PU - Only Tease - All Activity

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 23 Dec 2011 16:15:55 PST

Only All Sites (2)

12-23-11 04:15pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To roseman (253):

Very nice to see the welcome return of the enigmatic Roseman! :0)

I do hope we shall see you around here regularly again.

To comment on the detail of your review, I am surprised and disappointed to see that not only do you reckon the package is expensive, but they also have the gall to charge you again for content!!??? :0E

Well out of order, IMO.

All that & no nudity! :0/

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:59:24 PST

Only All Sites (2)

12-23-11 08:59am

REVIEW REPLY by roseman (253)

To Denner (227):

lol, you are quite funny. You have to understand that my reviews focus on the technical side of the sites :-)
But if it is not helpfull I won't review any more sites.

View Thread (3)

RE: roseman's Review

Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:23:08 PST

Only All Sites (2)

12-23-11 08:23am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To roseman (253):

Good to see you back here.....and again with a fine, no nonsense review...
What did trick you?

Anyway hope for more roseman reviews, inputs, comments ect. in the future - let's get some new/old blood back to this site.....let new things happen.

View Thread (3)

RE: Leggings

Sun, 11 Dec 2011 02:35:02 PST

Only Opaques (0)

12-11-11 02:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To RLane (2):

Probably. 'Only' sites are usually quite comprehensive in covering their subject matter.

The only thing they are really shaky on is their definition of 'nude'
It usually covers wearing clothing!

Cap'n :0(

View Thread (1)

Only Opaques Comment

Sat, 10 Dec 2011 20:18:23 PST

Only Opaques (0)

12-10-11 08:18pm

COMMENT by RLane (2)

Leggings

Would anyone know if there are any sets were the models are wearing leggings?

Visit Only Opaques - View Replies - Add Reply

Only Carla Comment

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:41:33 PDT

Only Carla (0)

10-30-11 07:41pm

COMMENT by dracken (213)

Quick Impresion

The site stopped updating back in 2009, although the archives cover about 4 years of regular updates. The images are in good quality with the highest resolutions close to 2000x3000.

The videos are very short and not really worth it, but several of the sets are petty hot.

Everything here is softcore and fits pretty well with the onlytease site theme. A lot of various outfits and stockings as well as corsets and some scenes with two girls (although not much touching or petting goes on between the two.)

Overall a decent site if you like Carla and a nice bonus to the onlyallsites membership.

Visit Only Carla - View Replies - Add Reply

Only Secretaries Comment

Sun, 30 Oct 2011 19:32:20 PDT

Only Secretaries (0)

10-30-11 07:32pm

COMMENT by dracken (213)

Quick impression

I got access to this site by joining onlyallsites, which also give access to onlytease.com. I'd say that this site is very, very similar (check out my review for onlytease if you want more details)

The basic idea is that they offer tons of images of gorgeous girls pretending to be secretaries. There is a strong focus on stockings along with various skirts, high heels and some more exotic outfits (airline attendant anyone?)

They have videos, but they are not great quality and there is a bit of repetition in the scenes since all the girls only do striptease.

The only major difference from the onlytease site is that they focus on a bit more business look here. although many girls have bright red stockings or dresses that would get you fired in many offices. There are also some sets shot outdoors or in a work out room so there is some variation.

A good site if you like glamor softcore, but make sure you read the reviews for only tease before joining, and make sure you truly want softcore images, otherwise Nubiles, X-art or first time girls might be better sites for you.

Visit Only Secretaries - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: tasha's Review

Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:17:05 PDT

Only All Sites (2)

10-12-11 04:17pm

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To tasha (1):

For me, whilst I really do love the tease, I also really need the pay-off.
The lack of full nudity on their sites is at the very least very frustrating for me, & in recent years a total deal killer.

As one of my buddies on here once memorably said:

'All sizzle & no steak!'

I think that succinct summation still holds good.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (2)

RE: tasha's Review

Tue, 11 Oct 2011 23:58:42 PDT

Only All Sites (2)

10-11-11 11:58pm

REVIEW REPLY by otoh (34)

To tasha (1):

Thanks for the review! This is a site that I've considered before, but always felt it would leave me wanting just a little more.

