PU - True Beauty Cash - All Activity

RE: AV Erotica

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:28:44 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-27-09 04:28pm

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To greg909 (1):

When it's good at this site, it's very good. Unfortunately, too often part of the girl's image is blurry. There were some great shots there recently of Milla, for instance, that were marred by her head being all blurred out in the largest pics.

It's problem that persists at this site.

View Thread (1)

AV Erotica Comment

Fri, 27 Nov 2009 15:37:10 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-27-09 03:37pm

COMMENT by greg909 (1)

AV Erotica

I'd like to add that while the model list is a bit repetitive, the photo image quality on this site is among the highest I've seen anywhere. I mean, not only are the images BIG in pixel dimensions, but the file sizes are impressive too, giving exquisite fine detail and no compression artifacts to spoil the pictures.

Other sites with similar sized pics (which also have some of AV's work), like Femjoy, often filter their image files to death so that even huge pictures have no detail in them. Not so on AV Erotica!

Visit AV Erotica - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 24 Jul 2009 15:12:00 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

07-24-09 03:12pm

REVIEW REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Drooler (194):

She's gone back to nature I see! Smart move, might have to join again.

View Thread (5)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Sat, 20 Jun 2009 03:03:47 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-20-09 03:03am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

BTW: Are you planing to do something about the currency-issue.
At TBP it states $ 29.95 - but when I try to join (via CCBill) I have to pay Euro: 29.95 - (and Segpay won't let me in)...

View Thread (6)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:54:29 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-19-09 07:54am

COMMENT REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To exotics4me (365):

Man, I was joking as well, and you have a right to make fun of course. It is just that feeling, you know: "if you want to have it been made right, make it by yourself"...

View Thread (6)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:47:05 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-19-09 07:47am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Blame Drooler, he made me do it! Seriously Alex, wouldn't you rather us joke around AND point out the mistakes, instead of cussing you and your site out over mistakes? I've noticed that many sites have taken the comments left here and put them to good use in improving their site, plus we all get a chance to laugh a little. And if you fire everyone, who will be checking your work?

View Thread (6)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:01:00 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-19-09 07:01am

COMMENT REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Well, jokes...

Shame on me, checking every single update by myself again, no trust in photographers and co-workers anymore :( I'll fire them all!

View Thread (6)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:28:08 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-19-09 05:28am

COMMENT REPLY by Drooler (194)

To exotics4me (365):

Bobby Brown probably made them do it.

View Thread (6)

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:26:49 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-19-09 05:26am

COMMENT REPLY by exotics4me (365)

To Drooler (194):

Sounds like they ate the yellow snow!

View Thread (6)

Skokoff Comment

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:45:44 PDT

Skokoff (1)

06-18-09 06:45pm

COMMENT by Drooler (194)

Dey Got De Flakes!

Rejoined and it wasn't long before a Frank Zappa song about incompetent people, "Flakes," came to mind.

Now, just how many ways can you screw up a thumbnail?
1. File not found
2. Links to the wrong enlargement
3. IS the enlargement and, being left justified in the cell, makes the cell a mile long down the page.

And they got 'em -- plenty of ALL of the above -- 'cause dey got de flakes! People who don't check their work, even when it's 2 and half months old.

Pathetic.

And I'm not going to be the person who says where the problem is and all that. Fuck that. Reminds me of the joke where a guy is holding up a little kid on a sidewalk in a club district of New York City, and explains to the cop that the boy had run in while the man, a bass player, was practicing. The boy had grabbed a tuning key and turned it.

The cop said, "What's the big problem with that?"

The bassist answered, "Yeah, but then the little brat wouldn't tell me which one!"

