the newest reviews - by nu1234 - that it is a disapointment that the video-actors do not follow the model-list - and that the vast majority of the girls/teens from the photosets has no videos. (That's why sites like Pixandvideo and the earlier 1ByDay is/was great - they have it)
Had it been so here, this site could be in the upper 90th - because the girls at a lot of the photosets are simply stunning - and strangely enough some not seen/or very rarely at other sites.
But bottom-line:
Any hints about quality of the lastest updates and NOW in general.

BTW: Could NOT join via main billingco. (Segpay) - and at CCBill thay still got the shitty currency-deal...

Visit My Precious Virgins - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: nu1234's Review

Tue, 26 May 2009 17:08:25 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

05-26-09 05:08pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Drooler (218):

I'm more soft core than hard core. If the girl is attractive enough, I don't mind looking thru a "taking nothing off" photo set.

I was just looking thru some photo sets I downloaded from Teen Stars Magazine years ago. Isabella, Maria, Nicole and Rebecca are some of the models I can look at, whether they are nude or not. They are just good-to-great looking girls. Their photo sets are also at My Precious Virgins, where they also have the same names as at Teen Stars Magazine. It's easier when you don't have to list a model under different names, like you sometimes have to do at met-art.

And even tho the photo sets are not as high quality or artistic or artsy as the met-art photos, I can enjoy the photos of these girls as much as the met-art photo sets. Simple can be nice, for a change.

Sometimes I find myself almost drooling over some of these girls. I have to remember to keep my mouth closed. Lol.

View Thread (3)

RE: nu1234's Review

Tue, 26 May 2009 16:38:07 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

05-26-09 04:38pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To lk2fireone (116):

I've recently rejoined and while there are still those "take nothing off" photosets, sometimes they can be useful as aperitifs to the nude ones.

I did have to spend about 7 months away before I felt like rejoining.

One girl there who really hit me like a laser was the blond Shaina, who finally, in the third photoset, gets naked. (The first works as an intro.) She's just really sexy!

And most of the time now, at least, those older non-exclusives are just history and the newer stuff really is new. (One exception is Dona in the kitchen, set 06, which originally was at either TeenCharms or TeenStarsMagazine. But at least it's higher quality images this time.)

View Thread (3)

RE: nu1234's Review

Tue, 26 May 2009 16:24:11 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

05-26-09 04:24pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To nu1234 (0):

Sorry you seem to be disappointed with the site contents.
If you read the earlier reviews at PU and TBP, they indicate the main focus of the site is soft core teen.
The earlier reviews also state the number of vids at this site are very limited, compared to the photos.

My only quibble with the TBP reviews would be where two reviewers give a + mark for exclusive content. As Drooler noted in his review, a lot of the photo sets were earlier shown at other sites, such as Teen Stars Magazine.

But you have to admit there are a huge amount of yummy-looking girls here. So the site is not a complete waste.

View Thread (3)

Teenage Depot Comment

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 02:18:27 PDT

Teenage Depot (0)

04-22-09 02:18am

COMMENT by lk2fireone (116)

No updates since 2006

Looking at the tour pages, last update was December 2006. With small number of models, limited number of photo sets and videos, it's very questionable why anyone would want to join this site. Since the site owners apparently have some other small sites that stopped updating years ago, they should combine the different sites into a single, larger site, or offer the different sites as part of a network, instead of trying to sell the sites on an individual basis or as a 2-for-1 combination.

Visit Teenage Depot - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:15:43 PST

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

01-15-09 02:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

"Ethel and Martine: practically worth the money (to join) just for these two beauties."

You totally missed the point.

In no particular order:
Isabella, Maria, Nicole, and Rebecca are the real reasons to join Teen Stars Magazine.

Although I must say there are other great-looking models on the site as well.

View Thread (1)

RE: A Decent site

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 21:32:09 PST

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

11-05-08 09:32pm

COMMENT REPLY by WeeWillyWinky (88)

To Jeffrey99 (27):

Agreed. The vids are useless but the pictures are top-notch, and the girls are beautiful. A good pic archive.

View Thread (1)

Teen Stars Magazine Comment

Wed, 05 Nov 2008 02:51:56 PST

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

11-05-08 02:51am

COMMENT by Jeffrey99 (27)

A Decent site

Both Teen Stars Magazine and Teen Charms were decent sites but as others have said, they haven't been updated in over a year with no information on if anything is coming or what happened.

The videos were pretty much crap but some of the photos are pretty nice quality. Decent site/price to get one months of pictures.