You seem to share my penchant for legs, nylons etc... take a look at my recent review for Foot Factory, it may appeal?

View Thread (2)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:29:58 PDT

Only Tease (4)

07-19-11 11:29pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To three3 (1):

This argument could go on forever.

I know perfectly well what they do, I am merely stating what I would like them to do.

It depends if you interpret tease as that or an abbreviation of striptease, which is the way I see it.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:11:20 PDT

Only Tease (4)

07-19-11 05:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by three3 (1)

To Capn (27):

Teasing is teasing... Which means... TEASING... Provoking... Of course it isn't meant to have full nudity all the time..

View Thread (16)

RE: alamop's Review

Sun, 10 Jul 2011 01:49:01 PDT

Only Tease (4)

07-10-11 01:49am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To alamop (5):

'99% of sets have no nudity.'

Much as I like the models & outfits, this is the big stumbling block.

For me over 90% of the sets would have to feature full nudity.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (1)

RE: Not Great

Fri, 27 May 2011 07:49:07 PDT

Only Opaques (0)

05-27-11 07:49am

COMMENT REPLY by Only Tease (Webmaster)

To tjsully (0):

As the owner of this site I feel compelled to respond to this comment and clarify a few pointers raised by the poster.

1) We go to a lot of effort in the sites tours to get across that the site content is very, very soft. We fully accept that this type of site is not for all tastes, but the name is a giveaway, plus the fact in the tour we hardly show any boobs even, and the text does state it is mainly topless. The art of the tease is not in what you see, but what you don't see but can imagine.

2) This user joined via the onlyallsites.com option, which gives access to all our 6 sites. Across all six sites we update with over 50 exclusive sets per week, and have a back catalogue of over 1.6 million images and 3,600 videos - all 100% exclusive. So it can hardly be said it is lacking in content (maybe lacking in content in his opinion of content to his taste!).

3) The way we operate is totally different to any other site. We are shooting new models each day, and rather than "hide" the sets we have waiting to be published to the members, we upload each set straight after the shoot, this way we also allow the members to make requests for outfits and clothing etc. As we allow the members to preview all the new sets as thumbnails, we also allow each member what we call Fasttracks, so they can select what unreleased content they want to see each month before it is released to the members area. We allow 10 FastTracks per month on OT, and 5 per month on the other sites. (and members can earn more FastTracks by posting on the members forums). We could of course operate like every other site, and the members would never know what models we are shooting and what content we have waiting to publish, but this way it is totally transparent and the members get input on the shoots. So when this user said he only got 5 Fasttracks, that was 5 for OO, but also additional ones for the other sites.

4) We have refunded the users subscription - we are a site of integrity and stick to our promises.

We realise OT and our other sites are a very focused niche on softcore teasing, and does not appeal to all, but for those that like stunning girls teasing, our sites are perfect. And nowhere do we try to say we are anything other than a very softcore site. People joining our sites expecting a lot of nudity do not view the tour properly.

Thanks for reading.

Paul
www.onlytease.com

View Thread (2)

RE: Not Great

Tue, 24 May 2011 09:22:12 PDT

Only Opaques (0)

05-24-11 09:22am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To tjsully (0):

Another example of what a venerable friend of mine once said of the Only Tease site:

'All sizzle & no steak!'

I am afraid it still holds true now.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (2)

Only Opaques Comment

Tue, 24 May 2011 02:12:11 PDT

Only Opaques (0)

05-24-11 02:12am

COMMENT by tjsully (0)

Not Great

I found this site to be lacking in content. Yes, the girls are beautiful, but they just stare at the camera and hardly take any clothes off until the last 6 shots or so. I understand this is a soft core porn site, but I see more when I go to work and the girls are drinking coffee and messin around.
I also would like to make the comment on something the site has called "fasttrack" which seems to be the newer of the photo shoots. You only get 5 per month, what up with that!
I signed up for the total access to their sites, with the cost of around $45, and I was disappointed for what I got.
I do want to say one more thing though, customer support, I did let them know that I was dissatisfied and they said that they would reimburse me for the money spent. Which is now pending. We will see.