Visit Skokoff - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: zzzins's Review

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:52:23 PDT

AV Erotica (1)

04-19-09 04:52pm

REVIEW REPLY by GCode (79)

To zzzins (11):

Hey,
just so you know, met art is only $19.99 a month through a discount from the best porn site, so it's actually cheaper than this site (it says $29.99 a month at the best porn fact sheet). I Just thought I'd let you know for the future if you didn't know already. Pretty good review, adding that comment about kenny g style music really strayed me away from the thought of ever joining here :)

View Thread (1)

RE: Just found she is also at helens planet

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:16:35 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-16-09 06:16am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To elephant (24):

Her name at Nubiles is Nastya

View Thread (1)

Ero Nata Comment

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 04:39:43 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-15-09 04:39am

COMMENT by elephant (24)

Just found she is also at helens planet

probably most know this already but for those who like her and didn't know she also has a site helensplanet . I just think she is the cutest thing ever, them eyes and her body are amazing. I think she looks like a younger version of Christie Turlington, certainly ha super model looks.

Anyone know her name at nubiles

Visit Ero Nata - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: looks more nude sets now

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:16:13 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-02-09 07:16am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (200):

She DOES do hardcore...

in my imagination!!!

View Thread (4)

RE: looks more nude sets now

Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:14:54 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-02-09 07:14am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To Denner (200):

I like her femjoy material best.

Eronata is fot the completist. If you must have all her work. Like me!

My luck the nude sets start showing up right after my membership expired :(

View Thread (4)

RE: looks more nude sets now

Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:11:45 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-01-09 02:11pm

COMMENT REPLY by elephant (24)

To Denner (200):

Hi Denner, yeah I've seen her around and am a fan of hers and yeah I know she doesn't do the hardcore which you can totally respect that some girls are going to just want to be softcore models. She has a great face for modeling but yeah I do prefer a photo set for the model to at the end get naked.

View Thread (4)

RE: looks more nude sets now

Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:52:20 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-01-09 10:52am

COMMENT REPLY by Denner (200)

To elephant (24):

Just a hint, elephant: the sweet Nata - aka a lot of names - appears on quite a few sites. But never hc. The best stuff I've found with this doll is still the videos at Nubiles....

View Thread (4)

Ero Nata Comment

Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:08:54 PST

Ero Nata (1)

02-01-09 10:08am

COMMENT by elephant (24)

looks more nude sets now

Really love this girl , she is so cute, not sure about non-nude but looks interesting as she is so gorgeous, but good to see the recent stuff looks more of her nude.

Visit Ero Nata - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

Thu, 25 Dec 2008 05:49:17 PST

Skokoff (1)

12-25-08 05:49am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To jd1961 (95):

This problem has since been corrected.

View Thread (4)

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 12:51:38 PST

Skokoff (1)

12-02-08 12:51pm

COMMENT REPLY by badandy400 (99)

To jd1961 (95):

That is one of the most annoying things that can happen with a site. Let us know if this gets worked out for you. Otherwise this one goes to the shit list.

View Thread (4)

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:18:51 PST

Skokoff (1)

12-02-08 09:18am

COMMENT REPLY by jd1961 (95)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Sure

View Thread (4)

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:17:05 PST

Skokoff (1)

12-02-08 09:17am

COMMENT REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To jd1961 (95):

Can you please email me on support at skokoff.com and describe the problem exactly? I would appreciate it a lot.

View Thread (4)

Skokoff Comment

Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:02:51 PST

Skokoff (1)

12-02-08 09:02am

COMMENT by jd1961 (95)

Keep Getting Logged Out**UPDATE** CORRECTED

Nice site, but seems to need work on the technical side of it.

For instance, I find that I am constantly being logged out while downloading.

Visit Skokoff - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:05:13 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-25-08 12:05am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To Drooler (194):

I'm absolutely with you here - and I'm also sure this whole debate your review started very well could be a win-win situation for all - now I think I'll join AvErotica again, btw - AND I look forward to the development for the sites in the True Beauty Cash company.....

View Thread (15)

Skokoff Comment

Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:35:31 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-24-08 09:35am

COMMENT by DivBZero (13)

"+None of those blasted toys!"

Great review, but I won't be joining --- lack of toy content forwarned!

Div

Visit Skokoff - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:54:21 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 07:54am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Denner (200):

I do think I know a thing or two about human nature by this stage in my life, which is why I see the dynamics being different whether the user first reports problems to the webmaster or describes them in a review here.

