PU - 52 Company LLP - All Activity

Glamure Babes Comment

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:03:41 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-30-10 04:03am

COMMENT by tangub (103)

Old Content

Came across this site this morning while browsing a TGP and for a moment it caught my eye with their claims of "all exclusive Glamure Babes" and "most girls on our site Lithuanian" but on closer inspection of their latest updates on the tour page i noticed the update for September 20 looked rather familiar being from an Eve Angel bath set which i was convinced i must have downloaded from Eurobabez at least 5 years ago. Had to dig out my old HD to confirm i was right and sure enough the set was there. On mousing over the picture files the original file information comes up showing date picture taken 08/01/2003. Is anybody really fooled by their claims of "We worked hard at bringing you only the finest Lithuanian models all shot by professionals exclusively for our site. You will not find these girls anywhere else on the net" In fact most of the recent updates look like old recycled content i've seen elsewhere

Visit Glamure Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Change Of Name!

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 07:22:51 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-09-09 07:22am

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Drooler (218):

Well, in that case, I'll stop caring about their success, Drooler. Far be it from me to support even in a small way a junk site!

View Thread (4)

RE: Change Of Name!

Wed, 09 Sep 2009 03:08:11 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-09-09 03:08am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (218)

To messmer (123):

If it were only that simple. If you Google "Glamor Babes" (American spelling) you'll get glamourbabes.org and glamourbabez.com high on the list. That second one, with the deviant plural, makes me wonder if glamourbabes.com is already owned by someone else.

So it's not just spelling; it's domain name ownership. Could be that they invented "glamure" for that reason.

I was a member once when it was Baltic Babes. The new, Glamure site doesn't seem to have any new updates since then.

So, anyway, fuck it. ;)

View Thread (4)

RE: Change Of Name!

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:15:25 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-08-09 06:15pm

COMMENT REPLY by messmer (123)

To Capn (27):

Never thought of that, Capn, but you're absolutely right. Another reason to change the spelling or the name altogether.

View Thread (4)

RE: Change Of Name!

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:40:15 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-08-09 04:40pm

COMMENT REPLY by Capn (27)

To messmer (123):

It is not going to feature high on a search engine with that spelling. :0/

View Thread (4)

Glamure Babes Comment

Tue, 08 Sep 2009 11:26:24 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-08-09 11:26am

COMMENT by messmer (123)

Change Of Name!

If they don't change their name to Glamour or Glamor they'll never be known as a classy site. I sent them an email pointing out their error (Glamure) but who knows, maybe it's intentional because the right spelling was already taken by someone else.

Visit Glamure Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

Glamure Babes Comment

Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:38:14 PDT

Glamure Babes (0)

09-07-09 03:38pm

COMMENT by Drooler (218)

Looks like Baltic Babes reborn

This site looks a lot in content like Baltic Babes, which I reviewed quite some time ago. Baltic Babes seems to have vanished, with this site being its rebirth. If interested, see the review through my page here. I gave it a 60.

Visit Glamure Babes - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:11:19 PDT

Baltic Babes (0)

04-30-08 03:11pm

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (218)

To Denner (227):

The vids seem to be companions to the photosets, but I didn't see any camera flashing. Actually, the one of Loreta stripping in a doorway was nicely done, even though it was only 5:21 in length. One of Milda on a bed was even shorter (3:24), but it was sexy and again, no flash detectable. (Was kinda jerky even though it had a higher bitrate than Loreta's.)

Maybe they shot the pics and vids separately. And there was sense of "presence" with the models that you don't get often enough with softcore.

They seem to have good pacing in the vids, too, but that damn watermark is a freakin' nuisance.

I guess I'm writing a positive addendum to the review here. Was getting short on character space anyway. But it hardly affects the score. Zips would help a lot.

View Thread (2)

RE: Drooler's Review

Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:44:01 PDT

Baltic Babes (0)

04-30-08 02:44pm

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (227)

To Drooler (218):

You're certainly right about the preview ....
And about the girls too - wow, some pretty ones - and some I've never seen.
But it also looks like - from the trailer - that the videos are of photoshoots...argh...
But right again, 29.99 is really too much for that content.

View Thread (2)