Visit Only Opaques - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Getting more frustrated by the day ...

Wed, 11 May 2011 11:02:07 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

05-11-11 11:02am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

Yep! You know what really hurts? I only have a couple of favorite models and one of them is Faye Reagan. Guess who had a picture set in enticing lingerie in today's update (May 11)! And it is once again making her skin look plastic and was once again NOT downloaded by me. Sigh!

View Thread (4)

RE: Getting more frustrated by the day ...

Tue, 10 May 2011 11:13:44 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

05-10-11 11:13am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To messmer (123):

I suppose they regard that as the 'Art' part! ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (4)

RE: Getting more frustrated by the day ...

Sat, 07 May 2011 15:37:57 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

05-07-11 03:37pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To anyonebutme (14):

Thank you, aobm! I was beginning to think I was the only one who found all that airbrushing annoying.

View Thread (4)

RE: Getting more frustrated by the day ...

Sat, 07 May 2011 11:37:50 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

05-07-11 11:37am

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To messmer (123):

Yea, this site sure does lay on the airbrushing rather thick!

View Thread (4)

Art-Lingerie Comment

Sat, 07 May 2011 11:12:01 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

05-07-11 11:12am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Getting more frustrated by the day ...

It would be so easy to love this site. The videos are great, the girls are great, the lingerie is just what the doctor ordered, yet I look at set after set of pictures that are way too soft and lacking in detail even in High Resolution.

Many people will like this softness just fine but for someone who likes to see every detail of a model's face and body (as well as every fold and drape of the beautiful lingerie) this site is a huge disappointment. I just got finished looking at today's and yesterday's updates, drooled over the lingerie in the preview pictures and once again didn't download a single set for the above reason. I sure wish they would take the art out of this lingerie site. As usual, a purely personal and subjective opinion!

Visit Art-Lingerie - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 27 Apr 2011 14:35:35 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

04-27-11 02:35pm

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Mr Fountain (50):

Hi Mr. Fountain, in my experience Ultra High Resolution Pictures are usually extremely "sharp" otherwise their size wouldn't make any sense, at least in my eyes. Every single picture site I have belonged to, expensive and cheap, had crystal clear pictures with the exception of Twisty's (they might have improved in the meantime because the webmaster agreed publicly with some of the criticisms) and Only Tease. With the latter I must add "I think" because I didn't keep any pictures. I am going strictly by memory, and mine tends to be not so hot! :-) I was a member of ITC but frankly was more interested in their fabulous videos. Simonscans I have yet to try. Thanks for the tip!

View Thread (2)

RE: messmer's Review

Wed, 27 Apr 2011 13:06:16 PDT

Art-Lingerie (1)

04-27-11 01:06pm

REVIEW REPLY by Mr Fountain (50)

To messmer (123):

I like Onlyteases photos too...they only ask 24.95.and they deliver good photos. Since you are a sharp/ nude photo lover probably you'd like sites like inthecrack or simonscans. But Sharp usually entails a higher monthly membership price. Simonscans is 29.99 and inthecrack goes for 34.95. You may even like watch4beauty.

View Thread (2)

RE: Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 08:38:23 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-26-11 08:38am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Mr Fountain (50):

Yes, it all comes down to models levels with soft / midcore material.

Teendreams, I know & like.

I will take a look at Phil-Flash.

Thanks for the extra info.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (5)

RE: Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

Wed, 26 Jan 2011 07:32:47 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-26-11 07:32am

COMMENT REPLY by Mr Fountain (50)

To Capn (27):

well, given your response, I'd say simonscans.com would be a good fit for you; the models do get naked real quick- except they use toys.
or teendreams.com ; or Phil-flash.com -check out Bratty Brittney -the models are listed on left side of screen- and see how you like her..among these three i'd go with my third pick. Though, I'm going to have to check that site out again myself sometime.
OT is the right fit for me personally, though I have heard that nudity complaint a lot. But they get the models that don't want to go to full nudity though- but the plus side to that is -more models are willing to do this kind of work- have you ever noticed that OT seems to have an endless stream of models?