I think that generally you'll get a prompter and more serious response when you're a reviewer vs. when you're just another user contacting the site privately. Whether Alex would have been any less serious about it had I contacted the site instead is something I just couldn't have known for sure.

In fact, it hadn't even dawned on me that Alex might have been the webmaster since I'd also forgotten that Skokoff is of the same company as is AvErotica and Eronata. Anyway, I think he must be quite an asset for them as their front man since his English is so good, for one thing. My guess is that he's bilingual in English and Russian.

What I foresee happening here is another ultimate win-win for all concerned. Even with the problems, Skokoff has more visibility thanks to the review. That alone might generate more revenue. And with the improvements to come and the higher score and clearing out of the con's, it will do even better. And, of course, it will be better for the users who subscribe.

It's always a judgment call, but I think I've done my part and did it in the right way. And you did yours. It simply isn't our job to tell the sites to correct problems that sites obviously shouldn't have in the first place. That's like having to tell someone to turn on their windshield wipers in a car in pouring rain. So if we do tell them, at our option, that's gravy.

I did decide to try helping Alex to troubleshoot things because he was so earnest about it. He certainly has won me over compared to some of the other webmasters I've dealt with or seen others deal with here.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:39:33 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 06:39am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Aha! Well, there ya go! And believe me, I know what it's like. I have to work with data myself coming from a variety of sources, too, and there's always a chance that someone will not have been watching what they were doing. And guess who gets called on it? So I've learned from the School of Hard Knocks to check things before they get seen by the higher-ups. And to have a little talk with the error-prone upon whom I must depend, like it or not.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:24:23 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 06:24am

REVIEW REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Well, I didn't want to discuss technical issues here but that was the photographer, that mixed up extensions of the files in some galleries. But that is my fault - I have to control everything.

Re. zip names - easy, I put it on my to do list. Thanks for the tip.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:17:23 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 06:17am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Well, I certainly wouldn't say "ruined." "Tainted," perhaps?

And I wonder if it was the scripts, or was it what was fed into them? You only need one file name that doesn't fit the variables that the script was intended to handle for things to go awry. After all, if you used the same scripts for every gallery, it's probably the input that's the problem, since some of the galleries had no problems at all.

Well, good luck! You folks are getting right to the problems immediately. I'm very positively impressed by that, as I'm sure other readers are.

Oh, I just remembered something which you might consider in the future when you have more time: Is there any way that you can give unique names to the zips for the different pic sizes by, for example, putting an "-s" in the zip file name for the 1000px zips, and an "-m" for the 2500px? Right now, all of the zips for a given gallery have identical file names, and some of us might download more than one size. Some other sites do that, and it's a pro when they do.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 06:04:21 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 06:04am

REVIEW REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Denner (200):

I don't ask to consult us before the review. I just don't understand - if you found a problem in the product you bought - usually you were contacting support first and then share your opinion about the product and it's support.

In this case I wouldn't even know about this review and mistakes that were found.

The way the reviewing works on pornusers.com is not the best for site owners. I would ask for any review of the new site not earlier than 3-6 months after the launch and not on the second day after or even before the official launch. But we can live with it, we have to, and you're right, this is the place for surfers/consumers to share opinions. That is why I'm here also, cause I do care about the content and members' satisfaction.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:39:06 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 05:39am

REVIEW REPLY by Denner (200)

To Drooler (194):

It looks like the webmaster is not happy about most cons in Droolers review. That's easy to understand.
But that the same webmaster expects PUs NOT to make a review before consulting the site - and/or the webmaster - is a little far off.
PUs does reviews of what we see on the sites - the reviews is a place for consumers.
It's fine that webmasters/siteowners react to these review, but they cannot except us to hold back til after a debate about problems/cons.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:16:15 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 05:16am

REVIEW REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Well, I don't post the galleries and movies manually. We are improving our scripts to avoid that flaws in the future. I'm sorry, that your impression was kind of ruined by all this glitches.