Visit Teen Stars Magazine - View Replies - Add Reply

Teen Charms Comment

Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:01:43 PDT

Teen Charms (0)

09-14-08 11:01pm

COMMENT by Yonda382 (0)

My experience

Having done the deal of two for one as well, Teenstars and Teencharms I comment the following:

I downloaded some 33 thousand pictures in a two-day or so flurry...

And what I can say is that the sets have exactly 'one' all encompassing 'redeeming' value that endures. Well and one good quality.

The set and setting with the time period is good. You can see it going over the sets.

The 'one' all encompassing value is that the photographer has a very pointed 'ass perspective' on life. This alone redeems the obviously 'dead' sites now rolling over in the grave of oblivion.

Some sets are corrupt and it is generally best to forget them after a second try. The sets are painfully repetitive shoots that look like frames from an old movie separated out. However, with regard to ass shots this is acceptable.

Otherwise, stay clear if you do not find this one aspect overwhelmingly desirous!

My opinion of course!

Visit Teen Charms - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Sat, 17 May 2008 07:50:30 PDT

Teen Charms (0)

05-17-08 07:50am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

Fine review there, WWW....
And I got to agree with all of your cons. - except mayby "softcore" - I dig that!
But this site is - as you mention - close to death - concerning updates.
Well, this is a US-based site for east-euro stuff and how: on license-basis.
BTW - the Drooler is abolutely right about the main content: photosets.
That's not my main ballgame and the times I've been at this Teen Charms, my joy has been quite limited....
But then again: It's good to get updated on these sites, thanks!

View Thread (2)

RE: WeeWillyWinky's Review

Sat, 17 May 2008 02:45:13 PDT

Teen Charms (0)

05-17-08 02:45am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To WeeWillyWinky (88):

If you haven't already, check out the reviews of My Precious Virgins. Some of the photo content from TeenCharms got migrated there, but there's a lot more as well.

Since I reviewed My Precious Virgins they've added some hardcore and some videos. They update slowly and erratically, too. But since you're a pic lover (as I am), I think you might like the site for the content that's already there.

But read the reviews here first, of course. ;)

View Thread (2)

RE: No More Updates

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:24:06 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

11-03-07 11:24am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Khan (Staff):

Hey Khan
Thanks a lot for the answer - even if it may take some time with the review. I got something to hold on to.
Might even take the chance myself.......well, probably I will.

regards
Denner

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 11:00:26 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

11-03-07 11:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (227):

Denner, the site is marked as a high priority for a review but even with that, given they're (the reviewers) current schedule, my *guess* is that it'll be at least a month and quite possibly a bit longer.

Sorry I can't pin it down any closer.

In the meantime, we'll hope that now the site is listed, someone who's already a member will post a review.

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:45:56 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

11-03-07 10:45am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Khan (Staff):

Well, new reply Khan...

Just wonder: Have you guys at TBP any idea when we can expect the first review of Sexy Goa. Am quite exited, but this time I have patience enough to wait to join till we have some sort of judgement from you guys.
Hope for the best - expect the worst (not from you, but about what this site is like)!

Regards
Denner

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:53:34 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

10-31-07 02:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Khan (Staff):

Great, Khan

Thanks for both answers....

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:35:54 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

10-31-07 11:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (227):

FOLLOWUP ...

sexygoa.com has been added. You can add your remarks at:
http://www.pornusers.com/review/sexygoa/

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:01:06 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

10-31-07 09:01am

COMMENT REPLY by Khan (Staff)

To Denner (227):

>> TBP take a look at that, please.

The best way to suggest a new site be added is to send the URL to:
Support [at] PornUsers [dot] com

It'll get passed to the TBP editors and barring any snags, is usually added w/in a few days.

In the meantime, I've passed sexygoa.com to the editors.

View Thread (7)

RE: No More Updates

Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:40:40 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

10-31-07 08:40am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To jd1961 (95):

Another good warning about this site.
Been there a couple of times - once had been enough.

By the way jd1961:
How you ever seen a review of a site called:

sexygoa.com ?

It looks pretty good. But the preview don't give you much about quantity and updates. Can't find a review anywhere.

TBP take a look at that, please.

View Thread (7)

Teen Stars Magazine Comment

Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:16:37 PDT

Teen Stars Magazine (0)

10-30-07 10:16pm

COMMENT by jd1961 (95)

No More Updates

It appears the last update came in July. In fact, there is an "upcoming update" for August that never came.