View Thread (5)

RE: Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

Sat, 22 Jan 2011 03:31:11 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-22-11 03:31am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Mr Fountain (50):

No.

What I am looking for hasn't changed in over 30 years.

Very simple.

Full strips from fully clothed to fully nude.
No masturbation, toyplay, gyno. or les.

It really isn't that difficult, but so often part of the sequence is left out or full nudity isn't reached, or toys appear too quickly.

There are some sites, but not many.

There are many sites so close that they really frustrate!

Onlytease is a prime example of that.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (5)

RE: Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:40:25 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-21-11 08:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by Mr Fountain (50)

To Capn (27):

Dang, I thought the same thing about two years ago... and I'm now an OT regular...just rejoining over and over and over again...It may not work for you...maybe ur looking for femjoy type site or something...

View Thread (5)

RE: Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:41:35 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-18-11 01:41pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Mr Fountain (50):

Yes, it is that same old bug bear for me.

The models sets & photography are great.

It just for me it REALLY needs the full fronal nudity pay-off every time.

Otherwise it only serves to frustrate, not satisfy!

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (5)

Only Tease Comment

Tue, 18 Jan 2011 06:46:01 PST

Only Tease (4)

01-18-11 06:46am

COMMENT by Mr Fountain (50)

Only Tease improves set design: adds behind the scenes photo sets

I have noticed that only Tease has improved their sets- not just the same old office set with the office desk and chair like it used to be- but some beautiful settings, pretty rooms, and furniture. Id say Only Tease has taken a step towards becoming a top of the line glamour softcore site!

OT has also added behind the scenes photo sets which they have'nt done before.

Also, I don't understand what the hang up is about OT not being nude enough. OT is a smoking hot site.

I would join this site 12 out of 12 times for each month of the year. I have never regretted my memberships- Probably I have been a member about 14 times.

Take this from someone who looks at every single models photo set because the models are so gorgeous and the outfits that they wear never gets old to look at. OT has one of the best collection of models for its genre that I've seen.

Take Carla for example- she has over 10,000 pics almost 100 sets! Thats a solo site in itself with just a OT membership- thats really generous..

Visit Only Tease - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: So frustrating!

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 09:20:12 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-27-10 09:20am

COMMENT REPLY by slutty (92)

To Capn (27):

I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree, tease to me doesn't mean striptease, it means tease.

I understand that you want the site to be a striptease site, but it is a tease site, and tease does not have to have a payoff.

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 08:27:56 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-27-10 08:27am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To slutty (92):

I disagree there.

Striptease, when performed properly involves a full ration of nudity.

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Sat, 27 Nov 2010 00:59:39 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-27-10 12:59am

COMMENT REPLY by slutty (92)

To Capn (27):

But Cap'n, tease implies lack of nudity... The name of the site isn't onlysexyoutfitstofullynude.com, eh? I understand that this is what you want, but that's just not what this site is.

While I understand your complaint, it seems similar to complaining that playboy.com doesn't have hardcore material (I assume it doesn't).

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 05:35:52 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-26-10 05:35am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To malikstarks (8):

Quite simple really.

I like striptease....but I have to have the full nude pay-off.

So many sites miss out important parts of a very simple progression.

I like the set to start fully clothed and slowly progress to full nudity, both coy & explicit, without going to midcore toys & gynacology.

I suspect Only Opaques will be similar to Only Tease in it's frustarting lack of full nudity.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Fri, 26 Nov 2010 02:39:51 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-26-10 02:39am

COMMENT REPLY by malikstarks (8)

To Capn (27):

I think the name of the site "Only Tease" is meant to be a hint.

I know I'm stating the obvious, but if so, I'm not quite sure what it is your hoping for.

Maybe you should try the other site "Only Opaques". Not sure but maybe that one has full nudity.