And yes, I'll post back, when we fix the problems.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:15:05 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 05:15am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Good to know! The Canon 5D is a very respectable camera and usually doesn't exhibit that massive amount of noise seen in the high res samples nor the auto focus mishaps. I wish I could afford a camera of such a level. If he is Canon fan, that would no doubt explain the noise produced by the older camera.

So please do update those high res samples! I doubt I'm the only photography freak that would be worried by those. Thanks to your response however, I will be moving the site up to high priority for review as I do like Skokoff's style in choice of models, poses and sets as shown on the preview pages.

Also, it is always nice to see that webmasters do take notice to the site. Cheers!

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:03:47 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 05:03am

REVIEW REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Toadsith (48):

I talked to skokoff and there are some samples and series that he shot long time ago, when he started to work as a photographer. All the latest series shot by Canon 5D.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 05:02:28 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 05:02am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To True Alex (Webmaster):

Hi Alex. Thanks for getting back so quickly and in such detail. I think if you have a page or site editing program that can check for broken links, it will give you a list.

I review sites expecting them to work. Sure, it's being strict, but I regard them as I would any other products for sale. It's what I as a consumer have purchased, as would others.

Surely you have seen the latest gallery of Natasha, just today. Once again, many of the thumbs were nothing but X's. I suggest carefully checking every gallery for errors before posting it. Then you won't have any problems. And what I don't understand is why this isn't common, routine practice on some web sites.

But I'll revise the review and increase the score after the problems get fixed. I might wait a week, but in the meantime you can post here that you've already fixed them so that others interested in the site will already know.

Thanks again for getting back to me. As I said in the review, I like the site, and as you said, the problems are only technical.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 04:45:04 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 04:45am

REVIEW REPLY by True Alex (Webmaster)

To Drooler (194):

Hello, Drooler and others!

Thanks for the review!
One thing that I don't understand is when you find an error on the site like missing pictures and you don't even try to email me as a support, but you're writing the review here. I don't mind about mentioning my mistakes in the review, but why don't let me know? I don't browse this site too often, thanks that I subscribed to PornUsers' RSS feed.

Well... back to "cons"
-Unruly thumbs: Have been greeted in some galleries, even new ones, with nothing but empty image-tag X�s, not thumb pics. �X� occasionally marks the spot in some other galleries, too.
I'll check every gallery today

-There�s also the �swollen thumb� -- a tiny fraction of the top left of a pic where the thumb should be.
The same as above

-Some clicks for enlargements expand to a full-screen �404� error page.
The same as above

-Wandering watermarks: At least one gallery had the watermark not in the bottom right where it belongs, but in some pics hovering like a drone close to the model, etc.
I will talk to Skokoff about it, would be really appreciate if you send me the links to those galleries

-Oops! I�m a visitor! Some links in the members� area expose you to the public space. (Click �members� for re-entry with no additional login.)
My mistake, I check again everything

-Slow downloads. 30 min. for a 324MB vid. Started at 175Kbps; eased down to 139. And a 140MB vid clocked at only 105. A photoset crawled its way to me at 70.
Well, this is up to your location and location of the servers, there are no any limitations for downloading set on the servers. We should use content distribution network in the future, like Met-Art does, but we are quite small yet ;-)

-Only 14 videos. Sorry, but this is a photography site, even in motion. Flash-flash! The mood music helps a bit.
There are much more videos prepared already. All HDV, all hot :-)

So, all the cons are technical and will be solved quite soon. Skokoff is not that good in all the computers stuff that is why sometimes you find copyrights not on their place. And I couldn't check every image :-) The site is very very new and we're working on making it better.
Thanks for the review again!

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:45:03 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 02:45am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To Drooler (194):

Indeed JPEG artifacts can be a villainous sort, but do not appear to be the perpetrators in this case. Still, the models are quite fetching and the photographer has a well developed style. I will certainly keep an eye on this site. Thanks for the engaging review.

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:40:44 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 02:40am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Toadsith (48):

It varies. I just took what I found to be acceptable.

I'm not a photographer, so when I see "digital noise" it's easier for me to attribute it to something past the point that the shutter clicks (e.g., changes to a jpeg which degrade the image).