Visit Teen Stars Magazine - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 12:07:01 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-15-07 12:07pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

Yes, the timeout is annoying. Can't quit the page without being VERY quick on the draw with the old click-cancel-control-w maneuver; the login box just keeps popping back up! It takes a few "practice" tries before I finally get the slight of hand within the acceptable range of milliseconds!

Our "Helen," the boy-next-door's babe of naughty dreams, is starting to show up, but so far there's only one set.

I'm not sure but I think they might have just added more girls in the middle areas of the updates. I just discovered "Yolka," as she's known at JustTeenSite, as "Leisha." Cool yet smoldering, and a very nice butt!

View Thread (2)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 15 Oct 2007 05:23:02 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-15-07 05:23am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

Thanks Drooler for a great review.

And what a fine selection of models known and some new (to me anyway). Looks really good in the preview.

But a bummer, that there are no video .... and the thing with the timeout seems totaly out of place.

View Thread (2)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Sun, 14 Oct 2007 06:09:54 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-14-07 06:09am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To exotics4me (431):

I think it was "Savannah On Trial" or "Savannah Superstar"

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Sun, 14 Oct 2007 05:15:35 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-14-07 05:15am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (431)

To jd1961 (95):

I can't remember the name of this one, but there was one that had Savannah, remember her, gorgeous blonde that committed suicide? I rented it, she was in it at the end talking about being a porn star ha ha. Not naked, fully clothed.

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:13:24 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-06-07 06:13pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To exotics4me (431):

That's a really important point. If such sites were musicians, they'd be putting the same tracks on different releases and calling it "new" material. Sure the fans would love it.

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:02:17 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-06-07 06:02pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To elephant (47):

Actually, I have a few more FYI items to add about TeenDreams and TeenStarsMagazine, as it looks like MyPreciousVirgins is a kind of "repurposing" of that content (How's that for euphemism?), and maybe from Real8Teens, too:
1. A fair number of photosets were non-nude, in fact. Stripping down to a thong, for instance.
2. Light was inconsistent. More light in some pics, then suddenly dark, dark pics, then sometimes lighter ones again. Really unprofessional! Seemed like the photographer was just trying different light settings. Didn't happen just once. It was a regular problem!
3. Not all pics were as big as 2000px. Some were 1280! Some were over 3000.

Wouldn't be a total downer for pics, but it might mean a lot of perusing around.

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Sat, 06 Oct 2007 04:37:33 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-06-07 04:37am

COMMENT REPLY by elephant (47)

To Drooler (218):

Cheers Drooler for the extra comments on image quality. Yeah I have seen some pics on teenstarmagazine and were good quality but have heard the site has gone downhill. Maybe this is the same quality I don't know, still theres alot of photos. would probably join if TBP did a discount for say $19.99

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Fri, 05 Oct 2007 19:36:21 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-05-07 07:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To exotics4me (431):

yeah, that's the way it used to be in the old VHS days. You'd find a tape with a hot girl on the boxcover called something like "Teenage Cheerlesders In Heat" and when you got it home, it would be a bunch of old hags in cheerleader outfits. Porno will never change their PT Barnum approach it seems.

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:10:16 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-05-07 12:10pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To elephant (47):

You're right about those sites being all nude so much, although Hegre has been doing more that start with clothes lately. And some of those END with some clothes still on.

The stuff I saw on TeenDreams and TeenStarsMagazine were kind of a mixed bag of all nude or stripping to nude. The image quality in general wasn't as good as those other sites, and sometimes the fuzziness or lack of light was a real problem.

View Thread (9)

RE: About that word ... "exclusive"

Fri, 05 Oct 2007 06:53:17 PDT

My Precious Virgins (0)

10-05-07 06:53am

COMMENT REPLY by elephant (47)

To Drooler (218):

Yeah never joined either of them other two sites but this does look tempting. I do get bored with all the nude sites out theres, I much prefer to see girls in clothes to begin with in photoshoots and maybe a bit of flashing before nudity. Most sites just have girls naked from the off and it gets a bit boring set after set of nudity. girls can look sexy in clothes too, just my opinion. MPL Sudios seem to do some sets with their models in clothes to begin with which is good, MET art, hegre, just teen etc it tends to be rare thing.

This site does look tempting indeed, wish though some of these euro nude sites did also hi quality vids too with just filming the girls been natural. I like the way atkpremium.com with their behind the scenes vids and interviews, also like hegre vid idea of filming nude girls on a island. Some of alscans too is great vids that are different.

View Thread (9)