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:00:18 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-24-10 09:00am

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To Denner (227):

Many thanks for the support Denner.

I knew it wasn't just me!

HINT!! ;0)

If only some Webmanager would take a shot at doing this style of site but with a guarantee of a progression from fully clothed to full body nudity!

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Wed, 24 Nov 2010 05:53:34 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-24-10 05:53am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (227)

To Capn (27):

Alas.....they can call it 'tease' as long as they want - but this user, too REALLY miss that full nudity - 'tease' - or not.

Maybe - just maybe - this site has outlived itself - okay, you still got stockings, heels, very good looking models mostly ect. - but it's boring - to say the least - they keep on in the same track...

A pity - because it's not because those models do not want to do full nudity - a lot of the same models are in Babespotting.tv - which have that nudity.....

Try to renew yourselves at Only Tease....

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:27:12 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 07:27pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

Keep whingeing Cap'n! I like it. :-)

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:59:03 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 03:59pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To anyonebutme (14):

I don't. I subscribed once.

I whinge every so often in the hope something might change. ;0)

Cap'n. :0)

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:36:08 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 03:36pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To Capn (27):

Then don't resubscribe to the site.

No site is able to conform to all people's individual tastes 100% of the time.

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:06:01 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 03:06pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To lk2fireone (116):

Exactly so.

I do love the tease.

...But!

It is the lack of pay-off that gets me.

Cap'n :0/

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:53:33 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 01:53pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

For me the site was a grievous disappointment, not because it lacked full nudity but because the lingerie was generally so ho hum. I didn't even take advantage of their offer that lets one download 10 upcoming sets because I couldn't find a single one that featured anything of interest to me.

I freely confess, my taste is too specialized and outdated while this site caters to youth (under forty) with their pantyhose and stay ups and thongs etc.

From the whole month's subscription I saved about 8 videos (that I haven't even looked at yet) because they come reasonably close to my taste ... but sadly not close enough, and that's about it!

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:37:25 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 01:37pm

COMMENT REPLY by slutty (92)

To Capn (27):

Well Cap'n, seems like they keep suckering you back in... I have to admit there is one site that I always find very irritating, but still join like once a year. Don't know why I do it.

Personally I think tease can be pretty hot, even without a full-nude "payoff", provided it is well shot.

View Thread (16)

RE: So frustrating!

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:31:37 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 01:31pm

COMMENT REPLY by lk2fireone (116)

To Capn (27):

Maybe that's part of the tease (when they post a set as nude and it isn't).

More to the point: tease is strongly related to frustration or denial. You want something (nudity, a slow striptease, eroticism, sexuality) and it's slowly revealed or unleashed. Too much too soon and you lose the oomph, the longing, the desire, the slow, languishing buildup.

Tease can be a delight. But I also like to see the whole package (the nudity, or the sex, or whatever the payoff is).

View Thread (16)

Only Tease Comment

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:25:31 PST

Only Tease (4)

11-23-10 01:25pm

COMMENT by Capn (27)

So frustrating!

I know I have said this before but....

I do really like a lot of the models & outfits...

but there is nowhere near enough full nudity for me.

I wish they would get a handle on the true definition of nudity.
It is even more frustrating when a set is posted as 'nude' & it isn't!

Cap'n. :0E

Visit Only Tease - View Replies - Add Reply

Only Opaques Comment

Tue, 23 Nov 2010 12:03:50 PST

Only Opaques (0)

11-23-10 12:03pm

COMMENT by jsmits80 (4)

Good site!