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 23 Nov 2008 01:44:48 PST

Skokoff (1)

11-23-08 01:44am

REVIEW REPLY by Toadsith (48)

To Drooler (194):

How is the full resolution photo quality? I just went through the photo galleries section of their tour and while I like the models and the poses, I was a bit stunned by the lack of image quality in their high resolution examples. The photos had tons of digital noise and it looked like the auto focus might be a bit off. Despite seemingly nice lighting, sets and props, I'm guessing that they are using a rather low end DSLR camera. My Nikon D50 honestly shows less noise in its photos - and it retailed at around $600. Maybe they are using a low-end Canon. Are these examples relevant to their latest work?

View Thread (15)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:00:22 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-22-08 06:00am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To lk2fireone (44):

I pretty sure you'll have your hands full with 2 or so years of catchup at JustTeenSite. Enjoy!

View Thread (6)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:37:52 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-22-08 04:37am

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To Drooler (194):

Drooler, thanks for quick response on the pricing of averotica site.
You must live on the East Coast, or else you are a night owl like me. Lol.

I'm thinking of rejoining Just Teen Site for 1 month.
Haven't been a member of Just Teen Site since early 2006, and they've added a lot of pics since that time. Also gives me a chance to see the vids at Just Teen Movie.

I've read your review of Just Teen Site, and looked over the models.
I still have the photosets of Just Teen Site I downloaded back in early 2006, but the site was small back then, and it's definitely worth a second visit for me.

View Thread (6)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:55:57 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-22-08 03:55am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To lk2fireone (44):

No, by the $24.95 for several months I just meant that I'd joined at a time when their archives already had several months in volume. No special deal.

In May this year I joined for a year at 99.95, and I just confirmed that at ccbill. (The question made me want to make sure again.) But you're right that the pricing at the site has doubled for the longest-term membership -- by cutting the time in half.

I'm sure Kahn is reading and will send the message on the TBP.

View Thread (6)

RE: Drooler's Review

Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:32:53 PST

AV Erotica (1)

11-21-08 10:32pm

REVIEW REPLY by lk2fireone (44)

To Drooler (194):

Drooler, did you get a special price at $24.95 for several months' membership to averotica?
If yes, can anyone else get that price, or a discounted price for averotica?

Current prices for membership at the site are listed as:
Monthly: $29.95
3 months: $49.95
6 months: $99.95

Pornusers shows a 1 year membership at $99.95, but the averotica site itself shows a 6-month membership for $99.95.

View Thread (6)

Ero Nata Comment

Sun, 28 Sep 2008 23:19:41 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

09-28-08 11:19pm

COMMENT by jd1961 (95)

Don't Join If You're Not A Fan

Don't join if you are just looking for good old nude model action, because there isn't much.

This site is for the Natasha, Larissa, Nata (why doesn't she have one name??) completist. For the fan of this great model. I am, and I knew going in the limitations (mostly non nudity) of the site. Actually, the photography is very good, and the images are of the highest quality.

But if you are surfing for nude porn, avoid.

Visit Ero Nata - View Replies - Add Reply

AV Erotica Comment

Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:36:29 PDT

AV Erotica (1)

09-14-08 10:36pm

COMMENT by Yonda382 (0)

My impression

I happened to the site tracking down pics of one fine model I have from MetArt and from Femjoy. It was easy to spot the artist.

A real delight if you are fan of the two sites above. Lots of outdoor shoots, generally of over 100 pics each. Many very wonderful and spell binding girls. Nice additions to collections from MetArt and Femjoy. As said no duplicates, however many are from same day/location and are cut from series before or after those sold to Femjoy in many cases.

I found the movies 'better' than either Femjoy or MetArt. I rarely download movies from either of them, but am finding avErotica more compelling.

The daily updates have really bulked the site this year.

If outdoor shoots of Russian girls with no tattoo's is your delight, then you will enjoy this site. The pictures sets are less glamor than MetArt, especially the outdoor ones. More earthy feeling overall.

In my book any 'outdoor shoot' is a leg up anyway, so that is my taste on the matter.