Only Opaques (most if not all of this review also holds true for the sister site � Only Tease) is a great site but a potential member must understand that this site is strictly R rated. In my mind, if you are going to have a soft core site, every girl should be incredibly good looking. And on this point, Only Opaques really delivers. The girls are overall gorgeous! They all have super bodies and pretty faces, but most importantly: great legs!
But my biggest criticism is the lack of platform shoes! I would never try to speak for all leg/nylons guys but I would say that most guys who like legs/nylons also love super high heel shoes? True? I would just like to see one pair of 7-8 inch platform heels! There isn�t a single heel higher than 4 inches on the whole site! The girls often look like they are just wearing the shoes they walked to the studio in. The outfits they pick for the girls are pretty awesome. Lots of nice lingerie and slinky dresses. A couple too many girls in costumes for my taste. I just don�t find a girl dressed like Little Red Riding Hood in pantyhose very sexy. Also, a couple too many sets with girls in blue jean skirts, pantyhose and 3 inch heels that is just a little boring. The videos here are pretty good. My only criticism is that too many of the videos just have a model sitting on a couch moving around and not talking. I find this sort of unexciting and mundane. I want to hear the girl talk to the camera, tell me about her legs/nylons, talk about what she is thinking�
My only other criticism is with the very nature of a soft core site. Now, I know I am telling a tiger to change his stripes, but I wish they would turn up the volume one more notch. I wish there was just a bit more sex/nudity/exposure here. I am not saying I want the girls to be swinging on trapezes with cucumbers but can�t they show/do a little more? Maybe the way they get such hot girls is by not requiring them to do extreme stuff?
Overall, I would give Only Opaques and the sister site Only Tease very high ratings. They do have a ton of content and frequent updates. It is very easy to navigate and very attractive girls. If they would add some platform shoes and a slightly �higher sexual� level, I would probably give them the keys to my car! LOL!

Visit Only Opaques - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Very Disappointing!

Wed, 20 Oct 2010 07:19:04 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-20-10 07:19am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To anyonebutme (14):

I knew I'd get some negative responses to that one and you haven't let me down, young 'un! :-) I think I made it very clear, except maybe to the very densest, that I was being subjective and that younger folks would find more joy in this site and rated the site accordingly. My outrage (and downgrading) is in connection with totally inadequate videos being published as new updates. And that is NOT subjective, everyone should be outraged no matter how much they enjoy the rest of the material. A quality site just doesn't do that. For me the HD videos (again see review) were the only redeeming factor and now I found out that I can't even count on those on a regular basis.

View Thread (2)

RE: Very Disappointing!

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 23:39:25 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-19-10 11:39pm

COMMENT REPLY by anyonebutme (14)

To messmer (123):

Little harsh?

The site just is not to your personal tastes.

"Severely ripped off"? They are still pushing out genuinely new exclusive updates each day that a great many people enjoy.

Don't like the current day's update? Then download the next day's update! This site does allow you to do that, you know.

View Thread (2)

Only Tease Comment

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 11:10:36 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-19-10 11:10am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Very Disappointing!

This site didn't live up to my expectations right from the start, too many fully clothed pictures in a set, usually accompanied by a flash of the ubiquitous run-of-the-mill black lingerie with bare breasts as the reward if one lasted to the end of the set.

I had consoled myself to the fact that I had misspent my money by pretending to myself that I could at least watch and download their HD videos, even though they were not of the best quality, but to see TODAY'S video update presented in 640x480px AVI (Size of file: 50 MB!) and blurry even when not enlarged to full window makes me say: a pox upon their house! I feel severely ripped off! This is absolutely unacceptable in 2010.

Visit Only Tease - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:45:17 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-19-10 10:45am

REVIEW REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

This site is seriously starting to p... me off, Cap'n. I'm on my way to reduce my score even further. See revised review!

View Thread (6)

RE: messmer's Review

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 10:06:21 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-19-10 10:06am

REVIEW REPLY by Capn (27)

To messmer (123):

I know I have been banging on about this for years, but this site would be sooo much better if they consistently proceeded to full nudity in each set.

They have great outfits & models, and I appreciate that some won't do nude, but there are plenty that would & do.

A tease is no good without the pay off for me.

They have a very shaky definition of nude too, as some of the sets they claim to be nude aren't.

Cap'n. :0/

View Thread (6)

RE: messmer's Review

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:14:47 PDT

Only Tease (4)

10-18-10 07:14pm

REVIEW REPLY by mbaya (344)

To lk2fireone (116):

I did not see anything resembling bits or any real nudity. I felt the teasing was not all that well done either.

View Thread (6)