Visit AV Erotica - View Replies - Add Reply

RE: Drooler's Review

Tue, 26 Aug 2008 00:31:29 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

08-26-08 12:31am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To renton (0):

Well, my membership has ended. The last photoset I saw was "Red Pareo." There's more nudity there. And "Home Reading," just before it, also had partial nudity. Neither had that 100% that you speak of.

But once again, I could be saying something that's "premature" regarding the future content of the site.

But I guess I should point out that my review was not intended to be a prediction of future content. I was just reviewing it as it was. What can say? Reviewers do have a habit of using the present -- the now -- as the temporal frame of reference. So as far as future content is concerned, they're all kind of premature, aren't they?

Maybe someone should reply to those reviewers and make sure that they're aware of this.

Would it be unfair to say that the statements about nudity in the "About Me" section of the site (with the headings "Why do I like to pose nude" and "Do I really enjoy being nude?") were made, mmmm ... just a little too hastily? Just wondering.

Anyway, I do understand that patience is a virtue. Things do take time. I am willing to wait. Even longer.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 18 Aug 2008 08:44:41 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

08-18-08 08:44am

REVIEW REPLY by renton (0)

To Drooler (194):

Hi Drooler,

Just thought I'd reply. Over the years, I've come to know the owners/producers of eronata - via their averotica.com website.

I can understand your misgivings about the "non-nude" aspects of the eronata.com site, but I can assure you the lovely Nata will be 100% nude in future updates. The non-nude sets were part of the site before the site had officially opened to the public. So, your review was in fact a tad premature.

Perhaps you can re-review the site a little later.

I know fans of the lovely Nata will love the upcoming updates to eronata.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 03 Aug 2008 00:51:32 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

08-03-08 12:51am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Wittyguy (71):

Wittyguy, you've got a creative mind. Sounds like the stuff of a Monty Python skit had they been on during the Internet Age. Or perhaps "The Man with the Web Cam in His Nose."

Anyway, I can see a "live cam" setup, and switches between the porn user and what's on the screen. Performance art for some, voyeurism for others, and exhibitionism for said man.

And for that mirrors-facing-mirrors effect, he could join Ero Nata!

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Mon, 28 Jul 2008 11:57:18 PDT

Ero Nata (1)

07-28-08 11:57am

REVIEW REPLY by Wittyguy (71)

To Drooler (194):

Hillarious (and very good) review there Drooler. $25 for one darkly lit nude scene? Makes me think there is still hope for my pseudo on line pornstar dreams ... $25 a month to see some average mostly clothed white guy staring at his computer and downloading actual nude porn. Seems like a bargain in comparison to this site.

View Thread (5)

RE: Drooler's Review

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:30:52 PST

AV Erotica (1)

02-10-08 10:30am

REVIEW REPLY by Drooler (194)

To Denner (200):

Thanks, Denner. Credit actually goes to jd1961 for just mentioning it to me in a discussion about Helen, our naughty girl next door, since she's here, too, although without a lot of material so far.

I'm just "spontanteously corruptible" when a site like this gets mentioned and I've never even heard of it before.

One thing that really helps is that now the pro and con sections of the reviews allow 1000 characters each. I took advantage of that. It was a good decision on PU's part.

View Thread (6)

PU - True Beauty Cash - All Activity

RE: AV Erotica

AV Erotica Comment

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

RE: Dey Got De Flakes!

Skokoff Comment

RE: zzzins's Review

RE: Just found she is also at helens planet

Ero Nata Comment

RE: looks more nude sets now

RE: looks more nude sets now

RE: looks more nude sets now

RE: looks more nude sets now

Ero Nata Comment

RE: Keep Getting Logged Out**UPDATE** CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged Out**UPDATE** CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged Out**UPDATE** CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged Out**UPDATE** CORRECTED

Skokoff Comment

RE: Drooler's Review

Skokoff Comment

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

Ero Nata Comment

AV Erotica Comment

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Drooler's Review

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED

RE: Keep Getting Logged OutUPDATE CORRECTED